UNDERSTANDING the DEFENSE STRATEGY of SADDAM HUSSEIN by Ibrahim Al-Marashi*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UNDERSTANDING the DEFENSE STRATEGY of SADDAM HUSSEIN by Ibrahim Al-Marashi* THE STRUGGLE FOR IRAQ: UNDERSTANDING THE DEFENSE STRATEGY OF SADDAM HUSSEIN By Ibrahim al-Marashi* This article analyzes how the Iraqi regime portrayed the war to its people and conducted it on both a military and political level. Using earlier captured Iraqi documents it analyzes the regime's strategies and techniques for both controlling and mobilizing the population. Saddam's choice of a defensive strategy to force a lengthy war of attrition was his best possible one, based on his hope that his enemies would lack the patience or courage to continue the war and also that domestic and international pressures would force his opponents to let his regime survive. "Military training is the central path that implication was that Saddam was fighting has no substitute, to make the soldier for all the Arabs and that he would win a proficient in militarism and able to serve tremendous and total victory. the Iraqi nation, the people and Arab nation That earlier battle, which took place in from this location." 637 AD, led by the Arab general Sa'd ibn Waqqas lasted for three days, resulting in The President Leader, Saddam the death of both the Persian general Hussein (1) Rustum as well as the end of Persian Sassanian rule in Iraq.(2) The collapse of While there has been massive coverage the Zoroastrian Iranian forces at al- and analysis of the 2003 Anglo-American Qadisiyya allowed the Arabs to spread war with Iraq regarding the Western Islam eastward, thus giving the battle a perspective of the fighting, relatively little religious significance. As Ofra Bengio has attention has been paid to how the war was written, "The myths woven around al- waged from the Iraqi side, tactically or Qadisiyya are a most instructive example conceptually. For example, the Anglo- of the Ba'thi technique of using an event American operation's official name was with a core historical truth that is deeply "Iraqi Freedom," and most Arab circles etched into collective memory in order to called it "al-Harb al-Khalijiyya al-Thalitha" further the party's ideology of Arab (The Third Gulf War) but what did the nationalism and to appeal to the public by Saddam regime call it? means of a challenge of great emotional The Iran-Iraq War of 1980-1988 was power."(3) not referred to as such in the official Iraqi Thus, by invoking the name of al- discourse but rather as Qadisiyat Saddam, Qadisiyya, Saddam justified his war as a coupling the leader's name with the first continuation of the struggle between battle ever fought in history between the Persian and Arab. Saddam's label of the Persians and Arabs, in which the Arab Iran-Iraq war as al-Qadisiyya revealed his Muslims emerged victorious. The vision of how the war should end: a Middle East Review of International Affairs, Vol. 7, No. 2 (June, 2003) 1 Ibrahim al-Marashi decisive Arab victory over the Persian achieve a spectacular sequence of rapid masses, leading to the complete surrender military victories."(5) of the Iranian nation. Saddam, too, can be said to have The 1991 Gulf war was termed combined serious misperceptions of the "Operation Desert Storm" by the Coalition world, including a profound belief in forces, while Saddam used the term, "Umm conspiracies, with a shrewd sense of the Kul al-Ma'arik" or "the Mother of all political behavior and strategies required Battles". This euphemistic title for the by his position. Claims of conspiracies also 1991 war reveals Saddam's emphasis on justified many of the regime's policies and the scope and severity of the impending garnered loyalty to them by the security war with the United States. Nevertheless, apparatus and sometimes by the population the regime believed it would emerge at large. victorious. In a military memo circulated As one example of the regime's use of among military units it states, "We are this method, here are two statements guaranteed victory because we are standing justifying Iraq's possession and possible up to 30 nations, and that is a point of pride use of chemical weapons in an official for us."(4) This statement infers that if the training manual.(6) These weapons were regime survives the "mother of all battles" needed: that would mean a victory no matter what happened on the battlefield itself. And by …as a result of the American- this measure, the regime could well claim Zionist union against our country in to have won the 1991 war. order to steal the natural resources Saddam euphemistically referred to of the Arab world, under an Iraqi Operation Freedom as Ma'rakat Al- international umbrella and the Hawasim, "The Defining Battle," to decision of the Security Council mobilize the Iraqi masses against the and the distortion of facts by some impending American attack in 2003. of the traitorous Arab leaders like Perhaps the rhetorical use of this title the [king of Saudi Arabia] and indicated that this was the final, defining [President] Husni Mubarak [of battle of the regime. Like almost Egypt]. And as a result of the everything that happened in Iraq between concentration of the hostile around 1973 and 2003, that matter was forces…in preparations for highly dependent on the mindset of unleashing hostilities on our dear Saddam Hussein. country: Christopher Andrew of Cambridge [Intelligence] reports have University points out that analysis of indicated the possession of the Saddam Hussein has vacillated between American-Zionist union of characterizing him as a rational, logical chemical weapons, and their ill actor, and a fanatic, isolated from reality. intention to use them against our "The most dangerous fanatics, however, country to increase our losses in combine elements of both--they are shrewd persons, equipments, weapons and operators with deranged views. Though preparations.(7) Hitler was obsessed by the preposterous theory of a Jewish plot for world mastery, Yet it would be a mistake to overstate he was also remarkably astute--outwitting Saddam's irrational side--noting that even Western statesmen before the Second the purveying of conspiracy theories often World War and driving his generals to served as a practical political measure for the regime. Indeed, an examination of 2 Middle East Review of International Affairs, Vol. 7, No. 2 (June, 2003) The Struggle for Iraq: Understanding the Defense Strategy of Saddam Hussein Saddam's strategy in the 2003 war shows Essentially, Saddam's end game was not how it parallels the strategy that he used in a victory for the Iraqi nation, but a victory 1991. It is vital to make a distinction for the regime itself. As one pre-war between the mistakes Saddam made in assessment put it, most Iraqi military blundering into a war under unfavorable leaders knew "that Iraq cannot resist a U.S. circumstances and his choice of the best assault, but could only hope to make the possible--though limited and difficult-- U.S. entry as costly as possible as soon in option once faced with fighting such a the war as possible, and then to draw out conflict. the fighting into Baghdad to the point In both wars, Saddam realized that he where the U.S. media would make could not achieve a military victory against continued U.S. engagement untenable."(9) vastly superior U.S. forces. His goal in Essentially, this comment echoes the goals both conflicts was to emerge with a laid out for the Iraqi military in the January political victory by ensuring the survival of 14, 1991 directive to the Iraqi army. his regime, just as Nasser had done in 1956 when a losing war guaranteed his place as SADDAM'S DEFENSE STRATEGY champion of the Arab world. The military defense of Iraq was most The manner in which Saddam organized likely coordinated by Saddam through the the defense of Iraq in both wars Ba'th Party Military Bureau, the body demonstrated that his goal was to ensure a which managed Iraqi defense and security protracted conflict, inflicting as many issues during the 1991 Gulf War, as well as Allied casualties as possible, in the hope selected high ranking military officers.(10) that his opponents' impatience, spiritual The Bureau was subordinated to the party weakness or internal conflicts forced them chairman, Saddam Hussein, who was also to give up. its general secretary. Saddam, not the A document dated January 14, 1991, minister of defense, was thus the highest two days before the commencement of military authority in Iraq. Given the nature Operation Desert Storm reveals Saddam's of the system he established, his active and strategy and bears a striking resemblance to direct control was absolutely necessary for the strategy employed during this conflict. the morale and functioning of the Iraqi Directives to commanders of the Iraqi army armed forces and to provide leadership. bluntly indicate that Iraq is at a Prior to the commencement of technological disadvantage: "The enemy Operation Iraqi Freedom, Saddam had has different equipment. There is a divided Iraq into four military command difference between Iraqi soldiers and zones. Yet it appeared that Saddam set the American soldiers in methodology, size, overall strategy along a three-tiered etc." The following directive orders, "Try approach. The first line of defense was the to cause many casualties and have a long regular Iraqi military. The Republican war. Wait underground for the end of the Guard would defend the capital from air attack. Utilize propaganda. Do not leave outside it. The Special Republican Guard Kuwait. Have self-confidence."(8) and the military units of Iraq's intelligence Essentially, the document suggests that the organizations would defend Baghdad from Iraqi army, in the face of overwhelming within.
Recommended publications
  • 1989 Meeting Between Saddam and Senior Iraqi Officials Discussing The
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified 1989 Meeting between Saddam and Senior Iraqi Officials Discussing the Execution of British Journalist Farzad Bazoft, Modifications to Iraq's Constitution, and an Israeli Attack on Iraq's Nuclear Reactor Citation: “Meeting between Saddam and Senior Iraqi Officials Discussing the Execution of British Journalist Farzad Bazoft, Modifications to Iraq's Constitution, and an Israeli Attack on Iraq's Nuclear Reactor,” 1989, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, Conflict Records Research Center, National Defense University, SH-SHTP-A-000-910 http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/110542 Summary: Transcript of a meeting between Saddam Hussein and his officials to discuss changes to the Iraqi constitution. Also includes discussion about British Journalist Farzad Bazoft who was arrested as an Iranian spy working for Israel and Britain. Original Language: Arabic Contents: English Translation “Meeting between Saddam and Senior Iraqi Officials Discussing the Execution of British Journalist Farzad Bazoft, Modifications to Iraq's Constitution, and an Israeli Attack on Iraq's Nuclear Reactor” Document Date: Undated (sometime after 1989) CRRC Record Number: SH-SHTP-A-000-910 SH-SHTP-A-000-910 Key: UM = Unidentified Male Speaker Translator Comments, clarifications, and additions are italicized in brackets. Saddam Hussein: [This conversation was already in progress] All of you must circulate the summary of this spy issue to our ambassadors immediately. Tariq Aziz: Yes, [inaudible]. Saddam Hussein: You should deal with them [British reporter Farzad Bazoft and British nurse Daphne Parish] normally. In brief, he [Bazoft] is an Israeli spy; I mean he is an Israeli spy working for the British.
    [Show full text]
  • Hd122-Xxx.Ps
    1 108th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 108–122 BLOCKING PROPERTY OF THE FORMER IRAQI RE- GIME, ITS SENIOR OFFICIALS AND THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS, AND TAKING CERTAIN OTHER ACTIONS COMMUNICATION FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TRANSMITTING NOTIFICATION TO EXPAND THE SCOPE OF THE NATIONAL EMER- GENCY DECLARED IN EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 13303 OF MAY 22, 2003, WITH RESPECT TO THE BLOCKING OF PROPERTY OF THE FORMER IRAQI REGIME, ITS SENIOR OFFICIALS AND THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS, AND TAKING CERTAIN OTHER ACTIONS, PURSUANT TO 50 U.S.C. 1703(b) AND 50 U.S.C. 1631 SEPTEMBER 3, 2003.—Referred to the Committee on International Relations and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 19–011 WASHINGTON : 2003 VerDate jul 14 2003 06:52 Sep 06, 2003 Jkt 019011 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HD122.XXX HD122 E:\Seals\Congress.#13 VerDate jul 14 2003 06:52 Sep 06, 2003 Jkt 019011 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HD122.XXX HD122 THE WHITE HOUSE, Washington, August 28, 2003. Hon. J. DENNIS HASTERT, Speaker of the House of Representatives, Washington, DC. DEAR MR. SPEAKER: Consistent with section 204(b) of the Inter- national Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), 50 U.S.C. 1703(b), and section 301 of the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. 1631, I hereby report that I have exercised my authority to expand the scope of the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 of May 22, 2003, to address the unusual and extraor- dinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by obstacles to the orderly reconstruction of Iraq, the restoration and maintenance of peace and security in that country, and the development of political, administrative, and eco- nomic institutions, in Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a the Ali Hassan Al-Majid Tapes the Following Are Selected Remarks by Ali Hassan Al-Majid, Secretary General of The
    Appendix A The Ali Hassan Al-Majid Tapes The following are selected remarks by Ali Hassan al-Majid, Secretary General of the Ba'ath Party's Northern Bureau, from a number of meetings with senior Ba'ath officials in 1988 and 1989. Audiotapes of more than a dozen of these meetings were recovered from Iraqi government offices and from al-Majid's home in Kirkuk during the failed Kurdish uprising in March 1991. 1. Meeting with members of the Northern Bureau and governors of the Autonomous Region of Iraqi Kurdistan, April 15, 1988. By next summer there will be no more villages remaining spread out here and there, but only complexes. It'll be just like the hen when she puts the chicks under her wing. We'll put the people in the complexes and keep an eye on them. We'll no longer let them live in the villages where the saboteurs can go and visit them. Emigration from the villages to the city is necessary in the north of Iraq. From now on I won't give the villagers flour, sugar, kerosene, water or electricity as long as they continue living there. Let them come closer to me to hear me, so that I can tell them the things I believe and want in ideology, education and common sense. Why should I let them live there like donkeys who don't know anything? For the wheat? I don't want their wheat. We've been importing wheat for the last twenty years. Let's increase it for another five years.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribes and Empire on the Margins of Nineteenth-Century Iran
    publications on the near east publications on the near east Poetry’s Voice, Society’s Song: Ottoman Lyric The Transformation of Islamic Art during Poetry by Walter G. Andrews the Sunni Revival by Yasser Tabbaa The Remaking of Istanbul: Portrait of an Shiraz in the Age of Hafez: The Glory of Ottoman City in the Nineteenth Century a Medieval Persian City by John Limbert by Zeynep Çelik The Martyrs of Karbala: Shi‘i Symbols The Tragedy of Sohráb and Rostám from and Rituals in Modern Iran the Persian National Epic, the Shahname by Kamran Scot Aghaie of Abol-Qasem Ferdowsi, translated by Ottoman Lyric Poetry: An Anthology, Jerome W. Clinton Expanded Edition, edited and translated The Jews in Modern Egypt, 1914–1952 by Walter G. Andrews, Najaat Black, and by Gudrun Krämer Mehmet Kalpaklı Izmir and the Levantine World, 1550–1650 Party Building in the Modern Middle East: by Daniel Goffman The Origins of Competitive and Coercive Rule by Michele Penner Angrist Medieval Agriculture and Islamic Science: The Almanac of a Yemeni Sultan Everyday Life and Consumer Culture by Daniel Martin Varisco in Eighteenth-Century Damascus by James Grehan Rethinking Modernity and National Identity in Turkey, edited by Sibel Bozdog˘an and The City’s Pleasures: Istanbul in the Eigh- Res¸at Kasaba teenth Century by Shirine Hamadeh Slavery and Abolition in the Ottoman Middle Reading Orientalism: Said and the Unsaid East by Ehud R. Toledano by Daniel Martin Varisco Britons in the Ottoman Empire, 1642–1660 The Merchant Houses of Mocha: Trade by Daniel Goffman and Architecture in an Indian Ocean Port by Nancy Um Popular Preaching and Religious Authority in the Medieval Islamic Near East Tribes and Empire on the Margins of Nine- by Jonathan P.
    [Show full text]
  • Eco-TERRORIST ACTS DURING the PERSIAN GULF WAR: IS INTERNATIONAL LAW SUFFICIENT to HOLD IRAQ LIABLE?
    EcO-TERRORIST ACTS DURING THE PERSIAN GULF WAR: IS INTERNATIONAL LAW SUFFICIENT TO HOLD IRAQ LIABLE? I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND On August 2, 1990, Iraqi forces overtook Kuwait in a "lightning- like" conquest.' In response to the invasion, the United Nations marshalled an international coalition which ultimately drove Iraq out of Kuwait. 2 However, the aftermath of Iraq's occupation of and retreat from Kuwait was devastating; a 350 square mile oil slick in 4 the Persian Gulf,3 thousands of dead or dying birds and other wildlife, and over 550 burning Kuwaiti oil wells5 were the legacy of Iraq's occupation. The attempt at wholesale destruction of Kuwait and the Persian Gulf led several commentators to coin the terms "ecocide" and "environmental terrorism" to describe Iraq's actions.6 Incredibly, however, the devastation of Kuwait and the Gulf was foreseeable. I Walter V. Robinson, Iraq Tightens Its Control Over Kuwait; 'Revolutionary' Regime Installed;Arab Leaders Withhold Criticism; The Invasion of Kuwait, BOSTON GLOBE, Aug. 3, 1990, at 1. 2 Bush Halts Offensive Combat; Kuwait Freed; Iraqis Crushed, N.Y. TndEs, Feb. 28, 1991, at 1; see, e.g., Bob Hepburn, Kuwait's Oil-Fire Nightmare Lifting; Real Impact of Catastrophe Will Take Months to Judge, TORONTO STAR, July 20, 1991, at A3 (noting the environmental damage Iraq inflicted in retreat); see also Nick B. Williams, Jr., Middle East Still Suffers from Fallout of Warfare; Legacy: Rubble Clearing Goes On, and the Historical Impact of Iraq's Defeat Is Not Yet In View, L.A. Trms, Jan. 17, 1992, at Al (stating ground offensive drove Iraqi army from Kuwait in only four days).
    [Show full text]
  • Ba'ath Propaganda During the Iran-Iraq War Jennie Matuschak [email protected]
    Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Honors Theses Student Theses Spring 2019 Nationalism and Multi-Dimensional Identities: Ba'ath Propaganda During the Iran-Iraq War Jennie Matuschak [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses Part of the International Relations Commons, and the Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons Recommended Citation Matuschak, Jennie, "Nationalism and Multi-Dimensional Identities: Ba'ath Propaganda During the Iran-Iraq War" (2019). Honors Theses. 486. https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses/486 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. iii Acknowledgments My first thanks is to my advisor, Mehmet Döşemeci. Without taking your class my freshman year, I probably would not have become a history major, which has changed my outlook on the world. Time will tell whether this is good or bad, but for now I am appreciative of your guidance. Also, thank you to my second advisor, Beeta Baghoolizadeh, who dealt with draft after draft and provided my thesis with the critiques it needed to stand strongly on its own. Thank you to my friends for your support and loyalty over the past four years, which have pushed me to become the best version of myself. Most importantly, I value the distractions when I needed a break from hanging out with Saddam. Special shout-out to Andrew Raisner for painstakingly reading and editing everything I’ve written, starting from my proposal all the way to the final piece.
    [Show full text]
  • Irregular Warfare: a Case Study in Cia and Us Army Special Forces Operations in Northern Iraq, 2002-03
    IRREGULAR WARFARE: A CASE STUDY IN CIA AND US ARMY SPECIAL FORCES OPERATIONS IN NORTHERN IRAQ, 2002-03 THE MIDDLE EAST INSTITUTE ANDREW L., MICK MULROY, AND KEN TOVO AUGUST 2021 WWW.MEI.EDU ABOUT THE MIDDLE EAST INSTITUTE The Middle East Institute is a center of knowledge dedicated to narrowing divides between the peoples of the Middle East and the United States. With over 70 years’ experience, MEI has established itself as a credible, non-partisan source of insight and policy analysis on all matters concerning the Middle East. MEI is distinguished by its holistic approach to the region and its deep understanding of the Middle East’s political, economic and cultural contexts. Through the collaborative work of its three centers — Policy & Research, Arts & Culture, and Education — MEI provides current and future leaders with the resources necessary to build a future of mutual understanding. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Andrew L. “Uncle Andy” is a retired Senior Intelligence Service Paramilitary Operations Officer in the Special Activities Center with 25 years of service in the CIA. He is a former U.S. Marine infantry and reconnaissance officer. Michael “Mick” Patrick Mulroy Mick Mulroy is the former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Middle East. He is also a retired CIA Paramilitary Operations Officer in the Special Activities Center and a United States Marine. He is a Senior Fellow for the Middle East Institute, an ABC News National Security Analyst, and a co-founder of Lobo Institute. Kenneth “Ken” Tovo Lieutenant General (Ret.) Ken Tovo retired from the U.S. Army in 2018 with 35 years of service.
    [Show full text]
  • MIDDLE EAST WATCH OVERVIEW Human Rights Developments The
    MIDDLE EAST WATCH OVERVIEW Human Rights Developments The political earthquake that shook the Middle East on September 13, when Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) signed an interim self-government accord, may have marked the beginning of the end of the forty-five-year-old Arab-Israeli conflict. In the medium term, it may also come to mark a parallel improvement in human rights conditionsCnot just in the Israeli-occupied territories, but in those frontline states that have long used the conflict as a pretext for violations of the fundamental rights of their own peoples. Such aspirations could, equally, prove to be mere wishful thinking: human rights per se figured little in the interstate negotiations that took place during 1993, and few officials from any party to the talks, including the United States, publicly articulated concern for human rights. Under prodding, PLO Chairman Yassir Arafat was one of those who did, after the signing; but, misgivings persisted as to whether the PLO was truly committed to a future in which respect for human rights and a pluralistic democracy would be realized. In counterpoint, there were no early signs of an Israeli reassessment of long-established abusive policies and practices in the occupied territories. Welcome though the Israel-PLO agreement was as an augury of peace, in the region as a wholeCfrom the Maghreb states of North Africa to IranCthe accord was overshadowed by a broader conflict with pervasive implications for human rights: a contest for power, ideological domination, and control over social behavior between insurgent Islamists and established regimes, themselves often of little popular legitimacy and a secular, pro-Western cast.
    [Show full text]
  • At Mazandaran Through Tourism Approach
    Current World Environment Vol. 10(Special Issue 1), 967-978 (2015) Thinking Relatively on Nature Concept with Creating “Modern Tourism Space” at Mazandaran through Tourism Approach MOHADDESE YAZARLOU Department of Architecture, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran. http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.10.Special-Issue1.116 (Received: November, 2014; Accepted: April, 2015) Abstract Tourism industry, as the most diverse industry across the world, has some subsets. One of the Iran architectural manifestations is caravanserai which has been built on various historical eras. The most improved periods of construction and renovation of caravanserai was belonged to safavid time. Iran at safavid era was regarded as an important linking loop to international traffic. Many passengers came to Iran from various sites. Some were political agents and some other was traders who had travelled to Iran for various reasons, from other countries. Thus building caravanserai, that were considered as a hotel to international and national guests, was regarded so essential at safavid era. For this reason, Safavid Sultans (kings) had regarded it as a necessary point and started to construct caravanserai. In this era, particularly at first shah-Abbas time. Construct of caravanserai had been conducted along with ways and roads constructions and their repairs. Such human-made buildings, have been constructed across global world at various era, sometimes they was established in a region based on its special style and sometimes based on predominant government style. Nowadays, tourism development is known as a nations aims to enter foreign exchange. Regard to present economic problems such as unemployment, poor efficiency at agriculture section and over excess exploitation from natural resources, pay attention to other alternatives such as tourism, apparently is necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Forum June 2003 Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Building an Iraqi Defense Force by Joseph Mcmillan
    No. 198 Strategic Forum June 2003 Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Building an Iraqi Defense Force by Joseph McMillan The reconstruction and reform of the been not only the prominence of the armed Key Points Iraqi armed forces will inevitably take place in forces, but also the proliferation of security ith the demise of the Saddam the context of both Iraq’s present and past. services which have introduced a baneful 4 Hussein regime, a high priority Saddam Hussein and his predecessors, going logic to Iraq’s political life. W must be the rebuilding of the Iraqi back to the creation of the state, have left Iraq From the beginning, to be an officer was armed forces. The United States must super- a legacy of endemic domestic political vio- one of the main paths to political power and vise and assist in this task, but the template lence, dysfunctional civil-military relations, social advancement in Iraq. With the exception for the new force should not be the American and, in recent decades, an ideology of un- of the royal family, the makers of the Kingdom model—a joint, highly trained, all-volunteer remitting hostility to virtually every one of of Iraq were predominantly former officers of force that emphasizes quality over size. Iraq Iraq’s neighbors. the Ottoman Imperial Army, mainly Sunni does not need and cannot produce such a The use of Iraqi armed forces for internal Arabs from modest families who rose to the top U.S.-style force. repression is often associated with Saddam.
    [Show full text]
  • US Blunders in Iraq: De-Baathification and Disbanding the Army
    Intelligence and National Security Vol. 25, No. 1, 76–85, February 2010 US Blunders in Iraq: De-Baathification and Disbanding the Army JAMES P. PFIFFNER ABSTRACT In May 2003 Paul Bremer issued CPA Orders to exclude from the new Iraq government members of the Baath Party (CPA Order 1) and to disband the Iraqi Army (CPA Order 2). These two orders severely undermined the capacity of the occupying forces to maintain security and continue the ordinary functioning of the Iraq government. The decisions reversed previous National Security Council judgments and were made over the objections of high ranking military and intelligence officers. The article concludes that the most likely decision maker was the Vice President. Early in the occupation of Iraq two key decisions were made that gravely jeopardized US chances for success in Iraq: (1) the decision to bar from government work Iraqis who ranked in the top four levels of Sadam’s Baath Party or who held positions in the top three levels of each ministry; (2) the decision to disband the Iraqi Army and replace it with a new army built from scratch. These two fateful decisions were made against the advice of military and CIA professionals and without consulting important members of the President’s staff and cabinet. This article will first examine the de- Baathification order and then take up the even more far reaching decision to disband the Iraqi Army. Both of these decisions fueled the insurgency by: (1) alienating hundreds of thousands of Iraqis who could not support themselves or their families; (2) by undermining the normal infrastructure necessary for social and economic activity; (3) by ensuring that there was not sufficient security to carry on normal life; and (4) by creating insurgents who were angry at the US, many of whom had weapons and were trained to use them.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership Style and Diversionary
    Syracuse University SURFACE Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Political Science - Dissertations Affairs 2011 Leadership Style And Diversionary Theory Of Foreign Policy: The Use Of Diversionary Strategies By Middle Eastern Leaders During And In The Immediate Aftermath Of The Gulf War Kilic Bugra Kanat Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/psc_etd Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Kanat, Kilic Bugra, "Leadership Style And Diversionary Theory Of Foreign Policy: The Use Of Diversionary Strategies By Middle Eastern Leaders During And In The Immediate Aftermath Of The Gulf War" (2011). Political Science - Dissertations. 104. https://surface.syr.edu/psc_etd/104 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science - Dissertations by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract The diversionary theory of war is one of the most speculated about and debated theories in foreign policy literature. The theory argues that government leaders who are confronted with public antagonism over domestic economic, social, and political problems sometimes start wars to divert their populaces‘ attention from domestic problems and therefore to survive politically. Numerous foreign policy conflicts have been interpreted as being diversionary in nature and it has been commonplace for analysts to examine the domestic politics and problems of countries that engage in international conflict. Specifically, the use of force by US Presidents against external actors, such as U.S. President George H.W. Bush‘s operation against Grenada and the First Gulf War, and U.S.
    [Show full text]