Report to the Secretary of State for Transport and The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report to the Secretary of State for Transport and The Report to the Secretary of State for Transport and the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government by J P Watson BSc FCIHT MICE MCMI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Transport and the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Date: 15 July 2011 TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 ACQUISITION OF LAND ACT 1981 THE CHILTERN RAILWAYS (BICESTER TO OXFORD IMPROVEMENTS) ORDER 201[X] REQUEST FOR A DIRECTION UNDER SECTION 90(2A) OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 APPLICATION FOR AN EXCHANGE LAND CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTIONS 19 AND 28 OF THE ACQUISITION OF LAND ACT 1981 Dates of Inquiry: 2 November 2010 to 28 January 2011 Ref: TWA/10/APP/01 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Case Details 1 1 Preamble 1 2 Description Of The Site And Its Surroundings 3 3 Procedural Matters 6 3.1 Costs Application 6 3.2 Planning Policy 6 3.3 Applications for Adjournment 6 3.4 Document CRCL/INQ/1/1 10 3.5 Statutory Undertaker’s Land: British Waterways 10 Board 3.6 Creation of Brookfurlong Crossing 11 3.7 Common Land at Port Meadow 12 3.8 Mansmoor Road, Otmoor 14 3.9 Document Obj 185/3 14 3.10 The Eligibility of Buildings For Noise Insulation 15 3.11 Human Rights 15 4 The Case For Chiltern Railways 15 4.1 Regulatory and Contractual Framework 16 4.2 Transport 19 4.3 East West Rail 26 4.4 Demand Forecasts and Economic Appraisal 29 4.5 Engineering 36 4.6 Level Crossings 46 4.7 Road Transport Impacts and Management 49 4.8 Noise and Vibration 57 4.9 Terrestrial Ecology 67 4.10 Land and Property 74 4.11 Planning and Environment 74 5 The Cases For The Supporters 101 5.1 Railfuture (Supp 14) 101 5.2 Lord Bradshaw (Supp 16) 102 5.3 Bicester Vision (Supp 25) 102 5.4 First Great Western (Supp 20) 102 5.5 Rail Freight Group and Lord Berkeley (Supps 38 102 and 15) 5.6 Dame Fiona Caldicott (Supp 34) 103 5.7 Network Rail (Supp 41) 104 5.8 Oxford United Football Club Ltd (Supp 32) 104 5.9 Aylesbury Vale Advantage (Supp 39) 104 5.10 Additional Matters In Support Of The Scheme 104 Raised In Written Representations 6 The Cases For The Objectors 6.1 The Trap Ground Allotment Association (Obj 13) 105 6.2 Mr Jonathan Clark (Obj 236) 108 6.3 Ms Hoonie Feltham (Obj 317) 109 6.4 Mr Ian Salisbury (Obj 5) 110 6.5 Councillor Jean Fooks (Rep 7) 114 6.6 Mr Edward Surridge (Obj 315) 114 6.7 Mr Peter Claye (Obj 255) 115 6.8 Drs Michael Drolet and Rosalind Thomas (Obj 9) 115 6.9 Engage Oxford (Obj 297) 116 6.10 Mr J C Thorowgood and Ms H M F Chance (Obj 77) 118 6.11 Quadrangle Management Limited (Obj 14) 118 6.12 Ms Nicola Blackwood MP (Obj 312) 120 6.13 Dr & Mrs Stephen Young (Obj 95) 121 6.14 Ms Sushila Dhall (Obj 235) 122 6.15 Harry and Reneth Schoetz (Obj 232) 122 6.16 Dr Rob Hope (Obj 179) 123 6.17 Councillor Michael Gotch (Obj 61) 123 6.18 Ms Maureen Rosenberg (Obj 143) 124 6.19 Professor Alexander M Korsunsky (Obj 295) 124 6.20 Dr Caroline Robertson (Obj 234) 127 6.21 Sir Muir and Lady Jackie Gray (Obj 149) 133 6.22 Mr Glyn Taylor (Obj 132) 135 6.23 Islip Parish Council (Obj 294) 136 6.24 James and Lucy de Jonge (Objs 50 and 93) 137 6.25 Ann and Jon Conibear (Obj 91) 137 6.26 Mr and Mrs J Delafield (Obj 75) 138 6.27 Mr Michael Graham and Ms Amanda Roberts (Obj 138 39) 6.28 The Ramblers’ Association (Obj 41) 139 6.29 Oxford Fieldpaths Society (Obj 55) 140 6.30 Charlton-on-Otmoor Parish Council (Rep 9) 142 6.31 Mr K A Hayward (Obj 1) 142 6.32 The Trustees of A Deeley and the Trustees of I H G 143 Calcutt (Obj 194) 6.33 Topbreed Limited and Primepark Limited (Objs 189 144 and 190) 6.34 Catherine and Bartholomew Quinn (Obj 230) 147 6.35 The Owner and Residents of Merton Grounds Farm 148 (Obj 191) 6.36 Mr and Mrs Offord and Mr and Mrs Bradshaw (Obj 151 238) 6.37 Brian and Pheobe Davies (Obj 111) 155 6.38 Mrs Greta Walker (Obj 7) 156 6.39 Mr Alistair Buckley (Obj 245) 158 6.40 The Oxford Green Belt Network (Obj 122) 159 6.41 Campaign to Protect Rural England Oxfordshire 161 (Obj 195) 6.42 Paul and Denise West (Obj 12) 163 6.43 Mrs Rosemary Harris (Obj 213) 163 6.44 Wendlebury Parish Council (Obj 286) 166 6.45 Bus Users UK Oxford Group (Obj 205) 166 6.46 Cyclists’ Touring Club (Rep 12) 168 6.47 Mr Jesse Benjamin Honour, Mrs Margaret Honour 168 and Mr Jesse Scott Honour (Objs 44, 45 and 46) 6.48 The Freemen Of Oxford (Obj 314) 169 6.49 The Wolvercote Commoners’ Committee (Obj 321) 170 6.50 Grundon Waste Management Limited (Obj 102) 170 6.51 The Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire 173 Wildlife Trust (Obj 211) 6.52 Mr A Basson and Leda Properties Limited (Objs 51 176 and 52) 6.53 Mr Paul Withrington (Obj 319) 178 6.54 Mr Sean Feeney (Obj 123) 182 6.55 Additional Matters Raised In Objections Made By 184 Written Representations Merton College 184 Exeter College 184 Mr Robert Barbour 184 Scottish & Southern Energy plc 184 Freightliner 184 Southern Gas Networks plc 185 Ms B Forrow 185 The Fitness Company 185 Mr G Hill and others 185 Gosford and Water Eaton Parish Council 185 Dr Ian East 185 Birch Sites Limited 186 Thames Water Utilities Limited 186 Dr R B Parekh 186 Ms D M North 186 Professor John Howson 186 Mr J M Henman 186 Mr P M Napier 186 Mr D R Davies 186 Hanson Quarry Products Europe Limited 187 Mark Richardson and David Richardson 188 Oxford City Council 188 Mrs E Henebury 189 Plumbase Limited 189 Oxfordshire County Council 189 Dr Rob Hope 191 Mr and Mrs Honour 191 Mr and Mrs E Williams 192 British Waterways Board 192 Mr and Mrs Unwin 193 Mr B Henman 194 Mr P Miller 194 Mr T Howard 196 Natural England 197 The Environment Agency 200 The Norman Trust and others 200 Mr D van Wijngaarden 201 Defence Estates 201 Cherwell District Council 202 D B Schenker Rail (UK) Limited 202 SS Philip and James’ School 202 Peter and Carol Jarvis 203 The Friends of the Trap Grounds 203 7 Other Representations Bicester Town Council 203 8 The Response Of Chiltern Railways 8.1 Need For The Scheme 203 8.2 Access to Trap Grounds Allotments 205 8.3 Noise and Vibration 209 8.4 Air Quality and Human Health 216 8.5 The Business Case 217 8.6 Safety 220 8.7 Human Rights 220 8.8 Suggested Modifications To The Railway Proposal 221 8.9 Road Traffic Implications of the Scheme 221 8.10 Mill Lane, Islip and Work No. 16 224 8.11 Ecological Effects 225 8.12 Mansmoor Road and Work No. 13 235 8.13 Langford Lane and Work No. 11 237 8.14 Other Crossings – Footpaths, Bridleways and 240 Private Accesses 8.15 Trains and Horses 243 8.16 Land at London Road, Bicester, and Land at 246 Langford Park Farm 8.17 Land At Gavray Drive, Bicester 247 8.18 Effects During Construction 249 8.19 Development Proposals At Water Eaton 250 8.20 Green Belt 255 8.21 Responses To Other Matters Raised In Objections 255 8.22 Proposed Modifications to the Draft Order 256 8.23 Proposed Modifications to the Book of Reference 257 8.24 Proposed Modifications to the Deposited Plans and 258 Sections 8.25 Proposed Modifications to the Planning Direction 259 Drawings 8.26 Modification to the Application for an Open Space 259 Certificate 8.27 Other Proposed Modifications to the Draft Order, 260 Deposited Plans and Sections, Planning Direction Drawings and Book of Reference 9 Conclusions 9.1 General Matters 261 9.2 Aims, Objectives And Need 262 9.3 Justification 265 9.4 Alternatives Considered 267 9.5 Funding 270 9.6 Order Modifications 272 9.7 Impacts On The Rights Of Way Network 273 Construction Effects on Road Traffic 273 Operational Effects on Road Traffic 274 Public Rights of Way and Level Crossing Closures 276 9.8 Impacts on Residents, Business and the 284 Environment Noise and Vibration 285 Air Quality 291 Water Resources and the Risk Of Flooding 297 Landscape and Visual Amenity 297 Cultural Heritage and Archaeological Remains 300 Land Use, Commercial Property and Agriculture 301 Open Space 307 9.9 Flora And Fauna 310 Protected Species 310 Nationally and Locally Designated Habitat 314 9.10 The Oxford Meadows SAC 315 9.11 Mitigation Measures 321 Code of Construction Practice 321 Mitigation Measures Proposed In The Design And 322 Access Statement Proposed Mitigation: Public Rights of Way: Section 322 5(6) of the Act Proposed Mitigation of Major or Significant 322 Environmental Impacts Adverse Environmental Impacts Remaining After 324 Mitigation 9.12 Environmental Statement 325 9.13 Issues Not Included In The Statement Of Matters 328 East West Rail 328 Defence Estates 328 Utility Companies 328 Bus Services 328 Railway Safety 329 Public Health 329 Freight Access 329 Wendlebury Gate Stables 329 College Farm, Wendlebury 330 Access to Trap Ground Allotments 331 Car Parking at Aristotle Lane 334 Trap Grounds Town Green 334 9.14 Green Belt 334 9.15 Consistency With National And Local Policies 338 9.16 Proposed Planning Conditions 341 9.17 The Case For Compulsory Purchase 341 9.18 Conclusion On The Draft Order 345 9.19 Conclusion On The Exchange Land Certificate 346 9.20 Conclusion on the Grant of Deemed Planning 347 Permission 10 Recommendations 347 Appendices 1 Recommended Planning Conditions 348 REPORT TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT AND FILE REF: TWA/10/APP/01 THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT CASE DETAILS 1 Purpose The Order would enable The Chiltern Railway Company Limited to carry out works to the railway between Oxford and Bicester, and construct a new length of railway to connect the Oxford-Bicester line to the Bicester- London line so as to enable through trains to run from Oxford station to London (Marylebone) station.
Recommended publications
  • NR05 Oxford TWAO
    OFFICIAL Rule 10(2)(d) Transport and Works Act 1992 The Transport and Works (Applications and Objections Procedure) (England and Wales) Rules 2006 Network Rail (Oxford Station Phase 2 Improvements (Land Only)) Order 202X Report summarising consultations undertaken 1 Introduction 1.1 Network Rail Infrastructure Limited ('Network Rail') is making an application to the Secretary of State for Transport for an order under the Transport and Works Act 1992. The proposed order is termed the Network Rail (Oxford Station Phase 2 Improvements (Land Only)) Order ('the Order'). 1.2 The purpose of the Order is to facilitate improved capacity and capability on the “Oxford Corridor” (Didcot North Junction to Aynho Junction) to meet the Strategic Business Plan objections for capacity enhancement and journey time improvements. As well as enhancements to rail infrastructure, improvements to highways are being undertaken as part of the works. Together, these form part of Oxford Station Phase 2 Improvements ('the Project'). 1.3 The Project forms part of a package of rail enhancement schemes which deliver significant economic and strategic benefits to the wider Oxford area and the country. The enhanced infrastructure in the Oxford area will provide benefits for both freight and passenger services, as well as enable further schemes in this strategically important rail corridor including the introduction of East West Rail services in 2024. 1.4 The works comprised in the Project can be summarised as follows: • Creation of a new ‘through platform’ with improved passenger facilities. • A new station entrance on the western side of the railway. • Replacement of Botley Road Bridge with improvements to the highway, cycle and footways.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Infrastructure Delivery Plan 2019
    Contents Context of IDP Update 2019 (01/04/2018 – 31/03/2019) ....................................................... 2 Section 1 – Infrastructure Delivery Plan Update, December 2019 Summary Tables ............. 3 1.1 IDP Update Bicester Projects .................................................................................. 4 1.2 IDP Update Banbury Projects ................................................................................. 8 1.3 IDP Update Kidlington and Rural Areas Projects .................................................. 10 Section 2 – Infrastructure Delivery Plan Update, December 2019 ....................................... 14 2.1 IDP Update Bicester Projects .................................................................................... 15 2.2 IDP Update Banbury Projects .................................................................................... 37 2.3 IDP Update Kidlington and Rural Areas Projects ....................................................... 55 1 Context of IDP Update 2019 (01/04/2018 – 31/03/2019) Infrastructure is an essential part of sustainable development supporting increased housing provision and economic growth, mitigating against climate change and facilitating improved quality of life within communities. The Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) contains the infrastructure required to support Cherwell Local Plan Part 1 adopted in July 2015 and it is set out in Appendix 8 of the Plan. The IDP is a live document adjusted overtime to reflect changes in circumstance and strategies alongside
    [Show full text]
  • Quality As a Space to Spend Time Proximity and Quality of Alternatives Active Travel Networks Heritage Concluaiona Site No. Site
    Quality as a space to spend Proximity and quality of Active travel networks Heritage Concluaiona time alternatives GI network (More than 1 of: Activities for different ages/interests Where do spaces currently good level of public use/value, Within such as suitability for informal sports and play/ provide key walking/cycling links? Biodiversity, cta, sports, Public Access Visual interest such as variety and colour Number of other facilities Which sites do or Agricultural Active Travel Networks curtilage/a Historic Local Landscape value variety of routes/ walking routes Level of anti-social behaviour (Public rights of way SSS Conservation Ancient OC Flood Zone In view allotments, significant visual Individual GI Site No. Site Name (Unrestricted, Description of planting, surface textures, mix of green Level of use within a certain distance that could best provide Land SAC LNR LWS (Directly adjacent or djoining In CA? park/garde Heritage Landscape Type of open space in Local Value Further Details/ Sensitivity to Change Summary Opportunities /presence, quality and usage of play and perceptions of safety National Cycle Network I Target Areas Woodlands WS (Worst) cone? interest or townscape protections Limited, Restricted) and blue assets, presence of public art perform the same function alternatives, if any Classification containing a network) listed n Assets this area equipment/ Important local connections importance, significant area of building? presence of interactive public art within Oxford) high flood risk (flood zone 3)) Below ground Above ground archaeology archaeology Areas of current and former farmland surrounded by major roads and edge of city developments, such as hotels, garages and Yes - contains two cycle Various areas of National Cycle Routes 5 and 51 Loss of vegetation to development and Northern Gateway a park and ride.
    [Show full text]
  • WIN a ONE NIGHT STAY at the OXFORD MALMAISON | OXFORDSHIRE THAMES PATH | FAMILY FUN Always More to Discover
    WIN A ONE NIGHT STAY AT THE OXFORD MALMAISON | OXFORDSHIRE THAMES PATH | FAMILY FUN Always more to discover Tours & Exhibitions | Events | Afternoon Tea Birthplace of Sir Winston Churchill | World Heritage Site BUY ONE DAY, GET 12 MONTHS FREE ATerms precious and conditions apply.time, every time. Britain’sA precious time,Greatest every time.Palace. Britain’s Greatest Palace. www.blenheimpalace.com Contents 4 Oxford by the Locals Get an insight into Oxford from its locals. 8 72 Hours in the Cotswolds The perfect destination for a long weekend away. 12 The Oxfordshire Thames Path Take a walk along the Thames Path and enjoy the most striking riverside scenery in the county. 16 Film & TV Links Find out which famous films and television shows were filmed around the county. 19 Literary Links From Alice in Wonderland to Lord of the Rings, browse literary offerings and connections that Oxfordshire has created. 20 Cherwell the Impressive North See what North Oxfordshire has to offer visitors. 23 Traditions Time your visit to the county to experience at least one of these traditions! 24 Transport Train, coach, bus and airport information. 27 Food and Drink Our top picks of eateries in the county. 29 Shopping Shopping hotspots from around the county. 30 Family Fun Farm parks & wildlife, museums and family tours. 34 Country Houses and Gardens Explore the stories behind the people from country houses and gardens in Oxfordshire. 38 What’s On See what’s on in the county for 2017. 41 Accommodation, Tours Broughton Castle and Attraction Listings Welcome to Oxfordshire Connect with Experience Oxfordshire From the ancient University of Oxford to the rolling hills of the Cotswolds, there is so much rich history and culture for you to explore.
    [Show full text]
  • Milestones & Waymarkers
    MILESTONES & WAYMARKERS The Journal of the Milestone Society incorporating On the Ground Volume Seven 2014 ISSN. 1479-5167 FREE TO MEMBERS OF THE MILESTONE SOCIETY MILESTONES & WAYMARKERS incorporating On the Ground Volume Seven 2014 MILESTONES & WAYMARKERS The Journal of the Milestone Society incorporating On the Ground Volume Seven 2014 The Milestone Society—Registered Charity No 1105688 ISSN 1479-5167 PRODUCTION TEAM John V Nicholls, 220 Woodland Avenue, Hutton, BRENTWOOD, Essex, CM13 1DA Email: [email protected] Supported by the Editorial Panel of Carol Haines, Mike Hallett, Keith Lawrence and David Viner MAIN CONTENTS INTRODUCTION This latest issue of one of the Society’s two principal Emergency Powers and the Milestones 3 publications in print marks ten years of publishing this A Cheshire milepost 6 Journal, now firmly established as an annual publication It happened at the milestone 7 and permanent place of record, especially as since 2011 The A34 – A Tribute to Ogilby? 11 it has incorporated the valuable On The Ground section, From the Archives previously published separately. Lost mileposts of the Middx & Essex Turnpike 12 Its seven issues between 2004 and 2010 together On the Ground 13 with seven issues of Milestones & Waymarkers since Scotland 2004 represents a significant archive, especially when 20 taken together with the Society’s six-monthly Newslet- ‘Crossing the Pennines’ Heritage Trail 21 ter, which by the turn of 2014/15 will have published 28 Milestones from Overseas issues since the very early days of the Society in 2001. Sri Lanka, Malta, New Zealand 22 Much has changed over that period, not least the Book Review: Moving Miles 26 growing use of the website to share new information and The Roehampton Mounting Block and ‘Milestone’ 27 increasingly to record activities.
    [Show full text]
  • M3 Junction 9 Improvement Scheme PCF Stage 2 – Report on Public Consultation
    M3 Junction 9 Improvement Scheme PCF Stage 2 – Report on Public Consultation March 2018 Registered office Bridge House, 1 Walnut Tree Close, Guildford, GU1 4LZ Highways England Company Limited registered in England and Wales number 09346363 M3 Junction 9 Improvement Scheme PCF Stage 2 – Report on Public Consultation M3 JUNCTION 9 IMPROVEMENT SCHEME PCF STAGE 2 (OPTION SELECTION) REPORT ON PUBLIC CONSULTATION Highways England Date: March 2018 Project no: 70015218 HE PIN: 551511 Prepared for: Highways England Bridge House Walnut Tree Close Guildford Surrey GU1 4LZ Mountbatten House Basing View Basingstoke RG21 4HJ Hampshire United Kingdom Tel: +44-(0) 1256 318800 www.wsp.com ii M3 Junction 9 Improvement Scheme PCF Stage 2 – Report on Public Consultation QUALITY MANAGEMENT ISSUE/REVISION FIRST ISSUE REVISION 1 REVISION 2 REVISION 3 SUITABILITY Remarks P01 Date March 2018 Carole Lehman / Prepared by Adam Webb Signature Checked by Duncan Brooks Signature Authorised by Pradeep Agrawal Signature PIN: HE551511 Project number WSP ref: 70015218 Report number HE551511-WSP-GEN-M3J9PCF2-RP-TR-00048 iii M3 Junction 9 Improvement Scheme PCF Stage 2 – Report on Public Consultation PRODUCTION TEAM CLIENT (HIGHWAYS ENGLAND) Major Projects Programme Lead Steve Hoesli Major Projects Senior Project Neil Andrew Manager Major Projects Project Manager Simon Hewett Senior User Representative Paul Benham WSP Tel: +44 (0)1684 851 751 RIS Area 3 Programme Director Steve O’Donnell RIS Area 3 Programme Manager Stuart Craig Tel: +44 (0)1256 318 660 Project Director Roland Diffey Tel: +44 (0)1256 318 777 Project Manager Pradeep Agrawal Tel: +44 (0)2031 169 090 iv M3 Junction 9 Improvement Scheme PCF Stage 2 – Report on Public Consultation TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................9 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Shropshire and Telford & Wrekin
    Interactive PDF Document Look for the pointer symbol for document links. • The Contents page has links to the relevant items. • The titles on the Chapters, Plans and Tables all link back to the Contents page. • Further interactive links are provided to aid your navigation through this document. Shropshire,Telford & Wrekin Minerals Local Plan 1996 - 2006 Adopted Plan April 2000 SHROPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL AND TELFORD & WREKIN COUNCIL SHROPSHIRE, TELFORD & WREKIN Minerals Local Plan 1996 to 2006 (Adopted Plan - April 2000) Carolyn Downs Sheila Healy Corporate Director: Corporate Director: Community & Environment Services Environment & Economy Community & Environment Services Environment & Economy Shropshire County Council Telford & Wrekin Council The Shirehall, Abbey Foregate Civic Offices, PO Box 212 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Telford, Shropshire SY2 6ND TF3 4LB If you wish to discuss the Plan, please contact Adrian Cooper on (01743) 252568 or David Coxill on (01952) 202188 Alternatively, fax your message on 01743 - 252505 or 01952 - 291692 i. Shropshire,Telford & Wrekin Minerals Local Plan 1996 - 2006 Adopted Plan April 2000 access to information... This Plan can be made available on request in large print, Braille or audio cassette. It may take us some days to prepare a copy of the document in these formats. If you would like a copy of the Plan in one of the above formats, please contact Adrian Cooper on (01743) 252568, or write to: Community & Environment Services Shropshire County Council The Shirehall Abbey Foregate Shrewsbury SY2 6ND You can fax us on (01743) 252505. You can contact us by e-mail on: [email protected] This Plan is also available on our websites at: http:/shropshire-cc.gov.uk/ and: http:/telford.gov.uk/ ii.
    [Show full text]
  • New Marston Primary School Newsletter 27.11.20 Through a Rich
    New Marston Primary School Newsletter 27.11.20 Through a rich, challenging and ambitious curriculum, we prepare our children to contribute actively and positively to their wider world. We help them to aim higher, reach further and shine brighter. Learning in school School lunches Key Stage 1 have started practising their Christmas play. It will look a little Please note the vegetarian sausage roll will change to a cheese pinwheel different this year, but the staff are very excited and channelling their on Monday of week 2. creative skills! It’s lovely to see such confidence and enthusiasm in the children. Safeguarding message Transition feedback Sadly there is another video circulating on social media (TikTok) which has Parents in our current Reception, Year One and Year Three classes have some very disturbing images. The video is named ‘Megan is missing’ and is been sent a short survey to complete regarding their child's transition from based on a film which is banned in many countries. Please be cautious if their previous year group to their current one. This will help us to evaluate your child is using the internet. May we remind you that TikTok is not and develop our transition procedures and make them even better. I would suitable for children aged under 13 and most social media sites have an be very grateful if you could complete the survey by 11.12.20 age limit which is 13 or above. Shoebox appeal This year we are running a shoebox appeal for a local charity. ‘Children Christmas cards Heard and Seen’ is an Oxford based charity which support children with a We are able to have Christmas cards brought parent in prison.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Today for Nature Tomorrow
    A review of the ecology, hydrology and nutrient dynamics of floodplain meadows in England No. 446 - English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 446 A review of the ecology, hydrology and nutrient dynamics of floodplain meadows in England David J.G. Gowing1, Jerry R.B. Tallowin2, Nancy B. Dise1, Joanne Goodyear2, Mike E. Dodd1 and Rebecca J Lodge1. 1Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA 2Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2002 Contents Executive summary 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 13 1.1 Scope of the review..................................................................................................... 13 1.2 Review methodology................................................................................................... 13 1.3 Current distribution of Floodplain meadows in England............................................ 14 1.4 Perceived threats to the habitat.................................................................................... 15 2. Hydrology of floodplain meadows.............................................................................. 20 2.1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Port Meadow and Wolvercote Common and Picksey Mead, and Why Their Plant Communities Changed Over the Last 90 Years A
    A brief history of Port Meadow and Wolvercote Common and Picksey Mead, and why their plant communities changed over the last 90 years A. W McDonald Summary A multidisciplinary approach to landscape history enabled the examination of botanical, hydrological and agricultural data spanning some 4,000 years. The results showed Bronze Age humans affecting the vegetation by pasturing cattle on the floodplain extending from Yarnton to Oxford. In the Iron Age pastoralists were over-grazing Port Meadow and, between the sixth and ninth centuries, part of the floodplain was set aside for a hay crop whilst the aftermath or second grass crop continued to be shared as pasture. By Domesday floodplain meads were the most expensive land recorded in this survey and Port Meadow was established as common land belonging to Oxford. Having discussed the soil and water conditions on the floodplain and its potential effect on the plant communities, the management history of Port Meadow with Wolvercote Common is followed by that of Picksey Mead. Finally, the plant communities are discussed. Those established in 1981/2 are compared with data sets for the early 1920s and for 1996-2006. Changes in the species composition between sites are due to different management regimes and those over time and within sites are attributed to changes in the water-table. Introduction The Oxford grassland comprises common pasture and mead situated on alluvium over limestone gravel. It is unusual for its four thousand years of management history and evidence for the effect this has had on the vegetation. Sited in the upper Thames valley, within three miles of Oxford City centre, Port Meadow (325 acres/132 ha) and Wolvercote Common (75 acres/30.4 ha) (Figure 1 and Figure 2) are known locally as the Meadow, even though they are pasture1.
    [Show full text]
  • An Improved Backcalculation Method to Predict Flexible
    AN IMPROVED BACKCALCULATION METHOD TO PREDICT FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT LAYERS MODULI AND BONDING CONDITION BETWEEN WEARING COURSE AND BASE COURSE by BACHAR AL HAKIM BSc, MSc, MASCE, MIHT A thesis submitted to Liverpool John Moores University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Liverpool John Moores University School of the Built Environment Liverpool United Kingdom. April 1997. This thesis is dedicated to the souls of my mum and my twin brother, whom I lost during this research period. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his sincere appreciation to Dr H. Al-Nageim, Professor L. Lesley and Mr D. Morley under whose supervision this research project was conducted. Sincere thanks are due to Dr D. Pountney for his advice concerning the mathematical, statistical and computer works. A special thank is also extended to Professor D. Jagger, the School Deputy Director for Research and Developments for his help and support. The author acknowledges the co-operation of Cheshire County Council for permission of access to the A34 road pavements, University of Ulster for the Nottingham Asphalt Tester provision and SWK Pavement Engineering Limited for providing the A41 pavement results for analysis. Researchers, staff and technicians of the School of the Built Environment are thanked for their friendship and help. Finally the author wishes to dedicate this thesis to his parents, his wife and his son for their understanding, love and moral support. ABSTRACT The aim of this research project is to develop an improved backcalculation procedure, for the determination of flexible pavement properties from the Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) test results. The conventional backcalculation methods estimate the pavement layer moduli assuming full adhesion exists between layers in the analysis process.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting to Know Your River
    Would you like to find out more about us, or about your environment? Then call us on 08708 506 506 (Mon-Fri 8-6) A user’s guide to the email River Thames enquiries@environment- agency.gov.uk or visit our website www.environment-agency.gov.uk incident hotline getting to know 0800 80 70 60 (24hrs) floodline 0845 988 1188 your river Environment first: This publication is printed on paper made from 100 per cent previously used waste. By-products from making the pulp and paper are used for composting and fertiliser, for making cement and for generating energy. GETH0309BPGK-E-P Welcome to the River Thames safe for the millions of people who use it, from anglers and naturalists to boaters, We are the Environment Agency, navigation authority for the River Thames walkers and cyclists. This leaflet is an essential guide to helping the wide variety from Lechlade to Teddington. We care for the river, keeping it clean, healthy and of users enjoy their activities in harmony. To help us maintain this harmony, please To encourage better understanding amongst river users, there are nine River User Groups (RUGs) read about activities other than your own covering the length of the river from Cricklade to to help you appreciate the needs of others. Tower Bridge. Members represent various river users, from clubs and sporting associations to commercial businesses. If you belong to a club that uses the river, encourage it to join the appropriate group. Contact your local waterway office for details. Find out more about the River Thames at www.visitthames.co.uk Before you go..
    [Show full text]