Lower Juba Sub-National Food Security Cluster Meeting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Lower Juba Sub-National Food Security Cluster Meeting 27th March 2014 SOMALIA Agenda Standing items 1. Introductions 2. Review and agreement of previous minutes 3. Review/follow-up actions from previous meeting 4. Access constraints 5. Presentation of district level information by response objective, activity and planned versus actual 6. Review of gaps per district and Response Discussion 7. AOB SOMALIA Access Constraints & Implications on Operations To be completed for every meeting SOMALIA Review of FSC Responses for Lower Juba (February 2014) SOMALIA Cluster Members Responses by Response Priority Region Improved Access Livelihood Investment Safety Net Responses No. No. No. No. No. Reached No. Reached Reported Reached Reported Reported Lower Juba 0 3 39,354 4 15,000 1 SOMALIA District Level Response i) Improved Access to Food & Safety Nets Region District Emergency Safety Net Relief Responses Assistance Cash (Food/Cash/Vou cher Lower Juba Afmadow 0 0 Badhadhe 0 0 Jamaame 0 0 Kismayo 0 15,000 SOMALIA District Level Response Safety Net Activity Breakdown – Planned and Actual - TB/HIV/Household TB/HIV Hospital TSFP Region District Wet Feeding Support Support Planned Actual Planned Actual Planned Actual Planned Actual Lower Juba Afmadow 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,600 0 Badhadhe 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,958 0 Jamaame 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Kismayo 112,500 15,000 500 0 3,000 0 0 0 SOMALIA District Level Response Livelihood Investment Livelihood Region District investment Lower Juba Afmadow 14,310 Badhadhe 13,932 Jamaame 0 Kismayo 11,112 SOMALIA District Level Response ii) Livelihood Investment Activity Breakdown Region District Assets Seasonal Inputs Lower Juba Afmadow 180 14,130 Badhadhe 0 13,932 Jamaame 0 0 Kismayo 0 11,112 SOMALIA District Level Response ii) Livelihood Investment Activity Breakdown - Planned and Actual - Animal Region District Assets Treatment/Vaccination Planned Actual Planned Actual Lower Juba Afmadow 13,968 180 14,130 14,130 Badhadhe 1,240 0 13,932 13,932 Jamaame 0 0 0 0 Kismayo 21,534 0 88,590 11,112 SOMALIA Gap Analysis: Improved Access and Safety Net Afmadow Responses Legend L . J U B A Jamame District Boundary KISMAAYO Region Boundary Kismayo Feb. Improved Access and Safety Net Percentage 0 to 10 percent Badhadhe 10 to 25 percent 25 to 50 percent 50 to 75 percent 75+ percent SOMALIA Gap Analysis: Afmadow Livelihood U Investment Assets L . J U B A Responses U Legend Jamame Region Capital District Boundary Region Boundary February Livelihood Assets GAP U KISMAAYO Gap magnitude Kismayo U < 20.000 U 20.000 to 100.000 U U > 100.000 Badhadhe February Livelihood Assets Percentage 0 to 10 percent 10 to 25 percent 25 to 50 percent SOMALIA 50 to 75 percent 75+ percent Gap Analysis: Afmadow Livelihood U Investment Inputs’ Responses Legend L . J U B A U Jamame Region Capital District Boundary Region Boundary Kismayo KISMAAYO February Livelihood input GAP U Gap magnitude U 0 to 20,000 U 20,000 to 100,000 U >100,000 Badhadhe U February Livelihood inputs Percentage 0 to 10 percent 10 to 25 percent 25 to 50 percent 50 to 75 percent SOMALIA 75+ percent Any Other Business SOMALIA .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Refugee Status Appeals Authority New Zealand
REFUGEE STATUS APPEALS AUTHORITY NEW ZEALAND REFUGEE APPEAL NO 76551 AT AUCKLAND Before: B L Burson (Member) Counsel for the Appellant: D Ryken Appearing for the Department of Labour: No Appearance Dates of Hearing: 28 & 29 July 2010 Date of Decision: 21 September 2010 DECISION INTRODUCTION [1] This is an appeal against the decision of a refugee status officer of the Refugee Status Branch (RSB) of the Department of Labour (DOL) declining the grant of refugee status to the appellant, a national of Somalia who has spent a number of years in South Africa as a recognised Convention refugee. [2] This is the second time the appellant has appeared before the Authority. He originally arrived in New Zealand in June 2008 and lodged an application for refugee status. He was interviewed by the RSB in respect of that claim on 31 July and 1 August 2008. By decision dated 21 November 2008 the RSB declined the appellant’s claim on the basis that having been recognised as a refugee in South Africa the appellant was entitled to the protection of that country. The appellant duly appealed to the Authority. By decision dated 4 August 2009 the Authority dismissed the appellant’s appeal. [3] On 12 October 2009, the appellant lodged proceedings by way of judicial review in the High Court. By decision dated 4 June 2010 the High Court quashed the decision of the Authority. Although the High Court was satisfied the Authority 2 had not committed any reviewable error itself, the appellant’s previous representative had failed to ensure that a letter from a witness confirming the appellant’s clan origins was not placed before the Authority and the High Court reached the view that the Authority should, as a matter of fairness, re-assess the appellant’s claim having regard to this evidence.
[Show full text]
Human Rights and Security in Central and Southern Somalia
Danish 2/2004 Immigration Service ENG Human rights and security in central and southern Somalia Joint Danish, Finnish, Norwegian and British fact-finding mission to Nairobi, Kenya 7- 21 January 2004 Copenhagen, March 2004 The Danish Immigration Service Ryesgade 53 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø Phone: + 45 35 36 66 00 Website: www.udlst.dk E-mail: [email protected] List of reports on fact finding missions in 2003 and 2004 Sikkerheds- og beskyttelsesforhold for minoritetsbefolkninger, kvinder og børn i Somalia Marts 2003: 1 Menneskerettighedsforhold i Burundi Maj 2003: 2 Dobbeltstraf mv. i Serbien Maj 2003:3 Joint British-Danish Fact Finding Mission to Damascus, Amman and Geneva on Conditions in Iraq August 2003: 4 Indrejse- og opholdsbetingelser for statsløse palæstinensere i Libanon November 2003: 5 Sikkerheds- og menneskeretsforhold for rohingyaer i Burma og Bangladesh December 2003: 6 Fact-finding mission til Amman vedrørende asylrelevante forhold i Irak Januar 2004: 1 Human rights and security in central and southern Somalia Marts 2004 : 2 Human rights and security in central and southern Somalia Introduction........................................................................................................................5 1 Political developments ...................................................................................................7 1.1 Peace negotiations in Kenya ......................................................................................................7 1.2 Agreement on new Transitional Charter..................................................................................10
[Show full text]
Somalia: Researched and Compiled by the Refugee Documentation Centre of Ireland on 5 July 2010
Somalia: Researched and compiled by the Refugee Documentation Centre of Ireland on 5 July 2010 Information required on the Somali clans/tribes Marehan and Marjeteen, particularly their relations with the Bajuni Noufail Are the Bajuni Noufail being discriminated against by the other two clans? Information on the Somali clans/tribes Marehan and Marjeteen and their relations with the Bajuni was scarce among the sources consulted by the Refugee Documentation Centre within time constraints. Dr Joakim Gundel is quoted in an Austrian Centre for Country of Origin and Asylum Research and Documentation (ACCORD) COI Workshop as follows: “The Darood are commonly divided into three major groups referred to as Ogaden, Marehan, and Harti. The Harti are composed of the Majerteen who now are found in Puntland mainly, and the Dulbahante and Warsangeli who mainly live within the borders of Somaliland. Puntland almost entirely overlaps with the Majerteen clan family.14 The Marehan inhabit South-Central Somalia, where they are dominant in Gedo region.” (Austrian Centre for Country of Origin and Asylum Research and Documentation (ACCORD) (15 May 2009) Clans in Somalia - Report on a Lecture by Joakim Gundel, COI Workshop Vienna, p. 12) A document from the Danish Refugee Council/Novib-Oxfam states: “Luuq, which is located in the Southern region of Gedo, shares much of the history of the Raxanweyn and the Geledi Sultanate as their Gasargude Sultanate was closely linked with the Geledi. Here too, you find that nomadic clans have settled and mixed with the sedentary people, however here the nomadic element was primarily represented by the Marehan from the Darood clan family.
[Show full text]
From the Bottom
Conflict Early Warning Early Response Unit From the bottom up: Southern Regions - Perspectives through conflict analysis and key political actors’ mapping of Gedo, Middle Juba, Lower Juba, and Lower Shabelle - SEPTEMBER 2013 With support from Conflict Dynamics International Conflict Early Warning Early Response Unit From the bottom up: Southern Regions - Perspectives through conflict analysis and key political actors’ mapping of Gedo, Middle Juba, Lower Juba, and Lower Shabelle Version 2 Re-Released Deceber 2013 with research finished June 2013 With support from Conflict Dynamics International Support to the project was made possible through generous contributions from the Government of Norway Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Government of Switzerland Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the official position of Conflict Dynamics International or of the Governments of Norway or Switzerland. CONTENTS Abbreviations 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT 8 Conflict Early Warning Early Response Unit (CEWERU) 8 Objectives 8 Conflict Dynamics International (CDI) 8 From the Country Coordinator 9 I. OVERVIEW 10 Social Conflict 10 Cultural Conflict 10 Political Conflict 10 II. INTRODUCTION 11 Key Findings 11 Opportunities 12 III. GEDO 14 Conflict Map: Gedo 14 Clan Chart: Gedo 15 Introduction: Gedo 16 Key Findings: Gedo 16 History of Conflict: Gedo 16 Cross-Border Clan Conflicts 18 Key Political Actors: Gedo 19 Political Actor Mapping: Gedo 20 Clan Analysis: Gedo 21 Capacity of Current Government Administration: Gedo 21 Conflict Mapping and Analysis: Gedo 23 Conflict Profile: Gedo 23 Conflict Timeline: Gedo 25 Peace Initiative: Gedo 26 IV. MIDDLE JUBA 27 Conflict Map: Middle Juba 27 Clan Chart: Middle Juba 28 Introduction: Middle Juba 29 Key Findings: Middle Juba 29 History of Conflict : Middle Juba 29 Key Political Actors: Middle Juba 29 Political Actor Mapping: Middle Juba 30 Capacity of Current Government Administration: Middle Juba 31 Conflict Mapping and Analysis: Middle Juba 31 Conflict Profile: Middle Juba 31 V.
[Show full text]
Lower Juba Sub-National Food Security Cluster Meeting
Lower Juba Sub-National Food Security Cluster Meeting 30th October 2013 & LOCATION SOMALIA Agenda Standing items 1.Introductions 2.Review and agreement of previous minutes 3.Review/follow-up actions from previous meeting 4.Access constraints 5.Presentation of district level information 6.Review of gaps per district and Response Discussion 7.Elections – VC nominations 8.AOB SOMALIA Access Constraints & Implications on Operations To be completed for every meeting SOMALIA Review of FSC Responses for Lower Juba (September 2013) SOMALIA Cluster Members Responses by Response Priority Region Improved Access Livelihood Investment Safety Net Responses No. No. No. No. No. Reached No. Reached Reported Reached Reported Reported Lower Juba 64,500 6 13,878 5 22,500 2 SOMALIA District Level Response i) Improved Access to Food & Safety Nets Region District Emergency Safety Net Relief Responses Assistance Cash (Food/Cash/Vou cher Lower Juba Afmadow 34,500 0 Badhadhe 0 0 Jamaame 0 0 Kismayo 30,000 22,500 SOMALIA District Level Response Improved Access to Food & Safety Nets Activity Breakdown Emergency Relief TB/HIV TB/HIV/Hous Assistance Region District Wet Feeding Hospital ehold TSFP Cash Support Support (Food/Cash/ Voucher Lower Afmadow 34,500 0 0 0 0 Juba Badhadhe 0 0 0 0 0 Jamaame 0 0 0 0 0 Kismayo 30,000 22,500 0 0 0 SOMALIA District Level Response Livelihood Investment Livelihood Region District investment Lower Juba Afmadow 5,898 Badhadhe 1,194 Jamaame 0 Kismayo 6,786 SOMALIA District Level Response ii) Livelihood Investment Activity Breakdown Region District Assets Lower Juba Afmadow 5898 Badhadhe 1,194 Jamaame 0 Kismayo 6,786 SOMALIA Gap Analysis: Improved Access Afmadow and Safety Net Responses Legend L .
[Show full text]
Scramble for the Horn of Africa – Al-Shabaab Vs. Islamic State
DOI: 10.32576/nb.2019.4.3 Nation and Security 2019. Issue 4. | 14–29. Viktor Marsai Scramble for the Horn of Africa – Al-Shabaab vs. Islamic State Over the past three years, the so-called Islamic State (IS) has made significant pro- gress in building an international network of Jihadist groups that pledged allegiance to the organisation. The affiliates of IS are both new-born movements like the Islamic State in Libya, and older groups like Boko Haram in Nigeria. The latter are much more valuable for the ‘Caliphate’ because they have broad experience and capacities that allow them to operate independently of IS. In its global Jihad, therefore, the Islamic State tried to gain the support of the members of former al-Qaeda franchises, shifting their alliances from Ayman al-Zawahiri to Abu Bakr al-Bagdadi. The paper offers an overview of such IS efforts in the Horn of Africa and an evaluation of how successful this quest had been until 2017. Keywords: Somalia, Libya, terrorism, extremism, Africa, Islamic State, al-Shabaab Al-Shabaab in Somalia (full name: Harakat al-Shabaab al-Mujahideen, or ‘Movement of Striving Youth’) is distinct from other Jihadist organisations. Al-Shabaab established and extended territorial control in Somalia over at least 250,000 square kilometres in 2008–2009 – five years prior to IS.1 It created effective administrative and judiciary systems and launched military, political and ideological attacks against the Transitional Federal Government of Somalia and its foreign supporters. In 2011–2012, offensives of the African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) and the Somali National Army (SNA) inflicted serious setbacks on the movement, and it had to vacate the capital, Mogadishu.
[Show full text]
Transition Initiatives for Stabilization Plus (Tis+) Program Year Three – Annual Work Plan
TRANSITION INITIATIVES FOR STABILIZATION PLUS (TIS+) PROGRAM YEAR THREE – ANNUAL WORK PLAN (OCTOBER 1, 2017 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2018) Revised November 2017 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by AECOM. Annual Work plan | Transition Initiatives for Stabilization Plus (TIS+) Program i TRANSITION INITIATIVES FOR STABILIZATION PLUS (TIS+) PROGRAM YEAR THREE – ANNUAL WORK PLAN (OCTOBER 1, 2017 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2018) Contract No: AID-623-C-15-00001 Submitted to: USAID | Somalia Prepared by: AECOM International Development DISCLAIMER: The authors’ views expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Year Three - Annual Work Plan | Transition Initiatives for Stabilization Plus (TIS+) Program i TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................ ii Acronym List .............................................................................................................................................. iii Stabilization Context .................................................................................................................................. 5 Goals and Objectives of USAID and TIS+ ............................................................................................... 6 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
The Somali Shelter / NFI Cluster
The Somali Shelter / NFI Cluster Reviews of coordination and response Combined report April 2015 Disclaimer The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR. Responsibility for the opinions expressed in this report rests solely with the authors. Publication of this document does not imply endorsement by UNHCR of the opinions expressed. Somalia Shelter / NFI Cluster 2015 2 Contents Abbreviations and acronyms 4 Acknowledgements 5 Executive summary 6 Recommendations 10 1 Introduction 1.1 Evaluation purpose, scope and clients 13 2 Methodology 2.1 Evaluation methodology 14 2.2 Constraints 15 3 Background and context 3.1 Context of the humanitarian response in Somalia 17 3.2 Shelter Cluster deployment 21 4 Findings 4.1 Leadership 23 4.2 Cluster personnel 24 4.3 Supporting shelter service delivery 26 Case study: The electronic cluster (1) 32 4.4 Informing strategic decision-making for the humanitarian response and cluster strategy and planning 34 Case study: Emergency Shelter, Mogadishu (short version) 35 Case study: Transitional shelter, Bosaso (short version) 40 Case study: Permanent Shelter, Galkayo (short version) 42 Case study: The electronic cluster (2) 45 4.5 Monitoring and reporting on implementation of Shelter 49 4.6 Advocacy 50 4.7 Accountability to affected persons 51 4.8 Contingency planning, preparedness and capacity-building 52 5 Conclusions 54 Annex 1 Timeline 56 Annex 2 Natural disasters in Somalia 2006-2014 58 Annex 3 Informants (coordination review) 61 Annex 4 Bibliography 63 Annex
[Show full text]
S 2019 858 E.Pdf
United Nations S/2019/858* Security Council Distr.: General 1 November 2019 Original: English Letter dated 1 November 2019 from the Chair of the Security Council Committee pursuant to resolution 751 (1992) concerning Somalia addressed to the President of the Security Council On behalf of the Security Council Committee pursuant to resolution 751 (1992) concerning Somalia, and in accordance with paragraph 54 of Security Council resolution 2444 (2018), I have the honour to transmit herewith the final report of the Panel of Experts on Somalia. In this connection, the Committee would appreciate it if the present letter and the report were brought to the attention of the members of the Security Council and issued as a document of the Council. (Signed) Marc Pecsteen de Buytswerve Chair Security Council Committee pursuant to resolution 751 (1992) concerning Somalia * Reissued for technical reasons on 14 November 2019. 19-16960* (E) 141119 *1916960* S/2019/858 Letter dated 27 September 2019 from the Panel of Experts on Somalia addressed to the Chair of the Security Council Committee pursuant to resolution 751 (1992) concerning Somalia In accordance with paragraph 54 of Security Council resolution 2444 (2018), we have the honour to transmit herewith the final report of the Panel of Experts on Somalia. (Signed) Jay Bahadur Coordinator Panel of Experts on Somalia (Signed) Mohamed Abdelsalam Babiker Humanitarian expert (Signed) Nazanine Moshiri Armed groups expert (Signed) Brian O’Sullivan Armed groups/natural resources expert (Signed) Matthew Rosbottom Finance expert (Signed) Richard Zabot Arms expert 2/161 19-16960 S/2019/858 Summary During the first reporting period of the Panel of Experts on Somalia, the use by Al-Shabaab of improvised explosive devices reached its greatest extent in Somali history, with a year-on-year increase of approximately one third.
[Show full text]
Somalia Country Report
SOMALIA COUNTRY REPORT October 2004 Country Information and Policy Unit IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY DIRECTORATE HOME OFFICE, UNITED KINGDOM Somalia October 2004 CONTENTS 1. Scope of Document 1.1 - 1.10 2. Geography 2.1 - 2.3 3. Economy 3.1 - 3.4 4. History Collapse of central government and civil war 1990 - 1992 4.1 - 4.6 UN intervention 1992 - 1995 4.7 - 4.11 Resurgence of militia rivalry 1995 - 2000 4.12 - 4.15 Peace initiatives 2000 - 2004 - Arta Peace Conference and the formation of the TNG, 2000 4.16 - 4.19 - Somalia National Reconciliation Conference, 2002 - 2004 4.20 - 4.25 'South West State of Somalia' (Bay and Bakool) 2002 - 2003 4.26 - 4.27 'Puntland' Regional Administration 1998 - 2003 4.28 - 4.30 The 'Republic of Somaliland' 1991 - 2003 4.31 - 4.33 5. State Structures The Constitution 5.1 Transitional National Government (TNG) Charter 5.2 'Puntland State of Somalia' Charter 5.3 'Republic of Somaliland' Constitution 5.4 Political System General 5.5 - 5.8 - Mogadishu 5.9 - 5.10 Other areas in central and southern Somalia 5.11 - Lower and Middle Juba (including Kismayo) 5.12 - Lower and Middle Shabelle 5.13 - 5.14 - Hiran 5.15 - 5.16 - Galgudud 5.17 - Gedo 5.18 'South West State of Somalia' (Bay and Bakool) 5.19 - 5.20 Puntland 5.21 - 5.22 Somaliland 5.23 Judiciary 5.24 - 5.26 Southern Somalia 5.27 - 5.28 Puntland 5.29 Somaliland 5.30 Legal Rights/Detention 5.31 - 5.32 Death Penalty 5.33 Internal Security 5.34 Armed forces 5.35 - 5.36 Police 5.37 - 5.38 Clan-based militias 5.39 Prisons and prison conditions 5.40 - 5.43 Military Service 5.44 Conscientious objectors and deserters 5.45 Recruitment by clan militias 5.46 Demobilisation initiatives 5.47 - 5.48 Medical Services Overview 5.49 - 5.50 Hospitals 5.51 - 5.52 Private sector and NGO provision 5.53 - 5.55 HIV/AIDS 5.56 - 5.57 People with disabilities 5.58 Mental health care 5.59 Educational System 5.60 - 5.65 Somalia October 2004 6.
[Show full text]
Somalia and Eritrea Addressed to the President of the Security Council
United Nations S/2013/413 Security Council Distr.: General 12 July 2013 Original: English Letter dated 12 July 2013 from the Chair of the Security Council Committee pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia and Eritrea addressed to the President of the Security Council On behalf of the Security Council Committee pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia and Eritrea, and in accordance with paragraph 13 (m) of Security Council resolution 2060 (2012), I have the honour to transmit herewith the report on Somalia of the Monitoring Group on Somalia and Eritrea. In this connection, the Committee would appreciate it if the present letter, together with its enclosure, were brought to the attention of the members of the Security Council and issued as a document of the Council. (Signed) Kim Sook Chairman Security Council Committee pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia and Eritrea 13-36185 (E) 150713 *1336185* S/2013/413 Letter dated 19 June 2013 from the members of the Monitoring Group on Somalia and Eritrea addressed to the Chair of the Security Council Committee pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia and Eritrea We have the honour to transmit herewith the report on Somalia of the Monitoring Group on Somalia and Eritrea, in accordance with paragraph 13 (m) of Security Council resolution 2060 (2012). (Signed) Jarat Chopra Coordinator Monitoring Group on Somalia and Eritrea (Signed) Jeanine Lee Brudenell Finance Expert (Signed) Emmanuel Deisser Arms Expert (Signed) Aurélien Llorca Transport Expert (Signed) Dinesh Mahtani Finance Expert (Signed) Jörg Roofthooft Maritime Expert (Signed) Babatunde Taiwo Armed Groups Expert (Signed) Kristèle Younès Humanitarian Expert 2 13-36185 S/2013/413 Report of the Monitoring Group on Somalia and Eritrea pursuant to Security Council resolution 2060 (2012): Somalia Contents Page Abbreviations.................................................................
[Show full text]
Rebuilding Resilient and Sustainable Agriculture in Somalia Public Disclosure Authorized Photo Credits: Cover & Inside ©FAO Somalia
SOMALIA COUNTRY ECONOMIC MEMORANDUM Volume I Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Rebuilding Resilient and Sustainable Agriculture in Somalia Public Disclosure Authorized Photo credits: Cover & Inside ©FAO Somalia SOMALIA: Rebuilding Resilient and Sustainable Agriculture Copyright © 2018 by International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations ISBN 978-92-5-130419-8 (FAO) © FAO, 2018 Disclaimer: The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments and members represented by either institution. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.
[Show full text]