ELIZABETH HAMILTON GRAEME BARRETT the Local Choice for West Wittering Ward Including Birdham, West Itchenor and West Wittering

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

ELIZABETH HAMILTON GRAEME BARRETT the Local Choice for West Wittering Ward Including Birdham, West Itchenor and West Wittering

CHICHESTER DISTRICT COUNCIL ELECTIONS 7 MAY 2015 ELIZABETH HAMILTON GRAEME BARRETT The local choice for West Wittering Ward Including Birdham, West Itchenor and West Wittering Elizabeth Hamilton ([email protected] and 01243 512325 ) moved to Birdham from Easebourne near Midhurst 5 years ago. She had lived there for 38 years serving 20 years on the Parish Council, 8 of these as Chairman. Elizabeth has been District Councillor for Easebourne Ward since 2007 and now hopes to use her experience at CDC to represent the Witterings Ward. As a Birdham parish councillor for the last 2 years, Elizabeth is up to date with current local issues. Having recently retired from running her own business, she now has more time for other activities and asks for your support in the District Council Elections on May 7th. Graeme Barrett ([email protected] and 01243 512180) has been married to Jean for 45 years with 2 sons and has lived in West Sussex for 26 years, of which the last 20 years have been in the Witterings. After graduating with a degree in Physics, Graeme worked until retirement in the Defence Industry. During this period he held senior management engineering posts with major UK and US companies. Graeme has been a District Councillor for over 6 years during which he has supported the communities within and beyond East Wittering Ward, which includes Bracklesham and Earnley. Graeme has taken a very active role in addressing issues relating to the development of the Local Plan and pursued a realistic approach to the housing needs on the Western sector of the Peninsula. Elizabeth & Graeme want: To ensure the voice of the Manhood Peninsula is heard loud and clear at CDC, including preserving our villages and the Chichester Harbour AONB from unnecessary unsuitable urban style development, so preserving the rural feel of the area for tourists, local residents and our descendants. To keep council tax down while ensuring council services are maintained at a time when central governments grants are being reduced. To address the appalling local sewage and drainage problems. Encourage further recycling as a way to ensure our environment and resources are preserved for future generations. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Moving Towards Sustainable Coasts: a Critical Evaluation of a Stakeholder Engagement Group in Successfully Delivering the Mechanism of Adaptive Management
Moving towards sustainable coasts: A critical evaluation of a stakeholder engagement group in successfully delivering the mechanism of adaptive management Creed, R., Baily, B., Potts, J., Bray, M. and Austin, R. University of Portsmouth Department of Geography University of Portsmouth Buckingham Building Lion Terrace Portsmouth PO1 3HE 1 Abstract It is widely recognised that there is a need for direct engagement between stakeholders to establish locally accepted strategies for sustainable coastal management solutions. Adaptive management approaches have emerged as one of the preferred mechanisms in coastal zone management. Central to the application of adaptive management implementation is the effective engagement of stakeholders to encourage a participatory decision-making process. There are relatively few studies which have analysed the effectiveness and dynamics of stakeholder groups to establish sustainable adaptive management in practice and what opportunities and challenges can arise from such collaborative approaches. This research critically evaluates stakeholder engagement in the adoption of adaptive management at East Head, Chichester Harbour, England. The study has identified significant issues and opportunities that have arisen throughout the decision-making process. It has found that a major challenge has been to achieve acceptance of the mechanism of adaptive management, particularly in relation to aspects of uncertainty. It is of critical note that the advisory group in question (EHCIAG) has become a valuable vehicle in bringing together key stakeholders throughout all stages of the adoption of the adaptive management approach. It is suggested that this collaborative approach, has gradually reduced conflict through building knowledge, gaining trust and ultimately achieving acceptance. A management model and recommendations for best practice are presented derived from the views of the advisory group itself which can be applied across a range of scales, situations and environments.
[Show full text]
Grants and Concessions Panel Annual Report Financial Year 2014-15
Grants and Concessions Panel Annual Report Financial Year 2014-15 The Annual Report is intended to enable the Grants and Concessions Panel to document the review of its decisions in the previous year. Contributing to the Council’s commitment to transparency, it is a public document, with the final version made available on the Council’s website. Consideration of the Annual Report by the Grants and Concessions Panel allows for the Panel to make its own amendments to the programme’s Guidance allowing improvements to be made to Grant and Concessions processes, and recommendations back to Cabinet for any changes to Policy. The ‘Priorities and Principles’ of funding, set by the Policy, are the clearest way this Council can communicate to local organisations what it is keen to fund. The Annual Report can also be used to support consideration of any changes to these. 1. Grants During the last financial year, grants have been considered and determined in two ways: - Four Panel meetings considering bids in excess of the Fast track limit were held: . 17 July 2014 . 21 October 2014 . 17 January 2015 . 30 March 2015 - Fast track bids requesting sums up to £500 (increased to £1000 in October 2014) were considered through email exchange by representatives of the Panel. Key figures: Summary figures for grants are outlined in the table below: Total funding £250,000 - 2014/15 financial year (of which £15,000 was allocated available: for Fast Track applications) Agreed in October 2013 to “endeavour to restrict spending to £175,000 to sustain the future of the fund”.
[Show full text]
NOTICE of ELECTION CHICHESTER DISTRICT COUNCIL 2 MAY 2019 1 Elections Are to Be Held of Councillors for the Following Wards
NOTICE OF ELECTION CHICHESTER DISTRICT COUNCIL 2 MAY 2019 1 Elections are to be held of Councillors for the following Wards :- Ward Number of Councillors to be elected CHICHESTER CENTRAL 1 CHICHESTER EAST 2 CHICHESTER NORTH 2 CHICHESTER SOUTH 2 CHICHESTER WEST 2 EASEBOURNE (Parishes of Easebourne, Heyshott and Lodsworth) 1 FERNHURST (Parishes of Fernhurst, Lurgashall, Linch, Linchmere and Milland) 2 FITTLEWORTH (Parishes of Barlavington, Bignor, Bury, Duncton, East Lavington, 1 Fittleworth, Graffham, Stopham and Sutton) GOODWOOD (Parishes of Boxgrove, Eartham, East Dean, Singleton, Upwaltham, West Dean 1 and Westhampnett) HARBOUR VILLAGES (Parishes of Appledram, Bosham, Chidham, Donnington and 3 Fishbourne) HARTING (Parishes of Elsted & Treyford, Harting, Nyewood, Rogate and Trotton) 1 LAVANT (Parishes of Funtington and Lavant) 1 LOXWOOD (Parishes of Ebernoe, Kirdford, Loxwood, Northchapel, Plaistow & Ifold and 2 Wisborough Green) MIDHURST (Parishes of Bepton, Cocking, Midhurst, Stedham with Iping (Iping Ward), 2 Stedham with Iping (Stedham Ward), West Lavington and Woolbedding with Redford) NORTH MUNDHAM AND TANGMERE (Parishes of Hunston, Tangmere, North Mundham and 2 Oving) PETWORTH (Parishes of Petworth and Tillington) 1 SELSEY SOUTH (Parish of Selsey South Ward) 2 SIDDLESHAM WITH SELSEY NORTH (Parishes of Siddlesham and Selsey North Ward) 2 SOUTHBOURNE (Parish of Southbourne) 2 THE WITTERINGS (Parishes of Birdham, Earnley, East Wittering, Itchenor and West 3 Wittering) WESTBOURNE (Parishes of Compton, Marden, Stoughton and Westbourne) 1 2. Nomination papers may be obtained from the Elections Office at East Pallant House, Chichester, and must be delivered there on any day after the date of this notice but not later than 4PM on Wednesday, 3 APRIL 2019.
[Show full text]
Written Evidence Submitted by Richard C. J. Pratt, Environmental Planning Advisor for Save Our South Coast Alliance
Save Our South Coast Alliance WQR0024 Written evidence submitted by Richard C. J. Pratt, Environmental Planning Advisor for Save Our South Coast Alliance Sewage and other Polluting Discharges to Solent Harbours We are submitting evidence for a group of individuals called Save Our South Coast Alliance (https://www.sosca.org.uk/). This alliance has affiliates across parishes surrounding the Eastern Solent i.e. west and south of Chichester. Summary Conclusions from the evidence in the following paper a. How effective are the planning policy and standards around sustainable drainage systems to reduce urban diffuse pollution in England? At present it is not effective as infrastructure investment lags far behind consented new developments and water companies have historically underinvested in future growth and left inadequate historical systems. b. Should local authorities and highways agencies be given a duty to prevent pollution to watercourses without prior treatment? LA should be given direct control c. How effective is Ofwat’s remit and regulation of water companies? Does it facilitate sufficient investment in improvements to treat water quality, including sustainable drainage system outflows and nature-based solutions such as constructed wetlands? The experience of Chichester does not bode well. d. Is adequate investment being made in adapting water treatment systems to future climate change? No. Currently in the Chichester District we have half a dozen Waste Water Treatment Works very close to High Water Spring Tides levels with a local plan proposing many hundred more connections. In addition we are facing wetter winters and drier summers. e. How could the designation of inland bathing waters by water companies affect the costs of achieving the associated water quality standards? The bathing water designated areas have not kept up with all the new places where people now do wild swimming summer and winter.
[Show full text]
South Hayling to East Head
www.gov.uk/englandcoastpath England Coast Path Stretch: South Hayling to East Head Report SHE 5: West Itchenor to West Wittering Beach Part 5.1: Introduction Start Point: West Itchenor (grid reference: 479960, 101445) End Point: West Wittering Beach (grid reference: 477201, 097828) Relevant Maps: SHE 5a to SHE 5d 5.1.1 This is one of a series of linked but legally separate reports published by Natural England under section 51 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949, which make proposals to the Secretary of State for improved public access along and to this stretch of coast between South Hayling and East Head 5.1.2 This report covers length SHE 5 of the stretch, which is the coast between West Itchenor and West Wittering Beach. It makes free-standing statutory proposals for this part of the stretch, and seeks approval for them by the Secretary of State in their own right under section 52 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949. 5.1.3 The report explains how we propose to implement the England Coast Path (“the trail”) on this part of the stretch, and details the likely consequences in terms of the wider ‘Coastal Margin’ that will be created if our proposals are approved by the Secretary of State. Our report also sets out: any proposals we think are necessary for restricting or excluding coastal access rights to address particular issues, in line with the powers in the legislation; and any proposed powers for the trail to be capable of being relocated on particular sections (“roll- back”), if this proves necessary in the future because of coastal change.
[Show full text]
The Old Nursery West Wittering, Chichester, West Sussex the Old Nursery Area and the Adjoining Family Room, a Striking Two- Sided Gas-Fired Concrete Resin Fireplace
The Old Nursery West Wittering, Chichester, West Sussex The Old Nursery area and the adjoining family room, a striking two- sided gas-fired concrete resin fireplace. A door Chapel Lane, West Wittering, from the kitchen leads into a large utility/laundry Chichester, West Sussex, room with plentiful storage, doors outside and to cloakroom/beach shower room and through PO20 8QG to the entrance hall. The accommodation wing comprises a principal bedroom suite with walk-in A spectacular modern dressing room and en-suite bathroom, three further detached house set in about interconnecting bedrooms and a family bathroom. 1.6 acres in a rural location in Outside The Old Nursery is approached from Chapel West Wittering Lane down a long drive leading into an expansive gravelled parking area and to the detached garage West Wittering beach 1.7 miles, Itchenor Sailing outbuilding, which has planning permission for part Club 2 miles, Chichester train station 6 miles, to be used as an office/family room and cloakroom Goodwood 11 miles, London 70 miles (Application 12/02284). There is an additional detached timber clad outbuilding, currently used as Entrance hall | Stunning open plan reception a home office and store. The gardens lie mainly to room with bespoke kitchen | Family room | Utility the rear of the property. Well enclosed with dense room | Cloakroom/beach shower room | Four hedging, the private gardens are mainly laid to lawn double bedrooms, one with en-suite bathroom with shrubs, fine mature trees and a meadow to the Family bathroom | Detached garage outbuilding south and southeast of the plot.
[Show full text]
Highleigh, Nr Chichester, West Sussex Todansteehancock.Com 01243 523723 Highleigh, Nr Chichester, West Sussex
Highleigh, nr Chichester, West Sussex todansteehancock.com 01243 523723 Highleigh, nr Chichester, West Sussex A superbly presented brick and flint detached cottage, stylishly renovated throughout, and located within an attractive semi-rural hamlet equidistant of both Chichester Marina, Pagham Harbour and the beaches at West Wittering. open plan kitchen/dining room | sitting room | 3 bedrooms (2 en suite) | 1 further shower room | utility room | cloakroom garden | off street parking Distances & Transport: Chichester Marina: 3.5 miles | West Wittering: 5 miles | Itchenor: 4 miles Chichester Station: 4 miles | Southampton Airport: 36 miles Gatwick Airport: 50 miles | Central London: 70 miles Description: by rare wildlife and designated an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. East Wittering is about 3 miles distant Converted from a former stable building with further and has an excellent variety of shops and restaurants extensions, this most attractive cottage provides including a health centre, dentist and library. The historic contemporary living accompanied with period charm. cathedral city of Chichester offers comprehensive Features include underfloor heating, open-plan kitchen/ shopping facilities and a choice of social and recreational dining room with bespoke units and Neff appliances, a activities, all of which are easily accessible through the bright dual aspect sitting room with patio doors leading mainly level pedestrian areas of the beautifully preserved onto a south-facing terrace ideal for entertaining, utility city. Cultural activities include the Pallant House Gallery room, ground floor shower/wet room and large study/third and Festival Theatre. There are renowned schools in bedroom. From the entrance hall (with limestone flooring), the area, both in the public and the private sector.
[Show full text]
West Sussex County Council Attachments: UA Report Appendix 2 Consultation Response.Docx
Kingsley, Paul From: Charles Gauntlett > Sent: 10 March 2016 14:04 To: Philip Coleman Cc: reviews Subject: Chichester District Council Boundary Review - Comments from West Sussex County Council Attachments: UA report appendix 2 consultation response.docx Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Dear Philip, The County Council has considered Chichester District Council’s work on its electoral boundary review. It has focussed on Chichester District Council’s proposed scheme and has answered the questions in the consultation document. The County Council also makes a general comment about how it hopes that the Commission may adopt whole county reviews in future, if the pilot in East Sussex is successful, to give more chance of having better levels of co-terminosity between a county and districts. Kind regards, Charles Charles Gauntlett | Senior Advisor – Council and Member Support, West Sussex County Council | Location: This email and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the persons addressed. If it has come to you in error please reply to advise us but you should not read it, copy it, show it to anyone else nor make any other use of its content. West Sussex County Council takes steps to ensure emails and attachments are virus-free but you should carry out your own checks before opening any attachment. 1 Response to Boundary Review Consultation from West Sussex County Council West Sussex County Council has considered Chichester District Council’s Electoral Review 2016 Consultation Document and has agreed the following response to the consultation questions and also made some general comments regarding the proposals.
[Show full text]
About West Sussex
Introduction About West Sussex Geography Environment 6 Geography of the county 29 Sustainability 30 Carbon emissions This edition of West Sussex Life Demographics 31 Renewable energy 9 Population 33 Energy consumption has four sections, three of which 10 Projected population 35 Fuel poverty are aligned with the three core 12 Population density 37 Waste disposal 13 Population change 39 Composition of waste priorities in the Future West 14 Country of birth, ethnicity 41 Mineral extraction Sussex Plan: and refugees 43 Natural environment 15 Religion and language 16 Marital status Health and wellbeing • Giving children the best 17 Internal migration 46 Physical activity 47 Obesity start in life Voting and elections 48 Drugs and alcohol • Championing the local 18 2015 General Election 50 Smoking 19 2016 EU Referendum 51 Sexual health economy 20 District councils 53 Statutory homelessness • Independent for longer in 21 West Sussex County 56 Rough sleepers Council 57 Mental health later life 59 Learning disabilities Transport 60 Personal wellbeing 23 Railways This first section contains 24 Road network and traffic Community safety information on a variety of flows 61 Recorded crime Sussex West About 25 Road casualties and bus 64 Restorative Justice subjects that are relevant to the transport 66 Domestic abuse county’s population as a whole. 26 National Transport Survey 69 Sexual offences 27 Highways enquiries 72 Hate incidents and crime 28 Cycle paths 74 Fire and rescue Section Contents [email protected] West Sussex County Council
[Show full text]
Parking Zone Allocations: Wards in District Or Borough
Hillside Buckingham Manor Peverel Cokeham Southlands St. Nicolas Mash Barn St. Mary's Southwick Green Eastbrook Marine Widewater Churchill Legend Zone 1 (1) Zone 2 (4) Zone 3 (2) Zone 4 (7) Zone 5 (0) Reproduced from or based upon 2019 Ordnance Survey mapping with permission of the Controller of HMSO © Crown Copyright reserved. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to Regional Parking Zone Allocation: Adur District - Appendix C-1 prosecution or civil proceedings West Sussex County Council Licence No. 100023447 1:30,000 ± Arundel & Walberton Angmering & Findon Barnham Ferring Courtwick with Toddington Brookfield Yapton East Preston Felpham East River Beach Rustington West Bersted Rustington East Middleton-on-Sea Hotham Pevensey Orchard Felpham West Pagham Marine Aldwick East Aldwick West Legend Zone 1 (2) Zone 2 (13) Zone 3 (0) Zone 4 (8) Zone 5 (0) Reproduced from or based upon 2019 Ordnance Survey mapping with permission of the Controller of HMSO © Crown Copyright reserved. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to Regional Parking Zone Allocation: Arun District - Appendix C-2 prosecution or civil proceedings West Sussex County Council Licence No. 100023447 1:80,000 ± Fernhurst Loxwood Petworth Easebourne Harting Midhurst Fittleworth Westbourne Goodwood Lavant Chichester North Chichester West Chichester East Chichester Central Chichester South Southbourne Harbour Villages North Mundham & Tangmere The Witterings Sidlesham with Selsey North Legend Selsey South Zone 1 (13) Zone 2 (3) Zone 3 (2) Zone 4 (0) Zone 5 (3) Reproduced from or based upon 2019 Ordnance Survey mapping with permission of the Controller of HMSO © Crown Copyright reserved. Regional Parking Zone Allocation Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings West Sussex County Council Licence No.
[Show full text]
Consultation Response to Chichester District Council's Electoral
Appendix 2 Response to Boundary Review Consultation from West Sussex County Council West Sussex County Council has considered Chichester District Council’s Electoral Review 2016 Consultation Document and has agreed the following response to the consultation questions and also made some general comments regarding the proposals. Question 1: We agree that Shopwhyke Lakes should be included in Oving ward. Question 2: We agree that Chichester City should be dealt with as a separate unit and that district ward boundaries should not cross the city boundary. Question 3: Our preference is for option 2, with a single-member ward for Sidlesham (comprising the village and the northern edge of Selsey) and a three- member ward for the core community of Selsey. The proposed County Council division puts Sidlesham in with the Witterings, so it will be better for a single member Sidlesham district ward to be 100% within the County Wtterings division. Question 5: On balance, our preference is for option 2. We acknowledge that whilst the western end of East Wittering/Bracklesham Bay is within West Wittering Parish, residents are oriented to the community facilities of East Wittering. Question 6: No view Question 7: In general, we have a preference for single member wards; however we recognise in this case that owing to the variance a two-member ward is preferable. Question 8: In our view, either option is preferable to a ward that is over 15% above the norm. On balance, our preference is for option 1, as this would keep the defined community of Fishbourne intact. Question 9: our preference is for Westbourne as the ward name.
[Show full text]
Pieter Montyn, Both of Chichester Conservative Association, St John’S House, St John’S Street, Chichester, PO19 1UU Printed by Solopress, Southend on Sea, SS2 5QF
community your and you for working Conservatives Working to alleviate visitor parking visitor alleviate to Working solution term long a supporting safety road Improving bypass: Chichester protection. its to committed is he and, as a County Council member of the Chichester Harbour Conservancy, Conservancy, Harbour Chichester the of member Council County a as and, harbours harbours Conservation Authority. Having first sailed in Chichester Harbour in the 80s 80s the in Harbour Chichester in sailed first Having Authority. Conservation precious precious Flood Coastal Committee and of the Sussex Inshore Fisheries and and Fisheries Inshore Sussex the of and Committee Coastal Flood two our On behalf of the County Council he is a member of the Southern Regional Regional Southern the of member a is he Council County the of behalf On discharges at at discharges sewage unwanted unwanted stages. early its in scheme realignment recognised. are capacity issue of of issue been closely involved in planning matters including the Medmerry Medmerry the including matters planning in involved closely been pressures on roads and sewage sewage and roads on pressures Raising the the Raising He has also also has He issues. local out sorting for known well become has Pieter and Parish Councils to ensure that the the that ensure to Councils Parish and continue to work with planning officers officers planning with work to continue Peninsula. increasing public concern. Pieter will will Pieter concern. public increasing highways, all matters of great importance for
[Show full text]