DOCSLIB.ORG

ROYAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY Newsletter New Series, 8, November 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ROYAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY Newsletter New Series, 8, November 2011 ROYAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY newsletter new series, 8, November 2011 Presidential Letter Colin Jones Queen Mary University of London IN THIS ISSUE My Presidential Letter this autumn aims Policy Committee, and just last week to provide colleagues with just a flavour he and I hosted our now annual meeting Presidential Letter of the range of activities and initiatives with History representatives of the main 1 in which I am involved on the Society’s A-Level examining boards. Commercial News from TNA behalf. rivalry between the boards means that 2 they rarely meet together, and we like Only last week, for example, the Society to think the discussions are as helpful for Making an Impact in made a formal response to Hefce on them as for us, as we take the pulse of our the Community the Research Excellence Framework discipline in the schools. We are keeping Andrew Davies - 3 consultation. Jo Innes, Vice-President for a weather eye on for the impending The IHR turns 90 Research Policy, and I drafted the response announcement of changes to the national Jane Winters - 4-5 following discussion within the Society. curriculum, a subject on which we have Some things we are all probably unhappy lobbied Secretary of State, Michael Gove, Society for the Study about – viz. ‘impact’ – are non-negotiable and plan to do so again. of French History by now, but we identified issues where Malcolm Crook - 6 there seemed room for improvement. Most Earlier this summer, I was invited to The London Mosque eye-catching of these were anti-diluvian represent the Society at a lunch held in Humayun Ansari - 7 proposals concerning how maternity the Houses of Parliament to honour Eric leave is taken into account in producing Hobsbawm and Hugh Thomas. The event New President-Elect research outputs. We feel confident that was organised by the All-Party Group on for the RHS these will be changed. We were also happy Archives and History. Following on from 8 to commend some proposals – such as this occasion, I have been invited to RHS Fellowships ‘double-weighting’ of major monographs – attend the officers’ meetings of the Group. 9 as in the interests of the discipline. Many parliamentarians are of course historians by training and affection, so RHS Prizes and Peter Mandler, my successor as President there are important links to nurture here. Awards from late 2012 (see p. 8), is currently our 10-11 Vice-President and chair of the Education Also over the summer, our Publications Forthcoming Events 12 2 Committee has been discussing with Brepols and In September, our indefatigable administrators, the Institute of Historical Research, our partners Sue Carr and Melanie Ransom, reported to in the Bibliography of British and Irish History, our Finance Committee that the Society’s plans to introduce a reduced BBIH subscription membership has passed the 3,000 mark for the for the Society membership from 2012. We first time in its history. It is encouraging to see anticipate a reduced rate being particularly particular growth in the category of Members – helpful to our Retired Fellows (a group which usually early career scholars, a group for which now numbers over 600) and to those who are the Society has particular concern, and whose independent scholars. activities we nurture through our prizes and awards for research activity. Much else is in the pipeline. In November, I will be leading a delegation of Council to participate Growing membership subscriptions allow us to in a research symposium at the University of continue and expand the work of the Society – its Glamorgan for one of our two annual visits to publications, its events, its awards, and so on – institutions outside London. In the same month, which forms the backdrop to the highlights I have we will host the annual Colin Matthew Lecture mentioned. In all of this normal and everyday for the Public Understanding of History, and I work, I am very lucky to draw on the help of will deliver the third of my four Presidential an excellent team. Linchpin of much that we Addresses. In December, I will be present at the have done in recent years has been the Society’s East London Mosque, representing the Society at Honorary Secretary, Vanessa Harding. Vanessa is the launch of our latest Camden Series volume, standing down from her post in November. This is the fascinating The Making of the East London an appropriate time to thank her warmly for all Mosque (see p. 7). In addition, we are also that she has achieved for the Society during her currently working with The National Archives tenure. on our Gerald Aylmer Seminar in February 2012 devoted to ‘Locating the Past’. priorities, essentially the big questions facing TNA News from TNA at the moment. We hope that by answering these key questions we will be able to provide an even Ruth Roberts, TNA more effective service to researchers. At The National Archives (TNA) we have dedicated We are keen to increase collaboration with the staff who are committed to carrying out historical academic community, so if you think a visit from research enabling us to provide sound advice, TNA’s Research Team would be beneficial to you improve access to our collection and share and your institution please let us know and we knowledge with not just the academic community would be happy to arrange a visit. Maybe you’d but the wider general public. Collaborating with like to hear more about working with TNA or academics to undertake such historical research our new research strategy, or are particularly is important and we welcome applications to interested in a specific project or collection, or partner and/or support external research projects. would like to find out more about TNA’s general However, due to limited resources, we are plans for the future. We could attend a staff unable to support every application we receive. development session or speak to students – We are therefore in the process of drawing up whatever format works best for you. Please do get a set of historical research priorities. These in touch if you are interested. priorities will be available on our website soon but, in the meantime, if you are interested in And, lastly, if you haven’t already, please sign up undertaking historical research in collaboration for alerts for our online newsletter by emailing: with The National Archives please email research@ [email protected]. The nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk for further information. newsletter allows you to keep up-to-date with TNA. For previous editions see: http://www. As well as the historical research priorities, we nationalarchives.gov.uk/about/research/news.htm. have also identified a set of strategic research to Rob Lees and Jill Hughes, co-founders of MaD, a 3 Making an Impact in not-for-profit community theatre company based in Moston in North Manchester. They write and the Community perform topical plays for mainly local, working- class audiences and they seized on one of the Andrew Davies, University of Liverpool book’s central episodes: a feud between rival gangs on the city’s north side during the 1880s. When I started research on youth gangs and street Knife-crime was all too resonant for some of the violence in Victorian Manchester and Salford, I group’s younger members, and they helped to flesh never dreamed I’d find myself playing Angus Reach, out Lees and Hughes’ script for Angels with Manky author of one of my primary sources, on film. Faces, a tragi-comedy set in Victorian Manchester. I published some of my findings in The Gangs of Manchester in 2008. Keen to attract local as well In this collaboration, my academic expertise as academic readers, I opted for a ‘true crime’ became a resource for the group. I was able to publisher, Milo Books, rather than a university advise on language, costumes and sets, and – just press. What I didn’t fully anticipate was the sheer as importantly – make calls to journalists and local hunger for history beyond academia and the media. TV / radio producers, some of whom were initially Invitations to read from the book flooded in: from sceptical of the newsworthiness of ‘community libraries, schools, community centres, youth clubs, arts’. At the first production meeting, Rob Lees probation hostels and a writer-in-residence at HM pointed out that the main risk we ran was being Prison Manchester (Strangeways). accused of glamorising gangs. We took the decision that no fight scenes were to be acted out on stage. Many of those who attended the public talks had MaD productions regularly intersperse live scenes already read the book and were eager to discuss and black-and-white film sequences shot by long- its implications for our present-day concerns with term collaborator, Paul Cliff. For Angels, Paul gangs and knife-crime. Older Mancunians, aware filmed two fight sequences featuring members of that they had enjoyed opportunities denied to the cast and junior supporters of the community their own grandchildren, lamented the decline football club, FC United of Manchester. of apprenticeships, but they also bemoaned the demise of local lads’ clubs – initially formed in Several celebrities did filmed cameos in Angels: response to fears surrounding gangs in the 1880s. actors from Coronation Street and Early Doors, and members of The Smiths and Inspiral Carpets, whose How did the filming come about? I offered the book songs we used as soundtracks to our films. We even had Terry Christian playing a wayward priest. The first run of Angels with Manky Faces – a week at Manchester’s Library Theatre in August 2009 – sold-out weeks in advance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Issues and Agenda the Medieval State: the Tyranny of a Concept?*
    Journal of Historical Sociology Vol. 16 No. 2 June 2003 ISSN 0952-1909 Issues and Agenda The Medieval State: The Tyranny of a Concept?* REES DAVIES The Case for “the Medieval State” Medieval historians seem to be falling in love with the word “state”, and with all that it implies. Such at least might be the conclusion to be drawn from the titles of some of the books they have pub- lished recently: such as James Given, State and Society in Medieval Europe. Gwynedd and Languedoc under Outside Rule (1990); James Campbell, The Anglo-Saxon State (2000), a collection of essays mainly of the 1990s on early England as “an elaborately organized state”; Matthew Innes’s path-breaking State and Society in the early middle ages: the middle Rhine valley 400–1000 (2000); and, most recently, a festschrift, edited by John Maddicott and David Palliser, presented to James Campbell under the title The Medieval State (2000). Given that the authors who have contributed to this latter volume classify Northumbria, Wessex, Brittany, and Scotland as states, it comes as no surprise that we now hear murmurs of the Pictish state. Where will it all end? Or perhaps, more to the point, where and why has it all begun? To a certain extent it is no doubt a reaction against the infuriat- ing condescension of historians of the modern period towards medieval polities and kingdoms. Such historians seem to subscribe to the view that since the word “state” did not acquire its “modern” connotations until the fifteenth or sixteenth centuries, then the state itself is a post-1500 phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • ©2011 Steven M. Kawczak All Rights Reserved
    ©2011 STEVEN M. KAWCZAK ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BELIEFS AND APPROACHES TO DEATH AND DYING IN LATE SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY ENGLAND A Dissertation Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Steven M. Kawczak December, 2011 BELIEFS AND APPROACHES TO DEATH AND DYING IN LATE SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY ENGLAND Steven M. Kawczak Dissertation Approved: Accepted: ____________________________ ____________________________ Advisor Department Chair Michael F. Graham, Ph.D. Michael Sheng, Ph.D. ____________________________ ____________________________ Faculty Reader Dean of the College Michael Levin, Ph.D. Chand K. Midha, Ph.D. ____________________________ ____________________________ Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Constance Bouchard, Ph.D. George R. Newkome, Ph.D. ____________________________ ____________________________ Faculty Reader Date Howard Ducharme, Ph.D. ____________________________ Faculty Reader Matthew Crawford, Ph.D. ii ABSTRACT This dissertation is about death and its relationship to religion in late seventeenth- century England. The primary argument is that while beliefs about death stemmed from the Reformation tradition, divergent religious reforms of Puritanism and Arminianism did not lead to differing approaches to death. People adapted religious ideas on general terms of Protestant Christianity and not specifically aligned with varying reform movements. This study links apologetics and sermons concerning spiritual death, physical death, and remedies for each to cultural practice through the lens of wills and graves to gauge religious influence. Readers are reminded of the origins of reformed thought, which is what seventeenth-century English theologians built their ideas upon. Religious debates of the day centered on the Puritan and Arminian divide, which contained significantly different ideas of soteriology, a key aspect of a good death in the English ars moriendi.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Argument and Practice Bibliography for Lectures 2019-20
    HISTORICAL ARGUMENT AND PRACTICE BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR LECTURES 2019-20 Useful Websites http://www.besthistorysites.net http://tigger.uic.edu/~rjensen/index.html http://www.jstor.org [e-journal articles] http://www.lib.cam.ac.uk/ejournals_list/ [all e-journals can be accessed from here] http://www.historyandpolicy.org General Reading Ernst Breisach, Historiography: Ancient, Medieval, and Modern (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983) R. G. Collingwood, The Idea of History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1946) Donald R. Kelley, Faces of History: Historical Inquiry from Herodotus to Herder (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998) Donald R. Kelley, Fortunes of History: Historical Inquiry from Herder to Huizinga (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003) R. J. Evans, In Defence of History (2nd edn., London, 2001). E. H. Carr, What is History? (40th anniversary edn., London, 2001). Forum on Transnational History, American Historical Review, December 2006, pp1443-164. G.R. Elton, The Practice of History (2nd edn., Oxford, 2002). K. Jenkins, Rethinking History (London, 1991). C. Geertz, Local Knowledge (New York, 1983) M. Collis and S. Lukes, eds., Rationality and Relativism (London, 1982) D. Papineau, For Science in the Social Sciences (London, 1978) U. Rublack ed., A Concise Companion to History (Oxford, 2011) Q.R.D. Skinner, Visions of Politics Vol. 1: Regarding Method (Cambridge, 2002) David Cannadine, What is History Now, ed. (Basingstoke, 2000). -----------------------INTRODUCTION TO HISTORIOGRAPHY---------------------- Thu. 10 Oct. Who does history? Prof John Arnold J. H. Arnold, History: A Very Short Introduction (2000), particularly chapters 2 and 3 S. Berger, H. Feldner & K. Passmore, eds, Writing History: Theory & Practice (2003) P.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 Williams 1502
    GLANMOR WILLIAMS Glanmor Williams 1920–2005 IT IS A WELL-KNOWN FACT that adult males born in Wales are the shortest in Britain, and on a good day Glanmor Williams measured just over five feet in his stockinged feet. But physical stature has never mattered to the natives of Dowlais, and this Lilliputian man, by dint of intellectual bril- liance, far-sighted vision and exceptional personal charm, achieved tow- ering eminence in the field of Welsh historical studies. At most gatherings he cut a compelling figure, and he was particularly adept at turning his smallness to advantage. Having famously written in the preface to his first big book that the work had ‘like Topsy, “just growed”’, it amused him thereafter to reproach nature for denying him the same opportunity.1 When he was chairman of the Broadcasting Council for Wales in the late 1960s, he impishly confessed never to have been able to see eye to eye with the impossibly tall Controller of the BBC in Wales, Alun Oldfield-Davies. On another occasion there was much mirth in the Williams household when a reporter described him in the Evening News as a ‘pint-sized but very eloquent professor of history’.2 Few Welsh scholars in the modern era have served their profession, university and country as admirably as this diminutive giant and the flourishing condition of Welsh historical studies during the last half century is in considerable measure attributa- ble to his influence. Yet, in spite of his unrivalled standing as a Welsh his- torian and the weight of honours he accumulated over the years, he remained unspoiled by his academic successes and public achievements, 1 Glanmor Williams, The Welsh Church from Conquest to Reformation (Cardiff, 1962), p.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is National Biography For? Dictionaries and Digital History Philip Carter
    4 WHAT IS NATIONAL BIOGRAPHY FOR? DICTIONARIES AND DIGITAL HISTORY PHILIP CARTER Ask the purpose of national biography and you may be forgiven for thinking this an easier question for previous generations to answer. In June 1900 the original British Dictionary of National Biography (DNB) reached its completion with the publication of a 63rd and final volume— an event hailed as a triumph by reviewers and compilers alike. For the Pall Mall Gazette, this was ‘the best dictionary of home biography possessed of any nation’, while the Athenaeum championed ‘our British lexicographers’ who ‘have had the satisfaction of administering a handsome beating to their most formidable rivals, the Germans’.1 The DNB’s editor at the time was the Elizabethan literary scholar Sidney Lee, who had driven the project on during the 1890s and infused it with an enhanced degree of scholarly rigour. Lee celebrated the Dictionary’s completion in similarly confident fashion, praising an ‘undertaking of exceptional magnitude in the history of publishing’ that was more extensive, coherent, and rapidly produced than ‘cyclopaedias of national 1 Quoted in Keith Thomas, Changing Conceptions of National Biography: TheOxford DNB in Historical Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 27. doi.org/10.1017/CBO 9780511497582; ‘Dictionary of National Biography. Edited by Sidney Lee—Vol. LXII’, Athenaeum, 14 July 1900, 45, quoted in Juliette Atkinson, Victorian Biography Reconsidered: A Study of Nineteenth-Century ‘Hidden’ Lives (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 231. doi.org/10.1093/ acprof:oso/9780199572137.001.0001. 57 ‘TRUE Biographies of Nations?’ biography abroad’, including those of Belgium, the Netherlands, Sweden, the United States of America, and again Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Journal (28 November 2018): 1–20
    This is the author’s accepted manuscript. For the published article, see: 6 “New life in the modern cultural history of death”, Historical Journal (28 November 2018): 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X18000444 HISTORIOGRAPHICAL REVIEW NEW LIFE IN THE MODERN CULTURAL HISTORY OF DEATH* HANNAH MALONE Freie Universität Berlin ABSTRACT. This essay presents a critical overview of recent literature in English on the modern cultural history of death. In order to locate new developments, it charts the evolution of the field from the 1970s until today and distinguishes between French and Anglophone strands in the historiography. A selection of studies published between 2005 and 2015 exemplifies a revival in recent scholarship that hangs on four main innovations: the abandonment of grand narratives of modernization and secularization; an interdisciplinary integration of political, cultural, and intellectual history; greater attention to the individual; and the expansion of the field beyond Europe and North America. Thus, today the history of death is both local and global, public and private, personal and universal. Everyone dies, but dying too has a history. Although death is universal and timeless, the way in which it is thought of, and dealt with, varies in time and place. Being by their nature bound to tradition, the rites of death evolve at a relatively slow pace and can be easy to grasp. They are also tied to morality, memory, religion, and kinship, and to issues of origin and destiny that lie at the root of our definitions of civilization. Thus, the history of death presents an opportunity to explore what it means to be human – an opportunity that historians have approached from different viewpoints.
    [Show full text]
  • Name of Your Publication
    Race, Ethnicity and Equality in UK History RHS Roadmap for Change Update II Royal Historical Society November 2020 Margot Finn and Diya Gupta © The Royal Historical Society 2020. All rights reserved. University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT. This work is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ TABLE OF CONTENTS ________________________________________________________ 1. Introduction 2 2. RHS Roadmap for Change II 3 3. Events responding to the 2018 Race Report 12 4. Engagements beyond the RHS: In-person and Online 18 5. History Departmental Responses 28 6. Looking Ahead 41 7. Selected Further Reading 42 2 RHS Roadmap for Change II PART 1. INTRODUCTION ________________________________________________________ This is the second Roadmap for Change update published by the Royal Historical Society (RHS). In October 2018, the RHS published Race, Ethnicity & Equality in UK History: A Report and Resource for Change, committing the Society to an annual audit of our own and our colleagues’ efforts to promote equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) in History with specific respect to race and ethnicity.1 In December 2019, we published our first Roadmap for Change update, a 40-page document that surveyed RHS and other learned society efforts to promote racial and ethnic equality and provided information on responses to the Society’s 2018 report by UK History subject groups, departments, faculties and schools.2 In Roadmap II, we begin by surveying the steps taken by the RHS since Roadmap I to improve the Society’s own practices and performance with respect to race, ethnicity and equality, and note areas for future action.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roots of Nationalism
    HERITAGE AND MEMORY STUDIES 1 HERITAGE AND MEMORY STUDIES Did nations and nation states exist in the early modern period? In the Jensen (ed.) field of nationalism studies, this question has created a rift between the so-called ‘modernists’, who regard the nation as a quintessentially modern political phenomenon, and the ‘traditionalists’, who believe that nations already began to take shape before the advent of modernity. While the modernist paradigm has been dominant, it has been challenged in recent years by a growing number of case studies that situate the origins of nationalism and nationhood in earlier times. Furthermore, scholars from various disciplines, including anthropology, political history and literary studies, have tried to move beyond this historiographical dichotomy by introducing new approaches. The Roots of Nationalism: National Identity Formation in Early Modern Europe, 1600-1815 challenges current international scholarly views on the formation of national identities, by offering a wide range of contributions which deal with early modern national identity formation from various European perspectives – especially in its cultural manifestations. The Roots of Nationalism Lotte Jensen is Associate Professor of Dutch Literary History at Radboud University, Nijmegen. She has published widely on Dutch historical literature, cultural history and national identity. Edited by Lotte Jensen The Roots of Nationalism National Identity Formation in Early Modern Europe, 1600-1815 ISBN: 978-94-6298-107-2 AUP.nl 9 7 8 9 4 6 2 9 8 1 0 7 2 The Roots of Nationalism Heritage and Memory Studies This ground-breaking series examines the dynamics of heritage and memory from a transnational, interdisciplinary and integrated approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Historical Society Report of Council Session 2013 – 2014
    ROYAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY REPORT OF COUNCIL SESSION 2013 – 2014 Officers and Council At the Anniversary Meeting on 23 November 2013 the Officers of the Society were re-elected. The Vice-Presidents retiring under By-law XVII were Mr R Fisher and Professor C K Kidd. Professor S J Connolly, BA, DPhil and Professor M T Vincent, MA, DPhil were elected in their place. The Members of Council retiring under By-law XX were Professor S Dixon, Professor K C Fincham and Dr J Lewis. Professor C R E Cubitt, BA, MA, PhD, Professor O P Grell, BA, MA and Professor N Tadmor, BA, MA, PhD were elected in their place. The Society’s administrative staff consists of Dr Sue Carr, Executive Secretary, Mrs Melanie Ransom, Administrative Secretary and Dr Jane Gerson, Research and Communications Officer. Kingston Smith were re-appointed auditors for the year 2013-2014 under By- law XXXIX. Brewin Dolphin Securities were re-appointed to manage the Society’s investment funds. Activities of the Society during the year In the current session the Society took some important steps towards fulfilling its strategy of improving its communications with the wider world, with the historical community, and with its own Fellows and Members, as discussed in last year’s report. A major overhaul of its web presence has been in the forefront of this strategy – first, establishing a presence in social media (Facebook and, of increasing importance, Twitter); second, commissioning a new website, which will be launched in autumn 2014. The website will include a diverse menu of new
    [Show full text]
  • Planet Magazine
    plpalanet 1n40 et The Welsh Internationalist April/May 2000 3 In the Screen’s Glow 66 Making Good Boundaries John Barnie Joshua A. Fishman Interviewed by Xabier Erize 6 In Steel and Stone Jonathan Adams and the Wales 76 The Shadow in the Woods Millennium Centre America and Hallowe’en Stephen Evans Ozi Rhys Osmond 14 The Key to Annie’s Room 83 The Counter-Productive Critic Rugby Mania A Reply to John Lovering’s Robert Minhinnick Critique of Objective One Kevin Morgan 19 The Planet Cartoon Peter Roberts 89 How to be Conscious The Latest Theories about Human 20 The Artisan-Translator and the Consciousness Artist-Translator Roger Caldwell John Rutherford 96 † Baroness White 27 Beyond Our Ken What Does London Mean for 98 † Tudor David Wales? Ned Thomas 99 Attitude 33 Innocent Eyes 100 Reviews Naive Realism in Wales Peter Wakelin 120 Scene Music • IT • Theatre • Internet • 42 Seconding the Motion Sport The Poetry of Owen Sheers Claire Powell Poems Billie Livingston (31) Dewi Stephen 47 Vennerberg’s Ghost Jones (60) Anne Stevenson (61) A Short Story Emyr Humphreys Covers: Computer generated images of the Wales Millennium Centre plpalanet 1n41 et The Welsh Internationalist June/July 2000 3 The Arts Council of Wales 56 A Way of Talking to People John Barnie The Debate About High Art Hugh Macpherson 7 Devolution and the Crisis of Representation 62 Creeping Jesus Tony Benn Interviewed by A Short Story Ian Rappel David Callard 16 Inclusivepolitics.con? 65 Revisiting the Athens of Wales The National Assembly Aberdare, Theatre and Disenfranchisement
    [Show full text]
  • PART I PAPER 3 BRITISH POLITICAL HISTORY, 1050-C. 1500 2017-2018
    PART I PAPER 3 BRITISH POLITICAL HISTORY, 1050-­­c. 1500 2017-­­2018 READING LIST FOR STUDENTS & SUPERVISORS Edward I. Memoranda roll, E368/69m (1297-­­98) Bibliography and Reference 1050 -­­ 1509 ........................................................................... 5 Abbreviations used ................................................................................................................................ 5 A. The Conquest and the Normans: Anglo-­­Norman England 1050-­­1154 ................... 44 General and introductory .................................................................................................................. 44 Sources .................................................................................................................................................... 44 The Conquest of Anglo-•­Saxon England ........................................................................................... 45 England and Normandy ...................................................................................................................... 45 Kings and kingship .............................................................................................................................. 46 Kingship: ideas and practices ........................................................................................................... 46 King William I ..................................................................................................................................... 46 King William Rufus ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Read Keith Thomas' the Wolfson History Prize 1972-2012
    THE WOLFSON HISTORY PRIZE 1972-2012 An Informal History Keith Thomas THE WOLFSON HISTORY PRIZE 1972-2012 An Informal History Keith Thomas The Wolfson Foundation, 2012 Published by The Wolfson Foundation 8 Queen Anne Street London W1G 9LD www.wolfson.org.uk Copyright © The Wolfson Foundation, 2012 All rights reserved The Wolfson Foundation is grateful to the National Portrait Gallery for allowing the use of the images from their collection Excerpts from letters of Sir Isaiah Berlin are quoted with the permission of the trustees of the Isaiah Berlin Literary Trust, who own the copyright Printed in Great Britain by The Bartham Group ISBN 978-0-9572348-0-2 This account draws upon the History Prize archives of the Wolfson Foundation, to which I have been given unrestricted access. I have also made use of my own papers and recollections. I am grateful to Paul Ramsbottom and Sarah Newsom for much assistance. The Foundation bears no responsibility for the opinions expressed, which are mine alone. K.T. Lord Wolfson of Marylebone Trustee of the Wolfson Foundation from 1955 and Chairman 1972-2010 © The Wolfson Foundation FOREWORD The year 1972 was a pivotal one for the Wolfson Foundation: my father, Lord Wolfson of Marylebone, became Chairman and the Wolfson History Prize was established. No coincidence there. History was my father’s passion and primary source of intellectual stimulation. History books were his daily companions. Of all the Foundation’s many activities, none gave him greater pleasure than the History Prize. It is an immense sadness that he is not with us to celebrate the fortieth anniversary.
    [Show full text]