Common Carp in Czechia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Surveillance of Carp Edema Virus in the Czech Republic Ľubomír Pojezdal Veterinary Research Institute, Brno E-mail: [email protected] 1. 6. 2021 Kgs. Lyngby - Online Common carp in Czechia • 20 000 tones annually • 85 % of local aquaculture • predatory fish and other cyprinids Carp Edema Virus • poxvirus • 1970´s Japan • specific host: koi and common carp • koi sleepy disease/carp edema virus disease Diagnosis (at VRI) • 2014 – nested PCR, CEFAS primers • 2017 – real-time PCR 2012 - 2016 • archive unexplained mortalities, KHV negative fish with clinical symptoms • ongoing cases from farmers and koi breeders • 42 locations overall, 9 positive + clinical signs - non-target species 2017 - 2018 • Ministry of Agriculture grant started • 2017: 21 locations, 13 positive • 2018: 22 locations, 4 positive + Clinical signs Positive cases are overrepresented, since not enough asymptomatic locations are surveilled 2019 - 2020 • State Veterinary Administration – Samples from KHV surveillance • 2019: 152 locations, 17 positive • 2020: 124 locations, 6 positive – Summer – No clinical signs Sequencing • P4a gene • All genogroups by Matras et al. (2017) present • Groups I and IIb both in koi and common carp • Group IIa in koi only Fish Species • grass carp, silver carp, goldfish, ide, burbot • pike perch, sturgeon, crucian carp and hybrids • only common carp and koi carp positive Viral Co-Infections • one co-infection with KHV (CyHV-3) • four sites co-infected with SVC Viral DNA Degradation Problem Viral load was completely lost in multiple tissue samples stored at -20 °C over 2 to 3 months Storage at -80 °C working so far (3+ years) Conclusions • overall positivity of asymptomatic samples low • but: clinical signs + no KHV = significant chance of CEV • not detected outside of koi or common carp • all CEV genogroups present Special thanks to: Miroslava Palíková Stanislava Reschová Jitka Motlová Veronika Piačková Czech State Veterinary Administration This study was supported by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic MZE-RO0518 and the project PROFISH CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000869 financed by ERDF in the operational programme VVV MŠMT..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Pest Risk Assessment for Asian Carps in Oregon
Pest Risk Assessment for Asian Carps in Oregon IDENTITY Name: Asian Carps The common usage of the term “Asian Carps” encompasses the following four species of introduced carp (there are additional species of carp native to Asia that have been introduced into the U.S. but are not commonly included under term “Asian Carps” – see text). • bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) • silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) • black carp (Mylopharyngodon piceus) • grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) Taxonomic Position: order Cypriniformes, family Cyprinidae [carps and minnows] The family Cyprinidae is very diverse – it includes species that feed on plankton, herbivores, omnivores, piscivores (fish eaters such as our native pike minnow) and species like the black carp whose teeth are specially modified to crush the shells of mussels and snails - and as such it can be difficult to distinguish native versus nonnative species based on a few simple characteristics. Nevertheless, the collection of nonnative species such as Asian carps should be reported to the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. Positive identification is crucial and for this reason we recommend retaining the specimen if possible or documenting the catch with photographs. Well-focused images that show the whole fish from various angles as well as close-ups of the head and fins are ideal. Additional information on identification of Asian and other nonnative carps has been compiled by the US Geological Survey and can be accessed online <http://fisc.er.usgs.gov/Carp_ID/index.html>. RISK RATING SUMMARY Relative Risk Rating: HIGH Numerical Score: 6 (on a 1-9 scale) Uncertainty: Moderate This Risk Evaluation summarizes much of the information previously compiled by the USFWS in 2008.
[Show full text]
APPENDIX M Common and Scientific Species Names
Bay du Nord Development Project Environmental Impact Statement APPENDIX M Common and Scientific Species Names Bay du Nord Development Project Environmental Impact Statement Common and Species Names Common Name Scientific Name Fish Abyssal Skate Bathyraja abyssicola Acadian Redfish Sebastes fasciatus Albacore Tuna Thunnus alalunga Alewife (or Gaspereau) Alosa pseudoharengus Alfonsino Beryx decadactylus American Eel Anguilla rostrata American Plaice Hippoglossoides platessoides American Shad Alosa sapidissima Anchovy Engraulidae (F) Arctic Char (or Charr) Salvelinus alpinus Arctic Cod Boreogadus saida Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Thunnus thynnus Atlantic Cod Gadus morhua Atlantic Halibut Hippoglossus hippoglossus Atlantic Mackerel Scomber scombrus Atlantic Salmon (landlocked: Ouananiche) Salmo salar Atlantic Saury Scomberesox saurus Atlantic Silverside Menidia menidia Atlantic Sturgeon Acipenser oxyrhynchus oxyrhynchus Atlantic Wreckfish Polyprion americanus Barndoor Skate Dipturus laevis Basking Shark Cetorhinus maximus Bigeye Tuna Thunnus obesus Black Dogfish Centroscyllium fabricii Blue Hake Antimora rostrata Blue Marlin Makaira nigricans Blue Runner Caranx crysos Blue Shark Prionace glauca Blueback Herring Alosa aestivalis Boa Dragonfish Stomias boa ferox Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis Brown Bullhead Catfish Ameiurus nebulosus Burbot Lota lota Capelin Mallotus villosus Cardinal Fish Apogonidae (F) Chain Pickerel Esox niger Common Grenadier Nezumia bairdii Common Lumpfish Cyclopterus lumpus Common Thresher Shark Alopias vulpinus Crucian Carp
[Show full text]
Press Release
Institute of Statistics [email protected] Rr. Vllazën Huta, www.instat.gov.al Ndërtesa 35, Hyrja 1 Tel: +355 4 2222 411 Tiranë, Kodi Postar 1017 Fax: +355 4 2222 411 Fishery Statistics 2019 Tirana, 26 June 2020: In 2019, catches in all fish categories was 15,011 tonnes from 14,875 tonnes in 2018, increasing by 0.91 %. Fig. 1 Fish catches in total 2014 – 2019 (tonnes) 16000 14,875 15,011 15000 14000 13000 12,534 12,719 12000 11,022 11,170 11000 10000 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Catches structure by water categories Fishing water categories are: marine, brackish waters, lagoons, inland waters, aquaculture and mollusks. Two are the main categories which represent the biggest percentage of fish catches, respectively “Marine” fishing with 36.64 % and "Aquaculture" with 34.83 % followed by Inland waters with 18.46 % of the total catches. Fig. 2 Catches structure by water categories, 2019 (in percentage) 7.16 Marine Costal line 36.64 Costal lagoons 34.83 Inland waters Aquaculture Mitylus galloprovicialis 18.46 2.28 0.62 For release 26/06/2020 Continues Page 2 Fishery Statistics 2019 Annual catch changes by water category In 2019, the category “Inland waters” faced the largest increase, by 14.20 % compared to the previous year, followed by the catches of the category of “Coastal line” by 8.56 % and “Aquaculture” by 1.77 %. The aquatic category "Coastal lagoons", marked a decrease compared to a year ago, about 73.25 %, followed by the category "Mollusk" with 2.98 %. Tab.1 Catches by water category Description 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Fishing
[Show full text]
Interspecific Differences in Hypoxia-Induced Gill Remodeling in Carp Author(S): Rashpal S
Interspecific Differences in Hypoxia-Induced Gill Remodeling in Carp Author(s): Rashpal S. Dhillon, Lili Yao, Victoria Matey, Bo-Jian Chen, An-Jie Zhang, Zhen- Dong Cao, Shi-Jian Fu, Colin J. Brauner, Yuxiang S. Wang, and Jeffrey G. Richards Source: Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, Vol. 86, No. 6 (November/December 2013), pp. 727-739 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/673180 . Accessed: 18/11/2013 16:25 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Physiological and Biochemical Zoology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 137.82.81.121 on Mon, 18 Nov 2013 16:25:38 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 727 Interspecific Differences in Hypoxia-Induced Gill Remodeling in Carp Rashpal S. Dhillon1,* (and thus positively correlated with hypoxia tolerance), inde- Lili Yao1 pendent of phylogeny. The hypoxia-induced changes in gill mor- Victoria Matey2 phology resulted in reduced variation in mass-specific gill surface Bo-Jian Chen3 area among species and eliminated the relationship between 3 An-Jie Zhang LOEcrit and mass-specific gill surface area.
[Show full text]
Conservation of Crucian Carp by Chris Turnball
The case for the conservation of Crucian Carp as an angling resource. Chris Turnbull The crucian carp Carassius carassius is a native British species of fish that was once common throughout much of England. Primarily a still water species, crucian carp are traditionally associated with smaller, shallower still waters, such as ponds, marl pits, some estate lakes and millponds. In recent times, however, crucian carp have fallen onto hard times for a variety variety of reasons, leading to their local extinction in many areas that were once strongholds of the species. Many of the ponds once known to hold them have suffered from drought or habitat deterioration through neglect, while other waters have been lost altogether due to being backfilled in order to develop the land. Above and beyond this, however, the overriding factor behind the decline of the species has been the introduction of closely-related non-native species of fish into traditional crucian habitats, including various strains of king carp Cyprinus carpio and Goldfish Carrasius auratus with which crucians have been able to freely interbreed resulting in high levels of hybridization occurring, leading to the gradual decline of the genetic integrity of the species resulting in its localized extinction eventually taking place. Today this situation has become critical putting crucians under such pressure that they are can be considered to be an endangered species. King carp now dominate angling to such an extent that few fisheries are without them and unless angling clubs and fishery managers take proactive steps to conserve crucian carp, it is entirely likely that they will eventually become nationally extinct apart from in a tiny number of fisheries currently being managed as specialist crucian carp fisheries.
[Show full text]
Diet of Silver Crucian Carp Carasssius Gibelio in Lake E÷Irdir
Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 3: 87-91 (2003) Diet of Silver Crucian Carp Carasssius gibelio in Lake E÷irdir øsmet Balık1,*, Belgin Karaúahin2, Remziye Özkök1, Hıdır Çubuk1, Rahmi Uysal1 1 Fisheries Research Institute, 32500 E÷irdir, Isparta, Turkey 2 Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Directorate of Istanbul, Ba÷dat Street, Erenköy, Istanbul - Turkey * Corresponding Author: Tel.: +90. 246 3133460; Fax: +90. 246 3133463; Received 06 February 2004 E-mail: [email protected] Accepted 05 April 2004 Abstract Diet of silver crucian carp Carassius gibelio was investigated from 265 guts collected from Lake E÷irdir between March 2001 and March 2002. The results of this study showed that the feeding activity of the silver crucian carp ranged among seasons within year. The percentages of the non-empty guts were similar between summer (29.8%) and autumn (30.1%). This ratio was 16.3% and 47.1% in spring and winter, respectively. Twenty-three taxonomic categories were identified from the 3998 food items analyzed. The diet of the silver crucian carp were dominated by benthic and planktonic invertebrates such as Gastropods, Dipterans, Cladocerans, Copepods, and Ostracods. Daphnia sp. was found in 42.6% of the non-empty gut-samples. The frequencies of occurrence of several other food categories, such as Chironomus sp., Cyclops sp., Ostracods, Acarina, and Bosmina sp., were also relatively high. Key Words: Diet, silver crucian carp, Carassius gibelio, Lake E÷irdir Introduction Materials and Methods The silver crucian carp Carassius gibelio is Diet of the silver crucian carp was assessed on distributed mainly in the former Soviet Union, the basis of the gut contents determined by dissection Europe, Korea and north-east Chine (Zou et al., of fish collected from 4 different sites of Lake E÷irdir 2001).
[Show full text]
Historical Information on Common Carp (Cyprinus Carpio) in Norway
Fauna norvegica 2013 Vol. 33: 13-19. ISSN: 1502-4873 Historical information on common carp (Cyprinus carpio) in Norway Einar Kleiven1 Kleiven E. 2013. Historical information on common carp (Cyprinus carpio) in Norway. Fauna norvegica 33: 13-19. The common carp (Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758) is an introduced fish species in Norway over the past 300 years. Many attempts have been conducted in order to try to create self-sustaining populations, but the species is very rare. Several authors have asserted that carp was introduced by monks, but this is not documented. The first written reference to common carp in Norway is the often quoted information in Pontoppidan (1753). However, the oldest knowledge of common carp can now be dated back to about 1685. The first introduction took place in the Bergen area, western Norway. doi: 10.5324/fn.v33i0.1583. Recieved: 2013-04-17. Accepted: 2013-06-01. Published online: 2013-12-20. Keywords: Common carp, introduction, Norway 1. Norwegian Institute of Water Research (NIVA), Region South, Jon Lilletuns vei 3, NO-4879 Grimstad Corresponding author: Einar Kleiven E-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION few persons. Additional information to those outlined by Kålås & The common carp (Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758) (later Johnsen (1995) will be presented chronologically with UTM called carp) is an introduced fish species in Norway (Collett references (Table 1, Table 2). 1905), and today has a scattered distribution in the southern Stocking of fish species in Norway is illegal without part of the country (Kålås & Johnsen 1995; Hesthagen 2012). permission from the authorities, by the Act of 6 March Several attempts of introduction have been conducted over the 1964 about salmon fishing and inland fishing.
[Show full text]
Asia-Pacific Fishery Commission
E APFIC/1 8/INF -06 March 2018 Organización Food and Organisation des Продовольственная и ельскохозяйственная de las Agriculture Nations Unies c Naciones Unidas Organization pour организация para la of the l'alimentation Объединенных Alimentación y la et l'agriculture United Nations Наций Agricult u ra ASIA-PACIFIC FISHERY COMMISSION Thirty-fifth Session Cebu, the Philippines, 11-13 May 2018 Regional overview of the status and trends of fisheries and aquaculture in the Asia-Pacific Region 2016 DRAFT ASIA-PACIFIC FISHERY COMMISSION (APFIC) Regional overview of the Status and Trends of Aquaculture and Fisheries in the Asia Pacific Region 2016 _____________________________________________________________________ Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific Bangkok, 2017 Citation: APFIC 2017 Regional overview of the Status and Trends of Aquaculture and Fisheries in the Asia Pacific Region 2017. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.
[Show full text]
Kosher Fish List
Kosher Fish List Cichlids Including: Tilapias Mozambique mouthbrooder Tilapia mossambica; Cichlios; Rio Grande perch This is a consolidated list of the more common Cigarfish See: Jacks varieties, additional types with their latin species Cisco See Trouts name at the JSOR office and at www.jsor.org Coalfish See: Codfish Cobia, cabio, or black bonito Cod, cultus, black, blue, Albacore See: Mackerels or ling. See: Greenlings, Sablefish Amberjack See: Jacks Codfish, Including: Cod, Haddock, Pacific cod; Pollock, Anchovies Including: European anchovy, North of saithe, or coalfish; Walleye Pollock, Hakes; Whiting; California anchovy Blue whiting or poutassou Tomcods or frostfish Angelfish and butterfly fish Coho salmon See: Trouts Barracudas Corbina or Corvina, See: Drums Bass See Sea Basses. Temperate basses, Sunfish, Drums Crapplie See: Sunfish Blackfish See: Carps, Wrasses Blacksmith See: Damselfish Crucian carp See: Carps Blueback See: Flounders, Herrings, Trouts Dolphin fish or mahimahis Not to be confused with the Bluefish or snapper blue Mammal called Dolphin or Porpoise, which is non kosher. Bluegill See: Sunfish Drums and croakers, Including: Seatrouts and Bocaccio See: Scorpionfish carvinas; Weakfish, White seabass, Croakers, Silver Bonefish perch, White or King croaker; Black croaker Spotfin Bonito See: Cobia, Mackerels croaker); Yellowfin croaker, Drums; Red drum or channel bass Freshwater drum, Kingfish or king Bowfin Bowfish, Freshwater dogfish, or grindle whitings California corbina, spot or lafayette; Queenfish Bream See: Carps, Atlantic Pomfret, P Cubbyu or ribbon fish Brill See: Flounder Flounders Including: Summer flounder or fluke, Yellowtail flounder, Winter flounder, lemon sole, Buffalo Fishes See: Suckers Halibuts; "Dover" sole, "English" sole, Yellowfin sole Burbot See: Codfish Pacific turbots, Curlfin turbot or Diamond turbot, ButterFish Pacific pompano, harvestfish Greenland turbot or halibut Brill (scophthalmus rhomus).
[Show full text]
Effects of Crucian Carp (Carassius Auratus) on Water Quality in Aquatic
water Article Effects of Crucian Carp (Carassius auratus) on Water Quality in Aquatic Ecosystems: An Experimental Mesocosm Study 1, 2, 3 4 5 Yehui Huang y, Xueying Mei y, Lars G. Rudstam , William D. Taylor , Jotaro Urabe , Erik Jeppesen 6,7,8 , Zhengwen Liu 1,7,9,* and Xiufeng Zhang 1,* 1 Department of Ecology and Institute of Hydrobiology, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China; [email protected] 2 College of Resources and Environment, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China; [email protected] 3 Department of Natural Resources, Cornell Biological Field Station, Cornell University, New York, NY 13030, USA; [email protected] 4 Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada; [email protected] 5 Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Japan; [email protected] 6 Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, DK-8600 Silkeborg, Denmark; [email protected] 7 Sino-Danish Centre for Education and Research (SDC), Beijing 100070, China 8 Limnology Laboratory, Department of Biological Sciences and Centre for Ecosystem Research and Implementation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara 06800, Turkey 9 State Key Laboratory of Lake Science and Environment, Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China * Correspondence: [email protected] (Z.L.); [email protected] (X.Z.) These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 13 February 2020; Accepted: 12 May 2020; Published: 19 May 2020 Abstract: The presence of omnivorous fish is known to affect aquatic ecosystems, including water quality. The effect, however, depends on the species in question, and our knowledge is limited on the effect of omnivorous crucian carp (Carassius auratus), a common and often the most numerous fish species in eutrophic shallow lakes in China.
[Show full text]
Carp Dominate Fish Communities Managing the Impacts of Carp Throughout Many Waterways in South- Eastern Australia
Managing the Impacts of Introduced carp dominate fish communities the Impacts of Carp Managing throughout many waterways in south- eastern Australia. They also occur in Carp Western Australia and Tasmania and have the potential to spread through many more of Australia’s water systems. Carp could eventually become widespread throughout the country. Carp are known to damage aquatic plants and increase water turbidity but their impacts on native fish species are not yet clear. Carp are also a commercial and recreational fishing resource. Managing the Impacts of Carp provides a comprehensive review of the history of carp in Australia, their biology, the damage they cause and community attitudes to these problems and their solutions. Key strategies for successful carp manage- ment are recommended by the authors who are scientific experts in carp manage- ment. These strategies are illustrated by case studies. Managing the Impacts of Carp is an essential guide for policy makers, land and water managers, carp fishers and all others interested in carp management. AGRICULTURE, FISHERIES AND FORESTRY - AUSTRALIA Managing the Impacts of Carp John Koehn, Andr ea Brumley and Peter Gehrke Scientific editing by Mary Bomfor d Published by Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra © Commonwealth of Australia 2000 ISBN 0 644 29240 7 (set) ISBN 0 642 73201 9 (this publication) This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Bureau of Rural Sciences. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Executive Director, Bureau of Rural Sciences, PO Box E11, Kingston ACT 2604.
[Show full text]
Spontaneous Cytotoxic Activity of Neutrophilic Granulocytes In
‹›•aŒ¤‹† Fish Pathology, 31 (1),51-52,1996.3 Spontaneous Cytotoxic Activity of separated from the head kidney on discontinuous Neutrophilic Granulocytes in Ginbuna density gradients of Percoll (Pharmacia, Sweden) according to the method previously described3,4). Crucian Carp and Channel Catfish The head kidney cells were applied to the dis continuous density gradients (1.065, 1.080 and 1.090 Osamu Kurata*1,*3,Satoshi Hasegawa*1, Nobuaki Okamoto*1,*4,Teruyuki Nakanishi*2 g/ml for ginbuna crucian carp and common carp, 1.065, 1.070 and 1.080 g/ml for channel catfish) and and Yayoi Ikeda*1 centrifugated at 4•Ž for 20 min at 350 •~ g for gin *1Department of Aquatic Biosciences, Tokyo University of buna crucian carp and common carp, and 300 •~ g for Fisheries, Konan 4, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108, Japan channel catfish. Neutrophilic granulocytes of gin *2National Research Institute of Aquaculture , buna crucian carp and common carp were in the Tamaki, Mie 519-04, Japan interface of 1.080-1.090 g/ml and that of channel (Received December 1,1995) catfish were in the interface of 1.070-1.080 g/ml. The effector cells were stained with Giemsa and Key words:ginbuna crucian carp, channel catfish, neu Sudan black B, and observed under light microscopy trophilic granulocytes, spontaneous cytotoxic activity to identify the cell types. The 51Cr release assay was adopted to determine the cytotoxicity of the effector As in mammals fish neutrophilic granulocytes mi cells. K562 (human chronic myelogenous leukemia) grate more quickly than macrophages during the cells, which were often used for cytotoxicity assay of acute phase of inflammation1), and phagocytose fish leucocytes5), were used as target cells.
[Show full text]