Muslim Identity Politics in the UK, 1960-2010 Development, Challenges, and the Future As Illustrated by ‘The Fate’ of Freedom of Expression

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Muslim Identity Politics in the UK, 1960-2010 Development, Challenges, and the Future As Illustrated by ‘The Fate’ of Freedom of Expression Muslim identity politics in the UK, 1960-2010 Development, challenges, and the future as illustrated by ‘the fate’ of freedom of expression Khadijah Elshayyal Thesis submitted to the Department of History, Royal Holloway, University of London, for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 1 Declaration of Authorship I, Khadijah Elshayyal, hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: ______________________ Date: ____________________ 2 Abstract The past four decades have witnessed a tremendous amount of change and development in the area of British Muslim identity politics. From the establishment and growth of local and regional community groups, to international Islamic movements taking root in the UK and making an impact on the attitudes and aspirations Muslim communities. From the Rushdie affair and its legacy, through to the impact of international terrorism (9/11), and terrorism on home soil (7/7), all of these events have left their unmistakeable mark on Britain’s Muslim communities. While there has been much recent academic study on British Muslims, there has been a lack of in-depth focus given to critically charting the development of a formal identity politics through official representative organisations, in the context of the rationale for claims that have been put forward towards government, their evolution and refinement over time and the impact of factors such as multiculturalism, Islamophobia and securitisation. With this thesis, I aim to contribute towards filling this gap in the literature. I first examine how formal Muslim identity politics ‘scene’ developed into the current familiar form. I look at some of the theory that has been used both to explain and to justify it. This includes examining aspects of British culture, and that of immigrant Muslim communities, which have informed and complicated approaches to engagement and dialogue at one and the same time. It also involves looking at notions of equality as recognition, and the idea of misrecognition. I propose that ever since the Rushdie affair of 1989, political claims put forward by Muslim organisations have been driven by the existence of an ‘equality gap’, and a keen desire to close this gap has informed and motivated their identity politics. Freedom of expression is a theme of particular interest. In the form of the Rushdie affair, it was a major trigger for the coming together of disparate Muslim groups to collectively engage with the government. Since then it has consistently been a site of much sensitivity, contention and debate. Deploying examples relating to freedom of expression, I illustrate how Muslim identity politics has evolved over the years and how priorities as well as tactics for Muslim groups and successive governments with whom they have engaged have both shifted and changed. Comparing and contrasting Muslim identity politics with the experiences of Britain’s Jewish communities, I draw out salient points of commonality and difference in their respective communal organisations. By pointing out how similar Muslim claims towards government have been to those made by Jews in the past, I show not only how Muslim identity politics has consciously benefited from the prior experiences of British Jewry, but, importantly, that Muslim political claims are not as exceptional or unreasonable as critics might suggest. Finally, I take stock of how British Muslim identity politics has progressed over this period, assessing the extent to which the ‘equality gap’ has been closed. I argue that while it has been considerably narrow, the events of recent decades have led to a change in its focus. I present projections and recommendations on the future of Muslim identity politics in the UK. I argue that whereas in the past period, Muslim organisations were overwhelmingly preoccupied with lobbying of the state, the future of identity politics lies in harnessing the potential of civic partnerships based on shared interests between diverse communities. This approach, when supplemented with the traditional lobbying role played by representative groups, can more effectively address the ‘equality gap’. 3 Contents Abstract 3 Acknowledgements 6 Acronyms 8 Glossary of non-English terms 10 Chronology 12 1. Introduction 16 Setting the Scene: historical and theoretical contexts 21 1.1 Free Speech in British and Muslim traditions 23 1.2 Equality in the theoretical terrain 36 1.3 Identity Politics: definition, theory and practice 43 1.4 Methodology 47 1.5 Thesis outline 49 2. Identity preservation and the birth of modern ‘Muslim 59 consciousness’: 1960s – 1980s 2.1 Muslim identity and ‘Britishness’ 60 2.2 Muslims in the ‘pre-multicultural’ Britain 62 2.3 Identity politics, race relations policy and equality in the UK 65 2.4 Muslims and identity politics: from subsistence as a primary 72 concern to the longer view 2.5 The first phase of community organising in the 20th Century 74 Conclusion 90 3. The formalisation of Muslim identity politics: Responses to hate 93 speech, discrimination and the Equality Gap, 1980-2001 3.1 Muslims and race relations policy – the Equality Gap 95 3.2 The formalisation of unity – and competition for representation 105 3.3 New Labour and Muslim representation 108 3.4 Jewish community organising in the UK – a survey 110 3.5 Institutionalisation of Muslim Identity Politics in Britain – 114 unique challenges 4 3.6 The MCB and its genesis 119 Conclusion 125 4. Turning Point 1: The aftermath of the September 11th Attacks, 127 September 2001 – July 2005 4.1 British Islam at the turn of the millennium 128 4.2 Muslims, freedom of expression and civil liberties in a post-9/11 135 Britain 4.3 New community challenges and policy trends: some losses, some 142 gains 4.4 Proactive self-expression through politics, civil society 148 engagement and creativity Conclusion 151 5. Turning Point 2: Identity politics and the threat of terrorism at 152 home, 7th July 2005 – June 2010 5.1 Terrorism on home soil 154 5.2 Legal changes and the Terrorism Act 2006: the ‘hard’ approach 159 5.3 State-initiated community-centred responses: the ‘soft’ approach 168 5.4 The MCB, the ‘Israel Test’ and the rise of ‘apolitical’ Islam – the 184 media directly influencing political trends? 5.5 British Muslims – a changed identity politics in a changing 191 political landscape Conclusion 194 Postscript 199 6. Conclusions 210 Figure 1: Reproduction of Sadek Hamid’s ‘Applying Ramadan’s six major 223 Islamic tendencies to the British Muslim context’ Figure 2: Historical version of Sadek Hamid’s ‘Applying Ramadan’s six 224 major Islamic tendencies to the British Muslim context’, based on landscape of Muslim organisations/trends between 1960-1990s. Table 1: Glossary of Muslim representative and advocacy groups 225 Bibliography 231 5 Acknowledgements The period of my doctoral research has been one of great change both academically and personally, and I fear that I will never be able to adequately acknowledge the many people to whom I owe debts of gratitude and appreciation – but I shall try! Professor Cecile Laborde of the School of Public Policy at UCL was my first supervisor, and it was while studying for my MA, also under her supervision, that I became deeply interested in the issues and dilemmas of Muslims in multicultural Europe. Her advice, guidance and comments on the first two chapters especially, were invaluable. I benefited enormously from the regular Political Theory Seminars at the SPP, where some of my earliest ideas were tested out, challenged and revised. I also specifically thank Katerina Mantouvalou, a former colleague at UCL, for her comments and feedback on some of my initial drafts. Thereafter, it has been an immense honour to complete the thesis under the supervision of Professor Humayun Ansari. I cannot thank Professor Ansari enough for having the confidence in my work and accepting and facilitating my transfer from not only a different university, but also a different discipline. His advice, comments, insights, questions and support throughout have been immensely beneficial as well as motivational. I held formal interviews and informal conversations with a large number of individuals from British Muslim communities and organisations, as well as some from the Jewish communities. I was touched by the generosity – with both time and information, and occasionally hospitality – that I was shown by all my interviewees. Many have requested to remain anonymous, so I will respect their wishes by simply acknowledging them collectively, heartfelt thanks to you all! I consider myself extremely fortunate to have some truly superb friends who have always shown genuine interest in my work, and helped to keep me in touch with the ‘real world’ – Thank you to Faaria, Shaheen and Zarina, and thank you to my friends from my undergraduate days at King’s College London, particularly Sophia. Special thanks are reserved for Jasmine Gani who, as ever, has been an absolutely invaluable friend and colleague. But I can truly say that without the help and support of my family, I would not be submitting this thesis. They have all in different ways endured this journey with me through unstinting support – emotionally, financially, and otherwise. Their good humour and countless sacrifices have been humbling. Basma, Abdurrahman, Abdulkhaliq, Jamal, Amr, Mariam and Nada as well as Maryam, Serene, Noor and Hamza – thank you! Most of all, my parents, Dr Farid Elshayyal and Dr Fatma Amer are owed a huge debt of thanks. Being the daughter of two academics, the burden of expectation in education has always been high, and I know it is one I will never fulfil, but I hope this thesis will go some way towards making them proud! My mother especially has been a massive inspiration to me. Whenever I felt daunted by the road ahead, I remembered how she completed her own doctoral thesis with five children to care for.
Recommended publications
  • Council on Faith Newsletter Sep 20
    The Lord-Lieutenant's Council on Faith September Newsletter The mission of the Lieutenancy and its Council on Faith is to build bridges; connecting individuals, organisations and social networks. This will enhance Londoners’ sense of belonging and thus increase social inclusion within the capital. This newsletter records the activities of the Council on Faith members and the Lord-Lieutenant of Greater London, Sir Ken Olisa. Celebrating Local Faith and Community Work On Thursday 13th August, local community heroes were celebrated at Barking & Dagenham Faith Forum’s inaugural Faith & Community Awards. The local champions hailed from a range of different faiths, cultures and beliefs, and have used these to inspire positive change and progress in Barking and Dagenham. 19 projects and community groups were recognized across various categories. The event was hosted online and was enjoyed by 100 participants. Organisations and projects that were featured ranged from foodbanks to local mosques, gurdwaras and churches, to dance crews and arts and crafts groups. The local awards were made possible due to the support of the Council on Faith who is encouraging boroughs across London to hold their own awards event celebrating the successes of faith-based social action in their local area. It is hoped that this event, and similar schemes such as the Bexley Faith in Community Awards, will inspire others. Himanshu Jain, the Chair of Barking & Dagenham Faith Forum, said: “At such volatile and uncertain times, we believe it is more important than ever to shine a spotlight on, and celebrate, those who work to bring our community together. All of the groups and projects featured provide vital services that often do not receive the praise and recognition they deserve.
    [Show full text]
  • In-Focus Report on the Main Five Broadcasters
    Diversity and equal opportunities in television In-focus report on the main five broadcasters Publication Date: 27 September 2018 Contents Section 1. Introduction 1 2. How diverse is the BBC Public Television Service? 3 3. How diverse is Channel 4? 15 4. How diverse is ITV? 27 5. How diverse is Sky? 39 6. How diverse is Viacom? 51 7. Social Mobility – Recommendations from the Bridge Group 60 Annex A1. Guidance from the Bridge Group 62 Diversity and equal opportunities in television: In-focus report on the main five broadcasters 1. Introduction 1.1 This In-focus report provides more in-depth analysis across each of the main five broadcasters1 and should be read in conjunction with the main report. 1.2 Each section gives an overview of the six protected characteristics for which we collected data, showing profiles for all UK employees across each broadcaster. The top row (purple) shows profiles for gender, racial group and disability, for which data provision was mandatory. The bottom row (blue) shows profiles for age, sexual orientation and religion or belief, for which provision was voluntary. 1.3 Though broadcasters were not required to provide the information requested on a voluntary basis, we consider these to be equally important characteristics that should be monitored to effectively assess how well equal opportunities are being promoted across the industry. We made it clear in our information request that, to provide context and transparency, we would be publishing information on who did and didn’t provide the data requested. 1.4
    [Show full text]
  • Conveyor Belt’ Theory
    Counter-Productive Counter-Terrorism. How is the dysfunctional discourse of Prevent failing to restrain radicalisation? By: Lauren Powell1 Abstract This paper explores why the Prevent strand of the UK Government’s counter-terrorism strategy, CONTEST, is failing to achieve success in reducing radicalisation of young Muslims. By refusing to engage with extremists, and denying ‘extreme’ ideas a platform for expression, this paper will explain how the importance of cultural-linguistic epistemologies, and their role in extremism, has been overlooked. Rather than striving to understand how socio-political factors influence one’s reading of religious doctrines or interpretation of ideology, Prevent understands ideology to be the core radicalising agent, used by influential figures who can exploit the grievances of the vulnerable. The problematic repercussions of this will be addressed throughout, highlighting the various, and extensive, criticisms that Prevent has faced from academics, practitioners and commentators – primarily that it is counter-productive. The importance of the post-9/11 neoconservative paradigm in underpinning Prevent will be explained, but a Neo-Weberian approach, as a better lens through which to understand radicalisation, will be proposed, to ultimately trump the simplistic, yet currently dominant, ‘Conveyor Belt’ theory. Based on this, recommendations are made for an improved Prevent, rooted in the notion that radicalisation, extremism, or terrorism cannot be prevented, without knowing the motives, the views, and the assumptions of the radicals, the extremists, and those vulnerable to engaging with them. Keywords: Prevent; Deradicalisation; Extremism; Counter-Terrorism; Neo-Weberian Approach 1 2016 Graduate of Department of Politics, Languages and International Studies (PoLIS), University of Bath, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007-2008
    MARKING A DECADE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Annual Report 2007-2008 Contents Secretary General’s Address to the Annual General Meeting 4 Advocating Muslim Concerns 12 Committee Reports Business and Economics 13 Chaplaincy 14 Education 16 Europe and International Affairs 17 Food Standards 18 Health and Medical 19 Interfaith Relations 19 Legal Affairs 21 London Affairs 21 Media 22 Membership 23 Mosque and Community Affairs 24 Public Affairs 25 Research and Documentation 26 Social and Family Affairs 28 Youth and Sports 28 Project Reports Muslim Spiritual Care Provision in the NHS 28 Capacity Building of Mosques and Islamic Organisations (M100) 29 Books for Schools 30 Footsteps 31 Appendices (A) OBs, BoCs, Advisors, CWC and other Committees’ members 33 (B) Press Releases 37 (C) Consultations and Reports 38 (D) MCB affiliates 38 4 In the name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful Secretary General’s Address to the Annual General Meeting of the General Assembly Respected Chair, distinguished guests, brothers and sisters - Assalamu Alaikum wa Rahmatullah We are meeting in very challenging times for the Muslim communities in Britain, as well as across the rest of the world. In the UK, the media’s persistent focus on finding anything and everything problematic with Islam or Muslims has, to some extent, entered the subconscious of many parts of British society. Sober thinking parts of the academia and intelligentsia are now getting quite perturbed about it. This makes the on-going work of the MCB even more critical and relevant in today's climate and in the latter part of this address I will say a few words about this.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Government for BIA Members
    A guide to the Government for BIA members Correct as of 26 June 2020 This is a briefing for BIA members on the Government led by Boris Johnson and key ministerial appointments for our sector after the December 2019 General Election and February 2020 Cabinet reshuffle. Following the Conservative Party’s compelling victory, the Government now holds a majority of 80 seats in the House of Commons. The life sciences sector is high on the Government’s agenda and Boris Johnson has pledged to make the UK “the leading global hub for life sciences after Brexit”. With its strong majority, the Government has the power to enact the policies supportive of the sector in the Conservatives 2019 Manifesto. All in all, this indicates a positive outlook for life sciences during this Government’s tenure. Contents: Ministerial and policy maker positions in the new Government relevant to the life sciences sector .......................................................................................... 2 Ministers and policy maker profiles................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Ministerial and policy maker positions in the new Government relevant to the life sciences sector* *Please note that this guide only covers ministers and responsibilities relevant to the life sciences and will be updated as further roles and responsibilities are announced. Department Position Holder Relevant responsibility Holder in
    [Show full text]
  • Commission for Countering Extremism
    COMMISSION FOR COUNTERING EXTREMISM 1 CAGE is an independent advocacy organisation working to empower communities impacted by the War on Terror policies worldwide. The organisation highlights and campaigns against such policies in hope to achieve a world free from oppression and injustice. © Copyright 2019 CAGE Advocacy UK Ltd. All rights reserved.Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. CAGE Advocacy UK Ltd, Premier Business Centre, 47-49 Park Royal Road, London, NW10 7LQ +44 (0) 207 377 6700 [email protected] www.cage.ngo 2 3 Contents 4 Introduction 7 Precursors to the CCE 10 Counter Extremism, PREVENT and the approach of the CCE 13 The battle over ideology 15 Deinitions of Extremism 19 The ‘plague on both houses’: Counter-extremism, Muslims and the far-right 23 The hate crime agenda 25 The Islamophobia bias in the CCE 27 The CCE’s Expert Group 29. Fiyaz Mughal 32. Sir Mark Rowley 35. Emman El-Badawy 37. Sasha Havlicek 39. Jamie Bartlett 42. Dame Louise Casey 45. Sunder Katwala 47. Nick Lowles 49. Pragna Patel 51. Peter Tatchell 53. Professor Chetan Bhatt 54. Azeem Ibrahim 57. David Anderson 59. Hilary Pilkington 62. Katie Morris 63 Conclusions 3 INTRODUCTION In this report we will address some of policies to defeat extremism and promote the theoretical underpinnings of the pluralistic values’1. Commission for Countering Extremism (CCE)’s study on and approach to In January 2018 , Sara Khan, formerly CEO of ‘extremism’, as well as take a closer look at the counter-extremism organisation Inspire the biographies of the individuals making up was selected as the Lead Commissioner for the CCE Expert Group.
    [Show full text]
  • ICT-BD Case No.04 of 2014, Order No.06
    International Crimes Tribunal-1 Old High Court Building, Dhaka, Bangladesh. ICT-BD Case No.04 OF 2014 Chief Prosecutor-Versus-Md. Obaidul Haque alias Taher and another Present: Mr. Justice M. Enayetur Rahim, Chairman Mr. Justice Jahangir Hossain, Member Mr. Justice Anwarul Haque, Member Order No.06 Order dated 02.03.2015 Mr. Moklesur Rahman, Advocate .......for the prosecution Mr. Shah Md. Shahab Uddin, Advocate .......for accused Md. Obaidul Haque alias Taher Mr. Mizanul Islam, Advocate with Mr. Gazi M. H. Tamim, Advocate .......for accused Ataur Rahman alias Noni Decision on charge framing matter Accused 1) Md. Obaidul Haque alias Taher and 2) Ataur Rahman alias Noni have been produced before this Tribunal today by the prison authority. Today is fixed for passing decision on charge framing matter and as such the record is taken up for order. Before giving decision on charge framing matter, we would prefer to provide a brief milieu and context of the case, its history, and the arguments presented by both prosecution and defence before this Tribunal. 1. Formation of the Tribunal This International Crimes Tribunal-1 [hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal] was established under the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act enacted in 1973 [hereinafter referred to as the Act] by 2 Bangladesh Parliament to provide for the detention, prosecution and punishment of persons responsible for genocide, crimes against Humanity, war crimes, and crimes committed in the territory of Bangladesh, in violation of customary international law, particularly between the period of 25 March and 16 December,1971. However, no Tribunal was set up and as such no one could be brought to justice under the Act until the government established the Tribunal on 25 March, 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Art and the Crisis of the European Welfare State Addresses Contemporary Art in the Context of Changing European Welfare States
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO No Such Thing as Society: Art and the Crisis of the European Welfare State A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Art History, Theory and Criticism by Sarah Elsie Lookofsky Committee in charge: Professor Norman Bryson, Co-Chair Professor Lesley Stern, Co-Chair Professor Marcel Hénaff Professor Grant Kester Professor Barbara Kruger 2009 Copyright Sarah Elsie Lookofsky, 2009 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Sarah Elsie Lookofsky is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Co-Chair Co-Chair University of California, San Diego 2009 iii Dedication For my favorite boys: Daniel, David and Shannon iv Table of Contents Signature Page…….....................................................................................................iii Dedication.....................................................................................................................iv Table of Contents..........................................................................................................v Vita...............................................................................................................................vii Abstract……………………………………………………………………………..viii Chapter 1: “And, You Know, There Is No Such Thing as Society.” ....................... 1 1.1 People vs. Population ............................................................................... 2 1.2 Institutional
    [Show full text]
  • Al-Andalus' Lessons for Contemporary European
    IMMIGRATION, JUSTICE AND SOCIETY AL-ANDALUS’ LESSONS FOR CONTEMPORARY EUROPEAN MODELS OF INTEGRATION MYRIAM FRANÇOIS • BETHSABÉE SOURIS www.europeanreform.org @europeanreform Established by Margaret Thatcher, New Direction is Europe’s leading free market political foundation & publisher with offices in Brussels, London, Rome & Warsaw. New Direction is registered in Belgium as a not-for-profit organisation and is partly funded by the European Parliament. REGISTERED OFFICE: Rue du Trône, 4, 1000 Brussels, Belgium. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Naweed Khan. www.europeanreform.org @europeanreform The European Parliament and New Direction assume no responsibility for the opinions expressed in this publication. Sole liability rests with the author. AUTHORS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 6 2 AL-ANDALUS’ MODEL OF INTEGRATION 8 2.1 THE IBERIAN HISTORY FROM THE MUSLIM CONQUEST TO THE RECONQUISTA 10 2.1.1 Visigoth Spain 11 2.1.2 The Muslim advance in Arabia and Northern Africa 11 2.1.3 The conquest of Spain 12 2.1.4 The unstable first years of the Umayyad dynasty 14 2.1.5 The golden ages of the Caliphate of Cordoba 14 2.1.6 The fall of the Caliphate of Cordoba 16 2.1.7 The end of Al-Andalus and the Reconquista 16 2.2 2.2 THE SOCIAL MODEL OF INTEGRATION OF AL-ANDALUS 18 2.2.1 The social and religious landscape 19 2.2.2 Controversy over the meaning of ‘convivencia’ 19 2.2.3 Protection of religious’ communities boundaries 21 2.2.4 Towards an increased integration and acculturation: The Arabization of the non-Muslim communities 22 2.2.5 The cultural impact of the convivencia 25 Myriam François Bethsabée Souris 2.2.6 Limits of coexistence 26 Dr Myiam Francois is a journalist and academic with a Bethsabée Souris is a PhD candidate in Political Science at 3 TODAY’S EUROPEAN MODELS OF MUSLIM INTEGRATION 28 focus on France and the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • Hizb Ut-Tahrir Ideology and Strategy
    HIZB UT-TAHRIR IDEOLOGY AND STRATEGY “The fierce struggle… between the Muslims and the Kuffar, has been intense ever since the dawn of Islam... It will continue in this way – a bloody struggle alongside the intellectual struggle – until the Hour comes and Allah inherits the Earth...” Hizb ut-Tahrir The Centre for Social Cohesion Houriya Ahmed & Hannah Stuart HIZB UT-TAHRIR IDEOLOGY AND STRATEGY “The fierce struggle… between the Muslims and the Kuffar, has been intense ever since the dawn of Islam... It will continue in this way – a bloody struggle alongside the intellectual struggle – until the Hour comes and Allah inherits the Earth...” Hizb ut-Tahrir The Centre for Social Cohesion Houriya Ahmed & Hannah Stuart Hizb ut-Tahrir Ideology and Strategy Houriya Ahmed and Hannah Stuart 2009 The Centre for Social Cohesion Clutha House, 10 Storey’s Gate London SW1P 3AY Tel: +44 (0)20 7222 8909 Fax: +44 (0)5 601527476 Email: [email protected] www.socialcohesion.co.uk The Centre for Social Cohesion Limited by guarantee Registered in England and Wales: No. 06609071 © The Centre for Social Cohesion, November 2009 All the Institute’s publications seek to further its objective of promoting human rights for the benefit of the public. The views expressed are those of the author, not of the Institute. Hizb ut-Tahrir: Ideology and Strategy By Houriya Ahmed and Hannah Stuart ISBN 978-0-9560013-4-4 All rights reserved The map on the front cover depicts Hizb ut-Tahrir’s vision for its Caliphate in ‘Islamic Lands’ ABOUT THE AUTHORS Houriya Ahmed is a Research Fellow at the Centre for Social Cohesion (CSC).
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Radicalization in the Uk: Index of Radicalization
    ISLAMIC RADICALIZATION IN THE UK: INDEX OF RADICALIZATION Anna Wojtowicz, (Research Assistant, ICT) Sumer 2012 ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to analyze the process of radicalization amongst British Muslims in the United Kingdom. It begins with a review of the Muslim population, demographics and community structure. Further presenting several internal and external indicators that influenced and led to radicalization of Muslim youth in Britain. The paper concludes that there is no one certainty for what causes radicalization amongst Muslims in United Kingdom. However, it is certain that Islamic radicalization and the emergence of a homegrown threat is a growing trend that jeopardizes the countries security, peace and stability. Radicalization in the United Kingdom is an existing concern that needs to be addressed and acted upon immediately. Misunderstanding or underestimating the threat may lead to further and long term consequences. * The views expressed in this publication are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism (ICT). 2 I. Introduction 4 II. Background 5 History of the Muslim Community in the United Kingdom 5 Population 7 Geographical Concentration of Muslims 8 Ethnic Background 10 Age Estimate 11 Occupation and Socio-Economic Conditions 11 Religious and Cultural Aspects 13 Multiculturalism 17 Islamophobia 20 Converts 21 Case Studies –London, Birmingham, Bradford, Leeds, Leicester 22 III. Organizations 28 Organizations within the United Kingdom 28 Mosques, Koranic Schools and Islamic Centers 34 Student Groups 40 Islamic Websites and TV 43 IV. Radicalization in Britain 43 Theoretical Background and Causes of Radicalization 43 Recruitment and Radicalization: Overlook 47 Radicalization Process 49 Forms of Financing 51 Radical Groups and Movements in the UK 53 Influential Leaders in the UK 60 Inspiration and Influence from Abroad 67 Sunni 67 Shia 70 3 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Max Hill, QC, Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation for the United Kingdom by Sam Mullins1
    PERSPECTIVES ON TERRORISM Volume 12, Issue 2 Policy Brief Interview with Max Hill, QC, Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation for the United Kingdom by Sam Mullins1 Abstract The following text is a transcript of an interview between the author and the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation (IRTL) for the United Kingdom, Max Hill, QC, which took place on March 9, 2018 in Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany. Topics discussed included the role of the IRTL, prosecution of terrorism in the UK, returning foreign fighters, terrorism prevention and investigation measures (TPIMs), deportation of terrorism suspects, the involvement of children in terrorism, hate-preachers, and the British government’s efforts to counter non-violent extremism. The transcript has been edited for brevity. Keywords: terrorism, counter-terrorism, prosecution, security, human rights, civil liberties, United Kingdom. Introduction Security versus civil liberties. How to safeguard the population from the actions of terrorists, while at the same time preserving fundamental rights such as freedom of speech, movement and association? This is the age-old debate that lies at the heart of counter-terrorism (CT) in liberal democracies. The precise balance varies from country to country and across time but in the aftermath of attacks it is particularly likely to tip in favour of security, sometimes at the expense of certain liberties. The UK is no stranger to terrorism, but - similar to many other countries around the world - it has been on a heightened state of alert since 2014 when ISIS declared its caliphate, and last year the UK was rocked by a string of successful attacks, resulting in 36 fatalities [1].
    [Show full text]