Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities GRS - S - 52 ISBN 978-3-939355-47-8 Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities Contents 1 Introduction The decommissioning of nuclear facilities is a challenge which the nuclear 1 Introduction 3 countries will need to address. According to information of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) of 2011, more than 500 reactors and about 2 Overview 4 275 nuclear fuel cycle facilities have been finally shut down until now. 2.1 Power and prototype reactors 6 2.2 Research reactors 8 After the end of their operational life, nuclear power plants cannot be left to 2.3 Nuclear fuel cycle facilities 9 their own. Since they still may pose a hazard, they have to be decommis- sioned in an orderly manner to protect man and the environment. The term 3 Decommissioning strategies 10 »decommissioning« refers to all measures carried out after granting of a decommissioning licence for a nuclear facility until official supervision i. e. 4 Step-wise dismantling of a nuclear power plant 12 nuclear regulatory supervision, is no longer necessary. This usually implies removal of all parts of the building and restoration of the site to its original 5 Licensing and supervisory procedures 14 condition in form of the so-called »green field«, as for example in the case 5.1 Legal framework 14 of the Niederaichbach nuclear power plant (u Fig. 1). 5.2 Licensing procedure 15 5.3 Supervisory procedure 15 6 Safety and radiation protection 16 6.1 Safety considerations 16 6.2 Radiation protection 18 6.3 Reportable events 19 7 Techniques 20 7.1 Decontamination techniques 20 7.2 Dismantling and disassembly techniques 22 7.3 Alternatives to on-site disassembly 23 8 Residue and waste management 24 8.1 Clearance 24 8.2 Decay storage 26 8.3 Radioactive waste 27 9 The costs 28 9.1 Costs borne by the power utilities 28 9.2 Costs borne by the public 28 9.3 Total costs 28 Imprint 10 International provisions 29 10.1 Convention on spent fuel and nuclear waste management 29 Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS) mbH 10.2 IAEA 29 10.3 OECD/NEA 29 Authors: Thorsten Stahl, Erik Strub, GRS 10.4 EU 29 Translation: Erika Schild, GRS 10.5 WENRA 29 Graphical editor: Vivian Scheithe, GRS Layout: Lengowski und Partner, Köln 11 Summary and outlook 30 Typesetting/printing: Media Cologne Kommunikationsmedien GmbH, Hürth 12 Annex 30 This document is a translation of the brochure »Stilllegung kerntechnischer 12.1 List on decommissioning of nuclear facilities in Germany 30 Anlagen« prepared by GRS on behalf of the BMU within the framework 12.2 Outline of selected decommissioning projects 32 of project 3610R03400. In case of discrepancies the German text shall prevail. 13 Glossary 36 Fig. 1: Dismantling of the Niederaichbach nuclear power plant 14 Photo credits 39 May 2012 2 3 Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities 2 Overview SUR-KI KGR In mid-2011, 16 nuclear power plants (power and prototype reactors) have The map in u Fig. 3 gives an overview of the facilities under decommis- Nuclear power plants and prototype reactors AVR Jülich experimental reactor been in different stages of decommissioning in Germany. In 2011, another sioning in Germany in mid-2011, or already dismantled completely. In SUR-HH HDR Großwelzheim superheated steam reactor KKS KGR Greifswald nuclear power plant (5 units) eight reactors were fi nally shut down and decommissioning will commence addition to the power and prototype reactors, these are research reactors KKN Niederaichbach nuclear power plant FRG-2 KKR Rheinsberg nuclear power plant in the next years. The remaining nine plants will be fi nally shut down in a and nuclear fuel cycle facilities. Not shown are facilities fi nally shut down, ANEX KKS Stade nuclear power plant stepwise process until 2022 due to the amendment of the Atomic Energy but not having been granted a decommissioning licence yet. OH KMK Mülheim-Kärlich nuclear power plant SUR-HB KKR KNK-II Karlsruhe compact sodium-cooled nuclear reactor KRB-A Gundremmingen nuclear power plant, Unit A Act of July 2011; one plant each by the end of 2015, 2017 and 2019 and KWL Lingen nuclear power plant KWO Obrigheim nuclear power plant another three plants until the end of 2021 and 2022. These plants will also KWW Würgassen nuclear power plant u Annex, Page 30). KWL SUR-B BER-I MZFR Karlsruhe multi-purpose research reactor be decommissioned after their fi nal shutdown ( THTR-300 Hamm-Uentrop thorium high-temperature nuclear reactor FRH VAK Kahl experimental nuclear power plant FMRB More than 30 research reactors of different size and more than 10 nuclear Research reactors fuel cycle facilities were fi nally shut down and were or will be decommis- ADIBKA L77A laboratory reactor ANEX Facility for zero power experiments sioned. At the site of the Greifswald nuclear power plant (KGR), Europe’s KWW BER-I Berlin experimental reactor 1 THTR-300 FMRB Braunschweig research and measuring reactor largest decommissioning project is being undertaken (u Fig. 2). FR-2 Karlsruhe, research reactor 2 FRF-1 Frankfurt research reactor 1 FRF-2 Frankfurt, research reactor 2 FRH Research reactor of the Hannover Medical School AVR RFR JUPITER ZLFR FRG-2 Geesthacht research reactor 2 FRJ-1 Jülich research reactor 1 (MERLIN) AMOR FRJ-2 Jülich research reactor 2 (DIDO) RRR FRM München research reactor ADIBKA FRJ-2 RAKE FRN Neuherberg research reactor FRJ-1 HOBEG KAHTER Critical facility with pebbly-type fuel for high temperature reactors KAHTER SBH-URAN KEITER In-core thermionic reactor critical experiments KEITER NUKEM-A SBH-MOX Leistungs-/ PrototypreaktorOH in StilllegungOtto Hahn nuclear ship KMK FRF-1 PR-10 PR-10 AEG test reactor Karlstein VAK Leistungs-/ Prototypreaktor,RAKE stillgelegtRossendorf assembly for critical experiments II FRF-2 TKA RFR Rossendorf research reactor Forschungsreaktor inRRR Stilllegung Rossendorf ring zone reactor SUR-DA SAR Siemens Argonaut reactor München SPGK SBWK Forschungsreaktor, stillgelegtSNEAK Karlsruhe fast zero energy assembly HDR STARK Karlsruhe fast-thermal Argonaut reactor TRIGA HD I Anlage der Ver- und SUAKEntsorgung Karlsruhe in Stilllegung fast subcritical assembly TRIGA HD II SUA Siemens subcritical assembly München KWO Anlage der Ver- und SUR-BEntsorgung, Siemens stillgelegt training reactor Berlin Fig. 2: Site of the Greifswald nuclear power plant SUR-DA Siemens training reactor Darmstadt KNK-II WAK MILLI SUR-HB Siemens training reactor Bremen MZFR PUTE SUR-HH Siemens training reactor Hamburg SUR-KA Siemens training reactor Karlsruhe SUR-KI Siemens training reactor Kiel FR-2 SNEAK KKN SUR-M Siemens training reactor München STARK TKA AEG Zero power reactor / thermal-critical assembly SUR-KA KRB-A TRIGA HD I Heidelberg research reactor TRIGA I SUAK TRIGA HD II Heidelberg research reactor TRIGA II FRN ZFLR Zittau training and research reactor FRM SAR SUA Nuclear fuel cycle facilities 2010_stl_01 SUR-M AMOR I-III Rossendorf facility for the production of Mo-99 HOBEG Hanau fuel fabrication plant for high-temperature reactors JUPITER Jülich pilot plant for thorium element reprocessing MILLI Karlsruhe milliton-scale reprocessing facility NUKEM-A NUKEM-A fuel fabrication plant PUTE Karlsruhe plutonium test extraction SBH-MOX Siemens fuel fabrication plant Hanau; MOX section SBH-Uran Siemens fuel fabrication plant Hanau; uranium section SBWK Siemens fuel fabrication plant Hanau; Karlstein site Power / prototype reactor under decommissioning Research reactor under decommissioning Nuclear fuel cycle facility under decommissioning SPGK Siemens Power Generation Karlstein Power / prototype reactor decommissioned Research reactor decommissioned Nuclear fuel cycle facility decommissioned WAK Karlsruhe reprocessing plant Fig. 3: Nuclear facilities decommissioned and under decommissioning in Germany. Not shown are facilities fi nally shut down, but not having been granted a decommissioning licence yet. In the course of the various decommissioning projects it turns out that • Research reactors, prototype reactors for electricity production and each project is actually carried out individually. The course of the project, prototype nuclear fuel cycle facilities are, on the other hand, established its fi nancing, the choice of decommissioning strategy and many other at research centres or universities. They are fi nanced publicly. The de- conditions strongly depend on the type of facility and on the owner commissioning of the Greifswald and Rheinsberg nuclear power plants (u Financing, Page 28): of the former GDR is fi nanced from the federal budget, just like the decommissioning and remediation of the uranium mining and proces- • Power reactors and plants for uranium enrichment and fuel fabrication sing facilities of the »Wismut« in Saxony and Thuringia. The following belong to the power utilities and the companies operating in this sector. sections explain the decommissioning processes for different types of facilities. 4 5 Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities 2.1 Power and prototype reactors Nuclear power plants (power and prototype reactors) convert the energy In Germany, two different types of nuclear power plants are being So far, three nuclear power plants have been completely dismantled: the Experience has shown that decommissioning of a power or prototype content of nuclear fuel (in the so-called fuel assemblies) into electrical operated, i. e. boiling water and pressurised water reactors. As shown Niederaichbach nuclear power plant (KKN), the Großwelzheim superheated reactor will take about 10 to 20 years, while the amount of waste can differ energy. In a controlled chain reaction, heat is generated by nuclear fi ssion. in u Fig. 4 und 5, both types use water as a coolant, but they differ, steam reactor (HDR) and the Kahl experimental nuclear power plant (VAK). signifi cantly (u Residue and waste management, Page 24). This heat is absorbed by a water circuit and is converted there into steam among other things, in the structure of the cooling circuit. The fi rst two plants are prototype reactors, whose development was not that drives turbines.
Recommended publications
  • 3 Electrical Cables
    Report by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB) on Topical Peer Review Ageing Management of Nuclear Power Plants and Research Reactors Publisher: Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB) Division RS I 5 · PO box 12 06 29 · 53048 Bonn · Germany E-Mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.bmub.bund.de Editors: Division RS I 5 (General and Fundamental Aspects of Reactor Safety, Nuclear Safety Codes and Standards, Multilateral Regulatory Cooperation) Date: 28th December 2017 Contents Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... V List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ VI Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................. VII Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 1 Preamble ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1 General information ................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Nuclear installations identification ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1.Climate Resilient Green Economy: Prospects
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS ISSN 2474 -5146 (Online) 1.CLIMATE RESILIENT GREEN ECONOMY: PROSPECTS Dr.R.RAGAPRIYA, I.A.S.,Managing Director, Gulbarga Electric Supply Company, Government of Karnataka. Prof.D.RUDRAPPAN, President, AMECA, Former Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Professor, Department of Development Economics, Ethiopian Civil Service University, Ethiopia. “The size and extent of the climate change ecosystem services were found to be degraded threats are new. It is arguably the biggest or used unsustainably. The gap between challenge humanity faces today. This the rich and poor has also been increasing- means that we must act urgently and seize between 1990 and 2005, income disparity opportunities quickly. One such opportunity (measured by the gap between the highest is renewable energy,” – President of the 72nd and lowest income earners) rose in more than UN General Assembly. two-thirds of countries. ABSTRACT The persistence of poverty and degradation of new political climate has grown in many the environment can be traced to a series of Acountries around the world, thanks to market and institutional failures that make the the strong base in science and widening prevailing economic theory far less effective public awareness of climate change and than it otherwise would be in advancing its risks. Clean energy revolution has been sustainable development ambitions. These taking place all over the developed countries, market and institutional failures are well underscored by the steady expansion of known to economists, but little progress has the renewable energy sector. The adoption been made to address them. For example, of Renewable Energy Technologies (RETs) there are not sufficient mechanisms to constituted a win-win situation, as renewable ensure that polluters pay the full cost of is not only green and job-generating, but their pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of Nuclear Facility Siting Using Coalition Opportunity Structures and the Advocacy Coalition Framework
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE ORDER IN A CHAOTIC SUBSYSTEM: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SITING USING COALITION OPPORTUNITY STRUCTURES AND THE ADVOCACY COALITION FRAMEWORK A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By KUHIKA GUPTA Norman, Oklahoma 2013 ORDER IN A CHAOTIC SUBSYSTEM: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SITING USING COALITION OPPORTUNITY STRUCTURES AND THE ADVOCACY COALITION FRAMEWORK A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE BY ______________________________ Dr. Hank C. Jenkins-Smith, Chair ______________________________ Dr. Carol L. Silva, Co-Chair ______________________________ Dr. Christopher M. Weible ______________________________ Dr. Deven E. Carlson ______________________________ Dr. Jill A. Irvine © Copyright by KUHIKA GUPTA 2013 All Rights Reserved. Dedication For my incredible parents, Anil and Alpana Gupta, for making all of this possible, and my husband, Joseph T. Ripberger, for being a constant inspiration. Acknowledgements This dissertation would not be possible were it not for the invaluable support I have received throughout my journey as an undergraduate at Delhi University in India, a graduate student at the University of Warwick in England, and my pursuit of a doctorate at the University of Oklahoma in the United States. During my time at Delhi University, Ramu Manivannan was an amazing mentor who taught me the value of making a difference in both academia and the real world. My greatest debt is to Hank Jenkins-Smith and Carol Silva at the University of Oklahoma, whose encouragement, guidance, and intellectual advice has made this journey possible. I am deeply grateful for their unending support; this dissertation would not exist without them.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Glossary 2007-06
    Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Technik und Umwelt GLOSSARY OF NUCLEAR TERMS Winfried Koelzer © Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH, Karlsruhe, April 2001 Postfach 3640 · 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany Original title: Lexikon zur Kernenergie, ISBN 3-923704-32-1 Translation by Informationskreis KernEnergie The reproduction of trade names, identifications, etc. in this glossary does not justify the assumption that such names may be considered free in the sense- of the laws regulating the protection of trade marks and brands and that therefore they may be used by everyone. No guarantee is given for the correctness of numerical data. Pictures by: Argonne National Lab., Argonne Aulis-Verlag Deubner & Co., Cologne Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe Informationskreis Kernenergie, Bonn A Absorbed dose The absorbed dose D is the quotient of the average energy transferred to the matter in a volume element by ionizing radiation and the mass of the matter in this volume element: _ d ε D = . dm The unit of the absorbed dose is joule divided by kilogram (J·kg-1) and its special unit name is gray (Gy). The former unit name was rad (symbol: rd or rad).1 Gy = 100 rd; 1 rd = 1/100 Gy. Absorbed dose rate Quotient of absorbed dose per unit of time. Unit: Gy/h. Absorber Any material "stopping" ionizing radiation. Alpha radiation can already be totally absorbed by a sheet of paper; beta radiation is absorbed by a few centimetres of plastic material or 1 cm of aluminium. Materials with a high →atomic number and high density are used for gamma radiation absorbers (lead, steel, concrete, partially with special additions). Neutron absorbers such as boron, hafnium and cadmium are used in control rods for reactors.
    [Show full text]
  • [Document Title]
    [EHNUR WP 4] ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER PLANT CONCEPTS AND TIMETABLES FOR THEIR COMMERCIAL DEPLOYMENT Steven C. Sholly1 VIENNA, June 2013 1 Institute of Safety/Security and Risk Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Copyright Vienna, June 2013 Media owner and editor: University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Department of Water, Atmosphere and Environment, Institute of Safety and Risk Sciences, Borkowskigasse 4, 1190 Wien, Austria URL: http://www.risk.boku.ac.at ReportWP4 – Advanced Nuclear Power Plant Concepts and Timetables EHNUR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Most currently operating nuclear power plants are Generation II reactors (except for a few remaining Generation I units and a few Generation III units). Generation III and Generation III+ nuclear power plant concepts are widely recognized to be significant improvements over Generation II reactor designs. Both Generation III designs (standardized designs safer than Generation II) and Generation III+ designs (standardized designs safer than Generation II and with the expectation of greater economy of scale) are available for immediate deployment. The absolute minimum schedule for a Generation III or III+ nuclear power plant project is 10 years from feasibility study to completion of startup testing. Such a schedule is only achievable by: (a) an experienced utility, (b) with the reactor sited at an existing nuclear power plant site, and (c) with a design for which first-of-a-kind engineering (FOAKE) is complete. Under other circumstances (e.g. a utility new to nuclear generation, a greenfield site, a utility in a country without significant nuclear infrastructure, a nuclear power plant design where FOAKE has not yet been accomplished), the schedule would extend from fifteen to seventeen years and perhaps more.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Problems Solved by Postgis Leo Hsu and Regina Obe
    TEN PROBLEMS SOLVED BY POSTGIS LEO HSU AND REGINA OBE Presented at PGConfUS 2017 Buy our books! at http://www.postgis.us/page_buy_book Books in progress: pgRouting: A Practical Guide PostgreSQL: Up and Running 3rd Edition 1 PROXIMITY ANALYSIS N closest things. Things within x distance of this. Things that are within another. Both 2 and 3d geometries, 2d geodetic (aka geography), and even raster. 2 . 1 EXAMPLE N­CLOSEST USING GEOGRAPHY DATA TYPE Closest 5 restaurants to here and kind of cuisine SELECT name, tags­>>'cuisine' As cuisine, ST_Point(­74.036,40.724)::geography <­> geog As dist_meters FROM nj_pois As pois WHERE tags @> '{"amenity":"restaurant"}'::jsonb ORDER BY dist_meters LIMIT 5; name | cuisine | dist_meters ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Chilis | mexican | 183.749762473017 Battello | italian | 337.82552535307 Park and Sixth | american | 631.058208835878 Taphouse | NULL | 740.060280459834 The Kitchen at Grove Station | seasonal new american | 764.554569258853 2 . 2 GEOGRAPHY WITHIN 1000 METERS OF LOCATION Works for geometry as well, but measurements and coordinates are in units of the geometry, not always meters. SELECT name, tags­>>'amenity' As type, tags­>>'cuisine' AS cuisine, ST_Distance(pois.geog,ref.geog) As FROM nj_pois AS pois, (SELECT ST_Point(­74.036,40.724)::geography) As ref(geog) WHERE tags ? 'cuisine' AND ST_DWithin(pois.geog,ref.geog,1000) ORDER BY dist_m; name | type | cuisine | dist_m ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Chilis | restaurant | mexican | 183.54545201 Battello | restaurant | italian | 338.39714681 Starbucks | cafe | coffee_shop | 350.25322227 Park and Sixth | restaurant | american | 632.12204878 Torico Ice Cream | fast_food | ice_cream | 741.32599554 The Kitchen at Grove Station | restaurant | seasonal new american | 764.72996783 Rustique | restaurant | italian | 822.04122537 Helen's Pizza | restaurant | pizza_Italian | 866.65681852 2 .
    [Show full text]
  • Public Preferences Related to Consent-Based Siting Of
    Public Preferences Related to Consent-Based Siting of Radioactive Waste Management Facilities for Storage and Disposal: Analyzing Variations over Time, Events, and Program Designs Prepared for US Department of Energy Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation Planning Project Hank C. Jenkins-Smith Carol L. Silva Kerry G. Herron Kuhika G. Ripberger Matthew Nowlin Joseph Ripberger Center for Risk and Crisis Management, University of Oklahoma Evaristo “Tito” Bonano Rob P. Rechard Sandia National Laboratories February 2013 FCRD-NFST-2013-000076 SAND 2013-0032P Public Preferences Related to Consent Based Siting of Radioactive Waste Management Facilities ii February 2013 DISCLAIMER This information was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness, of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. References herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the US Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Baseload Operation in Nuclear Power Plants: Load Following and Frequency Control Modes of Flexible Operation No
    IAEA Nuclear Energy Series IAEA Nuclear No. NP-T-3.23 No. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series Non-baseload Operation in Nuclear Power Plants: Load Following and Frequency Control Modes of Flexible Operation Control Modes of Flexible Plants: Load Following and Frequency Power Non-baseload Operation in Nuclear No. NP-T-3.23 Basic Non-baseload Principles Operation in Nuclear Power Plants: Objectives Load Following and Frequency Control Guides Modes of Flexible Operation Technical Reports @ IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES PUBLICATIONS STRUCTURE OF THE IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES Under the terms of Articles III.A and VIII.C of its Statute, the IAEA is authorized to foster the exchange of scientific and technical information on the peaceful uses of atomic energy. The publications in the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series provide information in the areas of nuclear power, nuclear fuel cycle, radioactive waste management and decommissioning, and on general issues that are relevant to all of the above mentioned areas. The structure of the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series comprises three levels: 1 — Basic Principles and Objectives; 2 — Guides; and 3 — Technical Reports. The Nuclear Energy Basic Principles publication describes the rationale and vision for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Nuclear Energy Series Objectives publications explain the expectations to be met in various areas at different stages of implementation. Nuclear Energy Series Guides provide high level guidance on how to achieve the objectives related to the various topics and areas involving the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Nuclear Energy Series Technical Reports provide additional, more detailed information on activities related to the various areas dealt with in the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Energy Utilization in the Federal Republic of Germany 2015
    State and Development of Nuclear Energy Utilization in the Federal Republic of Germany 2015 Department of Nuclear Safety Ines Bredberg Johann Hutter Kerstin Kühn Katarzyna Niedzwiedz Frank Philippczyk Achim Thömmes BfS-SK-28/16 Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokuments immer auf folgende URN: urn:nbn:de:0221-2016072114054 Zur Beachtung: BfS-Berichte und BfS-Schriften können von den Internetseiten des Bundesamtes für Strahlenschutz unter http://www.bfs.de kostenlos als Volltexte heruntergeladen werden. Salzgitter, Juli 2016 State and Development of Nuclear Energy Utilization in the Federal Republic of Germany 2015 Department of Nuclear Safety Ines Bredberg Johann Hutter Kerstin Kühn Katarzyna Niedzwiedz Frank Philippczyk Achim Thömmes CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................................. 6 1 ELECTRIC ENERGY PRODUCTION IN GERMANY ............................................. 11 1.1 GENERAL .......................................................................................................................................... 11 1.2 THE RENEWABLE ENERGIES ACT ................................................................................................ 12 1.3 PHASE-OUT OF ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION THROUGH NUCLEAR ENERGY ........................ 12 1.3.1 Consequences of the reactor accident in Fukushima ......................................................................... 12 1.3.2 Current nuclear legislation in Germany .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Nuclear Terms
    GLOSSARY OF NUCLEAR TERMS Winfried Koelzer © Karlsruhe Institute for Technology, Karlsruhe, January 2013 Postfach 3640 · 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany Original title: Lexikon zur Kernenergie, ISBN 3-923704-32-1 Translaton by Informationskreis KernEnergie The reproduction of trade names, identifications, etc. in this glossary does not justify the assumption that such names may be considered free in the- sense of the laws regulating the protection of trade marks and brands and that therefore they may be used by everyone. No guarantee is given for the correctness of numerical data. Pictures by: Argonne National Lab., Argonne Aulis-Verlag Deubner & Co., Cologne Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, Karlsruhe Informationskreis Kernenergie, Berlin A Absorbed dose The absorbed dose D is the quotient of the average energy transferred to the matter in a volume element by ionizing radiation and the mass of the matter in this volume element: _ d ε D = . dm The unit of the absorbed dose is joule divided by kilogram (J·kg-1) and its special unit name is gray (Gy). The former unit name was rad (symbol: rd or rad).1 Gy = 100 rd; 1 rd = 1/100 Gy. Absorbed dose rate Quotient of absorbed dose per unit of time. Unit: Gy/h. Absorber Any material "stopping" ionizing radiation. Alpha radiation can already be totally absorbed by a sheet of paper; beta radiation is absorbed by a few centimetres of plastic material or 1 cm of aluminium. Materials with a high →atomic number and high density are used for gamma radiation absorbers (lead, steel, concrete, partially with special additions). Neutron absorbers such as boron, hafnium and cadmium are used in control rods for reactors.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management
    Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management Report of the Federal Republic of Germany for the Sixth Review Meeting in May 2018 Table of Contents - 3 - Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... 8 List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... 11 List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. 14 Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 21 A Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 31 A.1 Structure and content of the report ........................................................................... 31 A.2 Historical development and current status of utilisation of nuclear energy .......... 32 A.3 Overview ..................................................................................................................... 42 B Policies and practices ......................................................................................................... 45 B.1 Reporting ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • State and Development of Nuclear Energy Utilization in the Federal Republic of Germany 2016
    State and Development of Nuclear Energy Utilization in the Federal Republic of Germany 2016 Department of Nuclear Safety and Supervision in Nuclear Waste Management Ines Bredberg (BfE) Johann Hutter (BfE) Kerstin Kühn (BfE) Katarzyna Niedzwiedz (BfE) Frank Philippczyk (BfE) Achim Thömmes (BfS) BfE-KE-02/17 Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokuments immer auf folgende URN: urn:nbn:de:0221-2017091814397 Zur Beachtung: BfE-Berichte und BfE-Schriften können von den Internetseiten des Bundesamtes für kerntechnische Entsorgungssicherheit unter http://www.bfe.bund.de kostenlos als Volltexte heruntergeladen werden. Salzgitter, Oktober 2017 State and Development of Nuclear Energy Utilization in the Federal Republic of Germany 2016 Department of Nuclear Safety and Supervision in Nuclear Waste Management Ines Bredberg (BfE) Johann Hutter (BfE) Kerstin Kühn (BfE) Katarzyna Niedzwiedz (BfE) Frank Philippczyk (BfE) Achim Thömmes (BfS) CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 6 1 ELECTRIC ENERGY PRODUCTION IN GERMANY ............................................................ 11 1.1 GENERAL .............................................................................................................................................. 11 1.2 THE RENEWABLE ENERGIES ACT ........................................................................................................... 12 1.3 PHASE-OUT OF ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION THROUGH
    [Show full text]