DOCSLIB.ORG

Geology of the Crazy Woman Creek Area Johnson County Wyoming

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geology of the Crazy Woman Creek Area Johnson County Wyoming Geology of the Crazy Woman Creek Area Johnson County Wyoming By RICHARD K. HOSE A CONTRIBUTION TO ECONOMIC GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1027-B Prepared as part of a program of the Department of the Interior for development of the Missouri River basin UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1955 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price $1.75 (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract..__ _ _--__-__-______-_-_-__________-__-_-_-____----_____-- 33 Introduction, _____________________________________________________ 35 Location and extent of area_____________________________________ 35 Purpose and scope of report_____-___________-_____--__-____-____ 36 Field work and map compilation. _______________________________ 36 Acknowledgments. ____________________________________________ 36 Previous investigations,________________________________________ 37 Geography______________________________________________________ 38 Surface features.______________________-_______-_---__--------- 38 Water supply and drainage-____________________________________ 40 Climate and vegetation_______________________________________ 42 Accessibility and settlement___-_-___-___-_______-_-_--_____-__-_ 42 Stratigraphy._____________________________________________________ 42 i General features.._______-___-____-__-_-____-___-____-_------_- 42 Location of measured sections..-..-_____________________________ 43 Pre-Cambrian rocks__________________________________________ 43 Paleozoic rocks.--___--______-_-_________-______-__-_-__---_-__ 44 Flathead sandstone._-__-__-_-_-____________--_______---_-_ 44 Gallatin limestone and Gros Ventre formation, undivided_______ 44 Bighorn dolomite-_________________________________________ 45 Madison limestone_______________________________________ 48 Amsden formation,,_______________________________________ 49 Tensleep sandstone._______-________________--___-__---__-_ 49 Permian red shale and gypsum sequence______--___-____-__-- 50 Mesozoic rocks________________________________________________ 51 Chugwater formation. _____________________________________ 51 Gypsum Spring formation__'________________________________ 52 ,, Sundance formation________-___-___---___--__-__--__-_-_--- 54 Morrison formation,_______________________________________ 55 Cleverly formation. _______________________________________ 56 Skull Creek shale________________________________._________ 57 Newcastle sandstone.______________________________________ 58 Mowry shale________________-_-________-___-____-__------- 58 Frontier formation.._______________________________________ 59 Cody shale_______________________________________________ 61 Parkman sandstone._______________________________________ 64 Bearpaw shale. ___________-___________-__-__--__--___--_-- 64 Lance formation.__________________________________________ 65 Cenozoic rocks________________________________________________ 66 Fort Union formation._______________________-_---__--_---- 66 Wasatch formation. _______________________________________ 67 White River formation_________________-____-____-----__--_ 70 Quaternary rocks__________________________________________ 71 in IV CONTENTS Page Structure. _____-_,____-_--____----__-_______________-___---_______ 73 Regional features.,____________________________________________ 73 Folds and faults_________________-_____--______________________ 74 Structural history._____________________________________________ 77 Economic geology.______-_____-_-___---___-_---____-____---____-__ 78 Oil and gas potentialities.________________________________________ 78 Coal_______ ___-_--____-.-_--------_.-_.__-- -__---___._-- 81 General features___________________________________________ 81 Coal in T. 47 N., R. 81 W__________________________________ 83 Coal in T. 48 N., R. 80 W__________________________________ 83 Coal in T. 49 N., R. 80 W__________________________________ 85 Manganese. __________________________________________________ 88 Allanite______________________________________________________ 88 Bentonite_ ___________________________________________'_________ 89 Construction materials.________________________________________ 89 Stratigraphic sections of Mesozoic and Paleozoic rocks. ________________ 91 Literature cited _ __________________________________________________ 114 Index,_________-_____-.______-____________-__-_-----________-____ 117 ILLUSTKATIONS [Plates 6-13 in pocket] PLATE 6. Geologic map and sections showing structure contours of the Crazy Woman Creek area, Johnson County, Wyo. 7. Index map showing location of Crazy Woman Creek area and oil and gas fields in western Powder River Basin. 8. Generalized section of sedimentary units exposed in the Crazy Woman Creek area. 9. Index map and correlation of electric logs of the Skull Creek shale. 10. Correlation diagram of Cretaceous formations of the Black Hills and the Crazy Woman Creek area. 11. Sections of coal beds measured in T. 47 N., R. 81 W. 12. Sections of coal beds measured in T. 48 N., R. 80 W. 13. Sections of coal beds measured in T. 49 N., R. 80 W. FIGURE 13. Index map of Wyoming showing location of the Crazy Woman Page Creek area______-______________-_-____---_________-__ 35 14. View of east flank of the Bighorn Mountains showing promi­ nent piedmont suriaces________________________________ 15. Massive dolomitic part of the Bighorn dolomite. ___________ 16. Contact between the dolomitic and sandstone units of the Bighorn dolomite_-___________-_-_____________________ 46 17. View of the east flank of the Horn at the South Fork Crazy Woman Creek_ ______________________________________ 48 18. Cross section showing unconformable relationship of Gypsum Spring formation to older and younger units in western Powder River Basin __________________________________ 53 19. Cross section showing relationship of Gypsum Spring forma­ tion to older and younger units from the western Wind River Basin__________________________________________ 53 20. Diagram showing the occurrence of faunal zones of the Black Hills region in the Frontier formation-___-_-___-______-_ 60 CONTENTS Page FrouKE 21. Approximate contact between the Kingsbury conglomerate member of the Wasatch formation and the Fort Union formation ___________________________________________ 68 22. Conglomerate of the White River formation on Canyon Fork Powder River________________________________________ 71 23. Gravel of terrace level 2 (Qtg2) on the North Fork Crazy, Woman Creek_________________________________.._ 72 24. View of the abrupt change from moderate to high dips in Paleo­ zoic strata on the North Fork Crazy Woman Creek___--_- 75 25. Geologic map of the Bighorn Mountains showing three major structural segments.__________________________________ 79 26. Generalized section showing average interval between coal beds of T. 47 N., R. 81 W______.__._.____.____.___ __ 82 27. Generalized sections showing average interval between coal beds in Tps. 48 and 49 N., R. 80 W_ ____________________ 85 TABLES Page TABLE 1. Discharge of the North and Middle Forks Crazy Woman Creek, October 1948 to September 1949_.________ _________-___ 41 2. Average annual and monthly precipitation and temperature in the Crazy Woman Creek area____________________________ 41 3. Coal reserves in T. 47 N., R. 81 W___ ______________________ 84 4. Coal reserves in T. 48 N., R. 80 W_ ________________________ 86 5. Coal reserves in T. 49 N., R. 80 W__..__..__._.__...____... 87 6. Spectroscopic analysis of allanite. ___--_-_-__________--_--__ 90 A CONTRIBUTION TO ECONOMIC GEOLOGY GEOLOGY OF THE CRAZY WOMAN CREEK AREA JOHNSON COUNTY, WYOMING By RICHARD K. HOSE ABSTRACT The Crazy Woman Creek area comprises about 576 square miles along the west-central margin of the Powder River Basin and the east-central flank of the Bighorn Mountains in Johnson County, Wyo. Pre-Cambrian granitic rocks form the high rugged core of the Bighorn Mountains. Resistant units of the Paleozoic sequence support the high essentially north-trending scarp along the east flank of the Bighorn Mountains; the softer rocks of the Permian red shale and gypsum sequence and younger units underlie the Powder River Basin. Rocks of every system except the Silurian and Devonian are present in the Crazy Woman Creek area. Paleozoic rocks are as much as 2,550 feet thick and are dominantly of marine origin. Mesozoic rocks attain a maximum thick­ ness of about 9,350 feet and are of marine, brackish water, and nonmarine origin; marine rocks are the most common. The Cenozoic rocks, which have an aggre­ gate thickness of more than 5,000 feet, are wholly of continental origin. The oldest sedimentary unit, the Flathead sandstone of Middle Cambrian age, is about 250 feet thick. It is overlain by the Gros Ventre formation and Gallatin limestone undivided, aggregating 550 feet in thickness and ranging in age from Late Cambrian to Early Ordovician. The next younger unit is the Bighorn dolomite, which ranges in thickness from about 150 to over 350 feet and in age from Middle to Late Ordovician. The 550-foot Madison lime­ stone of early Mississippian age unconformably overlies the Bighorn dolomite. It is succeeded by the Amsden formation of Mississippian (?) and Pennsylvanian age. The Ten sleep sandstone of early Pennsylvanian (Des Moines) age overlies the Amsden formation and is about 350 feet thick. The Tensleep sandstone is overlain by the Permian
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Mid-Cretaceous Rocks in Minnesota and Contiguous Areas
    Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Mid-Cretaceous Rocks in Minnesota and Contiguous Areas GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1253 Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Mid-Cretaceous Rocks in Minnesota and Contiguous Areas By WILLIAM A. COBBAN and E. A. MEREWETHER Molluscan Fossil Record from the Northeastern Part of the Upper Cretaceous Seaway, Western Interior By WILLIAM A. COBBAN Lower Upper Cretaceous Strata in Minnesota and Adjacent Areas-Time-Stratigraphic Correlations. and Structural Attitudes By E. A. M EREWETHER GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1 2 53 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1983 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Cobban, William Aubrey, 1916 Stratigraphy and paleontology of mid-Cretaceous rocks in Minnesota and contiguous areas. (Geological Survey Professional Paper 1253) Bibliography: 52 p. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.16 A. Molluscan fossil record from the northeastern part of the Upper Cretaceous seaway, Western Interior by William A. Cobban. B. Lower Upper Cretaceous strata in Minnesota and adjacent areas-time-stratigraphic correlations and structural attitudes by E. A. Merewether. I. Mollusks, Fossil-Middle West. 2. Geology, Stratigraphic-Cretaceous. 3. Geology-Middle West. 4. Paleontology-Cretaceous. 5. Paleontology-Middle West. I. Merewether, E. A. (Edward Allen), 1930. II. Title. III. Series. QE687.C6 551.7'7'09776 81--607803 AACR2 For sale by the Distribution Branch, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The World at the Time of Messel: Conference Volume
    T. Lehmann & S.F.K. Schaal (eds) The World at the Time of Messel - Conference Volume Time at the The World The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment and the History of Early Primates 22nd International Senckenberg Conference 2011 Frankfurt am Main, 15th - 19th November 2011 ISBN 978-3-929907-86-5 Conference Volume SENCKENBERG Gesellschaft für Naturforschung THOMAS LEHMANN & STEPHAN F.K. SCHAAL (eds) The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment, and the History of Early Primates 22nd International Senckenberg Conference Frankfurt am Main, 15th – 19th November 2011 Conference Volume Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung IMPRINT The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment, and the History of Early Primates 22nd International Senckenberg Conference 15th – 19th November 2011, Frankfurt am Main, Germany Conference Volume Publisher PROF. DR. DR. H.C. VOLKER MOSBRUGGER Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany Editors DR. THOMAS LEHMANN & DR. STEPHAN F.K. SCHAAL Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany [email protected]; [email protected] Language editors JOSEPH E.B. HOGAN & DR. KRISTER T. SMITH Layout JULIANE EBERHARDT & ANIKA VOGEL Cover Illustration EVELINE JUNQUEIRA Print Rhein-Main-Geschäftsdrucke, Hofheim-Wallau, Germany Citation LEHMANN, T. & SCHAAL, S.F.K. (eds) (2011). The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment, and the History of Early Primates. 22nd International Senckenberg Conference. 15th – 19th November 2011, Frankfurt am Main. Conference Volume. Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Frankfurt am Main. pp. 203.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Chronology and Faunal Evolution of the Middle Eocene Bridgerian North American Land Mammal “Age”: Achieving High Precision Geochronology Kaori Tsukui Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2016 © 2015 Kaori Tsukui All rights reserved ABSTRACT Chronology and Faunal Evolution of the Middle Eocene Bridgerian North American Land Mammal “Age”: Achieving High Precision Geochronology Kaori Tsukui The age of the Bridgerian/Uintan boundary has been regarded as one of the most important outstanding problems in North American Land Mammal “Age” (NALMA) biochronology. The Bridger Basin in southwestern Wyoming preserves one of the best stratigraphic records of the faunal boundary as well as the preceding Bridgerian NALMA. In this dissertation, I first developed a chronological framework for the Eocene Bridger Formation including the age of the boundary, based on a combination of magnetostratigraphy and U-Pb ID-TIMS geochronology. Within the temporal framework, I attempted at making a regional correlation of the boundary-bearing strata within the western U.S., and also assessed the body size evolution of three representative taxa from the Bridger Basin within the context of Early Eocene Climatic Optimum. Integrating radioisotopic, magnetostratigraphic and astronomical data from the early to middle Eocene, I reviewed various calibration models for the Geological Time Scale and intercalibration of 40Ar/39Ar data among laboratories and against U-Pb data, toward the community goal of achieving a high precision and well integrated Geological Time Scale. In Chapter 2, I present a magnetostratigraphy and U-Pb zircon geochronology of the Bridger Formation from the Bridger Basin in southwestern Wyoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Nautiloid Shell Morphology
    MEMOIR 13 Nautiloid Shell Morphology By ROUSSEAU H. FLOWER STATEBUREAUOFMINESANDMINERALRESOURCES NEWMEXICOINSTITUTEOFMININGANDTECHNOLOGY CAMPUSSTATION SOCORRO, NEWMEXICO MEMOIR 13 Nautiloid Shell Morphology By ROUSSEAU H. FLOIVER 1964 STATEBUREAUOFMINESANDMINERALRESOURCES NEWMEXICOINSTITUTEOFMININGANDTECHNOLOGY CAMPUSSTATION SOCORRO, NEWMEXICO NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY E. J. Workman, President STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Alvin J. Thompson, Director THE REGENTS MEMBERS EXOFFICIO THEHONORABLEJACKM.CAMPBELL ................................ Governor of New Mexico LEONARDDELAY() ................................................... Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTEDMEMBERS WILLIAM G. ABBOTT ................................ ................................ ............................... Hobbs EUGENE L. COULSON, M.D ................................................................. Socorro THOMASM.CRAMER ................................ ................................ ................... Carlsbad EVA M. LARRAZOLO (Mrs. Paul F.) ................................................. Albuquerque RICHARDM.ZIMMERLY ................................ ................................ ....... Socorro Published February 1 o, 1964 For Sale by the New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources Campus Station, Socorro, N. Mex.—Price $2.50 Contents Page ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Origin and Beyond
    EVOLUTION ORIGIN ANDBEYOND Gould, who alerted him to the fact the Galapagos finches ORIGIN AND BEYOND were distinct but closely related species. Darwin investigated ALFRED RUSSEL WALLACE (1823–1913) the breeding and artificial selection of domesticated animals, and learned about species, time, and the fossil record from despite the inspiration and wealth of data he had gathered during his years aboard the Alfred Russel Wallace was a school teacher and naturalist who gave up teaching the anatomist Richard Owen, who had worked on many of to earn his living as a professional collector of exotic plants and animals from beagle, darwin took many years to formulate his theory and ready it for publication – Darwin’s vertebrate specimens and, in 1842, had “invented” the tropics. He collected extensively in South America, and from 1854 in the so long, in fact, that he was almost beaten to publication. nevertheless, when it dinosaurs as a separate category of reptiles. islands of the Malay archipelago. From these experiences, Wallace realized By 1842, Darwin’s evolutionary ideas were sufficiently emerged, darwin’s work had a profound effect. that species exist in variant advanced for him to produce a 35-page sketch and, by forms and that changes in 1844, a 250-page synthesis, a copy of which he sent in 1847 the environment could lead During a long life, Charles After his five-year round the world voyage, Darwin arrived Darwin saw himself largely as a geologist, and published to the botanist, Joseph Dalton Hooker. This trusted friend to the loss of any ill-adapted Darwin wrote numerous back at the family home in Shrewsbury on 5 October 1836.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyaenodontidae (Creodonta, Mammalia) and the Position of Systematics in Evolutionary Biology
    Hyaenodontidae (Creodonta, Mammalia) and the Position of Systematics in Evolutionary Biology by Paul David Polly B.A. (University of Texas at Austin) 1987 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Paleontology in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA at BERKELEY Committee in charge: Professor William A. Clemens, Chair Professor Kevin Padian Professor James L. Patton Professor F. Clark Howell 1993 Hyaenodontidae (Creodonta, Mammalia) and the Position of Systematics in Evolutionary Biology © 1993 by Paul David Polly To P. Reid Hamilton, in memory. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ix Acknowledgments xi Chapter One--Revolution and Evolution in Taxonomy: Mammalian Classification Before and After Darwin 1 Introduction 2 The Beginning of Modern Taxonomy: Linnaeus and his Predecessors 5 Cuvier's Classification 10 Owen's Classification 18 Post-Darwinian Taxonomy: Revolution and Evolution in Classification 24 Kovalevskii's Classification 25 Huxley's Classification 28 Cope's Classification 33 Early 20th Century Taxonomy 42 Simpson and the Evolutionary Synthesis 46 A Box Model of Classification 48 The Content of Simpson's 1945 Classification 50 Conclusion 52 Acknowledgments 56 Bibliography 56 Figures 69 Chapter Two: Hyaenodontidae (Creodonta, Mammalia) from the Early Eocene Four Mile Fauna and Their Biostratigraphic Implications 78 Abstract 79 Introduction 79 Materials and Methods 80 iv Systematic Paleontology 80 The Four Mile Fauna and Wasatchian Biostratigraphic Zonation 84 Conclusion 86 Acknowledgments 86 Bibliography 86 Figures 87 Chapter Three: A New Genus Eurotherium (Creodonta, Mammalia) in Reference to Taxonomic Problems with Some Eocene Hyaenodontids from Eurasia (With B. Lange-Badré) 89 Résumé 90 Abstract 90 Version française abrégéé 90 Introduction 93 Acknowledgments 96 Bibliography 96 Table 3.1: Original and Current Usages of Genera and Species 99 Table 3.2: Species Currently Included in Genera Discussed in Text 101 Chapter Four: The skeleton of Gazinocyon vulpeculus n.
    [Show full text]
  • (Mammalia) from the French Locality of Aumelas (Hérault), with Possible New Representatives from the Late Ypresian
    geodiversitas 2020 42 13 né – Car ig ni e vo P r e e s n a o f h t p h é e t S C l e a n i r o o z o m i e c – M DIRECTEUR DE LA PUBLICATION / PUBLICATION DIRECTOR: Bruno David, Président du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle RÉDACTEUR EN CHEF / EDITOR-IN-CHIEF : Didier Merle ASSISTANT DE RÉDACTION / ASSISTANT EDITOR : Emmanuel Côtez ([email protected]) MISE EN PAGE / PAGE LAYOUT : Emmanuel Côtez COMITÉ SCIENTIFIQUE / SCIENTIFIC BOARD : Christine Argot (Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris) Beatrix Azanza (Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid) Raymond L. Bernor (Howard University, Washington DC) Alain Blieck (chercheur CNRS retraité, Haubourdin) Henning Blom (Uppsala University) Jean Broutin (Sorbonne Université, Paris, retraité) Gaël Clément (Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris) Ted Daeschler (Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphie) Bruno David (Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris) Gregory D. Edgecombe (The Natural History Museum, Londres) Ursula Göhlich (Natural History Museum Vienna) Jin Meng (American Museum of Natural History, New York) Brigitte Meyer-Berthaud (CIRAD, Montpellier) Zhu Min (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Pékin) Isabelle Rouget (Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris) Sevket Sen (Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, retraité) Stanislav Štamberg (Museum of Eastern Bohemia, Hradec Králové) Paul Taylor (The Natural History Museum, Londres, retraité) COUVERTURE / COVER : Made from the Figures of the article. Geodiversitas est indexé dans / Geodiversitas is indexed in: – Science
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Morphology of the Vertebral Column in Remingtonocetus (Mammalia, Cetacea) and the Evolution of Aquatic Locomotion in Early Archaeocetes
    Functional Morphology of the Vertebral Column in Remingtonocetus (Mammalia, Cetacea) and the Evolution of Aquatic Locomotion in Early Archaeocetes by Ryan Matthew Bebej A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) in The University of Michigan 2011 Doctoral Committee: Professor Philip D. Gingerich, Co-Chair Professor Philip Myers, Co-Chair Professor Daniel C. Fisher Professor Paul W. Webb © Ryan Matthew Bebej 2011 To my wonderful wife Melissa, for her infinite love and support ii Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank each of my committee members. I will be forever grateful to my primary mentor, Philip D. Gingerich, for providing me the opportunity of a lifetime, studying the very organisms that sparked my interest in evolution and paleontology in the first place. His encouragement, patience, instruction, and advice have been instrumental in my development as a scholar, and his dedication to his craft has instilled in me the importance of doing careful and solid research. I am extremely grateful to Philip Myers, who graciously consented to be my co-advisor and co-chair early in my career and guided me through some of the most stressful aspects of life as a Ph.D. student (e.g., preliminary examinations). I also thank Paul W. Webb, for his novel thoughts about living in and moving through water, and Daniel C. Fisher, for his insights into functional morphology, 3D modeling, and mammalian paleobiology. My research was almost entirely predicated on cetacean fossils collected through a collaboration of the University of Michigan and the Geological Survey of Pakistan before my arrival in Ann Arbor.
    [Show full text]
  • Thewissen Et Al. Reply Replying To: J
    NATURE | Vol 458 | 19 March 2009 BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS ARISING Hippopotamus and whale phylogeny Arising from: J. G. M. Thewissen, L. N. Cooper, M. T. Clementz, S. Bajpai & B. N. Tiwari Nature 450, 1190–1194 (2007) Thewissen etal.1 describe new fossils from India that apparentlysupport fossils, Raoellidae or the raoellid Indohyus is more closely related to a phylogeny that places Cetacea (that is, whales, dolphins, porpoises) as Cetacea than is Hippopotamidae (Fig. 1). Hippopotamidae is the the sister group to the extinct family Raoellidae, and Hippopotamidae exclusive sister group to Cetacea plus Raoellidae in the analysis that as more closely related to pigs and peccaries (that is, Suina) than to down-weights homoplastic characters, althoughin the equallyweighted cetaceans. However, our reanalysis of a modified version of the data set analysis, another topology was equally parsimonious. In that topology, they used2 differs in retaining molecular characters and demonstrates Hippopotamidae moved one node out, being the sister group to an that Hippopotamidae is the closest extant family to Cetacea and that Andrewsarchus, Raoellidae and Cetacea clade. In neither analysis is raoellids are the closest extinct group, consistent with previous phylo- Hippopotamidae closer to the pigs and peccaries than to Cetacea, the genetic studies2,3. This topology supports the view that the aquatic result obtained by Thewissen et al.1. In all our analyses, pachyostosis adaptations in hippopotamids and cetaceans are inherited from their (thickening) of limb bones and bottom walking, which occur in hippo- common ancestor4. potamids9,10, are interpreted to have evolved before the pachyostosis of To conduct our analyses, we started with the same published matrix the auditory bulla, as seen in raoellids and cetaceans1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pro-Ostracum and Primordial Rostrum at Early Ontogeny of Lower Jurassic Belemnites from North-Western Germany
    Coleoid cephalopods through time (Warnke K., Keupp H., Boletzky S. v., eds) Berliner Paläobiol. Abh. 03 079-089 Berlin 2003 THE PRO-OSTRACUM AND PRIMORDIAL ROSTRUM AT EARLY ONTOGENY OF LOWER JURASSIC BELEMNITES FROM NORTH-WESTERN GERMANY L. A. Doguzhaeva1, H. Mutvei2 & W. Weitschat3 1Palaeontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences 117867 Moscow, Profsoyuznaya St., 123, Russia, [email protected] 2 Swedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Palaeozoology, S-10405 Stockholm, Sweden, [email protected] 3 Geological-Palaeontological Institute and Museum University of Hamburg, Bundesstrasse 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany, [email protected] ABSTRACT The structure of pro-ostracum and primordial rostrum is presented at early ontogenic stages in Lower Jurassic belemnites temporarily assigned to ?Passaloteuthis from north-western Germany. For the first time the pro-ostracum was observed in the first camerae of the phragmocone. The presence of a pro-ostracum in early shell ontogeny supports Naef”s opinion (1922) that belemnites had an internal skeleton during their entire ontogeny, starting from the earliest post-hatching stages. This interpretation has been previously questioned by several writers. The outer and inner surfaces of the juvenile pro-ostracum were studied. The gross morphology of these surfaces is similar to that at adult ontogenetic stages. Median sections reveal that the pro-ostracum consists of three thin layers: an inner and an outer prismatic layer separated by a fine lamellar, predominantly organic layer. These layers extend from the dorsal side of the conotheca to the ventral side. The information obtained herein confirms the idea that the pro-ostracum represents a structure not present in the shell of ectocochleate cephalopods (Doguzhaeva, 1999, Doguzhaeva et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal and Plant Localities of the Fort Union, Willwood, and Iktman Formations, Southern Bighorn Basin* Wyoming
    Distribution and Stratigraphip Correlation of Upper:UB_ • Ju Paleocene and Lower Eocene Fossil Mammal and Plant Localities of the Fort Union, Willwood, and Iktman Formations, Southern Bighorn Basin* Wyoming U,S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESS IONAL PAPER 1540 Cover. A member of the American Museum of Natural History 1896 expedition enter­ ing the badlands of the Willwood Formation on Dorsey Creek, Wyoming, near what is now U.S. Geological Survey fossil vertebrate locality D1691 (Wardel Reservoir quadran­ gle). View to the southwest. Photograph by Walter Granger, courtesy of the Department of Library Services, American Museum of Natural History, New York, negative no. 35957. DISTRIBUTION AND STRATIGRAPHIC CORRELATION OF UPPER PALEOCENE AND LOWER EOCENE FOSSIL MAMMAL AND PLANT LOCALITIES OF THE FORT UNION, WILLWOOD, AND TATMAN FORMATIONS, SOUTHERN BIGHORN BASIN, WYOMING Upper part of the Will wood Formation on East Ridge, Middle Fork of Fifteenmile Creek, southern Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. The Kirwin intrusive complex of the Absaroka Range is in the background. View to the west. Distribution and Stratigraphic Correlation of Upper Paleocene and Lower Eocene Fossil Mammal and Plant Localities of the Fort Union, Willwood, and Tatman Formations, Southern Bighorn Basin, Wyoming By Thomas M. Down, Kenneth D. Rose, Elwyn L. Simons, and Scott L. Wing U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1540 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert M. Hirsch, Acting Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Map Distribution Box 25286, MS 306, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrate Biostratigraphy of the Eocene Galisteo Formation, North-Central New Mexico Spencer G
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/30 Vertebrate biostratigraphy of the Eocene Galisteo Formation, north-central New Mexico Spencer G. Lucas and Barry S. Kues, 1979, pp. 225-229 in: Santa Fe Country, Ingersoll, R. V. ; Woodward, L. A.; James, H. L.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 30th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 310 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1979 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]