DOCSLIB.ORG

Situation Analysis of Children with Disabilities in Myanmar 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Situation Analysis of Children with Disabilities in Myanmar 2016 SITUATION ANALYSIS of CHILDREN with DISABILITIES in Myanmar 2016 Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors and do not necessarily reflect the policies or views of UNICEF or the Department of Social Welfare. Extracts from this publication may be freely reproduced with due acknowledgement, using the following reference: UNICEF 2016. Situation Analysis of Children with Disabilities in the Republic of the Union of Myanmar. Yangon, UNICEF Myanmar. For further information and to download this or any other publication, please visit the UNICEF Myanmar website at http://www.unicef.org/myanmar/ Contact: UNICEF MYANMAR 23-A, Inya Myaing Road Shwe Daung Gya Ward 2, Bahan Township, Myanmar [email protected] Copyright: ©2016 United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) Illustration: Khine Zar Mon Design and Layout: Yar Zar Ye Ni Photos: @UNICEF Myanmar/2016/Kaung Htet This report has been prepared by IPE Global Limited for the Myanmar Country Office of the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and the Department of Social Welfare, Ministry of Social Welfare, Relief and Resettlement. IPE Global has performed this study in concert with Myanmar Survey Research Limited (MSR), which has been tasked with the collection of quantitative and qualitative data. All information in this report is of a confidential nature and intended for the exclusive use of UNICEF, which may transmit such information to its employees or professional advisors, and to the government of Myanmar, at its discretion. The data described, their analysis, and associated findings and recommendations are not representative of the whole of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar and should be interpreted with caution. Acknowledgements The study team would like to thank the children and people of Myanmar for their dedicated and spontaneous participation in the data collection process, including through response to survey questions, participation in focus group discussions (FGDs) and key informant interviews, and overall hospitality to the enumerators. Special thanks are due to the staff of the Department of Social Welfare for their support, guidance and involvement in the supervision of the data collection process. The team also would like to thank staff from the Ministries of Education and Health, representatives from various disabled people’s organizations, and other national and international non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that have contributed to the finaliza- tion of this study. Lastly, the team would like to express its appreciation to the staff of UNICEF Myanmar for their support and enthusiasm throughout the process. This report is dedicated to all the children in Myanmar. Study Team Paula Frederica Hunt Team leader Pinaki Joddar Quantitative expert San Tun Aung Qualitative expert Sanjay Tripathi Situation analysis and quality assurance expert CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................... 1 Methodology ...................................................................................... 1 Key Findings ...................................................................................... 1 Recommendations ...................................................................................... 6 SECTION I: Context ...................................................................................... 9 1. Context of the situation analysis ...................................................................................... 9 1.1 Country information ...................................................................................... 9 1.2 Laws and policies ...................................................................................... 10 1.3 Defining disability ...................................................................................... 13 SECTION II: Methods and tools ...................................................................................... 15 2. Objectives, design, methodology and limitations ............................................... 15 2.1 Objectives of the situation analysis ......................................................................... 15 2.2 Design of the situation analysis ......................................................................... 16 2.3 Methodology and activities under the situation analysis .................................. 17 2.4 Constraints ...................................................................................... 18 SECTION III: Findings ...................................................................................... 19 3. General information: Children with disabilities ............................................................ 19 3.1 How do stakeholders define disability? ............................................................ 20 4. Daily life of the child ...................................................................................... 23 5. Caregiving and living environment ......................................................................... 27 6. Community and social life ...................................................................................... 29 7. Right to education ...................................................................................... 33 7.1 The education system ...................................................................................... 33 7.2 Children with disabilities in the education system ............................................... 34 7.3 Current challenges ...................................................................................... 35 7.4 Education officials’ perspectives ......................................................................... 36 7.5 Principals’ and teachers’ perspectives ............................................................ 38 7.6 Parents’ perspectives ...................................................................................... 39 7.7 Community members’ perspectives ......................................................................... 40 7.8 NGOs’ perspectives ...................................................................................... 40 8. Right to health ...................................................................................... 43 8.1 Background ...................................................................................... 43 8.2 Current challenges ...................................................................................... 44 8.3 Health care professionals’ perspectives ............................................................ 45 8.4 Parents’ perspectives ...................................................................................... 46 8.5 Community members’ perspectives ......................................................................... 47 8.6 NGOs’ perspectives ...................................................................................... 47 9. Right to a protective environment ......................................................................... 49 9.1 Parents’ perspectives ...................................................................................... 49 9.2 DSW officials’ perspectives ...................................................................................... 50 9.3 Community members’ perspectives ......................................................................... 50 10 Other issues of rights and aspirations ............................................................ 51 10.1 Right to registration and the preservation of identity ............................................... 51 10.2 Right to privacy ...................................................................................... 52 10.3 Children’s aspirations ...................................................................................... 52 11 Prevalence of disability in Mon State: A case study ............................................... 53 11.1 Seeing ...................................................................................... 54 11.2 Hearing ...................................................................................... 55 11.3 Walking ...................................................................................... 55 11.4 Self-Care ...................................................................................... 55 11.5 Communication ...................................................................................... 56 11.6 Learning ...................................................................................... 56 11.7 Emotions ...................................................................................... 57 11.8 A new way to look at the prevalence of disability ............................................... 58 SECTION IV: Overall barriers and bottlenecks children with disabilities face ...................... 61 12 Stakeholder recommendations ...................................................................................... 73 12.1 Recommendations for Parliament ......................................................................... 73 12.2 Recommendations for the government of Myanmar (all ministries and government agencies) ...................................................................................... 74 12.3 Recommendations for the National Committee for Disability (and the DSW as its coordinating body) ...................................................................................... 75 12.4 Recommendations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Myanmar Receives 30,000 Remdesivir Drugs Used in COVID-19 Treatment from NSIC
    DON’T BE TOO FEARFUL BUT TAKE CARE OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC PAGE-8 (OPINION) NATIONAL NATIONAL MoC facilitates import of COVID-19 MoHS Union Minister discusses COVID-19-related devices to be delivered without delay on matters with Yangon Region Administration public holidays Council members, regions/states health officials PAGE-3 PAGE-4 Vol. VIII, No. 93, 13th Waxing of Waso 1383 ME www.gnlm.com.mm Wednesday, 21 July 2021 Five-Point Road Map of the State Administration Council 1. The Union Election Commission will be reconstituted and its mandated tasks, including the scrutiny of voter lists, shall be implemented in accordance with the law. 2. Effective measures will be taken with added momentum to prevent and manage the COVID-19 pandemic. 3. Actions will be taken to ensure the speedy recovery of businesses from the impact of COVID-19. 4. Emphasis will be placed on achieving enduring peace for the entire nation in line with the agreements set out in the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement. 5. Upon accomplishing the provisions of the state of emergency, free and fair multiparty democratic elections will be held in line with the 2008 Constitution, and further work will be undertaken to hand over State duties to the winning party in accordance with democratic standards. Myanmar receives 30,000 Remdesivir drugs used in COVID-19 treatment from NSIC A TATMADAW aircraft landed at Nay Pyi Taw Airport, carry- ing 30,000 Remdesivir drugs donated by the National Stra- tegic Investment Corporation Co. Ltd (NSIC) to the State Administration Council from Hyderabad, India, yesterday evening.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparatory Survey on Two-Step Loan Project for Agriculture and Rural Development in the Republic of Union Myanmar Fina L Report
    Preparatory Survey on Two-Step Loan Project for Agriculture and Rural Development in the Republic of Union Myanmar Fina The Republic of the Union of Myanmar Preparatory Survey on Two-Step Loan Project for Agriculture and Rural Development in the Republic of the Union of Myanmar Final Report l Report February 2014 February 2014 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Daiwa Institute of Research Ltd. 1R Sanyu Consultants Inc. CR（5） 14-012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Agriculture in Myanmar The Government of Myanmar is at this moment facing critical decisions that will determine the future direction of agriculture. Myanmar’s agricultural potential is enormous, given the country’s resource endowments as well as its favorable geographic location in the Greater Mekong Subregion, which places Myanmar advantageously between two huge markets, India and China. Good access to the buoyant market of Gulf countries is an additional feature. Despite these advantages, however, Myanmar’s agriculture has underperformed over a long period of time. Today, two-thirds of the population of Myanmar is primarily engaged in agriculture but about one quarter of the population still falls below the national poverty line. What are the major reasons for the poor performance of Myanmar’s agriculture? Most recent research points out issues with skewed land distribution, poor water control systems, expensive transportation, weak rural and agricultural financing, unpredictable government policies, low public investment in agriculture and weak extension service to farmers.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview: Myanmar Joint Peacebuilding Needs Assessment
    ! #)$#)-)$)$#$#%#))+),#)$+'#"#)$)%*!$)#$#$ .#"' # #$#3()) '" '$*%(/ ) (()$# $ $#!) # "* $ ) $*#)'. $'( # $%%$')*#). $' ) '$+'. # +!$%"#) $ $#!)3)$""*#)(1$*!(' *#'()##$)()*)$##$#!)3)$""*#)("$#'$'#$() $!'( 4$+'#"#)/ #$#3()) '" '$*%(/ $#$'(/ ( # (5/ #!*# #).# #( # %'$')(/)$+'#"#)# #*'.8679'&*()(*%%$')'$")$#$'*%%$')'$*%7$' $#)#((((("#)1 ("!! )( $'8! . ) .#"' #)' 4 5 ,( ()!( # '*'. 8679 )$ +!$%)'",$' $'(*$#)#((((("#)1$!!$,##)!(*(($#(/))( $' ')$%*'(*),$3$!%%'$0 • ##)!&* ()$ ) $-()##$'")$#/)$$"%!).%'!/)$#).-()# ) '$" '# $ ($*'(/ #!*# '( $ #$#(()#) $' $#)')$'. )/ # ) %(1 •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isclaimer The present report represents an effort to reflect the current understanding of the situation and needs in conflict-affected areas by an ad-hoc group assembled by the
    [Show full text]
  • MYSAP Communication Approaches for Sustainable Aquaculture Development and Improved Human Nutrition in the Sagaing Region and the Shan State of Myanmar
    Communication approaches of MYSAP MYSAP Communication Approaches for Sustainable Aquaculture Development and Improved Human Nutrition in the Sagaing Region and the Shan State of Myanmar MYSAP Communication Approaches for Sustainable Aquaculture Development and Improved Human Nutrition in the Sagaing Region and the Shan State of Myanmar Khaing Kyaw Htoo Inland component of MYSAP, Field Manager WorldFish Don Griffiths Inland component of MYSAP, Team Leader WorldFish Hsu Myat Nway Inland component of MYSAP, Monitoring and Evaluation Coordinator WorldFish Nang Tin May Win Inland component of MYSAP, Information, Education and Communication Coordinator WorldFish MYSAP Communication Approaches About MYSAP The Multiannual Indicative Programme (2014-2020) identified that approximately one third of children in Myanmar suffered chronic undernutrition (stunting), the nationwide prevalence of moderately underweight children was 32% and the mean proportion of total household expenditure on food was 68%. Fish provided more than 70% of animal protein, with mean consumption levels estimated to be from 20 to over 40 kg per person per year. However, compared to other neighbouring countries aquaculture only provided a small proportion of the total fish consumed because of localized production, relatively high prices, difficult logistics and high post-harvest handling losses. Seasonality, poor infrastructure (transport and electricity) and lack of post-harvest technology, meant that a large part of fish consumed was either dried or in the form of fish pastes,
    [Show full text]
  • CRC Shadow Report Burma the Plight of Children Under Military Rule in Burma
    CRC Shadow Report Burma The plight of children under military rule in Burma Child Rights Forum of Burma 29th April 2011 Assistance for All Political Prisoners-Burma (AAPP-B), Burma Issues ( BI), Back Pack Health Worker Team(BPHWT) and Emergency Action Team (EAT), Burma Anti-Child Trafficking (Burma-ACT), Burmese Migrant Workers Education Committee (BMWEC), Chin Human Rights Organization (CHRO), Committee For Protection and Promote of Child Rights-Burma (CPPCR-Burma), Foundation for Education and Development (FED)/Grassroots Human Rights Education (GHRE), Human Rights Education Institute of Burma (HREIB), Karen Human Rights Group (KHRG), Karen Youth Organization (KYO), Kachin Women’s Association Thailand (KWAT), Mae Tao Clinic (MTC), Oversea Mon Women’s Organization (OMWO), Social Action for Women (SAW),Women and Child Rights Project (WCRP) and Human Rights Foundation of Monland (HURFOM),Yoma 3 News Service (Burma) TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 3 Acknowledgement 3 Introduction 3 Purpose and Methodology of the Report 4 Articles 24 and 27 ‐ the right to health and an adequate standard of living 6 Access to Health Services 7 Child Malnutrition 8 Maternal health 9 Denial of the right to health for children in prisons 10 Article 28 – Right to education 13 Inadequate teacher salaries 14 Armed conflict and education 15 Education for girls 16 Discrimination in education 16 Human Rights Education 17 Article 32–Child Labour 19 Forced Labour 20 Portering for the Tatmadaw 21 Article 34 and 35 ‐ Trafficking in Children 23 Corruption and restrictions
    [Show full text]
  • From Kunming to Mandalay: the New “Burma Road”
    AsieAsie VVisionsisions 2525 From Kunming to Mandalay: The New “Burma Road” Developments along the Sino-Myanmar border since 1988 Hélène Le Bail Abel Tournier March 2010 Centre Asie Ifri The Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental and a non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Using an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the rare French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European debate. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the authors alone. ISBN : 978-2-86592-675-6 © All rights reserved, Ifri, 2010 IFRI IFRI-BRUXELLES 27 RUE DE LA PROCESSION RUE MARIE-THÉRÈSE, 21 75740 PARIS CEDEX 15 - FRANCE 1000 - BRUXELLES, BELGIQUE PH. : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 PH. : +32 (2) 238 51 10 FAX: +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 FAX: +32 (2) 238 51 15 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] WEBSITE: Ifri.org China Program, Centre Asie/Ifri The Ifri China Program’s objectives are: . To organize regular exchanges with Chinese elites and enhance mutual trust through the organization of 4 annual seminars in Paris or Brussels around Chinese participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Map
    Myanmar Information Management Unit Myanmar Administrative Map 94°E 96°E 98°E 100°E India China Bhutan Bangladesh Along India Vietnam KACHIN Myanmar Dong Laos South China Sea Bay of Bengal / Passighat China Thailand Daporija Masheng SAGAING 28°N Andaman Sea Philippines Tezu 28°N Cambodia Sea of the Philippine Gulf of Thailand Bangladesh Pannandin !( Gongshan CHIN NAWNGMUN Sulu Sea Namsai Township SHAN MANDALAY Brunei Malaysia Nawngmun MAGWAY Laos Tinsukia !( Dibrugarh NAY PYI TAW India Ocean RAKHINE Singapore Digboi Lamadi KAYAH o Taipi Duidam (! !( Machanbaw BAGO Margherita Puta-O !( Bomdi La !( PaPannssaauunngg North Lakhimpur KHAUNGLANHPU Weixi Bay of Bengal Township Itanagar PUTA-O MACHANBAW Indonesia Township Township Thailand YAN GON KAY IN r Khaunglanhpu e !( AYE YARWADY MON v Khonsa i Nanyun R Timor Sea (! Gulf of Sibsagar a Martaban k Fugong H i l NANYUN a Township Don Hee M !( Jorhat Mon Andaman Sea !(Shin Bway Yang r Tezpur e TANAI v i TANINTHARYI NNaaggaa Township R Sumprabum !( a Golaghat k SSeellff--AAddmmiinniisstteerreedd ZZoonnee SUMPRABUM Township i H Gulf of a m Thailand Myanmar administrative Structure N Bejiang Mangaldai TSAWLAW LAHE !( Tanai Township Union Territory (1) Nawgong(nagaon) Township (! Lahe State (7) Mokokchung Tuensang Lanping Region (7) KACHIN INDIA !(Tsawlaw Zunheboto Hkamti INJANGYANG Hojai Htan Par Kway (! Township !( 26°N o(! 26°N Dimapur !( Chipwi CHIPWI Liuku r Township e Injangyang iv !( R HKAMTI in w Township d HPAKANT MYITKYINA Lumding n i Township Township Kohima Mehuri Ch Pang War !(Hpakant
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Urban Diagnostic Report
    THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR RAPID URBAN DIAGNOSTIC REPORT Prepared for Department of Urban and Housing Development, Ministry of Construction With technical assistance from UN Habitat RAPID URBAN DIAGNOSTIC REPORT MYANMAR TABLE OF CONTENTS A. CONTEXT AND BACKGROUND OF RAPID URBAN DIAGNOSTIC REPORT MYANMAR P. 4 A.I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY P. 4 A.II GENERAL BACKGROUND P. 5 A.III BACKGROUND OF RAPID URBAN DIAGNOSTIC P. 5 A.IV PURPOSE OF RAPID URBAN DIAGNOSTIC REPORT MYANMAR P. 6 B. RAPID URBAN DIAGNOSTIC REPORT MYANMAR P. 7 B.I URBANIZATION P. 7 B.I.1 CURRENT LEVEL OF URBANIZATION P. 7 B.I.2 URBANIZATION IN MYANMAR IN REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE P. 9 B.I.3 DRIVERS AND TRENDS OF URBANIZATION P. 11 B.I.3.1 DRIVERS OF URBANIZATION P. 11 B.I.3.2 PROJECTION OF URBANIZATION P. 12 B.I.3.3 SPATIAL DIMENSION OF URBANIZATION IN MYANMAR P. 13 B.II MYANMAR’S SYSTEM OF URBAN CENTERS AND GROWTH CORRIDORS P. 14 B.III URBAN GOVERNANCE IN TOWNSHIPS/SECONDARY CITIES P. 19 B.III.1 CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK P. 19 B.III.2 ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION AT THE TOWNSHIP LEVEL P. 20 B.III.2.1 THE TOWNSHIP ADMINISTRATOR AS CENTRAL ACTOR AT TOWNSHIP LEVEL P. 20 B.III.2.2 THE TOWNSHIP COMMITTEES P. 20 B.III.2.3 A SPECIAL CASE: THE TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE AND THE DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS (DEVELOPMENT AFFAIRS ORGANIZATION) P. 22 B.III.2.3.1 ORIGINS OF DMA P. 22 B.III.2.3.2 DMA’S FISCAL POSITION P.
    [Show full text]
  • National Tuberculosis Programme Myanmar Annual Report 2016 June
    National Tuberculosis Program Annual Report 2016 NATIONAL TUBERCULOSIS PROGRAMME MYANMAR ANNUAL REPORT 2016 JUNE 2018 National Tuberculosis Program Annual Report 2016 National Tuberculosis Program Annual Report 2016 CONTENTS Page List of Abbreviations 1 Introduction 1 2 Objectives of NTP 2 3 Human resource of NTP in Myanmar 4 4 Progress of end TB strategy 5 5 External Technical Support 77 6 BCG Immunization 84 7 Budget and External Technical Support 85 8 Progress Towards NTP Goals in 2016 87 9 Evaluation of Regional and State level TB control achievement 96 10 Possble actions to be taken for solving the problems 122 11 Recommendations 124 12 Conclusions 125 13 Annexs 126 National Tuberculosis Program Annual Report 2016 National Tuberculosis Program Annual Report 2016 Abbreviations ACSM Advocacy, Communication and Social Mobilization AD Assistant Director AFB Acid-Fast Bacilli AIDS Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome ARTI Annual Risk of Tuberculosis Infection BCG Bacille Calmette Guerin BHS Basic Health Staff CBTC Community Basd TB Care CNR Case Notification Rate DD Deputy Director DOH Department of Health DOT Directly Observed Treatment DOTS Directly Observed Treatment Short Course DST Drug Sensitivity Testing ELISA Enzyme-Linked Immuno-Solvent Assay EPI Expanded Programmen fo Immunization ETB Ethambutol EQA External Quality Assessment FDC Fixed-dose combination FLD First Line Anti-TB drugs FHI 360 Family Health Internaitonal 360 FM Fluorescence Microscope GF Global Fund GLC Green Light Committee GPs General Practitioners HIV Human Immunodeficiency
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar Child-Centred Risk Assessment
    MYANMAR CHILD-CENTRED RISK ASSESSMENT ©UNICEF Myanmar/2013/Kyaw Kyaw Winn Second Edition 2017 Table of Contents FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................................. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................... 4 ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................. 5 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT ................................................................................................................... 6 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Disaster Risk Reduction ....................................................................................................................... 8 The Case for Putting Children at the Centre of the Risk Equation ...................................................... 8 UNICEF and DRR in Myanmar 2017 .................................................................................................... 9 Disaster Risk in Myanmar .................................................................................................................... 9 CHILD-CENTRED RISK ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................................... 10 Advancements in the Second
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Local Governance: Trends in Myanmar a Synthesis of People’S Perspectives Across All States and Regions Photo Credits
    Local Governance Mapping The State of Local Governance: Trends in Myanmar A Synthesis of people’s perspectives across all States and Regions Photo credits Emilie Röell Myanmar Survey Research The views expressed in this publication are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of UNDP. Local Governance Mapping The STaTe of LocaL Governance: TrendS in MyanMar a Synthesis of people’s perspectives across all States and regions UNDP MYANMAR Table of contents Acknowledgements II Acronyms III Executive Summary 1-3 1. Introduction 4 - 7 2. Demographic overview of CRC respondents and security context 8 - 17 2.1 Key demographic indicators and profile of respondents 9 2.2 Safety and security context 15 3. People’s perspectives: key findings 18 - 70 3.1 Recent developments 19 3.1.1 Recent overall developments in the States and Regions 20 3.1.2 Recent developments: access to services 30 3.1.2.1 People’s perceptions on education 30 3.1.2.2 People’s perceptions on basic health provision 34 3.1.2.3 People’s perceptions on quality of water supply 40 3.2 Development planning and participation 43 3.2.1 Indirect citizen participation 45 3.2.2 Direct citizen participation 50 3.3 Information, transparency and accountability 57 3.3.1 Information 57 3.3.2 Te role of the W/VTAs 61 3.3.3 Grievance redressal 65 4. Concluding remarks 68 - 69 A Synthesis of people’s perspectives across all States and Regions - UNDP Myanmar 2015 I acknowledgements UNDP would like to express its sincere thanks to the Ministry of Home Afairs and the General administration Department (GAD) for their unrestricted support and cooperation during the Local Governance mapping, which required extensive information gathering and interviews not only with citizen but also with staf members fom various departments.
    [Show full text]
  • Maternal and Child Health Independent Evaluation Services of the 3MDG Fund: Myanmar
    Independent Evaluation Services of the 3MDG Fund: Myanmar, July 2015 Desk review samples studies Maternal and Child Health Assessment of performance and acceptability of AMWs in rural communities as a strategy to improve maternal health Component addressed The performance and acceptability of AMWs to improve safe delivery practices and MNCH care Year published 2004-05 (unpublished) Year of data in report July-December 2005 Author and/or publisher DOH (WCHD project)/UNICEF Geographical location of research Kawhmu and Kyauktaw townships Population AMWs Sample size 211 Multistage sampling method was used to define the RHCs. The clusters were proportional to the size of urban and Data collection methods rural population; Household questionnaire, women questionnaire and under five questionnaire were used. Location of research document DOH (WCHD unit); Hard copy available with IEG team Report in English/Burmese English Relevant 3MDG indicators target to AMW training only, not the performance Accessible Only full report is accessible and impossible to access data Credible SAQ, observation checklist, FGDs, KIIs, IDIs are conducted and data was cleaned and checked for errors Additional comments It is a useful study for the quality of care and needs to conduct the updated situation in the rural setting Nationwide cause specific maternal mortality survey 2004-05 Component addressed The level and cause of maternal mortality, at the national as well as sub-national levels Year published 2005 Year of data in report 2004-2005 Author and/or publisher
    [Show full text]