CHRONICLE 03.Qxp
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fifth Progress Report on the Implementation of the Common Set of Proposals Endorsed by EU and NATO Councils on 6 December 2016 and 5 December 2017
Fifth progress report on the implementation of the common set of proposals endorsed by EU and NATO Councils on 6 December 2016 and 5 December 2017 16 June 2020 On 6 December 2016 and on 5 December 2017, EU and NATO Councils endorsed, in parallel processes, a common set of 74 proposals for the implementation of the Joint Declaration signed in Warsaw on 8 July 2016 by the President of the European Council, the President of the European Commission and the Secretary General of NATO. Responding to the taskings by the Ministers of both organizations, regular progress reports on implementation were submitted to the respective Councils in June and December 2017, in June 2018, as well as in June 2019. The present, fifth, report covers the period between June 2019 and June 2020. It elaborates on progress achieved in the implementation of the 74 common proposals by showcasing tangible deliverables in all areas of cooperation. In particular, the following elements can be highlighted: - Political dialogue has further intensified at all levels and settings, including in virtual formats, while maintaining the positive trend of mutual and reciprocal cross-briefings. It remains an essential and indispensable instrument for strengthening mutual understanding, building confidence and ensuring reciprocal transparency vis-à-vis the NATO Allies and the EU Member States, as well as their strong engagement. - The Structured Dialogue on military mobility at staff level continues to contribute to information sharing in the key areas of military requirements, transport infrastructure, transport of dangerous goods, customs and cross border movement permissions. - In the area of strategic communications, cooperation focused on strengthening mutual alerting on disinformation incidents and hostile information activities, as well as improving capacities related to detection, analysis and exposure to disinformation. -
Defence Forces Review 2020 Defence Forces Review 2020
Defence Forces Review 2020 Defence Forces Review 2020 ISSN 1649-7066 DISCLAIMER The material and views expressed in these papers are those of the authors, which have been subject to academic peer review, and do not indicate official approval of the Defence Forces or the Department of Defence. Published for the Military Authorities by the Public Relations Section at the Chief of Staff’s Branch, and printed at the Defence Forces Printing Press, Infirmary Road, Dublin 7. © Copyright in accordance with Section 56 of the Copyright Act, 1963, Section 7 of the University of Limerick Act, 1989 and Section 6 of the Dublin University Act, 1989. 1 Launch of the Defence Forces Review In conjunction with an Academic Seminar Dublin City University, 3rd December, 2020 Defence Forces Review 2020 Preface “Not all readers are leaders, but all leaders are readers.” (Harry Truman, US President 1945 – ‘53) Building on the success of last year’s Review, launch and positive reaction 2020’s Review is themed ‘The global island: Strategic implications for Irish defence planning in the evolving geopolitical landscape.’ This is a pertinent topic in light of the Defence Commission proposed in the 2020 Programme for Government, which is set to look at “the medium- and longer term defence requirements of the State…” The Defence Forces Review provides a forum in which contributors can present their research and facilitate discussion on a wide range of defence-related matters for the benefit of the wider Defence Community in Ireland and beyond. Sadly, due to Covid 19 restrictions we will be unable to have a normal launch of the Review. -
MEDALS of the IRISH DEFENCE FORCES MEDALS of the IRISH DEFENCE FORCES
Óglaigh na hÉireann MEDALS OF THE IRISH DEFENCE FORCES MEDALS OF THE IRISH DEFENCE FORCES 1st Edition (October 2010) CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE No. Irish Defence Forces Medals 7 - 26 UN Medals 27 - 67 EU Medals 69 - 80 UN Mandated Medals 81 - 90 War of Independence Medals 91 - 96 Wearing of Medals 97 - 105 Index 106 - 107 Acknowledgements and References 108 INTRODUCTION The award of medals for services rendered is generally associated with the military. Military medals are bestowed in recognition of specific acts or service which can vary in significance from routine duty to bravery and valour. Irrespective of their provenance, military medals are highly valued and are regarded as representing all that is best in the field of human endeavour. They are seen as being earned and merited by the recipient and in the Defence Forces this sense of worth is enhanced by the strict conditions attaching to the awards. Medals in the Defence Forces fall into two broad categories: medals awarded by the Minister for Defence on the recommendation of the Chief of Staff and medals awarded to qualifying personnel for service overseas on Government approved missions. The first category comprises the Military Medal for Gallantry and the Distinguished Service Medal, which can be awarded for acts of bravery, gallantry, courage, leadership or devotion to duty and the Military Star, a posthumous decoration awardable to personnel killed as a direct result of hostile action. These medals may only be awarded following rigorous investigation by a board of officers appointed by the Chief of Staff. Also in this category are the Service Medal, which recognises service in the Defence Forces for a minimum fixed period and the United Nations Peacekeepers Medal, which recognises service overseas with a UN mandated mission. -
Defence Forces Review 2018 Defence Forces Review 2018
Defence Forces Review 2018 Defence Forces Review 2018 ISSN 1649-7066 Published for the Military Authorities by the Public Relations Section at the Chief of Staff’s Branch, and printed at the Defence Forces Printing Press, Infirmary Road, Dublin 7. Amended and reissued - 29/01/2019 © Copyright in accordance with Section 56 of the Copyright Act, 1963, Section 7 of the University of Limerick Act, 1989 and Section 6 of the Dublin University Act, 1989. 1 PEACEKEEPING AND PEACE MAKING INTERVENTIONS Launch of the Defence Forces Review In conjunction with an Academic Seminar National University of Ireland, Galway 22nd November 2018 Defence Forces Review 2018 RÉAMHRÁ Is pribhléid dom, mar Oifigeach i bhfeighil ar Bhrainse Caidreamh Poiblí Óglaigh na hÉireann, a bheith páirteach i bhfoilsiú 'Athbhreithniú Óglaigh na hÉireann 2018’ . Mar ab ionann le foilseacháin sna blianta roimhe seo, féachtar san eagrán seo ábhar a chur ar fáil a bheidh ina acmhainn acadúil agus ina fhoinse plé i measc lucht léite 'Athbhreithniú'. Is téama cuí agus tráthúil an téama atá roghnaithe don eagrán seo - Coimeád na Síochána agus Idirghabhálacha d'fhonn Síocháin a dhéanamh,, mar go dtugtar aitheantas ann do chomóradh 60 bliain ó thug Óglaigh na hÉireann faoi oibríochtaí coimeádta síochána na Náisiún Aontaithe ar dtús chomh maith le comóradh 40 bliain ó imscaradh Óglaigh na hÉireann go UNIFIL den chéad uair. Ba mhaith liom aitheantas a thabhairt don Cheannfort Rory Finegan as an obair mhór a chuir sé isteach agus as a thiomantas chun foilseachán na bliana a chur ar fáil. Tugtar aitheantas freisin don obair thábhachtach agus chóir a rinne comheagarthóirí ‘Athbhreithniú’ . -
National University of Ireland St. Patrick's College, Maynooth THE
National University of Ireland St. Patrick’s College, M aynooth THE ROLE OF IRISH MILITARY INTELLIGENCE DURING WORLD WAR TWO by BRIAN D. MARTIN IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF M A DEPARTMENT OF MODERN HISTORY, ST. PATRICK’S COLLEGE. MAYNOOTH HEAD OF DEPARTMENT : Professor R.V. Comerford Supervisor of Research : Denise Dunne August, 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Acknowledgements ................................................................................ i Abbreviations ii Introduction 1 Chapter 1 Military Intelligence - An Overview......................... 7 Chapter 2 Combat intelligence . 14 Chapter 3 German Agents in Ireland...................................... 37 Chapter 4 G2 Co-operation with Allied Intelligence Services 58 Conclusion 76 Bibliography 80 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I owe a great debt of gratitude to the following people for their help, advice and support during the writing of this thesis. Firstly to the staff of the Dept, of Modern History, in St. Patrick’s College Maynooth. Especially my supervisor, Denise Dunne, for the time and advice she gave me during the year and also Professor RV Comerford for helping to point me in the right direction during the course of my research on many occasions. Further thanks to the following people, Comdt. Peter Young and Capt. Victor Lang, of the Military Archives for their help, advice and patience! Caroline Martin,for the same, as well as for the proofreading and typing of my interview notes. Richard Mossop, for his help with the wordprocessor everytime I did something wrong. Colin Menton for finding those texts when I was not able to. Dr. Eunan O’Halpin for his advice and help in the preliminary stages of this thesis. -
Service Lists for the Army, Navy and Air Force
SOCIAL SCIENCES COLLECTION GUIDES OFFICIAL PUBLICATIONS www.bl.uk/subjects/national-and-international-government-publications Service lists for the Army, Navy and Air Force INTRODUCTION This guide is the result of merging two separate checklists. The checklist of Army Lists (British Army lists 1642- : a chronological handlist) is undated and without attribution of authorship. It is believed to have been compiled around 1980 as a collaborative effort by the staff at that time of what was then the Official Publications Library (OPL) of the British Library; the identity of the actual compiler is unknown. The checklist of Navy Lists (Navy lists : a chronological handlist of lists of ships and officers of the Royal Navy since ca 1640) is better documented. It was compiled in 1986 by Joy Tilley, a graduate library trainee, as a project for her work experience training under the supervision of Richard Cheffins who edited the result. No attempt has been made to further edit the original checklists except to update a few pressmarks, to clarify some minor points of uncertainty, to expand somewhat on the current Army and Navy lists and to add a section on Air Force lists. The item numbering of Army Lists has been discontinued but otherwise the inconsistencies of style and layout between, and even within, the two main lists have been left to stand but these should not hinder the use of this guide. The original Navy checklist had a brief introduction which has been incorporated into this one; the Army checklist had none. Both had brief 'further reading' lists which have been combined as the penultimate section of this guide. -
THE MONTHLY AFRICA TERRORISM BULLETIN 1St– 29Th February 2020
AFRICAN UNION UNION AFRICAINE UNIÃO AFRICANA اﻻتحاداﻹفريقي ACSRT/CAERT African Centre for the Study and Research on Terrorism Centre Africain d’Etudes et de Recherche sur le Terrorisme THE MONTHLY AFRICA TERRORISM BULLETIN 1st– 29th February 2020 Edition No: 02 ABOUT AFRICA TERRORISM BULLETIN In line with its mandate to assist African Union (AU) Member States, Regional Economic Communities (RECs) and Regional Mechanisms (RMs) to build their Counter-Terrorism capacities and to prevent Violent Extremism, the African Centre for the Study and Research on Terrorism (ACSRT) has developed tools that enable it to collect, analyse, process and disseminate information on terrorism-related incidents occurring in Africa. One of the products of this effort is the monthly Africa Terrorism Bulletin (ATB) that is published by the Centre. The ATB seeks to keep AU Member State Policymakers, Researchers, Practitioners and other stakeholders in the fields of Counter-Terrorism (CT) and the Prevention and Countering Violent Extremism (P/CVE), updated fortnightly, on the trends of terrorism on the Continent. Notwithstanding the lack of a universally accepted common definition of Terrorism, the AU, in its 1999 OAU CONVENTION ONTHE PREVENTION AND COMBATING OF TERRORISM, Article 1 paragraph 3, (a) and (b), and Article 3, defines what constitutes a Terrorist Act. The ACSRT and therefore the ATB defer to this definition. © African Centre for the Study and Research on Terrorism (ACSRT) 2020. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without full attribution. -
Joint Task Force East and Shared Military Basing in Romania and Bulgaria
Occasional Paper Series STUDIES SECURITY MARSHALL FOR C. CENTER Joint Task Force East and Shared Military Basing in Romania and Bulgaria By Dorinel Moldovan, Plamen Pantev, and Matthew Rhodes GEORGE EUROPEAN No. 21 August 2009 ISSN 1863-6020 The George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies The George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies is a leading transatlantic defense educational and security studies institution. It is bilaterally supported by the U.S. and German governments and dedicated to the creation of a more stable security environment by advancing democratic defense institutions and relationships; promoting active, peaceful engagement; and enhancing enduring partnerships among the nations of North America, Europe, and Eurasia. The Marshall Center Occasional Paper Series The Marshall Center Occasional Paper Series seeks to further the legacy of the Center's namesake, General George C. Marshall, by disseminating scholarly essays that contribute to his ideal of ensuring that Europe and Eurasia are democratic, free, undivided, and at peace. Papers selected for this series are meant to identify, discuss, and influence current defense related security issues. The Marshall Center Occasional Paper Series focus is on comparative and interdisciplinary topics, including international security and democratic defense management, civil-military relations, strategy formulation, terrorism studies, defense planning, arms control, peacekeeping, crisis management, regional and cooperative security. The Marshall Center Occasional Papers are written by Marshall Center faculty and staff, Marshall Center alumni, or by individual, invited contributors, and are disseminated online and in a paper version. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the George C. -
German Exploitation of Irish Neutrality, 1939-1945
University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1967 German exploitation of Irish neutrality, 1939-1945 Bruce McGowan The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation McGowan, Bruce, "German exploitation of Irish neutrality, 1939-1945" (1967). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 2443. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/2443 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GERMAN EXPLOITATION OF IRISH NEUTRALITY 1939 - 1945 By Bruce J, McGowan B. A, University of Montana, I965 Presented In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Montana 1967 Approved by : TAJ,,d T, Chairman, Board of Examiners , -J Deanr7 Graduate School Date UMI Number; EP34251 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent on the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI UMI EP34251 Copyright 2012 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. -
THE DEFENCE FORCES MAGAZINE (ESTABLISHED 1940) OCT-NOV 2007 €2.50 (Stg £1.70)
00-An Cos-OCT-07 (p1-11) 23/11/2007 14:47 Page 1 THE DEFENCE FORCES MAGAZINE (ESTABLISHED 1940) OCT-NOV 2007 €2.50 (Stg £1.70) Bosnia p.13 PDFORRA p.22 Book Review p.29 ISSN 0010-9460 0 8 9 770010 946001 00-An Cos-OCT-07 (p1-11) 23/11/2007 14:47 Page 2 00-An Cos-OCT-07 (p1-11) 29/11/2007 15:16 Page 3 An Cosantóir VOLUME 67 Number 8 Oct-Nov 2007 MANAGER: News Update 2007 10K Capt Pádraic Kennedy Picture Parade. 4 Results 2 0 Another successful day EDITOR: at the races! Sgt David Nagle Report by Sgt David Nagle JOURNALIST: Terry McLaughlin Wesley Bourke EUFOR – Rebuilding EUFOR – ‘Weeds CONNECT: Bosnia 7 of Death’ 2 2 Sgt Willie Braine Defence Forces personnel play a Defence Forces use their vital role with EUFOR in Bosnia. expertise in de-mining PHOTOGRAPHER: Report by Bosnia. Armn Billy Galligan Wesley Bourke Report by Wesley Bourke SUBSCRIPTIONS: Sgt Rena Kennedy EUFOR – The On Exhibit Profile of Mid-Shipman ADVERTISING: Irish in Butmir 8 2 5 Charles Lucas VC. Killelan Marketing Ltd Senior Irish Soldiers hold Report by Mobile: 086 3842946 key appointments in HQ Col JAV Mortell (Retd) Tel: 01 8042691 EUFOR at Camp Butmir. Email: [email protected] Report by Wesley Bourke Printed by Kilkenny People, OSCE Moving Forward Mission profile in brief. Kilkenny. 1 2 The 2007 PDFORRA 2 6 Report by Conference. The fact that an article Sgt David Nagle Report by appears in this magazine does Sgt David Nagle not indicate official approval of the views expressed by the author. -
By KFOR Multinational Specialized Unit
[Commentary] NNeeww DDeeppuuttyy CCOOMMKKFFOORR My first appointment in KOSOVO goes back three years. I was at this time the Multinational Brigade North Commander. Back here as KFOR Deputy Commander, I have to admit that KOSOVO changed in almost all aspects. It is encouraging in a certain way. The measurement of the progresses realized as well for International Community than KFOR and KOSOVO is easy to make. This shows us that we are right to be proud and happy to serve in the KFOR Team. But, the difficulty to be confronted in the future will be the upholding of an ideal safe and secure environment in order to permit, all the people of KOSOVO to go surely toward its goal. Our part of the work against this challenge is considerably depending on our ability to anticipate and if possible prevent the expectable, that is to say the most likely as well as the less likely, events. For the HQ KFOR, this has a name: planning, as far as foreseeable. For the Units, this has as consequence to stay determined and firm, while adapting with professionalism the profile to the local and current situation. The next months will see also changes in KFOR specifically with the departure of Lieutenant General de Marnhac and the arrival of a brand new Command team which will have to take in account an expected very sensitive time. Thus, as part of future successes, this is our role also, the whole HQ, to facilitate the beginning of the new command group teambuilding. As Deputy Commander, let me tell you again my pride to be committed in such a mission within a highly qualified and very friendly team. -
The Irish Army Reserve in the Single Force Concept
The Journal of Military History and Defence Studies Vol 1. Issue 1. (January 2020) Conceptually Ambitious, Hardly Novel, and Currently Failing: The Irish Army Reserve in the Single Force Concept. Jonathan Carroll In 2013 the Irish Defence Forces went under significant reorganisation. Part of this organisation entailed integrating the Irish Army Reserve into the Defence Forces, as part of the ‘Single Force Concept’. Ostensibly, the Single Force Concept sought to provide a more reliable, fit for purpose, reserve force. However, this article argues that the concept has failed and that the Army Reserve is almost unusable. The article evaluates each service corps and provides an analysis of Reserve capabilities. This shows that the training of the force is suboptimal for augmenting the regular army in an emergency, and that a gap exists between what government policy wants the Reserve to do, and what it is actually capable of doing. This has resulted in an unusable reserve force with questionable utility. This article also highlights the difficulty of establishing the qualitative strength of the Army Reserve in the absence of appropriate means of defining what is meant by an ‘effective’ reservist, and explores the detrimental consequences of paltry financial investment in sustaining, developing, or enabling the Reserve as an effective force. It argues that the Single Force Concept has failed because it did not remedy the fundamental pre-existing flaws that plagued the various iterations of the Irish reserve land component prior to 2013, nor did it attempt to bring the Army Reserve into line with international best practice regarding reserve forces.