DOCSLIB.ORG

The London Gazette, Apbil 19, 1901

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The London Gazette, Apbil 19, 1901 2708 THE LONDON GAZETTE, APBIL 19, 1901. Lance-Sergeant A. Holmes. 4708 Private Cuminings. Private F. Lomax. 5297 Private Forshaw. Private J. Royle. 5106 Private Ladley. Private J. Turner. 1908 Private McKinlay. The Royal Scots Fusiliers. The York and Lancaster Regiment. Sergeant-Major John Steele. Sergeant J. Millar. 958 Sergeant Taylor. The Durham Light Infantry. 3406 Lance-Corporal Shields. Private G. Bennett. 318 Private Farr. Private J. Cottle. The Royal Welsh Fusiliers. Private E. Horton. Corporal W. Roberts. Private J. S. Parker. Lance-Corporal T. James. Private S. Pickford. 2771 Lance-Corporal Townsend. Private J. W. llobson. The Cameronians (Scottish Rifles). The Gordon Highlanders. Sergeant W. Langrish. Corporal G. McDonald. Corporal W. Poole. Princess Victoria's (Royal Irish Fusiliers). Private A. Howe. Corporal S. Fluke. The Royal Inniskilling Fusiliers. Lance-Corporal T. O'Neill (killed in action). Sergeant-Major Martin. Private T. Maher. 3108 Lance-Corporal Cleland. Private T. Smythe. 5019 Drummer FitzGerald. The Connaught Rangers. 3640 Private Thompson. 3300 Lance-Corporal Parslow. The Worcestershire Regiment. 3465 Private Kenny. Corporal J. E. Greer. 5826 Private Livingstone. Private W. Hill. The Royal Dublin Fusiliers. Private S. Banks (6th Battalion). 2423 Sergeant Connor. The East Surrey Regiment. 4290 Sergeant Hunt. Colour-Sergeant H. J. Percy. 1664 Sergeant Sheridan. Lauce-Corpqral G. Fisher. 5628 Lance-Sergeant Church. Lance-Corporal R. Parris. 3861 Lance-Corporal Kelly. Private E. Brady. 5433 Piivate Holmes. The Duke of Wellington's ( West Biding 3892 Private Kelly. Regiment). 6056 Private Reid. Private W. Parry. The Rifle Brigade (the Prince Consort's Own). The Border Regiment. Sergeant-Major W. Morrish. 1196 Sergeant Instructor of Musketry Allen. Colour-Sergeant J. Archer. 3589 Sergeant Sparke. Colour-Sergeant J. Eastwood. Lance-Sergeant A. Munro (killed in action). Sergeant J. Brooke. The Ro^al Sutsex Regiment. Sergeant W. Dyer. Private J. Gill. Corporal L. Coyne. The Prince of WaJes's Voluntetrs (South Corporal J. Macauley. • ' • • Lancashire Regiment). Private .T. Adams. 2373 Sergeant Price. Private J. Brown. 2494 Private Brighouse. Private A. Budwortb. Private H. Bracken. Private H. Jackson (Composite Regiment of Mounted Infantry). •The Essex Regiment. Private J. Bright. Royal Army Medical Corps. The Sherwood Foresters (Derbyshire Rtgiment). Corporal A. C. Ralfe. Sergeant G. Dexter, Malta Mounted Infantry Corporal W. L. Glasgow. * (died from wounds). Private F. A. Farrell. The Queen's Own (Royal West Kent Regiment). West Australian Mounted Infantry. Colour - Sergeant B. Grellier (Mounted Private H. Force. Infantry). Royal Canadian Dragoons. The King's-(Shropshire Light Infantry). Private W. A. Knisley. Lance-Sergeant W. II. Marsden. Bechuanaland Rifles. The Duke of Cambridge's Own (Middlesex Sergeant Lionel Cook. Regiment). Bethune's Mounted Infantry. Private W. Boyd. Squadron Sergeant-Major Murrow. Private J. Gilmore. Squadron Sergeant-Major J. H. McBeth. The King's Royal Rifle Corps. Border Horse.- Sergeant-Major A. H. Hill. Private G. Doyle. Bandmaster F. Tyler. Cape Police. Sergeant F. Clay. Sergeant H. M. B. Currie. 5265 Lance-Corporal Hendrick. Lance-Corporal J. W. C. Strange. Imperial Light Horse. Private W. Kibby. Lance-Corporal A. B. Duers. Private F. Limbrick. ... Private J. Patrick. Imperial Light Infantry. Corporal P. M. Weldon (killed in action). The Manchester Regiment. Private Tom Hughes. Segeant R. Lloyd. Private R. Hunter. Corporal J. C. Richardson. Private G. Heed,.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Understanding the First AIF: a Brief Guide
    Last updated August 2021 Understanding the First AIF: A Brief Guide This document has been prepared as part of the Royal Australian Historical Society’s Researching Soldiers in Your Local Community project. It is intended as a brief guide to understanding the history and structure of the First Australian Imperial Force (AIF) during World War I, so you may place your local soldier’s service in a more detailed context. A glossary of military terminology and abbreviations is provided on page 25 of the downloadable research guide for this project. The First AIF The Australian Imperial Force was first raised in 1914 in response to the outbreak of global war. By the end of the conflict, it was one of only three belligerent armies that remained an all-volunteer force, alongside India and South Africa. Though known at the time as the AIF, today it is referred to as the First AIF—just like the Great War is now known as World War I. The first enlistees with the AIF made up one and a half divisions. They were sent to Egypt for training and combined with the New Zealand brigades to form the 1st and 2nd Divisions of the Australia and New Zealand Army Corps (ANZAC). It was these men who served on Gallipoli, between April and December 1915. The 3rd Division of the AIF was raised in February 1916 and quickly moved to Britain for training. After the evacuation of the Gallipoli peninsula, 4th and 5th Divisions were created from the existing 1st and 2nd, before being sent to France in 1916.
    [Show full text]
  • Great War in the Villages Project
    Great War in the Villages Project From the website of the Australian Light Horse Association http://www.lighthorse.org.au/ The Battle of Romani 4/5 August, 1916 ...suddenly, in the confused fighting, a large body of Turks punched a gap through the defenders and swept around the edge of a high escarpment hoping to come in on the Australians' rear. However, Chauvel had already stationed a handful of Australians on top of the precipitous slopes to guard against such a move. Now these men sprang into action... Soon after midnight on August 4, 1916, the dim shadows of Turkish soldiers darted across the Sinai Desert towards the Romani tableland. Ahead lay the isolated outposts of Major-General Harry Chauvel's Anzac Mounted Division, which barred the way to their objective, the Suez Canal. Towards dawn the Turkish army sighted the Australians. Charging forward, they sliced through the thin defences, annihilating the posts before any effective resistance could be organised. And thus began the bloody battle of Romani, a conflict which, after two days of murderous fighting, saw the Anzacs shatter forever the Turkish dreams of controlling the most vital man-made waterway on earth. After the evacuation of Gallipoli, Australian infantry divisions were transferred to the Western Front in France, although General Sir Archibald Murray, British commander in the Middle East, had fought bitterly against the move. Murray was not being pig-headed. Actually he expected the Turks to advance against Egypt at any moment and he felt he could hold the enemy only with the assistance of the battle hardened Australians.
    [Show full text]
  • Military History of Kentucky
    THE AMERICAN GUIDE SERIES Military History of Kentucky CHRONOLOGICALLY ARRANGED Written by Workers of the Federal Writers Project of the Works Progress Administration for the State of Kentucky Sponsored by THE MILITARY DEPARTMENT OF KENTUCKY G. LEE McCLAIN, The Adjutant General Anna Virumque Cano - Virgil (I sing of arms and men) ILLUSTRATED Military History of Kentucky FIRST PUBLISHED IN JULY, 1939 WORKS PROGRESS ADMINISTRATION F. C. Harrington, Administrator Florence S. Kerr, Assistant Administrator Henry G. Alsberg, Director of The Federal Writers Project COPYRIGHT 1939 BY THE ADJUTANT GENERAL OF KENTUCKY PRINTED BY THE STATE JOURNAL FRANKFORT, KY. All rights are reserved, including the rights to reproduce this book a parts thereof in any form. ii Military History of Kentucky BRIG. GEN. G. LEE McCLAIN, KY. N. G. The Adjutant General iii Military History of Kentucky MAJOR JOSEPH M. KELLY, KY. N. G. Assistant Adjutant General, U.S. P. and D. O. iv Military History of Kentucky Foreword Frankfort, Kentucky, January 1, 1939. HIS EXCELLENCY, ALBERT BENJAMIN CHANDLER, Governor of Kentucky and Commander-in-Chief, Kentucky National Guard, Frankfort, Kentucky. SIR: I have the pleasure of submitting a report of the National Guard of Kentucky showing its origin, development and progress, chronologically arranged. This report is in the form of a history of the military units of Kentucky. The purpose of this Military History of Kentucky is to present a written record which always will be available to the people of Kentucky relating something of the accomplishments of Kentucky soldiers. It will be observed that from the time the first settlers came to our state, down to the present day, Kentucky soldiers have been ever ready to protect the lives, homes, and property of the citizens of the state with vigor and courage.
    [Show full text]
  • ANZAC MOUNTED DIVISION Dividedinto Three Squadrons, Each of Six Troops, a Light Horse Regiment at War Establishment Is Made up of 25 Officers and 497 Men
    CHAPTER V ANZAC MOUNTED DIVISION DIVIDEDinto three squadrons, each of six troops, a light horse regiment at war establishment is made up of 25 officers and 497 men. Of these, the Ist, and, and 3rd Brigades served complete upon Gallipoli, but the 4th Brigade was broken up upon arrival in Egypt. The 4th and 13th Regiments fought upon the Peninsula, but the 11th and 12th were disbanded, and were employed as reinforcements to other light horse units there. On their return to Egypt most of the regiments went direct from the transports to their horse-lines. There the men handed in their infantry packs, were given back their riding gear, and jingled very happily again in their spurs. During their absence in Gallipoli their horses had been to a large extent in the care of a body of public-spirited Aus- tralians, most of them well advanced in middle age, who, being refused as too old for active service, had enlisted and gone to Egypt as grooms in the light horsemen’s absence. Many of these men afterwards found employment in the remount dhpijts, and continued their useful service till the end of the war. All the regiments were much reduced in numbers, but the camps in Egypt then held abundant reinforcements, and a few weeks later eleven of the twelve regiments which after- wards served in Sinai and Palestine were at full strength. The 4th Regiment was reduced to two squadrons, one of which, together with the whole of the 13th Regiment, was sent as corps mounted troops to France, while the remaining squadron was for a time attached to an Imperial Service brigade doing special patrol duty against Turkish spies and agents upon the Egyptian side of the Canal.
    [Show full text]
  • Point Lookout Collection William L
    1 Point Lookout Collection William L. Clements Library James S. Schoff Civil War Collection The University of Michigan Prisoners' Correspondence Indices Finding aid: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/clementsead/umich-wcl-M-1688poi?view=text Prepared by Mary Parsons, 2018 Table of Contents Military Unit Index for Prisoners' Correspondence ............................................ 2 Name Index for Prisoners' Correspondence (alphabetical) ................................ 13 Letter Summaries (alphabetical by writer) .......................................................... 23 The Point Lookout Collection is made up of four series, or groups of manuscripts: 1. Official Correspondence 2. Prisoners' Correspondence 3. Correspondence from Third Parties 4. Sutlers' Receipts The indices in this document pertain only to materials found in group (2), Prisoners' Correspondence. Military Unit Index for Prisoners' Correspondence 2 Point Lookout Collection, James S. Schoff Civil War Collection William L. Clements Library Military Unit or Notes Soldier or Civilian who Rank Date(s) wrote letters (private unless otherwise stated) and Notes ALABAMA Jeff Davis Artillery, Carter's Battalion Powell, James M. 1864 March 17 1864 March 29 3rd Alabama Cavalry, Co. H Carrington, Henry Major 1864 March 18 1st Alabama Infantry Carmichael, Duncan Captain 1864 March 1 1st Alabama Infantry, Co. K Adams, Norton Kent 1864 March 1 12th Alabama Infantry, Co. A Marshall, Ferdinand 1863 Oct. 13 42nd Alabama Infantry, Co. F Blankenship, Abner, W. 1863 Oct. 10 ARKANSAS Arkansas Light Artillery, Capt. Rivers Hawkes, Benjamin K. 1863 Dec. 14 Battery probably 8th Battalion Arkansas Infantry Baird, William B. 1864 April 8 [1st Regt. Arkansas Infantry] probably 3rd Arkansas Infantry, Co. E Montgomery, James 1864 Feb. 2 20th Arkansas Infantry, Co. K Culley, John D.
    [Show full text]
  • NAPOLEON's CAVALRY by Michael Neylan 2012 the Purpose of This
    NAPOLEON’S CAVALRY by Michael Neylan 2012 The purpose of this article is to provide a foundation for understanding Napoleon’s three types of cavalry. By understanding how they were each organized, equipped, and employed, it will be possible to gain a greater understanding as to how cavalry impacted Napoleon’s battles and campaigns. This article will also set the conditions to better grasp at which level of war and which type of military operation cavalry units made their greatest contribution. The Beginning In order to appreciate the impact the French cavalry had on Napoleon’s campaigns, one must first know what Napoleon had to work with and how he planned to use it. When he rose to power in 1799 as First Consul, Napoleon inherited eighty-five regiments of cavalry. While this may initially appear to be a substantial number of mounted units, his French forces did not compare to the quality of Prussian or Austrian cavalry. The eighty-five regiments were grouped into three different categories: thirty-eight light regiments, twenty medium regiments, and twenty-seven heavy regiments of cavalry, each type being employed in various manners. As Gunther Rothenberg described: “Convinced that it was not possible to fight anything but a defensive war without at least parity in cavalry, Napoleon made great efforts to turn this branch into a powerful striking force, capable of rupturing the enemy front, while retaining its ability for exploitation, pursuit and reconnaissance.” By the end of the Napoleonic era, the quality of the French cavalry would be greatly improved compared o its modest beginnings.
    [Show full text]
  • Marksmanship, Officerman Relations and the Short Magazine Leeenfield
    Marksmanship, officer-man relations and the Short Magazine Lee-Enfield Article (Accepted Version) Ford, Matthew (2016) Marksmanship, officer-man relations and the Short Magazine Lee-Enfield. War in History, 23 (3). pp. 278-295. ISSN 0968-3445 This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/54999/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk Marksmanship, officer-man relations and the Short Magazine Lee-Enfield Abstract: This article examines the British Army’s decision to adopt the Short Magazine Lee-Enfield (SMLE) in 1903.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paper Trail of the Civil War in Kentucky 1861-1865 1
    The Paper Trail of the Civil War in Kentucky 1861-1865 1 The This publication pertaining to Paper the Civil War in Kentucky is a special edition spanning the Trail four years of the Civil War 1861-1865. Almost every entry Of the in this publication is refer- enced to the specific item it was Civil War obtained from. In Kentucky It will be incorporated into the “work in progress” book enti- 1861-1865 tled, “The Paper Trail of the Ken- tucky National Guard” that will be published in 2002. The finished book will be a compilation of the military his- tory of each of the 120 counties Compiled by Colonel (Ret.) Ar- of the Commonwealth. mando “Al” Alfaro The over 720 pages will be an excellent reference book on Kentucky’s military history from the War of 1812 to the Al Alfaro 651 Raven Drive present day Army and Air Frankfort, KY 40601 Kentucky National Guard. 502 223-8318 [email protected] The Paper Trail of the Civil War in Kentucky 1861-1865 2 Index Pg Index Pg Civil War Casualties 3 Henderson 36 22 Courthouses Burned 3 Henry – Hickman 37 Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address 3 Hopkins – Jackson – Jefferson 38 Civil War Unit Organizations 3 Jessamine 41 Civil War Skirmishes 3 Johnson 42 Riders Horse Hoof Determines Death 3 Kenton 43 Kentucky Confederate Units 3 Knott – Knox 44 Kentucky Union Units 4 Larue – Laurel 45 Kentucky US Colored Troop Units 5 Lawrence – Lee – Leslie – Letcher - Lewis 46 Taps 5 Lincoln – Livingston - Madison 47 Civil War Campaign Streamers 6 Logan – Lyon - Madison 48 Seven Civil War Soldiers Become 6 Magoffin 49 Presidents Marion
    [Show full text]
  • 1St King's Dragoon Guards
    1st King’s Dragoon Guards – The other regiment. By Graham Alexander ______________________________________________________________________________ When the 17th Lancers left the shelter of Lord Chelmsford’s square at Ulundi, to drive the wavering Zulus back at the point of their lowered lancers, they reinforced their reputation of being the Death or Glory Boys. Riding right behind them was a troop of just 24 men, led by Lieutenant Robert Abraham Brewster French-Brewster and representing the other cavalry regiment on campaign who had received little of the acclaim. Did the Lancers receive preferential treatment during the course of the campaign? Many people had already accused Lord Chelmsford of not using the King’s Dragoon Guards as effectively as he might have, but was this criticism justified? Following the disaster at Isandlwana, Lord Chelmsford again appealed to the War Office for the urgent dispatch of two cavalry regiments, who he wished to act as mounted infantry when a new invasion of Zululand was prepared. Although the War Office had originally dragged their feet when Imperial cavalry was first requested in 1878, they now wasted no time in ordering two regiments to prepare to embark to Natal. Their choices were the 17th Lancers and also the 1st King’s Dragoon Guards, who were currently based at Aldershot. The regiment received notice on the 12th February for overseas service and preparations were made to bring the regiment up to wartime strength. Volunteers from other corps were accepted and additional horses were eagerly sought. Eventually 622 men and 580 horses were assembled. A cavalry regiment, like every other regiment, was built up in increasing multiples.
    [Show full text]
  • During the Civil War
    During the Civil War “I wish a movement made to seize...the mountain pass called Cumberland Gap.” -Abraham Lincoln (Oct. 1, 1861) First Occupation of the Confederate General Felix Zollicoffer took control of the Cumberland Gap Gap, easily overcoming local Home Guard opposition, and Mid 1861 - June 17, 1862 began building fortifications on the north side of the mountain face to halt any Union invasion of Tennessee. After Zollicoffer was killed at the Battle of Mill Springs, Colonel James E. Raines, soon to become General, commanded the Gap until General Carter Stevenson reinforced the Gap and became commander. General Felix Zollicoffer Second Occupation of the General Stevenson and his command were ordered away Cumberland Gap from the Gap and deeper into Tennessee. With June 18 - Sep. 17, 1862 Confederate forces gone, Union General George W. Morgan took control of the Gap and built fortifications along the southern side of the mountain on orders from President Abraham Lincoln. The President was determined to keep Kentucky in the Union and to protect the pro-Union population of East Tennessee. Holding the Gap could also be a staging point for a Union advance on Knoxville that would sever the rail line from Knoxville to Richmond, General George Morgan Virginia. Third Occupation of the In 1862, a major invasion of Kentucky was launched by the Cumberland Gap South. General Morgan left the Gap and Confederate Sep. 18, 1862 - Sep. 9, General Edmund Kirby Smith took control during the 1863 Kentucky Campaign led by Confederate General Braxton Bragg. The Gap served as the route through which Bragg retreated into Tennessee.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Lawrence of Arabia and the Light
    George Lambert Jerusalem from the top of the Dung Gate (1919, oil with pencil on wood panel, 19.6 x 45.9 cm, ART02855) CONTENTS 1 Director’s foreword 2 Nigel Steel, “The great ride”: Romani to Damascus 12 Peter Burness, The Australian Light Horse 22 Jeremy Wilson, Lawrence, the Arabs and Damascus 31 Mal Booth, The seven pillars of Lawrence’s wisdom Stuart Reid Handley Page reaches rendezvous with Lawrence of Arabia (1918, oil on canvas, 50 x 61 cm, AWM ART14279) On 23 September 1918 Captain Ross Smith flew No. 1 Squadron’s Handley Page 0/400 to meet Lawrence at Um es Surab. DIRECTOR’S FOREWORD 1 The exhibition Lawrence of Arabia and the Light been out of print. In recent years there has been Horse is a show that the Memorial is very proud to a strong renewal of interest in its contents. Many present. It is based on solid scholarship here and soldiers too left their own accounts in snapshots, international cooperation. The Imperial War Museum, letters, and diaries. London, which staged an exhibition on Lawrence The exhibition presents a range of precious objects, of Arabia two years ago, has been of great assistance. and it also refers to the other ways this campaign in Additionally, we are indebted to the generosity the Middle East has been recalled. In 1940 the film of a number of overseas lenders. Developing this Forty Thousand Horsemen was released; it became exhibition has also provided an opportunity for the an Australian classic. In 1962 Lawrence of Arabia Memorial to present some of its important historical appeared.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Beersheba
    Running head: BATTLE OF BEERSHEBA The Battle of Beersheba Strategic and Tactical Pivot of Palestine Zachary Grafman A Senior Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation in the Honors Program Liberty University Spring 2013 BATTLE OF BEERSHEBA 2 Acceptance of Senior Honors Thesis This Senior Honors Thesis is accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation from the Honors Program of Liberty University. ______________________________ David Snead, Ph.D. Thesis Chair ______________________________ Robert Ritchie, M.A. Committee Member ______________________________ Randal Price, Ph.D. Committee Member ______________________________ Brenda Ayres, Ph.D. Honors Director ______________________________ Date BATTLE OF BEERSHEBA 3 Abstract The Battle of Beersheba, fought on October 31, 1917, was a vital turning point in the British campaign against the Ottoman Turks. The battle opened a gap in the Turkish line that eventually resulted in the British takeover of Palestine. The British command saw the cavalry charge of the 4th Light Horse Brigade as a new tactical opportunity, and this fac- tored into the initiative for new light tank forces designed around the concepts of mobility and flanking movements. What these commanders failed to realize was that the Palestine Campaign was an anachronistic theater of war in comparison to the rest of the Great War. The charge of the 4th Light Horse, while courageous and vital to the success of the Battle of Beersheba, also owed its success to a confluence of advantageous circumstances, which the British command failed to take into account when designing their light tank forces prior to World War II. BATTLE OF BEERSHEBA 4 The Battle of Beersheba: Strategic and Tactical Pivot of Palestine World War I has taken its place in the public perception as a trench war, a conflict of brutal struggle between industrial powers that heaped up dead and wounded and for- ever changed Europe’s consciousness.
    [Show full text]