DOCSLIB.ORG

CHINA COUNTRY of ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CHINA COUNTRY of ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service CHINA COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service 24 August 2011 CHINA 24 AUGUST 2011 Contents Preface Latest News EVENTS IN CHINA FROM 13 TO 24 AUGUST 2011 Useful news sources for further information REPORTS ON CHINA PUBLISHED OR ACCESSED BETWEEN 13 AND 24 AUGUST 2011 Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................ 1.01 Map ........................................................................................................................ 1.05 Languages ........................................................................................................... 1.06 Population ............................................................................................................. 1.07 Naming conventions ........................................................................................... 1.08 Tibetan names ................................................................................................... 1.09 Public holidays ................................................................................................... 1.10 2. ECONOMY ................................................................................................................ 2.01 Poverty .................................................................................................................. 2.03 Currency ................................................................................................................ 2.07 3. HISTORY .................................................................................................................. 3.01 1949-1976: The Mao Zedong era ......................................................................... 3.01 1978-1989: China under Deng Xiaoping ............................................................. 3.03 1990-2000: Post-Tiananmen Square ................................................................... 3.04 2000 onwards: A new generation of leaders ...................................................... 3.05 4. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ........................................................................................... 4.01 5. CONSTITUTION .......................................................................................................... 5.01 6. POLITICAL SYSTEM ................................................................................................... 6.01 Chinese Communist Party (CCP) ........................................................................ 6.04 Human Rights 7. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 7.01 8. SECURITY FORCES .................................................................................................... 8.01 Police ..................................................................................................................... 8.03 Private security firms .......................................................................................... 8.06 Organised crime ................................................................................................. 8.07 Armed forces ........................................................................................................ 8.12 Human rights violations by security forces ....................................................... 8.13 Torture ................................................................................................................ 8.13 Extrajudicial killings ............................................................................................ 8.22 Avenues of complaint .......................................................................................... 8.23 9. MILITARY SERVICE .................................................................................................... 9.01 Postponement and exemption ............................................................................ 9.04 Desertion ............................................................................................................... 9.06 10. JUDICIARY ................................................................................................................ 10.01 Organisation ......................................................................................................... 10.01 ii The main text of this COI Report contains the most up to date publicly available information as at 12 August 2011. Further brief information on recent events and reports has been provided in the Latest News section to 24 August 2011. 24 AUGUST 2011 CHINA Independence ....................................................................................................... 10.02 Fair trial ................................................................................................................. 10.04 Restrictions on lawyers ....................................................................................... 10.07 Criminal Procedure Law (1997) ........................................................................... 10.12 State Security Law (1993) .................................................................................... 10.13 Double jeopardy ................................................................................................... 10.15 11. ARREST AND DETENTION – LEGAL RIGHTS .................................................................. 11.01 Arrest warrants ..................................................................................................... 11.08 Wanted posters..................................................................................................... 11.10 Resisting arrest/hitting an official ....................................................................... 11.13 Punishment of minor offences ............................................................................ 11.15 12. PRISON CONDITIONS ................................................................................................. 12.01 Psychiatric custody (Ankang system) ................................................................ 12.08 Administrative detention/labour camps ............................................................. 12.13 Re-education Through Labour (RTL) ................................................................. 12.13 Other forms of administrative detention.............................................................. 12.18 13. DEATH PENALTY ....................................................................................................... 13.01 Suspended death sentences ............................................................................... 13.04 Number of executions .......................................................................................... 13.05 Judicial oversight ................................................................................................. 13.07 People exempted from the death penalty ........................................................... 13.09 14. POLITICAL AFFILIATION.............................................................................................. 14.01 Freedom of political expression.......................................................................... 14.01 Freedom of association and assembly ............................................................... 14.07 Civil disturbances ............................................................................................... 14.10 Opposition groups and political activists .......................................................... 14.20 China Democracy Party (CDP) .......................................................................... 14.23 UK Branch of the China Democracy Party ......................................................... 14.30 Monitoring of activists abroad ............................................................................. 14.31 Tiananmen Square activists ............................................................................... 14.32 15. FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND MEDIA ............................................................................... 15.01 Radio, TV and print media ................................................................................... 15.01 Internet .................................................................................................................. 15.08 Journalists ............................................................................................................ 15.11 16. HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS, ORGANISATIONS AND ACTIVISTS .................................... 16.01 17. CORRUPTION ............................................................................................................ 17.01 Breaches of Party discipline ............................................................................... 17.04 Guanxi (social connections) ................................................................................ 17.06 18. FREEDOM OF RELIGION .............................................................................................. 18.01 Registration .......................................................................................................... 18.05 Buddhists .............................................................................................................. 18.08 Taoists ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Landscape to Proof
    death sentences and executions 2009 amnesty international is a global movement of 2.8 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the universal declaration of human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. amnesty international Publications First published in 2010 by amnesty international Publications international secretariat Peter Benenson house 1 easton street London Wc1x 0dW united Kingdom www.amnesty.org © amnesty international Publications 2010 index: act 50/001/2010 original language: english Printed by amnesty international, international secretariat, united Kingdom all rights reserved. this publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. the copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. For copying in any other circumstances, or for re-use in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. Cover phot o: Painting by delara darabi, who was executed in Rasht, iran, on 1 May 2009. after unfair judicial proceedings during which she consistently protested her innocence and despite a two-month stay of execution order, delara darabi was hanged for a murder which took place when she was aged 17. © delara darabi Back cover phot o: a flower-laying protest against the execution of delara darabi was held by amnesty international members in front of the embassy of iran in Warsaw, Poland, on 6 May 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • New Challenges and Opportunities in the Taiwan Strait: Defining America’S Role
    New Challenges and Opportunities in the Taiwan Strait: Defining America’s Role By Thomas J. Christensen PREFACE Nations define their identities in many ways – through language, culture, political ideology, religion, ethnicity, and territory. When one or more of these elements becomes contested either between nations or within them, the potential for conflict and war arises. In the case of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan, all six of these elements are now to a greater or lesser degree being contested. The official view of the PRC is that Taiwan is part of a yet-to-be-defined “one China.” The ROC no longer claims to be the legitimate government of all of China; its official position is that it is a separate, independent state, reunification is only an option, and an option that could only be achieved should both sides of the Strait, as equals, come to a mutually satisfactory agreement. Adding to the complexity of what is known as cross-Strait relations is the deep involvement of the United States, which maintains close but “unofficial” ties with Taiwan and ever-expanding, official relations with the mainland, and whose policies and military support for Taiwan are designed to dissuade both parties from actions that would lead them to violent conflict. Developments of major historical significance have taken place in the PRC and the ROC since Truman first involved the United States by sending the Seventh Fleet to patrol the Taiwan Strait shortly after the outbreak of the Korean War. The two most relevant to current cross-Strait relations are the PRC’s “Reform and Opening” and its resulting economic growth, and the development of multi-party democracy in the ROC.
    [Show full text]
  • Customer Name
    商業客戶資料 / Corporate Client (CIF) Information □ 開立 / Creation □ 更改 / Change 注意: - 請用正楷填寫並在適當的方格內劃上“”號。 PARA USO DO BANCO FOR BANK USE 如所提供作答的空間不足，請使用附有貴公司機構名稱之信函提供有關資料。 C.I.F.: Note : - Please fill in BLOCK LETTERS and tick where applicable In case the space provided for any answer is not enough, please use paper with your company letterhead to provide the data 日期 Date:___ (日 day) ____ (月 month) ______ (年 year) 1. – 公司名稱: Company Full Name: 2. 註冊號碼: 註冊日期: 註冊地: 國家代碼 Business Registration Nr. : Date of Incorporation: Country of Incorporation: Country Code: _______________________ ____ /____ / ________ ___ ___ ___ 資本: Share capital ____________________________ 3. 營業地址: 郵政編號: Business Address: Postal Code: 省/州: 國家 國家代碼 Province / State: Country: Country Code: ___ ___ ___ 電話: 傳真 電郵 Telephone Fax: E-mail: 4. 通訊地址: (若有異於營業地址) 郵政編號: Correspondence Address: (if different from “Business Address”) Postal Code: 省/州: 國家 國家代碼 Province / State: Country: Country Code: ___ ___ ___ 電話: 傳真 電郵 Telephone Fax: E-mail: 5. 行業: Code: Line of Business: Código ___________ 6. 股東 Shareholders 姓名: 持股權 國籍 常居地址: CIF Name: Share Nationality: Habitual Residential Address: Page 頁 1 of 4 7. 董事會成員及有效簽署人: Directors & Authorized Signatories: 姓名: 職位 國籍 常居地: CIF Name: /Title Nationality: Habitual Residential Address: 8. 持有其他公司股權 (如有) Shareholdings in other companies – if applicable 公司名稱: Company Full Name: 註冊地址 Registered Address: 註冊日期 持股金額 持股量 Date of incorporation Share Capital Capital _________________________________________________ ____ / ____ / _________ ___________________ _______ _________________________________________________ 公司名稱: Company Full Name: 註冊地址 Registered Address: 註冊日期 持股金額 所佔率% Date of incorporation Share Capital Capital _________________________________________________ ____ / ____ / _________ ___________________ _______ _________________________________________________ 9. 擁有之不動產(如有): Real Estate owned by the Company – if applicable 註冊地址: 地點: 市值: 負擔(抵押 / 按揭) Description/Registration details: Location: Value: Pledge / Mortgage: Page 頁 2 of 4 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Woman Jailed Over Twitter Post 18 November 2010
    Chinese woman jailed over Twitter post 18 November 2010 disputed East China Sea archipelago claimed by both sides. "Sentencing someone to a year in a labour camp, without trial, for simply repeating another person's clearly satirical observation on Twitter demonstrates the level of China's repression of online expression," said Sam Zarifi, Amnesty International's Director for the Asia-Pacific. Amnesty urged the government to release Cheng, who it said could be the first Chinese citizen to A Chinese woman has been sentenced to a year in a become "a prisoner of conscience on the basis of a labour camp after she retweeted a Twitter post that single tweet." mocked anti-Japanese protesters, according to human rights groups. The government blocks Twitter, but many people access it on the mainland via virtual proxy networks. A Chinese woman has been sentenced to a year in (c) 2010 AFP a labour camp after she retweeted a Twitter post that mocked anti-Japanese protesters, according to human rights groups. A court on Monday convicted Cheng Jianping, 46, of "disturbing social order" after she added a few words to a message written by her fiance, Hua Chunhui, Amnesty International said Wednesday. Activist group Chinese Human Rights Defenders on Thursday that confirmed Cheng, whose Twitter username is "wangyi09", had been jailed in the central province of Henan. AFP calls to the provincial court were not answered. On October 17, Cheng added the phrase "Angry youth, charge!" before retweeting Hua's message that mocked Chinese anti-Japanese protesters who had smashed Japanese products over a maritime dispute between the two countries, Amnesty said.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional-Executive Commission on China Annual Report 2019
    CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ANNUAL REPORT 2019 ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 18, 2019 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: https://www.cecc.gov VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:38 Nov 18, 2019 Jkt 036743 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 5011 G:\ANNUAL REPORT\ANNUAL REPORT 2019\2019 AR GPO FILES\FRONTMATTER.TXT CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ANNUAL REPORT 2019 ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 18, 2019 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: https://www.cecc.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 36–743 PDF WASHINGTON : 2019 VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:38 Nov 18, 2019 Jkt 036743 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 G:\ANNUAL REPORT\ANNUAL REPORT 2019\2019 AR GPO FILES\FRONTMATTER.TXT CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS House Senate JAMES P. MCGOVERN, Massachusetts, MARCO RUBIO, Florida, Co-chair Chair JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio TOM COTTON, Arkansas THOMAS SUOZZI, New York STEVE DAINES, Montana TOM MALINOWSKI, New Jersey TODD YOUNG, Indiana BEN MCADAMS, Utah DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California CHRISTOPHER SMITH, New Jersey JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon BRIAN MAST, Florida GARY PETERS, Michigan VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri ANGUS KING, Maine EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS Department of State, To Be Appointed Department of Labor, To Be Appointed Department of Commerce, To Be Appointed At-Large, To Be Appointed At-Large, To Be Appointed JONATHAN STIVERS, Staff Director PETER MATTIS, Deputy Staff Director (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:38 Nov 18, 2019 Jkt 036743 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 G:\ANNUAL REPORT\ANNUAL REPORT 2019\2019 AR GPO FILES\FRONTMATTER.TXT C O N T E N T S Page I.
    [Show full text]
  • China: Procedure and Requirements to Obtain a Biometric Passport
    Responses to Information Requests - Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Page 1 of 3 Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Home > Research Program > Responses to Information Requests Responses to Information Requests Responses to Information Requests (RIR) respond to focused Requests for Information that are submitted to the Research Directorate in the course of the refugee protection determination process. The database contains a seven-year archive of English and French RIRs. Earlier RIRs may be found on the UNHCR's Refworld website. 6 May 2013 CHN104415.E China: Procedure and requirements to obtain a biometric passport, including date they started to be issued; indicators that the passport is biometric, including symbols Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Ottawa 1. Date of First Issue for Biometric Passports Sources indicate that China began to issue biometric passports on 15 May 2012 (China 16 May 2012; Dalian Municipal Government 17 May 2012). The identity-document checking service operated by Keesing Reference Systems writes that a passport that "contains a contactless chip in the back cover" was first issued in February 2012 (n.d.a). According to the official web portal of the Chinese government, traditional passports may continue to be used for as long as they are valid (China 16 May 2012). People's Daily Online, a Chinese news website founded in 1997 (People's Daily Online n.d.), reports that electronic passports for public affairs were first issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on 1 July 2011 (5 July 2011). These passports contain a "'component layer,' consisting of microchips, electronic circuits, and other parts" inside the back cover, which includes "the passport owner's name, sex and personal photo as well as the passport's term of validity and [the] digital certificate of the chip" (ibid.).
    [Show full text]
  • Sino-British Agreement and Nationality: Hong Kong's Future in the Hands of the People's Republic of China
    UCLA UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal Title The Sino-British Agreement and Nationality: Hong Kong's Future in the Hands of the People's Republic of China Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9j3546s0 Journal UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 8(1) Author Chua, Christine Publication Date 1990 DOI 10.5070/P881021965 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California THE SINO-BRITISH AGREEMENT AND NATIONALITY: HONG KONG'S FUTURE IN THE HANDS OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA Christine Chua* I. INTRODUCTION On July 1, 1997, the United Kingdom will officially relinquish its sovereignty over Hong Kong' to the People's Republic of China (PRC). The terms for the transfer of governmental control are set forth in the Joint Declaration of the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Govern- ment of the People's Republic of China on the Question of Hong Kong (hereinafter, "Joint Declaration"), which was signed by rep- resentatives for both governments on December 19, 1984. The terms likewise appear in the Memoranda exchanged by the United 2 Kingdom and PRC governments on the signing date. Set forth in the Joint Declaration is the PRC's intent to estab- lish the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR). 3 Rules for implementing the separate government of the Hong Kong SAR are also enumerated. 4 The creation of the Hong Kong SAR is au- thorized by a provision in the PRC Constitution' originally in- * J.D., 1989, UCLA School of Law; B.A., 1985, Cornell University.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of the Legal Rights and Duties of Lawful Aliens in the United States and the People's Republic of China
    A Comparative Study of the Legal Rights and Duties of Lawful Aliens in the United States and the People's Republic of China JAMES KRAUS* WANG HUIJUN** INTRODUCTION The United States and the People's Republic of China are both in transition regarding their policies toward aliens. The People's Re- public of China traditionally has exported its population. Famine, poverty, population growth, and an unpredictable climate have forced millions of Chinese to emigrate." At the same time, China has discouraged immigration, preferring to develop its resources and cul- ture independent from foreign influence.' The United States tradi- * Assistant Professor of Law, Lehman College, City University of New York. B.S 1964, Cornell University; J.D. 1967, Columbia University. ** Visiting Scholar, Columbia University; Lecturer in Law, Suzhou University Law School. L.L.B. 1982, Fudan University. 1. China has never been a country of immigrants. See Chen, The Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China and the Overseas Chinese in Hong Kong, Macao and Southeast Asia, 5 N.Y.L. SCH. J. INT'L & COMp. L. 281, 291 (1984). Chinese natu- ralization law had, until 1982, disregarded the place of birth as a factor in gaining Chi- nese nationality. This was one indication that China discouraged population growth by means of the admission of people from outside China who did not already hold Chinese nationality through ancestry. China could maintain its population through worldwide na- tionality based on lineage, not place of birth, and Chinese who emigrated were assured that their descendants could safely maintain Chinese nationality. Id.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taiwan Issue and the Normalization of US-China Relations Richard Bush, Brookings Institution Shelley Rigger, Davidson Colleg
    The Taiwan Issue and the Normalization of US-China Relations Richard Bush, Brookings Institution Shelley Rigger, Davidson College The Taiwan Issue in US-China Normalization After 1949, there were many obstacles to normalization of relations between the United States and the new People’s Republic of China (PRC), but Taiwan was no doubt a key obstacle. The Kuomintang-led Republic of China (ROC) government and armies had retreated there. Washington maintained diplomatic relations with the ROC government and, in 1954-55, acceded to Chiang Kai-shek’s entreaties for a mutual defense treaty. After June 1950 with the outbreak of the Korean conflict, the United States took the position that the status of the island of Taiwan— whether it was part of the sovereign territory of China—was “yet to be determined.” More broadly, PRC leaders regarded the United States as a threat to their regime, particularly because of its support for the ROC, and American leaders viewed China as a threat to peace and stability in East Asia and to Taiwan, which they saw as an ally in the containment of Asian communism in general and China in particular. It was from Taiwan’s Ching Chuan Kang (CCK) airbase, for example, that U.S. B-52s flew bombing missions over North Vietnam. By the late 1960s, PRC and U.S. leaders recognized the strategic situation in Asia had changed, and that the geopolitical interests of the two countries were not in fundamental conflict. Jimmy Carter and Deng Xiaoping not only reaffirmed that assessment but also recognized a basis for economic cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Guidance Note
    OPERATIONAL GUIDANCE NOTE CHINA OGN v.12 Issued October 2013 – updated 6 December 2014 OPERATIONAL GUIDANCE NOTE CHINA CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1.1 – 1.4 2. Country assessment 2.1 Actors of protection 2.2 Internal relocation 2.3 Country guidance caselaw 2.4 3. Main categories of claims 3.1 – 3.8 Falun Gong/Falun Dafa 3.9 Involvement with pro-Tibetan/pro/independence political organisations 3.10 Involvement with illegal religious organisations 3.11 Involvement with illegal political organisations or perceived political 3.12 opposition Forced abortion/sterilisation under ‘one child policy’ 3.13 Double Jeopardy 3.14 Civil protests and petitioners 3.15 Prison Conditions 3.16 4. Minors claiming in their own right 4.1 – 4.3 5. Medical Treatment 5.1 – 5.5 6. Returns 6.1 – 6.5 Decision makers assessing claims based on Christianity should refer to the Country Information and Guidance on: ► China: Christians, 13 June 2014 1. Introduction 1.1 This document provides Home Office caseworkers with guidance on the nature and handling of the most common types of claims received from nationals/residents of China, including whether claims are or are not likely to justify the granting of asylum, humanitarian protection or Discretionary Leave. Caseworkers must refer to the relevant Asylum Instructions for further details of the policy on these areas. 1.2 Caseworkers must not base decisions on the country of origin information in this guidance; it is included to provide context only and does not purport to be comprehensive. The conclusions in this guidance are based on the totality of the available evidence, not just the brief extracts contained herein, and caseworkers must likewise take into account all available evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared Statement of Xiaorong Li, Independent Scholar
    Prepared Statement of Xiaorong Li, Independent Scholar Congressional-Executive Commission on China Roundtable on "Current Conditions for Human Rights Defenders and Lawyers in China, and Implications for U.S. Policy" June 23, 2011 The serious backsliding of the Chinese government’s human rights records had started before the 2008 Summer Olympics, highlighted with the jailing of activists Hu Jia, Huang Qi, and many others, the torture and disappearance of lawyer Gao Zhisheng, the imprisonment of Nobel Peace Prize laureate Liu Xiaobo and house arrest of his wife, both incommunicado, and the house arrest of Chen Guangcheng after his release. Yesterday’s release of the artist Ai Weiwei on bail awaiting for trial was in the same fashion as his arrest: with disregard of the Chinese law. All these took place in the larger context of severe restrictions on freedom of expression and association, repression against religious and ethnic minorities, and significant roll-back on rule of law reform. Since February, several hundreds of people have been harassed or persecuted in one of the harshest crackdowns in recent years when the Chinese government tried to stamp out any sparks for protests in the Tunisia-style “Jasmine Revolution” after online calls first appeared. According to information documented by the group Chinese Human Rights Defenders, the Chinese government has criminally detained a total of 49 individuals, outside the Tibet and Xinjiang regions. As of today, nine of them have been formally arrested, three sent to Re-education through Labor (RTL) camps, 32 have been released but most of them not free: out of which 22 have been released on bail to await trial, while four remain in criminal detention.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RULE of LAW ORAL HISTORY PROJECT the Reminiscences Of
    THE RULE OF LAW ORAL HISTORY PROJECT The Reminiscences of Clive Stafford Smith Oral History Research Office Columbia University 2011 PREFACE The following oral history is the result of a recorded interview with Clive Stafford Smith conducted by Ronald J. Grele on June 28, June 29, and June 30, 2010 in Symondsbury, England. This interview is part of the Rule of Law Oral History Project. The reader is asked to bear in mind that s/he is reading a verbatim transcript of the spoken word, rather than written prose. MJD Session One Interviewee: Clive Stafford Smith Location: Symondsbury, Dorset, England Interviewer: Ronald J. Grele Date: June 28, 2010 Q: This is an interview with Clive Stafford Smith. The interview is being conducted in Dorset, in England. Today's date is June 28, 2010. The interviewer is Ronald Grele. This is an interview for the Columbia University Oral History Research Office. I thought where we would begin is where you begin your book [Bad Men: Guantánamo Bay and the Secret Prisons], and that is with 9/11. It is pretty detailed, your first memories of 9/11 being in Louisiana. But I have a couple of questions to ask you. Smith: Sure. Q: It isn't clear in there whether or not you watched the buildings collapse. Smith: Well, when it actually happened, no. I was driving around. I was actually trying to find a pathologist who I had an appointment to meet that morning on a death penalty case. I was driving around and it was just ghostly. This was Lake Charles, Louisiana, and there was nobody, anybody.
    [Show full text]