Appendix 4.5 Citizenship of Justice Claudio Teehankee Sr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

APPENDIX 4.5 CITIZENSHIP OF JUSTICE CLAUDIO TEEHANKEE SR. 479 Kasarinlan: Philippine Journal of Third World Studies 2012–13 (27–28): 479–484 APPENDIX 4.5 CITIZENSHIP OF JUSTICE CLAUDIO TEEHANKEE SR. In 1982, the justices of the Supreme Court resigned in toto because chief justice Enrique Fernando had authorized the adjustment of the bar exam score of Gustavo Ericta, son of justice Vicente Ericta, thus giving the younger Ericta a passing mark. Majority of the justices—even constant dissenter Justice Claudio Teehankee Sr.—were reinstated. However, the issue of Teehankee’s citizenship—which had cropped up before when he was to be appointed by Ferdinand Marcos as undersecretary in the department of justice—was resurrected while Teehankee’s reappointment was in process. After resolving the issue twice before, the issue was raised again, apparently by Marcos himself, when Teehankee was up for consideration for the position of chief justice given his seniority (see Reed 1985). This suggests that Marcos was perfectly comfortable with Teehankee being the Court’s token dissenter, but he could not tolerate having the Court’s primus inter pares be an opponent of his regime. Reference Reed, Jack. 1985. “Marcos Orders Probe of Supreme Court Member.” United Press International, 9 May. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1985/05/09/Marcos-orders- probe-of-Supreme-Court-member/4023484459200. Source Presidential Commission on Good Government Files (through Meynardo Mendoza and the National Historical Commission of the Philippines), Roll No. 257, File Nos. 1442–3 and 1483–85. 480 KASARINLAN VOL. 27 (2012)–VOL. 28 (2013) APPENDIX 4.5 CITIZENSHIP OF JUSTICE CLAUDIO TEEHANKEE SR. 481 482 KASARINLAN VOL. 27 (2012)–VOL. 28 (2013) APPENDIX 4.5 CITIZENSHIP OF JUSTICE CLAUDIO TEEHANKEE SR. 483 484 KASARINLAN VOL. 27 (2012)–VOL. 28 (2013).

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The 1986 EDSA Revolution? These Are Just Some of the Questions That You Will Be Able to Answer As You Study This Module
What Is This Module About? “The people united will never be defeated.” The statement above is about “people power.” It means that if people are united, they can overcome whatever challenges lie ahead of them. The Filipinos have proven this during a historic event that won the admiration of the whole world—the 1986 EDSA “People Power” Revolution. What is the significance of this EDSA Revolution? Why did it happen? If revolution implies a struggle for change, was there any change after the 1986 EDSA Revolution? These are just some of the questions that you will be able to answer as you study this module. This module has three lessons: Lesson 1 – Revisiting the Historical Roots of the 1986 EDSA Revolution Lesson 2 – The Ouster of the Dictator Lesson 3 – The People United Will Never Be Defeated What Will You Learn From This Module? After studying this module, you should be able to: ♦ identify the reasons why the 1986 EDSA Revolution occurred; ♦ describe how the 1986 EDSA Revolution took place; and ♦ identify and explain the lessons that can be drawn from the 1986 EDSA Revolution. 1 Let’s See What You Already Know Before you start studying this module, take this simple test first to find out what you already know about this topic. Read each sentence below. If you agree with what it says, put a check mark (4) under the column marked Agree. If you disagree with what it says, put a check under the Disagree column. And if you’re not sure about your answer, put a check under the Not Sure column.
[Show full text]
Papal Visit Philippines 2014 and 2015 2014
This event is dedicated to the Filipino People on the occasion of the five- day pastoral and state visit of Pope Francis here in the Philippines on October 23 to 27, 2014 part of 22- day Asian and Oceanian tour from October 22 to November 13, 2014. Papal Visit Philippines 2014 and 2015 ―Mercy and Compassion‖ a Papal Visit Philippines 2014 and 2015 2014 Contents About the project ............................................................................................... 2 About the Theme of the Apostolic Visit: ‗Mercy and Compassion‘.................................. 4 History of Jesus is Lord Church Worldwide.............................................................................. 6 Executive Branch of the Philippines ....................................................................... 15 Presidents of the Republic of the Philippines ....................................................................... 15 Vice Presidents of the Republic of the Philippines .............................................................. 16 Speaker of the House of Representatives of the Philippines ............................................ 16 Presidents of the Senate of the Philippines .......................................................................... 17 Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines ...................................................... 17 Leaders of the Roman Catholic Church ................................................................ 18 Pope (Roman Catholic Bishop of Rome and Worldwide Leader of Roman
[Show full text]
Producing Rizal: Negotiating Modernity Among the Filipino Diaspora in Hawaii
PRODUCING RIZAL: NEGOTIATING MODERNITY AMONG THE FILIPINO DIASPORA IN HAWAII A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN ASIAN STUDIES AUGUST 2014 By Ai En Isabel Chew Thesis Committee: Patricio Abinales, Chairperson Cathryn Clayton Vina Lanzona Keywords: Filipino Diaspora, Hawaii, Jose Rizal, Modernity, Rizalista Sects, Knights of Rizal 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………..…5 Chapter 1 Introduction: Rizal as a Site of Contestation………………………………………………………………………………………....6 Methodology ..................................................................................................................18 Rizal in the Filipino Academic Discourse......................................................................21 Chapter 2 Producing Rizal: Interactions on the Trans-Pacific Stage during the American Colonial Era,1898-1943…………………………..………………………………………………………...29 Rizal and the Philippine Revolution...............................................................................33 ‘Official’ Productions of Rizal under American Colonial Rule .....................................39 Rizal the Educated Cosmopolitan ..................................................................................47 Rizal as the Brown Messiah ...........................................................................................56 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................66
[Show full text]
Defeating Revisionism, Reformism and Opportunism
Jose Ma. Sison (Amado Guerrero) Defeating Revisionism, Reformism and Opportunism Selected Writings, 1969 to 1974 International Network for Philippine Studies The Netherlands and Aklat ng Bayan, Inc. Philippines Copyright © 2013 by International Network for Philippine Studies (INPS) Published by International Network for Philippine Studies (INPS) and Aklat ng Bayan, Inc. ISBN 978-1-62847-921-8 Cover design by Janos J.L.L. Sison Book design by Alvin Firmeza Contents Editor's Note ix Author's Preface 1 Carry the Struggle against Modern Revisionism through to the End 5 The Lava Revisionist Renegades Are Counterrevolutionaries 7 On the Reformists 11 A Seminar of Landlords on "Land Reform" 11 Masaka Factions Quarrel over Ople 11 Soviet Social-Imperialists Cooperate with US in Defence-Aerospace Program 12 The Treachery of Taruc as a Negative Example 15 Taruc-Sumulong Gangster Clique Is Desperately Isolated 25 Fake Controversy Concocted to Obscure Fundamental Issues in Church 27 Reformist Organizations Beg for Land Reform from Reactionary Government 29 Reactionary "Labor" Confederations "Unite" behind Management and Marcos 33 Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation, Inc. Admits It Enjoys State Protection 35 Expose and Oppose the Vicious Crimes of the Monkees-Armeng Bayan-Masaka (Lava) Gang 39 On the Counterrevolutionary Line of the Lava Revisionist Renegades 43 On the Movement for the Advancement of Nationalism 51 Against the Wishful Thinking of a Revisionist Puppet of US Imperialism 59 I. Capitulation to US Imperialism and the Domestic Ruling System 59 II. Abandonment of Revolutionary Struggle 67 On the Pretended Capture of Sumulong 77 On the Philippine Business for Social Progress 79 Cast Away the Labor Aristocrats! 83 Kidnapping and Murder of Carlos B.
[Show full text]
Martial Law and the Communist Parties of the Philippines, 1959–1974
Crisis of Revolutionary Leadership: Martial Law and the Communist Parties of the Philippines, 1959–1974 By Joseph Paul Scalice A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in South and Southeast Asian Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Associate Professor Jerey Hadler, Chair Professor Peter Zinoman Professor Andrew Barshay Summer 2017 Crisis of Revolutionary Leadership: Martial Law and the Communist Parties of the Philippines, 1957-1974 Copyright 2017 by Joseph Paul Scalice 1 Abstract Crisis of Revolutionary Leadership: Martial Law and the Communist Parties of the Philippines, 1959–1974 by Joseph Paul Scalice Doctor of Philosophy in South and Southeast Asian Studies University of California, Berkeley Associate Professor Jerey Hadler, Chair In 1967 the Partido Komunista ng Pilipinas (pkp) split in two. Within two years a second party – the Communist Party of the Philippines (cpp) – had been founded. In this work I argue that it was the political program of Stalinism, embodied in both parties through three basic principles – socialism in one country, the two-stage theory of revolution, and the bloc of four classes – that determined the fate of political struggles in the Philippines in the late 1960s and early 1970s and facilitated Marcos’ declaration of Martial Law in September 1972. I argue that the split in the Communist Party of the Philippines was the direct expression of the Sino-Soviet split in global Stalinism. The impact of this geopolitical split arrived late in the Philippines because it was initially refracted through Jakarta.
[Show full text]
The Philippines: Human Rights After Martial Law
THE PHILIPPINES: HUMAN RIGHTS AFTER MARTIAL LAW Report of a Mission by Professor Virginia Leary, United States Mr A.A. Ellis, QC, New Zealand Dr Kurt Madlener, Fédéral Republic of Germany THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION OF JURISTS Geneva, Switzerland MEMBERS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION OF JURISTS KEBA MBAYE Judge of Int’l Court of Justice; former Près. Supreme (Président) Court, Sénégal, and UN Commission on Human Rights ROBERTO CONCEPCION Former Chief Justice, Philippines (Vice-President) HELENO CLAUDIO FRAGOSO Advocate; Professor of Pénal Law, Rio de Janeiro (Vice-President) JOHN P. HUMPHREY Prof, of Law, Montréal; former Director, UN Human (Vice-President) Rights Division ANDRES AGUILAR MAWDSLEY Prof, of Law, Venezuela; former Près. Inter-American Commission BADRIA AL-AWADHI Dean, Faculty of Law and Sharia, Univ. of Kuwait ALPHONSE BONI Président of Supreme Court of Ivory Coast WILLIAM J. BUTLER Attorney at law, New York RAUL F. CARDENAS Advocate; Prof, of Criminal Law, Mexico HAIM H. COHN Former Supreme Court Judge, Israël AUGUSTO CONTE-MACDONELL Advocate; member of Parliament, Argentina TASLIM OLAWALE ELIAS Près., Int’l Court of Justice; former Chief Justice of Nigeria ALFREDO ETCHEBERRY Advocate; Professor of Law, University of Chile GUILLERMO FIGALLO Former Member of Supreme Court of Peru LORD GARDINER Former Lord Chancellor of England P. TELFORD GEORGES Chief Justice, Supreme Court, The Bahamas LOUIS JOXE Ambassador of France; former Minister of State P.J.G. KAPTEYN Councillor of State, Netherlands; former Prof, of Int’l Law MICHAEL D. KIRBY Judge, Fédéral Court of Australia KINUKO KUBOTA Former Prof, of Constitutional Law, Japan RAJSOOMER LALLAH Judge of the Supreme Court, Mauritius TAI-YOUNG LEE Director, Korean Légal Aid Centre for Family Relations SEAN MACBRIDE Former Irish Minister of External Affairs RUDOLF MACHACEK Member of Constitutional Court, Austria J.R.W.S.
[Show full text]
Philippine Bar Examination
Philippine Bar Examination . 12.1.1 Presidents and Vice- Presidents From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia . 12.1.2 Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Justices The Philippine Bar Examination is the professional . 12.1.3 Senators and Representatives licensure examination for lawyers in the Philippines. 12.1.4 Appointees and career service officials 12.1.5 Local officials It is the only professional licensure exam in the . 12.1.6 Academe country that is not supervised by the Professional . 12.1.7 Private sector Regulation Commission. The exam is exclusively . administered by the Supreme Court of the Philippines 13 1st place in the Philippine Bar Examinations through the Supreme Court Bar Examination Committee. 14 External links 15 See also Contents 16 References 1 Brief history Brief history 2 Admission requirements The first Philippine Bar Exams was given in 1903 but 3 Committee of Bar Examiners the results were released in 1905. Jose I. Quintos 4 Bar review programs obtained the highest rating of 96.33%, Sergio Osmena, 5 Venue and itinerary Sr. was second with 95.66%, F. Salas was third with 6 Coverage 94.5% and Manuel L.Quezon fourth with 87.83%. The 7 Grading system first bar exam was held in 1903, with 13 examinees, o 7.1 Passing average vs. Passing rate while the 2008 bar examination is the 107th (given o 7.2 Passing Percentage (1978-2012) per Article 8, Section 5, 1987 Constitution). The o 7.3 Law school passing rates 2001 bar exam had the highest number of passers—1,266 o 7.4 Role of the Supreme Court, Criticisms out of 3,849 examinees, or 32.89%, while 2006 had the o 7.5 Bar topnotchers highest examinees -.6,187.
[Show full text]
1.1 Introduction
CHAPTER ONE TO DEFER OR TO DEFY: JUDICIAL CONTROL IN INSECURE ENVIRONMENTS All judges are politicians, whether they know it or not. --- Enrique Petracchi 1.1 Introduction When do judges rein in those who reign? In a given polity, the judiciary has the crucial task of rendering verdicts on disputes and social questions fairly; insensible to considerations of power and prestige. The courts are expected to subject even those who rule to the governance of rules (Fuller 1964; Shapiro 1981). However, those who have dominion over the state can employ a variety of weaponry to bend the gavel to their will: They can refuse to implement judicial rulings, cut the court’s jurisdiction, reduce the budget allotted to the court, impeach the magistrates or subject the judges to physical harm. These threats are particularly compelling in authoritarian societies where judges do not enjoy the institutional safeguards or the popular support that protect their counterparts in democratic polities. Thus, it becomes most relevant to ask: When do judges invalidate actions of government? Why do gavels defy the gun? The objective of this dissertation is to identify the conditions that enable the robe to overturn state action at the risk of incurring the wrath of the sword. The judicial literature has focused mostly on court behavior within highly developed democracies (Guarnieri and Pederzoli 2002; Koopmans 2003). In these polities, the courts 1 have emerged as powerful, independent actors in the public policy process. Empirical studies demonstrated that institutional protections like security of tenure and fiscal autonomy, as well as public support, have allowed judiciaries in developed societies to effectively constrain governmental behavior.
[Show full text]
The AQUINO MANAGEMENT of the PRESIDENCY
The AQUINO MANAGEMENT Of The PRESIDENCY IN THE FACE OF CRISIS Published by the Presidential Management Staff Office of the President Manila, Philippines June 1992 "Arm-chair critics and destabilizers have asked - can we survive despite all the problems that we suffer? My answer is definite yes! Yes, we will survive despite natural calamities, destabilization campaigns, insurgency, international crises and scathing criticism from those who should be talking less and working more. With full confidence in our people's resolve to sustain this freedom, we will survive. And we will grow". President Corazon C. Aquino Philippine League of Councilors First National Congress September 7, 1990 _________________________ INTRODUCTION THIS VOLUME OF The Aquino Management of the Presidency series seeks to document how President Corazon C. Aquino, the members of the Cabinet, and her closest advisers managed the crisis situations that confronted the Aquino governrnent. Not all the crisis situations are covered. The focus is on the seven putsches and related events which threatened the existence of the government or the unity of the armed forces. Chapter 1, entitled 'The Coup Attempts That Failed", covers crisis situations which started with the takeover of the Manila Hotel by the Marcos loyalists on July 6 to 7, barely four months after President Aquino assumed office, up to Black Saturday, April 18, 1987, when a band of rebel soldiers took over the Philippine Army headquarters. These were the jabs, as in boxing. Chapter 2, entitled 'The Military Putsches That Almost Succeeded", covers the punches: the bloody August 28, 1987 and the near fatal December 1989 coup attempts.
[Show full text]
Ferdinand Marcos: Apotheosis of the Philippine Historical Political Tradition
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Undergraduate Humanities Forum 2008-09: Penn Humanities Forum Undergraduate Change Research Fellows 4-2009 FERDINAND MARCOS: APOTHEOSIS OF THE PHILIPPINE HISTORICAL POLITICAL TRADITION Nicole Cu Unjieng niversity of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/uhf_2009 Part of the History Commons Unjieng, Nicole Cu, "FERDINAND MARCOS: APOTHEOSIS OF THE PHILIPPINE HISTORICAL POLITICAL TRADITION" (2009). Undergraduate Humanities Forum 2008-09: Change. 14. https://repository.upenn.edu/uhf_2009/14 2008-2009 Penn Humanities Forum on Change Undergraduate Mellon Research Fellows http://humanities.sas.upenn.edu/08-09/fellows_uhf.shtml This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/uhf_2009/14 For more information, please contact [email protected]. FERDINAND MARCOS: APOTHEOSIS OF THE PHILIPPINE HISTORICAL POLITICAL TRADITION Abstract Nicole E. CuUnjieng, College '09, History The Regime of Ferdinand Marcos and the Role of the Supreme Court of the Philippines My research centers on the Philippine political tradition and contextualizing President Ferdinand Marcos's 1972-1986 dictatorship within that perspective. I wish to intervene within the existing academic debate on the nature of this tradition. Challenging the established scholarship, which presents Marcos's regime as the anomaly of the Philippine patronage system, I instead argue that Marcos is the perverse apotheosis of the system. I wish to argue that Marcos embodies all the ills already present in Philippine politics and merely brings them to their extreme conclusion. More recent scholars have also championed this reading and I wish to further develop the argument by examining the legitimizing role that the judiciary played in this history.
[Show full text]
President's Daily Diary Collection (Box 78A) at the Gerald R
Scanned from the President's Daily Diary Collection (Box 78A) at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE THE DAILY DIARY OF PRESIDENT GERALD R. FORD PLACE DAY BEGAN DATE (Mo., Day, Yr.) WISMA NEGRA DECEMBER 6, 1975 JAKARTA, ~NDONESIA TIME DAY 8:00 a.m. SATURDAY TIME '0 :P ~ u ACTIVITY 1----_-----1 0::U ~II In Out ... '" The President and the First Lady were overnight guests at the Wisma Negra, Jakarta, Indonesia. 8:00 8:05 The President walked from the Wisma Negra to the Istana Merdeka (Credential Hall). He was accompanied by Adam Malik, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia. 8:05 The President was greeted· by President of the Republic of Indonesia Suharto. 8:05 The President and President Suharto went to the Jeapara Room. 8:05 9:30 The President met with: President Suharto Foreign Minister Malik Henry A. Kissinger, Secretary of State Members of the press, in/out 9 :30 The President and President Suharto went to Credential Hall. 9:33 9:40 The President walked from the Istana Merdeka to the Wisma Negra. He was accompanied by Widya Latief, Chief of Protocol of the Republic of Indonesia. 9:40 The President returned to his private quarters. 10:15 10:20 The President walked from the Wisma Negra to the Istana Merdeka. 10:20 10:30 The President introduced members of the U.S. official party to President Suharto. For a list of attendees, see APPENDIX "A." Members of the press, in/out 10:30 The President went to his motorcade.
[Show full text]
Disregarding the Rule of Law in Estrada V
LEGITIMIZING THE ILLEGITIMATE: DISREGARDING THE RULE OF LAW IN ESTRADA V. DESIERTO * AND ESTRADA V. MACAPAGAL-ARROYO * SABRINA M. QUERUBIN ANA RHIA T. MUHI CHARISSE F. GONZALES-OLALIA “Lust of power is the most flagrant of all passions.” - Tacitus1 They say history repeats itself. But it does so in ironic ways. In 1986, the world became witness to a bloodless revolution, where the outraged Filipinos took to the streets and faced the military might of an overstaying President. The EDSA2 People Power Revolution became a part of Philippine history. In 2001, EDSA again became the site of mass protests, this time leading to the downfall of an elected President accused of corruption, ineptitude and immorality, barely half into his legal term. Like its predecessor, People Power II will also be forever a marker in Philippine history. However, unlike its predecessor, People Power II was barely bloodless and definitely not a revolution.3 In 1986, Supreme Court Chief Justice Claudio Teehankee administered the oath as President to Corazon Cojuangco Aquino as revolutionary successor of Ferdinand Edralin Marcos. The oath taking was met with much celebration, as it symbolized hope and freedom from tyranny for the Filipinos. In 2001, Supreme Court Chief Justice Hilario Davide, Jr. * Submitted as one of the entries to the Irene Cortes Award for Best Paper in Constitutional Law on 24 March 2003 at the UP College of Law. * The authors graduated from the UP College of Law in April 2003. They acknowledge the invaluable input and support of Sen. Juan Ponce Enrile, Dr. Miriam Defensor-Santiago, Atty.
[Show full text]