DOCSLIB.ORG

Weedbusters! Recording Form

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Weedbusters! Recording Form Appendix 1: Volunteer invasive plant recording sheet Your name: Date: Weedbusters! Recording form Species: Surveyed? Yes / No Buds Open Seeds Flowering? Ripe Unripe flowers present? Control Hand-pulling Digging Herbicide techniques: Disposal: Left on site Incineration Other: How many people How much Survey: involved? time did you Control: spend? No. of individual Did you take Population Size plants or stems photographs? 1 m X m 2 m X m 3 m X m 4 _ m X m 5 m X m If possible, please include a GPS reading (in decimal degrees, WGS1984) Population Location details or other notes 1 2 3 4 5 Appendix 2: Eradication effort scoring system Stage 1: Decision tree, adapted from Panetta & Timmins 2004 Areas of relevance to the prioritisation used here are highlighted in red Stage 2: Calculation of eradication impedance scores, adapted from Panetta & Timmins 2004 Category Score Explanation 1 Number of populations 0 Only 1 population known 3 2 or 3 populations known 6 >3 populations known 2 Ease of access 0 All populations accessible by road 3 Some populations only accessed off-road or on islands served by the FIG Air Service 6 Some populations on remote islands not served by the FIG Air Service 3. Length of conspicuous 0 Small populations (c. 1m square) detectable from >100m stage in most habitats for more than 3 months 3 Small populations detectable 1-3 months 6 Small populations detectable <1 month 12 Small populations never easily detectable 4. Conspicuous stage prior 0 Plant is conspicuous before reproduction or plant does not to reproduction produce propagules 3 Plant is not conspicuous before reproduction 5. Distinctive features 0 Plants have distinctive features 3 Plants may be easily confused with similar more common species 6. Vegetative 0 Plants never or rarely reproduce by vegetative fragmentation fragmentation 3 Plants frequently reproduce by vegetative fragmentation 7. Time to first 0 Plants mature after >2 yrs reproduction 2 Plants mature in 2nd year 4 Plants mature in 1st year 6 >1 generation per year 8. Longevity of seedbank 0 Transient <1 year; or plants not known to produce propagules in the Falklands 2 Short-term persistent 1-5 yrs 4 Long-term persistent 5-20 yrs 6 Seedbank >20 yrs 9. Number of controls Number of controls estimated to be needed to kill the most persistent individuals 10. Propagule dispersal 0 All dispersal to new sites is likely to be via anthropogenic vectors, including via livestock 3 Dispersal to new sites likely via both anthropogenic and natural vectors 6 Dispersal to new sites likely to be via natural vectors, especially birds or wind. Notes on the calculation of eradication impedance scores 1. Number of populations Where complete data were unavailable, number of populations was estimated as being equal to the number of 1km grid squares the species is known to be present in. 4. Conspicuous stage prior to reproduction Note that this is largely confounded with the score for length of conspicuous stage, as a score of 3 is applicable for all species scoring 12 for length of conspicuous stage, but is applicable for only 1 species scoring less than 12. 6. Vegetative fragmentation This character may be more significant for aquatic species which are frequently invasive. However, no introduced aquatic species have yet been reported from the Falklands. Only three species score 3 for this question. 8. Longevity of seedbank Data are not available from the Falklands, so data from the Ecological Flora of the British Isles (http://www.ecoflora.co.uk) were used. Where data were unavailable, annual or biennial species were scored 4 and perennial species were scored 2. Calculation of net area Detailed data on the net area of infestation were only available for a few species. Where data were absent, an estimate was made based on either the author’s knowledge of any sites he had visited, or on a conservative figure of 0.01 ha for each 1km grid square the species had been recorded in. Eradication effort scores for weed species uction Eradication Net I x A = impedance Area Eradication Family Species Common name (I) (A) Effort (E) Risk Risk assessment Number of populations Ease of access Length of conspicuous stage Conspicuous prior to reproduction Distinctive features Vegetative fragmentation Time to first reprod Longevity of seedbank Number of controls Propagule dispersal Amaranthaceae Atriplex prostrata Common Orache 12 0 0 12 3 3 0 4 4 1 0 27 0.01 0.27 Apiaceae Anthriscus cf. sylvestris Cow Parsley 15 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 8 0.01 0.08 Apiaceae Conium maculatum Hemlock 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 1 0 10 0.02 0.2 Apiaceae Heracleum sphondylium Hogweed 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 2 0 11 0.03 0.33 Aspleniaceae Asplenium scolopendrium Hart's-tongue 12 3 3 12 3 0 0 0 0 1 6 28 0.01 0.28 Asteraceae Anthemis arvensis Corn Chamomile N A 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 4 1 0 15 0.01 0.15 Asteraceae Anthemis cotula Stinking Chamomile N A 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 6 1 0 17 0.01 0.17 Asteraceae Carduus tenuiflorus Slender Thistle 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 1 3 10 0.01 0.1 Asteraceae Senecio jacobaea European Ragwort 18 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 4 1 3 19 0.02 0.38 Asteraceae Silybum marianum Milk Thistle 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 6 11 0.01 0.11 Asteraceae Sonchus oleraceus Smooth Sow-thistle 15 3 6 3 0 3 0 6 4 1 6 32 0.03 0.96 Asteraceae Tussilago farfara Colt's foot 16 0 0 6 3 0 0 2 2 6 0 19 0.01 0.19 Boraginaceae Myosotis arvensis Field Forget-me-not 13 6 0 3 0 3 0 6 4 1 0 23 1 23 Brassicaceae Cardamine hirsuta Wavy Bitter-cress 12 3 0 12 3 3 0 6 4 1 0 32 1.25 40 Brassicaceae Erysimum cheiranthoides Treacle Mustard 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 1 0 9 0.01 0.09 Brassicaceae Sinapis alba White Mustard 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 1 0 9 0.01 0.09 Brassicaceae Sisymbrium officinale Hedge Mustard 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 1 0 9 0.01 0.09 Caryophyllaceae Cerastium glomeratum Sticky Mouse-ear 12 3 3 12 3 3 0 6 4 1 0 35 0.25 8.75 Caryophyllaceae Sagina filicaulis Annual Pearlwort N A 0 0 12 3 3 0 6 2 1 0 27 0.01 0.27 Caryophyllaceae Silene latifolia White Campion 13 0 6 3 0 0 0 2 4 1 0 16 0.01 0.16 Cyperaceae Carex flacca Glaucous Sedge 14 6 0 12 3 3 0 2 4 3 0 33 2 66 Equisetaceae Equisetum arvense Field Horsetail 15 3 0 12 3 0 0 0 0 9 0 27 0.25 6.75 Euphorbiaceae Euphorbia helioscopia Sun Spurge 14 0 6 6 0 0 0 6 4 1 0 23 0.01 0.23 Euphorbiaceae Euphorbia peplus Petty Spurge 14 3 0 6 0 0 0 6 4 1 0 20 0.02 0.4 Euphorbiaceae Mercurialis annua Annual Mercury 12 0 0 12 3 0 0 6 4 1 0 26 0.01 0.26 Fabaceae Trifolium arvense Hare's-foot Clover 12 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 4 1 0 12 0.01 0.12 Fabaceae Trifolium campestre Hop Trefoil 12 0 0 12 3 3 0 4 4 1 0 27 0.01 0.27 Fabaceae Trifolium fragiferum Strawberry Clover 12 0 0 12 3 3 0 4 0 1 0 23 0.01 0.23 Fabaceae Trifolium striatum Knotted Clover N A 0 0 12 3 3 0 4 6 1 0 29 0.01 0.29 Fabaceae Vicia sativa Common Vetch 12 3 0 12 3 0 0 4 4 1 0 27 0.02 0.54 Fabaceae Vicia sepium Bush Vetch 12 0 0 12 3 0 0 4 4 1 0 24 0.01 0.24 Gentianaceae Centaurium pulchellum Lesser Centaury 13 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 4 1 0 15 0.01 0.15 Geraniaceae Geranium pusillum Small-flowered 12 0 0 12 3 0 0 6 4 1 0 26 0.01 0.26 Geraniaceae Geranium robertianum HerbCrane's Robert-bill 13 3 3 3 0 3 0 6 4 1 0 23 0.02 0.46 Iridaceae Sisyrinchium californicum Californian Yellow- N A 0 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 9 1 9 Juncaceae Juncus articulatus Jointedmaiden Rush 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 3 0 12 0.03 0.36 Juncaceae Juncus bufonius Toad Rush 13 6 0 12 3 0 0 6 4 1 0 32 0.25 8 Juncaceae Juncus effusus Soft Rush 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 3 0 15 0.5 7.5 Juncaceae Luzula multiflora subsp. Heath Wood-rush 10 6 0 12 3 3 0 2 4 1 0 31 0.01 0.31 Lamiaceae Lamiumcongesta amplexicaule Henbit Dead-nettle 13 3 0 3 0 3 0 6 4 1 0 20 0.03 0.6 Lamiaceae Lamium purpureum var. Red Dead-nettle 12 3 6 3 0 3 0 6 4 1 0 26 0.03 0.78 Lamiaceae Prunellapurpureum vulgaris Selfheal 13 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 4 1 0 10 0.01 0.1 Onagraceae Chamerion angustifolium Rosebay Willowherb 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 0 7 0.04 0.28 Onagraceae Epilobium ciliatum N A 0 0 3 0 3 0 6 2 2 3 19 0.25 4.75 Onagraceae Epilobium hirsutum Great Willowherb 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 0 7 0.04 0.28 Onagraceae Epilobium obscurum Short-fruited 12 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 2 2 3 17 0.01 0.17 Orobanchaceae Euphrasia confusa EuropeanWillowherb Eyebright 13 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 2 1 0 10 20 200 Orobanchaceae Parentucellia viscosa Yellow Bartsia 12 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 2 1 0 10 0.04 0.4 Oxalidaceae Oxalis corniculata Yellow-sorrel 15 0 0 3 0 0 0 6 2 3 0 14 1 14 Papaveraceae Papaver lecoqii Yellow-juiced Poppy 13 6 0 3 0 0 0 6 6 1 0 22 0.25 5.5 Plantaginaceae Cymbalaria muralis Ivy-leaved Toadflax 11 0 0 12 0 0 3 4 0 2 0 21 0.04 0.84 Plantaginaceae Plantago coronopus Buck's-horn Plantain 14 3 0 12 3 0 0 6 4 1 0 29 0.02 0.58 Plantaginaceae Plantago major Greater Plantain 16 3 0 12 3 0 0 4 6 1 0 29 0.2 5.8 Plantaginaceae Veronica agrestis Green Field 13 6 3 12 3 3 0 6 4 1 0 38 0.25 9.5 Plantaginaceae Veronica arvensis WallSpeedwell Speedwell 13 6 3 12 3 3 0 6 2 1 0 36 0.25 9 Plantaginaceae Veronica officinalis Heath Speedwell 12 3 0 3 0 0 0 4 4 2 0 16 1.5 24 Poaceae Avena fatua Wild-oat 13 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 4 1 0 12 0.01 0.12 Poaceae Bromus catharticus 11 3 0 12 3 3 0 4 2 1 0 28 0.02 0.56 Poaceae Bromus erectus Upright Brome 13 0 0 12 3 3 0 4 2 1 0 25 0.01 0.25 Poaceae Bromus sterilis Barren Brome 13 0 0 12 3 0 0 4 0 1 0 20 0.01 0.2 Poaceae Cynosurus echinatus Rough Dog's-tail 12 3 0 12 3 0 0 4 2 1 0 25 0.01 0.25 Poaceae Elymus farctus Sand Couch 13 0 0 12 3 3 0 4 4 3 0 29 0.01 0.29 Poaceae Hordeum comosum Hairy Barley 12 3 0 3 0 0 0 4 2 1 0 13 0.01 0.13 Poaceae Hordeum murinum Wall Barley 12 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 2 1 0 10 0.01 0.1 Poaceae Phalaris canariensis Canary-grass 11 0 0 12 3 0 0 4 2 1 0 22 0.01 0.22 Poaceae Puccinellia glaucescens Saltmarsh-grass 10 0 0 12 3 3 0 4 2 1 0 25 0.01 0.25 Poaceae Trisetum spicatum N A 0 0 12 3 3 0 4 0 1 0 23 0.01 0.23 Poaceae Triticum aestivum Wheat 7 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 8 0.01 0.08 Polygonaceae Persicaria maculosa Redshank 13 0 0 3 0 0 0 6 6 1 0 16 0.01 0.16 Polygonaceae Polygonum arenastrum N A 0 0 12 3 3 0 6 4 1 0 29 0.01 0.29 Polygonaceae Polygonum aviculare Commo n Knotgrass 12 3 0 3 0 0 0 6 4 1 0 17 0.01 0.17 Polygonaceae Rumex acetosella subsp.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vascular Plants at Fort Ross State Historic Park
    19005 Coast Highway One, Jenner, CA 95450 ■ 707.847.3437 ■ [email protected] ■ www.fortross.org Title: Vascular Plants at Fort Ross State Historic Park Author(s): Dorothy Scherer Published by: California Native Plant Society i Source: Fort Ross Conservancy Library URL: www.fortross.org Fort Ross Conservancy (FRC) asks that you acknowledge FRC as the source of the content; if you use material from FRC online, we request that you link directly to the URL provided. If you use the content offline, we ask that you credit the source as follows: “Courtesy of Fort Ross Conservancy, www.fortross.org.” Fort Ross Conservancy, a 501(c)(3) and California State Park cooperating association, connects people to the history and beauty of Fort Ross and Salt Point State Parks. © Fort Ross Conservancy, 19005 Coast Highway One, Jenner, CA 95450, 707-847-3437 .~ ) VASCULAR PLANTS of FORT ROSS STATE HISTORIC PARK SONOMA COUNTY A PLANT COMMUNITIES PROJECT DOROTHY KING YOUNG CHAPTER CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY DOROTHY SCHERER, CHAIRPERSON DECEMBER 30, 1999 ) Vascular Plants of Fort Ross State Historic Park August 18, 2000 Family Botanical Name Common Name Plant Habitat Listed/ Community Comments Ferns & Fern Allies: Azollaceae/Mosquito Fern Azo/la filiculoides Mosquito Fern wp Blechnaceae/Deer Fern Blechnum spicant Deer Fern RV mp,sp Woodwardia fimbriata Giant Chain Fern RV wp Oennstaedtiaceae/Bracken Fern Pleridium aquilinum var. pubescens Bracken, Brake CG,CC,CF mh T Oryopteridaceae/Wood Fern Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosorum Western lady Fern RV sp,wp Dryopteris arguta Coastal Wood Fern OS op,st Dryopteris expansa Spreading Wood Fern RV sp,wp Polystichum munitum Western Sword Fern CF mh,mp Equisetaceae/Horsetail Equisetum arvense Common Horsetail RV ds,mp Equisetum hyemale ssp.affine Common Scouring Rush RV mp,sg Equisetum laevigatum Smooth Scouring Rush mp,sg Equisetum telmateia ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Planting Schemes Advice Note 2021
    Natural Environment Team East Dorset Environment Partnership Dorset Biodiversity Appraisal Protocol Advice Note Planting scheme recommendations Introduction This advice note was written with the East Dorset Environment Partnership and is intended primarily to assist ecological consultants and developers when submitting Biodiversity Plans (BPs) and Landscape & Ecological Management Plans (LEMPs) to DC NET for review under the Dorset Biodiversity Appraisal Protocol (DBAP) by describing how to maximise the biodiversity potential of good planting schemes designed to deliver multiple benefits and contribute to achieving biodiversity net gain. Making the most of existing habitats strengthened through strong eco-tones; sound planting composition; connectivity to ecological networks within and beyond site boundaries and appropriate on-going management are all fundamental elements of an outstanding planting scheme. Submitted planting schemes for developments should seek to offer biodiversity benefit and comply with Dorset Council’s Pollinators Action Plan and Green Infrastructure Strategies. Schemes should demonstrate how they will contribute to addressing the Climate & Ecological Emergency Strategy (Draft 2020). Currently, many schemes appear to be generic designs that do not take account of local conditions and are based on widely available and low-cost shrubs; many of which are invasive, potentially invasive or nuisance plants known as ‘garden thugs’. This is of particular concern where new sites for development are on the rural fringe and pose a significant risk of spreading damaging alien plant species into the wider countryside and sensitive semi-natural habitats. Recent published work by the Royal Horticultural Society (RHS) and others has focussed on lists of plants that attract pollinators rather than broader biodiversity considerations.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Weeds of Coastal Plains and Heathy Forests Bioregions of Victoria Heading in Band
    Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria Heading in band b Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria Heading in band Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria Contents Introduction 1 Purpose of the list 1 Limitations 1 Relationship to statutory lists 1 Composition of the list and assessment of taxa 2 Categories of environmental weeds 5 Arrangement of the list 5 Column 1: Botanical Name 5 Column 2: Common Name 5 Column 3: Ranking Score 5 Column 4: Listed in the CALP Act 1994 5 Column 5: Victorian Alert Weed 5 Column 6: National Alert Weed 5 Column 7: Weed of National Significance 5 Statistics 5 Further information & feedback 6 Your involvement 6 Links 6 Weed identification texts 6 Citation 6 Acknowledgments 6 Bibliography 6 Census reference 6 Appendix 1 Environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria listed alphabetically within risk categories. 7 Appendix 2 Environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria listed by botanical name. 19 Appendix 3 Environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria listed by common name. 31 Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria i Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment Melbourne, March2008 © The State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2009 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • Agrobiodiversity.2019.2585-8246.323-332
    https://doi.org/10.15414/agrobiodiversity.2019.2585-8246.323-332 AGROBIODIVERSITY FOR IMPROVING NUTRITION , HEALTH AND LIFE QUALITY 2019 ACCUMULATION OF NUTRIENTS IN THE RAW OF CRAMBE L. SPECIES Vergun Olena*, Shymanska Oksana, Rakhmetov Dzhamal, Fishchenko Valentyna, Bondarchuk Oleksandr, Rakhmetova Svitlana M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine Received: 29. 11. 2019 Revised: 1. 12. 2019 Published: 6. 12. 2019 Investigation of accumulation of different compounds in above-ground part of these plants an important aspect for evaluation of perspective of use. The aim of this study was to compare the peculiarities of the biochemical composition of Crambe species dynamically. Plant material collected from the experimental collection of M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine. It was studied above-ground parts of C. cordifolia Steven, C. koktebelica (Junge) N. Busch, C. maritima L., C. steveniana parameters was studied: dry matter by drying to consist weight at the 105 °C; content of sugars by Bertrand‘s method Rupr. At using the spring of glucose vegetation, scale; buddingascorbic stage, acids flowering, with 2.6-dichlorophenolindophenol, and fruitage. Following biochemical tannins with indigo carmine discoloration, organic acids by sodium hydroxide titration with phenolphthalein; vegetation was from 9.76 (C. cordifolia, budding) to 22.54 (C. maritima at the fruitage) %, total content ofcarotene sugars withfrom gasoline6.54 (C. maritimegalosh spectrophotometrically; at the fruitage) to 33.18 ash ( C.in cordifolia muffle over. at the The budding) dry matter %, ascorbic during acid from 139.85 (C. maritima at the spring vegetation) to 987.02 (C.
    [Show full text]
  • TAXONOMY Plant Family Species Scientific Name GENERAL
    Plant Propagation Protocol for Erigeron acris L. ESRM 412 – Native Plant Production Protocol URL: https://courses.washington.edu/esrm412/protocols/ERAC2.pdf TAXONOMY Plant Family Scientific Name Compositae, tribe Astereae Common Name Daisy, tribe Aster Species Scientific Name Scientific Name Erigeron acris L. Varieties Erigeron acris L. var. debilis A. Gray, Trimorpha acris (L.) Gray var. debilis (A. Gray) G.L. Nesom, Erigeron acris L. var. kamtschaticus (DC.) Herder, Trimorpha acris (L.) Gray var. kamtschatica (DC.) G.L. Nesom, Erigeron acris L. var. asteroides (Andrz. ex Besser) DC., Trimorpha acris (L.) Gray var. asteroides (Andrz. ex Besser) G.L. Nesom Sub-species debilis (A. Gray) Piper, decoloratus (H. Lindb.) Hiitonen, droebachiensis (O.F. Müll.) Arcang., kamtschaticus (DC.) H. Hara, politus (Fr.) Schinz & R. Keller Cultivar None. Common Erigeron acris auct. non L. p.p., Erigeron angulosus Gaudin Synonym(s) ssp. debilis (A. Gray) Piper, Erigeron debilis (A. Gray) Rydb., Erigeron jucundus Greene, Erigeron nivalis Nutt., Trimorpha acris auct. non (L.) Gray p.p., Erigeron kamtschaticus DC., Erigeron droebachensis O.F. Müll., Erigeron elongatus Ledeb., Erigeron politus Fr., Trimorpha elongata (Ledeb.) Vierh. Common Bitter Daisy, Bitter Fleabane, Blue Fleabane (ssp. debilis, politus) (USDA Name(s) NRCS) Species Code (as ERAC2 per USDA Plants database) GENERAL INFORMATION Geographical range Ecological Although it can apparently grow in shade, in dry or rocky woods, this distribution species seems to grow most vigorously in rich, moist soil where it receives at least partial sunlight. (Erigeron 2013) Climate and 670-1589 m elevation range Climate is currently unknown or variable (Klinkenberg 2017) Local habitat and Blue fleabane grows best in well-drained, neutral, or calcareous soils abundance particularly on warm southing facing slopes.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date
    Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date EQUISETACEAE HORSETAIL FAMILY Equisetum arvense L. Field Horsetail FF Equisetum fluviatile L. Water Horsetail LRB Equisetum hyemale L. ssp. affine (Engelm.) Stone Common Scouring-rush BS Equisetum laevigatum A. Braun Smooth Scouring-rush WM Equisetum variegatum Scheich. ex Fried. ssp. Small Horsetail LRB Variegatum DENNSTAEDIACEAE BRACKEN FAMILY Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn Bracken-Fern COF DRYOPTERIDACEAE TRUE FERN FAMILILY Athyrium filix-femina (L.) Roth ssp. angustum (Willd.) Northeastern Lady Fern FF Clausen Cystopteris bulbifera (L.) Bernh. Bulblet Fern FF Dryopteris carthusiana (Villars) H.P. Fuchs Spinulose Woodfern FF Matteuccia struthiopteris (L.) Tod. Ostrich Fern FF Onoclea sensibilis L. Sensitive Fern FF Polystichum acrostichoides (Michaux) Schott Christmas Fern FF ADDER’S-TONGUE- OPHIOGLOSSACEAE FERN FAMILY Botrychium virginianum (L.) Sw. Rattlesnake Fern FF FLOWERING FERN OSMUNDACEAE FAMILY Osmunda regalis L. Royal Fern WM POLYPODIACEAE POLYPODY FAMILY Polypodium virginianum L. Rock Polypody FF MAIDENHAIR FERN PTERIDACEAE FAMILY Adiantum pedatum L. ssp. pedatum Northern Maidenhair Fern FF THELYPTERIDACEAE MARSH FERN FAMILY Thelypteris palustris (Salisb.) Schott Marsh Fern WM LYCOPODIACEAE CLUB MOSS FAMILY Lycopodium lucidulum Michaux Shining Clubmoss OF Lycopodium tristachyum Pursh Ground-cedar COF SELAGINELLACEAE SPIKEMOSS FAMILY Selaginella apoda (L.) Fern. Spikemoss LRB CUPRESSACEAE CYPRESS FAMILY Juniperus communis L. Common Juniper Jun-E DS Juniperus virginiana L. Red Cedar Jun-E SD Thuja occidentalis L. White Cedar LRB PINACEAE PINE FAMILY Larix laricina (Duroi) K. Koch Tamarack Jun LRB Pinus banksiana Lambert Jack Pine COF Pinus resinosa Sol. ex Aiton Red Pine Jun-M CF Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List 1 Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date Pinus strobus L.
    [Show full text]
  • Berberine: Botanical Occurrence, Traditional Uses, Extraction Methods, and Relevance in Cardiovascular, Metabolic, Hepatic, and Renal Disorders
    REVIEW published: 21 August 2018 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00557 Berberine: Botanical Occurrence, Traditional Uses, Extraction Methods, and Relevance in Cardiovascular, Metabolic, Hepatic, and Renal Disorders Maria A. Neag 1, Andrei Mocan 2*, Javier Echeverría 3, Raluca M. Pop 1, Corina I. Bocsan 1, Gianina Cri¸san 2 and Anca D. Buzoianu 1 1 Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Clinical Pharmacology, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2 Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 3 Department of Environmental Sciences, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile Edited by: Berberine-containing plants have been traditionally used in different parts of the world for Anna Karolina Kiss, the treatment of inflammatory disorders, skin diseases, wound healing, reducing fevers, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland affections of eyes, treatment of tumors, digestive and respiratory diseases, and microbial Reviewed by: Pinarosa Avato, pathologies. The physico-chemical properties of berberine contribute to the high diversity Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo of extraction and detection methods. Considering its particularities this review describes Moro, Italy various methods mentioned in the literature so far with reference to the most important Sylwia Zielinska, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland factors influencing berberine extraction. Further, the common separation and detection *Correspondence: methods like thin layer chromatography, high performance liquid chromatography, and Andrei Mocan mass spectrometry are discussed in order to give a complex overview of the existing [email protected] methods. Additionally, many clinical and experimental studies suggest that berberine Specialty section: has several pharmacological properties, such as immunomodulatory, antioxidative, This article was submitted to cardioprotective, hepatoprotective, and renoprotective effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidad De Chile Facultad De Ciencias Forestales Y De La
    UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS FORESTALES Y DE LA CONSERVACION DE LA NATURALEZA ESCUELA DE CIENCIAS FORESTALES DEPARTAMENTO DE SILVICULTURA Y CONSERVACIÓN DE LA NATURALEZA COMPOSICIÓN FLORÍSTICA Y DIVERSIDAD DEL SOTOBOSQUE EN BOSQUES DE Nothofagus pumilio (Poepp et Endl.) Krasser DESPUÉS DEL RETROCESO DE LOS GLACIARES O’HIGGINS Y CHICO, CAMPO DE HIELO SUR Memoria para optar al Título Profesional de Ingeniera Forestal SOFÍA MARILYN OLIVARES FIGUEROA Profesor Guía: Sr. Álvaro Promis Baeza. Ingeniero Forestal, Doctor en Recursos Naturales Santiago, Chile 2017 UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS FORESTALES Y DE LA CONSERVACIÓN DE LA NATURALEZA ESCUELA DE CIENCIAS FORESTALES DEPARTAMENTO DE SILVICULTURA Y CONSERVACIÓN DE LA NATURALEZA COMPOSICIÓN FLORÍSTICA Y DIVERSIDAD DEL SOTOBOSQUE EN BOSQUES DE Nothofagus pumilio (Poepp et Endl.) Krasser DESPUÉS DEL RETROCESO DE LOS GLACIARES O’HIGGINS Y CHICO, CAMPO DE HIELO SUR Memoria para optar al Título Profesional de Ingeniera Forestal SOFÍA MARILYN OLIVARES FIGUEROA Calificaciones Nota Firma Prof. Guía Sr. Álvaro Promis 7,0 …………… Prof. Consejero Sr. Nicolás García 7,0 …………… Prof. Consejero Sr. Juan Pablo Fuentes 7,0 …………… AGRADECIMIENTOS Al profesor Álvaro Promis, por su compromiso y constancia para la realización de este trabajo. Por fomentar en mí el cuestionamiento, la observación y reflexión. Al Instituto Chileno de Campos de Hielo, por permitirme formar parte del programa Ciencia Joven y participar de la expedición que nos llevó a hasta uno de esos recónditos destinos, que cualquier amante y estudioso de la naturaleza quisiera visitar. A mis profesores consejeros Nicolás García y Juan Pablo Fuentes, por su disposición, contribución y acotaciones. A cada uno de las personas que dedicaron su tiempo de una u otra forma en la realización de este trabajo, escuchándome, aconsejándome, aclarando dudas, o apoyando directamente alguna de las actividades llevadas a cabo.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Shapes Plant Shapes
    TheThe AmericanAmerican GARDENERGARDENER® TheThe MagazineMagazine ofof thethe AAmericanmerican HorticulturalHorticultural SocietySociety March / April 2011 designing with Plant Shapes Creation of a Sustainable Rose Garden Daffodils for Every Region Solutions for Landscape Eyesores contents Volume 90, Number 2 . March / April 2011 FEATURES DEPARTMENTS 5 NOTES FROM RIVER FARM 6 MEMBERS’ FORUM 8 NEWS FROM THE AHS River Farm’s Osage orange tree named National Champion, Spring Garden Market in April, National Youth Garden Symposium, ExxonMobil funds summer internship, River Farm part of Historic Garden Week in Virginia, new AHS Affiliate Member program launched. 12 AHS MEMBERS MAKING A DIFFERENCE Honey Barnekoff. 13 AHS CORPORATE MEMBER PROFILE The Espoma Company. 14 AHS NEWS SPECIAL page 18 2011 Great American Gardeners National Award winners and 2011 Book Award winners. DAFFODILS: REGIONAL PROVEN PERFORMERS 18 46 GARDEN SOLUTIONS BY MARY LOU GRIPSHOVER No-sweat tips for great garden soil. Experts from the American Daffodil Society share their recom- mendations for cultivars that will thrive in different regions of 48 HOMEGROWN HARVEST North America. Pleasing peas. 50 GARDENER’S NOTEBOOK A PLANT SHAPE PRIMER BY RAND B. LEE 24 Monarch butterflies make slow recovery, For the design-impaired, here’s how to combine plants with dif- nematodes show promise as fruit tree pest ferent shapes effectively in the garden. biocontrols, Morton Arboretum introduces new sweetspire cultivar, endangered plants lacking in botanic garden collections, OREGON’S PLANT GEEK EXTRAORDINAIRE BY KIM POKORNY 28 Mailorder Gardening Association changes Running a trend-setting nursery, globe-trotting in search of new name, Harold Pellett is 2011 Scott Medal plants, writing horticultural references, and designing gardens recipient.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Review of the Genus Crambe Sect. Crambe (Brassicaceae, Brassiceae)
    Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid Vol. 66(1): 7-24 enero-junio 2009 ISSN: 0211-1322 doi: 10.3989/ajbm.2186 Taxonomic review of the genus Crambe sect. Crambe (Brassicaceae, Brassiceae) by Anibal Oscar Prina Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, C. C. 300, Santa Rosa, La Pampa, República Argentina [email protected] Abstract Resumen Prina, A. 2009. Taxonomic review of the genus Crambe sect. Prina, A. 2009. Revisión taxonómica del género Crambe sect. Crambe (Brassicaceae, Brassiceae). Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid Crambe (Brassicaceae, Brassiceae). Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 66(1): 7-24. 66(1): 7-24 (en inglés). The systematics of the genus Crambe L. sect. Crambe is re- En el presente trabajo se revisa la sistemática del género Crambe viewed, within which 16 species and 5 infraspecific taxa are con- L. sect. Crambe, que cuenta con 16 especies y 5 táxones infraes- sidered, which are distributed from E and N Europe to Central pecíficos distribuidos desde el E y N de Europa hasta Asia central. Asia. A key for their identification is provided, along with a brief Se proporcionan una clave para su identificación, una breve des- description, synonyms, distribution and habitat of each taxon. cripción de cada uno, los sinónimos, el hábitat y la distribución. The infrageneric systematics of Crambe is discussed briefly. The Se discute brevemente la sistemática infragenérica del género following new combinations are proposed: Crambe edentula Crambe. Se proponen las siguientes nuevas combinaciones: var. glabrata (Freyn & Sintenis) Prina comb. nov. and C. oriental- Crambe edentula var. glabrata (Freyn & Sintenis) Prina comb.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Identification of Isoquinoline Alkaloids from Berberis Microphylla
    Boletín Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Plantas Medicinales y Aromáticas ISSN: 0717-7917 [email protected] Universidad de Santiago de Chile Chile MANOSALVA, Loreto; MUTIS, Ana; DÍAZ, Juan; URZÚA, Alejandro; FAJARDO, Víctor; QUIROZ, Andrés Identification of isoquinoline alkaloids from Berberis microphylla by HPLC ESI-MS/MS Boletín Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Plantas Medicinales y Aromáticas, vol. 13, núm. 4, 2014, pp. 324-335 Universidad de Santiago de Chile Santiago, Chile Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=85631435002 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative © 2014 Boletín Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Plantas Medicinales y Aromáticas 13 (4): 324 - 335 ISSN 0717 7917 www.blacpma.usach.cl Artículo Original | Original Article In memorian Professor Luis Astudillo, Universidad de Talca, Chile Identification of isoquinoline alkaloids from Berberis microphylla by HPLC ESI-MS/MS [Identificación de alcaloides isoquinolínicos en Berberis microphylla G. Forst mediante CLAE IES-MS/MS] Loreto MANOSALVA1, Ana MUTIS2, Juan DÍAZ3, Alejandro URZÚA4, Víctor FAJARDO5 & Andrés QUIROZ2 1Doctorado en Ciencias de Recursos Naturales; 2Laboratorio de Ecología Química, Departamento de Ciencias Químicas y Recursos Naturales; 3Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry, Scientific and Technological Bioresource Nucleus (Bioren), Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile 4Laboratory of Chemical Ecology, Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Chemistry and Biology, Universidad de Santiago de Chile 5Chile Laboratorio de Productos Naturales, Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas, Chile Contactos | Contacts: Andrés QUIROZ - E-mail address: [email protected] Abstract: Berberis microphylla (G.
    [Show full text]
  • 9. a 10 Year Trial with South American Trees and Shrubs with Special
    9. A 10 year trial with SouthAmerican trees and shrubswith specialregard to the Ir,lothofaglzsspp. I0 6ra royndir vid suduramerikonskumtroum og runnum vid serligumatliti at Nothofagw-slogum SarenOdum Abstract The potential of the ligneous flora of cool temperate South America in arboriculture in the Faroe Isles is elucidated through experimental planting of a broad variety of speciescollected on expeditions to Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego 1975 andl9T9.Particular good results have been obtained with the southernmost origins of Nothofagus antarctica, N. betuloides, and N. pumilio, of which a total of 6.500 plants were directly transplanted from Tierra del Fuego to the Faroe Isles in 1979. Soren Odum, Royal Vet.& Agric. IJniv., Arboretum, DK-2970 Horsholm, Denmark. Introduction As a student of botany at the University of CopenhagenI got the opportunity to get a job for the summer 1960as a member of the team mapping the flora of the Faroe Isles (Kjeld Hansen 1966). State geologist of the Faroe Isles and the Danish Geological Survey, J6annesRasmussen, provided working facilities for the team at the museum, and also my co-student,J6hannes J6hansen participated in the field. This stay and work founded my still growing interest in the Faroese nature and culture, and the initial connections between the Arboretum in Horsholm and Tbrshavn developed from this early contact with J6annesRasmussen and J6hannes J6hansen. On our way back to Copenhagen in 1960 onboard "Tjaldur", we called on Lerwick, Shetland, where I saw Hebe and Olearia in some gardens. This made it obvious to me, that if the Faroe Isles for historical reasonshad been more or less British rather than Nordic, the gardensof T6rshavn would, no doubt, have been speckledwith genera from the southern Hemisphere and with other speciesand cultivars nowadays common in Scottish nurseries and gardens.
    [Show full text]