DOCSLIB.ORG

Higgs and Particle Production in Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Higgs and Particle Production in Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions Higgs and Particle Production in Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions Zhe Liu Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Columbia University 2016 c 2015 Zhe Liu All Rights Reserved Abstract Higgs and Particle Production in Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions Zhe Liu We apply a diagrammatic approach to study Higgs boson, a color-neutral heavy particle, pro- duction in nucleus-nucleus collisions in the saturation framework without quantum evolution. We assume the strong coupling constant much smaller than one. Due to the heavy mass and colorless nature of Higgs particle, final state interactions are absent in our calculation. In order to treat the two nuclei dynamically symmetric, we use the Coulomb gauge which gives the appropriate light cone gauge for each nucleus. To further eliminate initial state interactions we choose specific prescriptions in the light cone propagators. We start the calculation from only two nucleons in each nucleus and then demonstrate how to generalize the calculation to higher orders diagrammatically. We simplify the diagrams by the Slavnov-Taylor-Ward identities. The resulting cross section is factorized into a product of two Weizsäcker-Williams gluon distributions of the two nuclei when the transverse momentum of the produced scalar particle is around the saturation momentum. To our knowledge this is the first process where an exact analytic formula has been formed for a physical process, involving momenta on the order of the saturation momentum, in nucleus-nucleus collisions in the quasi-classical approximation. Since we have performed the calculation in an unconventional gauge choice, we further confirm our results in Feynman gauge where the Weizsäcker-Williams gluon distribution is interpreted as a transverse momentum broadening of a hard gluons traversing a nuclear medium. The transverse momentum factorization manifests itself in light cone gauge but not so clearly in Feynman gauge. In saturation physics there are two different unintegrated gluon distributions usually encountered in the literature: the Weizsäcker-Williams gluon distribution and the dipole gluon distribution. The first gluon distribution is constructed by solving classical Yang-Mills equation of motion in the McLerran-Venugopalan model, while the second gluon distribution is related to the dipole scattering amplitude. So far, the quantum structure of the dipole gluon distribution has not been thoroughly investigated. Applying the same diagrammatic techniques, we carry out a detail study of the quantum structure of the color dipole gluon distribution, and then compare it with that of the Weizsäcker-Williams gluon distribution. Table of Contents List of Figures . iv List of Tables . ix 1 Introduction1 2 Theory of Strong Interactions6 2.1 A Brief History of Strong Interactions . .6 2.1.1 The Quark Model . .6 2.1.2 The Theory of Strong Interactions . .9 2.2 Quantum Chromodynamics . 11 2.3 Light Cone Variables . 13 2.4 Quantize QCD on the Light Cone . 17 2.4.1 Light Cone Propagator . 18 2.4.2 Perturbation Theory on the Light Cone . 18 3 High Energy Evolution Equations in QCD 22 3.1 Deep Inelastic Scattering . 23 3.2 DGLAP Equation . 27 3.3 Regge Theory . 30 3.4 BFKL Evolution Equation . 32 3.4.1 Quark-quark Scattering . 33 3.4.2 DIS at Small-x .............................. 35 i 3.4.3 Dipole Formalism . 37 3.4.4 Problems in BFKL Evolution . 38 3.5 Saturation of the Gluon Density . 39 3.6 A Map of Parton Evolution in QCD . 41 Low Density Region . 43 High Density Region . 43 Saturation Region . 44 4 Parton Saturation in Large Nuclei 45 4.1 Saturation in Large Nuclei . 45 4.2 Gluon Distribution in Large Nuclei . 48 4.2.1 Weizsäcker-Williams Gluon Distribution . 48 4.2.2 Dipole Gluon Distribution . 49 4.3 Non-linear Evolution Equations . 53 4.3.1 JIMWLK Evolution . 53 4.3.2 BK Evolution . 54 4.4 Quantum Structure of the Weizsäcker-Williams Gluon Distribution . 57 4.4.1 STW Identities . 58 4.4.2 Quantum Structure of the Weizsäcker-Williams Gluon Distribution . 61 i Prescriptions in Light Cone Propagator . 63 Diagrammatic Calculation . 64 5 Particle Production in Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions 71 5.1 Parton Distribution and Factorization . 72 5.1.1 Collinear Factorization . 72 5.1.2 Transverse Momentum Dependent Factorization . 76 5.2 Color-Neutral Heavy particle Production in Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions . 78 5.3 Coulomb and Light Cone Gauges . 81 5.4 Light Cone Calculation of Scalar Particle Production . 84 ii 5.5 Feynman Gauge Calculation . 94 6 Quantum Structure of Dipole Gluon Distribution 100 6.1 Introduction . 101 6.2 Gluon Production in Proton-Nucleus Collisions . 105 6.2.1 From Proton-Proton Collisions to Proton-Nucleus Collisions . 107 6.3 Quantum Structure of the Dipole Gluon Distribution . 111 6.4 Comparison . 119 Bibliography 120 Appendix 125 A.1 Diagrammatic Representation of STW Identities in Non-Abelian Gauge Field 125 A.2 Other Choices of i’s ............................... 127 A.3 Lipatov Vertex in Feynman Gauge . 130 iii List of Figures 2 2.1 A summary of measurements of the coupling αs(Q ), which is taken from [55]. Q is the momentum scale at which the measurement was made. The data clearly indicate that as the energy increases the strength of the QCD coupling constant decreases. 14 2.2 Light cone coordinates and the usual space-time coordinates. 15 2.3 A bare quark emits a soft gluon in the infinite momentum frame. The plus sign indicates that the quark carries a large plus momentum component. The dashed vertical line at t = 0 indicates that the quark-gluon state is measured. r and r0 label the quark helicity. 19 3.1 Deep inelastic scattering. l is the momentum of the incoming lepton and q is the momentum transfer between the lepton and the proton. γ∗ is a virtual photon. 23 3.2 The handbag diagram in DIS. γ∗ represents the virtual photon and it scatters with a quark from the proton. The filled circle represents the proton. The vertical dashed line represents the final state cut. 24 2 3.3 Structure function F2 as a function of Q from a combination of modern experimental data [63]. For moderate values of x, there is a good agreement between the data and Bjorken scaling. 26 3.4 QCD corrections to the γ∗q vertex in the parton model. The wavy line not labeled by γ∗ are gluons. 27 iv 3.5 Ladder diagram for gluon cascade in the DGLAP evolution. The proton, carrying longitudinal momentum p+ and no transverse momentum, splits into gluons with smaller and smaller plus momentum components but bigger and bigger transverse momentum components. 29 3.6 The imaginary part of the quark-quark elastic scattering amplitude with exchange of a gluon ladder. The filled circles represent the Lipatov vertices. The double wavy line represents the reggeized gluons. The gluon ladder is often called BFKL ladder. 32 3.7 Deep inelastic scattering at low x with BFKL evolution in the Bjorken frame. The circle at the center represents the full BFKL ladder in Fig. 3.6...... 35 3.8 BFKL evolution in DIS in the dipole frame. The virtual photon first splits into a quark-antiquark pair, a dipole. Then, gluon cascades are developed in the dipole wavefunction. The density of the dipoles increases according to the dipole form of the BFKL equation. 37 3.9 A phase diagram of parton evolution in QCD. A filled circle represents a parton with transverse size 1=Q2 and rapidity y. The solid line represents ∼ the boundary between a dilute parton system and a dense parton system. 42 4.1 A quark scatters on two nucleons in Feynman gauge. The circles represent the nucleons. The vertical line on the third diagram denotes the fact that the quark is put on-shell between the two scatterings. Thus, successively scatterings become independent in Feynman gauge. 49 4.2 Quark-quark and Quark-dipole scatterings in Feynman gauge. The transverse coordinates of the quark and antiquark in the dipole are x? and 0?, respectively. The arrows on the line indicate momentum flows. 51 v 4.3 A graphical representation of the S-matrix of a dipole scattering on a nucleus. The S-matrix can be equivalently represented as the quark-nucleus scattering amplitude squared or the dipole-nucleus scattering amplitude. The vertical line on the left side of the identity indicates a final state cut. 0? and x? are the transverse coordinates of the quark in the amplitude and the complex conjugate amplitude. 53 4.4 Figs. 4.4(a) to 4.4(c) represent the amplitude squared of a dipole emitting a gluon. Their sum can be denoted by Fig. 4.4(d) in the large Nc limit, where the emitted gluon is replaced by a double quark line. x1? and x0? are the transverse coordinates of the quark and the anti-quark. The transverse coordinate of the emitted gluon at the final state is x2?............ 55 4.5 A graphical representation of the two terms in the Balitsky-Kovchegov equation, Eq. (4.29). A dipole of size x01? is splitted into two separate dipoles of sizes x02? and x21?, respectively. The interaction with the nucleus can happen before and after the dipole splitting. Fig. 4.5(a) is the real gluon emission term, while Figs. 4.5(b) and 4.5(c) are the virtual terms. 56 4.6 A generalized Ward identity in non-Abelian gauge theory. The solid lines represent on-shell particle states, the dashed line represents a longitudinally polarized gluon. 58 4.7 STW identities for fermion and quark propagators. An external gluon state when multiplied by its four momentum becomes a longitudinally polarized gluon.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Baryon Number Fluctuation and the Quark-Gluon Plasma
    Baryon Number Fluctuation and the Quark-Gluon Plasma Z. W. Lin and C. M. Ko Because of the fractional baryon number Using the generating function at of quarks, baryon and antibaryon number equilibrium, fluctuations in the quark-gluon plasma is less than those in the hadronic matter, making them plausible signatures for the quark-gluon plasma expected to be formed in relativistic heavy ion with g(l) = ∑ Pn = 1 due to normalization of collisions. To illustrate this possibility, we have the multiplicity probability distribution, it is introduced a kinetic model that takes into straightforward to obtain all moments of the account both production and annihilation of equilibrium multiplicity distribution. In terms of quark-antiquark or baryon-antibaryon pairs [1]. the fundamental unit of baryon number bo in the In the case of only baryon-antibaryon matter, the mean baryon number per event is production from and annihilation to two mesons, given by i.e., m1m2 ↔ BB , we have the following master equation for the multiplicity distribution of BB pairs: while the squared baryon number fluctuation per baryon at equilibrium is given by In obtaining the last expressions in Eqs. (5) and In the above, Pn(ϑ) denotes the probability of ϑ 〈σ 〉 (6), we have kept only the leading term in E finding n pairs of BB at time ; G ≡ G v 〈σ 〉 corresponding to the grand canonical limit, and L ≡ L v are the momentum-averaged cross sections for baryon production and E 1, as baryons and antibaryons are abundantly produced in heavy ion collisions at annihilation, respectively; Nk represents the total number of particle species k; and V is the proper RHIC.
    [Show full text]
  • Fully Strange Tetraquark Sss¯S¯ Spectrum and Possible Experimental Evidence
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 103, 016016 (2021) Fully strange tetraquark sss¯s¯ spectrum and possible experimental evidence † Feng-Xiao Liu ,1,2 Ming-Sheng Liu,1,2 Xian-Hui Zhong,1,2,* and Qiang Zhao3,4,2, 1Department of Physics, Hunan Normal University, and Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control of Ministry of Education, Changsha 410081, China 2Synergetic Innovation Center for Quantum Effects and Applications (SICQEA), Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China 3Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 4University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China (Received 21 August 2020; accepted 5 January 2021; published 26 January 2021) In this work, we construct 36 tetraquark configurations for the 1S-, 1P-, and 2S-wave states, and make a prediction of the mass spectrum for the tetraquark sss¯s¯ system in the framework of a nonrelativistic potential quark model without the diquark-antidiquark approximation. The model parameters are well determined by our previous study of the strangeonium spectrum. We find that the resonances f0ð2200Þ and 2340 2218 2378 f2ð Þ may favor the assignments of ground states Tðsss¯s¯Þ0þþ ð Þ and Tðsss¯s¯Þ2þþ ð Þ, respectively, and the newly observed Xð2500Þ at BESIII may be a candidate of the lowest mass 1P-wave 0−þ state − 2481 0þþ 2440 Tðsss¯s¯Þ0 þ ð Þ. Signals for the other ground state Tðsss¯s¯Þ0þþ ð Þ may also have been observed in PC −− the ϕϕ invariant mass spectrum in J=ψ → γϕϕ at BESIII. The masses of the J ¼ 1 Tsss¯s¯ states are predicted to be in the range of ∼2.44–2.99 GeV, which indicates that the ϕð2170Þ resonance may not be a good candidate of the Tsss¯s¯ state.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0810.4453V1 [Hep-Ph] 24 Oct 2008
    The Physics of Glueballs Vincent Mathieu Groupe de Physique Nucl´eaire Th´eorique, Universit´e de Mons-Hainaut, Acad´emie universitaire Wallonie-Bruxelles, Place du Parc 20, BE-7000 Mons, Belgium. [email protected] Nikolai Kochelev Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow region, 141980 Russia. [email protected] Vicente Vento Departament de F´ısica Te`orica and Institut de F´ısica Corpuscular, Universitat de Val`encia-CSIC, E-46100 Burjassot (Valencia), Spain. [email protected] Glueballs are particles whose valence degrees of freedom are gluons and therefore in their descrip- tion the gauge field plays a dominant role. We review recent results in the physics of glueballs with the aim set on phenomenology and discuss the possibility of finding them in conventional hadronic experiments and in the Quark Gluon Plasma. In order to describe their properties we resort to a va- riety of theoretical treatments which include, lattice QCD, constituent models, AdS/QCD methods, and QCD sum rules. The review is supposed to be an informed guide to the literature. Therefore, we do not discuss in detail technical developments but refer the reader to the appropriate references. I. INTRODUCTION Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) is the theory of the hadronic interactions. It is an elegant theory whose full non perturbative solution has escaped our knowledge since its formulation more than 30 years ago.[1] The theory is asymptotically free[2, 3] and confining.[4] A particularly good test of our understanding of the nonperturbative aspects of QCD is to study particles where the gauge field plays a more important dynamical role than in the standard hadrons.
    [Show full text]
  • Observation of Global Hyperon Polarization in Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Nuclear Physics A 967 (2017) 760–763 www.elsevier.com/locate/nuclphysa Observation of Global Hyperon Polarization in Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions Isaac Upsal for the STAR Collaboration1 Ohio State University, 191 W. Woodruff Ave., Columbus, OH 43210 Abstract Collisions between heavy nuclei at ultra-relativistic energies form a color-deconfined state of matter known as the quark-gluon plasma. This state is well described by hydrodynamics, and non-central collisions are expected to produce a fluid characterized by strong vorticity in the presence of strong external magnetic fields. The STAR Collaboration at Brookhaven National Laboratory’s√ Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) has measured collisions between gold nuclei at center of mass energies sNN = 7.7 − 200 GeV. We report the first observation of globally polarized Λ and Λ hyperons, aligned with the angular momentum of the colliding system. These measurements provide important information on partonic spin-orbit coupling, the vorticity of the quark-gluon plasma, and the magnetic field generated in the collision. 1. Introduction Collisions of nuclei at ultra-relativistic energies create a system of deconfined colored quarks and glu- ons, called the quark-gluon plasma (QGP). The large angular momentum (∼104−5) present in non-central collisions may produce a polarized QGP, in which quarks are polarized through spin-orbit coupling in QCD [1, 2, 3]. The polarization would be transmitted to hadrons in the final state and could be detectable through global hyperon polarization. Global hyperon polarization refers to the phenomenon in which the spin of Λ (and Λ) hyperons is corre- lated with the net angular momentum of the QGP which is perpendicular to the reaction plane, spanned by pbeam and b, where b is the impact parameter vector of the collision and pbeam is the beam momentum.
    [Show full text]
  • Charm and Strange Quark Contributions to the Proton Structure
    Report series ISSN 0284 - 2769 of SE9900247 THE SVEDBERG LABORATORY and \ DEPARTMENT OF RADIATION SCIENCES UPPSALA UNIVERSITY Box 533, S-75121 Uppsala, Sweden http://www.tsl.uu.se/ TSL/ISV-99-0204 February 1999 Charm and Strange Quark Contributions to the Proton Structure Kristel Torokoff1 Dept. of Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 535, S-751 21 Uppsala, Sweden Abstract: The possibility to have charm and strange quarks as quantum mechanical fluc- tuations in the proton wave function is investigated based on a model for non-perturbative QCD dynamics. Both hadron and parton basis are examined. A scheme for energy fluctu- ations is constructed and compared with explicit energy-momentum conservation. Resulting momentum distributions for charniand_strange quarks in the proton are derived at the start- ing scale Qo f°r the perturbative QCD evolution. Kinematical constraints are found to be important when comparing to the "intrinsic charm" model. Master of Science Thesis Linkoping University Supervisor: Gunnar Ingelman, Uppsala University 1 kuldsepp@tsl .uu.se 30-37 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Standard Model 3 2.1 Introductory QCD 4 2.2 Light-cone variables 5 3 Experiments 7 3.1 The HERA machine 7 3.2 Deep Inelastic Scattering 8 4 Theory 11 4.1 The Parton model 11 4.2 The structure functions 12 4.3 Perturbative QCD corrections 13 4.4 The DGLAP equations 14 5 The Edin-Ingelman Model 15 6 Heavy Quarks in the Proton Wave Function 19 6.1 Extrinsic charm 19 6.2 Intrinsic charm 20 6.3 Hadronisation 22 6.4 The El-model applied to heavy quarks
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of Gluon
    Discovery of the Gluon Physics 290E Seminar, Spring 2020 Outline – Knowledge known at the time – Theory behind the discovery of the gluon – Key predicted interactions – Jet properties – Relevant experiments – Analysis techniques – Experimental results – Current research pertaining to gluons – Conclusion Knowledge known at the time The year is 1978, During this time, particle physics was arguable a mature subject. 5 of the 6 quarks were discovered by this point (the bottom quark being the most recent), and the only gauge boson that was known was the photon. There was also a theory of the strong interaction, quantum chromodynamics, that had been developed up to this point by Yang, Mills, Gell-Mann, Fritzsch, Leutwyler, and others. Trying to understand the structure of hadrons. Gluons can self-interact! Theory behind the discovery Analogous to QED, the strong interaction between quarks and gluons with a gauge group of SU(3) symmetry is known as quantum chromodynamics (QCD). Where the force mediating particle is the gluon. In QCD, we have some quite particular features such as asymptotic freedom and confinement. 4 α Short range:V (r) = − s QCD 3 r 4 α Long range: V (r) = − s + kr QCD 3 r (Between a quark and antiquark) Quantum fluctuations cause the bare color charge to be screened causes coupling strength to vary. Features are important for an understanding of jet formation. Theory behind the discovery John Ellis postulated the search for the gluon through bremsstrahlung radiation in electron- proton annihilation processes in 1976. Such a process will produce jets of hadrons: e−e+ qq¯g Furthermore, Mary Gaillard, Graham Ross, and John Ellis wrote a paper (“Search for Gluons in e+e- Annihilation.”) that described that the PETRA collider at DESY and the PEP collider at SLAC should be able to observe this process.
    [Show full text]
  • Observation of Structure in the J/Ψ-Pair Mass Spectrum
    EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-EP-2020-115 LHCb-PAPER-2020-011 CERN-EP-2020-115June 30, 2020 22 June 2020 Observation of structure in the J= -pair mass spectrum LHCb collaborationy Abstract p Using proton-proton collision data at centre-of-mass energies of s = 7, 8 and 13 TeV recorded by the LHCb experiment at the Large Hadron Collider, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 9 fb−1, the invariant mass spectrum of J= pairs is studied. A narrow structure around 6:9 GeV/c2 matching the lineshape of a resonance and a broad structure just above twice the J= mass are observed. The deviation of the data from nonresonant J= -pair production is above five standard deviations in the mass region between 6:2 and 7:4 GeV/c2, covering predicted masses of states composed of four charm quarks. The mass and natural width of the narrow X(6900) structure are measured assuming a Breit{Wigner lineshape. Submitted to Science Bulletin c 2020 CERN for the benefit of the LHCb collaboration. CC BY 4.0 licence. yAuthors are listed at the end of this paper. ii 1 1 Introduction 2 The strong interaction is one of the fundamental forces of nature and it governs the 3 dynamics of quarks and gluons. According to quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the 4 theory describing the strong interaction, quarks are confined into hadrons, in agreement 5 with experimental observations. The quark model [1,2] classifies hadrons into conventional 6 mesons (qq) and baryons (qqq or qqq), and also allows for the existence of exotic hadrons 7 such as tetraquarks (qqqq) and pentaquarks (qqqqq).
    [Show full text]
  • Phenomenological Review on Quark–Gluon Plasma: Concepts Vs
    Review Phenomenological Review on Quark–Gluon Plasma: Concepts vs. Observations Roman Pasechnik 1,* and Michal Šumbera 2 1 Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Lund University, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden 2 Nuclear Physics Institute ASCR 250 68 Rez/Prague,ˇ Czech Republic; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: In this review, we present an up-to-date phenomenological summary of research developments in the physics of the Quark–Gluon Plasma (QGP). A short historical perspective and theoretical motivation for this rapidly developing field of contemporary particle physics is provided. In addition, we introduce and discuss the role of the quantum chromodynamics (QCD) ground state, non-perturbative and lattice QCD results on the QGP properties, as well as the transport models used to make a connection between theory and experiment. The experimental part presents the selected results on bulk observables, hard and penetrating probes obtained in the ultra-relativistic heavy-ion experiments carried out at the Brookhaven National Laboratory Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (BNL RHIC) and CERN Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) and Large Hadron Collider (LHC) accelerators. We also give a brief overview of new developments related to the ongoing searches of the QCD critical point and to the collectivity in small (p + p and p + A) systems. Keywords: extreme states of matter; heavy ion collisions; QCD critical point; quark–gluon plasma; saturation phenomena; QCD vacuum PACS: 25.75.-q, 12.38.Mh, 25.75.Nq, 21.65.Qr 1. Introduction Quark–gluon plasma (QGP) is a new state of nuclear matter existing at extremely high temperatures and densities when composite states called hadrons (protons, neutrons, pions, etc.) lose their identity and dissolve into a soup of their constituents—quarks and gluons.
    [Show full text]
  • The 21St-Century Electron Microscope for the Study of the Fundamental Structure of Matter
    The Electron-Ion Collider The 21st-Century Electron Microscope for the Study of the Fundamental Structure of Matter 60 ) milner mit physics annual 2020 by Richard G. Milner The Electron-Ion Collider he Fundamental Structure of Matter T Fundamental, curiosity-driven science is funded by developed societies in large part because it is one of the best investments in the future. For example, the study of the fundamental structure of matter over about two centuries underpins modern human civilization. There is a continual cycle of discovery, understanding and application leading to further discovery. The timescales can be long. For example, Maxwell’s equations developed in the mid-nineteenth century to describe simple electrical and magnetic laboratory experiments of that time are the basis for twenty-first century communications. Fundamental experiments by nuclear physicists in the mid-twentieth century to understand spin gave rise to the common medical diagnostic tool, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Quantum mechanics, developed about a century ago to describe atomic systems, now is viewed as having great potential for realizing more effective twenty-first century computers. mit physics annual 2020 milner ( 61 u c t g up quark charm quark top quark gluon d s b γ down quark strange quark bottom quark photon ve vμ vτ W electron neutrino muon neutrino tau neutrino W boson e μ τ Z electron muon tau Z boson Einstein H + Gravity Higgs boson figure 1 THE STANDARD MODEL (SM) , whose fundamental constituents are shown sche- Left: Schematic illustration [1] of the fundamental matically in Figure 1, represents an enormous intellectual human achievement.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Vector Boson Production Via Gluon-Gluon Fusion
    Multi-Vector Boson Production via Gluon-Gluon Fusion Pankaj Agrawal and Ambresh Shivaji Institute of Physics Sachivalaya Marg Bhubaneswar 751005, INDIA The data is being recorded at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) for quite some- time. All this data has produced only strong support for the standard model (SM). There does not seem to be any significant evidence for beyond the standard model (BSM) scenarios [1]. Various extensions of the standard model are getting seriously constrained. There also appear to be strong suggestions that the only missing piece of the SM, the Higgs boson exists. However, SM is unsatisfactory in a number of ways. One has to keep looking for any hint for the new physics signal. It would appear that to test the model and look for the directions for the extension, one may need to probe as many SM processes as possible. In particular, one would be looking for the processes that have many particles in the final state or have small cross sections. At the LHC and proposed hadron colliders such as HE-LHC, one of the features is large gluon luminosity. Therefore, some of the gg scattering processes, which occur at the one-loop level and have many particles in the final state, would be important and observable at the LHC. They can also contribute to the backgrounds to the BSM physics scenarios. We are interested in a particular set of processes pp → V V ′g/γX. Here V, V ′ = W,Z,γ. We are particularly interested in the contribution from the gluon-gluon scattering. Since W,Z,γ do not couple to the gluons directly, these processes take place at the one-loop.
    [Show full text]
  • ELEMENTARY PARTICLES in PHYSICS 1 Elementary Particles in Physics S
    ELEMENTARY PARTICLES IN PHYSICS 1 Elementary Particles in Physics S. Gasiorowicz and P. Langacker Elementary-particle physics deals with the fundamental constituents of mat- ter and their interactions. In the past several decades an enormous amount of experimental information has been accumulated, and many patterns and sys- tematic features have been observed. Highly successful mathematical theories of the electromagnetic, weak, and strong interactions have been devised and tested. These theories, which are collectively known as the standard model, are almost certainly the correct description of Nature, to first approximation, down to a distance scale 1/1000th the size of the atomic nucleus. There are also spec- ulative but encouraging developments in the attempt to unify these interactions into a simple underlying framework, and even to incorporate quantum gravity in a parameter-free “theory of everything.” In this article we shall attempt to highlight the ways in which information has been organized, and to sketch the outlines of the standard model and its possible extensions. Classification of Particles The particles that have been identified in high-energy experiments fall into dis- tinct classes. There are the leptons (see Electron, Leptons, Neutrino, Muonium), 1 all of which have spin 2 . They may be charged or neutral. The charged lep- tons have electromagnetic as well as weak interactions; the neutral ones only interact weakly. There are three well-defined lepton pairs, the electron (e−) and − the electron neutrino (νe), the muon (µ ) and the muon neutrino (νµ), and the (much heavier) charged lepton, the tau (τ), and its tau neutrino (ντ ). These particles all have antiparticles, in accordance with the predictions of relativistic quantum mechanics (see CPT Theorem).
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Physics at the Energy Frontier: Recent Heavy Ion Results from the Perspective of the Electron Ion Collider
    universe Article Nuclear Physics at the Energy Frontier: Recent Heavy Ion Results from the Perspective of the Electron Ion Collider Astrid Morreale 1,2 1 Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research, 75014 Paris, France; [email protected] or [email protected] 2 Center for Frontiers in Nuclear Science, Stony Brook, NY 11790, USA Received: 9 April 2019; Accepted: 24 April 2019; Published: 28 April 2019 Abstract: Quarks and gluons are the fundamental constituents of nucleons. Their interactions rather than their mass are responsible for 99% of the mass of all visible matter in the universe. Measuring the fundamental properties of matter has had a large impact on our understanding of the nucleon structure and it has given us decades of research and technological innovation. Despite the large number of discoveries made, many fundamental questions remain open and in need of a new and more precise generation of measurements. The future Electron Ion Collider (EIC) will be a machine dedicated to hadron structure research. It will study the content of protons and neutrons in a largely unexplored regime in which gluons are expected to dominate and eventually saturate. While the EIC will be the machine of choice to quantify this regime, recent surprising results from the heavy ion community have begun to exhibit similar signatures as those expected from a regime dominated by gluons. Many of the heavy ion results that will be discussed in this document highlight the kinematic limitations of hadron–hadron and hadron–nucleus collisions. The reliability of using as a reference proton–proton (pp) and proton–ion (pA) collisions to quantify and disentangle vacuum and Cold Nuclear Matter (CNM) effects from those proceeding from a Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP) may be under question.
    [Show full text]