DOCSLIB.ORG

C O V E R S H E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

C O V E R S H E E T for SEC FORM 17-A SEC Registration Number C S 2 0 0 6 0 4 4 9 4 C O M P A N Y N A M E M E T R O P A C I F I C I N V E S T M E N T S C O R P O R A T I O N A N D S U B S I D I A R I E S PRINCIPAL OFFICE ( No. / Street / Barangay / City / Town / Province ) 1 0 t h F l o o r , M G O B u i l d i n g , L e g a s p i c o r n e r D e l a R o s a S t r e e t s , L e g a s p i V i l l a g e , M a k a t i C i t y Form Type Department requiring the report Secondary License Type, If Applicable A C F S C O M P A N Y I N F O R M A T I O N Company’s Email Address Company’s Telephone Number Mobile Number [email protected] +632-888-0888 – No. of Stockholders Annual Meeting (Month / Day) Fiscal Year (Month / Day) 1,307 as of 12.31.2019 Last Friday of May December 31 CONTACT PERSON INFORMATION The designated contact person MUST be an Officer of the Corporation Name of Contact Person Email Address Telephone Number/s Mobile Number Mr. David J. Nicol [email protected] +632-8888- – 0888 CONTACT PERSON’s ADDRESS 10/F MGO Building, Legaspi corner Dela Rosa Streets Legaspi Village, Makati 0721 Philippines NOTE 1 : In case of death, resignation or cessation of office of the officer designated as contact person, such incident shall be reported to the Commission within thirty (30) calendar days from the occurrence thereof with information and complete contact details of the new contact person designated. 2 : All Boxes must be properly and completely filled-up. Failure to do so shall cause the delay in updating the corporation’s records with the Commission and/or non-receipt of Notice of Deficiencies. Further, non-receipt of Notice of Deficiencies shall not excuse the corporation from liability for its deficiencies. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SEC FORM 17-A ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE SECURITIES REGULATION CODE AND SECTION 141 OF THE CORPORATION CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES 1. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 2. SEC identification number CS200604494 3. BIR Tax Identification No. 244-520-457-000 4. Exact name of issuer as specified in its charter METRO PACIFIC INVESTMENTS CORPORATION 5. Province, country or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization Makati City, Philippines 6. Industry Classification Code: (SEC Use Only) 7. Address of issuer's principal office Postal Code 10/F MGO Bldg., Legaspi cor. Dela Rosa Sts., Legazpi Village, 0721 Makati City 8. Issuer's telephone number, including area code (632) 8888 0888 9. Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report N/A 10. Securities registered pursuant to Sections 8 and 12 of the Code, or Sections 4 and 8 of the RSA Title of each Class Number of shares of common stock outstanding and amount of debt outstanding Common Shares 31,568,738,752* *Reported by the stock transfer agent as at February 29, 2020 and excluded the shares held by the Company 11. Are any or all of these securities listed on the Philippine Stock Exchange? Yes [ x ] No [ ] 12. Check whether the registrant: a) has filed all reports to be filed by Section 17 of the SRC and SRC Rule 17 thereunder or Section 11 of the RSA and RSA Rule 11 (1)-1 thereunder and Sections 26 and 141 of the Corporation Code of the Philippines during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); Yes [ x ] No [ ] b) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ x ] No [ ] 13. State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant. The aggregate market value shall be computed by reference to the price at which the stock was sold; or the average bid and asked price of such stock, as of a specified date within sixty (60) days prior to the date of filing. If a determination as to whether a particular person or entity is an affiliate cannot be made without involving unreasonable effort and expense, the aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates may be calculated on the basis of assumptions reasonable under the circumstances, provided the assumptions are set forth in the Form. The aggregate market value of voting stocks held by non-affiliates representing 57.75% of outstanding common shares is P=55,972 million, computed on the basis of the closing price as at February 29, 2020 of P=3.07 per share. METRO PACIFIC INVESTMENTS CORPORATION SEC FORM 17-A December 31, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I – BUSINESS AND GENERAL INFORMATION ................................................................... 1 Item 1. Description of Business .................................................................................................... 1 Item 2. Description of Properties ................................................................................................ 41 Item 3. Legal Proceedings ........................................................................................................... 43 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders .................................................... 43 PART II – OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION .................................................... 44 Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters .................. 44 Item 6. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD & A) ................................................................................................................. 48 Financial Highlights and Key Performance Indicators .................................................. 48 Operational Review ........................................................................................................ 50 I - MPIC Consolidated ................................................................................................... 50 II - Operating Segments of the Group ............................................................................ 54 MPIC Consolidated Statement of Financial Position ..................................................... 61 Liquidity and Capital Resources .................................................................................... 65 Comparison of Other Financial Years ............................................................................ 66 2018 versus 2017 ........................................................................................................... 66 2017 versus 2016 ........................................................................................................... 80 Item 7. Consolidated Financial Statements ................................................................................. 97 Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures .................................................................................................................................. 97 PART III – CONTROL AND COMPENSATION INFORMATION .................................................. 98 Item 9. Directors and Executive Officers of the Issuer ............................................................... 98 Item 10. Executive Compensation ........................................................................................... 120 Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Record and Beneficial Owners and Management .... 123 Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions ............................................... 125 PART IV – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ..................................................................................... 125 Item 13. Corporate Governance portion of the Annual Report ................................................. 125 Item 14. Sustainability Report ................................................................................................... 127 PART V – EXHIBITS AND SCHEDULES ....................................................................................... 128 Item 15. Exhibits and Reports on SEC Form 17-C (Current Reports) ...................................... 128 Item 16. Signatures .................................................................................................................... 128 Item 17. Index to Financial Statements and Supplementary Schedules .................................... 130 i. Exhibit I - 2019 Audited Financial Statements ......................................................... 130 ii. Exhibit II - Supplementary Schedules ..................................................................... 130 PART I – BUSINESS AND GENERAL INFORMATION Item 1. Description of Business (A) Business Development Metro Pacific Investments Corporation (the Parent Company or MPIC) was incorporated in the Philippines and registered with the Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 20, 2006 as an investment holding company. MPIC’s common shares of stock are listed in and traded through the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE). On August 6, 2012, MPIC launched Sponsored Level 1 American Depositary Receipt (ADR) Program with Deutsche Bank as the appointed depositary bank in line with the Parent Company’s thrust to widen the availability of its shares to investors in the United States. The principal activities of the Parent Company’s subsidiaries and equity method investees are described in Notes 1, 10 and 40 of the attached 2019 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements. The Parent Company and its subsidiaries are collectively referred to as “the Company”. Metro Pacific Holdings, Inc. (MPHI) owns 41.9% of the total
Recommended publications
  • The 1986 EDSA Revolution? These Are Just Some of the Questions That You Will Be Able to Answer As You Study This Module

    The 1986 EDSA Revolution? These Are Just Some of the Questions That You Will Be Able to Answer As You Study This Module

    What Is This Module About? “The people united will never be defeated.” The statement above is about “people power.” It means that if people are united, they can overcome whatever challenges lie ahead of them. The Filipinos have proven this during a historic event that won the admiration of the whole world—the 1986 EDSA “People Power” Revolution. What is the significance of this EDSA Revolution? Why did it happen? If revolution implies a struggle for change, was there any change after the 1986 EDSA Revolution? These are just some of the questions that you will be able to answer as you study this module. This module has three lessons: Lesson 1 – Revisiting the Historical Roots of the 1986 EDSA Revolution Lesson 2 – The Ouster of the Dictator Lesson 3 – The People United Will Never Be Defeated What Will You Learn From This Module? After studying this module, you should be able to: ♦ identify the reasons why the 1986 EDSA Revolution occurred; ♦ describe how the 1986 EDSA Revolution took place; and ♦ identify and explain the lessons that can be drawn from the 1986 EDSA Revolution. 1 Let’s See What You Already Know Before you start studying this module, take this simple test first to find out what you already know about this topic. Read each sentence below. If you agree with what it says, put a check mark (4) under the column marked Agree. If you disagree with what it says, put a check under the Disagree column. And if you’re not sure about your answer, put a check under the Not Sure column.
  • 1. Introduction

    1. Introduction

    Republic of the Philippines Department of Transportation and Communications and the Light Rail Transit Authority MANILA LRT1 EXTENSION, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PROJECT Preliminary Information Memorandum June 2012 Transaction Advisors With Assistance From DOTC/LRTA – Manila LRT1 Extension, Operations and Maintenance Project: Preliminary Information Memorandum June 2012 Disclaimer This Preliminary Information Memorandum (PIM) has been prepared by the Development Bank of the Philippines (DBP) and the International Finance Corporation (IFC) on behalf of their clients, the Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC) and the Light Rail Transit Authority (LRTA), in line with their mandate as Transaction Advisors to the DOTC in the development, structuring and tendering of the Manila LRT1 Extension, Operations and Maintenance Project as a Solicited Transaction under the Philippine Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) Law or Republic Act (RA) 6957, as amended by RA 7718. This PIM does not purport to be all-inclusive or to contain all of the information that a prospective participant may consider material or desirable in making its decision to participate in the tender. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made, or responsibility of any kind is or will be accepted by the DBP, IFC, LRTA, the DOTC, or the Government of the Republic of the Philippines (ROP) or any of its agencies, with respect to the accuracy and completeness of this preliminary information. The DOTC and LRTA, by themselves or through their Advisors the DBP and IFC, may amend or replace any of the information contained in this PIM at any time, without giving any prior notice or providing any reason.
  • Papal Visit Philippines 2014 and 2015 2014

    Papal Visit Philippines 2014 and 2015 2014

    This event is dedicated to the Filipino People on the occasion of the five- day pastoral and state visit of Pope Francis here in the Philippines on October 23 to 27, 2014 part of 22- day Asian and Oceanian tour from October 22 to November 13, 2014. Papal Visit Philippines 2014 and 2015 ―Mercy and Compassion‖ a Papal Visit Philippines 2014 and 2015 2014 Contents About the project ............................................................................................... 2 About the Theme of the Apostolic Visit: ‗Mercy and Compassion‘.................................. 4 History of Jesus is Lord Church Worldwide.............................................................................. 6 Executive Branch of the Philippines ....................................................................... 15 Presidents of the Republic of the Philippines ....................................................................... 15 Vice Presidents of the Republic of the Philippines .............................................................. 16 Speaker of the House of Representatives of the Philippines ............................................ 16 Presidents of the Senate of the Philippines .......................................................................... 17 Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines ...................................................... 17 Leaders of the Roman Catholic Church ................................................................ 18 Pope (Roman Catholic Bishop of Rome and Worldwide Leader of Roman
  • Technological Evolution of Manila Light Rail Transit System

    Technological Evolution of Manila Light Rail Transit System

    International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology Vol.89 (2016), pp.9-16 http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/ijast.2016.89.02 Technological Evolution of Manila Light Rail Transit System Tomas U. Ganiron Jr IAENG, Hongkong College of Architecture, Qassim University, Buraidah City [email protected] Abstract This study focuses on the different elements of Manila Light Rail Transit System Line 1 in Metro Manila with the aim of characterizing its technological evolution and putting in context its impact in terms of what it is best designed for and what it can deliver. The study provides the concept of understanding the recent operation and developmental resolutions that the management of LRTA line 1 is providing as a preparation to uplift the socio-economic conditions of the commuters. Through the application of technology and scientific principles by means of transportation engineering for managing the facilities of the LRTA line 1 system, the system can provide safer, more rapid, more convenient, economic and environmental friendly way of transportation for the increasing demand of commuters. However, LRT 1 is best designed to substitute conventional railway services on routes where much higher capacity is required and to reduce travel time, further improving the railway service, also against other modes, therefore leading to mode substitution. Keywords: Highway engineering, railway transit, road engineering, transportation engineering 1. Introduction The traffic jams in Manila are staggering. Only a few traffic lights often disregarded separate the combatants. Every one force his way across the junctions, thus blocking everyone else and so the government decided to find a solution.
  • Pedestrian Simulation of Metro Rail Transit (Mrt) Line 7 Station 1-North Avenue Station, Quezon City, Philippines

    Pedestrian Simulation of Metro Rail Transit (Mrt) Line 7 Station 1-North Avenue Station, Quezon City, Philippines

    International Journal of GEOMATE, Feb., 2020, Vol.18, Issue 66, pp.156-162 ISSN: 2186-2982 (P), 2186-2990 (O), Japan, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21660/2020.96320 Geotechnique, Construction Materials and Environment PEDESTRIAN SIMULATION OF METRO RAIL TRANSIT (MRT) LINE 7 STATION 1-NORTH AVENUE STATION, QUEZON CITY, PHILIPPINES Romnick P. De Los Reyes1, Marloe B. Sundo2 and *Marish S. Madlangbayan2 1Sustainable Transport & Infrastructure Development Consulting, Inc., Philippines; 2Department of Civil Engineering, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Philippines *Corresponding Author, Received: 26 Sept. 2019, Revised: 14 Dec. 2019, Accepted: 31 Dec. 2019 ABSTRACT: Simulation of pedestrian flow represents an advanced approach in modeling and evaluating train stations. In this study, pedestrian simulation was done using the simulation software Simio to assess the passenger capacity of MRT 7 Station 1-North Avenue Station through level of service (LOS), queuing system, and train facility utilization. This paper presents the actual situation inside the train station while predicting the behavior of queuing pedestrians and provides an accurate estimate of the volume-to-capacity ratio of passengers entering the station. The study’s approach debugged the conventional assignments of pedestrians currently used in the field. The constructed three-dimensional building of the North Avenue Station served as framework for the simulation. Sources, sinks, servers, and paths of the software were the main elements of the simulation. Each library was defined by their time usage based on data gathered. Time usages of 1.21 sec. and 240 sec. for sources and sinks, respectively, were used in the simulation. Servers were defined by the train facilities utilized in the simulation, namely, automatic ticketing machines (TVM) with time usage of 43 seconds, ticketing toll gates with 1.4 seconds, and manual ticketing windows (BOM) with 20 seconds.
  • Producing Rizal: Negotiating Modernity Among the Filipino Diaspora in Hawaii

    Producing Rizal: Negotiating Modernity Among the Filipino Diaspora in Hawaii

    PRODUCING RIZAL: NEGOTIATING MODERNITY AMONG THE FILIPINO DIASPORA IN HAWAII A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN ASIAN STUDIES AUGUST 2014 By Ai En Isabel Chew Thesis Committee: Patricio Abinales, Chairperson Cathryn Clayton Vina Lanzona Keywords: Filipino Diaspora, Hawaii, Jose Rizal, Modernity, Rizalista Sects, Knights of Rizal 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………..…5 Chapter 1 Introduction: Rizal as a Site of Contestation………………………………………………………………………………………....6 Methodology ..................................................................................................................18 Rizal in the Filipino Academic Discourse......................................................................21 Chapter 2 Producing Rizal: Interactions on the Trans-Pacific Stage during the American Colonial Era,1898-1943…………………………..………………………………………………………...29 Rizal and the Philippine Revolution...............................................................................33 ‘Official’ Productions of Rizal under American Colonial Rule .....................................39 Rizal the Educated Cosmopolitan ..................................................................................47 Rizal as the Brown Messiah ...........................................................................................56 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................66
  • Defeating Revisionism, Reformism and Opportunism

    Defeating Revisionism, Reformism and Opportunism

    Jose Ma. Sison (Amado Guerrero) Defeating Revisionism, Reformism and Opportunism Selected Writings, 1969 to 1974 International Network for Philippine Studies The Netherlands and Aklat ng Bayan, Inc. Philippines Copyright © 2013 by International Network for Philippine Studies (INPS) Published by International Network for Philippine Studies (INPS) and Aklat ng Bayan, Inc. ISBN 978-1-62847-921-8 Cover design by Janos J.L.L. Sison Book design by Alvin Firmeza Contents Editor's Note ix Author's Preface 1 Carry the Struggle against Modern Revisionism through to the End 5 The Lava Revisionist Renegades Are Counterrevolutionaries 7 On the Reformists 11 A Seminar of Landlords on "Land Reform" 11 Masaka Factions Quarrel over Ople 11 Soviet Social-Imperialists Cooperate with US in Defence-Aerospace Program 12 The Treachery of Taruc as a Negative Example 15 Taruc-Sumulong Gangster Clique Is Desperately Isolated 25 Fake Controversy Concocted to Obscure Fundamental Issues in Church 27 Reformist Organizations Beg for Land Reform from Reactionary Government 29 Reactionary "Labor" Confederations "Unite" behind Management and Marcos 33 Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation, Inc. Admits It Enjoys State Protection 35 Expose and Oppose the Vicious Crimes of the Monkees-Armeng Bayan-Masaka (Lava) Gang 39 On the Counterrevolutionary Line of the Lava Revisionist Renegades 43 On the Movement for the Advancement of Nationalism 51 Against the Wishful Thinking of a Revisionist Puppet of US Imperialism 59 I. Capitulation to US Imperialism and the Domestic Ruling System 59 II. Abandonment of Revolutionary Struggle 67 On the Pretended Capture of Sumulong 77 On the Philippine Business for Social Progress 79 Cast Away the Labor Aristocrats! 83 Kidnapping and Murder of Carlos B.
  • Martial Law and the Communist Parties of the Philippines, 1959–1974

    Martial Law and the Communist Parties of the Philippines, 1959–1974

    Crisis of Revolutionary Leadership: Martial Law and the Communist Parties of the Philippines, 1959–1974 By Joseph Paul Scalice A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in South and Southeast Asian Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Associate Professor Jerey Hadler, Chair Professor Peter Zinoman Professor Andrew Barshay Summer 2017 Crisis of Revolutionary Leadership: Martial Law and the Communist Parties of the Philippines, 1957-1974 Copyright 2017 by Joseph Paul Scalice 1 Abstract Crisis of Revolutionary Leadership: Martial Law and the Communist Parties of the Philippines, 1959–1974 by Joseph Paul Scalice Doctor of Philosophy in South and Southeast Asian Studies University of California, Berkeley Associate Professor Jerey Hadler, Chair In 1967 the Partido Komunista ng Pilipinas (pkp) split in two. Within two years a second party – the Communist Party of the Philippines (cpp) – had been founded. In this work I argue that it was the political program of Stalinism, embodied in both parties through three basic principles – socialism in one country, the two-stage theory of revolution, and the bloc of four classes – that determined the fate of political struggles in the Philippines in the late 1960s and early 1970s and facilitated Marcos’ declaration of Martial Law in September 1972. I argue that the split in the Communist Party of the Philippines was the direct expression of the Sino-Soviet split in global Stalinism. The impact of this geopolitical split arrived late in the Philippines because it was initially refracted through Jakarta.
  • 2020 Sustainability Report Contents About the Report

    2020 Sustainability Report Contents About the Report

    Enabling Infrastructure Development for National Progress 2020 Sustainability Report Contents About the Report This is the fifth sustainability report of Metro Pacific Investments Corporation (MPIC, the Company or the Parent Company) containing information about our economic, environmental, social, and governance (ESG or Sustainability) impacts for the year ending December 2020. This report should be read in conjunction with our SEC Part 1: Form 17A and our 2020 Information Statement. In line with our commitment to transparency and accountability, we have prepared this report in accordance with the Contributing to National Progress and 1 Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Industry Standards, United Nations Improving the Quality of Life of Filipinos Global Compact Index (UNGC), and Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards: Core Option. DNV has provided an independent assurance statement for our sustainability or non-financial disclosures. We welcome feedback on this report and any matter concerning the sustainability performance of our business. Part 2: Please contact us at: Our Sustainability Pillars 25 Metro Pacific Investments Corporation Investor Relations 10/F MGO Building, Legaspi corner Dela Rosa Streets, Makati City, 0721, Philippines +63 2 8888 0888 [email protected] Annex The 2020 Sustainability Report was published on 80 April 5, 2021 and is also available for download from the corporate website. Part 1: Contributing to National Progress and Improving the Quality of Life of Filipinos Part 2: Our Sustainability
  • The Philippines: Human Rights After Martial Law

    The Philippines: Human Rights After Martial Law

    THE PHILIPPINES: HUMAN RIGHTS AFTER MARTIAL LAW Report of a Mission by Professor Virginia Leary, United States Mr A.A. Ellis, QC, New Zealand Dr Kurt Madlener, Fédéral Republic of Germany THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION OF JURISTS Geneva, Switzerland MEMBERS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION OF JURISTS KEBA MBAYE Judge of Int’l Court of Justice; former Près. Supreme (Président) Court, Sénégal, and UN Commission on Human Rights ROBERTO CONCEPCION Former Chief Justice, Philippines (Vice-President) HELENO CLAUDIO FRAGOSO Advocate; Professor of Pénal Law, Rio de Janeiro (Vice-President) JOHN P. HUMPHREY Prof, of Law, Montréal; former Director, UN Human (Vice-President) Rights Division ANDRES AGUILAR MAWDSLEY Prof, of Law, Venezuela; former Près. Inter-American Commission BADRIA AL-AWADHI Dean, Faculty of Law and Sharia, Univ. of Kuwait ALPHONSE BONI Président of Supreme Court of Ivory Coast WILLIAM J. BUTLER Attorney at law, New York RAUL F. CARDENAS Advocate; Prof, of Criminal Law, Mexico HAIM H. COHN Former Supreme Court Judge, Israël AUGUSTO CONTE-MACDONELL Advocate; member of Parliament, Argentina TASLIM OLAWALE ELIAS Près., Int’l Court of Justice; former Chief Justice of Nigeria ALFREDO ETCHEBERRY Advocate; Professor of Law, University of Chile GUILLERMO FIGALLO Former Member of Supreme Court of Peru LORD GARDINER Former Lord Chancellor of England P. TELFORD GEORGES Chief Justice, Supreme Court, The Bahamas LOUIS JOXE Ambassador of France; former Minister of State P.J.G. KAPTEYN Councillor of State, Netherlands; former Prof, of Int’l Law MICHAEL D. KIRBY Judge, Fédéral Court of Australia KINUKO KUBOTA Former Prof, of Constitutional Law, Japan RAJSOOMER LALLAH Judge of the Supreme Court, Mauritius TAI-YOUNG LEE Director, Korean Légal Aid Centre for Family Relations SEAN MACBRIDE Former Irish Minister of External Affairs RUDOLF MACHACEK Member of Constitutional Court, Austria J.R.W.S.
  • LRT Line 6 Project

    LRT Line 6 Project

    Republic of the Philippines Department of Transportation and Communications LRT Line 6 Project Information Memorandum December 2015 Transaction Advisors LRT Line 6 Project Information Memorandum Disclaimer This Information Memorandum (“IM”) has been prepared by the Government of the Philippines’ (“GOP”) Department of Transportation & Communications (“DOTC”) with the assistance of the Public- Private Partnership Center (“PPPC”). A consortium of advisors led by Ernst & Young Solutions LLP (“EY”) as transaction advisors and CPCS Transcom Limited (“CPCS”) as technical advisor (EY and CPCS each a “Transaction Advisor” and collectively, the “Transaction Advisors”) has been appointed to assist the DOTC in the structuring and tendering of the Light Rail Transit (LRT) Line 6 Project (“LRT Line 6 Project” or the “Project”). This IM aims to provide preliminary information about the Project and does not purport to be all- inclusive or to contain all of the information that a prospective recipient may consider material or desirable in making its decision to participate in the tender. This IM or any part of it shall not form the basis of or be relied upon in connection with any contract or commitment whatsoever. No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made, and no responsibility of any kind is or will be accepted by the DOTC, the PPPC, any Transaction Advisor (or any of their sub-consultants) or the GOP or any of its agencies, with respect to the accuracy and completeness of this preliminary information. The DOTC by itself or through the PPPC or the Transaction Advisors (or any of their sub-consultants) may amend or replace any of the information contained in this IM at any time, without giving any prior notice or providing any reason.
  • SEC Approves Loan for Manila Electric O

    SEC Approves Loan for Manila Electric O

    NEWSPAPER SOURCES DATE AUTHOR TITLE PUBLICATION 3/3/1945 - Manila Utility Will Get Aid LA Times 4/7/1945 - SEC Approves Loan for Manila Electric Oakland Tribune 6/1/1946 - Central Council Views Suspended Monorail San Francisco City-County Record Model 4/28/1957 Santos, Dominador Moving People in Manila and Suburbs STM 11/13/1959 - D.C. Monorail Transit System Urged Cumberland News 8/6/1961 Schneider, Kenneth B. How to Ease Manila's Traffic Problems STM 9/11/1961 - Filipino Businessmen Plan First Monorail in MT Manila 9/24/1961 Santos, Dominador Of[t]-repeated stand STM 11/16/1962 - Transport Survey Set MT 11/25/1962 David, Ben Monorail system for city proposed Sunday Times 11/26/1962 - Manila Monorail System Proposed Pasadena Independent 11/26/1962 - Manila Monorail Independent 11/26/1962 - Plan Philippine Monorail Albuquerque Journal 11/27/1962 - City Monorail Proposal Deserves Serious Daily Mirror Study 1/17/1965 - Corruption in Food, Rail Fields Shakes The Fresno Bee The Republican Manila 3/27/1965 Tamayo, Gerardo Traffic Problems MT Supplement 6/16/1965 - 10 Killed when Trains Collide in Philippines St. Louis Post-Dispatch 6/17/1965 - Wire Thieves Cause Wreck Killing 14 Independent 6/18/1965 - Dispatcher Blamed The Cincinnati Enquirer 6/30/1965 Del Rosario, Cesario Trahedya sa La Union PFP 4/5/1966 - Crash Kills Nine The Palm Beach Post 6/21/1966 - Manila May Get Monorail The Ottawa Journal 8/21/1966 Ravenholt, Albert Aid Goals Shifted by Philippines The Philadelphia Inquirer 5/31/1967 - Train Crash Kills 6 The Indianapolis Star 2/19/1968 - Manila's rapid transit to go overhead in 1971 Honolulu-Star Bulletin 7/14/1968 Reyes, T.