DOCSLIB.ORG

Exotics: Heavy Pentaquarks and Tetraquarks Arxiv:1706.00610V2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exotics: Heavy Pentaquarks and Tetraquarks Arxiv:1706.00610V2 DESY 17-071 Exotics: Heavy Pentaquarks and Tetraquarks Ahmed Ali,1 Jens S¨orenLange,2 and Sheldon Stone3 1DESY Theory Group, Notkestrasse 85, D-22607 Hamburg, Germany 2Justus-Liebig-Universit¨atGiessen, II. Physikalisches Institut, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 16, D-35392 Giessen, Germany 3Physics Department, 201 Physics Building, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-1130, USA July 31, 2017 Abstract For many decades after the invention of the quark model in 1964 there was no evidence that hadrons are formed from anything other than the simplest pairings of quarks and antiquarks, mesons being formed of a quark-antiquark pair and baryons from three quarks. In the last decade, however, in an explosion of data from both e+e− and hadron colliders, there are many recently observed states that do not fit into this picture. These new particles are called generically \ex- otics". They can be either mesons or baryons. Remarkably, they all decay into at least one meson formed of either a cc or bb pair. In this review, after the introduction, we explore each of these new discoveries in detail first from an experimental point of view, then subsequently give a theo- retical discussion. These exotics can be explained if the new mesons contain two-quarks and two- antiquarks (tetraquarks), while the baryons contain four-quarks plus an antiquark (pentaquarks). The theoretical explanations for these states take three divergent tracks: tightly bound objects, just as in the case of normal hadrons, but with more constituents, or loosely bound \molecules" similar to the deuteron, but formed from two mesons, or a meson or baryon, or more wistfully, they are not multiquark states but appear due to kinematic effects caused by different rescatterings of virtual particles; most of these models have all been post-dictions. Both the tightly and loosely bound models predict the masses and related quantum numbers of new, as yet undiscovered states. arXiv:1706.00610v2 [hep-ph] 27 Jul 2017 Thus, future experimental discoveries are needed along with theoretical advances to elucidate the structure of these new exotic states. Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Theoretical techniques for quarkonia and exotic hadrons spectroscopy 6 2.1 Quarkonium potentials . .6 2.2 Lattice simulations . .7 2.3 Born-Oppenheimer tetraquarks . .9 2.4 Doubly heavy tetraquarks on the lattice . 10 1 3 Experimental evidence for pentaquarks 11 3.1 History . 11 3.2 The LHCb observation of pentaquark charmonium states . 12 0 − 3.2.1 The Λb ! J= K p decay . 12 0 ∗ 3.2.2 The Λb ! J= Λ decay amplitude . 14 0 ∗ 3.2.3 Fits of the reaction Λb ! J= Λ to the data . 16 0 + − 3.2.4 The matrix element for Λb ! J= Pc K decay . 16 0 − + 3.2.5 Amplitude fits of Λb ! J= K p allowing Pc states . 17 0 − 3.3 Consistency check using Λb ! J= pπ decays . 20 + ∗ 3.4 Independent confirmation of the Pc(4450) using a model independent Λ description 26 3.5 Impending studies using photoproduction of J= p resonances . 30 4 Experimental evidence for tetraquarks 31 4.1 The X(3872) state . 31 4.1.1 Mass of the X(3872) . 31 4.1.2 Width of the X(3872) . 32 4.1.3 Decays of the X(3872) . 33 4.1.4 Production of the X(3872) . 36 4.1.5 Interpretation of the X(3872) . 39 4.2 The X(3940) state . 42 4.3 Y states . 44 4.4 Z states of type I in the charmonium mass regime . 49 4.5 Z states of type II in the charmonium mass regime . 53 4.6 Z states in the bottomonium mass regime . 57 4.7 Another curious system: J= φ resonances . 59 5 Theoretical models for tetraquarks 65 5.1 Tetraquarks as cusps . 65 5.2 Tetraquarks as hadroquarkonia . 66 5.3 Tetraquarks as hybrids . 67 5.4 Tetraquarks as hadron molecules . 67 5.5 Tetraquarks as compact diquark-antidiquark mesons . 68 5.6 The diquark model . 69 5.7 Non-relativistic Hamiltonian for tetraquarks with hidden charm . 70 5.8 Low-lying S and P -wave tetraquark states in the cc¯ and b¯b sectors . 71 5.9 Heavy-Quark-Spin Flip in Υ(10860) ! hb(1P; 2P )ππ ................. 76 5.10 Drell-Yan mechanism for vector exotica production at the LHC and Tevatron . 79 6 Theoretical models for pentaquarks 80 6.1 Pentaquarks as rescattering-induced kinematic effects . 81 6.2 Pentaquarks as meson-baryon molecules . 82 6.3 Pentaquarks in the compact diquark models . 83 6.4 SU(3)F structure of pentaquarks . 84 6.5 An effective Hamiltonian for the hidden charm pentaquarks . 85 6.6 b-baryon decays to pentaquarks and heavy quark symmetry . 87 6.7 Weak decays with P in decuplet representation . 88 7 Summary 90 2 1 Introduction When the two B factory experiments BABAR and Belle were proposed, well over a quarter century ago, their main goal was to measure the matter-antimatter asymmetry in the B-meson sector.1 This goal they indeed accomplished very well, together with other related key measurements in flavor physics, which greatly helped in testing the charged current weak interactions in the standard model [1]. While in depth studies of hadronic structure was not on the agenda of these experiments, they also succeeded in uncovering a new facet of QCD. The discovery of the exotic hadron X(3872) in 2003 in the decays B0 ! J= π+π−K by Belle [2] came as a complete surprise.2 Confirmation soon thereafter by BABAR [3, 4], CDF II [5{7], D0 [8], and later by the LHCb [9] and CMS [10], established the X(3872) as a genuine resonance, as opposed to a threshold effect (called a \cusp"). Its discovery turned out to be the harbinger of a new direction in hadron physics. Thus, out of the debris of B-meson decays emerged a second layer of strongly interacting particles called tetraquarks (four-quark states), all containing a cc quark pair. Likewise, in the decays of the Λb-baryon, LHCb later established the existence of two + + pentaquark states Pc (4380) and Pc (4450) in the J= p decay mode [11]. As the minimum valence quark content of such a state is ccuud¯ , the newly discovered baryons have five quarks. Meanwhile, well over two dozen exotic hadrons have found entries in the Particle Data Group [12]. Tentatively called PC X, Y , Z and Pc, they have various J quantum numbers, and come both as charged and neutrals, as discussed in detail in this review and elsewhere [13{16]. At least two b¯b counterparts of the cc¯ states, + + ¯ ¯ Zb (10610) and Zb (10650), have also been reported by Belle [17]. Their valence quark content is bbud. A closely related question is whether tetraquarks and pentaquarks also come with a single charm or bottom valence quark, was reviewed recently [18]. Quarkonium physics is a well-studied system theoretically, having its roots in the non-relativistic quarkonium potential [19, 20]. Its present formulation is in the context of effective field theories based on QCD [21, 22] and lattice-QCD [23{26]. The progress in lattice-based techniques is impressive and allows us to connect the observed hadronic properties with the fundamental parameters in QCD. In particular, hadron spectra below the strong decay thresholds are calculated accurately, and extensive results for multiplets are available. However, so far there are no reliable lattice results for flavor exotic states, though possible cc¯du¯ candidates with J PC = 1+− have been searched for in the vicinity of the ¯ ∗ + DD threshold [27], where the Zc (3900) is found experimentally. No ccs¯ s¯ resonance has been found in the J= φ scattering on the lattice, though their experimental evidence has mounted, and no ccd¯u¯ bound state is found in the DD∗ scattering either [28]. We briefly review the current lattice simulations in section 2, but we shall be mostly using the available phenomenological approaches for the theoretical discussion of tetraquarks and pentaquarks in this review. For the spectra of the cc¯ and b¯b bound states below their corresponding open flavor thresholds, DD¯ and BB¯, potential models are reliable, as they successfully reproduce the observed 1S, 2S, and 1P states, in the cc¯ -, and many more higher states in the b¯b-sector. The most popular of these, the Cornell potential [19, 20], incorporates a color Coulomb term at short distances and a linear confining term at large distances, with the spin-dependent interquark interaction responsible for the splitting of the states in these multiplets governed by a one-gluon exchange Breit-Fermi Hamiltonian. The quarkonium- potential-based studies were substantially extended to cover the cc¯ and b¯b states above the open flavor thresholds (see, for example, Ref. [29]). The concordance between experiments and such theoretical estimates is remarkable in both the charm and bottom sectors, predicting correctly a large number of observed states. While empirical, these potential-model based studies provide useful benchmarks for the quarkonia states, as they provide the background upon which exotic particles are to be searched for and characterized. What are the criteria for an observed hadron to be termed as exotic? The clues to novel features 1They followed the exploratory work done by the ARGUS and CLEO experiments operating in the Υ resonance region. 2Mention of a specific decay mode implies use of the charge-conjugate mode as well. 3 in QCD may come in a number of ways which we discuss here briefly. For example, the exotic hadrons may have unconventional J PC quantum numbers, such as having J PC = 0−−; 0+−; 1+−, which are not allowed for non-relativistic qq¯ states.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Five Common Particles
    The Five Common Particles The world around you consists of only three particles: protons, neutrons, and electrons. Protons and neutrons form the nuclei of atoms, and electrons glue everything together and create chemicals and materials. Along with the photon and the neutrino, these particles are essentially the only ones that exist in our solar system, because all the other subatomic particles have half-lives of typically 10-9 second or less, and vanish almost the instant they are created by nuclear reactions in the Sun, etc. Particles interact via the four fundamental forces of nature. Some basic properties of these forces are summarized below. (Other aspects of the fundamental forces are also discussed in the Summary of Particle Physics document on this web site.) Force Range Common Particles It Affects Conserved Quantity gravity infinite neutron, proton, electron, neutrino, photon mass-energy electromagnetic infinite proton, electron, photon charge -14 strong nuclear force ≈ 10 m neutron, proton baryon number -15 weak nuclear force ≈ 10 m neutron, proton, electron, neutrino lepton number Every particle in nature has specific values of all four of the conserved quantities associated with each force. The values for the five common particles are: Particle Rest Mass1 Charge2 Baryon # Lepton # proton 938.3 MeV/c2 +1 e +1 0 neutron 939.6 MeV/c2 0 +1 0 electron 0.511 MeV/c2 -1 e 0 +1 neutrino ≈ 1 eV/c2 0 0 +1 photon 0 eV/c2 0 0 0 1) MeV = mega-electron-volt = 106 eV. It is customary in particle physics to measure the mass of a particle in terms of how much energy it would represent if it were converted via E = mc2.
    [Show full text]
  • Quasiparticle Anisotropic Hydrodynamics in Ultra-Relativistic
    QUASIPARTICLE ANISOTROPIC HYDRODYNAMICS IN ULTRA-RELATIVISTIC HEAVY-ION COLLISIONS A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Mubarak Alqahtani December, 2017 c Copyright All rights reserved Except for previously published materials Dissertation written by Mubarak Alqahtani BE, University of Dammam, SA, 2006 MA, Kent State University, 2014 PhD, Kent State University, 2014-2017 Approved by , Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Michael Strickland , Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Declan Keane Dr. Spyridon Margetis Dr. Robert Twieg Dr. John West Accepted by , Chair, Department of Physics Dr. James T. Gleeson , Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Dr. James L. Blank Table of Contents List of Figures . vii List of Tables . xv List of Publications . xvi Acknowledgments . xvii 1 Introduction ......................................1 1.1 Units and notation . .1 1.2 The standard model . .3 1.3 Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) . .5 1.4 Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) . .6 1.5 The coupling constant in QED and QCD . .7 1.6 Phase diagram of QCD . .9 1.6.1 Quark gluon plasma (QGP) . 12 1.6.2 The heavy-ion collision program . 12 1.6.3 Heavy-ion collisions stages . 13 1.7 Some definitions . 16 1.7.1 Rapidity . 16 1.7.2 Pseudorapidity . 16 1.7.3 Collisions centrality . 17 1.7.4 The Glauber model . 19 1.8 Collective flow . 21 iii 1.8.1 Radial flow . 22 1.8.2 Anisotropic flow . 22 1.9 Fluid dynamics . 26 1.10 Non-relativistic fluid dynamics . 26 1.10.1 Relativistic fluid dynamics .
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1912.09659V2 [Hep-Ph] 20 Mar 2020
    2 spontaneous chiral-symmetry breaking, i.e., quark con- responding nonrelativistic quark model assignments are densates, generates a diquark mass term, which behaves given of the spin and orbital angular momentum. differently from the other mass terms. We discuss how we can identify and determine the parameters of such a coupling term of the diquark effective Lagrangian. B. Scalar and pseudo-scalar diquarks in chiral This paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we SU(3)R × SU(3)L symmetry introduce diquarks and their local operator representa- tion, and formulate chiral effective theory in the chiral- In this paper, we concentrate on the scalar and pseu- symmetry limit. In Sec. III, explicit chiral-symmetry doscalar diquarks from the viewpoint of chiral symmetry. breaking due to the quark masses is introduced and its More specifically, we consider the first two states, Nos. 1 consequences are discussed. In Sec. IV, a numerical esti- and 2, from Table I, which have spin 0, color 3¯ and flavor mate is given for the parameters of the effective theory. 3.¯ We here see that these two diquarks are chiral part- We use the diquark masses calculated in lattice QCD and ners to each other, i.e., they belong to the same chiral also the experimental values of the singly heavy baryons. representation and therefore they would be degenerate if In Sec. V, a conclusion is given. the chiral symmetry is not broken. To see this, using the chiral projection operators, a PR;L ≡ (1 ± γ5)=2, we define the right quark, qR;i = a II.
    [Show full text]
  • Higgs and Particle Production in Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions
    Higgs and Particle Production in Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions Zhe Liu Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Columbia University 2016 c 2015 Zhe Liu All Rights Reserved Abstract Higgs and Particle Production in Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions Zhe Liu We apply a diagrammatic approach to study Higgs boson, a color-neutral heavy particle, pro- duction in nucleus-nucleus collisions in the saturation framework without quantum evolution. We assume the strong coupling constant much smaller than one. Due to the heavy mass and colorless nature of Higgs particle, final state interactions are absent in our calculation. In order to treat the two nuclei dynamically symmetric, we use the Coulomb gauge which gives the appropriate light cone gauge for each nucleus. To further eliminate initial state interactions we choose specific prescriptions in the light cone propagators. We start the calculation from only two nucleons in each nucleus and then demonstrate how to generalize the calculation to higher orders diagrammatically. We simplify the diagrams by the Slavnov-Taylor-Ward identities. The resulting cross section is factorized into a product of two Weizsäcker-Williams gluon distributions of the two nuclei when the transverse momentum of the produced scalar particle is around the saturation momentum. To our knowledge this is the first process where an exact analytic formula has been formed for a physical process, involving momenta on the order of the saturation momentum, in nucleus-nucleus collisions in the quasi-classical approximation. Since we have performed the calculation in an unconventional gauge choice, we further confirm our results in Feynman gauge where the Weizsäcker-Williams gluon distribution is interpreted as a transverse momentum broadening of a hard gluons traversing a nuclear medium.
    [Show full text]
  • Baryon Number Fluctuation and the Quark-Gluon Plasma
    Baryon Number Fluctuation and the Quark-Gluon Plasma Z. W. Lin and C. M. Ko Because of the fractional baryon number Using the generating function at of quarks, baryon and antibaryon number equilibrium, fluctuations in the quark-gluon plasma is less than those in the hadronic matter, making them plausible signatures for the quark-gluon plasma expected to be formed in relativistic heavy ion with g(l) = ∑ Pn = 1 due to normalization of collisions. To illustrate this possibility, we have the multiplicity probability distribution, it is introduced a kinetic model that takes into straightforward to obtain all moments of the account both production and annihilation of equilibrium multiplicity distribution. In terms of quark-antiquark or baryon-antibaryon pairs [1]. the fundamental unit of baryon number bo in the In the case of only baryon-antibaryon matter, the mean baryon number per event is production from and annihilation to two mesons, given by i.e., m1m2 ↔ BB , we have the following master equation for the multiplicity distribution of BB pairs: while the squared baryon number fluctuation per baryon at equilibrium is given by In obtaining the last expressions in Eqs. (5) and In the above, Pn(ϑ) denotes the probability of ϑ 〈σ 〉 (6), we have kept only the leading term in E finding n pairs of BB at time ; G ≡ G v 〈σ 〉 corresponding to the grand canonical limit, and L ≡ L v are the momentum-averaged cross sections for baryon production and E 1, as baryons and antibaryons are abundantly produced in heavy ion collisions at annihilation, respectively; Nk represents the total number of particle species k; and V is the proper RHIC.
    [Show full text]
  • Spectator Model in D Meson Decays
    Transaction B: Mechanical Engineering Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 140{148 c Sharif University of Technology, April 2009 Spectator Model in D Meson Decays H. Mehrban1 Abstract. In this research, the e ective Hamiltonian theory is described and applied to the calculation of current-current (Q1;2) and QCD penguin (Q3; ;6) decay rates. The channels of charm quark decay in the quark levels are: c ! dud, c ! dus, c ! sud and c ! sus where the channel c ! sud is dominant. The total decay rates of the hadronic of charm quark in the e ective Hamiltonian theory are calculated. The decay rates of D meson decays according to Spectator Quark Model (SQM) are investigated for the calculation of D meson decays. It is intended to make the transition from decay rates at the quark level to D meson decay rates for two body hadronic decays, D ! h1h2. By means of that, the modes of nonleptonic D ! PV , D ! PP , D ! VV decays where V and P are light vector with J P = 0 and pseudoscalar with J P = 1 mesons are analyzed, respectively. So, the total decay rates of the hadronic of charm quark in the e ective Hamiltonian theory, according to Colour Favoured (C-F) and Colour Suppressed (C-S) are obtained. Then the amplitude of the Colour Favoured and Colour Suppressed (F-S) processes are added and their decay rates are obtained. Using the spectator model, the branching ratio of some D meson decays are derived as well. Keywords: E ective Hamilton; c quark; D meson; Spectator model; Hadronic; Colour favoured; Colour suppressed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Generalization of the One-Dimensional Boson-Fermion Duality Through the Path-Integral Formalsim
    A Generalization of the One-Dimensional Boson-Fermion Duality Through the Path-Integral Formalism Satoshi Ohya Institute of Quantum Science, Nihon University, Kanda-Surugadai 1-8-14, Chiyoda, Tokyo 101-8308, Japan [email protected] (Dated: May 11, 2021) Abstract We study boson-fermion dualities in one-dimensional many-body problems of identical parti- cles interacting only through two-body contacts. By using the path-integral formalism as well as the configuration-space approach to indistinguishable particles, we find a generalization of the boson-fermion duality between the Lieb-Liniger model and the Cheon-Shigehara model. We present an explicit construction of n-boson and n-fermion models which are dual to each other and characterized by n−1 distinct (coordinate-dependent) coupling constants. These models enjoy the spectral equivalence, the boson-fermion mapping, and the strong-weak duality. We also discuss a scale-invariant generalization of the boson-fermion duality. arXiv:2105.04288v1 [quant-ph] 10 May 2021 1 1 Introduction Inhisseminalpaper[1] in 1960, Girardeau proved the one-to-one correspondence—the duality—between one-dimensional spinless bosons and fermions with hard-core interparticle interactions. By using this duality, he presented a celebrated example of the spectral equivalence between impenetrable bosons and free fermions. Since then, the one-dimensional boson-fermion duality has been a testing ground for studying strongly-interacting many-body problems, especially in the field of integrable models. So far there have been proposed several generalizations of the Girardeau’s finding, the most promi- nent of which was given by Cheon and Shigehara in 1998 [2]: they discovered the fermionic dual of the Lieb-Liniger model [3] by using the generalized pointlike interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Hadron Spectroscopy in the Diquark Model
    Hadron Spectroscopy in the Diquark Model Jacopo Ferretti University of Jyväskylä Diquark Correlations in Hadron Physics: Origin, Impact and Evidence September 23-27 2019, ECT*, Trento, Italy Jacopo Ferretti (University of Jyväskylä) hadron spectroscopy (diquark model) Sept 23-27 2019, ECT* 1 / 38 Summary Quark Model (QM) formalism Exotic hadrons and their interpretations Fully-heavy and heavy-light tetraquarks in the diquark model The problem of baryon missing resonances Strange and nonstrange baryons in the diquark model Jacopo Ferretti (University of Jyväskylä) hadron spectroscopy (diquark model) Sept 23-27 2019, ECT* 2 / 38 Constituent Quark Models Complicated quark-gluon dynamics of QCD 1. Effective degree of freedom of Constituent Quark is introduced: same quantum numbers as valence quarks mass ≈ 1=3 mass of the proton 3. Baryons ! bound states of 3 constituent quarks 4. Mesons ! bound states of a constituent quark-antiquark pair 5. Constituent quark dynamics ! phenomenological (QCD-inspired) interaction Phenomenological models q X 2 2 X αs H = p + m + − + βrij + V (Si ; Sj ; Lij ; rij ) i i r i i<j ij Coulomb-like + linear confining potentials + spin forces Several versions: Relativized Quark Model for baryons and mesons (Capstick and Isgur, Godfrey and Isgur); U(7) Model (Bijker, Iachello and Leviatan); Graz Model (Glozman and Riska); Hypercentral QM (Giannini and Santopinto), ... Reproduce reasonably well many hadron observables: baryon magnetic moments, lower part of baryon and meson spectrum, hadron strong decays, nucleon e.m. form factors ... Jacopo Ferretti (University of Jyväskylä) hadron spectroscopy (diquark model) Sept 23-27 2019, ECT* 3 / 38 Relativized Quark Model for Baryons/Mesons S.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Standard Model: Successes and Problems
    Searching for new particles at the Large Hadron Collider James Hirschauer (Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory) Sambamurti Memorial Lecture : August 7, 2017 Our current theory of the most fundamental laws of physics, known as the standard model (SM), works very well to explain many aspects of nature. Most recently, the Higgs boson, predicted to exist in the late 1960s, was discovered by the CMS and ATLAS collaborations at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN in 2012 [1] marking the first observation of the full spectrum of predicted SM particles. Despite the great success of this theory, there are several aspects of nature for which the SM description is completely lacking or unsatisfactory, including the identity of the astronomically observed dark matter and the mass of newly discovered Higgs boson. These and other apparent limitations of the SM motivate the search for new phenomena beyond the SM either directly at the LHC or indirectly with lower energy, high precision experiments. In these proceedings, the successes and some of the shortcomings of the SM are described, followed by a description of the methods and status of the search for new phenomena at the LHC, with some focus on supersymmetry (SUSY) [2], a specific theory of physics beyond the standard model (BSM). 1 Standard model: successes and problems The standard model of particle physics describes the interactions of fundamental matter particles (quarks and leptons) via the fundamental forces (mediated by the force carrying particles: the photon, gluon, and weak bosons). The Higgs boson, also a fundamental SM particle, plays a central role in the mechanism that determines the masses of the photon and weak bosons, as well as the rest of the standard model particles.
    [Show full text]
  • Diffractive Dissociation of Alpha Particles As a Test of Isophobic Short-Range Correlations Inside Nuclei ∗ Jennifer Rittenhouse West A, , Stanley J
    Physics Letters B 805 (2020) 135423 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physics Letters B www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb Diffractive dissociation of alpha particles as a test of isophobic short-range correlations inside nuclei ∗ Jennifer Rittenhouse West a, , Stanley J. Brodsky a, Guy F. de Téramond b, Iván Schmidt c a SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309, USA b Laboratorio de Física Teórica y Computacional, Universidad de Costa Rica, 11501 San José, Costa Rica c Departamento de Física y Centro Científico Tecnológico de Valparáiso-CCTVal, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Casilla 110-V, Valparaíso, Chile a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: The CLAS collaboration at Jefferson Laboratory has compared nuclear parton distributions for a range Received 15 January 2020 of nuclear targets and found that the EMC effect measured in deep inelastic lepton-nucleus scattering Received in revised form 9 April 2020 has a strongly “isophobic” nature. This surprising observation suggests short-range correlations between Accepted 9 April 2020 neighboring n and p nucleons in nuclear wavefunctions that are much stronger compared to p − p or n − Available online 14 April 2020 n correlations. In this paper we propose a definitive experimental test of the nucleon-nucleon explanation Editor: W. Haxton of the isophobic nature of the EMC effect: the diffractive dissociation on a nuclear target A of high energy 4 He nuclei to pairs of nucleons n and p with high relative transverse momentum, α + A → n + p + A + X. The comparison of n − p events with p − p and n − n events directly tests the postulated breaking of isospin symmetry.
    [Show full text]
  • HADRONIC DECAYS of the Ds MESON and a MODEL-INDEPENDENT DETERMINATION of the BRANCHING FRACTION
    SLAC-R-95-470 UC-414 HADRONIC DECAYS OF THE Ds MESON AND A MODEL-INDEPENDENT DETERMINATION OF THE BRANCHING FRACTION FOR THE Ds DECAY OF THE PHI PI* John Nicholas Synodinos Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford University Stanford, California 94309 To the memory of my parents, July 1995 Alexander and Cnryssoula Synodinos Prepared for the Department of Energy under contract number DE-AC03-76SF00515 Printed in the United States of America. Available from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161. *Ph.D. thesis 0lSr^BUTlONoFT^ J "OFTH/3DOCUM*.~ ^ Abstract Acknowledgements During the running periods of the years 1992, 1993, 1994 the BES experiment at This work would not have been possible without the continuing guidance and support the Beijing Electron Positron Collider (BEPC) collected 22.9 ± 0.7pt_1 of data at an from BES collaborators, fellow graduate students, family members and friends. It is energy of 4.03 GeV, which corresponds to a local peak for e+e~ —* DfD~ production. difficult to give proper recognition to all of them, and I wish to apologize up front to Four Ds hadronic decay modes were tagged: anyone whose contributions I have overlooked in these acknowledgements. I owe many thanks to my advisor, Jonathan Dorfan, for providing me with guid• • D -> <t>w; <t> -* K+K~ s ance and encouragement. It was a priviledge to have been his graduate student. I wish to thank Bill Dunwoodie for his day to day advice. His understanding of physics • Ds~> 7F(892)°A'; 7F°(892) -> K~JT+ and his willingness to share his knowledge have been essential to the completion of • D -» WK; ~K° -> -K+TT- s this analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Qt7r7253zd.Pdf
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work Title RELATIVISTIC QUARK MODEL BASED ON THE VENEZIANO REPRESENTATION. II. GENERAL TRAJECTORIES Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7r7253zd Author Mandelstam, Stanley. Publication Date 1969-09-02 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Submitted to Physical Review UCRL- 19327 Preprint 7. z RELATIVISTIC QUARK MODEL BASED ON THE VENEZIANO REPRESENTATION. II. GENERAL TRAJECTORIES RECEIVED LAWRENCE RADIATION LABORATORY Stanley Mandeistam SEP25 1969 September 2, 1969 LIBRARY AND DOCUMENTS SECTiON AEC Contract No. W7405-eng-48 TWO-WEEK LOAN COPY 4 This is a Library Circulating Copy whIch may be borrowed for two weeks. for a personal retention copy, call Tech. Info. Dlvislon, Ext. 5545 I C.) LAWRENCE RADIATION LABORATOR SLJ-LJ UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA BERKELET DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor the Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or the Regents of the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof or the Regents of the University of California.
    [Show full text]