DOCSLIB.ORG

INTENTIONALLY BLANK - Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INTENTIONALLY BLANK - Table of Contents - INTENTIONALLY BLANK - Table of Contents 2012 SURF Program Student Abstracts at NIST Gaithersburg, MD ............................................................... 11 Alabama A & M University Shannon Hines ...................................................................................................................................... 11 Justin Lewis .......................................................................................................................................... 11 Tamika Ragland .................................................................................................................................... 11 American University Elizabeth Ghias ..................................................................................................................................... 12 Matthew Tweardy ................................................................................................................................. 13 Brian Weinstein .................................................................................................................................... 13 Andrews University Thomas Zirkle ...................................................................................................................................... 14 Appalachian State University Zachary Pruett ...................................................................................................................................... 14 John Villanova ...................................................................................................................................... 15 Arizona State University Abbas Jaber .......................................................................................................................................... 16 Katelyn Keberle .................................................................................................................................... 16 Arad Lajevardi-Khosh .......................................................................................................................... 16 Stuart Ness ............................................................................................................................................ 17 Daniel Stehlik ....................................................................................................................................... 17 Augsburg College Nathaniel Ly ......................................................................................................................................... 18 Bridgewater College Matthew Cline ...................................................................................................................................... 19 Brigham Young University Lisa Bendall .......................................................................................................................................... 19 David Richardson ................................................................................................................................. 20 Brown University Joshua Cohen ........................................................................................................................................ 20 Jonathan Schear .................................................................................................................................... 21 California State University Fresno Pahoua Xiong ....................................................................................................................................... 22 Carnegie Mellon University Madeline Cramer .................................................................................................................................. 22 Divya Mouli.......................................................................................................................................... 23 Tom Mullins ......................................................................................................................................... 23 Graham Spicer ...................................................................................................................................... 23 3 College of William and Mary Matthew Blum ...................................................................................................................................... 24 Colorado School of Mines Bryce Thurston ..................................................................................................................................... 24 Joseph Whalen ...................................................................................................................................... 25 Columbia University in the City of New York Ashley Newton ..................................................................................................................................... 25 John Orthwein ...................................................................................................................................... 26 DePauw University Catherine Baker .................................................................................................................................... 27 Zachary Keller ...................................................................................................................................... 27 George Washington University Shelly Bagchi........................................................................................................................................ 27 Caroline Litchfield ................................................................................................................................ 28 Julian Lee.............................................................................................................................................. 28 Georgetown University Julian Lee.............................................................................................................................................. 28 Georgia Institute of Technology Max Carlson ......................................................................................................................................... 29 Gonzaga University Taylor Brown........................................................................................................................................ 30 Samantha Engel .................................................................................................................................... 30 Goucher College Julian Irwin ........................................................................................................................................... 31 Gustavus Adolphus College Jenna Legatt .......................................................................................................................................... 31 Hampton University Charles Scott ......................................................................................................................................... 32 Courtney Smith ..................................................................................................................................... 32 Hood College Andrea Haines ...................................................................................................................................... 33 Rachel Meyer........................................................................................................................................ 34 Louisiana State University Chase Brignac ....................................................................................................................................... 34 4 Loyola University Maryland Andrew Gorbaty ................................................................................................................................... 35 Allison Rose ......................................................................................................................................... 35 Miami University of Ohio Alexis Denton ....................................................................................................................................... 35 Millersville University of Pennsylvania Ryan Consylman .................................................................................................................................. 36 Edward Kimmel .................................................................................................................................... 36 Wayne Treible ...................................................................................................................................... 37 Montgomery College Katie Hafner ......................................................................................................................................... 37 Mount Saint Mary’s University Lance Dockery ...................................................................................................................................... 38 New College of Florida Sophie Lang .......................................................................................................................................... 38 North Georgia College & State University Matthew Jones ...................................................................................................................................... 39 Deborah Leman ...................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Contents Articles
    Volume 97, Number 5, September-October 1992 Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Contents Articles The Characterization of a Piston Displacement-Type G. E. Mattingly 509 Flowmeter Calibration Facility and the Calibration and Use of Pulsed Output Type Flowmeters A General Waveguide Circuit Theory Roger B. Marks and 533 Dylan F. Williams Resistive Liquid-Vapor Surface Sensors for Liquid J. D. Siegwarth, R. 0. Voth, 563 Nitrogen and Hydrogen and S. M. Snyder Fracture Toughness of Advanced Ceramics George D. Quinn, Jonathan 579 at Room Temperature Salem, Isa Bar-on, Kyu Cho, Michael Foley, and Ho Fang Errata Erratum: Optical Calibration of a Submicrometer Jon Geist, Barbara Belzer, 609 Magnification Standard Mary Lou Miller, and Peter Roitman ConferenceReports Data Administration Management Association Symposium Judith Newton 611 News Briefs GENERAL DEVELOPMENTS 615 Consortium to Develop Ceramic Machining Data Industry/NIST to Improve Advanced Polymer Systems Frequency Calibrations Using LORAN-C Explained Technology Centers Created for California, Minnesota 616 CRADA Partners to Study Concrete Failure During Fire Have You Heard? New Noise Standard Developed "Superconductivity Report" Now Available on VHS Two Views of Protein Puzzles Prove Better Than One Volume 97, Number 5, September-October 1992 Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology New Biosensor Consortium Seeks Members 617 NIST/Industry to Study Cryptography Infrastructures Standards Needs on Diamond Films Cited
    [Show full text]
  • Diamond Machining of Silicon: a Review of Advances in Molecular Dynamics Simulation
    Diamond machining of silicon: A review of advances in molecular dynamics simulation Goel, S., Luo, X., Agrawal, A., & Reuben, R. L. (2015). Diamond machining of silicon: A review of advances in molecular dynamics simulation. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 88, 131-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.09.013 Published in: International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2014 Elsevier This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, [VOL 88, (January 2015)] doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.09.013 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Fabrication of Nonconventional Optical Components by Precision Glass Molding
    Design and Fabrication of Nonconventional Optical Components by Precision Glass Molding DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Peng He Graduate Program in Industrial and Systems Engineering The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Allen Y. Yi, Advisor Dr. Jose M. Castro Dr. L. James Lee Copyright by Peng He 2014 Abstract Precision glass molding is a net-shaping process to fabricate glass optics by replicating optical features from precision molds to glass at elevated temperature. The advantages of precision glass molding over traditional glass lens fabrication methods make it especially suitable for the production of optical components with complicated geometries, such as aspherical lenses, diffractive hybrid lenses, microlens arrays, etc. Despite of these advantages, a number of problems must be solved before this process can be used in industrial applications. The primary goal of this research is to determine the feasibility and performance of nonconventional optical components formed by precision glass molding. This research aimed to investigate glass molding by combing experiments and finite element method (FEM) based numerical simulations. The first step was to develop an integrated compensation solution for both surface deviation and refractive index drop of glass optics. An FEM simulation based on Tool-Narayanaswamy-Moynihan (TNM) model was applied to predict index drop of the molded optical glass. The predicted index value was then used to compensate for the optical design of the lens. Using commercially available general purpose software, ABAQUS, the entire process of glass molding was simulated to calculate the surface deviation from the adjusted lens geometry, which was applied to final mold shape modification.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Precision Micro-Machining of Glass for Mass-Personalization and Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Of
    High-precision micro-machining of glass for mass-personalization Lucas Abia Hof A Thesis In the Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Aerospace Engineering Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Mechanical Engineering) at Concordia University Montreal, Québec, Canada June 2018 © Lucas Abia Hof, 2018 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY School of Graduate Studies This is to certify that the thesis prepared By: Lucas Abia Hof Entitled: High-precision micro-machining of glass for mass-personalization and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Mechanical Engineering) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final examining committee: ______________________________________ Chair Dr. K. Schmitt ______________________________________ External Examiner Dr. P. Koshy ______________________________________ External to Program Dr. M. Nokken ______________________________________ Examiner Dr. C. Moreau ______________________________________ Examiner Dr. R. Sedaghati ______________________________________ Thesis Supervisor Dr. R. Wüthrich Approved by: ___________________________________________________ Dr. A. Dolatabadi, Graduate Program Director August 14, 2018 __________________________________________________ Dr. A. Asif, Dean Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science Abstract High-precision micro-machining of glass for mass- personalization Lucas Abia Hof,
    [Show full text]
  • Three Meter Capacity Diamond Turning Machine for X-Ray Telescope Components
    Dallas Optical Systems, Inc. NASA RFI Solicitation: NNH11ZDA018L Three Meter Capacity Diamond Turning Machine For X-Ray Telescope Components Enabling Technology: A 3 meter capacity diamond turning machine will be enabling technology for low cost fabrication of x-ray telescope optical components. Three Meter Capacity Diamond Turning Machine For X-Ray Telescope Components Submitted by: John M. Casstevens, President email: [email protected] Dallas Optical Systems, Inc. 1790 Connie Lane Rockwall, Texas 75032-6708 The technology readiness level (TRL) for this technology is 5 to 6. Based on previous experience of building a similar machine and facility the rough order of magnitude cost to establish the proposed capability to manufacture and certify x-ray mirror glass slumping mandrels meeting IXO specifications will not exceed $300M. Identification and Significance of the Enabling Technical Innovation The ranking of IXO as the fourth-priority large space mission in the National Academy Astro2010 Decadal Report reflects the technical, cost, and programmatic uncertainties associated with the project at the current time. A major emphasis in achieving a successful IXO is reducing the cost of the grazing incidence mirrors. Diamond turning has been proven to be able to produce highly aspheric optical contours to visible wavelength tolerances with extremely smooth surfaces. Diamond turning has the additional enabling capability to not only produce extremely smooth and accurate optical surfaces but also mechanical attachment surfaces and datums which allow extremely fast and complex optical components to be quickly and easily aligned. The productivity of diamond turning allows the production of quantities of optical components with exacting duplication of optical surfaces and metrology datums.
    [Show full text]
  • Diamond Turning of Glassy Polymers
    Diamond turning of glassy polymers Citation for published version (APA): Gubbels, G. P. H. (2006). Diamond turning of glassy polymers. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. https://doi.org/10.6100/IR613637 DOI: 10.6100/IR613637 Document status and date: Published: 01/01/2006 Document Version: Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers) Please check the document version of this publication: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.
    [Show full text]
  • Enabling the Production of Aspheric Glass Lenses with Diffractive Structures K
    Proceedings of the 11th euspen International Conference – Como – May 2011 Enabling the Production of Aspheric Glass Lenses with Diffractive Structures K. Georgiadis1,2, B. Bulla1, D. Hollstegge1, O. Dambon1, F. Klocke1,2 1Fraunhofer Institute for Production Technology, Germany 2Fraunhofer Project Center for Coatings in Manufacturing, Germany [email protected] Abstract The demand for complex-shaped optical components is rising rapidly, driven by their significant advantages over traditional optics. A great example are lenses that combine aspherical surfaces and diffraction gratings. These can eliminate spherical as well as chromatic aberrations in imaging optics and can therefore replace multi-lens optical systems. Although glass aspheric lenses or lenses with diffraction gratings can be manufactured by various production technologies, the production of glass lenses that combine both was not possible until now. In this paper, the development of a production method of such lenses using precision glass moulding is presented. 1 Introduction Precision glass moulding is a replicative technology, where a glass blank is heated and isothermally pressed to the desired shape between ultra-precision moulds. After the moulding process, no further processing is necessary [1]. Usually, binderless cemented tungsten carbide is precision ground to form the moulding tools, which are then coated with noble metal coatings in order to reduce the chemical interactions with the glass and increase their lifetime [2-3]. In order to manufacture diffractive structures on an aspheric surface, diamond turning must be used, since only this technology enables the production of the very fine and sharp structures required. The problem is that not all materials can be diamond turned.
    [Show full text]
  • PRECISION DIAMOND TURNING of AEROSPACE OPTICAL SYSTEMS the Environment Housing the Diamond Turning Lathe Should Be Maintained to ± 0.01°F
    PRACTICE NO. PD-ED-1265 PAGE 1 OF 4 PREFERRED PRECISION DIAMOND TURNING OF RELIABILITY PRACTICES AEROSPACE OPTICAL SYSTEMS Guideline: Meticulous control of vibration, environmental factors, and machining parameters are required to produce precision diffractive, refractive, reflective and hybrid optical components for aerospace applications. Benefits: Highly reliable diffractive, refractive, reflective, and hybrid aerospace optical systems can be produced by a meticulously controlled and protected diamond turning process. The result can be rugged, temperature-compensating achromatic precision optical elements suitable for a wide variety of applications. Center to Contact for More Information: Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) Implementation: Diamond turning is a well-established fabrication process for shaping high quality optical surfaces on metals, polymers, and crystals. Diamond turning has the capability of precision machining with a single point cutting tool to an accuracy of a fraction of a wavelength of light which makes it suitable for fabricating lenses. The surface finish quality of diamond turning is satisfactory for optical components in the mid to long wavelength regions of the infrared spectrum. Diamond machining can be beneficial for metal mirrors because of the ability to machine a reflective surface directly onto a structural substrate which may contain mounting bosses, alignment flanges, and rib reinforcements. The precision to which components can be machined is partially dependant upon the extent to which the dynamic motion of the machine tool can be controlled with the work piece. The detrimental dynamics of the diamond turning machine can be minimized by stiffening the machine, or mounting it on a vibration isolating mount. Vibration can be reduced by mounting the machine on a block of granite, or in-ground concrete blocks surrounded with vibration isolation material.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultrasonically Assisted Single Point Diamond Turning of Optical Mold of Tungsten Carbide
    micromachines Article Ultrasonically Assisted Single Point Diamond Turning of Optical Mold of Tungsten Carbide Zhanjie Li 1, Gang Jin 1,*, Fengzhou Fang 2, Hu Gong 2 and Haili Jia 1 1 Tianjin Key Laboratory of High Speed Cutting and Precision Machining, Tianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin 300222, China; [email protected] (Z.L.); [email protected] (H.J.) 2 State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology & Instruments, College of Precision Instrument and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; [email protected] (F.F.); [email protected] (H.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 10 January 2018; Accepted: 8 February 2018; Published: 12 February 2018 Abstract: To realize high efficiency, low/no damage and high precision machining of tungsten carbide used for lens mold, a high frequency ultrasonic vibration cutting system was developed at first. Then, tungsten carbide was precisely machined with a polycrystalline diamond (PCD) tool assisted by the self-developed high frequency ultrasonic vibration cutting system. Tool wear mechanism was investigated in ductile regime machining of tungsten carbide. The cutter back-off phenomenon in the process was analyzed. The subsequent experimental results of ultra-precision machining with a single crystal diamond tool showed that: under the condition of high frequency ultrasonic vibration cutting, nano-scale surface roughness can be obtained by the diamond tool with smaller tip radius and no defects like those of ground surface were found on the machined surface. Tool wear mechanisms of the single crystal diamond tool are mainly abrasive wear and micro-chipping. To solve the problem, a method of inclined ultrasonic vibration cutting with negative rake angle was put forward according to force analysis, which can further reduce tool wear and roughness of the machined surface.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Machining Plastic Optics
    PRECISION ENGINEERING CONSORTIUM 2017 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME XXXI January 2018 Sponsors: Los Alamos National Laboratory Oculus VR Faculty: Thomas Dow Ronald Scattergood David Muddiman Mark Pankow Victoria Miller Brendan O’Connor Graduate Students: Charan Bodlapti Noa McNutt Undergraduate Students: Alyssa Edwards Staff: Kenneth Garrard Anthony Wong Beth Deakle Consultants: Karl J. Falter Stephen Furst Proprietary Release subject to the terms and conditions of the Precision Engineering Consortium Membership Agreement and North Carolina State University Office of Technology Transfer nondisclosure agreements. Table of Contents Summary i 1. Balloon Experimental Twin Telescopes for Infrared Interferometry Ken Garrard, Stephen Furst and Thomas Dow 1 2. The Role of Built Up Edge in Diamond Tool Wear When Machining Steel Brandon Suit and Thomas Dow 29 3. Machining Plastic Optics Charan Bodlapati, Anthony Wong and Thomas Dow 57 4. Selection of Surrogate Material to Study Dry Machining of Plutonium Noa McNutt, Thomas Dow, Alyssa Edwards, Ken Garrard and Anthony Wong 81 5. Finding Natural Frequency of a Piezoelectric Load Cell Alyssa Edwards and Thomas Dow 115 6. Microscale Lens Array: Focused Ion Beam Milling of Microscale Features Anthony Wong 125 7. Multi Lens Array – II: Indentation and Creation of the Mold Gaurav Dave, Sriraghav Sridharan and Mark Pankow 143 8. High Spatial Resolution Infrared Mass Spectrometry Imaging Mark Bokhart, Milad Nazari, Måns Ekelöf, Ken Garrard, Jeffrey Manni and David Muddiman 163 9. Mass Spectrometry Imaging Software
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Listings
    Abstract of Papers Submitted to 2017 MSEC‐NAMRC‐ICMP 1 Paper Number Page Paper Number Page Paper Number Page Paper Number Page MSEC2017‐2603 5 MSEC2017‐2702 18 MSEC2017‐2771 29 MSEC2017‐2835 41 MSEC2017‐2604 5 MSEC2017‐2703 18 MSEC2017‐2773 30 MSEC2017‐2839 42 MSEC2017‐2605 5 MSEC2017‐2704 19 MSEC2017‐2774 30 MSEC2017‐2840 42 MSEC2017‐2611 6 MSEC2017‐2705 19 MSEC2017‐2775 30 MSEC2017‐2841 42 MSEC2017‐2614 6 MSEC2017‐2708 19 MSEC2017‐2776 31 MSEC2017‐2843 42 MSEC2017‐2615 7 MSEC2017‐2710 19 MSEC2017‐2777 31 MSEC2017‐2847 43 MSEC2017‐2619 7 MSEC2017‐2711 20 MSEC2017‐2778 31 MSEC2017‐2850 43 MSEC2017‐2621 7 MSEC2017‐2712 20 MSEC2017‐2779 32 MSEC2017‐2853 43 MSEC2017‐2624 8 MSEC2017‐2715 20 MSEC2017‐2780 32 MSEC2017‐2854 44 MSEC2017‐2626 8 MSEC2017‐2719 21 MSEC2017‐2781 32 MSEC2017‐2856 44 MSEC2017‐2630 8 MSEC2017‐2720 21 MSEC2017‐2782 33 MSEC2017‐2858 44 MSEC2017‐2638 9 MSEC2017‐2721 21 MSEC2017‐2783 33 MSEC2017‐2860 45 MSEC2017‐2639 9 MSEC2017‐2723 22 MSEC2017‐2786 33 MSEC2017‐2863 45 MSEC2017‐2641 10 MSEC2017‐2725 22 MSEC2017‐2787 34 MSEC2017‐2864 45 MSEC2017‐2643 10 MSEC2017‐2726 22 MSEC2017‐2788 34 MSEC2017‐2871 46 MSEC2017‐2644 10 MSEC2017‐2731 22 MSEC2017‐2789 34 MSEC2017‐2872 46 MSEC2017‐2654 11 MSEC2017‐2733 23 MSEC2017‐2790 35 MSEC2017‐2873 46 MSEC2017‐2656 11 MSEC2017‐2734 23 MSEC2017‐2792 35 MSEC2017‐2874 47 MSEC2017‐2657 12 MSEC2017‐2735 23 MSEC2017‐2794 34 MSEC2017‐2877 47 MSEC2017‐2659 12 MSEC2017‐2736 24 MSEC2017‐2796 36 MSEC2017‐2878 47 MSEC2017‐2665 12 MSEC2017‐2737 24 MSEC2017‐2797 36 MSEC2017‐2879 48 MSEC2017‐2666 13 MSEC2017‐2739
    [Show full text]
  • Precision Injection Molding How to Make Polymer Optics for High Volume and High Precision Applications
    PLASTIC OPTICS Precision Injection Molding How to Make Polymer Optics for High Volume and High Precision Applications Whether it is a cellphone camera • Low material cost THE AUTHOR or a head-up display – polymer optics is Optical polymers are within a range of at the heart of many high tech devices 5…30 €/kg. Compared to optical glass and the market demand for such pre- this makes a notable difference. RALF MAYER • Plain and fast mass production cision optical components is growing Dr.-Ing. Ralf Mayer Injection molded lenses are finished in year by year. The main application fields attended University of one step to optical quality without the are in the automotive industry, in the Kaiserslautern and holds need for additional finishing steps, such medical field (disposable optics), in sen- a degree in mechani- as polishing. Compared to glass, the cycle sor and information technology. Beside cal engineering. In 1997 he received a times are very low which makes injection lightweight and economic advantages, doctor´s degree in the fields of thin film molding suitable for mass production. polymer optics enables completely new coating and sputtering. After that he • High degrees of freedom in the design worked on the development of high solutions in optics. The key to all this is With injection molding almost every speed scales at Wipotec and than joined precision manufacturing. surface shape (e. g. diffractive, freeform, SiemensVDO where he was responsib- nano structure) becomes feasible without le for the optical design of automotive extra costs. Hence this process is well sui- Basic assessment of Precision head-up-displays.
    [Show full text]