DOCSLIB.ORG

Repeal the NCMF

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Repeal the NCMF Did you know that the NCMF(national commission on muslim filipinos), was created to serve, benefit and propagate only the Muslim-Filipinos or the followers of the religion of Islam? It’s mission: To be competent and committed government agency serving progressive and peaceful Muslim Filipino communities. It’ vision: To promote and develop the institutions and well-being of Muslim Filipinos towards national unity. The Philippine government finances this commission from a public fund meant only for the general public and never for any private citizens, organizations or enterprises. PD1445 specifically mandates that public funds must not be spent for private purposes. The Muslim-Filipinos are private citizens belonging to a private organization, Islam. Just as the Filipino Christians are private citizens belonging to the Christian churches or religions. The non-muslims do not get any Public funding from the Philippine government. There isn’t a single Filipino law created to fund the followers of any Non-Islamic religions. The NCMF serves only filipino-muslims, the followers of the religion of Islam. This is a misuse and misappropriation of public funds. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Article 1, SEC. 4 of RA 9997 (NCMF) states that it's Mandate be - "The Commission shall preserve and develop the culture, tradition, institutions, and well-being of Muslim Filipinos, in conformity with the country's laws and in consonance with national unity and development." By officially accepted and recognized definition Muslims are the followers of the religion of Islam. This commission was specifically created to help the followers of the religion of Islam only in the Philippines. The law is biased and favorable towards Muslim-Filipinos and prejudiced against Non-Muslim Filipinos. Being a Muslim (Moro) does not make an individual an indigenous person. Being a Muslim (Moro) makes the individual the follower of the religion of Islam. The Badjao, Bagobo, Banwaon, Bukidnon, Dibabawon, Higaonon, Ilanun/Iranun, Jama Mapun, Kalagan, Kalibugan, Maguindanao, Mamanua, Palawanon, Mandaya, Manguangan, Manobo, Mansaka, Maranaw, Molbog, Palawanon, Palibugan, Sama, Sangil, Subanen(Subanon), Tagakaolo, Talaandig, Tausūg, T'Boli, Tiruray, and Yakan people of the Philippines are some of the indigenous people but not the Muslims or Moros. ◦ These tribal people are some of the indigenous peoples of the Philippines. Their tribes existed in the Philippines long before Islam and Christianity arrived in the Philippines. The Muslims only showed up in the year 1380. Many of these tribal people are non- muslims and are following different religions. There are several races in the Philippines practicing the religion of Islam and they are Muslim. But not all of them are indigenous. Page 1 “Public Fund” is being used for a private group of people, the Muslim-Filipinos: Muslim Filipinos is not a race of people, they are not indigenous people. Article II POWERS AND FUNCTIONS (NCMF), Section 8(c) states: “Act as the primary government agency through which Muslim Filipinos can seek government assistance and redress; serve as the medium through which such assistance may be extended to Muslim Filipinos; for this purpose, the Commission is hereby authorized, subject to existing auditing rules and regulations, to give grants-in-aid out of its appropriations or other appropriate funds to cooperating government agencies for such programs or projects for the development of Muslim Filipino communities; provide services including legal assistance, medical aid, relief, rehabilitation and other forms of assistance for socioeconomic upliftment of Muslim Filipino comm unities; “ Giving grants to a Muslim person or funding for projects for only Muslim Filipino communities discriminates the Non-Muslims and therefore is a misappropriation of PUBLIC FUND as stated in PD1445. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Article II POWERS AND FUNCTIONS (NCMF), 8(r) states: “Promote the development of a Hajj Assistance Fund that shall be created from contributions of Muslim Filipinos and other donors which shall be used to support the financial needs of deserving Muslim Filipinos intending to participate in the annual Hajj;” Assisting in the Hajj with “PUBLIC FUND” violates PD 1445. The hajj is a strictly private quest of a Muslim person. It is strictly private and not for the benefit of the PUBLIC. The hajj is never meant for Non-Muslims. So this is again a misuse of Public Fund for the benefit of Muslims only, a private group of people who are the followers of the religion of Islam. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Article II POWERS AND FUNCTIONS (NCMF), Section 8 (u) states: Formulate and adopt continuing programs and activities to strengthen Madaris (plural of Madrasah) schools; Islamic Studies, and Shari'ah and Islamlc jurisprudence, in coordination with appropriate agencies of the government; Madrasas are not designed or meant for Non-Muslims. They are specifically for Muslims. Shari'ah is not for Non-Muslims. It is specifically for Muslims only. Muslims are the followers of the religion of Islam and are a private group of people. This type of assistance discriminates against the Non-Muslims and violates PD1445 and is therefore a misappropriation of PUBLIC FUNDS. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2 There were no Muslims(Moros) in the Philippines prior to the year 1380. And most definitely they were NOT the original inhabitants of Mindanao, Sulu, and Palawan. Moros are Muslims and they are not an ethnicity or indigenous people. Prior to the arrival of the Muslims, the Datus and the Rajas in each of their own tribal domains or kingdoms ruled. The Tausugs, the Maranaos, the Maguindanaoans , and all the other tribes had their own ancestral domains. None of them were Muslims or Moros. Never forget that the Moros(Muslims) were the first COLONIZERS of the Philippines. They were the first EXPLOITERS of the Filipino people. The Sultanates exploited the natural resources and the culture of the indigenous peoples. Now they even call the traditional clothing, dances, food, customs, and tools of the tribal indigenous peoples as Moro. They are the true Thieves of culture and natural resources. The Philippines continues to violate its constitution by not upholding the Separation of Church and State. Not a single senator or congressman will stand up against the government's financing of the religion of Islam. Even the Catholic church accepts this. The Jesuit priests even stepped forward and endorsed the Bangsamoro. The Philippines became a country of submissive people. Submissive to the religion of Islam.. The Philippines is the only country in the world (85% Catholic), that created three(3) laws"favoring", "respecting" and "financing" the religion of Islam. Then made it unlawful to finance any other religion. The only country in the world that has a government commission that caters to Muslims only, for the hajj, for madrasas, and the spread of Islam at government's expense, paid by the taxes of non-muslims. Even though the Philippines is over 85% Catholic, it FAVORS,"RESPECTS" and FINANCES only the religion of Islam, not Catholicism and not any other religions in the Philippines. For some twisted reasoning, the Philippine government seems to think that to become a Muslim(Moro) is to become an indigenous person. It also erroneously considers Moros or Muslims as a race. It incorrectly considers all the people of Mindanao as Moro people. It does not fully accept the fact that MOROS are MUSLIMS and that MOROS are the followers of the religion of Islam. This is not the fault of Islam. It is the fault of the Filipino leaders and of the Non-Muslim Filipinos. Legislature, more than likely, has been bought and paid for by the Muslim leaders and this is complicated by the aitude of indifference of non-muslim Filipinos. Currently the Muslims have a propaganda saying that"All residences of Mindanao are Moros. Even Christians are Moros if they are from Mindanao". Lies, Lies, Lies. Moros are Muslims. Christians are not Moros. Moros are the followers of the religion of Islam. We have our freedom of religion and of worship. However, the Philippine government must treat all religions equally, one religion must never be placed above others. The government must not financially support any religion whatsoever with a yearly governmental budget. God is superior to government, Government (Country) is superior to religion. Religion must never have sovereignty or autonomy over regions, provinces, cities, municipalities or barangays in the Philippines. Yet, the Philippines continue to financially support only the followers of the religion of Islam and is giving the Muslims an Islamic HOMELAND in Mindanao where Sharia rules supreme. Still ungrateful, only the religion of Islam continues to wage WAR against the Philippines. Only the religion of Islam has militias like the MNLF, MILF, and BIFF. Everybody knows that Islam does not believe, accept or tolerate the separation of religion from government or the "separation of church and state". The (Article II, Section 6) of the Philippine Constitution declares:"The separation of Church and State shall be inviolable". The preamble of the constitution calls for EQUALITY and: Article 6, section 29 (2): states"No public money or property shall be appropriated, applied, paid, or employed, directly or indirectly, for the use, benefit, or support of any sect, church, denomination, sectarian institution, or system of religion..,"; then legislature turns around and created three(3) laws"FAVORING","RESPECTING" and "FINANCING" the religion of Islam. Where is the EQUALITY in this? Page 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Toward Peace in the Southern Philippines
    UNITED STATES InsTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org SPECIAL REPORT 1200 17th Street NW • Washington, DC 20036 • 202.457.1700 • fax 202.429.6063 ABOUT THE REPORT G. Eugene Martin and Astrid S. Tuminez In 2003 the U.S. Department of State asked the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) to undertake a project to help expedite a peace agreement between the government of the Republic of the Philippines (GRP) and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF). The MILF has been engaged in a rebellion against the GRP for more than three decades, Toward Peace in the with the conflict concentrated on the southern island of Mindanao and the Sulu Archipelago. This report highlights USIP activities in the Philippines from 2003 to 2007. It Southern Philippines describes the conflict and its background, the substance of ongoing negotiations, USIP efforts to “facilitate” the peace process, and insights on potentially constructive steps for A Summary and Assessment of the USIP moving the Philippine peace talks forward. It concludes with a few lessons learned from USIP’s engagement in this Philippine Facilitation Project, 2003–2007 specific conflict, as well as general observations about the potential value of a quasi-governmental entity such as USIP in facilitating negotiations in other conflicts. G. Eugene Martin was the executive director of the Philippine Facilitation Project. He is a retired Foreign Summary Service officer who served as deputy chief of mission at the • The Muslim inhabitants of Mindanao and Sulu in the southern Philippines, known U.S. Embassy in Manila. Astrid S. Tuminez served as the project’s senior research associate.
    [Show full text]
  • The State-Moro Conflict in the Philippines
    The State-Moro Conflict in the Philippines Lisa Huang, Victor Musembi and Ljiljana Petronic June 21, 2012 INAF 5439 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The struggle for self-determination by the Moro people in the Southern Philippines began in 1565 under Spanish colonial rule and is still an unresolved conflict today. Rooted in primordial notions of homeland, indoctrination, social marginalization, and historical displacement, the Moro people and the government have engaged in multiple rounds of negotiations and produced several agreements. Currently, the Moro conflict is one of two large, deeply-rooted, and long lasting insurgencies featuring repeated peace processes in the Philippines; the other being the stop-start process of peace negotiations with the communist insurgents. The Moro people are composed of Sunni Muslims with varying linguistic groups which lack unity. The fragmented rebel groups, including the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) group and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), have weak legitimacy and bargaining power because of varying interests. The Muslim community perceives that there is a lack of government commitment to provide public goods in tandem to the latter‘s claim of authority over their territory. Furthermore, even though the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) is richly endowed with natural and human resources, poverty and development remain as large concerns. The Moro people view territory as a means to securing an identity, while Manila‘s view of territory is directly linked to its physical survival. In addition to territorial claims, the Moro people have experienced social, political and economic discrimination, creating grievances, which, however, are not considered ‗atypically severe‘1 but rather limited to ‗neglect and remedial policies‘2.
    [Show full text]
  • Lumads-Our-People-Too.Pdf
    The Lumads Are Our People, Too! • By Rudy B. Rodil ♥ Introduction The Lumad are the indigenous peoples of Mindanao. They constitute approximately five percent, clearly the minority, of the total Mindanao population in the 1990 census. The rest of the inhabitants in the region are Muslims, also indigenous, estimated at 20 percent; settlers and their descendants roughly make up the balance of 75 percent. It should be pointed out that a good portion of or assimilated into the latter segment are descendants of native inhabitants who were converted to Christianity in the Spanish period, mostly from northern and eastern Mindanao. How they became minorities is the story of this paper. Not only have they been reduced to a numerical minority in their own lands, they have also been marginalized in other aspects of our national life. Their minoritization involved, mainly the state machinery, with unwitting participation from the major segments of the population. It is not our intention to find fault, merely to lay down the facts in the hope that we may be able to help secure for them a well deserved social space in the Filipino nation. Their situation is not beyond help. This presentation is divided into four parts. Part I is on the Lumad communities and their ancestral domains in Mindanao. Part II focuses on the process of marginalization. Part III discusses the actual process of dispossession. Part IV explores the tri-people approach to peace and development in the region. PART I The Lumad Communities and Their Ancestral Domains in Mindanao The Lumad are the Indigenous Cultural Communities of Mindanao, namely, in alphabetical order: the Ata, Bagobo, Banwaon, Bla-an, Bukidnon, Dibabawon, Higaunon, Mamanwa, Mandaya, Mangguwangan, Manobo, Mansaka, Matigsalug, Subanen, Tagakaolo, Talaandig, T'boli, Teduray and Ubo.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Battle of Marawi': Death and Destruction in the Philippines
    ‘THE BATTLE OF MARAWI’ DEATH AND DESTRUCTION IN THE PHILIPPINES Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International 2017 Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Cover photo: Military trucks drive past destroyed buildings and a mosque in what was the main battle (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. area in Marawi, 25 October 2017, days after the government declared fighting over. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode © Ted Aljibe/AFP/Getty Images For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2017 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: ASA 35/7427/2017 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS MAP 4 1. INTRODUCTION 5 2. METHODOLOGY 10 3. BACKGROUND 11 4. UNLAWFUL KILLINGS BY MILITANTS 13 5. HOSTAGE-TAKING BY MILITANTS 16 6. ILL-TREATMENT BY GOVERNMENT FORCES 18 7. ‘TRAPPED’ CIVILIANS 21 8. LOOTING BY ALL PARTIES TO THE CONFLICT 23 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Contesting Land and Identity in the Periphery: the Moro Indigenous People of Southern Philippines*
    Contesting Land and Identity In The Periphery: The Moro Indigenous * People of Southern Philippines MYRTHENA L. FIANZA Department of Political Studies Mindanao State University (Main campus, Marawi) Philippines INTRODUCTION Over the past decades, the resurgence of intergroup conflict in the Philippines has led to a significant current in the direction of ethnicity and identity in the study of land tenure problems where the post-colonial state is involved, particularly in land use and resource allocation among indigenous communities. In the Philippine contemporary tenure situation, it is necessary to look at other categories or identities to understand how social unrest has been catalyzed in other areas of the country, as state action and politics in the center are also presently being shaped, more than ever before, by the demands of ethnicity or indigenous voices at the fringe or periphery. This course leads to approaching conflicts as rooted to the land question triggered by the issue of equitable access to land and resources or rights to a territory that contesting groups view should be acquired or reclaimed not solely on the basis of economic rights to private property in the Western liberal sense, or from a more progressive standpoint of redistributive (“land to the tiller”) reform, but as a determinant of the survival of a community and their culture, the basis of their identity as a people. The study proceeds from the perspective that views land as “tied up with the very ethnicity of indigenous peoples, inasmuch as their distinct cultures have developed in interaction with and in adaptation to specific environments” (Cariňo,1994: 5).
    [Show full text]
  • The Philippines: the Challenges of Moro and Lumad Power-Sharing in the Bangsamoro
    Conflict Studies Quarterly The Philippines: The Challenges of Moro and Lumad Power-sharing in the Bangsamoro Jose Mikhail PEREZ Abstract: Two self-ascribed ethnic groups—Moro and Lumad—are native to Mindanao in the southern Philippines. Both groups share a common history of oppression from Western colonial- ism, Christian resettlement, and capitalist interests where the former has waged a more organized insurgency against the Philippine government in the late twentieth century. Due to the political superiority of the Moros, the Lumads are often left marginalized in the various peace processes in Mindanao due to their accommodation to the Moro’s call for the creation of anautonomous region under an internal power-sharing agreement. This form of double marginalization against the Lumad promotes a sense of internal colonialism where such arrangements are only left between the Bangsamoro regional government and the Philippine national government, thereby forcing the latter to accommodate to Moro interests. Analyzing the text of the recent peace agreements between the Republic of the Philippines and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (GRP-MILF), Moros and Lumads under power-sharing and power-dividing measures. The article concludes that consociationalismin ethnicallythe article dividedattempts societies to understand often lead the to conflict more ethnicdynamics cleavages between if done haphazardly to favor certain interests while leaving ethnic minorities at a disadvantage. Keywords: Moro, Lumad, Mindanao, Bangsamoro, consociationalism, identity politics. Jose Mikhail PEREZ Introduction Department of Political Science, University of the Philippines Diliman, In the longue durée, the people of Mindanao Philippines in the southern Philippines have suffered E-mail: [email protected] past three decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Access Version Via Utrecht University Repository
    Understanding Conflict Dynamics: A Comparative Analysis of Ethno-Separatist Conflicts in India and the Philippines Voor een beter begrip van conflictdynamiek: een vergelijkende analyse van etnisch- seperatistische conflicten in India en de Filippijnen (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof.dr. G.J. van der Zwaan, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op vrijdag 18 oktober 2013 des middags te 2.30 uur door Alastair Grant Reed geboren op 7 december 1978 te Oxford, United Kingdom PROMOTOREN: Prof.dr. D.A. Hellema Prof.dr. B.G.J. de Graaff Prof.dr. I.G.B.M. Duyvesteyn This thesis was accomplished with financial support from the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO). CONTENTS Acknowledgements ix 1 Introduction 1 The research question 3 A survey of theories on irregular conflicts 7 Causes of conflicts 9 How conflicts progress after they have started 15 The role of the state 21 The population and popular support 26 The role of peace processes 28 Theories of foreign support/international relations 30 Theories on geography 31 How violence ends 33 Theoretical insights 35 The research model 36 Research design 44 Case study selection 49 Why Asia? 51 Originality claim 56 2 The Naga Insurgency 59 Part 1: The background to the conflict 59 Part 2: The phases of the Naga Insurgency 64 Phase 1: 1947 to 1957 – a national struggle 65 Phase 2: 1957 to 1964 – the road
    [Show full text]
  • Capacities for Inclusive Peace in the Bangsamoro: Gathering Civil Society Perspectives
    Civil Society Dialogue Network Geographic Meeting Capacities for inclusive peace in the Bangsamoro: Gathering civil society perspectives 20 – 21 June 2018 Dusit Thani Manila Ayala Center, 1223 Makati City, Manila REPORT Background Recent events in Marawi have once again highlighted that Bangamoro communities face continued threats to human security, adding to the uncertainty surrounding a future Bangsamoro entity. Whatever the progress and outcome of the current legislative process for the Bangsamoro Basic Law (BBL) and a later plebiscite, there will be opportunity as well as risk, as there will be moments when fixed positions, mindsets, practices and relationships can potentially be transformed. Therefore, the perspectives of civil society stakeholders living in and/or working on Mindanao are vital to understanding the priorities of those that will be most affected by any transition period towards a new Bangsamoro political entity. This workshop aimed to take a snapshot of civil society perspectives, identify new opportunities for change and reflect on how local, national and international actors, including the European Union (EU), can better support the peace process in Mindanao. It focused on local governance and dialogue and brought together local, regional, and national civil society analysts and representatives. In the workshop, participants shared their vision for a future Bangsamoro entity, their views on the current challenges to the peace process and the role of civil society in a transition. Participants provided input on what shifts in local governance and approaches to dialogue they thought were necessary and how civil society could best support - and be supported - to promote peaceful outcomes. Page 1 of 27 TABLE OF CONTENT Acronyms 3 Summary Report 5 Section 1: Guidance for engagement on Bangsamoro local governance 8 Section 2: Guidance for promoting and supporting meaningful intra-Bangsamoro dialogues 15 Annex 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    0 SITUATION ANALYSIS Children in Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao FINAL DRAFT 1 Note on the Geographic Focus of the Report This Situation Analysis of Children in BARMM is a UNICEF contribution to knowledge on the situation of children in the Philippines. It follows the recent publication of the Government- UNICEF report on the national Situation Analysis of Children in the Philippines. The report was prepared by UNICEF in consultation with the Regional Government of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM). While the data was collected under the Regional Government of ARMM during 2017, the analysis does not change significantly under the new BARMM geographic area and highlights significant multi-dimensional bottlenecks in the delivery of and access to key social services. The report shows that outcomes for children are significantly worse for children and highlights the need for additional and accelerated support within BARMM, if the Philippines is to reach the SDG targets. Rights and Permissions The material in this work is subject to copyright. UNICEF encourages dissemination of its information, data and analysis, this report may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Any queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to UNICEF Philippines, 14th Floor. North Tower Rockwell Business Centre Sheridan, United Street, Greenfields District, Mandalyuong City 1550, Philippines email: [email protected] Coram International @ Coram Children’s Legal Centre (CCLC) 2017 Commissioned by: UNICEF Philippines Cover Image: Shehzad Noorani/UNICEF Philippines 0 © United Nations Children’s Fund, Philippines.
    [Show full text]
  • Print Asia Revise
    Asia revise 6/11/06 12:53 pm Page 47 Peace with the Moros of the Philippines Peace with the Moros of the Philippines: An independent assessment Benedicto R. Bacani Established in 1984, the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) is a breakaway group of the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF). The MILF rejects the peace pact the MNLF signed with the Government of the Republic of the Philippines (GRP) on September 2, 1996. Specifically, the MILF considers the political autonomy granted to the Moro people under the 1996 GRP-MNLF Final Peace Agreement as inadequate and unresponsive to the root causes of the conflict. Thus, even as Manila was negotiating with the MNLF,the MILF quietly built up 4 its armed forces and mass base of supporters. By the time Manila concluded negotiations with the MNLF, the MILF had become a formidable force with more than 12,000 armed fighters. Even so, encouraged by his success with the MNLF, President Fidel Ramos sent overtures to the MILF as early as August 1996.The MILF responded positively, emboldened as it was by the political will demonstrated by President Ramos, and intrigued by the chance to further its Islamic agenda.The GRP-MILF peace process officially began in October 1996 with the formation of the GRP and MILF technical com- mittees on cessation of hostilities and agenda-setting. The heart of the GRP-MILF peace talks is the MILF’s demand for the return and recognition of Moro ancestral domain.The MILF’s draft proposal to the talks defines ancestral domain as all lands and areas, including the environment and natural resources therein, of the Bangsamoro people, established through occupation, posses- sion and dominion since time immemorial by cultural bond, customary law,historic rights and legal titles.
    [Show full text]
  • Solving the Moro Problem: Legalizing the Bangsamoro Peace Process
    Technological University Dublin ARROW@TU Dublin Articles Law 2016-3 Solving the Moro problem: legalizing the Bangsamoro peace process Gene Carolan Technological University Dublin, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://arrow.tudublin.ie/aaschlawart Part of the International Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Carolan,G. (2016) "Solving the Moro problem: legalizing the Bangsamoro peace process," (2016) 8(3) Journal of Aggression, Conflict and eaceP Research, 212. DOI 10.1108/JACPR-02-2016-0214 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law at ARROW@TU Dublin. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of ARROW@TU Dublin. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License Funder: Maynooth University Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research Solving the Moro problem: legalizing the Bangsamoro peace process Gene Carolan Article information: To cite this document: Gene Carolan , (2016),"Solving the Moro problem: legalizing the Bangsamoro peace process", Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, Vol. 8 Iss 3 pp. 212 - 223 Permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-02-2016-0214 Downloaded on: 22 June 2016, At: 03:34 (PT) References: this document contains references to 55 other documents. To copy this document: [email protected] The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 6 times since 2016* Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by Token:JournalAuthor:B0D8FCC2- EF0E-49B6-804D-2C7FBD5BA1CD: For Authors If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Moro Human Rights Under The
    THE STATE OF MORO HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER THE GPH-MILF PEACE AGREEMENT MORO-CHRISTIAN PEOPLE’S ALLIANCE SUBMISSION TO THE OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER ON HUMAN RIGHTS FOR THE 27TH SESSION OF THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW OF THE PHILIPPINE GOVERNMENT IN THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL IN MAY 2017 CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY II. THE GPH-MILF PEACE TALKS: Insincerity and Treachery in Achieving Long and Lasting Peace in the Bangsamoro Homeland III. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Moro people, or the Bangsamoro, refer to the 13 ethno-linguistic groups in the Philippines which had embraced Islam since the 13th century, namely: the Tausugs, Maguindanaw, Maranaw, Yakan, Iranun, Samal, Sangil, Badjao, Jama Mapun, Kalagan, Kalibugan, Palawani and Molbog. They comprise 5.1 percent of the Philippine population, and can be found mainly in Central Mindanao, Basilan, Sulu, Tawi-Tawi and Palawan. Their Islam faith gave Moros a distinct character and context in their right for self-determination, different from indigenous peoples. At present, land remains the primary problem of the Bangsamoro, with majority of the population still landless. The provinces under the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) continue to be mired in poverty, ranking highest in poverty incidence in 2012. Up to 70 percent live below the poverty line, and denied of basic services, such as health and education. In the 13th Session of the Universal Periodic Review of the Philippine Government in the United Nations Human Rights Council in May – June 2012, the Moro-Christian People’s Alliance (MCPA) made its first submission to the Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights --- the human rights situation of the Moro people in the Philippines, highlighting the plight of the more than 100 Moro political detainees who are intentional victims of mistaken identity; sacrificial lambs in exchange for more ‘anti-terrorist’ US military aid, or bounty from the US ‘reward for justice system’for captured ‘terrorist’.
    [Show full text]