Advantages and Disadvantages of Using the Internal Thoracic Artery Perforators As Recipient Vessels in Autologous Breast Reconstruction—A Narrative Review
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
7 Review Article Page 1 of 7 Advantages and disadvantages of using the internal thoracic artery perforators as recipient vessels in autologous breast reconstruction—a narrative review Suzanne M. Beecher^ Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Dublin, Ireland Correspondence to: Suzanne M. Beecher. Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Email: [email protected]. Abstract: The rates of breast reconstruction after mastectomy are rising each year. Autologous breast reconstruction using free tissue transfer is considered the gold standard reconstruction, especially with recent controversy surrounding breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). During free tissue transfer, the flap vessels must be anastomosed to recipient vessels on the chest wall. There are multiple options of recipient vessels during microvascular breast reconstruction. Most commonly, the thoracodorsal vessels or the internal thoracic vessels [also known as the internal mammary (IM) vessels] are used as the recipient vessels for microvascular anastomosis of the free tissue transfer. Other second-line options include the thoracoacromial axis and the lateral thoracic vessels. The use of perforators of the internal thoracic vessels for free flap anastomosis during autologous breast reconstruction has been in use for almost twenty years. They are generally favoured over use of thoracodorsal vessels as they result in medialisation of the flap. In recent years, the use of perforators of the internal thoracic vessels has become popular. Great debate surrounds whether or not they should be used as recipient vessels as opposed to the conventional main vessels. In this article, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both techniques to guide the choice of reconstructive microsurgeons. Keywords: Internal mammary perforators (IM perforators); internal thoracic artery (ITA); breast reconstruction; microvascular reconstruction Received: 20 April 2020; Accepted: 08 January 2021; Published: 30 June 2021. doi: 10.21037/abs-20-50 View this article at: http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/abs-20-50 Introduction the abdomen or the thigh. The vessels require anastomosis to native vessels in the region of the breast. The recipient The rates of breast reconstruction are rising internationally. vessels for anastomosis are usually the thoracodorsal or Breast reconstruction has been shown to have psychological benefits for patients. Autologous reconstruction is becoming the internal thoracic vessels [also known as the internal very popular as it uses the patient’s own tissue. It is also a mammary (IM) vessels]. Other secondary options, though better option compared to prosthetic implants if adjuvant rarely used, include the thoracoacromial and the lateral radiotherapy is required. thoracic vessels (1). In recent years, the use of perforators During autologous breast reconstruction, a flap of tissue of the internal thoracic vessels has become popular. Great is transferred from elsewhere in the body, from sites such as debate surrounds whether or not they should be used ^ ORCID: 0000-0001-6489-3424. © Annals of Breast Surgery. All rights reserved. Ann Breast Surg 2021;5:16 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/abs-20-50 Page 2 of 7 Annals of Breast Surgery, 2021 as recipient vessels as opposed to the conventional main use for a secondary latissimus dorsi flap in the case of flap vessels. In this article, we discuss the advantages and failure (10). The internal thoracic arteries bilaterally are disadvantages of the recipient vessels in microvascular breast good size matches for the deep inferior epigastric artery, as reconstruction. A review of the literature was performed, is the right internal thoracic vein. The left internal thoracic with relevant articles obtained from SCOPUS and Medline. vein however, is often much smaller than the deep inferior We present the following article in accordance with the epigastric vein, which may lead to vessel size mismatch Narrative Review reporting checklist (available at http:// during microsurgical anastomosis (3). The thoracodorsal dx.doi.org/10.21037/abs-20-50). and internal thoracic vessels when used as recipients for free flap anastomosis have a similar rate of complications, however, use of the internal thoracic vessels may be Thoracodorsal vessels associated with a higher rate of nipple necrosis in immediate The thoracodorsal were previously the vessels of choice. nipple-sparing reconstruction (11). The thoracodorsal vessels however are potentially damaged The ITA is a branch of the subclavian artery. It passes during axillary clearances. Even if still present, during inferiorly and 1–2 cm lateral to the sternal border, dividing delayed breast reconstruction, there is often a significant into its terminal branches at the level of the sixth rib. Its amount of scarring in the region of the axilla due to prior terminal branches are the superior epigastric artery and surgery or radiotherapy, which may make dissection of the the musculophrenic artery. In addition to these terminal thoracodorsal axis technically difficult (2). When using the branches, the ITA gives off medial and lateral branches. thoracodorsal vessels, a longer vascular pedicle is required The medial branches give supply to the area surrounding on the free flap. There may also be a reduction of tissue the sternum. The lateral branches include the anterior available to reconstruct volume in the medial aspect of the IC arteries, which supply the ribcage, with two branches breast due to the flap being placed laterally in the breast (2). to each IC space. The branches at the lower IC spaces With the advent of sentinel node biopsy, axillary node are larger, with the largest being in the 5th and 6th IC clearances are not always required. Because of this, there spaces (7). Laterally there are also branches to pectoralis has been a decline in the use of the thoracodorsal axis major. Also, arising from the lateral border of the ITA, as it is generally not exposed, as would’ve been the case the anterior ICs or the muscular branches are cutaneous when patients underwent node clearances (3). Also, if the perforators that supply the skin. The ITA gives blood thoracodorsal vessels are used at the time of sentinel node supply to approximately 60% of the breast parenchyma (12). biopsy, if a subsequent axillary node clearance is required, The cutaneous vascular territory of the ITA extends from the pedicle may be potentially compromised (4). the midline medially to the mid-clavicular line, two to three centimeters lateral to the nipple laterally. Cranially, it extends to the inferior border of the clavicle. The caudal Internal thoracic vessels border of the skin territory supplied can vary between the The use of the internal thoracic axis as the recipient vessel ninth rib to the umbilicus (7). was first described by Harashina et al. in 1980 (5). The There are however disadvantages to using internal internal thoracic vessels have the advantage of being a good thoracic vessels for free flap anastomosis. In order to size match to the flap pedicle, and also the site is more anastomose the free flap pedicle to the internal thoracic accessible for performing microsurgery (6). The average vessels, a section of cartilage is often removed in order diameter of the internal thoracic artery (ITA) is 3.6 mm to gain access to the vessels. There are multiple methods and the average size of the vein is also 3.6 mm (7). At the to remove the rib, but often the methods described by third intercostal (IC) space, the vessels are consistently of Haddock et al is employed, with removal of the cartilage adequate caliber for anastomosis (8). Using the internal piecemeal with a rongeur until the posterior perichondrium thoracic vessels also allows for easier positioning of the flap, is exposed (13). Rib resection can be quite painful, and and also there is a lower risk of avulsion injury and shoulder resection of cartilage and surgery in this area may result in stiffness due to shoulder immobilisation when using the chronic IC neuralgia (14). Pain can result in post-operative thoracodorsal axis for flap anastomosis. A shorter pedicle is atelectasis due to a reduction in deep breathing (15). required to optimally position the flap on the chest wall (9). Another potential disadvantage of cartilage or rib resection Its use may also preserve the thoracodorsal vessels for is that it may result in a contour deformity on the chest wall © Annals of Breast Surgery. All rights reserved. Ann Breast Surg 2021;5:16 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/abs-20-50 Annals of Breast Surgery, 2021 Page 3 of 7 A B C D Figure 1 Costal cartilage banking and use in nipple reconstruction. (10,16). This may require fat grafting to correct (17). One vessels a pneumothorax may also occur (22). Another, benefit to rib resection is that the cartilage can be banked more disadvantageous sequelae are that using the internal and subsequently used during nipple reconstruction to give thoracic vessels for free flap anastomosis would mean the the nipple support (Figure 1) (18). vessels would be removed as a potential donor for coronary Of note, there is however a rib sparing technique that artery bypass grafting. Radiotherapy is a common adjunct to can be performed that prevents a contour deformity and treatment of breast cancer. These patients are at higher risk results in less pain. This involves elevating an area of the for coronary artery disease due the effects of radiotherapy IC muscle in the second or third IC space (9,10). The on the cardiac vasculature. This may mean this cohort of second IC space is the largest IC space (19). This may patients may need coronary artery bypass grafting in the not be feasible in the presence of a bifid rib (20). In the future (23). The ITA is the vessel of choice for surgeons case of the patient who has had previous radiotherapy performing bypass grafting (24). Sacrifice of this vessel however, the segment of ITA that is behind the rib has may also lead to complications in sternal wound closure less damage due to the radiotherapy, which may be more during cardiothoracic surgery (25).