DOCSLIB.ORG

London Councils

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
London Councils London Councils Minutes of the London Councils Leaders’ Committee held on 15 July 2014 Mayor Jules Pipe chaired the meeting Present: BARKING AND DAGENHAM Cllr D. J. Rodwell BARNET Cllr Richard Cornelius BEXLEY Cllr Teresa O’Neill BRENT Cllr M. A. Butt BROMLEY Cllr Stephen Carr CAMDEN Cllr Sarah Hayward CROYDON Cllr Tony Newman EALING Cllr Julian Bell ENFIELD Cllr Doug Taylor GREENWICH Cllr Denise Hyland HACKNEY Mayor Jules Pipe HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM Cllr Stephen Cowan HARINGEY Cllr Claire Kober HARROW Cllr David Perry HAVERING Cllr Roger Ramsey HILLINGDON Cllr Ray Puddifoot MBE HOUNSLOW Cllr Amrit Mann ISLINGTON Cllr Richard Watts KENSINGTON & CHELSEA Cllr Nicholas Paget-Brown KINGSTON Cllr Kevin Davis LAMBETH Cllr Lib Peck LEWISHAM Cllr Alan Smith MERTON Cllr Stephen Alambritis NEWHAM - REDBRIDGE Cllr Jas Athwal RICHMOND UPON THAMES Cllr Lord True SOUTHWARK Cllr Peter John SUTTON Cllr Ruth Dombey TOWER HAMLETS - WALTHAM FOREST Cllr Clyde Loakes WANDSWORTH Cllr Ravi Govindia WESTMINSTER Cllr Melvyn Caplan CITY OF LONDON Mr Mark Boleat LFEPA - CO-PRESIDENT Lord Andrew Adonis Apologies: CO-PRESIDENT Baroness Joan Hanham CO-PRESIDENT Baroness Sally Hamwee LEWISHAM Mayor Sir Steve Bullock HOUNSLOW Cllr Steve Curran NEWHAM Mayor Sir Robin Wales TOWER HAMLETS Mayor Lutfur Rahman WALTHAM FOREST Cllr Chris Robbins WESTMINSTER Cllr Philippa Roe EQUALITIES Cllr Marie Pye Ex officio (under the provisions of Standing Order 2.2) CAPITAL AMBITION Mr Edward Lord JP OBE CC GRANTS Cllr Paul McGlone In attendance: Isabel Dedring, Deputy Mayor Transport, GLA Jeremy Skinner, Head of Strategic Projects and Policy Evaluation, GLA Jeff Jacobs, Head of Paid Service, Executive Director, Communities and Intelligence, GLA Fiona Fletcher-Smith, Executive Director for Development, Enterprise and Environment, GLA Professor Tony Travers, LSE and London Councils officers 1. Declarations of interest Cllr. Sarah Hayward (Camden, Labour) declared an interest in item one as a member of the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority. No other interests were declared. 2. Minutes of Leaders’ Committee held on the 11 March 2014 Leaders’ Committee agreed the minutes of Leaders’ Committee held on the 11 March 2014. 3. Welcome to new members The Chair welcomed the new and returning borough leaders attending the meeting. 4. London Infrastructure Investment Plan 2050 The Chair invited Isabel Dedring, Deputy Mayor Transport and Jeremy Skinner, Head of Strategic Projects and Policy Evaluation at the GLA to address the meeting. Ms Dedring began by pointing out that Mr Skinner was the lead officer and then explained that: • In the London Infrastructure Development Plan the Mayor was creating a long-term plan for Housing, Transport, Waste and Energy • It followed the publication of the London 2020 Vision and London Finance Commission (LFC) reports • It was not party political and would go forward whatever the outcome of the general election in 2015 and the Mayoral election in 2016 • A draft version of the infrastructure report would be published at the end of July to inform further discussion and she would be happy to attend a further meeting of Leaders’ Committee to that end and it was envisaged that the final report would be published at the end of the year. Mr Skinner then made a presentation: • The GLA hoped to hold sessions with groups of councils during the consultation period and further discussions with London Councils. • He was grateful for the support of London Councils’ officers and members in helping with the development of the plan, including assessing the overall needs and costs in schools and housing. There were three critical messages to be got across: • The overall magnitude of London’s growth that was anticipated • The need to overcome the fractured delivery of infrastructure so that it worked better for London • How much the plan might cost and how it might be paid for. Growth • The work on the infrastructure plan was timely in that London was about to enter an unprecedented era of growth. It was thought London would exceed its population peak of 1939 as early as next year. During the nineteen-eighties manufacturing industry had declined in London and although there had been an expansion in the ‘knowledge economy’ particularly financial services, population had fallen. However, most predictions now envisaged a period of sustained economic growth in London with population reaching 11,000,000 by 2050. While there would continue to be debate about whether growth was good, it reflected the success of London’s economy in generating jobs. Jobs attracted people and in a global marketplace, there was little to stop London from growing. Preparation was vital. Infrastructure underpinned everything • Combined with the relative backlog in infrastructure investment, increasing expectations, and the need to improve quality of life, even as the city grew, London’s growth translated into significant demand for new infrastructure • While London was relatively dense, it still had significant reservoirs of brownfield land that could be developed with the appropriate remediation, transport and other infrastructure. While the question of the Green Belt would eventually have to be confronted, not until 2025 under current projections at the very earliest - as sites for growth had been identified within London’s boundaries - and possibly much later. Delivery • The delivery of London’s infrastructure was faltering under various systems of infrastructure provision, with a mixture of competitive markets in mobile telephone services, monopolies like BT Open Reach and Thames Water, duopolies like BT and Virgin for NGA fibre broadband, and public services including TfL and the local road network in London. Three ways of bringing greater integration, forward planning and efficiencies were being proposed: o In the absence of any statutory power, the Mayor’s soft power would be used to convene the leaders of these organisations. The initial purpose would be to achieve common understanding regarding London’s growth in more detail – its pace, opportunity areas within the capital, the demographic profile and so on; thereafter to develop more integrated approaches to London’s growth and to deliver projects more efficiently. o Secondly, to tackle the lack of any statutory requirements to deliver infrastructure in a more co-ordinated way. There were various options here, but one would be to lobby for a statutory duty on infrastructure providers and their regulators to have regard for the London Plan and other strategic planning documents. o Third, some of the regulations that prevent the delivery of infrastructure ahead of demand, particularly in energy were being tackling with national Government. Cost • To give a flavour of the content of the infrastructure programmes within the plan, the following was being proposed: o A series of transport investments to support London’s economy, expand the transport network to enable new areas of housing to emerge and improve quality of life. Schemes included, for instance, a significant transformation of the south London rail network so that it resembled more a true Metro service, with higher frequency services o An approach to public realm and green space that considered it in terms of a potential network of green infrastructure providing multiple benefits – recreation, space for walking and cycling, wildlife, shade, flood protection and a generally more attractive environment, which would become increasingly valued as the city continued otherwise to get more crowded and busy. o Relatively modest investment in fibre broadband, 4g, wifi and future ICT technologies such as 5G, on which R&D was underway, to deliver superfast connectivity from mobile and fixed devices wherever you were in London. o Significant investment in our electricity sub-station network, enabled by better regulation, and greater incentives for more local energy production to provide both more energy and greater resilience. • All these and more resulted in a significant bill. The headline was a potential doubling of the overall capital costs, but this was before savings and contributions from fiscal devolution (which would be discussed further in the Governance of Fiscal Devolution report later on the agenda), more integration, the higher economic growth that would be expected from investment, technological advances, efficiencies from having a transparent pipeline of projects and much better leverage of publicly owned assets. Fiscal devolution was vital. Just as the Victorians went through a massive period of infrastructure investment during a similar period of growth, so can we. The Chair called for questions and comments and the following came from members of the committee: Cllr Ravi Govindia (Wandsworth, Conservative) commented: • That he did not see any reference to Primary Care • In the case of electricity substations it was important to safeguard land where the need for infrastructure was predicted • There was a danger that the report would be too top-down and the role of local authorities with their detailed local knowledge should not be forgotten Cllr Ray Puddifoot MBE (Hillingdon, Conservative) asked whether the intention was to seek to build on Green Belt land after 2025? Cllr Alan Smith (Lewisham, Labour) argued that attention not only needed to be paid to electricity sub-stations, in addition: • Integrated thinking was needed on the micro-generation of energy through waste recovery • Ninety-eight per cent of processed water was not used for what it was supplied for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jane Bigelow Fonds
    WESTERN ARCHIVES FINDING AID FOR Jane Bigelow fonds AFC 153 Preparation of this finding aid was made possible by funding received in 2016-17 through the Young Canada Works at Building Careers in Heritage Program, a component of the Youth Employment Strategy of the Department of Canadian Heritage, Government of Canada, which was administered by the Canadian Council of Archives. Archivist: Camilla Szczesniak Table of Contents ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................Biographical Sketch/Administrative History 3 ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................Scope
    [Show full text]
  • London and Middlesex in the 1660S Introduction: the Early Modern
    London and Middlesex in the 1660s Introduction: The early modern metropolis first comes into sharp visual focus in the middle of the seventeenth century, for a number of reasons. Most obviously this is the period when Wenceslas Hollar was depicting the capital and its inhabitants, with views of Covent Garden, the Royal Exchange, London women, his great panoramic view from Milbank to Greenwich, and his vignettes of palaces and country-houses in the environs. His oblique birds-eye map- view of Drury Lane and Covent Garden around 1660 offers an extraordinary level of detail of the streetscape and architectural texture of the area, from great mansions to modest cottages, while the map of the burnt city he issued shortly after the Fire of 1666 preserves a record of the medieval street-plan, dotted with churches and public buildings, as well as giving a glimpse of the unburned areas.1 Although the Fire destroyed most of the historic core of London, the need to rebuild the burnt city generated numerous surveys, plans, and written accounts of individual properties, and stimulated the production of a new and large-scale map of the city in 1676.2 Late-seventeenth-century maps of London included more of the spreading suburbs, east and west, while outer Middlesex was covered in rather less detail by county maps such as that of 1667, published by Richard Blome [Fig. 5]. In addition to the visual representations of mid-seventeenth-century London, a wider range of documentary sources for the city and its people becomes available to the historian.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to London Councils
    Our leadership London London needs to build an extra we are a member-led organisation by numbers 800,000 Guide to new homes The Leaders’ Committee is our main decision-making by 2021 to clear its backlog and keep pace body. The committee includes the Leaders of each With a population of more than with its growing population London borough council. Leaders’ Committee sets policy and takes decisions on the latest developments affecting London , London local government. The committee meets at 59½ 8.3million London is the most populous city in Europe London Underground trains carried more than Southwark Street. Meeting dates, agendas and minutes are available at www.londoncouncils.gov/uk/committees 1.17 billion Councils There are passengers Our Executive acts as a forum for more detailed policy in 2012, a new record development and reports to the Leaders’ Committee. 33 local The Executive is made up of 11 members from across the political groups. authorities in London comprised of Between December 2012 and December 2013, 629 wards the Metropolitan Police dealt with just over Our Grants Committee, comprising 33 councillors, and represented by 709,000 one from each of London’s local councils, oversees the London Boroughs Grants Scheme, set up under the 1985 crimes 1,855 elected (all notifiable offences), more than Local Government Act. The grants programme is funded 10 per cent fewer than the previous year and governed by the 32 London boroughs and the City councillors of London. There are more than London’s councils collect around The Transport and Environment Committee (TEC), provides a range of high quality operational services 3,000 schools 4 million such as parking and traffic appeals, the lorry control in London, educating around scheme, the Freedom Pass and Taxicard schemes.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Common Ground with Bexley
    Statement of Common Ground between LB Southwark and LB Bexley November 2019 1 Introduction This Statement of Common Ground (SCG) addresses the strategic matters specific to Southwark and Bexley. This SCG has been prepared by Southwark Council in agreement with the London Borough of Bexley. The purpose of the SCG is to document the cross-boundary matters being addressed and progress in cooperating to address them. This SCG ensures that the requirements set out in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) have been met. The NPPF states, “Local planning authorities and county councils (in two-tier areas) are under a duty to cooperate with each other, and with other prescribed bodies, on strategic matters that cross administrative boundaries.” Southwark Council engages with other boroughs and the City of London through regular meetings either between officers or elected members with formalised governance arrangements such as the London Councils Leaders’ Committee, Association of London Borough Planning Officers, the Cross River Partnership, and the South East London Duty to Cooperate Group. We also maintain correspondence between planning departments on a variety of issues and projects and organise additional meetings on strategic planning matters when needed. Figure 1: Locations of Southwark and Bexley within Greater London. 2 Strategic Geography London Borough of Southwark Southwark is a densely populated and diverse inner London borough set over almost 30km of land to the south of the River Thames. Home to over 314,000 people, the borough is a patchwork of communities set over 23 diverse wards. Whilst the northern part of the borough already enjoys excellent transport links to the rest of London, the south is due to benefit from the extension of the Bakerloo Line, which will open up areas including the Old Kent Road to new growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Council
    Public Document Pack PLEASE BRING THIS AGENDA WITH YOU 1 The Lord Mayor will take the Chair at ONE of the clock in the afternoon precisely. COMMON COUNCIL SIR/MADAM, You are desired to be at a Court of Court of Common Council, at GUILDHALL , on THURSDAY next, the 21st day of June, 2012. CHRISTOPHER DUFFIELD, Town Clerk & Chief Executive . Guildhall, Wednesday 13th June 2012 Sir Robert Finch Aldermen on the Rota John Garbutt 2 1 Question - That the Minutes of the last Court are correctly recorded? 2 The Right Honourable The Lord Mayor's report on overseas visits. 3 Resolutions on Retirements, Congratulatory Resolutions, Memorials, etc. 4 Statement from the Chairman of the Policy and Resources Committee. 5 Docquets for the Hospital Seal. 6 List of applicants for the Freedom of the City: (A list of names, together with those of the nominators, has been separately circulated). 7 The Town Clerk to report the results of ballots taken at the last Court, viz:- * denotes appointment § denotes less than ten years’ service on the Court; # denotes less than five years’ service on the Court; and < denotes a Member who served on the original Governance Review Working Party. (a) One Member on the Board of Governors of the Museum of London for the balance of a term expiring in November 2013; Michael Henderson-Begg 3 Wendy Marilyn Hyde 13 Jeremy Paul Mayhew, M.A., M.B.A. 14 Ann Marjorie Francescia Pembroke 7 Neil Graham Morgan Redcliffe, Alderman 14 John George Stewart Scott, J.P., B.A.(Hons) 33 * Jeremy Lewis Simons M.Sc.
    [Show full text]
  • Westminster Abbey
    Westminster Abbey Civic Service attended in Civic State by The Lord Mayor of Westminster Councillor Audrey Lewis and Councillors of the City of Westminster Sunday 6 th July 2014 11.00 am THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER Westminster first achieved the status of a city in 1540 when, for only ten years, it became a bishopric. Its first recorded civic administration dates from 1585, in the reign of Queen Elizabeth I, when an Act authorised the establishment of a Court of Burgesses ‘for the good government of the City of Westminster’. While Queen Elizabeth I was creating mayors elsewhere in England, she was concerned that a mayor in Westminster might challenge the authority of the monarch in her own capital city, and she therefore appointed instead the High Steward of Westminster Abbey as Chairman of her newly created Court of Burgesses. The first High Steward to chair the new Court of Burgesses was the Queen’s First Minister, William Cecil, Lord Burleigh. The Court of Burgesses was an administrative body which dealt with public health and morality, planning permissions, the prevention and punishment of crime, and the regulation of weights and measures. It comprised twelve Burgesses appointed by the Dean—one for each ward. However, when the London Government Act of 1899 created twenty-eight Metropolitan Borough Councils, each having an elected Mayor, Aldermen, and Councillors, the authority of the Dean and the High Steward in secular affairs ceased. The last High Steward who was also effectively Mayor was Lord Salisbury, who was then also Prime Minister. The Duke of Norfolk was the first Mayor of Westminster.
    [Show full text]
  • London Councils' Transport and Environment Committee
    London Councils’ Transport and Environment Committee Dockless Bicycles – Item No: E2 Londonwide Byelaw x x Report by: Katharina Winbeck Job title: Strategic Lead, Transport & Environment, Policy and Public Affairs Division Date: 10 October 2019 Contact Officer: Katharina Winbeck Telephone: 020 7934 9945 Email:Katharina.winbeck@londoncoun cils.gov.uk Summary: This report updates TEC on the proposed pan-London parking byelaw for the regulation of dockless bicycle hire schemes in London. Recommendations: Members are asked to: 1. Note the update; 2. Note the current draft text of the byelaw; 3. Note that the next step in the timetable is sharing the draft wording of the byelaw with dockless operators Dockless Bicycles - Londonwide Byelaw London Councils’ TEC – 10 October 2019 Agenda Item E2, Page 1 Update 1. TEC has previously agreed that the correct future approach for dockless bike sharing is to move away from the status quo, where Boroughs reach individual agreements with specific operators, and instead move to borderless operations throughout Greater London. 2. Controlling bike fleets would be achieved by Boroughs using existing powers to designate parking places for dockless bikes, and (following the necessary delegation of powers which was discussed and agreed at the June 2019 TEC meeting) TEC promoting a pan-London byelaw on Boroughs’ behalf to prohibit bike operators from parking dockless bikes other than at those approved designated parking places. 3. Discussions between TfL, London Councils and Borough Officers have led to the attached draft byelaw. 4. There are currently five dockless bike operators working in London and a sixth may launch before next spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Disabled People's Challenge to the Next Mayor of London
    Mayoral and London Assembly Elections 2016 Disabled People’s Challenge to the next Mayor of London The combined asks of Transport for All, Inclusion London and the Alliance for Inclusive Education 1 Contents Inclusion London 4 Introduction 336 Brixton Road London SW9 7AA The Manifesto: www.inclusionlondon.org.uk 020 7237 3181 6 Equality and Independent Living 13 Accessible Transport Transport for All 16 Inclusive Education 336 Brixton Road London SW9 7AA www.transportforall.org.uk 020 7737 2339 Alliance for Inclusive Education 336 Brixton Road London SW9 7AA www.allfie.org.uk 020 7737 6030 2 3 asking all Mayoral candidates to sign up to. It has been put Introduction together by Inclusion London, Transport for All and the Alliance for Inclusive Education in consultation with our members. There are 1.2 million Disabled people in London1, making DPOs, which are organisations fully run and controlled by up over 14% of the population2, yet we remain one of the Disabled people, are uniquely placed to understand the most marginalised and excluded groups in society. barriers that Disabled Londoners face and the solutions to overcome them. Too often politicians and policy-makers overlook our needs and the issues that matter most to us. We welcome the opportunity of the London Elections 2016 to put issues affecting Disabled Londoners firmly on the In the current climate when, for the first time in the history agenda and look forward to working with the next Mayor of social policy, things are getting worse for Disabled and newly elected GLA members to build a city that is people3, it is more important than ever that our voices equal and inclusive for all.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Election for Mayor of London and London Assembly
    GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY NOTICE OF ELECTION ELECTION OF MAYOR OF LONDON AND LONDON-WIDE MEMBERS OF THE LONDON ASSEMBLY DATE OF THE POLL 1. In the event of a contest, the date of the poll will be Thursday, 6 May 2021. NOMINATION PAPERS 2. Nomination papers to stand in the elections for the Mayor of London and the 11 London-wide Members (party list and individual) of the London Assembly may be obtained from the office of the Greater London Returning Officer, City Hall, The Queen’s Walk, More London, London SE1 2AA on working days between 9am and 4.30pm. Nomination packs can be downloaded at: https://www.londonelects.org.uk/im-candidate/nominations DELIVERY OF NOMINATION PAPERS 3. Completed nomination papers must be delivered in person and hardcopy (not by email) to the Greater London Returning Officer, Committee Room 1, Lower Ground Floor, City Hall, The Queen’s Walk, More London, London SE1 2AA, on any weekday from the date of this notice between 9am and 4.30pm, but by no later than 4pm on Tuesday 30 March 2021. PAYMENT OF DEPOSITS 4. The deposit for each Mayoral candidate is £10,000. The deposit for each party list or individual candidate in the election of London-wide Members is £5,000. Payment should be made by electronic transfer into the GLA Income Account (Royal Bank of Scotland; sort code 16-00-38; account number 00780445). Payment can also be made by cash or bankers draft (banks operating in the UK only). Cleared funds must be received by 4pm on Tuesday 30 March 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance Review
    Supplementary Public Document Pack Resource Allocation Sub (Policy and Resources) Committee Date: FRIDAY, 18 SEPTEMBER 2020 Time: 11.00 am Venue: VIRTUAL MEETING 12. GOVERNANCE REVIEW Report of the Town Clerk. For Decision (Pages 1 - 154) Item received too late for circulation in conjunction with the Agenda. John Barradell Town Clerk and Chief Executive This page is intentionally left blank Agenda Item 12 Committee: Date: Resource Allocation Sub-Committee 18 September 2020 Policy & Resources Committee 24 September 2020 Subject: Public Governance Review Report of: For Decision Town Clerk Summary In September 2019, the Policy and Resources Committee proposed the undertaking of a comprehensive Governance Review of the City Corporation. This proposal, endorsed by the Court of Common Council, recognised that because of the unique and historic nature of the City Corporation it requires good governance to ensure it functions effectively and to the highest possible standards. The Committee was conscious that some potentially contentious issues needed to be addressed and that some radical changes may need to be considered. It was, therefore, agreed that the review should be undertaken independently and Robert Rodgers, The Lord Lisvane, was appointed to conduct the Review, due to his significant expertise and experience. He was encouraged to take a comprehensive and critical “warts and all” look at the totality of the Corporation’s arrangements, without fear or favour, and he has now submitted his findings (attached at Appendix 1). Lord Lisvane’s independent report is detailed and contains more than 90 specific recommendations, together with wider commentary and analysis. These recommendations are far reaching and wide ranging; it is now for Members to consider how far they are appropriate and which should be taken forward.
    [Show full text]
  • V2 COVID-19 Partner Pack
    PARTNER TOOLKIT COVID-19 SUPPORT FOR BUSINESSES AND EMPLOYERS Supported by the Mayor of London, London Growth Hub has launched a new portal to support London-based businesses and employers to manage and mitigate their exposure to COVID-19 (coronavirus). In this toolkit, you will find all the resources needed to help promote this opportunity to your network: About the Programme Page 2 Business Advisers Page 3 Newsletter Copy Page 4 Email Copy Page 5-6 Twitter Posts Page 7 LinkedIn Posts Page 8 Images & Contacts Page 9 Visit the portal at: growthhub.london/covid-19-coronavirus-support-for-businesses-and-employers/ The London Growth Hub programme is part-funded by the European Regional Development Fund and offered to UK registered SME businesses based in any of the 33 boroughs of London. ABOUT London Growth Hub COVID-19 Portal London Growth Hub has brought together essential resources where we will keep businesses up to date with the latest COVID- 19 developments, support and offer access to all the information they need. What does the portal offer? Access to free one-to-one support from an expert business adviser COVID-19 checklists, factsheets and guides Guidance for businesses and employers Information about financial support and schemes Access to useful webinars and virtual events The latest press releases and news articles A short survey to give feedback and help us, and our partners, understand their needs Accessing the portal The portal is freely accessible for all London businesses and employers at: growthhub.london/covid-19-coronavirus-support-for-businesses-and-employers/ Make the change.
    [Show full text]
  • Sadiq Khan Mayor of London City Hall the Queens Walk London SE1
    Rt Hon Robert Jenrick Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government Fry Building 2 Marsham Street London SW1P 4DF Sadiq Khan Tel: 0303 444 3450 Mayor of London Email: [email protected] City Hall The Queens Walk www.gov.uk/mhclg London SE1 2AA. 29 January 2021 Dear Sadiq, London Plan I write further to my letter of 24th December 2020 and in full response to your letter of 21st December 2020 where you sent me your latest Intention to Publish version of your London Plan for my consideration. As you are aware, my officials have been in discussion with your officers on a series of matters since March last year when I first directed you on your emerging London Plan. Intention to Publish Having considered your Intention to Publish version of the plan and the implications of the Supreme Court ruling on the Airports National Policy Statement for your London Plan, I can confirm that I have no further matters to raise with you. However, I would remind you of powers afforded to me under sections 340 and 341 of the GLA Act 1999 (as amended) that allow me to direct you to review or alter your London Plan. Therefore, in order for you to publish the London Plan, in accordance with section 337(8) of the GLA Act 1999, I am formally confirming that the version of the London Plan that you sent to me on 21st December 2020 contains the modifications necessary to conform with all the previously issued directions under section 337 of the GLA Act 1999 (for clarity this includes the Directions issued on both 13th March 2020 and 10th December 2020).
    [Show full text]