Rappor Bilancio Sociale Report and Social Balance
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Printed in May 2017 May in Printed ENAC Report and SocialBalance Report : Centro Studi Cassia srl Cassia Studi Centro : Translation Gemmagraf 2007 srl 2007 Gemmagraf Graphic design and printing: and design Graphic Italian Civil Aviation Authority Italian CivilAviation Rapporto e PRESIDENZA E DIREZIONE GENERALE Viale Castro Pretorio, 118 • 00185 Roma tel. +39 06 44596-1 PEC: [email protected] Bilancio www.enac.gov.it for their collaboration their for PRESIDENTE We would like to thank all ENAC’s Depts. Depts. ENAC’s all thank to like would We Vito Riggio Acknowledgements Sociale CONSIGLIO DI AMMINISTRAZIONE Deputy Director General Director Deputy 2016 Angela Stefania Bergantino Alessandro Cardi Alessandro Manlio Mele Supervision Alfredo Pallone ITALIAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AVIATION CIVIL ITALIAN 2016 Luisa Riccardi Head of Media Relations Unit Relations Media of Head Loredana Rosati Loredana COLLEGIO DEI REVISORI DEI CONTI Institutional Communication Unit Communication Institutional Letteria Dinaro (Presidente) Francesca Miceli Francesca Carmelo Caruso With the collaboration of collaboration the With Sergio Zanetti Head of Institutional Communication Unit Communication Institutional of Head ENAC Maria Pastore Maria DIRETTORE GENERALE Editorial coordination Editorial Alessio Quaranta Alessio Quaranta Alessio Coordinamento editoriale DIRECTOR GENERAL DIRECTOR ENAC Maria Pastore Responsabile Funzione Organizzativa Sergio Zanetti Sergio Comunicazione Istituzionale Carmelo Caruso Carmelo Con la collaborazione di Letteria Dinaro (President) Dinaro Letteria Francesca Miceli ACCOUNT ADVISORY BOARD ADVISORY ACCOUNT 2016 Funzione Organizzativa AUTORITÀ PER L’AVIAZIONE CIVILE Comunicazione Istituzionale Luisa Riccardi Luisa Loredana Rosati Alfredo Pallone Alfredo 2016 Responsabile Funzione Organizzativa Manlio Mele Manlio Balance Contatti con la Stampa Angela Stefania Bergantino Stefania Angela BOARD Supervisione a cura di Alessandro Cardi Vito Riggio Riggio Vito Vice Direttore Generale Social PRESIDENT Si ringraziano tutte le Strutture dell’ENAC www.enac.gov.it www.enac.gov.it per i contributi informativi. ph. +39 06 44596-1 06 +39 ph. Viale Castro Pretorio, 118 • 00185 Rome Rome 00185 • 118 Pretorio, Castro Viale Report and Report HEADQUARTERS Autorità per l’Aviazione Civile per l’Aviazione Autorità Progetto grafico e stampa: Gemmagraf 2007 srl Traduzione: Centro Studi Cassia srl ENAC Rapporto e Bilancio Sociale Finito di stampare nel mese di maggio 2017 Printed in May 2017 May in Printed ENAC Report and SocialBalance Report : Centro Studi Cassia srl Cassia Studi Centro : Translation Gemmagraf 2007 srl 2007 Gemmagraf Graphic design and printing: and design Graphic Italian Civil Aviation Authority Italian CivilAviation Rapporto e PRESIDENZA E DIREZIONE GENERALE Viale Castro Pretorio, 118 • 00185 Roma tel. +39 06 44596-1 PEC: [email protected] Bilancio www.enac.gov.it for their collaboration their for PRESIDENTE We would like to thank all ENAC’s Depts. Depts. ENAC’s all thank to like would We Vito Riggio Acknowledgements Sociale CONSIGLIO DI AMMINISTRAZIONE Deputy Director General Director Deputy 2016 Angela Stefania Bergantino Alessandro Cardi Alessandro Manlio Mele Supervision Alfredo Pallone ITALIAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AVIATION CIVIL ITALIAN 2016 Luisa Riccardi Head of Media Relations Unit Relations Media of Head Loredana Rosati Loredana COLLEGIO DEI REVISORI DEI CONTI Institutional Communication Unit Communication Institutional Letteria Dinaro (Presidente) Francesca Miceli Francesca Carmelo Caruso With the collaboration of collaboration the With Sergio Zanetti Head of Institutional Communication Unit Communication Institutional of Head ENAC Maria Pastore Maria DIRETTORE GENERALE Editorial coordination Editorial Alessio Quaranta Alessio Quaranta Alessio Coordinamento editoriale DIRECTOR GENERAL DIRECTOR ENAC Maria Pastore Responsabile Funzione Organizzativa Sergio Zanetti Sergio Comunicazione Istituzionale Carmelo Caruso Carmelo Con la collaborazione di Letteria Dinaro (President) Dinaro Letteria Francesca Miceli ACCOUNT ADVISORY BOARD ADVISORY ACCOUNT 2016 Funzione Organizzativa AUTORITÀ PER L’AVIAZIONE CIVILE Comunicazione Istituzionale Luisa Riccardi Luisa Loredana Rosati Alfredo Pallone Alfredo 2016 Responsabile Funzione Organizzativa Manlio Mele Manlio Balance Contatti con la Stampa Angela Stefania Bergantino Stefania Angela BOARD Supervisione a cura di Alessandro Cardi Vito Riggio Riggio Vito Vice Direttore Generale Social PRESIDENT Si ringraziano tutte le Strutture dell’ENAC www.enac.gov.it www.enac.gov.it per i contributi informativi. ph. +39 06 44596-1 06 +39 ph. Viale Castro Pretorio, 118 • 00185 Rome Rome 00185 • 118 Pretorio, Castro Viale Report and Report HEADQUARTERS Autorità per l’Aviazione Civile per l’Aviazione Autorità Progetto grafico e stampa: Gemmagraf 2007 srl Traduzione: Centro Studi Cassia srl ENAC Rapporto e Bilancio Sociale Finito di stampare nel mese di maggio 2017 2016 ENAC Italian Civil Aviation Authority Report and Social Balance Vito Riggio PRESIDENT ITALIAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY Alessio Quaranta DIRECTOR GENERAL ITALIAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY Alessandro Cardi DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL ITALIAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY Fang Liu ICAO’s seCRETARY GENERAL CONTRIBUTIONS CONTRIBUTIONS Vito Riggio PRESIDENT ITALIAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY SYSTEMS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AIR TRANSPORT raffic trends are one of the indicators of the economic development of a country or a regional area. In 2016, passenger traffic in Europe grew by 6.7% compared to an average growth of around 5% of the Tlast 3 years. In Italy, growth in the year 2016 was of + 4.8%, for a total of 164 million passengers at Italian airports. This data, compared to the modest increase in the national GDP, shows the strong international characterization of this industry, its economic importance and the health status of the economies it serves. In this sense, we have to recognize the changes that are affecting the industrial sector and study the articulation of services offered by air carriers. Given that the business model introduced by low-cost airlines was a success across Europe, it appears odd that the percentage of traffic operated by these carriers is significantly higher in Italy compared to the rest of Europe, about 50% versus an average of 32% in the rest of Europe. Another aspect that appears frequently, is the reduction in the share of traffic served by national operators, who sell-out large market shares of traffic to European and non-European operators, likely to use more efficient business models. This trend clearly shows that national carriers are experiencing difficulties in operating in a competitive and liberalized market, such as the aviation sector. At a first analysis, the competitive gap does not appear to be related to the size of the airlines. In recent years bankruptcy proceedings have struck small and medium-sized companies, but also Italy’s main national airline, Alitalia, that is undergoing a profound crisis and recently even entered in compulsory extraordinary administration. In view of the above, a thorough study would be required on the causes and conditions that the country offers to entrepreneurs, to understand whether and to what extent interventions have actually taken place to support the development or if there is room for policies aimed at making industrial costs sustainable for air carriers. Despite all of this, in recent years, and in particular in 2016, the migration of air carriers and aircrafts to other EU countries has intensified, probably to countries where they will receive greater attention, better services, possibly also the certification and surveillance services provided by civil aviation authorities. This phenomenon, that is now taking hold, must be subject to a profound reflection, as it adversely affects the capacity of the national system to promote quality development and jobs. It also leaks out skills and competences at a rate that in the short term would be unsustainable for the country, the civil aviation system and ENAC. On the other hand, as far as infrastructures are concerned, in 2016, the demand for continental and intercontinental routes increased and the capacity offered by the airport system was able to handle it very well, especially the larger airports that invested heavily to increase the quantity and, above all, the quality of the services offered. To this end the following two measures were very important: the use of the so-called derogating Planning Agreements and the commitments made by ENAC to work at ensuring that investment plans be coherent with the National Plan for Airports adopted by the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport. ENAC REPORT AND SOCIAL BALANCE 2016 3 CONTRIBUTIONS The Italian civil aviation system received important results also on the international front. In ICAO, Italy received a considerable appreciation in the Council’s elections, and was awarded important commissions. In the co-operation with other countries to which Italy offered support and institutional assistance, ENAC launched a joint project of which Italy is very proud: the twinning project with Egypt aimed at aligning its legal, institutional and organizational system and developing the skills and competences of Egyptian Civil Aviation staff. It is well-known that given the growing complexity of the civil aviation regulatory system at both ICAO and EU level, it is rather common for many countries to seek support and assistance from the civil aviation authorities