Northern Belgium)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Northern Belgium) MINISTERE DES MINISTERIE VAN AFFAIRES ECONOMIQUES ECONOMISCHE ZAKEN ADMINISTRATION DE LA BESTUUR QUALITE ET DE LA SECURITE KWALITEIT EN VEILIGHEID GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF BELGIUM PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1999/1- N.289 BURIAL HISTORY AND COALIFICATION MODELLING OF WESTPHALIAN STRATA IN THE EASTERN CAMPINE BASIN (NORTHERN BELGIUM) by S. Helsen and V. Langenaeker T Q -50001+----r----t----+----+---T------T----1 -350 -300 -250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 Time (myr) MINISTERE DES MINISTERIE VAN AFFAIRES ECONOMIQUES ECONOMISCHEZAKEN ADMINISTRATION DE LA BESTUUR QUALITE ET DE LA SECURITE KW ALITEIT EN VEILIGHEID SERVICE GEOLOGIQUE DE BELGIQUE BELGISCHE GEOLOGISCHE DIENST GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF BELGIUM* PROFESSIONAL PAPER 199911, N. 289 BURIAL HISTORY AND COALIFICATION MODELLING OF WESTPHALIAN STRATA IN THE EASTERN CAMPINE BASIN (NORTHERN BELGIUM) by S. Helsen 1 and V. Langenaeker2 1999 1 Historische Geologie, Instituut voor Aardwetenschappen, Redingenstr. 16, B-3000 Leuven present address: ECOREM, Wayenborgstraat 21, B-2800 Mechelen 2 Geologica n.v., Tervuursesteenweg 200, B-3060 Bertem present address: D.H.V., B-3600 Genk Comite editorial : L. Dejonghe, P. Laga, R. Paepe Redactieraad: L. Dejonghe, P. Laga, R. Paepe Service Geologique de Belgique Belgische Geologische Dienst Rue Jenner, 13 - 1000 Bruxelles Jennerstraat 13, 1000 Brussel * «The Geological Survey of Belgium cannot be held responsible for the accuracy of the contents, the opinions given and the statements made in the articles published in this series~ the responsability resting with the authors >). Toute !'information economique en claire et net sur Aile economische informatie rechtstreeks op http : 1/mineco.fgov.be http : 1/mineco.fgov.be Editeur responsable: Roland PAEPE Verantwoordelijke uitgever: Roland PAEPE rue Jenner 13 Jennerstraat 13 1000 Bruxelles 1000 Brussel Depot legal: D 1999/0880/3 Wettelijk depot: D 1 999/0880/3 Table of contents ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 KEYWORDS ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1. AIM OF THE STUDY .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2. GEOGRAPHIC AND GEOLOGIC SETTING .............................................................................................................................................. 4 3. MODELLING .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 3.1. SOFTWARE ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 3.2. INPUT DATA .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 3.2.1. Stratigraphic data ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 3.2.2. Decompaction data ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 3.2.3. Porosity and thermal conductivity data ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5 3.2.4. Heat flow models ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2.5. Surface temperature model ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 6 4. RESULTS ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 4.1. BURIAL HISTORY ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 4.2. COALIFICATION .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 4.2.1. Carboniferous .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 4.2.1.1. Wells KB69, KB 79, KB8l, KB86 and KBI85 ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 4.2.1.2. Wells KB l 15 and KB !63 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 8 4.2. I .3. Wells K.Bl74, KBI86 and KBLommel (coalification minimum north ofZolder) .............................................................. 8 4.2. I .4. Wells KBI68, KBI72, K20I and KBI98 ...................................................................................................................................................................... 8 4.2.2. Post-Carboniferous ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 8 4.3. HYDROCARBON POTENTIAL......................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 5. CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 10 7. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 TABLES .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 23 2 ABSTRACT One dimensional basin modelling techniques are applied in the eastern Campine Basin in Belgium to reconstruct the burial history and thermal maturation of coal-bearing strata. Separated by two phases of regional uplift and subse­ quent erosion, subsidence occurred during the Carboniferous, the Late Permian through Jurassic and the Late Creta­ ceous to Cenozoic. A model with a first phase of important burial during the Westphalian/Stephanian and a second during the Triassic through Middle Jurassic is proposed. For the western and southern wells it appears that maximum coalification was attained immediately after the first stage of burial. For the other wells, especially for those in the northeastern part of the coalfield, maximum thermal maturation may have evolved from the second phase of heating in the Late Jurassic ahd Early Cretaceous. A best fit between calculated and measured coalification data is obtained by a combination of high heat flows and important packages of Late Carboniferous and Early to Middle Jurassic strata. 2 Heat flows of 102-lll mW/m , assumed for Westphalian and Stephanian times, were succeeded by moderate
Recommended publications
  • Distribution and Ecology of the Stoneflies (Plecoptera) of Flanders
    Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim. 2008, 44 (3), 203 - 213 Distribution and ecology of the stonefl ies (Plecoptera) of Flanders (Belgium) K. Lock, P.L.M. Goethals Ghent University, Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology and Aquatic Ecology, J. Plateaustraat 22, 9000 Gent, Belgium. Based on a literature survey and the identifi cation of all available collection material from Flanders, a checklist is presented, distribution maps are plotted and the relationship between the occurrence of the different species and water characteristics is analysed. Of the sixteen stonefl y species that have been recorded, three are now extinct in Flanders (Isogenus nubecula, Taen- iopteryx nebulosa and T. schoenemundi), while the remaining species are rare. The occurrence of stonefl ies is almost restricted to small brooks, while observations in larger watercourses are almost lacking. Although a few records may indicate that some larger watercourses have recently been recolonised, these observations consisted of single specimens and might be due to drift. Most stonefl y population are strongly isolated and therefore extremely vulnerable. Small brooks in the Campine region (northeast Flanders), which are characterised by a lower pH and a lower conductivity, contained a different stonefl y community than the small brooks in the rest of Flanders. Leuctra pseudosignifera, Nemoura marginata and Protonemura intricata are mainly found in small brooks in the loamy region, Amphinemura standfussi, Isoperla grammatica, Leuctra fusca, L. hippopus, N. avicularis and P. meyeri mainly occur in small Campine brooks, while L. nigra, N. cinerea and Nemurella pictetii can be found in both types. Nemoura dubitans can typically be found in stagnant water fed with freatic water.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Play Analyses for Antwerp & Limburg- Belgium
    State of play analyses for Antwerp & Limburg- Belgium Contents Socio-economic characterization of the region ................................................................ 2 General ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Hydrology .................................................................................................................................. 7 Regulatory and institutional framework ......................................................................... 11 Legal framework ...................................................................................................................... 11 Standards ................................................................................................................................ 12 Identification of key actors .............................................................................................. 13 Existing situation of wastewater treatment and agriculture .......................................... 17 Characterization of wastewater treatment sector ................................................................. 17 Characterization of the agricultural sector: ............................................................................ 20 Existing related initiatives ................................................................................................ 26 Discussion and conclusion remarks ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Viewing Archiving 300
    Mémoires pour servir à l'Explication Toelichtende Verhandelingen des Cartes Géologiques et Minières voorde Geologische en Mijnkaarten de la Belgique van België Mémoire No 21 Verhandeling N° 21 Subsurface structural analysis of the late-Dinantian carbonate shelf at the northern flank of the Brabant Massif (Campine Basin, N-Belgium). by R. DREESEN, J. BOUCKAERT, M. DUSAR, J. SOl LLE & N. VANDENBERGHE MINISTERE DES AFFAIRES ECONOMIQUES MINISTERIE VAN ECONOMISCHE ZAKEN ADMINISTRATION DES MINES BESTUUR VAN HET MIJNWEZEN Service Géologique de Belgique Belgische Geologische Dienst 13, rue Jenner 13,Jennerstr.aat 1040 BRUXELLES 1040 BRUSSEL Mé~. Expl. Cartes Géologiques et Minières de la Belgique 1987 N° 21 37p. 18 fig. Toelicht. Verhand. Geologische en Mijnkaarten van België blz. tabl. SUBSURFACE STRUCTURAL ANAL VSIS OF THE LATE-DINANTIAN CARBONATE SHELF AT THE NORTHERN FLANK OF THE BRABANT MASSIF (CAMPINE BASIN, N-BELGIUM). 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Seismic surveys in the Antwerp Campine area 1.2. Geological - stratigraph ical setting 1.3. Main results 2. THE DINANTIAN CARBONATE SUBCROP 2. 1. Sei smic character 2.2. General trends and anomalies 2.2.1. Western zone 2.2.2. Eastern zone 2.2.3. Transition zone 2.3. Deformations 2.3.1. Growth fault 2.3.2. Collapse structures 2.3.3. T ectonics 2.3.3.1. Graben faults 2.3.3.2. Central belt 2.4. 1nternal and underlying structures 2.4.1. 1nternal structures 2.4.2. Underlying deep reflectors 3. RELATIONSHIP WITH OVERLYING STRATA 3.1. Upper Carboniferous 3.1.1. Namurian 3.1.2. Westphalian 3.2. Mesozoicum 3.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Track Changes Version
    Proposal new articles of association TRACK CHANGES VERSION CAMPINE Public limited liability company At Nijverheidsstraat 2, 2340 Beerse, VAT BE 0403.807.337 RLE Antwerp section Turnhout DRAFT COORDINATED ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OPTING INTO THE NEW BELGIAN CODE ON COMPANIES AND ASSOCIATION SECTION I : Legal Form, Name, Registered Office, PurposeObject , Term Article 1 : Legal form and Name The company has the form of a limited liability company ("naamloze vennootschap") , which appeals or has appealed to the public savings . Its name is “CAMPINE”. Article 2 : Registered office The registered office of the company is located at 2340 Beerse, Nijverheidsstraat 2. However, the board of directors can decide to transfer its registered office to any other city in the country. The board of directors can decide to establish where it deems useful, whether in Belgium or abroad, branches administration offices, subsidiaries, stocks, or agencies. The company's website is www.campine.com. The company’s email address is [email protected]. Article 3 : PurposeObject The purposeobject of the company is to exploit the hereafter-mentioned exploitations and all similar establishments, either by practicing a metal industry or an industry of chemical products, either by adding or establishing industries or branches of industries, and this in order to enhance their productivity or to improve their return or production. In particular, the company will concentrate on the recycling of lead and other metal fabrics. Overall, the company is allowed to execute these industrial, commercial or financial transactions, which are to develop or to favour its industrial or commercial activities. Consequently, the company is allowed to merge with similar Belgian or foreign companies, by inscribing, purchasing of securities, contributing in kind, waiving of rights, leasing or renting or else, taking interests in all existing or future companies relating directly or indirectly with its company purposeobject .
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Day To
    BELGIAN BIKE TOURS - EMAIL: [email protected] - TELEPHONE +31(0)24-3244712 - FAX +31(0)24-3608454 - WWW.DUTCH-BIKETOURS.NL The Flemish Beer route 8 days, € 669 Introduction Belgium is famous worldwide for its many different beers, with a brewing tradition dating back to the Middle Ages. Centuries ago, even children were given a bit of brew to avoid the undependable drinking water. Nowadays over 200 breweries operate here, creating a variety of styles from refreshing white ale to bolder tripels and quadrupels. On this cycling holiday, discover the origin of several of Belgium’s best beers and marvel at the lovely surroundings that produce them! Pedal into woodlands in the Campine, roll past the renowned Achelse Kluis abbey and cross the Dutch border into Noord Brabant. Explore the world playing card capital of Turnhout and go mad in Antwerp trying to see everything on your list. The friendly university town of Leuven lives up to its reputation and your week ends with a fun and quirky highlight: cycling through water! Day to Day Day 1 Arrival Genk Make your way to Genk today, receive a friendly welcome at your hotel and wander through delightful Molenvijver Park before dinner. Day 2 Genk - Heeze 75 km Kick off your tour riding quiet roads to Bocholt, home to Europe’s largest beer brewery museum. Breathe in the aroma and discover the steps leading up to a perfectly poured pint. The nature reserve at Beverbeekse Heide is a world of wetlands, woods and patches of heath. Pause in Achelse Kluis to see the abbey and adjacent brewery, shop, gallery and inn.
    [Show full text]
  • The Campine Plateau 12 Koen Beerten, Roland Dreesen, Jos Janssen and Dany Van Uytven
    The Campine Plateau 12 Koen Beerten, Roland Dreesen, Jos Janssen and Dany Van Uytven Abstract Once occupied by shallow and wide braided channels of the Meuse and Rhine rivers around the Early to Middle Pleistocene transition, transporting and depositing debris from southern origin, the Campine Plateau became a positive relief as the combined result of uplift, the protective role of the sedimentary cover, and presumably also base level fluctuations. The escarpments bordering the Campine Plateau are tectonic or erosional in origin, showing characteristics of both a fault footwall in a graben system, a fluvial terrace, and a pediment. The intensive post-depositional evolution is attested by numerous traces of chemical and physical weathering during (warm) interglacials and glacials respectively. The unique interplay between tectonics, climate, and geomorphological processes led to the preservation of economically valuable natural resources, such as gravel, construction sand, and glass sand. Conversely, their extraction opened new windows onto the geological and geomorphological evolution of the Campine Plateau adding to the geoheritage potential of the first Belgian national park, the National Park Hoge Kempen. In this chapter, the origin and evolution of this particular landscape is explained and illustrated by several remarkable geomorphological highlights. Keywords Campine plateau Á Meuse terraces Á Late Glacial and Holocene dunes Á Tectonic control on fluvial evolution Á Polygonal soils Á Natural resources Á Coal mining 12.1 Introduction (TAW: Tweede Algemene Waterpassing) in the south, to ca. 30 m near the Belgian-Dutch border in the north (Fig. 12.1 The Campine Plateau is an extraordinary morphological b). The polygonal shape of this lowland plateau has attracted feature in northeastern Belgium, extending into the southern a lot of attention from geoscientists during the last 100 years, part of the Netherlands (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Geography of North-Eastern Belgium - the Boom Clay Outcrop and Subcrop Zone
    EXTERNAL REPORT SCK•CEN-ER-202 12/Kbe/P-2 Physical geography of north-eastern Belgium - the Boom Clay outcrop and subcrop zone Koen Beerten and Bertrand Leterme SCK•CEN Contract: CO-90-08-2214-00 NIRAS/ONDRAF contract: CCHO 2009- 0940000 Research Plan Geosynthesis November, 2012 SCK•CEN PAS Boeretang 200 BE-2400 Mol Belgium EXTERNAL REPORT OF THE BELGIAN NUCLEAR RESEARCH CENTRE SCK•CEN-ER-202 12/Kbe/P-2 Physical geography of north-eastern Belgium - the Boom Clay outcrop and subcrop zone Koen Beerten and Bertrand Leterme SCK•CEN Contract: CO-90-08-2214-00 NIRAS/ONDRAF contract: CCHO 2009- 0940000 Research Plan Geosynthesis January, 2012 Status: Unclassified ISSN 1782-2335 SCK•CEN Boeretang 200 BE-2400 Mol Belgium © SCK•CEN Studiecentrum voor Kernenergie Centre d’étude de l’énergie Nucléaire Boeretang 200 BE-2400 Mol Belgium Phone +32 14 33 21 11 Fax +32 14 31 50 21 http://www.sckcen.be Contact: Knowledge Centre [email protected] COPYRIGHT RULES All property rights and copyright are reserved to SCK•CEN. In case of a contractual arrangement with SCK•CEN, the use of this information by a Third Party, or for any purpose other than for which it is intended on the basis of the contract, is not authorized. With respect to any unauthorized use, SCK•CEN makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, and assumes no liability as to the completeness, accuracy or usefulness of the information contained in this document, or that its use may not infringe privately owned rights. SCK•CEN, Studiecentrum voor Kernenergie/Centre d'Etude de l'Energie Nucléaire Stichting van Openbaar Nut – Fondation d'Utilité Publique ‐ Foundation of Public Utility Registered Office: Avenue Herrmann Debroux 40 – BE‐1160 BRUSSEL Operational Office: Boeretang 200 – BE‐2400 MOL 5 Abstract The Boom Clay and Ypresian clays are considered in Belgium as potential host rocks for geological disposal of high-level and/or long-lived radioactive waste.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron and Associated Industries of Lorraine, the Sarre District, Luxemburg, and Belgium
    UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Bulletin 703 THE IRON AND ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES OF LORRAINE, THE SARRE DISTRICT, LUXEMBURG, AND BELGIUM BY ALFRED H. BROOKS AND MORRIS F. LA CROIX WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT P R I N T I N Q O F F I O E 1920 CONTENTS. Page. Preface, by Alfred H. Brooks......................... '.. .................... 9 The past and future use of Lorraine iron ore, by Alfred H. Brooks............. 13 Introduction............................................... ^.......... 13 Lorraine iron deposits.................................................. 16 General features................................................... 16 Reserves........................................................... 18 Geographic relations................................................ 19 Composition of ores................................................. 19 Mining costs....................................................... 20 Coking coal.............................................................. 20 General distribution.......................................:....... 20 . French coal fields.................................................. 20 Westphalian coal field............................................. 24 Coal fields west of the Rhine........................................ 25 Sarre coal field.................................................... 25 Belgian coal fields.................................................. 26 Summary.......................................................... 26 Ownership and value of.metallurgic
    [Show full text]
  • Hoge Kempen’ – Connecterra 23 5.1 General 23 5.2 History 24 5.3 Logo and Brand 24 5.4 Organisation 24 5.5 Heritage 25 5.6 CONNECTERRA 25
    Restoring Mineral Sites for Biodiversity, People and the Economy across North-West Europe topographical map, 1/10 000, MCI 1939 topographical (New) Life after gravel and sand extraction: Restoration for biodiversity and public benefits Examples from the Campine Plateau, Belgium Carole Ampe & Els Ameloot Vlaamse Landmaatschappij 18th June 2015 topographical map, 1/10 000, MGI 1965 topographical Restore_Excursionguide_voorontw.indd 2-3 4/06/2015 11:36:34 Table of content 1 Introduction 3 2 Programme 4 3 General information of the region/on the Campine plateau 6 3.1 Location 6 3.2 Geological background 7 3.3 Minerals 11 3.4 Landscape 14 3.5 Nature 14 4 Bergerven 15 4.1 Introduction 15 4.2 Topography 15 4.3 Geology – geomorphology 16 4.4 Soils 17 4.5 Nature 17 4.6 Land use 18 4.7 Aim of the nature development project: 19 4.8 Realisation of the project (2007-2010) 21 4.9 Management 22 5 National park ‘Hoge Kempen’ – Connecterra 23 5.1 General 23 5.2 History 24 5.3 Logo and brand 24 5.4 Organisation 24 5.5 Heritage 25 5.6 CONNECTERRA 25 6 Mechelse Heide 29 6.1 Extraction history in a nutshell 29 6.2 Flemish nature reserve ‘Hoge Kempen’ 30 6.2.1 Introduction 31 6.2.2 Topography 31 6.2.3 Geology – geomorphology 32 6.2.4 Soil 32 6.2.5 Nature 32 6.2.6 Management 34 Authors: Carole Ampe & Els Ameloot, Vlaamse Landmaatschappij 6.3 Sibelco 35 6.3.1 Introduction 35 6.3.2 Vision 35 RESTORE (www.restorequarries.eu) is a trans-national partnership project working to develop a framework 6.3.3 Important dates for Sibelco at Maasmechelen location 35 for restoring mineral sites to deliver benefits for biodiversity, people and the economy, throughout North- 6.3.4 Extraction 36 West Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraining Quaternary Erosion of the Campine Plateau (NE Belgium
    Earth Surf. Dynam. Discuss., doi:10.5194/esurf-2016-57, 2016 Manuscript under review for journal Earth Surf. Dynam. Published: 1 December 2016 c Author(s) 2016. CC-BY 3.0 License. Constraining Quaternary erosion of the Campine Plateau (NE 10 2 Belgium) using Bayesian inversion of an in-situ produced Be concentration depth profile 4 Koen Beerten1, Eric Laloy1, Veerle Vanacker2, Bart Rogiers1, Laurent Wouters3 1Institute Environment-Health-Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK•CEN), Mol, 2400, Belgium 6 2Georges Lemaitre Centre for Earth and Climate Research, Earth and Life Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348, Belgium 8 3Long-term RD&D department, Belgian National Agency for Radioactive Waste and enriched Fissile Material (ONDRAF/NIRAS), Brussels, 1210, Belgium 10 12 Correspondence to: Koen Beerten ([email protected]) Abstract. The rate at which low-lying sandy areas in temperate regions, such as the Campine area (NE Belgium), have been 14 eroding during the Quaternary is a matter of debate. Current knowledge on the average pace of landscape evolution in the Campine area is largely based on geological inferences and modern analogies. We applied Bayesian inversion to an in-situ 16 produced 10Be concentration depth profile in fluvial sand, sampled on top of the Campine Plateau, and inferred the average long-term erosion rate together with three other parameters, i.e., the surface exposure age, inherited 10Be concentration and 18 sediment bulk density. The inferred erosion rate of 44 ± 9 mm/kyr (1σ) is relatively large in comparison with landforms that erode under comparable (palaeo-)climates elsewhere in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Source-Bordering Aeolian Dune Formation Along the Scheldt River
    Netherlands Journal of Geosciences Source-bordering aeolian dune formation along the Scheldt River (southern www.cambridge.org/njg Netherlands – northern Belgium) was caused by Younger Dryas cooling, high river gradient and southwesterly summer winds Original Article Cite this article: Kasse C, Woolderink HAG, Cornelis Kasse1 , Hessel A.G. Woolderink1, Marjan E. Kloos2 and Wim Z. Hoek3 Kloos ME, and Hoek WZ. Source-bordering aeolian dune formation along the Scheldt River 1 (southern Netherlands – northern Belgium) was Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 2 3 caused by Younger Dryas cooling, high river TBI Infra, Landdrostlaan 49, 7327 GM Apeldoorn, the Netherlands and Department of Physical Geography, gradient and southwesterly summer winds. Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan 4, 3584 CB Utrecht, the Netherlands Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 99, e13. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2020.15 Abstract Received: 3 August 2020 The Younger Dryas cold period caused major changes in vegetation and depositional environ- Revised: 1 October 2020 ments. This study focuses on the aeolian river-connected dunes along the former, Weichselian Accepted: 5 October 2020 Late Glacial, course of the Scheldt River in the southern Netherlands. Aeolian dunes along the Keywords: Scheldt have received little attention, as they are partly covered by Holocene peat and marine adhesion ripple bedding; Allerød – Younger deposits. The spatial distribution of the dunes is reconstructed by digital elevation model Dryas transition; braided system; drowned analysis and coring transects. Dunes are present on the high eastern bank of the Scheldt palaeovalley; parabolic river dunes; pollen and in the subsurface of the polder area west of the Brabantse Wal escarpment.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Country Analyses Belgium
    Soil Country Analyses Belgium Anna Rita Gentile, Sara Barceló-Cordón, Marc Van Liedekerke EUR 23959 EN/2 - 2009 Soil Country Analyses Belgium The mission of the JRC-IES is to provide scientific-technical support to the European Union’s policies for the protection and sustainable development of the European and global environment. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Contact information Address: Joint Research Centre, TP 280, Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra (VA) Italy E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +39 0332 785179 Fax: +39 0332 786394 http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ Legal Notice Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server http://europa.eu/ JRC 53315 EUR 23959 EN/2 ISBN 978-92-79-12980-3 ISSN 1018-5593 DOI 10.2788/27334 Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities © European Communities, 2009 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged Printed in Italy TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction................................................................................................................................1 Organization of the report.......................................................................................................... 3 Authors and contributors ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]