Botanical Names for Plants
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Botanical Nomenclature: Concept, History of Botanical Nomenclature
Module – 15; Content writer: AvishekBhattacharjee Module 15: Botanical Nomenclature: Concept, history of botanical nomenclature (local and scientific) and its advantages, formation of code. Content writer: Dr.AvishekBhattacharjee, Central National Herbarium, Botanical Survey of India, P.O. – B. Garden, Howrah – 711 103. Module – 15; Content writer: AvishekBhattacharjee Botanical Nomenclature:Concept – A name is a handle by which a mental image is passed. Names are just labels we use to ensure we are understood when we communicate. Nomenclature is a mechanism for unambiguous communication about the elements of taxonomy. Botanical Nomenclature, i.e. naming of plants is that part of plant systematics dealing with application of scientific names to plants according to some set rules. It is related to, but distinct from taxonomy. A botanical name is a unique identifier to which information of a taxon can be attached, thus enabling the movement of data across languages, scientific disciplines, and electronic retrieval systems. A plant’s name permits ready summarization of information content of the taxon in a nested framework. A systemofnamingplantsforscientificcommunicationmustbe international inscope,andmustprovideconsistencyintheapplicationof names.Itmustalsobeacceptedbymost,ifnotall,membersofthe scientific community. These criteria led, almost inevitably, to International Botanical Congresses (IBCs) being the venue at which agreement on a system of scientific nomenclature for plants was sought. The IBCs led to publication of different ‘Codes’ which embodied the rules and regulations of botanical nomenclature and the decisions taken during these Congresses. Advantages ofBotanical Nomenclature: Though a common name may be much easier to remember, there are several good reasons to use botanical names for plant identification. Common names are not unique to a specific plant. -
The Nature of Naming What’S in a Name?
The Nature of Naming What’s in a Name? • "A rose is a rose," it has been said • And most of us know a rose when we see one • As we know the African marigolds • Maples, elms, cedars, and pines that shade our backyards and line our streets What’s in a Name? • We usually call these plants by their common names • But if we wanted to know more about the cedar tree in our front yard, we would find that "cedar" may refer to: – Eastern red cedar What’s in a Name? • Incense cedar What’s in a Name? • Western red cedar What’s in a Name? • Atlantic white cedar What’s in a Name? • Spanish cedar What’s in a Name? • Biblical Lebanon cedar What’s in a Name? • In fact, we would find that cedars are found in three separate plant families What’s in a Name? • Later, after discovering that our "African" marigolds are in fact from Mexico and our "Spanish" cedar originated in the West Indies, we would realize how misleading the common names of plants can be. What’s in a Name? • The same plant can have many different common names – European white lily has at least 245 – Marsh marigold has at least 280 What’s in a Name? • Clearly, if we use only the common name of a plant, we cannot be sure of understanding very much about that plant Classification • It is for this reason that the scientific community prefers to use a more precise way of naming, or classification • Scientific classification, however, is more than just naming: it is a key to understanding • Botanists name a plant to give it a unique place in the biological world, as well as to clarify its relationships within that world How Are Plants Classified? • Science classifies living things in an orderly system through which they can be easily identified – Categories of increasing size, based upon relationships within those categories How Are Plants Classified? • For example, all plants can be put in order from the more primitive to the more advanced. -
Towards Resolving Lamiales Relationships
Schäferhoff et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2010, 10:352 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/352 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Towards resolving Lamiales relationships: insights from rapidly evolving chloroplast sequences Bastian Schäferhoff1*, Andreas Fleischmann2, Eberhard Fischer3, Dirk C Albach4, Thomas Borsch5, Günther Heubl2, Kai F Müller1 Abstract Background: In the large angiosperm order Lamiales, a diverse array of highly specialized life strategies such as carnivory, parasitism, epiphytism, and desiccation tolerance occur, and some lineages possess drastically accelerated DNA substitutional rates or miniaturized genomes. However, understanding the evolution of these phenomena in the order, and clarifying borders of and relationships among lamialean families, has been hindered by largely unresolved trees in the past. Results: Our analysis of the rapidly evolving trnK/matK, trnL-F and rps16 chloroplast regions enabled us to infer more precise phylogenetic hypotheses for the Lamiales. Relationships among the nine first-branching families in the Lamiales tree are now resolved with very strong support. Subsequent to Plocospermataceae, a clade consisting of Carlemanniaceae plus Oleaceae branches, followed by Tetrachondraceae and a newly inferred clade composed of Gesneriaceae plus Calceolariaceae, which is also supported by morphological characters. Plantaginaceae (incl. Gratioleae) and Scrophulariaceae are well separated in the backbone grade; Lamiaceae and Verbenaceae appear in distant clades, while the recently described Linderniaceae are confirmed to be monophyletic and in an isolated position. Conclusions: Confidence about deep nodes of the Lamiales tree is an important step towards understanding the evolutionary diversification of a major clade of flowering plants. The degree of resolution obtained here now provides a first opportunity to discuss the evolution of morphological and biochemical traits in Lamiales. -
Pollen Morphology of Plantago Species Native to Poland and Their Taxonomic Implications
Vol. 73, No. 4: 315-325, 2004 ACTA SOCIETATIS BOTANICORUM POLONIAE 315 POLLEN MORPHOLOGY OF PLANTAGO SPECIES NATIVE TO POLAND AND THEIR TAXONOMIC IMPLICATIONS MA£GORZATA KLIMKO1, KRYSTYNA IDZIKOWSKA2, MARIOLA TRUCHAN3, ANNA KREFT3 1 Department of Botany, Agricultural University Wojska Polskiego 71C, 60-625 Poznañ, Poland e-mail: [email protected] 2 Laboratory of Electron Microscopy, Adam Mickiewicz University Grunwaldzka 6, 70-780 Poznañ, Poland 3 Department of Botany and Genetics, Institute of Biology and Environmental Protection, Pomeranian Pedagogical University Arciszewskiego 22B, 76-200 S³upsk, Poland (Received: March 29, 2004. Accepted: May 21, 2004) ABSTRACT Pollen grains of 9 species of the genus Plantago (Plantaginaceae), including 8 taxa native to Poland, were ob- served under a light microscope and a scanning electron microscope. Descriptions of grain sculpture are illustra- ted only SEM micrographs. The studied pollen grains were medium-sized or small, spherical or prolate spheroi- dal. Their sculpture was always verrucate with granulation. In the studied taxa, internal apertures had the form of pores. Their number ranged from (4)5-9(14). The pores were scattered on the surface of pollen grains. Identifica- tion features of individual taxa include: presence or absence of an annulus around each pore, annulus structure, ornamentation of the pollen grain and operculum, type of aperture membrane, number of internal pores, and pore diameter. We suggest that two new pollen grain types, characteristic of P. intermedia and P. arenaria, should be distinguished, and that P. alpina should be assigned to the P. coronopus type. KEY WORDS: Plantaginaceae, Plantago, pollen morphology, SEM. INTRODUCTION the sporophyte, whereas pollen size is determined both by sporophytic and gametophytic genotypes (Bedinger 1992; Pollen grains of the genus Plantago (Plantaginaceae) ha- McCormic 1993; Nepi et al. -
Common Ground and Differences Between Spirulina and Chlorella Spirulina
Common ground and differences between Spirulina and Chlorella Spirulina: Spirulina platensis microalgae belong to the most pre- cious alkaline natural substances of our time. In a concentrated natural form they provide more than Attributes Chlorella pyrenoidosa Spirulina platensis 50 vital substances for human beings and animals. In all eras they have been used as a supplement food, e. g. in Botanical name • Chlorella pyrenoidosa • Spirulina platensis previous ancient cultures of the Maya and Aztec. Species • green algae (Chlorophyta) • blue algae (Cyanobacteria) Conditions of growth • in fresh-water • in very alkaline soda-water • estimated age: approx. 3.1 billion years (pH-value 9 - 11) • natural sources: shallow, mineral rich lakes, in Microscopic pictures tropical or subtropical climes, e.g. Africa, South- America India, China, Taiwan, Japan • global use: as food and in food, as a food supplement, as animal feed, especially for ornamental fish, birds, and small animals, as a cosmetic agent Cell form characteristic • Protozoa, round • Protozoa in a thread-shaped compound, spiral Cell wall • cellulose with sporopollenin, of which it is • easily digestible polysaccharides, which said to have a heavy metal binding takes care of good digestibility and Chlorella: quality a good bioavailability of all vital substances Cell nucleus • with cell nucleus • no cell nucleus, free spiral DNA Chlorella probably has the highest chlorophyll content in the plant kingdom. From there it gets its neme which means „little greenness“. Nutrient characteristics • rich in nutrients, with over 50 vital substan- • rich in nutrients with over 50 vital substances Chlorophyll is an important oxidant carrier and is also cal- ces and all 8 essential amino acids and all 8 essential amino acids led „treasured up sunlight“. -
Worksheet-2B.Pdf
WHAT’S SO IMPORTANT ABOUT NAMES? Topics Covered: Classificaon and taxonomy Understanding the importance of Linnaeus’s contribuon to science Making and using keys What’s in a name? Giving something a name allows us to talk about it. Names are important not only for people, but also for the plants we culvate in our gardens. In the early days of botany (the 17th and early 18th centuries) plants were given long Lan phrases for names that described their parcular features. As more plants became known, names tended to become longer, and much more difficult to remember and use. Then, in the 18th century, a Swedish biologist named Carl Linnaeus developed and popularised a two‐name (binomial) system for all plant species—GENUS and SPECIES. His system is sll in use today. A useful definion GENUS: A group of organisms SPECIES: that have certain characteriscs in of a species is a group of organisms common but can be divided further which can interbreed to produce into other groups (i.e. into species) ferle offspring Binomial names The use of only two words (the binomial name) made it much easier to categorise and compare different plants and animals. Imagine, for instance, talking about a type of geranium using the old name: Geranium pedunculis bifloris, caule dichotomo erecto, foliis quinquepars incisis; summis sessilibus The binomial name is much easier to use: Geranium maculatum 1 WHAT’S SO IMPORTANT ABOUT NAMES? Who was Carl Linnaeus? Carl Linnaeus (1707–1778) was born and brought up in and around Råshult, in the countryside of southern Sweden. -
Life-Forms of Terrestrial 'Flowering Plants
ACTA PHYTOGEOGRAPHICA SUECICA EDIDJT SVENSKA VAXTGEOGRAFISKA SALLSKAPET m:1 LIFE-FORMS OF TERRESTRIAL ' FLOWERING PLANTS I BY G. EINAR Du RIETZ UPPSALA 1931 ALMQVIST & WIKSELLS BOKTRYCKERI AB ' ACTA PHYTOGEOGRAPHICA SUECICA. III. LIFE-FORMS OF TERRESTRIAL FLOWERING PLANTS BY G. EINAR DU RIETZ PRINTED WITH CONTRIBUTION FH.OM LA :\GMAN S KA I{ U LTU HFON DEN UPPSALA 193 1 ALMQVIST & WIKSELLS BOK'l'RYCKERI-A.-B. Preface. This work is the result of studies carried out during the last twelve years. The field-studies have been made partly in various parts of Scandinavia (Sweden and Norway), partly during a year's work in New Zealand and .Australia in 1926-1927 as well as during shorter visits to various parts of Central and Western Europe, North America, and Java. The material collected in the field has been worked up in the Plant-Biological Institution of Upsala Uni versity. The rich life-form collections of this institution have also been utilized as much as possible. I wish to express my deep gratitude to all those frien�s in various countries who have supported my work in one way or another - they are too many to be enumerated here. l have tried to bring the names of the plants mentioned as much as possible into accordance with the following generally known :florjstic handbooks : For Scandinavia Ho LMBERG 1922-1926, and, for the groups not treated there, LIND- 1\IAN 1926, for Central Europe HEGI 1908--1931, for the eastern part of North .America RoBINSON and FF.RNALD 1908, for Java KooR DERS 191 1-1912, for N�w South Wales MooRE and BE T C H E 1893, for the rest of Australia BENTHAM 1863- 1878, and for New Zealand CHEESEMAN 1925. -
The Herb Society of America, Inc. Style Manual
The Herb Society of America, Inc. Style Manual 2020 Revision 11-4-19 Final Draft Approved May 2020 The Herb Society of America (The Society or HSA) actively works to disseminate knowledge about herbs. The Society has developed its own style guide, based on such major references as The Chicago Manual of Style: The Essential Guide for Writers, Editors, and Publishers and Council of Science Editors (CSE), Scientific Style and Format: The CSE Manual for Authors, Editors, and Publishers. This manual presents a concise format of the accepted usage of terms that are often found in all official HSA publications. This guide is not intended to be an exhaustive reference for HSA authors, but it is hoped the information here will answer most questions for those writing for HSA publications. The general editorial rules that apply today favor fewer of many things than applied in the past. That means punctuation only when necessary to avoid misreading, and capitalization in many fewer instances than in the past. In addition, we request that authors use active voice rather than passive voice. If you have questions which are not answered by this guide, please contact HSA Headquarters at 440-256-0514. Authors submitting articles for a specific publication, e.g., The Herbarist, newsletters, or the blog, should consult the Guidelines for Authors under the submissions tab on the publications section of the website. 2 GENERAL FORMATTING GUIDELINES For consistency and ease of editing and processing, HSA requests that authors format their contributions utilizing the guidelines below. While manuscripts submitted to The Herbarist or lengthy herbal essential guides will benefit from all the guidelines, book reviews, newsletter articles, and brief notes may not use the entire list. -
History of Taxonomy
History of Taxonomy The history of taxonomy dates back to the origin of human language. Western scientific taxonomy started in Greek some hundred years BC and are here divided into prelinnaean and postlinnaean. The most important works are cited and the progress of taxonomy (with the focus on botanical taxonomy) are described up to the era of the Swedish botanist Carl Linnaeus, who founded modern taxonomy. The development after Linnaeus is characterized by a taxonomy that increasingly have come to reflect the paradigm of evolution. The used characters have extended from morphological to molecular. Nomenclatural rules have developed strongly during the 19th and 20th century, and during the last decade traditional nomenclature has been challenged by advocates of the Phylocode. Mariette Manktelow Dept of Systematic Biology Evolutionary Biology Centre Uppsala University Norbyv. 18D SE-752 36 Uppsala E-mail: [email protected] 1. Pre-Linnaean taxonomy 1.1. Earliest taxonomy Taxonomy is as old as the language skill of mankind. It has always been essential to know the names of edible as well as poisonous plants in order to communicate acquired experiences to other members of the family and the tribe. Since my profession is that of a systematic botanist, I will focus my lecture on botanical taxonomy. A taxonomist should be aware of that apart from scientific taxonomy there is and has always been folk taxonomy, which is of great importance in, for example, ethnobiological studies. When we speak about ancient taxonomy we usually mean the history in the Western world, starting with Romans and Greek. However, the earliest traces are not from the West, but from the East. -
Ethnomedicinal Importance of Pteridophytes Used by Chenchus of Nallamalais, Andhra Pradesh, India
Ethnobotanical Leaflets 11: 6-10. 2007. Ethnomedicinal Importance of Pteridophytes used by Chenchus of Nallamalais, Andhra Pradesh, India K. Thulsi Rao1, K.N. Reddy2, C. Pattanaik3 & Ch. Sudhakar Reddy3 1Biodiversity Research Centre, Project Tiger, Srisailam, Andhra Pradesh – 518102. India. 2Plant Taxonomy Division, Laila Impex Research Centre, Unit-I, Phase-III, Jawahar Autonagar, Vijayawada-520 007, India. 3Forestry & Ecology Division, National Remote Sensing Agency, Balanagar, Hyderabad -500 037, India. *Corresponding author Email: [email protected] Issued 20 January 2007 Abstract The present study focuses specifically on the ethnomedicinal importance of 15 species of Pteridophytes, used by Chenchu tribes occurring in Nallamalais of Andhra Pradesh, India. The botanical name, family name, vernacular name, habit, habitat and their ethnomedicinal uses are provided. Key words: Pteridophytes, Chenchus, Nallamalais, Andhra Pradesh. Introduction Nallamalais are range of parallel hills of the Eastern Ghats, located south of the Krishna river in southern part of Andhra Pradesh state, India. They are renowned for being rich in biodiversity and their total length is about 430 kms; the northern boundary is in the Palnad Basin, and the southern boundary is in the Seshachalam Hills (Rao. 1998). The Chenchus are a Telugu speaking (originally chenchu language of Dravidian style) food-gathering tribe, living in the Nallamala forests, spread over the districts of Mahabubnagar, Kurnool, Prakasam, Nalgonda and Guntur. They are a conservative tribal group and have not made many changes in their lifestyle or tried to adapt to modernity. They live in the enclosed space and geography, leading a life of an unbroken continuity. The Chenchus are undaunted by their natural surroundings and set out to gather food or hunt animals. -
The Linderniaceae and Gratiolaceae Are Further Lineages Distinct from the Scrophulariaceae (Lamiales)
Research Paper 1 The Linderniaceae and Gratiolaceae are further Lineages Distinct from the Scrophulariaceae (Lamiales) R. Rahmanzadeh1, K. Müller2, E. Fischer3, D. Bartels1, and T. Borsch2 1 Institut für Molekulare Physiologie und Biotechnologie der Pflanzen, Universität Bonn, Kirschallee 1, 53115 Bonn, Germany 2 Nees-Institut für Biodiversität der Pflanzen, Universität Bonn, Meckenheimer Allee 170, 53115 Bonn, Germany 3 Institut für Integrierte Naturwissenschaften ± Biologie, Universität Koblenz-Landau, Universitätsstraûe 1, 56070 Koblenz, Germany Received: July 14, 2004; Accepted: September 22, 2004 Abstract: The Lamiales are one of the largest orders of angio- Traditionally, Craterostigma, Lindernia and their relatives have sperms, with about 22000 species. The Scrophulariaceae, as been treated as members of the family Scrophulariaceae in the one of their most important families, has recently been shown order Lamiales (e.g., Takhtajan,1997). Although it is well estab- to be polyphyletic. As a consequence, this family was re-classi- lished that the Plocospermataceae and Oleaceae are their first fied and several groups of former scrophulariaceous genera branching families (Bremer et al., 2002; Hilu et al., 2003; Soltis now belong to different families, such as the Calceolariaceae, et al., 2000), little is known about the evolutionary diversifica- Plantaginaceae, or Phrymaceae. In the present study, relation- tion of most of the orders diversity. The Lamiales branching ships of the genera Craterostigma, Lindernia and its allies, hith- above the Plocospermataceae and Oleaceae are called ªcore erto classified within the Scrophulariaceae, were analyzed. Se- Lamialesº in the following text. The most recent classification quences of the chloroplast trnK intron and the matK gene by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG2, 2003) recognizes (~ 2.5 kb) were generated for representatives of all major line- 20 families. -
Plantago Media L.—Explored and Potential Applications of an Underutilized Plant
plants Review Plantago media L.—Explored and Potential Applications of an Underutilized Plant Radu Claudiu Fierascu 1,2, Irina Fierascu 1,3,* , Alina Ortan 3 and Alina Paunescu 4 1 National Institute for Research & Development in Chemistry and Petrochemistry—ICECHIM, 060021 Bucharest, Romania; fi[email protected] 2 Department of Science and Engineering of Oxide Materials and Nanomaterials, University “Politehnica” of Bucharest, 011061 Bucharest, Romania 3 University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, 011464 Bucharest, Romania; [email protected] 4 Department of Natural Sciences, University of Pitesti, 1 Targu din Vale Str., Pitesti, 110040 Arges, Romania; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The search of valuable natural compounds should be directed towards alternative vegetal resources, and to the re-discovery of underutilized plants. Belonging to the Plantaginaceae family, the hoary plantain (Plantago media L.) represents one of the lesser studied species from the Plantago genus. The literature study revealed the under-utilization of the hoary plantain, a surprising aspect, considering its widespread. If the composition of Plantago media L. is rather well established, its applications are not nearly studied as for other Plantago species. The goal of the present paper is to summarize the findings regarding the applications of P. media, and, having as starting point the applications of related species, to propose new emerging areas of research, such as the biomedical applications validation through in vivo assays, and the evaluation of its potential towards indus- trial applications (i.e., development of food or personal care products), pisciculture or zootechny, phytoremediation and other environmental protection applications, or in the nanotechnology area Citation: Fierascu, R.C.; Fierascu, I.; (materials phytosynthesis).