DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparing DNA Test Results Why Take a DNA Test? Family Legend

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comparing DNA Test Results Why Take a DNA Test? Family Legend Comparing DNA Test Results Why take a DNA test? Family Legend... My Father’s Side: My Mother’s Side: ● Paternal Grandfather - ● Maternal Grandfather - ○ Born in Puerto Rico ○ Born in Virginia ○ Last name originates from Spain ○ Last name originates from England ○ His father was from Spain (very white, blue ○ Old Virginia family, claims of 1607 eyes) migration ● Paternal Grandmother - ● Maternal Grandmother - ○ Born in Puerto Rico ○ Born in Virginia ○ Last name originates from Spain ○ Last name originates from Germany ○ No knowledge of her family ○ Family been in Virginia for a long time Father’s Genetic My Potential Mother’s Genetic Makeup Genetic Makeup Makeup American 13.1 6.5 0 Ashkenazi Jewish 0.9 0.4 0 Central / South Asian 0.3 0.2 0 East Asian 0.7 0.4 0 European 59.0 79.0 99.0 Sub-Saharan African 15.7 7.8 0 West Asian / North African 3.4 2.1 0.8 Unassigned 6.9 3.6 0.2 Family Tree DNA ● Cost: $91.95 ● Sample Sent: September 22 ● Sample Received: September 29 ● Results Ready: October 19 Family Finder, Chromosome Browser myOrigins Ancient Origins My Potential My Actual Family Genetic Makeup Tree DNA Results American 6.6 5.0 (-1.6) Ashkenazi Jewish 0.5 0 (-0.5) Central / South Asian 0.2 0 (-0.2) East Asian 0.4 0 (-0.4) European 79.0 82 (+3.0) Sub-Saharan African 7.9 9 (+1.1) West Asian / North African 2.1 2 (-0.1) Unassigned 3.6 2 (-1.6) AncestryDNA ● Cost: $99 (each additional test is $89) ● Sample Sent: December 4 ● Sample Received: December 12 ● Results Ready: December 26 DNA Matches Thrulines Family Tree My Potential My Actual Genetic Makeup Ancestry Results American 6.6 7.0 (+1.6) Ashkenazi Jewish 0.5 0 (-0.5) Central / South Asian 0.2 0 (-0.2) East Asian 0.4 0 (-0.4) European 79.0 84.0 (+5.0) Sub-Saharan African 7.9 9.0 (+1.1) West Asian / North African 2.1 0 (-2.1) Unassigned 3.6 0 (-3.6) 23andMe ● Cost: $199 (Ancestry $99 + Health $125) ● Sample Sent: May 22 ● Sample Received: May 24 ● Results Ready: June 2 Skin Color Detached Earlobes DNA Relatives Ancestors My Potential My Actual Genetic Makeup 23andMe Results American 6.6 6.4 (-0.2) Ashkenazi Jewish 0.5 0.1 (-0.4) Central / South Asian 0.2 0.2 East Asian 0.4 0.1 (-0.3) European 79.0 79.1 (+0.1) Sub-Saharan African 7.9 9.9 (+2.0) West Asian / North African 2.1 1.9 (-0.2) Unassigned 3.6 2.3 (-1.3) Father’s Genetic My Potential My Actual Mother’s Genetic Makeup Genetic Makeup 23andMe Results Makeup Ashkenazi Jewish 0.9 0.5 0.1 (-0.4) 0 British & Irish 0.8 15.8 9.1 (-6.7) 28.8 Eastern European 0 0.3 0 (-0.3) 0.5 French & German 1.1 25.0 31.6 (+6.6) 48.9 Italian 0.7 0.2 0 (-0.2) 0.1 Scandinavian 0 1.5 2.2 (+0.7) 3.0 Spanish & Portuguese 43.3 21.7 22.7 (+1.0) 0 Misc. Euro. 13.1 15.4 13.6 (-1.8) 17.6 American 5.0 7.0 6.4 Ashkenazi Jewish 0 0 0.1 Central / South Asian 0 0 0.2 East Asian 0 0 0.1 European 82 84.0 79.1 Sub-Saharan African 9 9.0 9.9 West Asian / North African 2 0 1.9 Unassigned 2 0 2.3 GEDMatch Comparison Compiled Results Privacy 23 & Me Ancestry FamilyTreeDNA ● Barcode ● Barcode ● User ID number ● No one has access to both ● No one has access to both ● Need to give consent for third email + genetic info email + genetic info parties to access info ● Partnerships - can opt out ● Cannot turn off your ● Ambiguous about ownership “Consent to Research” ● Partnerships - need to get your consent first “We believe that you own your data” Retention 23 & Me Ancestry FamilyTreeDNA ● Store your sample ● Store your sample ● Store your sample so you can ● They’ll ask you your ● You can delete your test order more tests later preference results ● Once you give it to them, it’s ● Store for 1-10 years ● Need to call Member Services theirs ● Need to submit request to to have sample destroyed ● It can’t be destroyed or have sample destroyed returned to you Other Services ● Helix/Genographic Project (National Geographic) ~ Geno2.0 ● MyHeritage ● Living DNA (British results) ● HomeDNA ● Ancestry by DNA ● Human Genome Project (NIH) ● GEDmatch So what do you do with this information? Overall Impressions References ● https://www.technologyreview.com/s/610233/2017-was-the-year-consumer-dna-testing-blew-up/ ● https://www.yourdnaguide.com ● http://thednageek.com/who-owns-your-genetic-information/ ● https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2018/07/31/ancestry-andme-others-say-they-will-follow- these-rules-when-giving-dna-data-businesses-or-police/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e138df259408 ● https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Privacy-Best-Practices-for-Consumer-Genetic-Testing- Services-FINAL.pdf ● https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/family-tree-dna-will-never-sell-your-genetic-data- 300562348.html ● https://www.businessinsider.com/best-dna-test-23andme-ancestry-national-geographic-2017-4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Genetic Testing and the Implications for Future Therapies  Genetic Testing for Inherited Marrow Failure
    4/24/2017 Personalized Medicine: What This Talk Will Cover Genetic Testing and the Implications for Future Therapies Genetic testing for inherited marrow failure . General background: What are gene mutations? . Risk and severity: Do all people with inherited mutations develop disease? National Patient and Living with . How does medical genetic testing differ from commercially available testing? Aplastic Anemia, Family Conference MDS or PNH Las Vegas, NV April 22, 2017 Cytogenetic testing in Bone Marrow Failure Genomic profiling of bone marrow cells in MDS and AA for acquired mutations Implications for diagnosis, prognosis and therapies Katherine R. Calvo, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Center National Institutes of Health Benefits and Limitations of Genetic Testing and Genomic Profiling Bethesda, Maryland Bone marrow failure syndromes: How can genetic testing help to distinguish and guide therapy? AA/PNH Part One: PNH LGL Autoimmune SDS Disease: AA MS, IBD, uveitis, HYPOCELLULAR Genetic Testing for DM type 1, etc. TELOMERE MDS (DKC) GATA2 MDS AML Inherited Marrow Failure FA Acquired AA SDS AA, aplastic anaemia; AID, autoimmune disease; AML, acute myelogenous leukemia; DKC, dyskeratosis congenita; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; LGL, large granular lymphocyte leukemia; GATA2, Gata2 deficiency; FA, Fanconi anemia; SDS, Shwachman–Diamond syndrome; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; MS, multiple sclerosis; DM, diabetes mellitus; PNH, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria Modified from Young NS, et al. Blood 2006;108:2509–19
    [Show full text]
  • Family Tree Dna Complaints
    Family Tree Dna Complaints If palladous or synchronal Zeus usually atrophies his Shane wadsets haggishly or beggar appealingly and soberly, how Peronist is Kaiser? Mongrel and auriferous Bradford circlings so paradigmatically that Clifford expatiates his dischargers. Ropier Carter injects very indigestibly while Reed remains skilful and topfull. Family finder results will receive an answer Of torch the DNA testing companies FamilyTreeDNA does not score has strong marks from its users In summer both 23andMe and AncestryDNA score. Sent off as a tree complaints about the aclu attorney vera eidelman wrote his preteen days you hand parts to handle a tree complaints and quickly build for a different charts and translation and. Family Tree DNA Reviews Legit or Scam Reviewopedia. Want to family tree dna family tree complaints. Everything about new england or genetic information contained some reason or personal data may share dna family complaints is the results. Family Tree DNA 53 Reviews Laboratory Testing 1445 N. It yourself help to verify your family modest and excellent helpful clues to inform. A genealogical relationship is integrity that appears on black family together It's documented by how memory and traditional genealogical research. These complaints are dna family complaints. The private history website Ancestrycom is selling a new DNA testing service called AncestryDNA But the DNA and genetic data that Ancestrycom collects may be. Available upon request to family tree dna complaints about family complaints and. In the authors may be as dna family tree complaints and visualise the mixing over the match explanation of your genealogy testing not want organized into the raw data that is less.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canada's History Beginner's Guide to Genetic
    THE CANADA’S HISTORY BEGINNER’S GUIDE TO GENETIC GENEALOGY Read in sequence or browse as you see fit by clicking on any navigation item below. Introduction C. How to proceed A. To test or not Testing strategies for beginners Reasons for testing Recovery guide for those who tested and were underwhelmed Bogus reasons for not testing Fear of the test D. Case studies “The tests are crap” Confirming a hypothesis with autosomal DNA Price Refuting a hypothesis with autosomal DNA Substantive reasons for not testing Confirming a hypothesis with Y DNA Privacy concerns Developing (and then confirming) a hypothesis with Unexpected findings autosomal DNA Developing a completely unexpected hypothesis from B. The ABCs of DNA testing autosomal DNA The four major testing companies (and others) Four types of DNA and three major genetic genealogy tests E. Assorted observations on interpreting DNA tests Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) Y DNA F. More resources Autosomal DNA (atDNA) Selected recent publications X DNA Basic information about genetic genealogy Summarizing the tests Blogs by notable genetic genealogists (a selective list) Tools and utilities © 2019 Paul Jones The text of this guide is protected by Canadian copyright law and published here with permission of the author. Unless otherwise noted, copyright of every image resides with the image’s owner. You should not use any of these images for any purpose without the owner’s express authorization unless this is already granted in a cited license. For further information or to report errors or omissions, please contact Paul Jones. CANADASHISTORY.CA ONLINE SPECIAL FEATURE 2019 1 Introduction The “bestest best boy in the land” recently had his DNA tested.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing the Genealogy Giants: Ancestry.Com, Familysearch, Findmypast and Myheritage Presenter: Sunny Morton
    Comparing the Genealogy Giants: Ancestry.com, FamilySearch, Findmypast and MyHeritage Presenter: Sunny Morton Why you should know about all of these sites (even if you use one most often): • Each offers unique content and tools. • All continue to add new records, develop new tools and collect more user-submitted data. • No single website has everything you’ll need or want as you build your tree over time. • Each site offers individual tree building except FamilySearch, which uses a communal tree. • Free access options are available, with access to most features of these sites! Quick Facts & Highlights Ancestry.com FamilySearch.org Findmypast.com MyHeritage.com Annual $198—$298 USD Free $179 USD $129-299 USD subscription Geographic US, Australia/NZ, US, Canada, Mexico, England, Scotland, Scandinavia, England, record Canada, UK, Central/South Wales, Ireland, Germany strengths France, Germany, America, most of US/Canada, Italy, Mexico, Europe, some of Australia/New Zealand Sweden Africa and Asia Featured US census special Vital records and all Parish records: Church Scandinavian collections, historical schedules and other core of England and Germany, England, Jewish record types state- territorial genealogical records Catholic, newspapers censuses, city directories *Prices subject to change. These figures aren’t adjusted for variations in defining records and methods of counting unindexed historical records. Figures cited from company websites and additional data obtained from company representatives. Note: AncestryDNA customers without an Ancestry subscription only have access to some of the site features. What do all the sites have in common at the top membership levels? • Ability to search indexed and unindexed historical records • Core records: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Genealogy Genetic Genealogy
    Family History Research Using Genetic Genealogy Genetic Genealogy ● DNA Testing Companies ● Three most common types of testing using DNA ● Y-DNA ● mtDNA ● Autosomal DNA (atDNA) (including X-dna) ● DNA Analysis Tools Genetic Genealogy ● Main testing companies to choose from: ● Family Tree DNA - www.familytreedna.com ● Y-dna ($139USD), mtDNA ($79-199USD), atDNA ($79, includes ethnicity, not medically focussed) ● Accepts transfers from some other testing companies (possibly free, or ~$19USD) ● 23 and ME – www.23andme.com ● atDNA ($249CDN, includes ethnicity, medically focussed) ● Ancestry – www.dna.ancestry.com ● atDNA ($149CDN, includes ethnicity, not medically focussed) ● MyHeritage - www.myheritage.com ● atDNA $79USD, accepts dna transfers for free ● LivingDNA - www.livingdna.com ● atDNA $143CDN, plans to accept transfers in the near future ● *https://isogg.org/wiki/Autosomal_DNA_testing_comparison_chart (comparison details) Genetic Genealogy ● Three most common types of testing using DNA ● Y-DNA ● mtDNA ● Autosomal DNA (atDNA) (including X-dna) ● Each tests a different type of dna and they CANNOT be compared to each other ! Don’t compare apples to oranges! Genetic Genealogy ● Y-DNA for direct male line (test for men only) ● mtDNA for direct female line (test for men and women) Genetic Genealogy ● Y-DNA mtDNA mtDNA Inheritance male / female Genetic Genealogy ● Y-DNA genetic testing ● The y chromosome is only passed down from a man to his son. ● Every man has a y chromosome that has been passed down to him from thousands and thousands of generations of fathers to sons going back into the dawn of humanity (National Genographic Project). ● Since the start of the use of surnames fathers have tended to pass on their surname along with a y chromosome ● “Surname” projects have become very popular as people try to link together groups of men with a certain surname.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching the Internet for Genealogical and Family History Records
    Searching the Internet for Genealogical and Family History Records Welcome Spring 2019 1 Joseph Sell Gain confidence in your searching Using Genealogy sources to find records Course Objectives Improve your search skills Use research libraries and repositories 2 Bibliography • Built on the course George King has presented over several years • “The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Genealogy” Christine Rose and Kay Germain Ingalls • “The Sources – A Guidebook to American Genealogy” –(ed) Loretto Dennis Szuco and Sandra Hargreaves Luebking • “The Genealogy Handbook” – Ellen Galford • “Genealogy Online for Dummies” – Matthew L Helm and April Leigh Helm • “Genealogy Online” – Elizabeth Powell Crowe • “The Everything Guide to Online Genealogy” – Kimberly Powell • “Discover the 101 Genealogy Websites That Take the Cake in 2015” – David A Frywell (Family Tree Magazine Sept 2015 page 16) 3 Bibliography (Continued) • “Social Networking for Genealogist”, Drew Smith • “The Complete Beginner’s Guide to Genealogy, the Internet, and Your Genealogy Computer Program”, Karen Clifford • “Advanced Genealogy – Research Techniques” George G Morgan and Drew Smith • “101 of the Best Free Websites for Climbing Your Family Tree” – Nancy Hendrickson • “AARP Genealogy Online tech to connect” – Matthew L Helm and April Leigh Helm • Family Tree Magazine 4 • All records are the product of human endeavor • To err is human • Not all records are online; most General records are in local repositories Comments • Find, check, and verify the accuracy of all information • The internet is a dynamic environment with content constantly changing 5 • Tip 1: Start with the basic facts, first name, last name, a date, and a place. • Tip 2: Learn to use control to filter hits.
    [Show full text]
  • 4150 Cousins: What 7 DNA Ancestry Tests Can Tell You About Your Kin by Danielle Nadeau a Thesis Presented to the University Of
    4150 Cousins: What 7 DNA Ancestry Tests Can Tell You About Your Kin by Danielle Nadeau A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in Public Issues Anthropology Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2015 © Danielle Nadeau 2015 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this research paper. I authorize the University of Waterloo to lend this research paper to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. Danielle Nadeau December 22, 2015 ii Abstract This thesis presents the results of seven commercialized DNA ancestry tests that are all available to the public, for under $400 Canadian dollars each. This research is conducted to explore the use of commercialized DNA ancestry tests. The results from each test are compared in order to determine what they are able to tell a customer. The tests used are not the only tests available, but are chosen because of their popularity, price, and what they claim to be able to report to their customer. I find the databases that the tests include online to ‘find relatives’, who are other customers having the same Haplogroup or another matching genetic identifier, to be the most troublesome aspect of the results. Specifically, it is important for the public to clearly understand that these tests are not as conclusive as they are advertised to be, so that they are not misled in thinking that the tests have the potential to show things with certainty that they cannot. iii Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Dna Test Kit Showdown
    DNA TEST KIT SHOWDOWN Presented by Melissa Potoczek-Fiskin and Kate Mills for the Alsip-Merrionette Park Public Library Zoom Program on Thursday, May 28, 2020 For additional information from Alsip Librarians: 708.926.7024 or [email protected] Y DNA? Reasons to Test • Preserve and learn about the oldest living generation’s DNA information • Learn about family health history or genomic medicine • Further your genealogy research • Help with adoption research • Curiosity, fun (there are tests for wine preference and there are even DNA tests for dogs and cats) Y DNA? Reasons Not to Test • Privacy • Security • Health Scare • Use by Law Enforcement • Finding Out Something You Don’t Want to Know DNA Definitions (the only science in the program!) • Y (yDNA) Chromosome passed from father to son for paternal, male lines • X Chromosome, women inherit from both parents, men from their mothers • Mitochondrial (mtDNA), passed on to both men and women from their mothers (*New Finding*) • Autosomal (atDNA), confirms known or suspected relationships, connects cousins, determines ethnic makeup, the standard test for most DNA kits • Haplogroup is a genetic population or group of people who share a common ancestor. Haplogroups extend pedigree journeys back thousand of generations AncestryDNA • Ancestry • Saliva Sample • Results 6-8 Weeks • DNA Matching • App: Yes (The We’re Related app has been discontinued) • Largest database, approx. 16 million • 1000 regions • Tests: AncestryDNA: $99, AncestryDNA + Traits: $119, AncestryHealth Core: $149 Kate’s
    [Show full text]
  • The Social-Construct of Race and Ethnicity: One’S Self-Identity After a DNA Test
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Dissertations Graduate College 4-2019 The Social-Construct of Race and Ethnicity: One’s Self-Identity after a DNA Test Kathryn Ann Wilson Western Michigan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations Part of the Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons Recommended Citation Wilson, Kathryn Ann, "The Social-Construct of Race and Ethnicity: One’s Self-Identity after a DNA Test" (2019). Dissertations. 3405. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/3405 This Dissertation-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SOCIAL-CONSTRUCT OF RACE AND ETHNICITY: ONES’ SELF-IDENTITY AFTER A DNA TEST by Kathryn Wilson A dissertation submitted to the Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Educational Leadership, Research and Technology Western Michigan University April 2019 Doctoral Committee: Gary Miron, Ph.D., Chair D. Eric Archer, Ph.D. June Gothberg, Ph.D. Copyright by Kathryn Wilson 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Professor Gary Miron, for his continued belief that I would find my passion and complete this dissertation. Also, I would like to thank my dissertation advisory committee chair Professor Gary Miron, Ph.D., and committee members Assistant Professor D. Eric Archer, Ph.D., and Assistant Professor June Gothberg, Ph.D. for their advice and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracing Ancestral Lines in the 1700S Using DNA, Part One
    Tracing Ancestral Lines in the 1700s using DNA, Part One Tim Janzen, MD E-mail: [email protected] The science of genetics has changed dramatically in the past 60 years since James Watson and Francis Crick first discovered and described DNA in 1953. Genetics is increasingly being used to help people trace their family histories. The first major application of genetics to a family history puzzle was in 1998 when researchers established that a male Jefferson, either Thomas Jefferson or a close male relative, fathered at least one of Sally Hemings’ children. The first major company to utilize DNA for family history purposes was Family Tree DNA, which was founded by Bennett Greenspan in 2000. Initially the only types of testing that were done were Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA testing. Over the past 10 years, autosomal DNA testing has moved into a prominent role in genetic genealogy. 23andMe was the first company to offer autosomal DNA testing for genealogical purposes. Their Relative Finder feature (now renamed as DNA Relatives) was quite popular when it was introduced in 2009. This feature allows people to discover genetic cousins they likely had never been in contact with previously. In 2010 Family Tree DNA introduced an autosomal DNA test called Family Finder which is a competing product to 23andMe’s test. In 2012 a third major autosomal DNA test called AncestryDNA was introduced by Ancestry.com. It has been quite popular due its low price and the availability of extensive pedigree charts for many of the people who have been tested by Ancestry.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Driggs Is Not Josias Drake, Jr
    Joseph Driggs is Not Josias Drake, Jr. Joseph Driggs of East Haddam, Connecticut died between 31 October 1748 and 15 November 1748 (dates of his will and probate). He was buried in the Congregational Church Cemetery in Millington, Connecticut. Is first appearance in any confirmed record is in 1709 when he is listed in a Company of Connecticut Troops returning from Woods Hole, near Lake George, New York, after an expedition against Canada (then French). He married Elizabeth Martin, a widow of Joseph Bourn, on 13 September 1716 in Middletown, Connecticut. They had five children between 1716 and 1724. Joseph later married Martha Holland. Joseph Driggs left many descendants; many of them are recorded in two volumes. The first, Driggs Family History , by Howard R. Driggs, was published in 1959. The second, Driggs Family History Volume 2 , followed in 1971 and was authored by L. Lynne Driggs, Harry Stoddard Driggs, with Howard R. Driggs given a posthumous acknowledgement (he had died in 1963). Both volumes claim that Joseph Driggs was born Josias Drake, Jr., the son of Josias Janszen Drats and Aeltje Brouwer who lived at Gowanus, Long Island, and apparently later at Newtown. Although I will not go into it now, it should be noted that both volumes also have incorrectly left the impression with some readers that Josias Janszen Drats, was a member of the De Raet family. This claim is unsubstantiated and completely incorrect. As it turns out, the claim that Joseph Driggs was born Josias Drake, Jr. can now be confirmed as completely incorrect. The tale, as told in the Driggs Family History volumes and since repeated by some others, is that in about 1703, a young man washed ashore on a sand bar at Saybrook, Connecticut.
    [Show full text]
  • Simple Displaying Method for Genealogy with Assisted
    Simple Displaying Method for Genealogy with Assisted Reproductive Technologies Seiji Sugiyama, Daisuke Yokozawa, Atsushi Ikuta, Satoshi Hiratsuka, Miyuki Shibata, Tohru Matsuura To cite this version: Seiji Sugiyama, Daisuke Yokozawa, Atsushi Ikuta, Satoshi Hiratsuka, Miyuki Shibata, et al.. Sim- ple Displaying Method for Genealogy with Assisted Reproductive Technologies. 14th Computer In- formation Systems and Industrial Management (CISIM), Sep 2015, Warsaw, Poland. pp.204-215, 10.1007/978-3-319-24369-6_17. hal-01444466 HAL Id: hal-01444466 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01444466 Submitted on 24 Jan 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License Simple Displaying Method for Genealogy with Assisted Reproductive Technologies Seiji Sugiyama1, Daisuke Yokozawa1, Atsushi Ikuta1, Satoshi Hiratsuka2, Miyuki Shibata1, and Tohru Matsuura3 1 Otani University, Kyoto, JAPAN, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2 Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, JAPAN, [email protected] 3 Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, JAPAN, [email protected] Abstract. In this research, a new layout style, `Nodes of E®ects and/or Way through for TYing Particular Elements (NeWTYPe)', for displaying genealogy with assisted reproductive technologies (ART) that include a sperm/ovum donor and/or a surrogate mother using our WHIteBasE method is proposed.
    [Show full text]