DOCSLIB.ORG

Developing an Ecological Sanitation Transect

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Developing an Ecological Sanitation Transect University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses Dissertations and Theses March 2016 Developing An Ecological Sanitation Transect Ian Kolesinskas University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/masters_theses_2 Part of the Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Commons, Environmental Design Commons, Environmental Engineering Commons, Food Security Commons, Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Kolesinskas, Ian, "Developing An Ecological Sanitation Transect" (2016). Masters Theses. 327. https://doi.org/10.7275/7975054 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/masters_theses_2/327 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEVELOPING AN ECOLOGICAL SANITATION TRANSECT A Thesis Presented By IAN JAMES KOLESINSKAS Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF REGIONAL PLANNING February 2016 Master of Regional Planning Program DEVELOPING AN ECOLOGICAL SANITATION TRANSECT A Thesis Presented By IAN JAMES KOLESINSKAS Approved as to style and content by: Robert Ryan, Chair Wayne Feiden, Member Mark Hamin, Member Elisabeth Hamin, Department Head Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning DEDICATION For my grandmother, Audrey Schurmann. Rest in peace. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee chair, Robert Ryan, for his guidance and interest in my research. Thank you to Wayne Feiden for being a member of my committee as well as a planner to look up to. Mark Hamin, thank you for being my advisor and mentor during my time in the MRP program and for recruiting me into Environmental Design in the first place. I want to thank Elisabeth Hamin for running a fantastic department. Thank you to all the MRPs, PhDs, and MLAs that I got to know so well at UMass. You opened my mind and really taught me the meaning of hard work. A special thank you to Traci Laichter for supporting me and my loving family for always encouraging me. iv ABSTRACT DEVELOPING AN ECOLOGICAL SANITATION TRANSECT FEBRUARY 2016 IAN JAMES KOLESINSKAS, B.S., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST M.R.P., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Directed by: Robert Ryan A sanitation problem exists for people across the globe: basic human waste collection and treatment is inaccessible to much of the world’s population; and the status-quo gray infrastructure system of sanitation is unsustainable and unsuitable for widespread application. A paradigm shift is needed: this thesis makes the case for developing an Ecological Sanitation Transect to bring back the closed loop that connects consumption, waste excretion, sanitation, and food production. The Ecological Sanitation Transect is a synthesis of ecological sanitation, where human excreta is reused, and the urban transect, where development density is conceptualized along a continuum from rural to urban. Current literature related to transects, sanitation, and the links between them is investigated. An analytical overlay of ecological sanitation strategies onto the transect framework with accompanying visualizations is the resulting integration of these ideas. Case studies from across the transect are detailed. A concluding discussion is followed by directions for future research. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................... iv ABSTRACT ................................................................................................. v LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................... viii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1 1.1 A Brief History of Sanitation ........................................................... 1 1.2 The Problem .................................................................................. 3 1.3 A Solution ....................................................................................... 5 2. LITERATURE REVIEW .......................................................................... 7 2.1 The Transect In Planning ............................................................... 7 2.2 Adapting the Urban Transect ....................................................... 11 2.2.1 Green Infrastructure Transects ....................................... 13 2.3 Sanitation Systems ...................................................................... 16 2.3.1 Latrines ........................................................................... 16 2.3.2 Septic Systems ............................................................... 17 2.3.3 Sewer ............................................................................. 17 2.3.4 Biosolids ......................................................................... 18 2.5 Ecological Sanitation .................................................................... 19 2.5.1 Collection ........................................................................ 21 2.5.2 Treatment ....................................................................... 22 2.6 Ecological Sanitation and Density ................................................ 23 3. DEVELOPING AN ECOLOGICAL SANITATION TRANSECT ............ 27 4. RESEARCH QUESTIONS .................................................................... 29 5. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................. 30 5.1 Case Studies ................................................................................ 30 5.2 Visualizations ............................................................................... 30 6. THE ECOLOGICAL SANITATION TRANSECT .................................. 32 vi 7. CASE STUDIES ................................................................................... 41 7.1 T1- Natural Zone: Patos Island, Eastsound WA .......................... 41 7.2 T2- Rural Zone: Rich Earth Institute, Brattleboro VT ................... 43 7.3 T3- Peri-Urban Zone: Cobb Hill Cohousing, Hartland VT ............ 45 7.4 T4- Suburban Zone: Sand Creek, Aurora CO .............................. 47 7.5 T5- Urban Zone: Bullitt Center, Seattle WA ................................. 49 7.6 T6- Urban Core Zone: Battery Park City, New York, NY ............. 52 7.7 Discussion ................................................................................... 58 8. CONCLUSION ...................................................................................... 59 8.1 Implementation ............................................................................ 59 8.1.1 Inter-Zone Flows ............................................................. 60 8.1.2 Growth Management ...................................................... 61 8.1.3 Monitoring ....................................................................... 63 8.1.4 Regulations ..................................................................... 63 8.2 Directions for Future Research .................................................... 64 8.2.1 Retrofitting (Converting From Gray To Ecological) ......... 64 8.2.2 Centralized versus Decentralized ................................... 65 8.2.3 Taboo/acceptance .......................................................... 65 REFERENCES .......................................................................................... 67 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1: The Valley Section. Patrick Geddes. 1909 ........................................................ 8 2: The Growing Siedlung. Leberecht Migge. 1932 ................................................. 9 3: Urban Transect. Andrés Duany. 2008 ............................................................. 10 4: Agrarian Urbanism Transect. Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company. 2009 ....................................................... 12 5: Agri-Urban Spectrum. Stephens Planning & Design. 2011 ............................. 12 6: Identification of GI Policies. Abunnasr and Hamin. 2012 ................................. 14 7: Horizontal & Vertical Integration. Abunnasr and Hamin. 2012 ......................... 14 8: Green Infrastructure Transect. AECOM Design + Planning. 2010 .................. 15 9: Conventional Sanitation. Werner et al. 2009 ................................................... 20 10: Ecological Sanitation. Werner et al. 2009 ...................................................... 21 11: Layout of the Chosen Systems in Hillerød. Magid et al. 2006 ....................... 25 12: Assessing the Key Role of Water, Energy, and Sanitation. Rockstroem et al. .......................................................................................... 26 13: The Ecological Sanitation Transect ............................................................... 33 14: T-1 The Natural Zone ..................................................................................... 34 15: T-2 The Rural Zone ........................................................................................ 35 16: T-3 The Peri-Urban Zone ............................................................................... 36 17: T-4 The Suburban Zone ................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reducing the Food Wastage Footprint
    toolkit.xps:Layout 1 13/06/13 11.44 Pagina 3 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-107741-2 (print) E-ISBN 978-92-5-107743-6 (PDF) © FAO 2013 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact- us/licence-request or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/publications) and can be purchased through publications- [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Native Plant Press
    Native Plant Press January 2020 The Native Plant Press The Newsletter of the Central Puget Sound Chapter of WNPS Volume 21 No. 11 January 2020 Holiday Party Recap On Sunday, December 8th, the Central Puget Sound Chapter held our annual holiday party. The event was a potluck, and the fare was wide-ranging and excellent. The native plant-focused silent auction offered several hand-made wreaths, numerous potted natives from tiny succulents to gangly shrubs, plant-themed books and ephemera, and a couple of experiences. The selection occasioned some intense bidding wars, with Franja Bryant and Sharon Baker arriving at a compromise in their battle over the Native Garden Tea Party. A highlight of the party was the presentation of awards to Member, Steward and Professional of the Year. Each year, nominations are submitted by members and the recipients are chosen by the CPS Board. Stewart Wechsler (left) was chosen Member of the Year. Stewart is a Botany Fellow for the chapter and for many years has offered well-attended plant ID sessions before our westside meetings. In addition, he often fields the many botanical questions that we receive from the public. David Perasso (center) is our Steward of the Year. David is a Native Plant Steward at Martha Washington Park on Lake Washington and has been working to restore the historic oak/camas prairie ecosystem at the site. The site is now at the stage where David was able to host a First Nation camas harvest recently. He is also an active volunteer at our native plant nursery, providing vital expertise in the identification and propagation of natives.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing an Evaluation Protocol for Composting Toilet Systems ______
    Designing an Evaluation Protocol for Composting Toilet Systems ______________________________________________________________ An Interactive Qualifying Project submitted to the Faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science. By: Camryn Berry Zahava Preil Lena Sophia Thompson Date: February 26, 2020 Report Submitted to: Professor Seth Tuler and Professor Isa Bar-On This report represents work of WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its web site without editorial or peer review. For more information about the projects program at WPI, see http://www.wpi.edu/Academics/Projects Abstract Two billion people worldwide lack access to adequate sanitation which ensures hygienic separation of human excreta from human contact. Composting toilets help address this health hazard by containing waste and reducing risk of disease. The goal of our project was to develop a cost-effective, user-friendly and minimally-disruptive protocol to evaluate the function, use and maintenance of composting toilets. This protocol was trialed at Kibbutz Lotan in Israel. We concluded that Lotan’s system was effective, though inefficient. The trial allowed us to identify potential improvements to the protocol that can be applied in the future. Our protocol is successful for evaluating the success of a system and how adequately it can address the unnecessary loss of life caused by inadequate sanitation. ii Acknowledgements We would like to thank the people who helped make our project possible. Firstly, we would like to thank our sponsor Alex Cicelsky of the Kibbutz Lotan Center for Creative Ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Forests: Their Services and Sustainability
    Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development ISSN: 2152-0801 online https://foodsystemsjournal.org Food forests: Their services and sustainability Stefanie Albrecht a * Leuphana University Lüneburg Arnim Wiek b Arizona State University Submitted July 29, 2020 / Revised October 22, 2020, and February 8, 2021 / Accepted Febuary 8, 2021 / Published online July 10, 2021 Citation: Albrecht, S., & Wiek, A (2021). Food forests: Their services and sustainability. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 10(3), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2021.103.014 Copyright © 2021 by the Authors. Published by the Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems. Open access under CC-BY license. Abstract detailed insights on 14 exemplary food forests in Industrialized food systems use unsustainable Europe, North America, and South America, practices leading to climate change, natural gained through site visits and interviews. We resource depletion, economic disparities across the present and illustrate the main services that food value chain, and detrimental impacts on public forests provide and assess their sustainability. The health. In contrast, alternative food solutions such findings indicate that the majority of food forests as food forests have the potential to provide perform well on social-cultural and environmental healthy food, sufficient livelihoods, environmental criteria by building capacity, providing food, services, and spaces for recreation, education, and enhancing biodiversity, and regenerating soil, community building. This study compiles evidence among others. However, for broader impact, food from more than 200 food forests worldwide, with forests need to go beyond the provision of social- cultural and environmental services and enhance a * Corresponding author: Stefanie Albrecht, Doctoral student, their economic viability.
    [Show full text]
  • “Sustainable” Sanitation: Challenges and Opportunities in Urban Areas
    sustainability Review Towards “Sustainable” Sanitation: Challenges and Opportunities in Urban Areas Kim Andersson *, Sarah Dickin and Arno Rosemarin Stockholm Environment Institute, Linnégatan 87D, 115 23 Stockholm, Sweden; [email protected] (S.D.); [email protected] (A.R.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +46-73-707-8609 Academic Editors: Philipp Aerni and Amy Glasmeier Received: 8 June 2016; Accepted: 2 December 2016; Published: 8 December 2016 Abstract: While sanitation is fundamental for health and wellbeing, cities of all sizes face growing challenges in providing safe, affordable and functional sanitation systems that are also sustainable. Factors such as limited political will, inadequate technical, financial and institutional capacities and failure to integrate safe sanitation systems into broader urban development have led to a persistence of unsustainable systems and missed opportunities to tackle overlapping and interacting urban challenges. This paper reviews challenges associated with providing sanitation systems in urban areas and explores ways to promote sustainable sanitation in cities. It focuses on opportunities to stimulate sustainable sanitation approaches from a resource recovery perspective, generating added value to society while protecting human and ecosystem health. We show how, if integrated within urban development, sustainable sanitation has great potential to catalyse action and contribute to multiple sustainable development goals. Keywords: urbanization; sustainable sanitation; resource recovery; urban planning and development; public health 1. Introduction Sanitation is fundamental to healthy and productive urban life, and the provision of sanitation services for fast-growing urban populations is one of the world’s most urgent challenges. Currently, more than 700 million urban residents lack improved sanitation access globally, including 80 million who practise open defecation [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing the Ecological Sanitation: a Review on Technology and Methods
    Journal of Cleaner Production 125 (2016) 1e21 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Cleaner Production journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jclepro Review Constructing the ecological sanitation: a review on technology and methods * Ming Hu, Bin Fan , Hongliang Wang, Bo Qu, Shikun Zhu State Key Laboratory of Environmental Aquatic Chemistry, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China article info abstract Article history: Wastewater often contains valuable resources (e.g. organic matter and nutrients). Different from con- Received 29 April 2014 ventional sanitation approaches, the ecological sanitation (Eco-San) system is based on the closure of Received in revised form material flow cycles to recover resources with minimized demands on other resources. The review 29 February 2016 comprehensively summarized the main components of the Eco-San system (user interface, collection Accepted 2 March 2016 and conveyance, storage and primary treatment, and reuse/disposal), the frequently-used evaluation Available online 15 March 2016 methods, and the framework of evaluation index system. Some typical practical cases were discussed to demonstrate the managerial implications and popularize the applications of the Eco-San system. The Keywords: fi fi Ecological sanitation results show that the Eco-San systems are bene cial to resource ef ciency, agricultural use of the organic Evaluation matters and nutrients, and energy recovery although some shortages exist (e.g. high cost, cultural Wastewater treatment constraints, and complex operation and management). The evaluation methods can help to identify the Sustainability restriction factors, contributing factors and measures to improve the efficiency of the future Eco-San Rural system.
    [Show full text]
  • Aid-Savory-3Rd
    The Animal Improved Dung (AID) plus seeds treatment. Managing livestock, dung beetles and earthworms to disperse rock dusts, fertilizers, beneficial micro- organisms, biochar and seeds to grow forests and food, improve soils and fix carbon and climate. Summary The AID plus seeds treatment is a system of innovations which hastens and enhances succession, increases soil carbon and fertility and grows high biomass vegetation. Soil improvers such as rock dusts, spores of beneficial micro-organisms, mineral fertilizers, biochar and burnt bone (from home-made fuel-efficient stoves) and seeds of fast- growing, deep-rooted plants can be fed to livestock to disperse in their manure. Dung beetles, earthworms and termites further disperse and incorporate the improved dung into the soil and increase the availability of nutrients, while their tunnels improve soil structure including air and water infiltration and root growth. Livestock in a planned grazing system can be used to treat/seed areas such as pastures, orchards, plantations, vegetable garden fallows and to reafforest degraded land. The resulting vegetation produces food and fodder, timber (carbon stored for hundreds of years), and fuel wood which produces charcoal (carbon stored in soil for possibly thousands of years), improves soil by promoting the growth of soil life and adding carbon, reduces erosion, as well as increasing transpiration, cloud formation and precipitation. “...increasing agricultural productivity would not only reduce conversion of wild land to new cropland, but it could return existing cropland back to nature. Increasing agricultural productivity is the single most effective method of preventing habitat loss and fragmentation, and conserving global forests, terrestrial biodiversity and carbon stocks and sinks”.
    [Show full text]
  • Valuing Wastes an Integrated System Analysis of Bioenergy, Ecological Sanitation, and Soil Fertility Management in Smallholder Farming in Karagwe, Tanzania
    Valuing wastes An Integrated System Analysis of Bioenergy, Ecological Sanitation, and Soil Fertility Management in Smallholder Farming in Karagwe, Tanzania vorgelegt von Dipl.-Ing. Ariane Krause geb. in Freiburg i. Brsg. von der Fakult¨at VI – Planen Bauen Umwelt der Technischen Universit¨at Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktorin der Ingenieurwissenschaften - Dr.-Ing. - genehmigte Dissertation Promotionsausschuss: Vorsitzende: Prof. Dr. Eva Nora Paton Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Johann K¨oppel Gutachterin: Prof. Dr. Vera Susanne Rotter (Fak. III) Gutachterin: Prof. Dr. Friederike Lang (Albert-Ludwigs-Universit¨at Freiburg) Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 26. Januar 2018 Berlin 2019 make compost not war Abstract My dissertation had as its starting point the intention of two Tanzanian farmer’s initiatives and their German partners to disseminate sustainable cooking and sanitation technologies to smallholder households in Karagwe District, in northwest Tanzania (TZ). These locally developed and adapted technologies include improved cook stoves (ICS), such as microgasifiers, and a system combining biogas digesters and burners for cooking, as well as urine-diverting dry toilets and thermal sterilization/pasteurization for ecological sanitation (EcoSan). Currently, the most common combination of technologies used for cooking and sanitation in Karagwe smallholdings is a three-stone fire and pit latrine. Switching to the new alternatives could potentially lead to (i) optimized resource consumption, (ii) lower environmental emissions, and (iii) a higher availability of domestic residues for soil fertility management. The latter include biogas slurry from anaerobic digestion, powdery biochar from microgasifiers, and sanitized human excreta from EcoSan facilities. These residues are ‘locally available resources’ that can be used for on-farm material cycling.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Seattle Edward B
    City of Seattle Edward B. Murray, Mayor Finance and Administrative Services Fred Podesta, Director July 25, 2016 The Honorable Tim Burgess Seattle City Hall 501 5th Ave. Seattle, WA 98124 Councilmember Burgess, Attached is an annual report of all real property under City ownership. The annual review supports strategic management of the City’s real estate holdings. Because City needs change over time, the annual review helps create opportunities to find the best municipal use of each property or put it back into the private sector to avoid holding properties without an adopted municipal purpose. Each January, FAS initiates the annual review process. City departments with jurisdiction over real property assure that all recent acquisitions and/or dispositions are accurately represented, and provide current information about each property’s current use, and future use, if identified. Each property is classified based on its level of utilization -- from Fully Utilized Municipal Use to Surplus. In addition, in 2015 and 2016, in conjunction with CBO, OPI, and OH, FAS has been reviewing properties with the HALA recommendation on using surplus property for housing. The attached list has a new column that groups excess, surplus, underutilized and interim use properties into categories to help differentiate the potential for various sites. Below is a matrix which explains the categorization: Category Description Difficult building site Small, steep and/or irregular parcels with limited development opportunity Future Use Identified use in the future
    [Show full text]
  • The Cape Verde Project: Teaching Ecologically Sensitive and Socially
    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations August 2014 The aC pe Verde Project: Teaching Ecologically Sensitive and Socially Responsive Design N Jonathan Unaka University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the Architecture Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, and the Science and Mathematics Education Commons Recommended Citation Unaka, N Jonathan, "The aC pe Verde Project: Teaching Ecologically Sensitive and Socially Responsive Design" (2014). Theses and Dissertations. 572. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/572 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TEACHING ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE AND SOCIALLY RESPONSIVE DESIGN THE CAPE VERDE PROJECT by N Jonathan Unaka A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee August, 2014 Abstract TEACHING ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE AND SOCIALLY RESPONSIVE DESIGN THE CAPE VERDE PROJECT by N Jonathan Unaka The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, August, 2014 Under the Supervision of Professor D Michael Utzinger This dissertation chronicles an evolving teaching philosophy. It was an attempt to develop a way to teach ecological design in architecture informed by ethical responses to ecological devastation and social injustice. The world faces numerous social and ecological challenges at global scales. Recent Industrialization has brought about improved life expectancies and human comforts, coinciding with expanded civic rights and personal freedom, and increased wealth and opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • REFERENCE LIST Status Report: Focus on Staple Crops
    AGRA (Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa). 2013. Africa Agriculture REFERENCE LIST Status Report: Focus on Staple Crops. Nairobi: AGRA. http://agra-alliance.org/ AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science). 2012. download/533977a50dbc7/. “Statement by the AAAS Board of Directors on Labeling of Genetically AgResearch. 2016. “Shortlist of Five Holds Key to Reduced Methane Modified Foods.” Emissions from Livestock.” AgResearch News Release. http://www. Abalos, D., S. Jeffery, A. Sanz-Cobena, G. Guardia, and A. Vallejo. 2014. agresearch.co.nz/news/shortlist-of-five-holds-key-to-reduced-methane- “Meta-analysis of the Effect of Urease and Nitrification Inhibitors on Crop emissions-from-livestock/. Productivity and Nitrogen Use Efficiency.” Agriculture, Ecosystems, and AHDB (Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board). 2017. “Average Milk Environment 189: 136–144. Yield.” Farming Data. https://dairy.ahdb.org.uk/resources-library/market- Abalos, D., S. Jeffery, C.F. Drury, and C. Wagner-Riddle. 2016. “Improving information/farming-data/average-milk-yield/#.WV0_N4jyu70. Fertilizer Management in the U.S. and Canada for N O Mitigation: 2 Ahmed, S.E., A.C. Lees, N.G. Moura, T.A. Gardner, J. Barlow, J. Ferreira, and R.M. Understanding Potential Positive and Negative Side-Effects on Corn Yields.” Ewers. 2014. “Road Networks Predict Human Influence on Amazonian Bird Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 221: 214–221. Communities.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 281 (1795): 20141742. Abbott, P. 2012. “Biofuels, Binding Constraints and Agricultural Commodity Ahrends, A., P.M. Hollingsworth, P. Beckschäfer, H. Chen, R.J. Zomer, L. Zhang, Price Volatility.” Paper presented at the National Bureau of Economic M.
    [Show full text]
  • Composting Toilets
    Advanced Methods and Materials AMM201 Composting Toilets This Advanced Method and Material was developed jointly by the City of Bellingham SCOPE Building Department and Sustainable Connections to enhance water conservation ef- All habitable build- forts by providing a means for the installation of composting toilets. ings. DEFINITIONS Composting toilet: A BENEFITS human waste disposal system that utilizes a Composting toilets can help achieve zero waterless or low-fl ush toilet in conjunction water consumption. When used in com- with a tank in which bination with wastewater re-utilization aerobic bacteria break in irrigation and other household water down the waste. reduction techniques, costs can be cut by up to 60%. Additional benefi ts of com- PERMIT posting toilets include: REQUIREMENTS In general, the person Lower electricity costs (to pump water installing the com- and sewage) posting toilet obtains any required permits. Elimination of infrastructure costs For specifi c informa- to provide fresh water or collect and tion applicants should treat sewage contact the COB End state is a valuable fertilizer Permit Center/Build- ing Services Division Contribute up to 3 LEED® points for for more information: your project (360) 778-8300 or [email protected]. The average household spends as much as $500 per year on its water and sewer bill. A four-person household using a traditional 3.5 gallon fl ush toilet will fl ush some 70 gallons per day down the toilet (that’s an annual volume of over 25,000 gallons per year). Compared to sewage systems, on-site composting and greywater treatment has less impact on the environment (large effl uent releases into watercourses and oceans are avoided, disruption to soils systems through pipeline installation is eliminated and leakage of raw sewage into groundwater through pipe deterioration and breakage is eliminated).
    [Show full text]