Carp Dominate Fish Communities Managing the Impacts of Carp Throughout Many Waterways in South- Eastern Australia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Carp Dominate Fish Communities Managing the Impacts of Carp Throughout Many Waterways in South- Eastern Australia Managing the Impacts of Introduced carp dominate fish communities the Impacts of Carp Managing throughout many waterways in south- eastern Australia. They also occur in Carp Western Australia and Tasmania and have the potential to spread through many more of Australia’s water systems. Carp could eventually become widespread throughout the country. Carp are known to damage aquatic plants and increase water turbidity but their impacts on native fish species are not yet clear. Carp are also a commercial and recreational fishing resource. Managing the Impacts of Carp provides a comprehensive review of the history of carp in Australia, their biology, the damage they cause and community attitudes to these problems and their solutions. Key strategies for successful carp manage- ment are recommended by the authors who are scientific experts in carp manage- ment. These strategies are illustrated by case studies. Managing the Impacts of Carp is an essential guide for policy makers, land and water managers, carp fishers and all others interested in carp management. AGRICULTURE, FISHERIES AND FORESTRY - AUSTRALIA Managing the Impacts of Carp John Koehn, Andr ea Brumley and Peter Gehrke Scientific editing by Mary Bomfor d Published by Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra © Commonwealth of Australia 2000 ISBN 0 644 29240 7 (set) ISBN 0 642 73201 9 (this publication) This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Bureau of Rural Sciences. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Executive Director, Bureau of Rural Sciences, PO Box E11, Kingston ACT 2604. Published by: Copies available fr om: Bureau of Rural Sciences AFFA Shopfront PO BOX E11 GPO Box 858 Kingston ACT 2604 Canberra ACT 2601 Ph: 02 6272 4282 Phone: 02 6272 5550 Fax: 02 6272 4747 Fax: 02 6272 5771 Internet: http://www.brs.gov.au Email: [email protected] The Bureau of Rural Sciences is a professionally independent scientific bureau within the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry – Australia (AFFA). Its mission is to provide first-class scientific research and advice to enable the department to achieve its vision — rising national prosperity and quality of life through competitive and sustainable agricultural, fisheries and forestry industries. The Commonwealth and all persons acting for the Commonwealth in preparing this booklet disclaim all responsibility and liability to any person arising directly or indirectly from any person taking or not taking action based upon the information in this booklet. Affiliations: Authors: John Koehn, Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Victoria Andrea Brumley, Forestech, East Gippsland Institute of TAFE Peter Gehrke, NSW Fisheries Office of Conservation Editor: Mary Bomford, Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra. Typeset by Lisa Curtin. Printed by Pirie Printers. Preferr ed way to cite this publication: Koehn, J., Brumley, A. and Gehrke, P. (2000) Managing the Impacts of Carp. Bureau of Rural Sciences (Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry – Australia), Canberra. Printed by Pirie Printers Pty limited For ewor d Carp (Cyprinus carpio) have become the The principles underlying the strategic man- most abundant large freshwater fish in agement of vertebrate pests have been Australia and are considered a problem described in Managing Vertebrate Pests: because of their perceived impacts on water Principles and Strategies (Braysher 1993) quality, soft-leaved aquatic plants and native and in Australia’s Pest Animals: New fish populations through competition and Solutions to Old Problems (Olsen 1998). The lowering habitat quality. Carp are also val- emphasis is on managing of pest damage ued by those who fish them commercially or rather than on simply reducing pest density. for recreation, and carp are used to produce The guidelines recommend that, wherever fertiliser, pet food and bait and small quanti- practical, management should concentrate ties are sold in Australia and exported to on achieving clearly defined economic or European markets for human consumption. conservation benefits. There is little reliable information about the This publication complements the National extent and nature of many of the problems Management Strategy for Carp Control caused by carp and how they can best be (NMSCC) developed by the Carp Control solved. This has led to diverse views about Coordinating Group (CCCG). The NMSCC carp management. describes a framework for a uniform national approach to the management of carp. Both Whether carp have simply taken advantage documents have been produced under the of poor habitat condition or whether they are Federal Government's Natural Heritage a cause of it is subject to much debate. The Trust. reality is probably a combination of the two. Regardless, assessing and managing the The approach to managing carp damage set impacts of carp cannot be considered in iso- out in these guidelines has been approved by lation from other water management issues. the Standing Committees on: Agriculture and Carp management is just one of many factors Resource Management; Conservation; and which influence water quality and aquatic Fisheries and Aquaculture. biodiversity. These guidelines will help policy-makers This publication is one in a series of Bureau and managers reduce the damage to water of Rural Sciences pest animal management resources and the naural environment guidelines which provides natural resource caused by carp through the use of scientifi- users, managers, advisers and funding agen- cally-based management that is humane, cies with ‘best practice’ national guidelines cost-effective, and integrated with ecologi- for managing the economic and environ- cally sustainable development. mental damage caused by carp. Others in the series include guidelines for managing feral horses, rabbits, foxes, feral goats, feral pigs, rodents and wild dogs. Peter O’Brien Executive Director Bureau of Rural Sciences Managing the Impacts of Carp iii Contents FOREWORD iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ix SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 7 1. TAXONOMY AND HISTORY OF INTRODUCTION 11 Summary 11 1.1 Family Cyprinidae 11 1.2 Carp in Europe and Asia 12 1.3 Introduction of Cyprinids to Australia 17 1.4 Genetic strains of carp in Australia 19 2. DISPERSAL, DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE 23 Summary 23 2.1 Factors contributing to the spread of carp 23 2.2 Distribution and abundance 29 3. BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY 33 Summary 33 3.1 General description 33 3.2 Habitats 35 3.3 Feeding behaviour and diet 39 3.4 Population dynamics 40 3.5 Ecological interactions 52 3.6 Current research 58 4. COMMUNITY ATTITUDES AND EXPECTATIONS 61 Summary 61 4.1 Attitudes from the northern hemisphere 61 4.2 Public attitudes in Australia 62 4.3 Attitudes of environmental authorities in Australia 64 4.4 Conservation groups 65 4.5 Indigenous communities 67 4.6 Animal welfare and animal rights 68 4.7 Commercial fishing industry 69 4.8 Other businesses 70 4.9 Recreational fishers 71 4.10 Carp for human consumption 74 4.11 Carp action groups and catchment management 74 Managing the Impacts of Carp v 5. ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND COMMERCIAL USE 77 Summary 77 5.1 Introduction 77 5.2 Economic impacts 78 5.3 Environmental impact 79 5.4 Resource value and commercial use 88 6. PAST AND CURRENT MANAGEMENT 99 Summary 99 6.1 Public pressure for action 99 6.2 National management 99 6.3 State and Territory management 102 7. TECHNIQUES TO MEASURE AND MANAGE IMPACTS AND ABUNDANCE 111 Summary 111 7.1 Estimating carp abundance 111 7.2 Measuring the impacts of carp on the environment 117 7.3 Population control techniques 121 7.4 Methods for impact reduction 130 7.5 Cost of control 134 8. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT AT THE LOCAL AND REGIONAL LEVEL 137 Summary 137 8.1 Introduction 138 8.2 Define the problem 138 8.3 Develop a management plan 139 8.4 Implementation 152 8.5 Monitoring and evaluation 152 8.6 Case studies 156 9. IMPLEMENTATION 167 Summary 167 9.1 National level 167 9.2 Government involvement 167 9.3 The regional role of extension services and catchment management 169 9.4 Group formation 169 9.5 Facilitating effective groups 170 vi Bureau of Rural Sciences 10. DEFICIENCIES IN KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICE 175 Summary 175 10.1 Introduction 175 10.2 Populations, distribution and abundance 177 10.3 Economic impacts 178 10.4 Environmental impacts 178 10.5 Population control techniques 179 10.6 Management 182 REFERENCES 185 APPENDIX A Economic strategies for carp management 205 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS 209 GLOSSARY 211 SCIENTIFIC NAMES 219 INDEX 225 FIGURES Figur e 1 Strategic approach to managing carp damage. 10 Figur e 2 Distribution of carp of all strains. 25 Figur e 3 Key features of carp anatomy. 34 Figur e 4 Pharyngeal teeth. 35 Figur e 5 Theoretical stock-recruitment relationship for fish populations. 43 Figur e 6 Relationship between carp recruitment and spawner abundance in New South Wales. 44 Figur e 7 Diagram of whole otolith. 45 Figur e 8 Average length and weight of carp at different ages in southern Australia. 46 Figur e 9 Predicted lengths for female and male carp at different ages from the lower Murray River. 46 Figur e 10 Results of a survey of habitats around the Paroo, Darling, Murrumbidgee and Murray Rivers. 47 Figur e 11 Decline of native fish species. 57 Figur e 12 Model of the major effects of carp on structural and process components of the aquatic environment. 82 Figur e 13 Effect of exposure time on the relationship between carp density and plant biomass remaining. 86 Figur e 14 Catches of carp and black bream in Gippsland Lakes, Victoria, from 1987–88 to 1997–98. 93 Figur e 15 Possible relationships between carp density and the damage they cause.
Recommended publications
  • Review and Updated Checklist of Freshwater Fishes of Iran: Taxonomy, Distribution and Conservation Status
    Iran. J. Ichthyol. (March 2017), 4(Suppl. 1): 1–114 Received: October 18, 2016 © 2017 Iranian Society of Ichthyology Accepted: February 30, 2017 P-ISSN: 2383-1561; E-ISSN: 2383-0964 doi: 10.7508/iji.2017 http://www.ijichthyol.org Review and updated checklist of freshwater fishes of Iran: Taxonomy, distribution and conservation status Hamid Reza ESMAEILI1*, Hamidreza MEHRABAN1, Keivan ABBASI2, Yazdan KEIVANY3, Brian W. COAD4 1Ichthyology and Molecular Systematics Research Laboratory, Zoology Section, Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran 2Inland Waters Aquaculture Research Center. Iranian Fisheries Sciences Research Institute. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Bandar Anzali, Iran 3Department of Natural Resources (Fisheries Division), Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran 4Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Ontario, K1P 6P4 Canada *Email: [email protected] Abstract: This checklist aims to reviews and summarize the results of the systematic and zoogeographical research on the Iranian inland ichthyofauna that has been carried out for more than 200 years. Since the work of J.J. Heckel (1846-1849), the number of valid species has increased significantly and the systematic status of many of the species has changed, and reorganization and updating of the published information has become essential. Here we take the opportunity to provide a new and updated checklist of freshwater fishes of Iran based on literature and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history and new fish collections. This article lists 288 species in 107 genera, 28 families, 22 orders and 3 classes reported from different Iranian basins. However, presence of 23 reported species in Iranian waters needs confirmation by specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • Chanodichthys Recurviceps (A Fish, No Common Name) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Chanodichthys recurviceps (a fish, no common name) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, June 2012 Revised, November 2016 Web Version, 6/18/2018 Photo: H. T. Cheng. Licensed under CC BY-NC. Available: http://naturewatch.org.nz/taxa/187285-Culter-recurviceps. (November 2016). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Zhao and Cui (2011): “Known from Zhu Jiang River (Pearl River) in Guangdong and Guanxi Provinces, and Hainan Province in China.” Status in the United States This species has not been reported in the United States. 1 Means of Introductions in the United States This species has not been reported in the United States. 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From ITIS (2016): “Kingdom Animalia Subkingdom Bilateria Infrakingdom Deuterostomia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Infraphylum Gnathostomata Superclass Osteichthyes Class Actinopterygii Subclass Neopterygii Infraclass Teleostei Superorder Ostariophysi Order Cypriniformes Superfamily Cyprinoidea Family Cyprinidae Genus Culter Basilewsky, 1855 Species Culter recurviceps (Richardson, 1846)” From Eschmeyer et al. (2016): “recurviceps, Leuciscus Richardson [J.] 1846:295 [Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science 15th meeting [1845] […]] Canton, China. No types known. Based solely on an illustration by Reeves (see Whitehead 1970:210, Pl. 17a […]). •Valid as Erythroculter recurviceps (Richardson 1846) -- (Lu in Pan et al. 1991:93 […]). •Questionably the same as Culter alburnus Basilewsky 1855 -- (Bogutskaya & Naseka 1996:24 […], Naseka 1998:75 […]). •Valid as Culter recurviceps (Richardson 1846) -- (Luo & Chen in Chen et al. 1998:188 […], Zhang et al. 2016:59 […]). •Valid as Chanodichthys recurviceps (Richardson 1846) -- (Kottelat 2013:87 […]).
    [Show full text]
  • Inland Waters C-04 Poissons, Crustacés, Mollusques
    397 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by species items Asia - Inland waters C-04 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par catégories d'espèces Asie - Eaux continentales (a) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por categorías de especies Asia - Aguas continentales English name Scientific name Species group Nom anglais Nom scientifique Groupe d'espèces 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Nombre inglés Nombre científico Grupo de especies t t t t t t t Freshwater bream Abramis brama 11 19 479 11 743 10 650 11 815 12 749 13 616 14 629 Freshwater breams nei Abramis spp 11 3 7 20 9 20 10 38 Common carp Cyprinus carpio 11 43 435 41 152 47 741 45 168 34 044 32 805 34 014 Tench Tinca tinca 11 2 0 0 0 690 778 983 Crucian carp Carassius carassius 11 8 273 6 877 6 213 5 686 5 528 5 226 4 602 Goldfish Carassius auratus 11 172 1 1 1 1 2 1 Roach Rutilus rutilus 11 235 537 502 733 1 084 1 365 1 498 Kutum Rutilus frisii 11 9 210 2 320 6 624 6 905 10 120 7 199 6 433 Roaches nei Rutilus spp 11 3 298 1 943 1 867 1 626 2 365 1 895 2 469 Rudd Scardinius erythrophthalmus 11 ... ... ... ... ... ... 485 Common dace Leuciscus leuciscus 11 215 250 300 176 104 91 73 Mud carp Cirrhinus molitorella 11 3 4 7 7 6 6 9 Grass carp(=White amur) Ctenopharyngodon idellus 11 4 296 4 631 5 213 4 703 2 621 725 1 462 Silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix 11 18 324 16 958 12 055 14 819 9 415 4 270 4 451 Bighead carp Hypophthalmichthys nobilis 11 1 818 1 637 2 621 3 841 4 454 447 703 Kinneret bleak Acanthobrama terraesanctae 11 1 155 626 1 171 1
    [Show full text]
  • Pest Risk Assessment for Asian Carps in Oregon
    Pest Risk Assessment for Asian Carps in Oregon IDENTITY Name: Asian Carps The common usage of the term “Asian Carps” encompasses the following four species of introduced carp (there are additional species of carp native to Asia that have been introduced into the U.S. but are not commonly included under term “Asian Carps” – see text). • bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) • silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) • black carp (Mylopharyngodon piceus) • grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) Taxonomic Position: order Cypriniformes, family Cyprinidae [carps and minnows] The family Cyprinidae is very diverse – it includes species that feed on plankton, herbivores, omnivores, piscivores (fish eaters such as our native pike minnow) and species like the black carp whose teeth are specially modified to crush the shells of mussels and snails - and as such it can be difficult to distinguish native versus nonnative species based on a few simple characteristics. Nevertheless, the collection of nonnative species such as Asian carps should be reported to the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. Positive identification is crucial and for this reason we recommend retaining the specimen if possible or documenting the catch with photographs. Well-focused images that show the whole fish from various angles as well as close-ups of the head and fins are ideal. Additional information on identification of Asian and other nonnative carps has been compiled by the US Geological Survey and can be accessed online <http://fisc.er.usgs.gov/Carp_ID/index.html>. RISK RATING SUMMARY Relative Risk Rating: HIGH Numerical Score: 6 (on a 1-9 scale) Uncertainty: Moderate This Risk Evaluation summarizes much of the information previously compiled by the USFWS in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Galaxias
    Threatened Species Link www.tas.gov.au SPECIES MANAGEMENT PROFILE Galaxias auratus Golden Galaxias Group: Chordata (vertebrates), Actinopterygii (bony fish), Salmoniformes (salmonids), Galaxiidae Status: Threatened Species Protection Act 1995: rare Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999: Endangered Endemic Found only in Tasmania Status: A complete species management profile is not currently available for this species. Check for further information on this page and any relevant Activity Advice. Key Points Important: Is this species in your area? Do you need a permit? Ensure you’ve covered all the issues by checking the Planning Ahead page. Important: Different threatened species may have different requirements. For any activity you are considering, read the Activity Advice pages for background information and important advice about managing around the needs of multiple threatened species. Further information ​Check also for listing statement or notesheet pdf above (below the species image). Recovery Plan Cite as: Threatened Species Section (2021). Galaxias auratus (Golden Galaxias): Species Management Profile for Tasmania's Threatened Species Link. https://www.threatenedspecieslink.tas.gov.au/Pages/Golden-Galaxias.aspx. Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Tasmania. Accessed on 2/10/2021. Contact details: Threatened Species Section, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, GPO Box 44, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 7001. Phone (1300 368 550). Permit: A permit is required under the Tasmanian Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 to 'take' (which includes kill, injure, catch, damage, destroy and collect), keep, trade in or process any specimen or products of a listed species. Additional permits may also be required under other Acts or regulations to take, disturb or interfere with any form of wildlife or its products, (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambodian Journal of Natural History
    Cambodian Journal of Natural History Artisanal Fisheries Tiger Beetles & Herpetofauna Coral Reefs & Seagrass Meadows June 2019 Vol. 2019 No. 1 Cambodian Journal of Natural History Editors Email: [email protected], [email protected] • Dr Neil M. Furey, Chief Editor, Fauna & Flora International, Cambodia. • Dr Jenny C. Daltry, Senior Conservation Biologist, Fauna & Flora International, UK. • Dr Nicholas J. Souter, Mekong Case Study Manager, Conservation International, Cambodia. • Dr Ith Saveng, Project Manager, University Capacity Building Project, Fauna & Flora International, Cambodia. International Editorial Board • Dr Alison Behie, Australia National University, • Dr Keo Omaliss, Forestry Administration, Cambodia. Australia. • Ms Meas Seanghun, Royal University of Phnom Penh, • Dr Stephen J. Browne, Fauna & Flora International, Cambodia. UK. • Dr Ou Chouly, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State • Dr Chet Chealy, Royal University of Phnom Penh, University, USA. Cambodia. • Dr Nophea Sasaki, Asian Institute of Technology, • Mr Chhin Sophea, Ministry of Environment, Cambodia. Thailand. • Dr Martin Fisher, Editor of Oryx – The International • Dr Sok Serey, Royal University of Phnom Penh, Journal of Conservation, UK. Cambodia. • Dr Thomas N.E. Gray, Wildlife Alliance, Cambodia. • Dr Bryan L. Stuart, North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, USA. • Mr Khou Eang Hourt, National Authority for Preah Vihear, Cambodia. • Dr Sor Ratha, Ghent University, Belgium. Cover image: Chinese water dragon Physignathus cocincinus (© Jeremy Holden). The occurrence of this species and other herpetofauna in Phnom Kulen National Park is described in this issue by Geissler et al. (pages 40–63). News 1 News Save Cambodia’s Wildlife launches new project to New Master of Science in protect forest and biodiversity Sustainable Agriculture in Cambodia Agriculture forms the backbone of the Cambodian Between January 2019 and December 2022, Save Cambo- economy and is a priority sector in government policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS) Management Plan
    Indiana Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS) Management Plan Aruana caught by angler in Lake George, Lake County, Indiana Photo credit: Brian Breidert, IDNR Indiana Department of Natural Resources Funded by: Division of Fish and Wildlife Edited by: Phil Seng and Gwen White, D.J. Case & Associates, Mishawaka, Indiana October 1, 2003 Indiana Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS) Management Plan Table of Contents Page Executive summary 3 Introduction 6 Why should we be concerned? 6 Why are we hearing about more nuisance exotics? 6 Are all exotic species causing problems? 7 Why do some of these species become nuisances? 7 What principles should guide invasive species management in Indiana? 8 Which species are top priorities for management in Indiana? 8 Table 1. Aquatic nuisance species on the watch list and detected 9 Nuisance fish 10 Nuisance insects and crustaceans 13 Nuisance mussels and snails 14 Diseases, pathogens and parasites 15 Aquarium pets caught from Indiana waters 17 Nuisance plants 20 Which programs are engaged in management of invasive species? 23 What regulatory authorities control management of exotic species? 29 Federal role 30 Regional role 32 State role 33 Designing an integrated comprehensive regulatory approach 33 What can Hoosiers do to prevent and control the impacts of ANS? 40 Index to the strategic management plan 41 Description of strategic management plan 44 How will we know if we succeed? 58 Literature cited 60 Glossary of terms 63 List of agency and organization acronyms 64 Appendix A. List of introduced fish and crayfish 65 Appendix B. List of invasive aquatic plants 67 Appendix C. Priority list of ANS in the Great Lakes basin 69 Appendix D.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX M Common and Scientific Species Names
    Bay du Nord Development Project Environmental Impact Statement APPENDIX M Common and Scientific Species Names Bay du Nord Development Project Environmental Impact Statement Common and Species Names Common Name Scientific Name Fish Abyssal Skate Bathyraja abyssicola Acadian Redfish Sebastes fasciatus Albacore Tuna Thunnus alalunga Alewife (or Gaspereau) Alosa pseudoharengus Alfonsino Beryx decadactylus American Eel Anguilla rostrata American Plaice Hippoglossoides platessoides American Shad Alosa sapidissima Anchovy Engraulidae (F) Arctic Char (or Charr) Salvelinus alpinus Arctic Cod Boreogadus saida Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Thunnus thynnus Atlantic Cod Gadus morhua Atlantic Halibut Hippoglossus hippoglossus Atlantic Mackerel Scomber scombrus Atlantic Salmon (landlocked: Ouananiche) Salmo salar Atlantic Saury Scomberesox saurus Atlantic Silverside Menidia menidia Atlantic Sturgeon Acipenser oxyrhynchus oxyrhynchus Atlantic Wreckfish Polyprion americanus Barndoor Skate Dipturus laevis Basking Shark Cetorhinus maximus Bigeye Tuna Thunnus obesus Black Dogfish Centroscyllium fabricii Blue Hake Antimora rostrata Blue Marlin Makaira nigricans Blue Runner Caranx crysos Blue Shark Prionace glauca Blueback Herring Alosa aestivalis Boa Dragonfish Stomias boa ferox Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis Brown Bullhead Catfish Ameiurus nebulosus Burbot Lota lota Capelin Mallotus villosus Cardinal Fish Apogonidae (F) Chain Pickerel Esox niger Common Grenadier Nezumia bairdii Common Lumpfish Cyclopterus lumpus Common Thresher Shark Alopias vulpinus Crucian Carp
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology University of Michigan Ann Arbor.Michigan
    OCCASIONAL PAPERS OF THE MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ANN ARBOR.MICHIGAN THE CYPRINID DERMOSPHENOTIC AND THE SUBFAMILY RASBORINAE The Cyprinidac, the largest family of fishes, do not lend themselves readily to subfamily classification (Sagemehl, 1891; Regan, 1911 ; Ramaswami, 195513). Nevertheless, it is desirable to divide the family in some way, if only to facilitate investiga- tion. Since Gunther's (1868) basic review of the cyprinids the emphasis in classification has shifted from divisions that are rcadily differentiable to groupings intended to be more nearly phylogenetic. In the course of this change a subfamily classifica- tion has gradually been evolved. Among the most notable contributions to the development of present subfamily concepts are those of Berg (1912), Nikolsky (1954), and Banarescu (e-g. 1968a). The present paper is an attempt to clarify the nature and relationships of one cyprinid subfamily-the Rasborinae. (The group was termed Danioinae by Banarescu, 1968a. Nomen- claturally, Rasborina and Danionina were first used as "family group" names by Giinther; to my knowledge the first authors to include both Rasbora and Danio in a single subfamily with a name bascd on one of these genera were Weber and de Beaufort, 1916, who used Rasborinae.) In many cyprinids, as in most characins, the infraorbital bones form an interconnected series of laminar plates around the lower border of the eye, from the lacrimal in front to the dermo- sphenotic postcrodorsally. This series bears the infraorbital sensory canal, which is usually continued into the cranium above the dcrmosphenotic. The infraorbital chain of laminar plates is generally anchored in position relative to the skull anteriorly and 2 Gosline OCC.
    [Show full text]
  • 2219573-REP-Marine Assessment Report AR
    Appendix L – Marine Assessment GHD | Report for Hunter Water Corporation - Belmont Drought Response Desalination Plant, 2219573 Hunter Water Corporation Belmont Drought Response Desalination Plant Marine Environment Assessment Amendment Report July 2020 Table of contents 1. Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and structure of this report .................................................................................... 2 2. Project changes ............................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Key features of the amended Project .................................................................................. 4 3. Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Review of relevant legislation .............................................................................................. 7 3.2 Review of databases and searches ..................................................................................... 7 3.3 Review of previous marine ecology reports ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Biology of the Golden Galaxias
    Conservation Biology of the Golden Galaxias (Galaxias auratus) (Pisces: Galaxiidae) Scott Anthony Hardie A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the School of Zoology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 2007 Declaration of Originality This thesis does not contain any material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in the University of Tasmania nor any other university or institution. The material this thesis contains is, to the best of my knowledge, original except where due acknowledgement is made. Mr Scott A. Hardie June 2007 Statement of Authority of Access This thesis may be reproduced, archived, and communicated in any material form in whole or in part by the University of Tasmania or its agents, and may be made available for loan and copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Mr Scott A. Hardie June 2007 i Statement of Co-authorship The following people and institutions contributed to the publication (or submission for publication) of some of the work undertaken as part of this thesis: Preface Candidate*† (96%), Leon A. Barmuta (2%), Robert W. G. White* (2%) Chapter 2. Candidate*† (82%), Jean E. Jackson† (6%), Leon A. Barmuta* (10%), Robert W. G. White* (2%) Chapter 3. Candidate* (82%), Leon A. Barmuta* (14%), Robert W. G. White* (4%) Chapter 4. Candidate*† (85%), Leon A. Barmuta* (13%), Robert W. G. White* (2%) Chapter 6. Candidate*† (85%), Leon A. Barmuta* (13%), Robert W. G. White* (2%) Chapter 7. Candidate*† (80%), Stephen B. Pyecroft‡ (10%), Leon A. Barmuta* (8%), Robert W. G. White* (2%) *School of Zoology and Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 5, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia †Inland Fisheries Service, PO Box 288, Moonah, Tasmania 7009, Australia ‡Animal Health Laboratory, Department of Primary Industries and Water, PO Box 46, Kings Meadows, Tasmania 7249, Australia L.A.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of the Critically Endangered Freshwater Fish Species, the Clanwilliam Sandfish (Labeo Seeberi)
    Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of the critically endangered freshwater fish species, the Clanwilliam sandfish (Labeo seeberi) By Shaun Francois Lesch Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Faculty of Natural Science at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Dr C. Rhode Co-supervisor: Dr R. Slabbert Department of Genetics December 2020 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration: By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: December 2020 Copyright © 2020 Stellenbosch University All Rights Reserved i Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract: Labeo spp. are large freshwater fish found throughout southern Asia, the Middle East and Africa. The genus is characterised by specialised structures around the mouth and lips making it adapted to herbivorous feeding (algae and detritus). Clanwilliam sandfish (Labeo seeberi) was once widespread throughout its natural habitat (Olifants-Doring River system), but significant decreases in population size have seen them become absent in the Olifants River and retreat to the headwaters in the tributaries of the Doring River. Currently sandfish are confined to three populations namely the Oorlogskloof Nature Reserve (OKNR), Rietkuil (Riet) and Bos, with OKNR being the largest of the three and deemed the species sanctuary.
    [Show full text]