Section 8 the Invasion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Section 8 the Invasion SECTION 8 THE INVASION Contents Introduction and key findings ........................................................................................... 3 The military Coalition ....................................................................................................... 4 The UK contribution ................................................................................................... 5 Command and control ............................................................................................... 7 The US campaign plan .............................................................................................. 9 The UK’s planned role in offensive operations ........................................................ 12 The invasion ................................................................................................................... 15 The decision to take military action .......................................................................... 15 The Chief of the Defence Staff’s Directive ............................................................... 16 Offensive operations begin ...................................................................................... 18 The launch of the main offensive ............................................................................. 19 The air campaign ..................................................................................................... 27 The maritime campaign ........................................................................................... 28 23 and 24 March: UK forces reach Basra ................................................................ 29 25 to 27 March: an operational pause ..................................................................... 33 28 March: one week in ............................................................................................. 44 29 to 31 March: events ............................................................................................ 48 1 to 3 April ................................................................................................................ 57 4 April ....................................................................................................................... 63 US forces enter Baghdad ........................................................................................ 64 The fall of Basra ....................................................................................................... 68 The collapse of the Iraqi regime .............................................................................. 77 The immediate aftermath ......................................................................................... 81 The end of combat operations ................................................................................. 84 UK influence on the planning and conduct of the military campaign ....................... 85 1 The Report of the Iraq Inquiry The transition to post-conflict operations ....................................................................... 90 Phase IV military planning papers ........................................................................... 90 The relationship between the UK military and ORHA ............................................ 102 Extension of the UK AO ......................................................................................... 106 The military Statement of Requirement for a UK AOR ...........................................111 Alignment of the UK AOR with ORHA’s southern region ....................................... 115 Lessons ........................................................................................................................ 128 2 8 | The invasion Introduction and key findings 1. This Section addresses the framework for and conduct of UK combat operations, specifically: • the role of the UK in the combat phase of the military campaign; • transition to post-conflict operations in Iraq; and • the establishment of the UK’s post-conflict Area of Responsibility (AOR) in the South. 2. The Inquiry has not addressed the detailed operational and tactical conduct of the military campaign. 3. A number of issues which are relevant to this Section are addressed in other Sections of the Report, including: • The UK’s military planning for the invasion is addressed in Sections 6.1 and 6.2, including decisions about the forces to be committed, assessments of Iraq’s conventional capabilities, the regime’s intentions, the possible responses of the regime and the Iraqi people to a military invasion, and the legal framework for the conduct of operations. • The UK’s assessment of Iraq’s chemical and biological weapons (CBW) and its ability to deploy them, including its ballistic missile capabilities, are addressed in Section 4.1. • Lord Goldsmith’s advice on the legal basis for military action is addressed in Section 5. • The arrangements made to provide equipment to forces deploying for operations in Iraq, are addressed in Section 6.3. • Planning for post-conflict operations, including the military presence and role, which was described as Phase IV of the campaign plan, is addressed in Sections 6.4 and 6.5. • The UK Government’s decision to take military action is described in Section 3.8. • The MOD’s handling of military personnel issues, including casualties, is considered in Sections 16.1 to 16.4. • The search for weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq is addressed in Section 4.4. • The evolution of the US/UK non-military relationship, political developments in Iraq and the adoption of resolution 1483 (2003) are addressed in Section 9.1. 3 The Report of the Iraq Inquiry Key findings • It took less than a month to achieve the departure of Saddam Hussein and the fall of Baghdad. • The decision to advance into Basra was made by military commanders on the ground. • The UK was unprepared for the media response to the initial difficulties. It had also underestimated the need for sustained communication of key strategic messages to inform public opinion about the objectives and progress of the military campaign, including in Iraq. • For any future military operations, arrangements to agree and disseminate key strategic messages need to be put in place, in both London and on the ground, before operations begin. • The UK acceded to the post-invasion US request that it assume leadership of a military Area of Responsibility (AOR) encompassing four provinces in southern Iraq, a position it then held for six years, without a formal Ministerial decision and without carrying out a robust analysis of the strategic implications for the UK or the military’s capacity to support the UK’s potential obligations in the region. The military Coalition 4. The combat phase of military operations is widely judged to have been a success. The Iraqi armed forces were defeated so rapidly by the Coalition that US forces were in Baghdad and Saddam Hussein’s regime had fallen by 14 April 2003. On 1 May, just six weeks after launching the invasion, President Bush declared that major combat operations had ended. 5. Those who deployed on the operation and those who planned and supported it, military and civilian, deserve recognition for what they achieved. 6. Coalition Forces were led by General Tommy Franks, the Commander in Chief US Central Command (CENTCOM). The Coalition campaign was designated Operation Iraqi Freedom. 7. Gen Franks recorded in his memoir that, by the third week of March 2003, “total strength in all components – including our Gulf State Coalition allies in Kuwait” numbered 292,000 individuals, including ground forces of around 170,000.1 8. At a press briefing on 18 March 2003, Mr Richard Boucher, the US State Department Spokesman, gave a “definitive list” of 30 countries2 that had agreed to be part of the Coalition, each of which was “contributing in the ways that it deems 1 Franks T & McConnell M. American Soldier. HarperCollins, 2004. 2 Afghanistan, Albania, Australia, Azerbaijan, Colombia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, the Netherlands, Nicaragua, the Philippines, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Turkey, the UK and Uzbekistan. 4 8 | The invasion the most appropriate”.3 Mr Boucher said that “almost all” of the 30 were “associated somehow militarily with the action”. A further 15 countries, which he did not list, were “co-operating”, for example by offering “defensive assets in the event that Saddam resorts to the use of weapons of mass destruction”. 9. The MOD’s first account and analysis of the operation, published in July 2003, gave the total number of Coalition Forces as 467,000.4 The MOD also recorded that “some 20 countries offered or provided military forces or use of military bases” and “many others provided crucial assistance with intelligence, logistics and the deployment of combat units”. 10. According to Dr Condoleezza Rice, President Bush’s National Security Advisor in March 2003, a total of 33 countries provided troops in support of the military operation.5 11. President Bush put the number of countries providing “crucial support – from the use of naval and air bases, to help with intelligence and logistics” at more than 35.6 The UK contribution 12. UK military operations in Iraq between 2003 and 2009 were known by the codename Operation TELIC. 13. At the start of Op TELIC, the UK deployed a large scale ground force and medium scale air and
Recommended publications
  • Suez 1956 24 Planning the Intervention 26 During the Intervention 35 After the Intervention 43 Musketeer Learning 55
    Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd i 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iiii 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East Louise Kettle 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iiiiii 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Edinburgh University Press is one of the leading university presses in the UK. We publish academic books and journals in our selected subject areas across the humanities and social sciences, combining cutting-edge scholarship with high editorial and production values to produce academic works of lasting importance. For more information visit our website: edinburghuniversitypress.com © Louise Kettle, 2018 Edinburgh University Press Ltd The Tun – Holyrood Road, 12(2f) Jackson’s Entry, Edinburgh EH8 8PJ Typeset in 11/1 3 Adobe Sabon by IDSUK (DataConnection) Ltd, and printed and bound in Great Britain. A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 1 4744 3795 0 (hardback) ISBN 978 1 4744 3797 4 (webready PDF) ISBN 978 1 4744 3798 1 (epub) The right of Louise Kettle to be identifi ed as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, and the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 (SI No. 2498). 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iivv 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Contents Acknowledgements vii 1. Learning from History 1 Learning from History in Whitehall 3 Politicians Learning from History 8 Learning from the History of Military Interventions 9 How Do We Learn? 13 What is Learning from History? 15 Who Learns from History? 16 The Learning Process 18 Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East 21 2.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSFORMING the BRITISH ARMY an Update
    TRANSFORMING THE BRITISH ARMY An Update © Crown copyright July 2013 Images Army Picture Desk, Army Headquarters Designed by Design Studio ADR002930 | TRANSFORMING THE BRITISH ARMY 2013 TRANSFORMING THE BRITISH ARMY 2013 | 1 Contents Foreword 1 Army 2020 Background 2 The Army 2020 Design 3 Formation Basing and Names 4 The Reaction Force 6 The Adaptable Force 8 Force Troops Command 10 Transition to new Structures 14 Training 15 Personnel 18 Defence Engagement 21 Firm Base 22 Support to Homeland Resilience 23 Equipment 24 Reserves 26 Army Communication Strategic Themes 28 | TRANSFORMING THE BRITISH ARMY 2013 TRANSFORMING THE BRITISH ARMY 2013 | 1 Foreword General Sir Peter Wall GCB CBE ADC Gen Chief of the General Staff We have made significant progress in refining the detail of Army 2020 since it was announced in July 2012. It is worth taking stock of what has been achieved so far, and ensuring that our direction of travel continues to be understood by the Army. This comprehensive update achieves this purpose well and should be read widely. I wish to highlight four particular points: • Our success in establishing Defence Engagement as a core Defence output. Not only will this enable us to make a crucial contribution to conflict prevention, but it will enhance our contingent capability by developing our understanding. It will also give the Adaptable Force a challenging focus in addition to enduring operations and homeland resilience. • We must be clear that our capacity to influence overseas is founded upon our credibility as a war-fighting Army, capable of projecting force anywhere in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Monday Volume 550 17 September 2012 No. 45 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 17 September 2012 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2012 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 619 17 SEPTEMBER 2012 620 development should not be approved in the green belt, House of Commons and boundaries should be altered only in exceptional circumstances. Monday 17 September 2012 Simon Danczuk: As we all know, Rochdale is surrounded by some of the most beautiful countryside in the United The House met at half-past Two o’clock Kingdom—[Interruption.] Can the Secretary of State assure me and residents of Rochdale that we will not PRAYERS have to swap some of our green-belt land for house building? [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Mr Pickles: For a moment I thought the hon. Gentleman was going to put that to the vote; I would have been on BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS his side. The Planning Inspectorate looked at Rochdale QUEEN’S SPEECH (ANSWER TO ADDRESS) metropolitan borough council’s core strategy, and as the hon. Gentleman will know, consultation ends next The VICE-CHAMBERLAIN OF THE HOUSEHOLD reported to the House, That Her Majesty, having been attended Monday. It was extended to allow consideration of the with its Address of 17th May, was pleased to receive the proposed release of 55 hectares of green-belt land on same very graciously and give the following Answer: the South Heywood development, but that has now been excluded from the core strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Order 54 of 1903
    Intentionally blank Intentionally blank Intentionally blank Intentionally blank It is with great pleasure that we Foreword by the Honorary President welcome Lt Gen Sir Freddie Maj Gen Peter Currie CB Viggers, a distinguished Gunner, a soldiers’ soldier and now Black Rod, as our new Honorary If one was a pessimist one would with the Association has been President. Gen Freddie is looking no doubt be in the depths of an undiluted pleasure. I have forward to joining us at our next despair at the moment: the credit also found it inspirational, in the Reunion in Larkhill on 24th April crunch is hitting our pockets, the sense that what you have done 2010. exchange rate makes holidays in building and holding together hideously expensive, global this tight knit group of people is a Let us not forget our members warming is said to be threatening marvellous example to others of who are currently in Afghanistan our future, the sense of drift in what can be achieved in the name and other operational areas or in Afghanistan is palpable, Defence of friendship. Long may it last. training with their units to deploy in looks due for a big hit after the the next few months. We all have election, and the English press is I am delighted that my successor at one time lived together, worked already presuming the World Cup as Honorary President is to be together and sometimes fought is ‘coming home’. Yet despite all Lieutenant General Sir Freddie together while serving to defend this we have so much for which Vigges.
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing Organized Crime and Drug Trafficking in Iraq
    ADDRESSING ORGANIZED CRIME AND DRUG TRAFFICKING IN IRAQ REPORT OF THE UNODC FACT FINDING MISSION 5-18 AUGUST 2003 25 August 2003 Vienna ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This mission report was compiled in the immediate aftermath of the tragic bombing of the UN Headquarters in Baghdad on 19 August 2003, which claimed the lives of many UN staff including Sergio Vieira de Mello the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Iraq (SRSG). The mission completed its work in Baghdad on 18 August greatly encouraged by the commitment and dedication shown by Sergio de Mello and his staff to tackling the many problems facing the people of Iraq, including the pressing issue of improving security in the country. Sergio de Mello left a lasting impression on the team members and his vision will continue to inspire. The mission team also wish to acknowledge with deep appreciation the role of Nadia Younes, the SRSG’s Chief of Staff, who also perished in the attack, and who had provided critical support and advice in the complex political environment of Baghdad. Thanks are due to Mr. Ramiro Lopes da Silva, deputy SRSG and Humanitarian Coordinator as well as to Colonel Jeff Davie, the SRSG’s military advisor, who provided invaluable assistance and logistical support throughout the mission. The mission team wish to take the opportunity to thank the Iraqi officials who kindly gave of their time by providing information, assistance and advice which led to a greater understanding of the security situation in general and organized crime and drug trafficking in particular. Specific thanks are due to Ambassador L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crossed Quills the Magazine of the Artillery Clerks’ Association
    The Crossed Quills The Magazine of the Artillery Clerks’ Association Edition 20 December 2016 The Royal Artillery Association Forecast of Events 2017 17 February Royal Artillery Gold Cup Sandown Park TBC RAA NEC Meeting Larkhill 29 April (TBC) Gunner Sunday RHC* Royal Hospital Chelsea 19 - 22 May RA Assembly* Blackpool 20 May NEC Meeting Blackpool 24 June Armed Forces Day Local & National Events 1 July RA Service of Remembrance* NMA, Alrewas, Staffordshire 9 August RAA Grand Draw Larkhill 7 - 8 October RAA Folkestone Assembly* Folkestone 7 October RAA NEC Meeting Folkestone 9 November Field of Remembrance Westminster Abbey 12 November RA Ceremony of Remembrance Hyde Park Corner 3 December St Barbara’s Day Service and Lunch* Larkhill Events marked * will attract transport subsidy for branches travelling by mini bus or coach Foreword by Association President - Lt Gen Richard Nugee CBE It is with the home the full effect of that great war, and the relative greatest pleasure peace we have lived through in contrast. and honour to have been That peace was no more evident than for all of us who asked by General served in Germany in the Cold War and beyond, and Freddie and Joe it was with some sadness that we closed the British Falzon to become Kiel Yacht Club at the end of August, after 71 years of your Honorary great sailing amongst the Danish Islands, with all their President, and I attractions (particularly as a subaltern!), where the am delighted that Gunners played a very large part. I will have the chance to meet I thought I might give a brief view from my current role many of you, and affirm friendships long since made.
    [Show full text]
  • Society News, Etc
    HORTICULTURAL SHOWS & OTHER EVENTS URBAN FERNS AROUND MANCHESTER MUSEUM – 28 July Dave Bishop On the last Saturday in July, BPS Secretary Yvonne Golding gave a presentation on Urban Ferns to members of the public and three BPS members at Manchester Museum. Around 15 people attended. Yvonne first gave an introduction to the BPS from its formation in 1891 to the current day. Following on from this we saw an excellent video The Secret Life of Ferns, which explains the complicated fern life-cycle in a simple and understandable way. We then put this knowledge into practice when we were shown how to grow ferns from spores and we were able to examine a selection of living prothalli, which many people present had never seen before. After tea we saw a slide-show of ferns in urban environments, including some exotic species living in a London basement (courtesy of John Edgington), native species living in Oxford drains (Nick Hards), York downpipes (Alison and Liz Evans), Sheffield cemeteries, the back streets of Scarborough, Manchester walls and Edinburgh men’s toilets. After the show we went on a short walk around the Museum, finding ferns growing on walls, in drains and gutters, along downpipes and even on an old extractor fan. We soon found eight species: Asplenium ruta-muraria, A. scolopendrium, A. trichomanes, Athyrium filix-femina, Dryopteris dilatata, D. filix-mas, Polypodium vulgare and not forgetting Equisetum arvense. Yvonne and I then went to the pub as it was my birthday! Having seen John Edgington’s photo of forked spleenwort in London, I’ve been scouring the streets of Manchester in search of equally exciting ferns.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.1 Iraq's WMD Assessments, Pre-July 2002
    SECTION 4.1 IRAQ WMD ASSESSMENTS, PRE-JULY 2002 Contents Introduction and key findings ........................................................................................... 8 The UK’s assessment of Iraq’s WMD capabilities pre-9/11 ............................................. 9 The legacy of the 1990s ............................................................................................ 9 The UK’s assessment of Iraq’s WMD 2000 to 2001 ................................................ 12 JIC Assessment, 19 April 2000: ‘Iraq: Chemical and Biological Weapons Programmes’ ..................................................................................................... 12 JIC Assessment, 1 December 2000 .................................................................. 16 JIC Assessment, 9 February 2001: ‘Long Range Ballistic Missile Threat’ ........ 21 JIC Assessment, 10 May 2001 .......................................................................... 24 Wider concerns about proliferation and terrorist use of WMD ....................................... 30 Assessment of Iraq’s WMD capability after 9/11 ............................................................ 41 November to December 2001 .................................................................................. 41 The decision to produce a dossier covering Iraq, Iran, North Korea and Libya ...... 45 JIC Assessment, 27 February 2002: ‘Iraq: Saddam Under the Spotlight’ ................ 47 Public statements by Mr Blair and Mr Straw ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Information Regarding the Appointment of All Honorary Colonels in the British Army
    Army Secretariat Army Headquarters IDL 24 Blenheim Building Marlborough Lines Andover Hampshire, SP11 8HJ United Kingdom Ref: FOI2019/13423/13/04 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.army.mod.uk XXXXXX 09 January 2020 xxxxxxxxxxxxx Dear XXXXXX, Thank you for your letter of 06 December in which you requested the following information: “a. A current list as at 6 December 2019 of all the Honorary Colonels in the British Army b. An explanation as to how these appointments are advertised to ensure a wide diverse group as possible have an opportunity to be considered for these appointments c. An explanation as to how individuals are then selected for an appointment as an Honorary Colonel” I am treating your correspondence as a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 2000. A search for the information has now been completed within the Ministry of Defence, and I can confirm that the information in scope of your request is held and is below. In response to first part of your request please find attached a list of Honorary Colonels in the British Army. Some of this information is exempt from release under section 40 (Personal Data) of the FOIA. Section 40(2) has been applied to some of the information to protect personal information as governed by the Data Protection Act 2018. Section 40 is an absolute exemption and there is therefore no requirement to consider the public interest in deciding to withhold the information. In response to second part of your request please note that appointments are selected by nominations after basic criteria is met.
    [Show full text]
  • The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
    Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons dated 6 July 2016 for The Report of the Iraq Inquiry Report of a Committee of Privy Counsellors Volume V Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 6 July 2016 HC 265-V 46561_17b Viking_Volume V Title Page.indd 1 17/06/2016 12:48 © Crown copyright 2016 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identifi ed any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] Print ISBN 9781474110136 Web ISBN 9781474110143 ID 23051601 46561 07/16 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fi bre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Offi ce 46561_17b Viking_Volume V Title Page.indd 2 17/06/2016 12:48 Volume V CONTENTS 5 Advice on the legal basis for military action, November 2002 to March 2003 1 6.1 Development of the military options for an invasion of Iraq 171 6.2 Military planning for the invasion, January to March 2003 385 46561_17b Viking_Volume V Title Page.indd 3 17/06/2016 12:48 46561_17b Viking_Volume V Title Page.indd 4 17/06/2016 12:48 SECTION 5 ADVICE ON THE LEGAL BASIS FOR MILITARY ACTION, NOVEMBER 2002 TO MARCH 2003 Contents Introduction and key findings ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 0048-As1 Iban Report on the Audit of the Financial
    NATO UNCLASSIFIED 29 June 2015 DOCUMENT C-M(2015)0048-AS1 IBAN REPORT ON THE AUDIT OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ALLIED COMMAND OPERATIONS FOR 2013 ACTION SHEET On 26 June 2015, under the silence procedure, the Council noted the IBAN report IBA-AR(2014)20 attached to C-M(2015)0048 and agreed the recommendations contained in the RPPB report, including its public release. (Signed) Alexander Vershbow Deputy Secretary General NOTE: This Action Sheet is part of, and shall be attached to C-M(2015)0048. NATO UNCLASSIFIED NHQD9364 NATO UNCLASSIFIED 22 June 2015 DOCUMENT C-M(2015)0048 Silence Procedure ends: 26 Jun 2015 16:00 IBAN REPORT ON THE AUDIT OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ALLIED COMMAND OPERATIONS FOR 2013 Note by the Deputy Secretary General 1. I attach the International Board of Auditors for NATO (IBAN) report on the audit of the financial statements of Allied Command Operations (ACO) for the year ended 31 December 2013. 2. The IBAN issued a qualified opinion on the ACO financial statements for the year 2013 as well as a qualified opinion on compliance for the financial year 2013. The IBAN report, although showing improvements by ACO in many areas, also illustrates that many of the weaknesses identified in previous audit reports have not yet been fully corrected. While some progress has been made, particularly in clearing outstanding observations from previous years, the positive impact expected with the adoption of the NATO Accounting Framework has not yet materialised. 3. The IBAN report has been reviewed by the Resource Policy and Planning Board (RPPB), which has provided its own report with conclusions and recommendations to Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Formal Minutes
    House of Commons Defence Committee Formal Minutes Session 2013-14 Defence Committee: Formal Minutes 2013–14 The Defence Committee The Defence Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Ministry of Defence and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rory Stewart MP (Conservative, Penrith and The Border) (Chair) Mr Julian Brazier MP (Conservative, Canterbury) Rt Hon Jeffrey M. Donaldson MP (Democratic Unionist, Lagan Valley) Mr James Gray MP (Conservative, North Wiltshire) Mr Dai Havard MP (Labour, Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney) Mr Adam Holloway MP (Conservative, Gravesham) Mrs Madeleine Moon MP (Labour, Bridgend) Sir Bob Russell (Liberal Democrat, Colchester) Bob Stewart MP (Conservative, Beckenham) Ms Gisela Stuart MP (Labour, Birmingham, Edgbaston) Derek Twigg MP, (Labour, Halton) John Woodcock MP (Lab/Co-op, Barrow and Furness) The following were also Members of the Committee during the Parliament Rt Hon James Arbuthnot MP (Conservative, North East Hampshire) (former Chair) Thomas Docherty MP (Labour, Dunfermline and West Fife) Mr John Glen MP (Conservative, Salisbury). Mr Mike Hancock MP (Liberal Democrat, Portsmouth South) Mr David Hamilton MP (Labour, Midlothian) Penny Mordaunt MP (Conservative, Portsmouth North) Sandra Osborne MP (Labour, Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock) Alison Seabeck MP (Labour, Moor View) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]