DOCSLIB.ORG

REQUEST for CEO ENDORSEMENT/APPROVAL PROJECT TYPE: FULL-SIZED PROJECT the GEF TRUST FUND S Submission Date: 06/07/2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REQUEST for CEO ENDORSEMENT/APPROVAL PROJECT TYPE: FULL-SIZED PROJECT the GEF TRUST FUND S Submission Date: 06/07/2012 REQUEST FOR CEO ENDORSEMENT/APPROVAL PROJECT TYPE: FULL-SIZED PROJECT THE GEF TRUST FUND S Submission Date: 06/07/2012 PART I: PROJECT INFORMATION Expected Calendar (mm/dd/yy) GEFSEC PROJECT ID: 4035 Milestones Dates GEF AGENCY PROJECT ID: P120561 Work Program (for FSPs only) COUNTRY(IES): Tunisia Agency Approval date 11/30/2012 PROJECT TITLE: Ecotourism and Conservation of Desert Implementation Start 01/01/2013 Biodiversity Project Mid-term Evaluation (if planned) 30/06/2016 GEF AGENCY(IES): World Bank Project Closing Date 01/01/2018 OTHER EXECUTING PARTNER(S): DGEQV, DGF, ONTT, CRDAs GEF FOCAL AREA(s): BD and LD GEF-4 STRATEGIC PROGRAM(s): BD1 and BD2; LD-SP1 and LD-SP3 NAME OF PARENT PROGRAM/UMBRELLA PROJECT: MENARID A. PROJECT FRAMEWORK Project Objective: To contribute to the conservation of desert biodiversity in the three targeted National Parks. This will be achieved through the piloting of an improved approach to protected areas management that integrates ecotourism development and community engagement. Indicate Project whether Expected Expected GEF Financing1 Co-Financing1 Total ($) Components Investment, Outcomes Outputs ($) a % ($) b % c=a+ b TA, or STA2 1. Promoting TA 1. Appropriate Draft Decree for 1,552,950 36 1,313,500 27 2,866,450 enabling conditions incentive the revised for PA framework for legislative management, SLM ecotourism framework for scale up and created. PAs is prepared. ecotourism development 2. Policy and Revised Decree regulatory for the frameworks classification of governing the accommodations environment is prepared. and related sectors incorporate 3 additional staff measures to per targeted NP conserve and (1 conservation sustainably use engineer, 1 eco- desert guard/animator biodiversity. in charge of liaison with 3. An increased communities number of land and and water users environmental adopt education, and 1 sustainable land socioeconomic and water activities 1 management coordinator are practices that in place. support sustainable 600 stakeholders agriculture and receive training rangeland in the areas of management PA and provide management, long term ecotourism biodiversity and development, livelihood SLM, and benefits. environmental education using an INRM approach. 2. Supporting the Investment 1. Ecotourism 160 jobs are 2,515,850 59 2,974,500 63 5,490,350 implementation of development is created linked to INRM in targeted taking place park NPs and their within management adjacent areas environmentally and economic and activities over ecologically the three sound, targeted NPs. adaptable management of Targeted NPs parks and achieve higher reserves in arid management lands. efficiency scores (75 for Jbil NP, 2. Financially 65 for viable and Dghoumes NP sustainable and 84 for ecotourism Bouhedma NP, ventures compare to a established. current baseline of 60 for Jbil 3. Incentives NP, 54 for generated for Dghoumes NP, local and 76 for communities to Bouhedma NP). implement SLM practices 12 agreements and participate are signed in the between the maintenance of targeted NPs desert and community biodiversity. associations focusing on 4. SLM environmental applications on improvement the ground are and SLM. scaled-up. 184 subprojects (community association and microenterprise- 2 based) are supported by the project (% gender). 12 innovative SLM techniques are piloted and promoted. 8. Project management 203,500 5 500,000 10 703,500 Total Project Costs A B 4,272,300 4,788,000 9,060,300 1 List the $ by project components. The percentage is the share of GEF and Co-financing respectively of the total amount for the component. 2 TA = Technical Assistance; STA = Scientific & Technical Analysis. B. SOURCES OF CONFIRMED CO-FINANCING FOR THE PROJECT (expand the table line items as necessary) Name of Co-financier Classification Type Project %* (source) Government of Tunisia Implementing In-cash 2,400,000 50 Agency Government of Tunisia Implementing In-kind 360,000 7 Agency Beneficiary contribution Project In-Cash 368,000 8 Beneficiary French Development Bilateral In-cash 1,660,000 35 Agency Agency Total Co-financing B 100% 4,788,000 * Percentage of each co-financier’s contribution at CEO endorsement to total co-financing. C. FINANCING PLAN SUMMARY FOR THE PROJECT ($) For comparison: Project Preparation Project Total Agency Fee GEF and Co- a b c = a + b financing at PIF GEF financing 200,000 A 4,272,300 4,472,300 427,230 4,472,300 Co-financing 100,000 B 4,788,000 4,888,000 3,400,000 Total 300,000 9,060,300 9,360,300 427,230 7,872,300 D. GEF RESOURCES REQUESTED BY AGENCY(IES), FOCAL AREA(S) AND COUNTRY(IES)1 Country Name/ (in $) GEF Agency Focal Area Global Project (a) Agency Fee ( b)2 Total c=a+b World Bank Biodiversity Tunisia 2,922,300 292,230 3,214,530 World Bank Land Tunisia 1,350,000 135,000 1,485,000 Degradation Total GEF Resources 4,272,300 427,230 4,699,530 1 No need to provide information for this table if it is a single focal area, single country and single GEF Agency project. 2 Relates to the project and any previous project preparation funding that have been provided and for which no Agency fee has been requested from Trustee. 3 E. CONSULTANTS WORKING FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE COMPONENTS: Estimated GEF Co-financing Project total Component person weeks amount($) ($) ($) Local consultants* 746.6 1,155,750 269,990 1,425,740 International consultants* 0 0 0 0 Total 746.6 1,155,750 269,990 1,425,740 * Details to be provided in Annex C. F. PROJECT MANAGEMENT BUDGET/COST Total Estimated GEF Cost Items person amount Co-financing Project total weeks/months ($) ($) ($) Local consultants* 35.2 77,750 117,000 194,750 International consultants* 0 0 0 0 Office facilities, equipment, 125,750 354,125 479,875 vehicles and communications* Travel* 0 28,875 28,875 Others** 0 0 0 Total 35.2 203,500 500,000 703,500 * Details to be provided in Annex C. ** For others, it has to clearly specify what type of expenses here in a footnote. G. DOES THE PROJECT INCLUDE A “NON-GRANT” INSTRUMENT? yes no (If non-grant instruments are used, provide in Annex E an indicative calendar of expected reflows to your agency and to the GEF Trust Fund). H. DESCRIBE THE BUDGETED M &E PLAN: The Project Coordination Unit (PCU) supported by the M&E specialist, in consultation with the WB, will oversee the identification and measurement of key results indicators related to global environmental benefits (GEBs) and socioeconomic benefits. The PCU will operate an M&E system, which will facilitate monitoring of implementation progress and allow effective evaluation of project success in achieving its Project Development Objective (PDO). In this respect, the M&E system will act as a management tool by enabling the PCU, the National Steering Committee (NSC) and World Bank to assess project effectiveness during implementation and improve project performance in a targeted manner. The Project will utilize the multi-project M&E system currently being used under the World Bank-financed Second Natural Resources Management Project (PGRN2), which the General Direction for Environment and Quality of Life (DGEQV) of the Ministry of Environment (MoE), the project implementing agency, is already familiar with, as it is responsible for the M&E under one of the components of this project. Monitoring The PCU, and in particular the M&E specialist, will be responsible for the M&E of the project. The PCU will monitor the project’s PDO-level and intermediate results indicators (see Annex A), including collecting, verifying and analyzing the data received from project implementation partners, and provide a semi-annual update of these indicators to be included in the project’s semi-annual reports. The PCU will also ensure that the GEF-4 tracking tool for the Biodiversity focal area is updated at project mid-term and closing. Should a need arise, the M&E specialist 4 will be tasked to train PCU members and implementation partners. Specifically for the National Park (NP) Management Plans and small grants program, the implementation progress for these will be jointly assessed by the communities, CRDAs, and partner institution at the end of each year. The results will be consolidated on an annual basis at the regional and national levels to provide an initial assessment of project impacts. Evaluation The PCU will contract independent consultants to prepare the mid-term and end of project evaluations. The mid-term evaluation will assess the operational aspects of the project, namely progress in the completion of activities and the achievement of the PDO. The mid-term evaluation will also include recommendations for corrective measures if needed for project implementation to remain on track. The end of project evaluation will have the same scope as the mid-term review but will focus particularly on project outcomes and results at the local, regional, and national levels. The end of project evaluation will also provide recommendations in terms of M&E and replication of best practices, especially for the sustainable NP management and further ecotourism development around NPs. Terms of reference for the mid- term and end of project reviews will be included in the Project Operational Manual (POM). A summary of the M&E activities relevant to the GEF is provided below. Further information regarding the performance and impact indicators for project implementation, along with their corresponding means of verification are provided within the Project Results Framework (Annex A). Type of M&E Responsible Parties Project Budget Time frame US$ (Excluding Project Team Staff Time) Inception DGQEV 10,000 Within the first two Workshop and WB months of project Report start Measurement of The PCU supported by the M&E 25,000 Start, mid-term and project results specialist, in consultation with end of WB, will oversee the project (during identification and measurement evaluation cycle) and of key results indicators related annually as required to global environmental benefits (GEBs), and socioeconomic benefits The PCU will monitor the 30,000 Semiannually project’s PDO-level and intermediate results indicators, including collecting; verifying and analyzing the data received from project implementation partners.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tunisia Summary Strategic Environmental and Social
    PMIR Summary Strategic Environmental and Social Assessment AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP PROJECT: ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE MODERNIZATION PROJECT COUNTRY: TUNISIA SUMMARY STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT (SESA) Project Team: Mr. P. M. FALL, Transport Engineer, OITC.2 Mr. N. SAMB, Consultant Socio-Economist, OITC.2 Mr. A. KIES, Consultant Economist, OITC 2 Mr. M. KINANE, Principal Environmentalist, ONEC.3 Mr. S. BAIOD, Consultant Environmentalist ONEC.3 Project Team Sector Director: Mr. Amadou OUMAROU Regional Director: Mr. Jacob KOLSTER Division Manager: Mr. Abayomi BABALOLA 1 PMIR Summary Strategic Environmental and Social Assessment Project Name : ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE MODERNIZATION PROJECT Country : TUNISIA Project Number : P-TN-DB0-013 Department : OITC Division: OITC.2 1 Introduction This report is a summary of the Strategic Environmental and Social Assessment (SESA) of the Road Project Modernization Project 1 for improvement works in terms of upgrading and construction of road structures and primary roads of the Tunisian classified road network. This summary has been prepared in compliance with the procedures and operational policies of the African Development Bank through its Integrated Safeguards System (ISS) for Category 1 projects. The project description and rationale are first presented, followed by the legal and institutional framework in the Republic of Tunisia. A brief description of the main environmental conditions is presented, and then the road programme components are presented by their typology and by Governorate. The summary is based on the projected activities and information contained in the 60 EIAs already prepared. It identifies the key issues relating to significant impacts and the types of measures to mitigate them. It is consistent with the Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) developed to that end.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2020 Contract Pipeline
    OFFICIAL USE No Country DTM Project title and Portfolio Contract title Type of contract Procurement method Year Number 1 2021 Albania 48466 Albanian Railways SupervisionRehabilitation Contract of Tirana-Durres for Rehabilitation line and ofconstruction the Durres of- Tirana a new Railwaylink to TIA Line and construction of a New Railway Line to Tirana International Works Open 2 Albania 48466 Albanian Railways Airport Consultancy Competitive Selection 2021 3 Albania 48466 Albanian Railways Asset Management Plan and Track Access Charges Consultancy Competitive Selection 2021 4 Albania 49351 Albania Infrastructure and tourism enabling Albania: Tourism-led Model For Local Economic Development Consultancy Competitive Selection 2021 5 Albania 49351 Albania Infrastructure and tourism enabling Infrastructure and Tourism Enabling Programme: Gender and Economic Inclusion Programme Manager Consultancy Competitive Selection 2021 6 Albania 50123 Regional and Local Roads Connectivity Rehabilitation of Vlore - Orikum Road (10.6 km) Works Open 2022 7 Albania 50123 Regional and Local Roads Connectivity Upgrade of Zgosth - Ura e Cerenecit road Section (47.1km) Works Open 2022 8 Albania 50123 Regional and Local Roads Connectivity Works supervision Consultancy Competitive Selection 2021 9 Albania 50123 Regional and Local Roads Connectivity PIU support Consultancy Competitive Selection 2021 10 Albania 51908 Kesh Floating PV Project Design, build and operation of the floating photovoltaic plant located on Vau i Dejës HPP Lake Works Open 2021 11 Albania 51908
    [Show full text]
  • S.No Governorate Cities 1 L'ariana Ariana 2 L'ariana Ettadhamen-Mnihla 3 L'ariana Kalâat El-Andalous 4 L'ariana Raoued 5 L'aria
    S.No Governorate Cities 1 l'Ariana Ariana 2 l'Ariana Ettadhamen-Mnihla 3 l'Ariana Kalâat el-Andalous 4 l'Ariana Raoued 5 l'Ariana Sidi Thabet 6 l'Ariana La Soukra 7 Béja Béja 8 Béja El Maâgoula 9 Béja Goubellat 10 Béja Medjez el-Bab 11 Béja Nefza 12 Béja Téboursouk 13 Béja Testour 14 Béja Zahret Mediou 15 Ben Arous Ben Arous 16 Ben Arous Bou Mhel el-Bassatine 17 Ben Arous El Mourouj 18 Ben Arous Ezzahra 19 Ben Arous Hammam Chott 20 Ben Arous Hammam Lif 21 Ben Arous Khalidia 22 Ben Arous Mégrine 23 Ben Arous Mohamedia-Fouchana 24 Ben Arous Mornag 25 Ben Arous Radès 26 Bizerte Aousja 27 Bizerte Bizerte 28 Bizerte El Alia 29 Bizerte Ghar El Melh 30 Bizerte Mateur 31 Bizerte Menzel Bourguiba 32 Bizerte Menzel Jemil 33 Bizerte Menzel Abderrahmane 34 Bizerte Metline 35 Bizerte Raf Raf 36 Bizerte Ras Jebel 37 Bizerte Sejenane 38 Bizerte Tinja 39 Bizerte Saounin 40 Bizerte Cap Zebib 41 Bizerte Beni Ata 42 Gabès Chenini Nahal 43 Gabès El Hamma 44 Gabès Gabès 45 Gabès Ghannouch 46 Gabès Mareth www.downloadexcelfiles.com 47 Gabès Matmata 48 Gabès Métouia 49 Gabès Nouvelle Matmata 50 Gabès Oudhref 51 Gabès Zarat 52 Gafsa El Guettar 53 Gafsa El Ksar 54 Gafsa Gafsa 55 Gafsa Mdhila 56 Gafsa Métlaoui 57 Gafsa Moularès 58 Gafsa Redeyef 59 Gafsa Sened 60 Jendouba Aïn Draham 61 Jendouba Beni M'Tir 62 Jendouba Bou Salem 63 Jendouba Fernana 64 Jendouba Ghardimaou 65 Jendouba Jendouba 66 Jendouba Oued Melliz 67 Jendouba Tabarka 68 Kairouan Aïn Djeloula 69 Kairouan Alaâ 70 Kairouan Bou Hajla 71 Kairouan Chebika 72 Kairouan Echrarda 73 Kairouan Oueslatia 74 Kairouan
    [Show full text]
  • Tunisia Investment Plan
    Republic of Tunisia FOREST INVESTMENT PROGRAM IN TUNISIA 1. Independent Review of the FIP Tunisia 2. Matrix: Responses to comments and remarks of the independent expert November 2016 Ministère de l’Agriculture, des Direction Ressources Hydrauliques et de Générale des la Pêche Forêts 1 CONTENTS _______________________ I. Independent Review of the Forest Investment Plan of Tunisia 3 II. Matrix: Response to comments and remarks of the independent expert 25 2 I. Independent Review of the Forest Investment Plan of Tunisia Reviewer: Marjory-Anne Bromhead Date of review: (first draft review, 18th August 2016) PART I: Setting the context (from the reviewers overall understanding of the FIP document) Tunisia is the first country in North Africa and the Middle East to benefit from FIP support1, and provides an important example of a country where climate change mitigation and climate resilience go hand in hand. Tunisia is largely “forest poor”, with forests concentrated in the high rainfall areas in the north and North West of the country and covering only 5 percent of the territory (definitions vary). However rangelands are more widespread, covering 27 percent of the land area and are also a source of rural livelihoods and carbon sequestration, while both forests and rangelands are key to broader watershed management (Tunisia is water-scarce). Tunisia, together with the North Africa and Middle East region more broadly, is one of the regions most affected by climate change, with higher temperatures, more periods of extreme heat and more erratic rainfall. REDD actions will help to control erosion and conserve soil moisture and fertility, increasing climate resilience, while also reducing the country’s carbon footprint; the two benefits go hand in hand.
    [Show full text]
  • South Tunisian Gas Pipeline (STGP) Project COUNTRY: Tunisia
    INDEPENDENT REVIEW MECHANISM Compliance Review and Mediation Unit SPOT-CHECK ADVISORY REVIEW OF PROJECT COMPLIANCE REPORT PROJECT: South Tunisian Gas Pipeline (STGP) Project COUNTRY: Tunisia DECEMBER 2018 ACKNOWLEGMENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Director of the Compliance Review and Mediation Unit (BCRM) and the Roster of Experts of the Independent Review Mechanism (IRM) would like to acknowledge the valuable support they received from the project sponsor, Entreprise Tunisienne d’Activités Pétrolières (ETAP); the project operator, OMV Aktiengesellschaft; the Management and staff of the African Development Bank Group (AfDB); the government ministries; and the local authorities in the project area. This support has been invaluable in facilitating the Spot-Check Advisory Review of Project Compliance of the South Tunisian Gas Pipeline (STGP) Project, which is the subject of this Report. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEGMENTS ............................................................................................................................................... I TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................................................. II ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................................ III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... V KEY FINDINGS
    [Show full text]
  • La Liste De La Codification Normalisée Des Agences Bancaires En 2018
    APTBEF/SLF 26/07/2019 La liste de la codification Normalisée des succursales de la BCT, des agences Bancaires et des centres d'exploitation régionaux des C.C.P EN 2018 1 Succursales de la Banque Centrale de Tunisie Date Code Succursales Gouvernorat ADRESSE Tél Fax Mail Responsable d'ouverture BCT Tunis Tunis 03/11/1958 25, Rue Hédi Nouira 024 71 122 708 71 254 675 [email protected] Malek DISS Bizerte Bizerte 03/11/1958 Rue Mongi Slim 025 72 431 056 72 431 366 [email protected] Nawel BEN JABALLAH Gabès Gabès 15/09/1980 1, Avenue Mohamed Ali 026 75 271 477 75 274 541 [email protected] Najla Missaoui Nabeul Nabeul 19/01/1979 Rue Taïeb M'Hiri 027 72 286 823 72 287 049 [email protected] Lotfi Dougaz Mohamed Habib Sfax Sfax 03/11/1958 Avenue de la Liberté 14 Janvier 2011 028 74 400 500 74 401 900 [email protected] MASMOUDI Sousse Sousse 03/11/1958 Place Farhat Hached 029 73 225 144 73 225 031 [email protected] Ali Kitar Gafsa Gafsa 11/03/1985 4, Avenue de l'Environnement 030 76 224 500 76 224 900 [email protected] Ali Ben Salem Kasserine Kasserine 07/04/1986 1, Avenue de la Révolution 14 Janvier 2011 031 77 474 352 77 473 811 [email protected] Cherif Amayra Kairouan Kairouan 22/02/1988 1, Rue Beit Al Hikma 032 77 233 777 77 235 844 [email protected] Ali Riahi Médenine Médenine 05/09/1988 8, Avenue Habib Bourguiba 033 75 642 244 75 642 245 [email protected] Ajmi Bellil Jendouba Jendouba 21/08/1989 Rue Abou El Kacem Chebbi 034 78 603 058 78 603 435 [email protected] Brahim Kouki Monastir Monastir 21/05/1990 Rue des Martyrs 035 73 464 200 73 464 203 [email protected] Mohamed Selmi 2 ARAB TUNISIAN BANK Code BIC: ATBKTNTT Date Code Agences GOUVERNORAT ADRESSE Tél.
    [Show full text]
  • A Participatory Agrobiodiversity Conservation Approach in the Oases: Community Actions for the Promotion of Sustainable Development in Fragile Areas
    diversity Article A Participatory Agrobiodiversity Conservation Approach in the Oases: Community Actions for the Promotion of Sustainable Development in Fragile Areas Cristiana Peano 1,2 , Stefania Caron 1, Mohamed Mahfoudhi 3, Khouloud Zammel 3, Houda Zaidi 3 and Francesco Sottile 4,* 1 Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali, Alimentari, Università di Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini, 1, 10195 Grugliasco, TO, Italy; [email protected] (C.P.); [email protected] (S.C.) 2 UNESCO Chair in Sustainable Development and Territory Management, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy 3 Association Persone Come Noi Tunisie, Route de Gafsa, El Hamma du Jérid, Tozeur 2214, Tunisia; [email protected] (M.M.); [email protected] (K.Z.); [email protected] (H.Z.) 4 Dipartimento di Architettura, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Centro di Conservazione della Biodiversità di Interesse Agrario, Viale delle Scienze, Edificio 14, 90128 Palermo, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-091-2386-1200 Abstract: Rural development policies today include significant directions towards ecological tran- sition and sustainability. Biodiversity plays a fundamental role, especially in fragile environments. The North African oases, for example, are socio-ecological structures with delicate balances in terms of natural resources, where the activation of participatory conservation approaches appears today to Citation: Peano, C.; Caron, S.; be very useful, aiming at long-lasting results. This type of approach was applied in the oasis of El Mahfoudhi, M.; Zammel, K.; Zaidi, Hamma, in Tunisia. The socio-ecological analysis was carried out through semi-structured interviews H.; Sottile, F. A Participatory with different stakeholders of the oasis.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical and Epidemiological Characteristics of Patients
    arch and se D e e v R f e l o o Bargaoui et al., J Res Development 2018, 6:2 l p a m n r e DOI: 10.4172/2311-3278.1000165 n u t o J Journal of Research and Development ISSN: 2311-3278 Research Article Open Access Clinical and Epidemiological Characteristics of Patients Presenting with Cutaneous Leishmaniasis to the General Practice Departments (Outbreak; Tozeur, Tunisia, 2016) Managing Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Outbreak in General Medicine (Tozeur, Tunisia, 2016) Sawssen Bargaoui1, Hela Abroug2, Manel Ben Fredj2, Imen Zemni2, Sana Bhiri2, MoniaYoussef3 and Asma Sriha Belguith2* 1Discipline of Family Medicine, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia 2Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University Hospital of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia 3Department of Dermatology, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia Abstract Background: We aimed at describing, by an active investigation, an outbreak of Cutaneous Leshmaniasis (CL) occurred in Dghoumes, an area near a natural reserve (NR), with high animal density and low economic level, in south Tunisia. Methods: we performed a prospective study, from September 2015 to August 2016. All cases with confirmed diagnoses of CL were included (n=173). Results: Median age was 15 years (IQR: 5-34). Outbreak covered six months. We notified a density of 34 cases per 100 Km2 during outbreak. The Annual attack rate (AAR) of CL was 6.06 cases /1000 inh. Among children under 5 and, "Dghoumes" inhabitants AARs reached respectively 14.46 and 23.94 per 1000 inh. The risk of developing CL for inhabitant near NR was 21 folds higher than in other distant region.
    [Show full text]
  • Cadre-De-Reinstallation.Pdf
    République de Tunisie Public Disclosure Authorized _____________________________ Ministère des Affaires locales et de l’Environnement (MALE) ________________________________________________ Projet de Gestion durable des Paysages oasiens en Tunisie Public Disclosure Authorized Projet WAHA (P169995) ____________ Cadre de Reinstallation (CR) Public Disclosure Authorized Document préparé par l’Equipe de préparation du Projet WAHA du Ministère des Affaires locales et de l’Environnement Public Disclosure Authorized 1 octobre 2019 CADRE DE REINSTALLATION (CR) Table des matières Liste des principaux acronymes et abréviations .........................................................................iv RESUME ...................................................................................................................................vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ xiv I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 I.1 Objectif du Cadre de politique de réinstallation (CPR) .............................................................. 1 I.3 Méthodologie ............................................................................................................................. 1 II.4 Calendrier .................................................................................................................................. 2 II. DESCRIPTION DU PROJET .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Carthage Was the Center Or Capital City of the Ancient Carthaginian
    Carthage was the center or capital city of the ancient Carthaginian civilization, on the eastern side of the Lake of Tunis in what is now the Tunis Governorate in Tunisia. Carthage was widely considered the most important trading hub of the Ancient Mediterranean and was arguably one of the most affluent cities of the Ancient World. The city developed from a Phoenician colony into the capital of a Punic empire which dominated large parts of the Southwest Mediterranean during the first millennium BC. The legendary Queen Dido is regarded as the founder of the city, though her historicity has been questioned. The ancient Carthage city was destroyed by the Roman Republic in the Third Punic War in 146 BC and then re-developed as Roman Carthage, which became the major city of the Roman Empire in the province of Africa. The city was sacked and destroyed by Umayyad forces after the Battle of Carthage in 698 to prevent it from being reconquered by the Byzantine Empire. It remained occupied during the Muslim period and was used as a fort by the Muslims until the Hafsid period when it was taken by the Crusaders with its inhabitants massacred during the Eighth Crusade. Catheral of St. Vincent de Paul: is a Roman Catholic church located in Tunis, Tunisia. The cathedral is dedicated to Saint Vincent de Paul, patron saint of charity. It is the episcopal see of the Archdiocese of Tunis and is situated at Place de l'Indépendence in Ville Nouvelle, a crossroads between Avenue Habib Bourguiba and Avenue de France, opposite the French embassy.
    [Show full text]
  • II International Open Meeting
    IOBC/WPRS Working Group "Fruit Flies of Economic Importance" OILB/SROP Groupe de Travail "Mouches des Fruits d'lmportance Economique" and lnstituto de lnvestiga�lo Cientifica Tropical II International Open Meeting at/ a Lisbon, Portugal 22 -24 September 1997 Edited by J. Piedade-Guerreiro IOBC / wprs Bulletin Bulletin OILB / srop Vol. 20(8)1997 The IOBC/WPRS Bulletin is published by the International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants, West Palaearctic Regional Section (IOBC/WPRS) Le Bulletin OILB/SROP est publie par !'Organisation lntemationale de Lutte Biologique et lntegree contra les Animaux et les Plantes Nuisibles, section Regionale Quest Palearctique (OILB/SROP) Copyright IOBC/WPRS 1997 Address General Secretariat: !NRA - Centre de Recherches de Dijon Laboratoire de Recherches sur la Flore Pathogene dans le sol 17, Rue Sully - BV 1540 F-21034 DIJON CEDEX France ISBN 92-9067-093-2 6'II INTERNATIONAL OPEN MEETING" "WORKING GROUP "FRUIT FLY OF ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE" Reunion Pleniere du Groupe de Travail "Mooches des Fruits d'lmportance Economique" � -·-·-"·CIMIAM Tropical � INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGA<;AOCIENTIFICA TROPICAL ORGANISAT. INTERNAT. DE LUTTE BIOLOGIQUE ET INTEGREE SECTION REGIONALE OUEST PALEARCTIQUE OILB- SROP 22, 23 e 24 de Setembro de 1997 Lisboa - Portugal - i - Foreword The enormous spreading and the increasing losses due to fruit flies of economic importance all over the world and particularly in the Mediterranean Region, lead the InternationalOrganization for Biological Control/ West Paleartic Regional section to mobilize it's means for the implementation of actions that enable the controlof these pests. In this context the IOBC/WPRS Working Group "Fruit Flies ofEconomic Importance" organized the "II International Open Meeting", under the high patronages of the Instituto de Investigayao CientificaTropical (IICT) and the mentioned InternationalOrganization.
    [Show full text]
  • Caractérisation De La Dynamique Des Oasis De Djérid Cherine Ben Khalfallah
    Caractérisation de la dynamique des oasis de Djérid Cherine Ben Khalfallah To cite this version: Cherine Ben Khalfallah. Caractérisation de la dynamique des oasis de Djérid. Autre. Université Montpellier; Université de Tunis El Manar, 2019. Français. NNT : 2019MONTG010. tel-02166271 HAL Id: tel-02166271 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02166271 Submitted on 26 Jun 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSE POUR OBTENIR LE GRADE DE DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTPELLIER En Géosciences École doctorale GAIA Unité de recherche UMR ESPACE-DEV En partenariat international avec l’Université de TUNIS EL MANAR, Tunisie Caractérisation de la dynamique des oasis de Djérid (Tunisie) par télédétection Présentée par Cherine BEN KHALFALLAH Le 12 mars 2019 Sous la codirection de Frédérique SEYLER et de Fadila DARRAGI Devant le jury composé de Vincent CHAPLOT, Directeur de recherche, IRD (France) Président Luc DESCROIX, Directeur de recherche, IRD (France) Rapporteur Mohamed OUESSAR, Maître de Conférences (HDR), IRA (Tunisie) Rapporteur Zohra
    [Show full text]