Responding to the Riots and Promoting Safe, Resilient Communities London’S Local Councils: Responding to the Riots and Promoting Safe, Resilient Communities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Responding to the Riots and Promoting Safe, Resilient Communities London’S Local Councils: Responding to the Riots and Promoting Safe, Resilient Communities London’s Local Councils: Responding to the riots and promoting safe, resilient communities London’s Local Councils: Responding to the riots and promoting safe, resilient communities 1. Overview When the riots began in August, London’s councils were faced with an unprecedented challenge. Their responses, individually and collectively, demonstrated both an organisational agility and a determination to respond in the right way to highly unpredictable events. Working alongside police, local communities and businesses, clean-up operations were carried out swiftly and effectively within hours of the disturbances ending. This was followed by a concerted effort to begin recovering from the disorder both within boroughs and across the capital to support the many residents who had been affected, as well as local businesses faced with financial uncertainty and a substantial loss of trade. The much bigger question facing London local government is how it might ensure that disturbances on this scale don’t happen again. The role of councils extends far beyond a timely and well-executed response to disruptive events. Boroughs are there to shape their communities, actively addressing a wide span of challenges across society, by early intervention with families, through work to challenge gangs, rehabilitate offenders and develop policies that sustain their local economy and build communities. London Councils develops policy and lobbies on behalf of 33 London boroughs. There are a wide range of services provided by the London boroughs which we consider to be effective at tackling the issues that undermine social resilience which the panel is considering. We wanted to focus on three areas we feel are important to draw to your attention. These are · Early intervention and prevention initiatives · Dealing with those at a high risk of offending or re-offending · Ensuring a healthy local economy and environment In order to answer one of the key points the panel has raised, namely how public services engaged with communities before, during and after the riots, we have also set out in this paper the immediate response to the riots, and the recovery work which has been underway since they happened. Background to the riots The panel is considering what might have motivated a minority of people to take part in the disorder and why, in some areas, there was no disorder. We believe that many factors lay behind the cause of the riots, and that these varied between groups of people, according to place, age and circumstance. However, there are a set of common factors which create an environment that appear to pre-dispose individuals to choose to step outside the law. 1 As the Home Office and Ministry of Justice data show, many of those who were detained over the disorder had disadvantaged and criminal backgrounds. In London, 71% of detainees had already had one conviction or caution. Riot statistics point to a large number of educational factors which may have contributed to the sense of disengagement which has been reported by several groups as a contributory factor. Only 10% of those detained had five or more grade A* to C grades at GCSE, compared with the national average of 53%. 30% were persistent absentees from school, 36% had been suspended from school at least once in a year, and their absence rates were far higher. Nationally, of those detained, 11.3% had been excluded from school, far higher than the national average of 0.1%. Sixty-six per cent of young people were classified as having some form of special educational need. This compares to 21 per cent of all pupils in maintained secondary schools. Two-fifths of them (42%) were receiving free school meals, more than three times the national average. Those brought before the court, were far more likely to be young, poor and educationally disadvantaged, and have far lower chances of work as a result. It is also clear that in some communities there are many young people, particularly young men whose disengagement with school and lack of work goes hand in hand with a lack of aspiration or hope. Youth unemployment is worse in London than the rest of the UK. In the year to December 2010, youth unemployment in the capital was 23 percent, which is equivalent to 118,000 unemployed young people. The rate of youth unemployment in the rest of the UK (excluding London) was 19 percent. For those without qualifications, their job prospects are shrinking in the current economic climate. Almost a quarter of working age Londoners are not working – 1.3 million, as of August 2011. London is home to just under a quarter of all households that have never worked in England, some 86,000 households in all. These background factors in no way justify what happened during this week in August, and borough leaders are clear that much of what took place was opportunistic crime which had a severe impact on residents and traders in the communities The rioters represented a clear minority of this group, with some 2,800 in London arrested to date, but it is equally true that many, many more young Londoners who came from the same disadvantaged background, had a poor start at school or had no job chose not to break the law. The job of councils to offer interventions which help individuals at risk of turning to crime to see an alternative future with a stake in society, whether it is through pupil referral units, or getting out of gangs, or finding an apprenticeship. Much of the work of boroughs involves looking at how the most vulnerable families and individuals can be helped to turn their lives around. Prevention and early intervention ranges from mainstream services which support children and young people through to targeted projects which provide intensive support for families with multiple problems. These projects focus scarce resources through intelligent approaches to address a considerable range of problems that individuals and families face. Underpinning all of these targeted interventions are a wide range of initiatives that support and develop a healthy local economy and environment. This includes a focus on neighbourhoods, housing estates, town centres, and the mesh of physical and skill-based development that support jobs and growth. What we understand by economic resilience is a system which 2 enables local businesses to prosper in a safe and steady environment, and creates a platform for initiatives that link disadvantaged residents to economic opportunities. The work in recovering from the events in August is not over. Hundreds of shops and dozens of high streets were damaged. At least 1,700 Londoners have been charged in connection with the riots and the police are seeking more. Although many high streets are repaired and back to normal and stores are trading once again, there are much wider questions to be answered for communities faced with a breakdown of order on such a scale. The continuing response will need to balance prevention and diversion with co-ordinated action to challenge criminality. This needs to be underpinned by strategies which create jobs and local economic opportunity. Giving councils the resources and the power to expand their tried and tested interventions, working hand in hand with voluntary groups, offers, in our view, the best opportunity to strengthen communities and develop sustainable social and economic resilience. 2. The immediate response and restoration work During 6–10 August 2011, incidents of widespread public disorder, looting and arson occurred across many parts of London. The disorder spread fast across London, with the worst disturbances centred on borough high streets and retail shopping parks. For the London local authorities, the rioting taking place at such a speed and on such a scale was unprecedented, and threatened to bring with it sizeable economic and social damage. 29 out of the 33 London boroughs suffered some form of physical damage during that period; and yet the majority went on to make a swift and significant recovery. Thanks to the hard work and co-ordinated efforts within and across the boroughs, the established London-wide systems of emergency planning and visibly strong support from communities, the damage done to high streets, shops and residential properties was tackled very fast. Borough CCTV networks were monitored through council control centres and were able to assist police in mobilising to deal with emerging hotspots, as well as providing useful evidence at a later stage. Some boroughs were able to deploy mobile CCTV vans to help with identifying rioters – building on existing strong partnerships between the local authority and local police. In London, a total of 3,461 crimes have been recorded in relation to the riots, according to the Home Office data. This represents 68% of the total riot-related crime. Within London, the boroughs of Croydon (430), Southwark (314), Haringey (303), and Ealing (279) recorded the highest number of crimes. There have been 2,879 arrests, and 71% of those arrested have a previous conviction. 16% of those are over the age of 30. Clean up As the scale of the rioting and disorder became clearer, boroughs swiftly started work clearing up the affected areas. Street cleaning teams liaised with the emergency planning departments so that the streets were swept of glass and debris, without breaking through the cordons placed around the unsafe buildings. The speed of the clean up was remarkable. Some areas had swept away all debris by 6am that morning. Volunteers also came together in a remarkable show of community spirit to do sweeping, and this in turn led to a very positive use of social media as communities co-ordinated 3 their actions to support local businesses as they dealt with the aftermath.
Recommended publications
  • Guide to London Councils
    Our leadership London London needs to build an extra we are a member-led organisation by numbers 800,000 Guide to new homes The Leaders’ Committee is our main decision-making by 2021 to clear its backlog and keep pace body. The committee includes the Leaders of each With a population of more than with its growing population London borough council. Leaders’ Committee sets policy and takes decisions on the latest developments affecting London , London local government. The committee meets at 59½ 8.3million London is the most populous city in Europe London Underground trains carried more than Southwark Street. Meeting dates, agendas and minutes are available at www.londoncouncils.gov/uk/committees 1.17 billion Councils There are passengers Our Executive acts as a forum for more detailed policy in 2012, a new record development and reports to the Leaders’ Committee. 33 local The Executive is made up of 11 members from across the political groups. authorities in London comprised of Between December 2012 and December 2013, 629 wards the Metropolitan Police dealt with just over Our Grants Committee, comprising 33 councillors, and represented by 709,000 one from each of London’s local councils, oversees the London Boroughs Grants Scheme, set up under the 1985 crimes 1,855 elected (all notifiable offences), more than Local Government Act. The grants programme is funded 10 per cent fewer than the previous year and governed by the 32 London boroughs and the City councillors of London. There are more than London’s councils collect around The Transport and Environment Committee (TEC), provides a range of high quality operational services 3,000 schools 4 million such as parking and traffic appeals, the lorry control in London, educating around scheme, the Freedom Pass and Taxicard schemes.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Common Ground with Bexley
    Statement of Common Ground between LB Southwark and LB Bexley November 2019 1 Introduction This Statement of Common Ground (SCG) addresses the strategic matters specific to Southwark and Bexley. This SCG has been prepared by Southwark Council in agreement with the London Borough of Bexley. The purpose of the SCG is to document the cross-boundary matters being addressed and progress in cooperating to address them. This SCG ensures that the requirements set out in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) have been met. The NPPF states, “Local planning authorities and county councils (in two-tier areas) are under a duty to cooperate with each other, and with other prescribed bodies, on strategic matters that cross administrative boundaries.” Southwark Council engages with other boroughs and the City of London through regular meetings either between officers or elected members with formalised governance arrangements such as the London Councils Leaders’ Committee, Association of London Borough Planning Officers, the Cross River Partnership, and the South East London Duty to Cooperate Group. We also maintain correspondence between planning departments on a variety of issues and projects and organise additional meetings on strategic planning matters when needed. Figure 1: Locations of Southwark and Bexley within Greater London. 2 Strategic Geography London Borough of Southwark Southwark is a densely populated and diverse inner London borough set over almost 30km of land to the south of the River Thames. Home to over 314,000 people, the borough is a patchwork of communities set over 23 diverse wards. Whilst the northern part of the borough already enjoys excellent transport links to the rest of London, the south is due to benefit from the extension of the Bakerloo Line, which will open up areas including the Old Kent Road to new growth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Adverse Weather Conditions on Transport
    House of Commons Transport Committee The effects of adverse weather conditions on transport Fourth Report of Session 2008–09 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 20 May 2009 HC 328 Published on 29 May 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Department for Transport and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman MP (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chairman) Mr David Clelland MP (Labour, Tyne Bridge) Mr Philip Hollobone MP (Conservative, Kettering) Mr John Leech MP (Liberal Democrat, Manchester, Withington) Mr Eric Martlew MP (Labour, Carlisle) Mark Pritchard MP (Conservative, The Wrekin) Ms Angela C Smith MP (Labour, Sheffield, Hillsborough) Sir Peter Soulsby MP (Labour, Leicester South) Graham Stringer MP (Labour, Manchester Blackley) Mr David Wilshire MP (Conservative, Spelthorne) Sammy Wilson MP (Democratic Unionist, East Antrim) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/transcom. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Annette Toft (Clerk), Jyoti Chandola (Second Clerk), David Davies (Committee Specialist), Marek Kubala (Inquiry Manager), Alison Mara (Senior Committee Assistant), Jacqueline Cooksey (Committee Assistant), Stewart McIlvenna (Committee Support Assistant) and Hannah Pearce (Media Officer).
    [Show full text]
  • Common Council
    Public Document Pack PLEASE BRING THIS AGENDA WITH YOU 1 The Lord Mayor will take the Chair at ONE of the clock in the afternoon precisely. COMMON COUNCIL SIR/MADAM, You are desired to be at a Court of Court of Common Council, at GUILDHALL , on THURSDAY next, the 21st day of June, 2012. CHRISTOPHER DUFFIELD, Town Clerk & Chief Executive . Guildhall, Wednesday 13th June 2012 Sir Robert Finch Aldermen on the Rota John Garbutt 2 1 Question - That the Minutes of the last Court are correctly recorded? 2 The Right Honourable The Lord Mayor's report on overseas visits. 3 Resolutions on Retirements, Congratulatory Resolutions, Memorials, etc. 4 Statement from the Chairman of the Policy and Resources Committee. 5 Docquets for the Hospital Seal. 6 List of applicants for the Freedom of the City: (A list of names, together with those of the nominators, has been separately circulated). 7 The Town Clerk to report the results of ballots taken at the last Court, viz:- * denotes appointment § denotes less than ten years’ service on the Court; # denotes less than five years’ service on the Court; and < denotes a Member who served on the original Governance Review Working Party. (a) One Member on the Board of Governors of the Museum of London for the balance of a term expiring in November 2013; Michael Henderson-Begg 3 Wendy Marilyn Hyde 13 Jeremy Paul Mayhew, M.A., M.B.A. 14 Ann Marjorie Francescia Pembroke 7 Neil Graham Morgan Redcliffe, Alderman 14 John George Stewart Scott, J.P., B.A.(Hons) 33 * Jeremy Lewis Simons M.Sc.
    [Show full text]
  • London Councils
    London Councils Minutes of the London Councils Leaders’ Committee held on 15 July 2014 Mayor Jules Pipe chaired the meeting Present: BARKING AND DAGENHAM Cllr D. J. Rodwell BARNET Cllr Richard Cornelius BEXLEY Cllr Teresa O’Neill BRENT Cllr M. A. Butt BROMLEY Cllr Stephen Carr CAMDEN Cllr Sarah Hayward CROYDON Cllr Tony Newman EALING Cllr Julian Bell ENFIELD Cllr Doug Taylor GREENWICH Cllr Denise Hyland HACKNEY Mayor Jules Pipe HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM Cllr Stephen Cowan HARINGEY Cllr Claire Kober HARROW Cllr David Perry HAVERING Cllr Roger Ramsey HILLINGDON Cllr Ray Puddifoot MBE HOUNSLOW Cllr Amrit Mann ISLINGTON Cllr Richard Watts KENSINGTON & CHELSEA Cllr Nicholas Paget-Brown KINGSTON Cllr Kevin Davis LAMBETH Cllr Lib Peck LEWISHAM Cllr Alan Smith MERTON Cllr Stephen Alambritis NEWHAM - REDBRIDGE Cllr Jas Athwal RICHMOND UPON THAMES Cllr Lord True SOUTHWARK Cllr Peter John SUTTON Cllr Ruth Dombey TOWER HAMLETS - WALTHAM FOREST Cllr Clyde Loakes WANDSWORTH Cllr Ravi Govindia WESTMINSTER Cllr Melvyn Caplan CITY OF LONDON Mr Mark Boleat LFEPA - CO-PRESIDENT Lord Andrew Adonis Apologies: CO-PRESIDENT Baroness Joan Hanham CO-PRESIDENT Baroness Sally Hamwee LEWISHAM Mayor Sir Steve Bullock HOUNSLOW Cllr Steve Curran NEWHAM Mayor Sir Robin Wales TOWER HAMLETS Mayor Lutfur Rahman WALTHAM FOREST Cllr Chris Robbins WESTMINSTER Cllr Philippa Roe EQUALITIES Cllr Marie Pye Ex officio (under the provisions of Standing Order 2.2) CAPITAL AMBITION Mr Edward Lord JP OBE CC GRANTS Cllr Paul McGlone In attendance: Isabel Dedring, Deputy Mayor Transport, GLA Jeremy Skinner, Head of Strategic Projects and Policy Evaluation, GLA Jeff Jacobs, Head of Paid Service, Executive Director, Communities and Intelligence, GLA Fiona Fletcher-Smith, Executive Director for Development, Enterprise and Environment, GLA Professor Tony Travers, LSE and London Councils officers 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture, Heritage and Libraries Committee
    Public Document Pack Culture, Heritage and Libraries Committee Date: MONDAY, 2 JULY 2012 Time: 11.30am Venue: COMMITTEE ROOM - 2ND FLOOR WEST WING, GUILDHALL Members: John Scott (Chairman) Julian Malins Vivienne Littlechild (Deputy Sheriff & Deputy Wendy Mead Chairman) Robert Merrett John Bird Sylvia Moys Mark Boleat Barbara Newman Deputy Dennis Cotgrove Deputy Janet Owen Martin Day Alderman Dr Andrew Parmley Deputy Billy Dove Ann Pembroke Peter Dunphy Henrika Priest Deputy Anthony Eskenzi Stephen Quilter Kevin Everett Deputy Richard Regan Martin Farr Delis Regis Brian Harris Deputy Robin Sherlock Michael Henderson-Begg Deputy Michael Welbank Tom Hoffman Alderman Fiona Woolf William Hunt Alderman David Graves (Ex-Officio Deputy Alastair King Member) Oliver Lodge Deputy Catherine McGuinness (Ex- Officio Member) Enquiries: Matthew Pitt tel. no.: 020 7332 1425 [email protected] Lunch will be served in Guildhall Club at 1pm Chris Duffield Town Clerk and Chief Executive AGENDA Part 1 - Public Agenda 1. APOLOGIES 2. DECLARATIONS BY MEMB ERS OF ANY PER SONAL OR PREJUDICIAL INTERESTS IN RESPECT OF ITEMS ON THIS AGENDA 3. MINUTES To approve the public minutes of the meeting held on 28 May 2012. For Decision (Pages 1 - 8) 4. REVIEW OF THE GOVERN ANCE ARRANGEMENTS IM PLEMENTED IN 2011 Report of the Town Clerk on behalf of the Post Implementation Governance Review Working Party (copy attached). For Decision (Pages 9 - 20) 5. CITY OF LONDON TARTA N Report of the Town Clerk (copy attached). For Decision (Pages 21 - 24) 6. CITY ARTS INITIATIVE Report of the Town Clerk (copy attached). Please note that the appendix to this item is confidential.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Relations Sub-Committee
    Public Document Pack Public Relations Sub-Committee Date: THURSDAY, 7 JUNE 201 2 Time: 12.00noon Venue: COMMITTEE ROOMS, WES T WING, G UILDHALL Members: Mark Boleat (Chairman) Stuart Fraser (Deputy Chairman) Deputy Douglas Barrow Deputy Michael Cassidy Roger Chadwick Deputy Sir Michael Snyder James Tumbridge Enquiries: Angela Roach tel.no.: 020 7332 3685 [email protected] Lunch will be served for Members in the Guildhall Club at 1pm Chris Duffield Town Clerk and Chief Executive AGENDA 1. APOLOGIES 2. DECLARATIONS BY MEMB ERS OF PERSONAL OR P REJUDICIAL INTERESTS IN RESPECT OF ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING 3. TERMS OF REFERENCE To note the Sub-Committee’s terms of reference as follows:- To consider and report to the Grand Committee on all matters relating to the Corporation’s Public Relations/Public Affairs activities including any related plans, policies or strategies . 4. MINUTES To agree the public minutes and summary of the meeting held on 23 February 2012 (copy attached). For Decision (Pages 1 - 6) 5. COMMUNICATIONS STRAT EGY 2012 - 2015: UPDATE Report of the Director of Public Relations (copy attached). For Decision (Pages 7 - 26) 6. ADDITIONAL EVENTS AN D TOPICAL ISSUES PAP ERS Report of the Director of Public Relations (copy attached). For Decision (Pages 27 - 32) 7. QUESTIONS ON MATTERS RELATING TO THE WORK OF THE SUB - COMMITTEE 8. ANY OTHER BUSINESS THAT THE CH AIRMAN CONSIDERS URG ENT 2 Agenda Item 4 PUBLIC RELATIONS SUB-COMMITTEE 23 February 2012 Minutes of the meeting of the PUBLIC RELATIONS SUB-COMMITTEE held at Guildhall, EC2 on THURSDAY, 23 FEBRUARY 2012 at 12.00noon.
    [Show full text]
  • London Councils' Transport and Environment Committee
    London Councils’ Transport and Environment Committee Dockless Bicycles – Item No: E2 Londonwide Byelaw x x Report by: Katharina Winbeck Job title: Strategic Lead, Transport & Environment, Policy and Public Affairs Division Date: 10 October 2019 Contact Officer: Katharina Winbeck Telephone: 020 7934 9945 Email:Katharina.winbeck@londoncoun cils.gov.uk Summary: This report updates TEC on the proposed pan-London parking byelaw for the regulation of dockless bicycle hire schemes in London. Recommendations: Members are asked to: 1. Note the update; 2. Note the current draft text of the byelaw; 3. Note that the next step in the timetable is sharing the draft wording of the byelaw with dockless operators Dockless Bicycles - Londonwide Byelaw London Councils’ TEC – 10 October 2019 Agenda Item E2, Page 1 Update 1. TEC has previously agreed that the correct future approach for dockless bike sharing is to move away from the status quo, where Boroughs reach individual agreements with specific operators, and instead move to borderless operations throughout Greater London. 2. Controlling bike fleets would be achieved by Boroughs using existing powers to designate parking places for dockless bikes, and (following the necessary delegation of powers which was discussed and agreed at the June 2019 TEC meeting) TEC promoting a pan-London byelaw on Boroughs’ behalf to prohibit bike operators from parking dockless bikes other than at those approved designated parking places. 3. Discussions between TfL, London Councils and Borough Officers have led to the attached draft byelaw. 4. There are currently five dockless bike operators working in London and a sixth may launch before next spring.
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Tower Hamlets Appointments to External Bodies 2005-2006 Organisation Number of On-Going Current Labour Liberal Appointed Contact Reps
    LONDON BOROUGH OF TOWER HAMLETS APPOINTMENTS TO EXTERNAL BODIES 2005-2006 ORGANISATION NUMBER OF ON-GOING CURRENT LABOUR LIBERAL APPOINTED CONTACT REPS. TO BE APPOINTMENTS APPOINTMENTS GROUP DEMOCRAT DETAILS APPOINTED NOMINATIONS GROUP COUNCILLOR NOMINATIONS 2005/2006 COUNCILLOR 2005/2006 Age Concern Tower 1 Cllr Ray Gipson Cllr Brian Son Cllr Ray Gipson Cllr Brian Son Debbie Walker Hamlets (Appointed at AGM (Appointed at ACTH 19th May, 2004) GPC 16th June, Chief 2005 Executive/Company Secretary 82 Russia Lane London E2 9LU 020 8981 7124 Arts Council for 2 Cllr Denise Jones Cllr Denise Jones Mr Stephen England Cllr Helal Rahman Cllr Helal Rahman Durham (New) (Appointed at London Arts replaced London GPC 16th June, 2 Pear Tree Court Arts 2005) London EC1 0DS Action for Bow – 1 Cllr Martin Rew Cllr Martin Rew Cllr Martin Rew Tower Hamlets Endowment Trust (Appointed at Council (Appointed at Housing Action 16th June 2004) GPC 16th June, Trust 2005) 524-544 Roman Road Bow E3 5ES 020 893 5280 Aldgate & 1 M. Abdus Salique Cllr Fanu Miah Cllr Fanu Miah C J Matthews All Hallows (Apopinted at AGM (Appointed at 31 Jewry Street Exhibition 19th May, 2004) GPC 16th June, London EC3N 2EY Foundation 2005) 020 7488 2518 Term of Office: 3 years Bethnal Green The 2 Cllr Denise Jones Cllr Denise Jones Clrr Hilary Phelps Cllr Denise Jones Ms Marion Baker Museum Cllr Hilary Phelps Cllr Hilary Phelps Head of Operations of Childhood (Appointed at Council (Appointed at Cambridge Heath 16th June, 2004) GPC 16th June, Road 2005) London E2 9PA 1 ORGANISATION NUMBER ON-GOING CURRENT LABOUR LIBERAL APPOINTED CONTACT OF REPS.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum of London Annual Report and Financial Statements Year Ended 31St March 2012
    Registered Charity No: 1139250 MUSEUM OF LONDON Governors’ Report and Financial Statements for the year ended 31 March 2012 Museum of London Annual Report and Financial Statements Year Ended 31st March 2012 CONTENTS Reference and administrative details 2 - 4 Annual Report 5 – 23 Independent Auditors’ Report 24 – 25 Consolidated Statement of Financial Activities 26 Consolidated Balance Sheet 27 Museum of London Balance Sheet 28 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 29 - 30 Notes to the Financial Statements 31 - 52 1 Museum of London Annual Report and Financial Statements Year Ended 31st March 2012 REFERENCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS Name Museum of London Address 150 London Wall London EC2Y 5HN Board of Governors A Board of Governors, consisting of 18 members of whom the Greater London Authority (GLA) (prior to April 2008: the Prime Minister) and the City of London Corporation (COL), each appoints 9 members, is responsible for the general management and control of the Museum. The following Governors served throughout the financial year, except where indicated. Appointed by the Kenneth Ayers (ceased to be a Trustee 22 March 2012) City of London Rt Hon the Lord Boateng P.C. D.L. Corporation Sir Steve Bullock (appointed 20 April 2011) Michael Cassidy CBE Rev Dr Martin Dudley Robert Dufton Tom Hoffman Julian H Malins QC John Scott (appointed 21 June 2012) Michael Welbank Appointed by the GLA Jennette Arnold (prior to April 2008 : by the Blondel Cluff Prime Minister) Rosemary Ewles Gillian Day (appointed 5 October 2011) Andrew Macdonald Camilla Mash Mark Palmer-Edgecumbe Eric Reynolds Eric Sorensen Administration Under the Museum of London Acts 1965 and 1986, the Board is required to appoint a Director of the Museum to be responsible to the Board for: .
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the 7 July Review Committee
    cover2.qxd 5/26/06 3:41 pm Page 1 Report of the 7 July Review Committee - Volume 2 Volume - Committee Report of the 7 July Review Report of the 7 July Review Committee Volume 2: Views and information from organisations Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk Enquiries 020 7983 4100 June 2006 Minicom 020 7983 4458 LA/May 06/SD D&P Volume 2: Views and information from organisations Contents Page Transcript of hearing on 3 November 2005 3 Transport for London, Metropolitan Police Service, City of London Police, British Transport Police, London Fire Brigade and London Ambulance Service Transcript of hearing on 1 December 2005 Telecommunications companies: BT, O2, Vodafone, Cable & Wireless 61 Communication with businesses: London Chamber of Commerce & Industry 90 and Metropolitan Police Service Transcript of hearing on 11 January 2006 Local authorities: Croydon Council (Local Authority Gold on 7 July), Camden 109 Council, Tower Hamlets Council and Westminster City Council Health Service: NHS London, Barts & the London NHS Trust, Great Ormond 122 Street Hospital, Royal London Hospital and Royal College of Nursing Media: Sky News, BBC News, BBC London, ITV News, LBC News & Heart 132 106.2, Capital Radio and London Media Emergency Forum, Evening Standard, The Times Transcript of hearing on 1 March 2006 147 Ken Livingstone, Mayor of London Sir Ian Blair, Metropolitan Police Commissioner Written submissions from organisations Metropolitan Police 167 City of London Police 175 London Fire Brigade
    [Show full text]
  • The Content, Function. and Character of the Civic Registers of London and York C.1274-C.1482
    'The Veray Registre of All Trouthe': The Content, Function. and Character of the Civic Registers of London and York c.1274-c.1482 Deborah Jean Steele O'Brien A Thesis Submitted for the Qualification of D.Phil. at the Centre for Medieval Studies, the University of York May. 1999 2 Abstract This thesis offers a characterisation of the medieval civic register, based on a study of the content, structure, presentation and function of manuscript registers held by the administrations of London and York between c. 1274 and c. 1482. Previous scholarly discussions of administrative writing produced in medieval English towns have tended to treat this material simply as an unproblematic source of historical data, or either to focus on single records, or provide a survey of urban, or even national, documentation in general. This study argues that the civic register functioned as a distinct genre in the medieval city, and that treatment of it in its own right as an element of urban culture provides significant evidence of both literate practice and a sense of citizenship in this period. Chapter One discusses the context of the production and reception of writing in the medieval English city in which these civic registers were compiled. Chapters Two and Three constitute detailed studies of the content, structure, and the circumstances surrounding the production of civic registers from London and York respectively. Chapter Two focuses on four of the manuscripts categorised as custumals in London's Corporation of London Record Office, comparing them with other administrative and privately held manuscripts from the city. Chapter Three engages in a process of reconstructing the likely medieval state of both one of York's medieval registers, and the collection of registers in its archive as a whole, based on surviving manuscript evidence.
    [Show full text]