In the Supreme Court of Bangladesh Appellate Division Present: Criminal Appeal Nos.39-40 of 2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In the Supreme Court of Bangladesh Appellate Division Present: Criminal Appeal Nos.39-40 of 2013 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH APPELLATE DIVISION PRESENT: Mr. Justice Md. Muzammel Hossain, Chief Justice Mr. Justice Surendra Kumar Sinha Mr. Justice Md. Abdul Wahhab Miah Mr. Justice Hasan Foez Siddique Mr. Justice A.H.M. Shamsuddin Choudhury CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.39-40 OF 2013. (From the judgment and order dated 28th February, 2013 passed by the International Crimes Tribunal No.1, Dhaka in ICT-BD Case No.01 of 2011.) Allama Delwar Hossain Sayedee: Appellant. (In Crl. A. No.39 of 2013) The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Chief prosecutor, International Crimes Tribunal, Appellant. Dhaka, Bangladesh: (In Crl. A. No.40 of 2013) =Versus= The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Chief prosecutor, International Crimes Tribunal, Respondent. Dhaka, Bangladesh: (In Crl.A.No.39 of 2013) Delwar Hossain Sayeedi @ Delu: Respondent. (In Crl.A.No.40 of 2013) For the Appellant: Mr. S.M. Shahjahan, Advocate, instructed by (In Crl. A. No.39 of 2013) Mr. Zainul Abedin, Advocate-on-Record. For the Appellant: Mr. Mahbubey Alam, Attorney General, (In Crl. A. No.40 of 2013) instructed by Mr. Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record. For the Respondent: Mr. Mahbubey Alam, Attorney General, (In Crl. A. No.39 of 2013) instructed by Mr. Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record. For the Respondent: Mr. S.M. Shahjahan, Advocate, instructed by (In Crl. A. No.40 of 2013) Mr. Zainul Abedin, Advocate-on-Record. Date of hearing: 24th, 25th, 26th, 29th, 30th September, 2013, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 6th, 7th, 8th October, 2013, 14th, 18th, 19th, 20th, 24th, 25th November, 2013, 13th, 14th, 16th, 19th, 20th, 21st, 28th, 29th, 30th January, 2014, 2nd, 5th, 10th, 11th, 13th, 23rd, 24th, 25th, 26th, 27th February, 2014, 5th, 6th, 9th, 10th, 11th March, 2014, 1st, 10th, 13th, 15th and 16th April, 2014. Date of Judgment:17th September, 2014. 2 J U D G M E N T Md. Muzammel Hossain, CJ: I have gone through the judgments prepared by my learned brothers Surendra Kumar Sinha and Md. Abdul Wahhab Miah, JJ. I agree with the judgment prepared by my learned brother Surendra Kumar Sinha, J. CJ. Surendra Kumar Sinha,J: These appeals, one at the instance of the convict Allama Delwar Hossain Sayedee (Criminal Appeal No.39 of 2013), is against his conviction and sentence and the other, at the instance of the State (Criminal Appeal No.40 of 2013) is against non-awarding of sentence in respect of charge Nos.6, 7, 11, 14, 16 and 19 despite finding him guilty on those counts. Upon hearing the above appeals this Division allowed both the appeals in part by majority. The operating part of the short order is as follows: “The Criminal Appeal No.39 of 2013 is allowed in part by majority. The Criminal Appeal No.40 of 2013 is allowed in part by majority. Appellant-Allama Delwar Hossain Sayedee (in Crl. A. No.39 of 2013) is acquitted of charge 3 Nos.6, 11 and 14 and part of charge No.8 by majority. Appellant-Allama Delwar Hossain Sayedee is sentenced to 10(ten) years rigorous imprisonment by majority in respect of charge No.7. Appellant-Allama Delwar Hossain Sayedee’s sentence in respect of charge No.8 is altered to 12(twelve) years rigorous imprisonment by majority. Appellant-Allama Delwar Hossain Sayedee’s sentence in respect of charge No.10 is commuted to imprisonment for life i.e. rest of his natural life by majority. Appellant-Allama Delwar Hossain Sayedee is sentenced to imprisonment for life i.e. rest of his natural life in respect of charge Nos.16 and 19 by majority. The judgment in detail would follow.” The appellant was put on trial before the International Crimes Tribunal No.1, Dhaka, (the Tribunal) to face 20 count of charges, of them, the Tribunal found the appellant guilty of offences in respect of charge Nos.6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14, 16 and 19 and gave him the benefit of doubt in respect of charge Nos.1-5, 9, 12, 13, 4 15, 17, 18 and 20 and acquitted him of the said charges. Though it found the appellant guilty of eight counts of murder, abduction, torture, rape, persecution, forcible religious conversion, awarded him sentence in respect of charge Nos.8 and 10 only and refrained from passing any separate sentence in respect of charge Nos.6, 7, 11, 14, 16 and 19 on the reasoning that no fruitful purpose would be served to award him lesser sentence since death sentence has been awarded in two counts. In support of the charges, the prosecution has examined 28 witnesses and the defence has examined 17 witnesses. Both the parties have also relied upon documentary evidence in support of their respective case. The defence has admitted the perpetration of almost all the offences of Crimes against Humanity, which are punishable under section 3(2)(a) of the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act, 1973 (Act of 1973) by giving suggestions to the prosecution witnesses and also by examining witnesses at different places of Pirojpur, but it takes a plea of alibi of the appellant's complicity in those crimes. The substance of defence version is that though all those atrocities stated by the prosecution had 5 been perpetrated at Parerhat, Baduria, Chitholia, Nolbunia, Umedpur, Hoglabunia, Indur Kani villages under the then Pirojpur Sub-Division from 7th May, 1971, to June 1971, the appellant was not present at the crime site during the relevant time, and as he was staying at New Town, Jessore, and then he took shelter to villages Sheikhhati, Dhanghata, Mohiron under Bagharpara thana, Jessore district, he was not involved in the commission of those crimes. His claim is that after the commission of those crimes, he returned to Parerhat sometimes in mid July, 1971, and that those crimes were perpetrated by the Pakistani force in collaboration with the local Peace Committee members and Razakars. Since no appeal was preferred by the State against the order of acquittal in respect of count Nos.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 12, 13, 15, 17, 18 and 20, I shall confine my decision in respect of count Nos.6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14, 16 and 19. The pertinent question is whether the appellant was present during the relevant time at Parerhat or that he was staying elsewhere. If it is found that he was not present at or near the place of occurrence at the time of the commission of atrocities, it would rather be a futile 6 attempt to discuss the prosecution evidence in support of those charges, despite finding him guilty. To substantiate his claim of temporary absence from the crime site where the offences of Crimes against Humanity were perpetrated, the appellant has examined five witnesses, such as, Md. Abul Hossain (D.W.4), Roushan Ali (D.W.6), Md. Kobad Ali (D.W.8), Md. Hafizul Huq (D.W.12) and Md. Enam Hossain (D.W.14). Besides, he has also exhibited some documents showing that he was not involved in the perpetration of the crimes. The other witnesses examined on his behalf deposed that those incidents were perpetrated by the Pakistani army with the help of local auxiliary forces in different manner and not in the manner as stated by the prosecution. On the other hand, the prosecution witnesses stated that the appellant was physically present from the very beginning of the liberatioin struggle at Pirojpur, took active part in the formation of Razakars Bahini and Shanti Committee at Parerhat area, received the Pakistani army while they were entering into Pirojpur, as he was the one who had proficiency in Urdu speaking and that he had actively participated in all the atrocities committed at Parerhat, Pirojpur. 7 The Tribunal after sifting the evidence on record disbelieved the plea of alibi. It observed that the accused was a prominent member of Razakars Bahini of Parerhat area during the liberation struggle of Bangladesh and that he had actively participated in different atrocious activities by forming Razakars Bahibi as auxiliary force of Pakistani occupation force. It has considered exhibit 151, the nomination paper of the appellant Delwar Hossain Sayedee and the suggestions given to the prosecution witnesses Mahabubul Alam Howlader (P.W.1), Ruhul Amin Nabi (P.W.2), Sultan Ahmed Howlader (P.W.4), Mahatab Uddin Howlader (P.W.5), Manik Posari (P.W.6), Mustafa Howlader (P.W.8), Altaf Hossain Howlader (P.W.9), Basudev Mistri (P.W.10), A.K.M. Awal (P.W.12) and Gouranga Chandra Saha (P.W.13). The Tribunal held that exhibit 151, the nomination paper submitted by the appellant showed that he had four sons, of them, his eldest son Rafiq Bin Sayedee was alone born in 1970 but DWs 4 and 6 stted in cross-examination that Sayedee had two sons when he resided in Jessore town; that the defence suggested to P.Ws.1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12 and 13 that Sayedee was in Jessore since before the war of liberation 8 till mid July, 1971, but these witnesses denied the suggestions; that these witnesses and Sayedee hail from the same locality and these witnesses categorically stated that Sayedee was involved in the atrocities committed at Parerhat since May, 1971; that P.W.2, a commander of the freedom fighters categorically stated that he tried to arrest Delwar Hossain Sayedee in December, 1971 but failed to apprehend him as he fled away from the locality; that the evidence revealed that Delwar Hossain Sayedee went into hiding and took shelter to Jessore in the houses of Abul Hossain (D.W.4) and Rawshan Ali (D.W.6).
Recommended publications
  • ICT-BD Case No.04 of 2014, Order No.06
    International Crimes Tribunal-1 Old High Court Building, Dhaka, Bangladesh. ICT-BD Case No.04 OF 2014 Chief Prosecutor-Versus-Md. Obaidul Haque alias Taher and another Present: Mr. Justice M. Enayetur Rahim, Chairman Mr. Justice Jahangir Hossain, Member Mr. Justice Anwarul Haque, Member Order No.06 Order dated 02.03.2015 Mr. Moklesur Rahman, Advocate .......for the prosecution Mr. Shah Md. Shahab Uddin, Advocate .......for accused Md. Obaidul Haque alias Taher Mr. Mizanul Islam, Advocate with Mr. Gazi M. H. Tamim, Advocate .......for accused Ataur Rahman alias Noni Decision on charge framing matter Accused 1) Md. Obaidul Haque alias Taher and 2) Ataur Rahman alias Noni have been produced before this Tribunal today by the prison authority. Today is fixed for passing decision on charge framing matter and as such the record is taken up for order. Before giving decision on charge framing matter, we would prefer to provide a brief milieu and context of the case, its history, and the arguments presented by both prosecution and defence before this Tribunal. 1. Formation of the Tribunal This International Crimes Tribunal-1 [hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal] was established under the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act enacted in 1973 [hereinafter referred to as the Act] by 2 Bangladesh Parliament to provide for the detention, prosecution and punishment of persons responsible for genocide, crimes against Humanity, war crimes, and crimes committed in the territory of Bangladesh, in violation of customary international law, particularly between the period of 25 March and 16 December,1971. However, no Tribunal was set up and as such no one could be brought to justice under the Act until the government established the Tribunal on 25 March, 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Remittance Endeavour Progress
    Annual Report 2020 INVESTMENT ADVANCEMENT DEPOSITSDEPOSITS GDP GROWTH TRUST GDP SME REMITTANCE ENDEAVOUR PROGRESS Annual Report 2020 1 2 Annual Report 2020 Annual Report 2020 Annual Report 2020 3 Allah has permitted trading and forbidden (Riba) usury. Surah 2 Al-Bakara-275 6 Annual Report 2020 PAGE OF CONTENTS Qur’anic Verses on Interest 04 Hadith on Interest 05 Opinion of other Religions and Great Men on Interest 06 Board of Directors 07 Allah has permitted trading Executive Committee, Audit Committee, Shariah Supervisory Committee 08 Management Team 09 and forbidden (Riba) usury. Vision, Mission and Commitments 12 Corporate Information 13 Notice of the 26th Annual General Meeting 15 Surah 2 Al-Bakara-275 5 Year Financial Highlights 17 Economic Impact Report 18 Value Added Statements 19 Chairman’s Address 23 Managing Director’s Address 27 Directors’ Report 39 Compliance on the Corporate Governance Code 66 Report of the Shariah Supervisory Committee 83 Implementation Status of Code of Integrity under National Integrity Strategy 85 Report of the Board Audit Committee 87 Activities of the Board Risk Management Committee in the year 2020 89 CEO and CFO’s Declaration to the Board 90 Dividend Distribution Policy 2020 91 Disclosure of Unpaid or Unclaimed Dividend 92 Auditors’ Report & Financial Statements for the year 2020 93 Disclosures on Risk Based Capital (Basel-III) 169 Auditors’ Report on the Financial Statements of AIBL Capital Market Services Limited 2020 187 Auditors’ Report on the Financial Statements of AIBL Capital Management Limited 2020 209 Branches of AIBL 225 Proxy Form 233 Annual Report 2020 7 QUR’aNIC Verses on Interest I am seeking refuge in Allah from Shaitan, the outcast (the cursed one).
    [Show full text]
  • El Islam En Asia
    EDI TO RIAL EL ISLAM EN ASIA n nuestro afán por dar a conocer en mayor profundidad las realidades de una región en la que habitan el 80% de los musulmanes del mundo, hemos dedicado este número monográfico de la revista culturas a anali- zar, con la colaboración de grandes expertos en la materia, el islam en Asia. EA lo largo de este número de culturas, trataremos de ofrecer otra versión del is- lam, analizando la situación en diversos países, tales como Indonesia, Bangladesh, China o las antiguas repúblicas soviéticas de Asia Central, intentado mostrar el pluralismo que caracteriza al islam asiático. Por otro lado, tomaremos también algunos ejes transversales, como la cuestión de género, exponiendo las principa- les líneas de un debate tan intenso como desconocido. Asimismo, analizaremos el contexto de algunas minorías existentes en la zona y veremos cómo ha influido e influye ese islam asiático, que tan alejado vemos, en las sociedades de Europa y Estados Unidos. Ante todo hay que tener en cuenta que el islam en Asia es un islam plural y di- verso, que en muchas ocasiones guarda escasa relación con otras interpretaciones que nos pueden resultar quizás más familiares. En la mayoría de los casos, el islam ha convivido en Asia con otras culturas y religiones, produciéndose una interac- ción entre las mismas que pervive hasta la actualidad. De ahí que, por ejemplo, la situación de las mujeres musulmanas en Asia plantee un amplio espectro de posibilidades, significativamente más complejas que las de otras sociedades culturalmente más homogéneas. Pese a ser percibido, en ocasiones, como lejano y desconocido, el islam asiático está presente en Europa y en Estados Unidos: por ejemplo, el 25% de los musulmanes residentes en EEUU son de origen sudasiático, mientras que en el Reino Unido, el 50% de los musulmanes provienen de Pakistán o Bangladesh.
    [Show full text]
  • International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh) 2 LM (Journal) 2017 (1) International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh)
    624 International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh) 2 LM (Journal) 2017 (1) International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh) indicted as suspects in war crimes. Three leaders of Jamaat were the first tried; each were convicted of several charges of war crimes. The first person convicted was Abul Kalam Azad (Bachchu), tried in absentia as he had left the country; he was sentenced to death in January 2013. The ICT initially received some offers of [Old High Court Building (Dhaka) where the tribunal is taking place] international assistance. In 2009, the UN The International Crimes Tribunal offered its expertise, expressing an interest in (Bangladesh) (ICT of Bangladesh) is a helping Bangladesh avoid the problems other domestic war crimes tribunal in Bangladesh set countries faced in similar trials.[8][9] The EU has up in 2009 to investigate and prosecute passed three resolutions supporting the trials suspects for the genocide committed in 1971 by and Jean Lambert has said "she expected that the Pakistan Army and their local collaborators, the trial would conform to the highest standard Razakars, Al-Badr and Al-Shams during the possible."[10] Bangladesh Liberation War.[1] During the 2008 general election, the Awami League (AL) However, since the beginning of the trials pledged to establish the tribunals in response to several human rights organisations and long-standing calls for trying war criminals. international legal figures have raised [11] The first indictments were issued in 2010. objections to the court proceedings. Human However, the main perpetrators
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Brief Argues That the International Community – And
    Volume: 1 Date: June, 2015 ISSN: POLICY 2406 -5625 POLICY BRIEF SADF BRIEF INDEX Democracy Stalemate in Bangladesh TOPIC PAGE NO What role for the international community? Introduction 2 ABSTRACT: The ICT trials and the root causes of the political crisis 5 This Policy Brief argues that the international community – and in particular the European Union – must assist democratic The Economic disruption 7 forces in Bangladesh. The rise of extremist violence in Bangladesh has spared no one but was symbolized by the Persecution of minorities appalling murder of three prominent bloggers secular voices of and liberal voices 8 Bangladesh's civil society. The rights of women and minorities are also under severe threat. This Policy Brief focuses on the The BNP boycott of political deadlock between the “Awami League” (AL) and the elections and alliance “Bangladesh Nationalist Party” (BNP) and urges the BNP to with Jamaat 11 sever ties with the "Jamaat-e-Islami". In addition its goal is to highlight the negative impact of increasing religious extremism A tragedy amidst political and political violence on civil society, democracy, secularism violence: implications of and the economy. Furthermore this Policy Brief will provide Rana Plaza 13 information on the importance of the International Crimes 1 Tribunal (ICT) in bringing justice and peace to Bangladesh The growing influence and reinforces the necessity to bring an end to impunity in order and clout of Jamaat-e-Islami 15 to create a level playing field in which peace can become a reality The BNP’s path to orderly Opposition 17 1 Policy Advice 18 The International Crimes (Tribunals) Act, 1973 (ACT NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Bangladesh's Political Crisis
    Mapping Bangladesh’s Political Crisis Asia Report N°264 | 9 February 2015 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Anatomy of a Conflict ....................................................................................................... 3 A. A Bitter History .......................................................................................................... 3 B. Democracy Returns ................................................................................................... 5 C. The Caretaker Model Ends ........................................................................................ 5 D. The 2014 Election ...................................................................................................... 6 III. Political Dysfunction ........................................................................................................ 8 A. Parliamentary Incapacity ........................................................................................... 8 B. An Opposition in Disarray ......................................................................................... 9 1. BNP Politics .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Odhikar Annual Human Rights Report 2013
    1 Introduction | : Odhikar Annual Human Rights Report 2013 Cover designed by Odhikar with photos collected from various sources: Clockwise from left: 1. Collapsed ruins of the Rana Plaza building –photo taken by Odhikar, 24/04/2013 2. Bodies of workers recovered from Rana Plaza –photo taken by Odhikar, 24/04/2013 3. Mohammad Nur Islam and Muktar Dai, who were shot dead by BSF at Bojrak border in Horipur Police Station, Thakurgaon District – photo taken by Odhikar, 03/01/2013 4. Photo Collage: Rizvi Hassan, victim of enforced disappearance from Chittagong; Mohammad Fakhrul Islam, victim of enforced disappearance from Middle Badda, Dhaka; Abdullah Umar Al Shahadat, victim of enforced disappearance from Mirpur, Dhaka; Humayun Kabir and Mohammad Saiful Islam, victims of enforced disappearance from Laksam, Comilla; Mohammad Tayob Pramanik, Kamal Hossain Patowari and Ibrahim Khalil, victims of enforced disappearance from Boraigram, Natore. All photographs collected from their families by Odhikar during the course of fact finding missions. 5. A broken idol of the Hindu goddess Kali at Rajganj under Begumganj Upazila in Noakhali District – photo taken by Odhikar, 03/03/2013 6. Bodies of Hefazate Islam activists at Dhaka Medical College Hospital Morgue – Photo collected from the daily Jugantor, 07/05/2013 2 Introduction | : Odhikar Annual Human Rights Report 2013 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................8 Human Rights and the Struggle for
    [Show full text]
  • Inexistent Rule of Law in Bangladesh Vol
    article 2 special report special report article of the International Convenant on Civil and Political Rights Vol. 13, No. 2 & 3 June - September 2014 ISSN 1811 7023 Inexistent Rule of Law in Bangladesh Rule of Law Inexistent Vol. 13, No. 2 & 3 June - September 2014 - September 2 & 3 June 13, No. Vol. special report Inexistent Rule of Law in Bangladesh Who’s reading article 2 “In an age when the major media barely touch the surface of major social issues, article 2 provides in-depth analysis of human rights violations and people’s struggles around Asia. For me, article 2 is an essential part of keeping abreast of major developing movements.” George Katsiaficas, author of Asia’s Unknown Uprising * * * “...that is quite a report, very interesting especially section on the stories of the victims and injured. Again, great work, it was a big undertaking and glad you managed to compile this valuable report (Focus on Southeast Asia - Suppression of emerging protests in Cambodia, March 2014)” Naly Pilorge, director, Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO) * * * “We have received 1 (one) exemplars Article 2 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Vol. 12, No. 4-Vol. 13, No. 1. We are really grateful for receiving the article. It would become useful collection for our library” Dr. Paripurna, S.H., M. Hum., LL.M., dean of the faculty of law, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia Contents SPECIAL REPORT: INEXISTENT RULE OF LAW IN BANGLADESH Introduction: The Rule of Law does not exist in Bangladesh 3 Editorial board, article 2 Rule of Law in Bangladesh: Normative standards and reality’s mirror 9 Md.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019
    ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Annual Report 2019 Allah has permitted trading and forbidden (Riba) usury. Surah 2 Al-Bakara-275 Page of Contents Qur’anic Verses on Interest 04 Hadith on Interest 05 Opinion of other Religions and Great Men on Interest 06 Board of Directors 07 Executive Committee, Audit Committee, Shariah Supervisory Committee 08 Management Team 09 Vision, Mission and Commitments 12 Corporate Information 13 Notice of the 25th Annual General Meeting 15 5 Year Financial Highlights 17 Economic Impact Report 18 Value Added Statements 19 Chairman’s Address 23 Managing Director’s Address 27 Board of Directors’ Report 39 Report of the Shariah Supervisory 87 Implementation Status of Integrity under National Integrity Strategy 89 Report of the Board Audit Committee 91 Activities of the Board Risk Management Committee in the year 2019 93 Auditors’ Report & Financial Statements for the year 2019 95 Disclosures on Risk Based Capital (Basel-III) 165 Auditors’ Report on the Financial Statements of AIBL Capital Market Services Limited 180 Auditors’ Report on the Financial Statements of AIBL Capital Management Limited 201 Branches of AIBL 216 Proxy Form 223 Qur’anic Verses on Interest I am seeking refuge in Allah from Shaitan, the outcast (the cursed one). In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful. “Those who consume interest cannot stand (on the Day of Resurrection) except as one stands who is being beaten by Shaitan into insanity. That is because they say, ‘Trade is just like interest’ whereas Allah has permitted Trading and has forbidden (Riba) Usury. So whoever has received an admonition from his Lord and desists may have what is past, and his affair rests with Allah.
    [Show full text]
  • The Participation of Women in the Liberation War of Bangladesh in 1971: a Historical Analysis
    American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR) 2020 American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR) e-ISSN:2378-703X Volume-4, Issue-8, pp-215-224 www.ajhssr.com Research Paper Open Access The Participation of women in the Liberation War of Bangladesh in 1971: A Historical Analysis Md. Shahin Kadir Bhuiyan1, Tahmina Akter Dipu2 1(Assistant professor, Department of Bangladesh and Liberation War Studies / Noakhali Science and Technology University / Bangladesh) 2(Student / Department of Bangladesh and Liberation War Studies / Noakhali Science and Technology University / Bangladesh) ABSTRACT: “If blood is the price of independence,Bangladesh has paid the highest price in the history” ------- (London Times 1971) This paper quests to know the sacrifices of women in the liberation war of Bangladesh in 1971. Whenever we conceive the participation of women in the liberation war we only envision the women who were censured and raped. But women also participated in the war as fighters, helping hands, cookers, messengers, Diplomats, Inspiration, medical assistants and also as mothers. Most of the woman in Bangladesh participated in the war sometimes directly and sometimes indirectly. Some of our heroines also joined in the front war, among them two women had been awarded as “Bir Pratik”. We know our Liberation war was not an abrupt matter, so the participation of women in liberation war was also not an astonishing thing. If we see the mounting of liberation war, we can see women had participated all the movements as like- Language movement in 1952, The Education Movement in 1962, The six points movement in 1966, The Mass Upsurge in 1969, The Pakistani General Election in 1970, 7th March speech in 1971 at the Race Course Ground.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the SUPREME COURT of BANGLADESH APPELLATE DIVISION (Criminal) PRESENT: Surendra Kumar Sinha, CJ Mir Quasem Ali: Syed Mahmud Hossain, J ...Appellant
    364 Mir Quasem Ali =VS= The Chief Prosecutor (Surendra Kumar Sinha, CJ) 2 LM (AD) 2017 (1) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH APPELLATE DIVISION (Criminal) PRESENT: Surendra Kumar Sinha, CJ Mir Quasem Ali: Syed Mahmud Hossain, J ...Appellant. Hasan Foez Siddique, J Mirza Hussain Haider, J Mohammad Bazlur Rahman, J =VS= Date of hearing: 9th, 10th, 15th, 16th, 17th, 23rd th and 24 February, 2016. The Chief Prosecutor, International Crimes Date of Judgment: 8th March, 2016. Tribunal, Dhaka, Bangladesh: Result:Appeal is allowed in part (See para 218) ...Respondent. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.144 OF 2014. (From the judgment and order dated 02.11.2014 passed by the International Crimes Tribunal No.2 (ICT-2) ICT-BD Case No.03 of 2013) ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THESE CASE: For the Appellant: Mr. Khondaker Mahbub Hossain, Senior Advocate (with Mr. S.M. Shahjahan, Advocate), instructed by Mr. Zainul Abedin, Advocate-on-Record. For the Respondent: Mr. Mahbubey Alaam, Attorey General, Bangladesh, (with Mr. Murad Reza, Additional Attorney General, Mr. Momtaz Uddin Fakir, Additional Attorney General, Mr. Biswajit Debnath, Deputy Attorney General, Mr. Md. Ekramul Haque, Deputy Attorney General, Mr. Kh. Diliruzzaman, Deputy Attorney General, Mr. Masud Hasan Chowdhury, Deputy Attorney General, and Mr. Bashir Ahmed, Assistant Attorney General), instructed by Mrs. Mahmuda Parveen, Advocate-on-Record. STATUTES REFERRED: 01. Section 3 of the International Crimes Tribunal Act of 1973 (Paras-164, 202) 02. Section 3(2) of the International Crimes Tribunal Act of 1973 (Paras-192, 201) 03. Section 3(2)(a)(g)(h) of the International Crimes Tribunal Act of 1973 (Paras-67, 75, 83, 88, 92, 94, 101, 108, 194, 206, 207) 04.
    [Show full text]
  • CORI Country Report Bangladesh, March 2012
    Confirms CORI country of origin research and information CORI Country Report Bangladesh, March 2012 CORI Country Report; Bangladesh, March 2012 Preface Country of Origin Information (COI) is required within Refugee Status Determination (RSD) to provide objective evidence on conditions in refugee producing countries to support decision making. Quality information about human rights, legal provisions, politics, culture, society, religion and healthcare in countries of origin is essential in establishing whether or not a person’s fear of persecution is well founded. CORI Country Reports are designed to aid decision making within RSD. They are not intended to be general reports on human rights conditions. They serve a specific purpose, collating legally relevant information on conditions in countries of origin, pertinent to the assessment of claims for asylum. Categories of COI included within this report are based on the most common issues arising from asylum applications made by Bangladeshi nationals. This report covers events up to 31 March 2012. COI is a specific discipline distinct from academic, journalistic or policy writing, with its own conventions and protocols of professional standards as outlined in international guidance such as The Common EU Guidelines on Processing Country of Origin Information, 2008 and UNHCR, Country of Origin Information: Towards Enhanced International Cooperation, 2004. CORI provides information impartially and objectively, the inclusion of source material in this report does not equate to CORI agreeing with its content or reflect CORI’s position on conditions in a country. It is acknowledged that all sources have a bias, it is for decision makers to place a weight on sources, assessing relevance to each individual application.
    [Show full text]