DOCSLIB.ORG

Working Paper Series 2018/22/EFE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Working Paper Series 2018/22/EFE Working Paper Series 2018/22/EFE Trump: A Tragi-Comedy Manfred F. R. Kets de Vries INSEAD, [email protected] This article explores the concept of tragi-comedy in which both forms of artistic endeavor are combined. An example of the genre, the film “The Death of Stalin”, is reviewed, portraying the consequences of dictatorial leadership. However, it is not only in the Russian mindscape where tragi-comedy can turn into a cautionary tale about flawed leadership. Looking at the state of the world, “great men” are once more on the rise and disturbing socio-political developments are occurring even in the “land of the free”. Given President Trump’s determination to “Make America Great Again”, this article explores the question of how he is recasting leadership. What’s very disturbing in these dynamics is the obsequiousness of his inner circle. Drawing parallels with scenes from the firm in the aftermath of Stalin’s death, I explore how exposure to flattery prevents leaders from recognizing the hidden agendas behind such behavior. Flattery has an insidious way of moving into the collective unconscious, often with devastating results. Observations are made about the interface between flattery and groupthink, as well as how it gives rise to social defenses. Ultimately, the question becomes, will Trump’s presidency be a comedy or tragedy? Keywords: Dysfunctional Leadership; “Great Man”; Obsequiousness; Flattery; Social Defenses; Groupthink; Faulty Decision-Making Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=3193844 A Working Paper is the author’s intellectual property. It is intended as a means to promote research to interested readers. Its content should not be copied or hosted on any server without written permission from [email protected] Find more INSEAD papers at https://www.insead.edu/faculty-research/research Nothing in this world is harder than speaking the truth, nothing easier than flattery. —Fyodor Dostoevsky Flattery is all right if you don’t inhale. —Adlai Stevenson My IQ is one of the highest — and you all know it! Please don’t feel so stupid or insecure; it’s not your fault. —Donald Trump Tragedy or comedy A thin line separates joy and pain, hurt and humor, and for that matter, tragedy and comedy (Williams, 1966; Kerr, 1985; Walton, 2015; Day, 2016). Both depict human foibles but there are differences in the way in which they are dealt with, as well as in their outcomes. A simple distinction is to describe tragedy as a serious story with a sad ending, while comedy is a humorous story with a happy ending. Generally speaking, tragedy teaches important lessons of life by arousing a sense of pity or terror. In such instances, the dramatization of the “tragic flaw” of the protagonist leads to his or her downfall. In contrast, comedies take the perspective that life is ridiculous and absurd; faults and weaknesses are depicted as foolish. And like tragedy, comedy casts light on human shortcomings. Unlike tragedy, however, it makes fun of conceit and self-delusion, yet 1 allows for personal improvement and self-renewal in the end, whereas tragedy usually ends in the protagonist’s demise—physically or spiritually. Tragi-comedy is the arena where comedy and tragedy meet, where tragedy contains enough comic elements to lighten the serious mood with a happy ending, intertwining conflicting emotions (Foster, 2004). After all, to know happiness, we must know sadness; experiencing sadness creates a greater appreciation for happiness. As is so often the case in theatre, the glue that connects the two art forms turns out to be humor, which is a highly effective way to cope with devastating situations. This interconnectedness is masterfully portrayed in the film “The Death of Stalin”, a tragi- comedy directed by the Scottish satirist, Armando Iannucci (Nuru, 2017), which depicts the aftermath of the passing one of the greatest monsters of the 20th century: Joseph Stalin. Following his sudden demise, the capital Moscow is plunged into disarray. The state of chaos portrayed demonstrates what years of dictatorship have done to a society. Its tragi-comic nature led to the decision by Russia’s Ministry of Culture’s to ban the film, labeling it “offensive” and “extremist” (Telegraph, January 23, 2018). Most likely, it cut too close to the bone of the Putin era élite. To be reminded of a terrifying past is one thing, but to mock a serious and horrific event must have been—at least to the censors—one step too far. Stalin’s reign was not only terrifying, it was also terrifying in its ridiculousness. For example, the film shows how in the short episode before Stalin’s death his entourage behaved in an extremely obsequious, farcical way—a way of acting that may have been 2 unacceptable to senior government officials. The mocking of the Communist top brass held up a mirror that the censors refused to look into. It may have been too much of a reminder mof what’s happen ing in the present. The death of Stalin After Stalin’s death, the film shows how his cronies embark on a frantic power struggle. Among the prime contenders are the dimwitted Georgy Malenkov, the shrewd Nikita Khrushchev, and the sadistic chief of the Soviet security and secret police apparatus, Lavrentiy Beria. Combining Machiavellian-like intrigue with riotous farce, the film becomes a caricature of bureaucratic dysfunction. Given its similarity to present-day Russia—a resemblance that must have been obvious to Putin’s government officials—it offers insights on what can go wrong when a country is under dictatorial leadership. The depiction of what may happen when “great men” die is uncanny. Like other tragicomedies, it is not only a comment on the societal ills that are hard to express in a more direct way, but also an attempt to master the fear and anxiety that such leaders propagate. The rise of “great men” It is not only Russia to which this tragi-comedy offers a cautionary tale about flawed leadership. Looking at the state of the world, it is worrisome to see how many “great men” are once more on the rise. Even in the “land of the free” we are faced with disturbing developments. In seeking to “Make America Great Again”, Trump has taken a dangerous way to redefine what leadership is all about. Given his flawed leadership style, it begs the question what his presidency will do to America. The way he is running the country offers 3 many similarities with the imagery presented in the film “The death of Stalin”. Should we look at his presidency as a tragedy or comedy? Looking at Trump’s daily reality show, is he making us cry or laugh, or both? Trump’s presidential arc provides many insights about human fallibility. Will his antics lead to a dramatic reversal of fortune? Will he go from hero to zero? Will Trump—like most tragic heroes—finally (albeit too late) realize his errors? Will hubris and vindictiveness contribute to his downfall? But taking another angle, will Trump transform into a comic hero? Could he simply be holding up a mirror to society to reflect its follies and vices in the hope that they will be mended? Admittedlyj, people who have to deal with “great men” like Trum need to be obsequious in order to survive. To speak truth to power can only be done at their own risk. In that context, Trump has been compared to a Mafia boss, an observation made by former FBI Director James Comey (2018). In his book A higher loyalty, Comey observes the dynamics at play in Trump’s inner court: “The silent circle of assent. The boss in complete control. Loyalty oaths. The us-versus-them world view. The lying about all things, large and small, in service to some code of loyalty.” However, the Mafia boss analogy may not be entirely appropriate. Looking at the developments in Washington, the White House seems more like a medieval court, with its cliques and coerced displays of fealty, all taking place under the somewhat paranoid eye of Trump and his close family. Given what they are up against, his courtiers have 4 figured out that the only way to survive his peculiar “reign” is through flattery taken to the extreme. The dangers of obsequiousness Given Trump’s narcissistic needs, members of his Cabinet are expected to break out spontaneously in lavish praise of the “great man” at a moment’s notice (Kets de Vries & Miller, 1985; Millon, 1995; Kets de Vries, 2017). Due to his psychological insecurities, Trump’s main management objective seems to be to keep the people that work for him off balance, while at the same time expecting conspicuous acts of loyalty. No wonder, that members of Congress—even past critics—have figured out that dramatic shows of subservience are a precondition for getting anything done. People in Trump’s inner circle surpass each other in expressing their subservience at an unmatched, highly creative level. Some examples: the outgoing Speaker of the House Paul Ryan praised Trump’s “exquisite leadership.” Senator Orrin Hatch declared that “one of the great privileges of my life [is] to stand here on the White House lawn with the president of the United States who I love and appreciate so much.” Stephen Miller, a favorate Trump aide, “sees a man who [is] a political genius.” Nobody, however, has attained the heights of obsequiousness of Vice President Mike Pence, “thanking him for fulfilling miracles,” and crediting him with “restoring American credibility on the world stage, spurring record-setting optimism.” As a final accolade, Pence in his role as “flatterer-in-chief” added that “serving the president is the greatest privilege of my life.” 5 All leaders have blind spots.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Title of Thesis: ABSTRACT CLASSIFYING BIAS
    ABSTRACT Title of Thesis: CLASSIFYING BIAS IN LARGE MULTILINGUAL CORPORA VIA CROWDSOURCING AND TOPIC MODELING Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang Thesis Directed By: Dr. David Zajic, Ph.D. Our project extends previous algorithmic approaches to finding bias in large text corpora. We used multilingual topic modeling to examine language-specific bias in the English, Spanish, and Russian versions of Wikipedia. In particular, we placed Spanish articles discussing the Cold War on a Russian-English viewpoint spectrum based on similarity in topic distribution. We then crowdsourced human annotations of Spanish Wikipedia articles for comparison to the topic model. Our hypothesis was that human annotators and topic modeling algorithms would provide correlated results for bias. However, that was not the case. Our annotators indicated that humans were more perceptive of sentiment in article text than topic distribution, which suggests that our classifier provides a different perspective on a text’s bias. CLASSIFYING BIAS IN LARGE MULTILINGUAL CORPORA VIA CROWDSOURCING AND TOPIC MODELING by Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Gemstone Honors Program, University of Maryland, 2018 Advisory Committee: Dr. David Zajic, Chair Dr. Brian Butler Dr. Marine Carpuat Dr. Melanie Kill Dr. Philip Resnik Mr. Ed Summers © Copyright by Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang 2018 Acknowledgements We would like to express our sincerest gratitude to our mentor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Conspiracy of Peace: the Cold War, the International Peace Movement, and the Soviet Peace Campaign, 1946-1956
    The London School of Economics and Political Science Conspiracy of Peace: The Cold War, the International Peace Movement, and the Soviet Peace Campaign, 1946-1956 Vladimir Dobrenko A thesis submitted to the Department of International History of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, October 2015 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 90,957 words. Statement of conjoint work I can confirm that my thesis was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling and grammar by John Clifton of www.proofreading247.co.uk/ I have followed the Chicago Manual of Style, 16th edition, for referencing. 2 Abstract This thesis deals with the Soviet Union’s Peace Campaign during the first decade of the Cold War as it sought to establish the Iron Curtain. The thesis focuses on the primary institutions engaged in the Peace Campaign: the World Peace Council and the Soviet Peace Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Legacy for Contemporary Russian Foreign Policy
    CHAPTER 1 The Historical Legacy for Contemporary Russian Foreign Policy o other country in the world is a global power simply by virtue of geogra- N phy.1 The growth of Russia from an isolated, backward East Slavic principal- ity into a continental Eurasian empire meant that Russian foreign policy had to engage with many of the world’s principal centers of power. A Russian official trying to chart the country’s foreign policy in the 18th century, for instance, would have to be concerned simultaneously about the position and actions of the Manchu Empire in China, the Persian and Ottoman Empires (and their respec- tive vassals and subordinate allies), as well as all of the Great Powers in Europe, including Austria, Prussia, France, Britain, Holland, and Sweden. This geographic reality laid the basis for a Russian tradition of a “multivector” foreign policy, with leaders, at different points, emphasizing the importance of rela- tions with different parts of the world. For instance, during the 17th century, fully half of the departments of the Posolskii Prikaz—the Ambassadors’ Office—of the Muscovite state dealt with Russia’s neighbors to the south and east; in the next cen- tury, three out of the four departments of the College of International Affairs (the successor agency in the imperial government) covered different regions of Europe.2 Russian history thus bequeaths to the current government a variety of options in terms of how to frame the country’s international orientation. To some extent, the choices open to Russia today are rooted in the legacies of past decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Death of Stalin’ Almost a Soviet Spin on ‘Veep’
    CHICAGOLAWBULLETIN.COM FRIDAY, MARCH 30, 2018 ® Volume 164, No. 63 Serving Chicago’s legal community for 163 years ‘Death of Stalin’ almost a Soviet spin on ‘Veep’ inutes before a which was not as strongly word - Stalin, Beria was keeper and cre - live-broadcast ed as in the movie. ator of Stalin’s lists of those to be Mozart concerto is There was a late-night orches - tortured, exiled or sent to the gu - about to end, the tra round-up; Stalin did lay dying lags. He was a genius at mass ex - Radio Moscow sta - on the floor for hours because his ecution, ghastly humiliation and Mtion manager receives a telephone guards were too fearful to enter perverse sexual exploitation. call from the office of Supreme his room after hearing him fall; REBECCA Iannucci says he began Commander Josef Stal in. The and the Politburo members de - mulling a movie idea about a fic - premier loved the performance, liberated at length whether to L. F ORD tional contemporary dictator says the voice on the other end of call a doctor as Stalin expired, after ending his four-year run as the line, and requests that a fearing the consequences of call - the creator of the Emmy Award- recording of the concert be sent ing the “wrong” doctor. Rebecca L. Ford is counsel at Scharf winning HBO series “Veep.” to him immedi ately. Writer and director Armando Banks Marmor LLC, and concentrates While pondering this prospect, There’s a problem. The con - Iannucci didn’t ask the American her practice on complex litigation, he was given a copy of Fabien cert wasn’t recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • On Stalin's Team
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION When Stalin wanted to temporize in dealing with foreigners, he sometimes indicated that the problem would be getting it past his Polit- buro. This was taken as a fiction, since the diplomats assumed, correctly, that the final decision was his. But that doesn’t mean that there wasn’t a Polit buro that he consulted or a team of colleagues he worked with. That team—about a dozen persons at any given time, all men—came into ex- istence in the 1920s, fought the Opposition teams headed by Lev Trotsky and Grigory Zinoviev after Lenin’s death, and stayed together, remark- ably, for three decades, showing a phoenixlike capacity to survive team- threatening situations like the Great Purges, the paranoia of Stalin’s last years, and the perils of the post- Stalin transition. Thirty years is a long time to stay together in politics, even in a less lethal political climate than that of the Soviet Union under Stalin. The team finally disbanded in 1957, when one member (Nikita Khrushchev) made himself the new top boss and got rid of the rest of them. I’ve used the term “team” (in Russian, komanda) for the leadership group around Stalin. At least one other scholar has also used this term, but alternatives are available. You could call it a “gang” (shaika) if you wanted to claim that its activities—ruling the country—had an illegiti- mate quality that made them essentially criminal rather than govern- mental.
    [Show full text]
  • The Methods of Stalinism Condemned at the Soviet Communist Party Congress' from Il Nuovo Corriere Della Sera (18 February 1956)
    'The methods of Stalinism condemned at the Soviet Communist Party Congress' from Il nuovo Corriere della Sera (18 February 1956) Caption: On 18 February 1956, the Italian newspaper Il nuovo Corriere della Sera speculates on the genuine desire for de-Stalinisation shown by Nikita Khrushchev, the new Soviet leader, on the occasion of his submission of the report on Stalin’s crimes to the 20th Soviet Communist Party Congress in Moscow. Source: Il nuovo Corriere della Sera. 18.02.1956, n° 42; anno 81. Milano: Corriere della Sera. "Il congresso del P.C. sovietico condanna i metodi dello stalinismo", auteur:Ottone, Piero , p. 1. Copyright: (c) Translation CVCE.EU by UNI.LU All rights of reproduction, of public communication, of adaptation, of distribution or of dissemination via Internet, internal network or any other means are strictly reserved in all countries. Consult the legal notice and the terms and conditions of use regarding this site. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/the_methods_of_stalinism_condemned_at_the_soviet_com munist_party_congress_from_il_nuovo_corriere_della_sera_18_february_1956-en- d21f39be-519c-497f-9082-49193e08afc6.html Last updated: 05/07/2016 1/3 The methods of Stalinism condemned at the Soviet Communist Party Congress ‘The personality cult, widespread in the past,’ says Suslov, ‘has wrought serious damage’ — Malenkov confirms the principles of collective direction — In a speech, Togliatti endorses Khrushchev’s guidelines on tactics in the ‘capitalist’ countries From our correspondent Moscow 17 February, evening. The Soviet Party Congress has reached its fourth day; mile-long speeches, stuffed with learned citations from Marx and Lenin, have followed one another without respite. Speakers are commenting on Khrushchev’s report or, to be more precise, are praising and paraphrasing it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Golunov Affair
    the harriman institute at columbia university FALL 2019 The Golunov Affair Fighting Corruption in Russia Harriman Magazine is published biannually by Design and Art Direction: Columbia Creative Opposite page: the Harriman Institute. Alexander Cooley Harriman Institute (Photo by Jeffrey Managing Editor: Ronald Meyer Alexander Cooley, Director Schifman) Editor: Masha Udensiva-Brenner Alla Rachkov, Associate Director Ryan Kreider, Assistant Director Comments, suggestions, or address changes may Rebecca Dalton, Program Manager, Student Affairs be emailed to Masha Udensiva-Brenner at [email protected]. Harriman Institute Columbia University Cover image: Police officer walks past a “lone picket” 420 West 118th Street standing in front of the Main Office of the Moscow Police, New York, NY 10027 holding a sign that reads: “I am Golunov” (June 7, 2019). ITAR-TASS News Agency/Alamy Live News. Tel: 212-854-4623 Fax: 212-666-3481 Image on this page: Eduard Gorokhovsky, Untitled, 1988. Watercolor on paper, 21½ x 29½ in. Courtesy of the Kolodzei Collection of Russian and Eastern European Art, For the latest news and updates about the Harriman Kolodzei Art Foundation. www.KolodzeiArt.org Institute, visit harriman.columbia.edu. Stay connected through Facebook and Twitter! www.twitter.com/HarrimanInst www.facebook.com/TheHarrimanInstitute FROM THE DIRECTOR he June arrest of investigative journalist Ivan Golunov, the powerful civic T movement in his support, and his subsequent release marked the start of an eventful summer in Russia. In mid-July, Russians took to the streets again, over the disqualification of opposition candidates from the Moscow City Duma election. In this context, we dedicate the bulk of this issue to contemporary Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • GRASSROOTS DIPLOMACY: AMERICAN COLD WAR TRAVELERS and the MAKING of a POPULAR DÉTENTE, 1958-1972 by MICHAEL METSNER Submitted
    GRASSROOTS DIPLOMACY: AMERICAN COLD WAR TRAVELERS AND THE MAKING OF A POPULAR DÉTENTE, 1958-1972 by MICHAEL METSNER Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY May 2018 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the dissertation of Michael Metsner candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy*. Committee Chair Peter A. Shulman Committee Member Kenneth F. Ledford Committee Member David C. Hammack Committee Member Tatiana Zilotina Date of Defense February 26, 2018 *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. Table of Contents Acknowledgements ii Abstract iii Introduction 1 Chapter 1: “An adventure into the unknown” 27 Chapter 2: “Smiling faces” 89 Chapter 3: “An Underdeveloped Country” 142 Chapter 4: A New Sparta 201 Conclusion 261 Bibliography 275 i Acknowledgments First and foremost, I wish to thank the members of my dissertation committee for their support and feedback in the process of completing my dissertation. I owe a special debt of gratitude to Dr. Peter Shulman for helping me to refine my main argument and guiding me to the successful completion of this project. A special thanks to Dr. Kenneth Ledford for coining the evocative phrase “popular détente.” Many thanks to my fellow graduate students, past and present, in the History Department for their friendship and camaraderie. I have been fortunate to receive financial support for dissertation research from the History Associates at Case Western Reserve University, the Baker-Nord Center for the Humanities, and the CWRU Department of History.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of Communism
    The Rise and Fall of Communism archie brown To Susan and Alex, Douglas and Tamara and to my grandchildren Isobel and Martha, Nikolas and Alina Contents Maps vii A Note on Names viii Glossary and Abbreviations x Introduction 1 part one: Origins and Development 1. The Idea of Communism 9 2. Communism and Socialism – the Early Years 26 3. The Russian Revolutions and Civil War 40 4. ‘Building Socialism’: Russia and the Soviet Union, 1917–40 56 5. International Communism between the Two World Wars 78 6. What Do We Mean by a Communist System? 101 part two: Communism Ascendant 7. The Appeals of Communism 117 8. Communism and the Second World War 135 9. The Communist Takeovers in Europe – Indigenous Paths 148 10. The Communist Takeovers in Europe – Soviet Impositions 161 11. The Communists Take Power in China 179 12. Post-War Stalinism and the Break with Yugoslavia 194 part three: Surviving without Stalin 13. Khrushchev and the Twentieth Party Congress 227 14. Zig-zags on the Road to ‘communism’ 244 15. Revisionism and Revolution in Eastern Europe 267 16. Cuba: A Caribbean Communist State 293 17. China: From the ‘Hundred Flowers’ to ‘Cultural Revolution’ 313 18. Communism in Asia and Africa 332 19. The ‘Prague Spring’ 368 20. ‘The Era of Stagnation’: The Soviet Union under Brezhnev 398 part four: Pluralizing Pressures 21. The Challenge from Poland: John Paul II, Lech Wałesa, and the Rise of Solidarity 421 22. Reform in China: Deng Xiaoping and After 438 23. The Challenge of the West 459 part five: Interpreting the Fall of Communism 24.
    [Show full text]
  • Accusations Against Stalin Regarding the Great Purge and the Establishment of the Gulags
    International Court of Justice Accusations against Stalin regarding the Great Purge and the establishment of the Gulags Director: Alvaro Ricós Moderator: Carlos Colchero INTRODUCTION The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations (UN). It was founded in 1945 by the Charter of the United Nations and began work in 1946. The Court’s duty is to advise on legal questions referred to it by other UN organs or agencies (The Court ICG, n.d.). The Court is composed of 15 judges who are elected by the UN General Assembly and the Security Council. The Court is located in the Netherlands, and is therefore the only UN organ that is not located in New York. There are two types of cases involving the ICJ, either legal disputes called Contentious Cases, or advisory opinions on legal questions, which is the case in the upcoming trial. Other UN organs request trials to discuss and determine the legality of specific situations, so the most suitable states are chosen in order to provide the most informed verdict as possible. Furthermore, written and oral proceedings usually take place in order to inform the court of the case and then withdraw a public advisory decision. (The Court ICG, n.d.). First off, once the proceedings begin, the member States are required to file and exchange pleadings signaling their position and a detailed statement of laws or facts leading them to such position during what’s known as the written phase. After that, the State representatives are required to do oral proceedings addressing the court and thus looking forward to reaching a verdict.
    [Show full text]
  • Xi Jinping Consolidates His Power
    Erik Moberg ©: Xi Jinping consolidates his power In the book I give several examples of power shifts in party dictatorships. One possible pattern is that, after the disappearance of a former dictator, a group of competitors appear, and, after that, following a continued power struggle, one single person manages to become the one and only in power. That, for instance, was how Nikita Khrushchev became dictator after having ousted Georgy Malenkov and Nikolai Bulganin. Another similar pattern occurred in China after Mao Zedong, although it started already in Mao’s last years, that is in his lifetime. At that time the so called Gang of Four appeared and challenged Mao. The members were however imprisoned and severely sentenced by Mao’s successor Hua Gofeng. But Hua himself did not last long. After only two years, in 1978, he was forced out by Deng Xiaoping, who then remained in power until his death in 1997. A new dictator thus often feels compelled to consolidate his power and we are now witnessing an interesting process like that in China. Even if there was no open power struggle between several rivals when Xi Jinping became dictator in 2012 he was nevertheless vulnerable since he was not head of any established faction–factions are of great importance in Chinese politics. He has therefore undertaken quite a lot of consolidating measures, basically by substituting members of party sub-organizations or sub-groups at various levels and of different kinds. The basic principle has been to promote people loyal to himself and to suppress intra-party debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexei Kojevnikov Alexei Kojevnikov Since 1948, the Lysenko Case Has Become Generally Known As the Symbol of the Ideological
    GAMES OF SOVIET DEMOCRACY IDEOLOGICAL DISCUSSIONS IN SCIENCES AROUND 1948 RECONSIDERED. Alexei Kojevnikov* Alexei Kojevnikov Alexei Kojevnikov Since 1948, the Lysenko case has become generally known as the symbol of the ideological dic- tate in science and its damaging consequences. It is often explained that in the years following World War II, the Stalinist leadership launched an ideological and nationalistic campaign aimed at the creation of Marxist-Leninist and/or distinctively Russian, non-Western science. Concepts and theories which were found idealistic or bourgeois were banned and their supporters si- lenced. In no other science was this process completed to the same degree as in biology after the infamous Session of the Soviet Academy of Agricultural Sciences in August 1948, at which Lysenko declared the victory of his "Michurinist biology" over presumably idealistic "formal" genetics. The August Session, in turn, served as the model for a number of other ideological dis- cussions in various scholarly disciplines. This widely accepted interpretation encounters, however, two serious difficulties. The first ari- ses from a selective focus on one particular debate which fits stereotypes the best. It was critics of the Stalinist system who singled out the Lysenko case as the most important example of the application of Soviet ideology to science. The communist party viewed it differently. It did re- gard the event as a major achievement of the party ideological work and a great contribution to the progress of science (until 1964 when the mistake was quietly acknowledged). But what is more interesting and less expected, is that communists claimed five main ideological successes in science rather than one.
    [Show full text]