The Tragicall Historye of the Saintly and Devouted Thomas Á Beckett and His Quarrelsome Dispute with the Ruthless and Impetuous Henry Plantagenet, Kynge of England

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Tragicall Historye of the Saintly and Devouted Thomas Á Beckett and His Quarrelsome Dispute with the Ruthless and Impetuous Henry Plantagenet, Kynge of England THE TRAGICALL HISTORYE OF THE SAINTLY AND DEVOUTED THOMAS Á BECKETT AND HIS QUARRELSOME DISPUTE WITH THE RUTHLESS AND IMPETUOUS HENRY PLANTAGENET, KYNGE OF ENGLAND SLIDE 1 Thomas Becket was a clever Londoner dedicated to the wine trade, a prosperous business at that time. Thomas was sociable and knew everybody in town and at court. Henry II, King of England, Duke of Normandy, Duke of Aquitaine, Count of Anjou, and Lord of Ireland took notice of him. SLIDE 2 Henry II was a man with boundless energy that could never be sitting down for more than two seconds. He passed laws, and laws, and laws, and more laws, and then he indulged himself in continuous amorous adventures because his mercurial wife, the beautiful Eleanor of Aquitaine and him, did not have a good relationship. Thomas joined Henry II in a constant parade all through the Kingdom. And wherever they went, falcons, falconers, dogs, horses, knights, beaters, warriors, cooks, ladies, hunters, musicians, dancers, acrobats, and minstrels followed them. Being close to Henry II was a ticket to la dolce vita. However everything wasn't a bed of roses for these two partners in crime Henry and Thomas, and although Henry II was a cheerful and friendly man, he had one defect: he would never accept being second best to anyone. So on occasions, Becket had to let the King beat him at cards, at horsemanship, at hunting, at dice, and in amorous conquests. 1 SLIDE 3 Only one person would be a match for Henry II, and that was Philip Augustus, the homicidically brave King of France. Pour le roi! La liberteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeè!!! To teach him a lesson, Henry determined to do what his ancestors had wanted to do for many years: to invade France. But Henry had another problem. If he wanted to attack Philip Augustus, he needed soldiers and money. So he sought the help of the Holy Church so they could give him some money for the glorious enterprise. The Church thought that was their chance to bringing the proud King down a peg or two. Ha-ha-ha... the power! Your Majesty, if you want money from the Church of England, you will have to admit, publicly, that you're the first man of England, only after God. After God!... And the angels. And the saints. And the Pope. And the Archbishop. And the archdeacons. And the priests. Too many "ands" for Henry II. He didn't feel in the mood of submitting himself to a bunch of priests, especially when such gallant prospects awaited him in France, so he thought: "What about if I appoint my friend Thomas á Becket as Archbishop of Canterbury? This way I can command, do, undo, commission, appoint and disappoint in the way that best pleases me. I'm sure my dear friend Thomas would accept what I say out of gratitude. After all, without my influence, he would be a nobody, counting cartons in his silly meaningless pointless fruitless senseless useless wine shop in London." 2 SLIDE 4 So Thomas á Becket came to be the first authority of England in... spiritual matters. Only the Pope was his boss... in theory. But far from contenting himself with being Henry's puppet, Thomas suddenly realized something: He wanted to serve God. After a life of fun and games and all sorts of debauchery, he felt something completely new to him: compassion for human beings. Therefore, he started a fairly competent program to favour the Church's prerogatives and, by the way, give a hand to the poor people that walked through the streets, and all those wretched commons that came to ask for assistance from the Holy Church. After all, the wine- seller knew about accounts better than anyone! And because he knew people started feeling a bit more optimistic, he thought he would remain by their side and protect them, if necessary, with his life. SLIDE 5 Now Henry thought that, having Becket as his right-hand man, he would generously hand over the money for the war with France. So in the best of moods, Henry approached Thomas: - Thomas. Thomas. Thomas! Tom? Tommy?... My Lord Archbishop?? - Yes, my son? - Son? Ehm... er... Ah, OK, we have to play the game, alright. I like that, Thomas! Ehem ehem... Please... Can I have... some money... yeah... so I can invade France?... Could I... please? - Money? My son, what about your soul? Is your soul clear? - My soul? My soul is... perfectly clear. And so is my bank account. Will you give me the money, please??? (big smile) - Mmm. Let me think about it... Mmmm... No! 3 Henry couldn't be believe his ears. He expected all kinds of treachery from his wife and sons Richard and John, but Thomas! His dear beloved friend Thomas! So at that point he started to suck his thumb, calling for his mum. Nevertheless, he wasn't going to allow Thomas to overshadow him. Henry asked nicely, politely, seductively, and when Becket said no once again, once again did Henry use his charm for persuasion: "Traitor to the Crown, to the State, to the Holy Church of Jesus Christ, to the Holy Pope, and to all that is sacred on the Earth!" But Becket felt not intimidated by Henry's insults and carried on being a bigger pain than France had ever been. Because he excommunicated all the members of the Church and the court who supported Henry's illegal and arbitrary actions. These people made a bad use of their power, and the courageous Becket delivered excommunications like they were peanuts. After a bit of quarrelling they made a truce. To add up to Henry's humiliation, the King of France mediated between Henry and Thomas: - My dear friend Thomas á Becket, Lord Archishop of Canterbury, and my dear dear dear beloved friend Henry II, King of England and Lord of Ireland. - And Count of Anjoy! And Duke of Acquaitine! - Yeah, I've heard something of that. It would be a great pleasure for the French Crown that you and the Archbishop were friends, for the welfare and the well-being of your little pretty island. , and they embraced each other as friends again. After this, it was expected that Becket would retire his excommunications, but he didn't do it. Whoever offended God needed to respond to God only. And this is when Henry II finally exploited: 'I'm surrounded by cowards. Will no one rid me of this troublesome priest?' 4 SLIDE 6 And here can you see the four riders: Reginald FitzUrse, Hugh de Morville, William de Tracy, and Richard le Breton, all of them wanted in seven or eight counties, that went to Canterbury Cathedral, where Becket was at pray. The Knights burst into the Church violently, and found Becket kneeling down before God's image. In spite of everyone's protest for having invaded the sacred space, the four knights tried to arrest Becket. The archbishop resisted corageously but the knights were well prepared, so in the end, Thomas surrendered as he said: "For the name of Jesus and the protection of the Church, I am ready to embrace Death!". So it was that Thomas á Becket was assassinated by the four unfortunate ones, who opened his skull with their swords and brought him down mercilessly. SLIDE 7 Henry II had no idea that the four knights would go as far as that, but the word was spread that he had given the order for the killing. Consequently, on the 26th of May 1171, Henry II, King of England, Duke of Aquitaine, Count of Anjou, and Lord of Ireland, was flogged by 80 bishops as a public penance for the assassination of the Archbishop St. Thomas á Becket. After this day, all sorts of miracles started taking place around the holy town of Canterbury, and pilgrims from all the Kingdom of England went to worship the saint. Thomas Becket's shrine remained within the Cathedral of Canterbury, until a few centuries later, the Henry VIII destroyed the martyr's monument. There is one thing people were never sure about. Did Henry really ask the four knights to assassinate Becket? Was he completely innocent of that? We will never know. 5 .
Recommended publications
  • Here It Became Obvious That Hollacombe Crediton and Not Hollacombe Winkleigh Was Implied and Quite a Different Proposition
    INTRODUCTION In 1876 Charles Worthy wrote “The History of the Manor and Church of Winkleigh”, the first and only book on Winkleigh to be published. Although this valuable little handbook contains many items of interest, not all of which fall within the range of its title, it is not a complete history and consequently fails to meet the requirements of the Devonshire Association. More than a dozen years ago a friend remarked to me that the monks of Crediton at one time used to walk to Hollacombe in order to preach at the ancient chapel of Hollacombe Barton. I was so surprised by this seemingly long trek that I made enquiries of the Devonshire Association. I was referred to the Tower Library of Crediton Church where it became obvious that Hollacombe Crediton and not Hollacombe Winkleigh was implied and quite a different proposition. Meantime the Honorary General Editor of the Parochial Section (Hugh R. Watkins Esq.) suggested that I should write a history of Winkleigh. The undertaking was accepted although it was clear that my only qualification for the task was a deep regard for the associations of the parish combined with a particularly intense love for the hamlet of Hollacombe. The result of this labour of love, produced in scanty spare time, and spread over the intervening years should be considered with these points in view. The proof of this present pudding will be measured by the ease with which the less immediately interesting parts can be assimilated by the general reader. Due care has been taken to verify all the subject matter.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reign of King Henry II of England, 1170-74: Three Minor Revisions
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1-1-2001 The reign of King Henry II of England, 1170-74: Three minor revisions John Donald Hosler Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Recommended Citation Hosler, John Donald, "The reign of King Henry II of England, 1170-74: Three minor revisions" (2001). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 21277. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/21277 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The reign of King Henry II of England, 1170-74: Three minor revisions by John Donald Hosler A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Major: History Major Professor: Kenneth G. Madison Iowa State University Ames~Iowa 2001 11 Graduate College Iowa State University This is to certify that the Master's thesis of John Donald Hosler has met the thesis requirements of Iowa State University Signatures have been redacted for privacy 111 The liberal arts had not disappeared, but the honours which ought to attend them were withheld Gerald ofWales, Topograhpia Cambria! (c.1187) IV TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE. INTRODUCTION 1 Overview: the Reign of Henry II of England 1 Henry's Conflict with Thomas Becket CHAPTER TWO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Blackmore Country (1906)
    I II i II I THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES IN THE SAME SERIES PRICE 6/- EACH THE SCOTT COUNTRY THE BURNS COUNTRY BY W. S. CROCKETT BY C. S. DOOGALL Minister of Twccdsmuir THE THE THACKERAY COUNTRY CANTERBURY PILGRIMAGES BY LEWIS MELVILLE BY II. SNOWDEN WARD THE INQOLDSBY COUNTRY THE HARDY COUNTRY BY CHAS. G. HAKI'ER BY CHAS. G. HARPER PUBLISHED BY ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE, LONDON Zbc pWQVimnQC Series CO THE BLACKMORE COUNTRY s^- Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2007 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/blackmorecountryOOsneliala ON THE LYN, BELOW BRENDON. THE BLACKMORE COUNTRY BY F. J. SNELL AUTHOR OF 'A BOOK OF exmoob"; " kably associations of archbishop temple," etc. EDITOR of " UEMORIALS OF OLD DEVONSHIRE " WITH FIFTY FULL -PAGE ILLUSTRATIONS FROM PHOTOGRAPHS BY C. W. BARNES WARD LONDON ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK 1906 " So holy and so perfect is my love, That I shall think it a most plenteous crop To glean the broken ears after the man That the main harvest reaps." —Sir Phiup SroNEY. CORRIGENDA Page 22, line 20, for " immorality " read " morality." „ 128, „ 2 1, /or "John" r^a^/" Jan." „ 131, „ 21, /<7r "check" r?a^ "cheque." ; PROLOGUE The " Blackmore Country " is an expression requiring some amount of definition, as it clearly will not do to make it embrace the whole of the territory which he annexed, from time to time, in his various works of fiction, nor even every part of Devon in which he has laid the scenes of a romance.
    [Show full text]
  • Black's Guide to Devonshire
    $PI|c>y » ^ EXETt R : STOI Lundrvl.^ I y. fCamelford x Ho Town 24j Tfe<n i/ lisbeard-- 9 5 =553 v 'Suuiland,ntjuUffl " < t,,, w;, #j A~ 15 g -- - •$3*^:y&« . Pui l,i<fkl-W>«? uoi- "'"/;< errtland I . V. ',,, {BabburomheBay 109 f ^Torquaylll • 4 TorBa,, x L > \ * Vj I N DEX MAP TO ACCOMPANY BLACKS GriDE T'i c Q V\ kk&et, ii £FC Sote . 77f/? numbers after the names refer to the page in GuidcBook where die- description is to be found.. Hack Edinburgh. BEQUEST OF REV. CANON SCADDING. D. D. TORONTO. 1901. BLACK'S GUIDE TO DEVONSHIRE. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from University of Toronto http://www.archive.org/details/blacksguidetodevOOedin *&,* BLACK'S GUIDE TO DEVONSHIRE TENTH EDITION miti) fffaps an* Hlustrations ^ . P, EDINBURGH ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK 1879 CLUE INDEX TO THE CHIEF PLACES IN DEVONSHIRE. For General Index see Page 285. Axniinster, 160. Hfracombe, 152. Babbicombe, 109. Kent Hole, 113. Barnstaple, 209. Kingswear, 119. Berry Pomeroy, 269. Lydford, 226. Bideford, 147. Lynmouth, 155. Bridge-water, 277. Lynton, 156. Brixham, 115. Moreton Hampstead, 250. Buckfastleigh, 263. Xewton Abbot, 270. Bude Haven, 223. Okehampton, 203. Budleigh-Salterton, 170. Paignton, 114. Chudleigh, 268. Plymouth, 121. Cock's Tor, 248. Plympton, 143. Dartmoor, 242. Saltash, 142. Dartmouth, 117. Sidmouth, 99. Dart River, 116. Tamar, River, 273. ' Dawlish, 106. Taunton, 277. Devonport, 133. Tavistock, 230. Eddystone Lighthouse, 138. Tavy, 238. Exe, The, 190. Teignmouth, 107. Exeter, 173. Tiverton, 195. Exmoor Forest, 159. Torquay, 111. Exmouth, 101. Totnes, 260. Harewood House, 233. Ugbrooke, 10P.
    [Show full text]
  • Colleague, Critic, and Sometime Counselor to Thomas Becket
    JOHN OF SALISBURY: COLLEAGUE, CRITIC, AND SOMETIME COUNSELOR TO THOMAS BECKET By L. Susan Carter A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of History–Doctor of Philosophy 2021 ABSTRACT JOHN OF SALISBURY: COLLEAGUE, CRITIC, AND SOMETIME COUNSELOR TO THOMAS BECKET By L. Susan Carter John of Salisbury was one of the best educated men in the mid-twelfth century. The beneficiary of twelve years of study in Paris under the tutelage of Peter Abelard and other scholars, John flourished alongside Thomas Becket in the Canterbury curia of Archbishop Theobald. There, his skills as a writer were of great value. Having lived through the Anarchy of King Stephen, he was a fierce advocate for the liberty of the English Church. Not surprisingly, John became caught up in the controversy between King Henry II and Thomas Becket, Henry’s former chancellor and successor to Theobald as archbishop of Canterbury. Prior to their shared time in exile, from 1164-1170, John had written three treatises with concern for royal court follies, royal pressures on the Church, and the danger of tyrants at the core of the Entheticus de dogmate philosophorum , the Metalogicon , and the Policraticus. John dedicated these works to Becket. The question emerges: how effective was John through dedicated treatises and his letters to Becket in guiding Becket’s attitudes and behavior regarding Church liberty? By means of contemporary communication theory an examination of John’s writings and letters directed to Becket creates a new vista on the relationship between John and Becket—and the impact of John on this martyred archbishop.
    [Show full text]
  • Background: What Was the Church and Why Was It Important?
    Background: What was the Church and why was it important? To fully understand the issues at stake in this topic, we need firstly to work out what the Church was and why it was so important during this time period. What is the Church? When I use the word ‘Church’ it generally means everybody working for the Church, from the Pope at its head, down to Archbishop, Bishops, the priests and clerks. It also includes all of the buildings and land attached to Christianity and the money that comes in from those lands. When we refer to ‘The Church’ it means the whole institution, not just a physical building, i.e. the village church. Why was the Church so important? In medieval England, the Church dominated everybody's life. All Medieval people - be they village peasants, barons, knights, kings or towns people - believed that God, Heaven and Hell existed The control the Church had over the people was total. For example, peasants worked for free on church land for a certain number of days a year and had to give 10% of their earnings to the Church (this payment was called a Tithe) The Church was very wealthy and owned lots of land, some reasons are: - If you died you had to pay to be buried on Church lands - If you were born you had to give a donation in order to be baptised - You could buy ‘Indulgences’ to guarantee you would go to heaven. Interestingly, when Henry VIII dissolved the monasteries (buildings where monks lived) in the 1500’s he received 25% of total land in England.
    [Show full text]
  • Our January Parishscapes Newsletter
    Doccombe Parishscapes Newsletter January 2017 Welcome to our January Parishscapes Newsletter We wish everyone a wonderful new year ahead and our Parishscapes project is set to accelerate in 2017 with a lot planned. In this newsletter we thought we would give you some background history to the story of Thomas Becket so hope you find this interesting and informative. In the meantime our main work has been to continue transcribing and translating the manorial records of Doccombe manor. One group has been working their way through the manorial courts of the reign of Henry VIIth where some interesting references to Charcoal pits in the woods and tin-mining have emerged. The other group have looked at a number of C17th leases of tenancies, but also of the whole manor and the woods. They are following this with some interesting biographical work on the men who leased the manor. We also have some stimulating talks and events coming up. We'll keep you posted as we schedule them - look out for a fascinating evening with Professor Nicholas Vincent below. For more up-to-date information and our blog go to http://www.doccombeparishscapes.co.uk/ Project Lead Bill Hardiman / Project Manager-Administration Katheryn Hope The Story of Thomas Becket Thomas Becket’s death remains one of the most famous stories associated with Medieval England. Becket was a 12th century chancellor and archbishop of Canterbury whose murder resulted in his canonisation. Thomas Becket was born in 1118, the son of a prosperous London merchant. He was well educated first at Merton priory, then in a City of London school, and finally in Paris.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Translation of the Life of Saint Thomas, the Archbishop of Canterbury by William, a Monk of Canterbury
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1946 An Annotated Translation of the Life of Saint Thomas, the Archbishop of Canterbury By William, a Monk of Canterbury Mary Annette Bocke Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the Classical Literature and Philology Commons Recommended Citation Bocke, Mary Annette, "An Annotated Translation of the Life of Saint Thomas, the Archbishop of Canterbury By William, a Monk of Canterbury" (1946). Master's Theses. 57. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/57 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1946 Mary Annette Bocke AN ANNOTATED TRANSLATIOli OF THE LIFE OF SAINT THOMAS, mE ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY BY WILLIAM, A MONK OF CANTERBURY BY SISTER MARY ANNETTE BOCKE, O. P. A 1HESIS SUBMITTED IN PJ.RTUL FULFILLMEJ.ITT OF mE REQUIREMDTTS FOR mE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS m LOYOLA UNIVERSITY FEBRUARY 194:6 Vita Sister Mary Annette Boeke, o. P., was born in Quincy, Illinois, March 25, 1915. She was graduated from Notre Dame Academy, Quincy, Illinois, June, 1933, and attended Quincy College from 1933 to 1934. The Bachelor of Arts degree with a major in Latin was conferred by Loyola University, June, 1939. From 1940 to 1946 the wri tar has been engaged in teaching Latin and French at Routt College High School, Jacksonville, Illinois.
    [Show full text]
  • Haynes Barn Saltwood
    Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment in Advance of the Proposed Development of Land at Hayne Barn, Saltwood, Hythe, Kent. National Grid Reference TR 615591 136707 Report for Ivor Record Date of Report: 3rd August 2018 SWAT ARCHAEOLOGY Swale and Thames Archaeological Survey Company School Farm Oast, Graveney Road Faversham, Kent ME13 8UP Tel; 01795 532548 or 07885 700 112 www.swatarchaeology.co.uk Development of Land at Hayne Barn, Saltwood, Hythe, Kent Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Project Background ......................................................................................... 6 1.2 The Site ............................................................................................................ 6 1.3 The Proposed Development ............................................................................ 7 1.4 Project Constraints .......................................................................................... 8 1.5 Scope of Document ......................................................................................... 8 2 PLANNING BACKGROUND .................................................................................................. 8 2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Heritage Assets ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • What Was the Church and Why Was It Important?
    Background: What was the Church and why was it important? To fully understand the issues at stake in this topic, we need firstly to work out what the Church was and why it was so important during this time period. What is the Church? When I use the word ‘Church’ it generally means everybody working for the Church, from the pope at its head down to the priests and clerks. It also includes all of the buildings and land attached to Christianity and the money that comes in from those lands. When we refer to ‘the Church’ it means the whole picture, not just a physical building, i.e. the village church. Why was the Church so important? In medieval England, the Church dominated everybody's life. All Medieval people - be they village peasants, barons, knights, kings or towns people - believed that God, Heaven and Hell existed The control the Church had over the people was total. For example, peasants worked for free on church land for a certain number of days a year and had to give 10% of their earnings to the Church (this payment was called a Tithe) The Church was very wealthy and owned lots of land, some reasons are: - If you died you had to pay to be buried on Church lands - If you were born you had to give a donation in order to be baptised - You could buy ‘Indulgences’ to guarantee you would go to heaven. Interestingly, when Henry VIII dissolved the monasteries (buildings where monks lived) in the 1500’s he received 25% of total land in England.
    [Show full text]
  • Doccombe and Its Canterbury Overlords
    ‘Our far-flung poor little manor in Devon’: Doccombe and its Canterbury Overlords Bill Hardiman, Moretonhampstead History Society The back-story In 1174 King Henry II put his seal to confirm a charter that changed for ever the destiny of a corner of north-east Dartmoor. ‘I grant & make over to the Chapter of Canterbury, for the love of God & the salvation of my own soul & the souls of my ancestors, & for the love of blessed Thomas Archbishop & Martyr, of venerable memory, by way of alms in perpetuity & free from any & all charges, one hundred shillings' worth of land in Moreton[hampstead], namely Doccombe with its appurtenances & with the adjacent lands, in such manner that those hundred shillings' worth of land may be made up from Doccombe & the other adjoining lands. I grant this for the clothing & provision of one monk in that monastery for ever, who may celebrate masses there for the salvation of the living & the repose of the departed.’ The original grant had in fact been made by William de Tracy in an Italian monastery. Doccombe is not mentioned in Domesday Book and as far as we know had not hitherto been a separate manor. So who was de Tracy and why did he make this grant? It was once thought that he was an illegitimate son of Henry I. Meticulous research by Professor Nicholas Vincent has recently found, however, that he was probably the son of Turgis de Tracy, of the hamlet of Tracy, near Vire in Normandy and married to an English heiress. He held considerable property in Normandy and Devon, including Moretonhampstead for the nominal annual fee of an unmewed sparrowhawk.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Three the Households of Royal Illegitimate Family Members and Their Networks of Power
    Durham E-Theses Illegitimacy and Power: 12th Century Anglo-Norman and Angevin Illegitimate Family Members within Aristocratic Society TURNER, JAMES How to cite: TURNER, JAMES (2020) Illegitimacy and Power: 12th Century Anglo-Norman and Angevin Illegitimate Family Members within Aristocratic Society, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/13464/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Abstract Illegitimacy and Power: 12th Century Anglo-Norman and Angevin Illegitimate Family Members within Aristocratic Society By James Turner The Anglo-Norman and Angevin kings of the twelfth century were supported in the pursuit of their political and hegemonic activities by individual illegitimate members of the royal family. Illegitimate royal family members represented a cadre of auxiliary family members from which Anglo-Norman and Angevin kings, throughout the twelfth century, deployed specific members as a means of advancing their shared interests.
    [Show full text]