Arxiv:1912.09659V2 [Hep-Ph] 20 Mar 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
2 spontaneous chiral-symmetry breaking, i.e., quark con- responding nonrelativistic quark model assignments are densates, generates a diquark mass term, which behaves given of the spin and orbital angular momentum. differently from the other mass terms. We discuss how we can identify and determine the parameters of such a coupling term of the diquark effective Lagrangian. B. Scalar and pseudo-scalar diquarks in chiral This paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we SU(3)R × SU(3)L symmetry introduce diquarks and their local operator representa- tion, and formulate chiral effective theory in the chiral- In this paper, we concentrate on the scalar and pseu- symmetry limit. In Sec. III, explicit chiral-symmetry doscalar diquarks from the viewpoint of chiral symmetry. breaking due to the quark masses is introduced and its More specifically, we consider the first two states, Nos. 1 consequences are discussed. In Sec. IV, a numerical esti- and 2, from Table I, which have spin 0, color 3¯ and flavor mate is given for the parameters of the effective theory. 3.¯ We here see that these two diquarks are chiral part- We use the diquark masses calculated in lattice QCD and ners to each other, i.e., they belong to the same chiral also the experimental values of the singly heavy baryons. representation and therefore they would be degenerate if In Sec. V, a conclusion is given. the chiral symmetry is not broken. To see this, using the chiral projection operators, a PR;L ≡ (1 ± γ5)=2, we define the right quark, qR;i = a II. DIQUARK EFFECTIVE THEORY PR qi , as a (3,1) representation of chiral SU(3)R × a a SU(3)L symmetry, and the left quark, qL;i = PL qi , as a A. Diquark operators in flavor SU(3) symmetry (1,3) representation. Explicitly, they transform as a a qR;i ! (UR)ijqR;j;UR 2 SU(3)R (2) In order to study the transformation properties of the qa ! (U ) qa ;U 2 SU(3) : (3) diquark systems, we consider properties of QCD compos- L;i L ij L;j L L ite operators made of two quark fields. We employ the Then we construct \right" and \left" spin-0 diquark op- a ¯ flavor SU(3) basis for the quark operators, qα,i, where a erators with color 3 as is color, α is Dirac, i is flavor index of the quark. Then da ≡ abc (qbT C qc ); (4) local diquark operators are defined by R;i ijk R;j R;k da ≡ abc (qbT C qc ): (5) T a b L;i ijk L;j L;k (qi Γqj) = (qα,i (Γ)αβ qβ;j); (1) It is straightforward to show that dR and dL belong to where T denotes the transpose for the Dirac index and Γ chiral (3¯; 1) and (1; 3)¯ representation, respectively, and is a relevant combination of the Dirac gamma matrices. transform as Possible combinations satisfying the Lorentz covariance da ! da (U y ) ; (3¯; 1); (6) and the Pauli principle for quarks are given in Table I. R;i R;j R ji a a y ¯ dL;i ! dL;j (UL)ji; (1; 3): (7) J π color flavor 2S+1L J The other diquark operators are also decomposed in the T 3¯ − ¯ ¯ 3 1 (q Cq)A 0 3 3 P0 chiral basis similarly, as shown in Table II B. First two T 5 3¯ + ¯ ¯ 1 2 (q Cγ q)A 0 3 3 S0 of them are the diquarks that we concern in this paper. T µ 5 3¯ − ¯ ¯ 3 3 (q Cγ γ q)A 1 3 3 P1 T µ 3¯ + ¯ 3 4 (q Cγ q)S 1 3 6 S1 spin color chiral T µν 3¯ + − ¯ 3 1 a bT c ¯ ¯ 5 (q Cσ q)S 1 ; 1 3 6 D1; P1 dR;i = abcijk(qR;j CqR;k) 0 3 (3; 1) T 6 − 3 a bT c ¯ ¯ 6 (q Cq)S 0 6 6 P0 dL;i = abcijk(qL;j CqL;k) 0 3 (1; 3) 7 (qT Cγ5q)6 0+ 6 6 1S a,µ bT µ c ¯ S 0 d(i;j) = abc(qL;iCγ qR;j ) 1 3 (3; 3) T µ 5 6 − 3 a,µν bT µν c 8 (q Cγ γ q)S 1 6 6 P1 ¯ dRfijg = abc(qR;iCσ qR;j ) 1 3 (6; 1) T µ 6 + ¯ 3 9 (q Cγ q)A 1 6 3 S1 a,µν bT µν c ¯ dLfijg = abc(qL;iCσ qL;j ) 1 3 (1; 6) T µν 6 + − ¯ 3 1 10 (q Cσ q)A 1 ; 1 6 3 D1; P1 ~fabg aT b aT b dRfijg = (qR;iCqR;j + qR;j CqR;i) 0 6 (6; 1) ~fabg aT b aT b dLfijg = (qL;iCqL;j + qL;j CqL;i) 0 6 (1; 6) 0 2 ~fabg,µ aT µ b bT µ a TABLE I. Local diquark operators. C = iγ γ is the charge d(i;j) = (qL;iCγ qR;j + qL;iCγ qR;j ) 1 6 (3; 3) conjugation Dirac matrix. The rightmost column shows the ~fabg,µν aT µν b ¯ dR;i = ijk(qR;j Cσ qR;k) 1 6 (3; 1) relevant quantum states for two (nonrelativistic) quarks. ~fabg,µν aT µν b ¯ dL;i = ijk(qL;j Cσ qL;k) 1 6 (1; 3) The first five operators belong to the total color 3¯ rep- TABLE II. Local diquark operators in the chiral basis. resentation, i.e., color antisymmetric combinations, while the lower five are in the color symmetric 6 representation. The indices S (symmetric) and A (antisymmetric) des- The diquarks given above are not eigenstates of parity. ignate the flavor symmetry. In the last column, the cor- Using the parity transform of the quark operators, P : 3 a 0 a a 0 a qiR(t; x) ! γ qiL(t; −x), qiL(t; x) ! γ qiR(t; −x), the Here we truncate the interaction terms with more than spin-0 diquarks are found to transform as two Σ’s. We also omit ΣΣy and ΣyΣ terms, since they + a a a a do not contribute to the mass difference between the 0 P : dR;i ! −dL;i; dL;i ! −dR;i: (8) and 0− states. V (Σ), which is not shown explicitly, de- notes the interaction potential terms for the meson fields Thus the Lorentz scalar, S (J π = 0+), and pseudoscalar, that cause the spontaneous symmetry breaking, Eq. (12). P (0−), operators can be identified by Hereafter, we will omit the kinetic and potential parts of a 1 a a 1 abc bT c the mesons, because we consider only the mean fields of S = p (d − d ) = p ijk(q Cγ5 q ); (9) i 2 R;i L;i 2 j k the mesons. As the diquark is not a color-singlet state, we have a 1 a a 1 abc bT c Pi = p (dR;i + dL;i) = p ijk(qj C qk): (10) introduced a color-gauge-covariant derivative in Eq. (16), 2 2 α α Dµ = @µ + igT Gµ, with Gµ being the gluon field, and These relations show that the scalar and pseudoscalar T α the color SU(3) generator for the 3¯ representation. diquarks, given as Nos. 1 and 2 of Table I, belong to (3¯; 1) All the color indices are contracted and not explicitly and (1; 3)¯ representations of chiral symmetry. Thus, we written. The kinetic energy term of the gluons fields is conclude that the scalar and pseudoscalar diquarks are also omitted. chiral partners. It is easy to check that the Lagrangian, Eq.(16), is chiral invariant and parity conserving. We may rewrite the Lagrangian in terms of the parity eigenstates, Eqs. (9) C. Chiral Lagrangian in the chiral limit and (10), as µ y µ y We now introduce the chiral (3,3)¯ meson fields Σ, L = DµSi (D Si) + DµPi (D Pi) 2 y y which contain nonet pseudoscalar and nonet scalar −m0(SiSi + PiPi ) mesons. Their chiral transform is given by m2 − 1 (−S σ Sy + P σ P y − iS π P y + iP π Sy) y ¯ f i ij j i ij j i ij j i ij j Σij ≡ σij + iπij ! UL;ikΣkmUR;mj (3; 3) (11) m2 where σ represents a scalar nonet, and π a pseudoscalar − 2 −S (σ σ − π π )Sy 2f 2 ijk `mn k `i mj `i mj n nonet. Σ transforms under the spatial inversion as P : y y y Σ ! Σ . Chiral symmetry is spontaneously broken by +Pk(σ`iσmj − π`iπmj)Pn + iSk(π`iσmj + σ`iπmj)Pn the vacuum state, which is represented by the vacuum y −iPk(π`iσmj + σ`iπmj)Sn (17) expectation value (VEV) of the scalar field σ as hΣ i = hσ i = fδ ; hπ i = 0 (12) ij ij ij ij D. Masses of the diquarks and generalized where f is the pion decay constant. For this vacuum, Goldberger-Treiman relation πij is the nonet of massless Nambu-Goldstone bosons. To read off the conventional meson contents from Σ, one In the mean field approximation, keeping the SU(3) uses the Gell-Mann matrices, λp, as symmetry, hΣiji = fδij, the masses of the diquarks are read from Σij ≡ (λp)ij(σp + iπp) (13) L = −m2(d dy + d dy ) 1 y mass 0 R;i R;i L;i L;i σp = Tr λp(Σ + Σ ) ; (14) 4 2 2 y y −(m1 + m2)(dR;idL;i + dL;idR;i); (18) 1 y πp = Tr λp(Σ − Σ ) : (15) 4i which leads to the mass matrix for (dR;i; dL;i) as Note that σ and π contain the flavor singlet components, m2 m2 + m2 for which we use λ = p2=31 with the unit matrix 1.