Sub-National Food Security Cluster Meeting

27th March 2014

SOMALIA Agenda Standing items 1. Introductions 2. Review and agreement of previous minutes 3. Review/follow-up actions from previous meeting 4. Access constraints 5. Presentation of district level information by response objective, activity and planned versus actual 6. Review of gaps per district and Response Discussion 7. AOB

Access Constraints & Implications on Operations

To be completed for every meeting

SOMALIA Review of FSC Responses for Lower Juba (February 2014)

SOMALIA Cluster Members Responses by Response Priority

Region Improved Access Livelihood Investment Safety Net Responses No. No. No. No. No. Reached No. Reached Reported Reached Reported Reported Lower Juba 0 3 39,354 4 15,000 1

SOMALIA District Level Response i) Improved Access to Food & Safety Nets

Region District Emergency Safety Net Relief Responses Assistance Cash (Food/Cash/Vou cher Lower Juba 0 0 Badhadhe 0 0

Jamaame 0 0 0 15,000

SOMALIA District Level Response Safety Net Activity Breakdown – Planned and Actual -

TB/HIV/Household TB/HIV Hospital TSFP Region District Wet Feeding Support Support

Planned Actual Planned Actual Planned Actual Planned Actual Lower Juba Afmadow 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,600 0

Badhadhe 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,958 0

Jamaame 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Kismayo 112,500 15,000 500 0 3,000 0 0 0

SOMALIA District Level Response Livelihood Investment

Livelihood Region District investment Lower Juba Afmadow 14,310 Badhadhe 13,932

Jamaame 0

Kismayo 11,112

SOMALIA District Level Response ii) Livelihood Investment Activity Breakdown

Region District Assets Seasonal Inputs

Lower Juba Afmadow 180 14,130 Badhadhe 0 13,932 Jamaame 0 0 Kismayo 0 11,112

SOMALIA District Level Response ii) Livelihood Investment Activity Breakdown - Planned and Actual -

Animal Region District Assets Treatment/Vaccination

Planned Actual Planned Actual Lower Juba Afmadow 13,968 180 14,130 14,130

Badhadhe 1,240 0 13,932 13,932

Jamaame 0 0 0 0

Kismayo 21,534 0 88,590 11,112

SOMALIA Gap Analysis: Improved Access and Safety Net Afmadow Responses Legend L . J U B A Boundary

KISMAAYO Region Boundary Kismayo Feb. Improved Access and Safety Net Percentage 0 to 10 percent Badhadhe 10 to 25 percent 25 to 50 percent 50 to 75 percent 75+ percent SOMALIA Gap Analysis: Afmadow Livelihood U Investment Assets L . J U B A Responses

U Legend Jamame Region Capital District Boundary Region Boundary February Livelihood Assets GAP U KISMAAYO Gap magnitude Kismayo U < 20.000 U 20.000 to 100.000 U U > 100.000 Badhadhe February Livelihood Assets Percentage 0 to 10 percent 10 to 25 percent 25 to 50 percent SOMALIA 50 to 75 percent 75+ percent Gap Analysis: Afmadow Livelihood U Investment Inputs’ Responses Legend L . J U B A U Jamame Region Capital District Boundary Region Boundary Kismayo KISMAAYO February Livelihood input GAP U Gap magnitude U 0 to 20,000 U 20,000 to 100,000

U >100,000 Badhadhe U February Livelihood inputs Percentage 0 to 10 percent 10 to 25 percent 25 to 50 percent 50 to 75 percent SOMALIA 75+ percent Any Other Business

SOMALIA