DOCSLIB.ORG

Sustainable Sanitation Systems: Health, Environment and Governance Challenges

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sustainable Sanitation Systems: Health, Environment and Governance Challenges Sustainable Sanitation Systems: Health, Environment and Governance Challenges The Case of Human Rights-Based Policy Reform in Alternative Wastewater Management Strategies Florian Thevenon WaterLex Highlights WaterLex is an international public interest development Context: About 2.5 billion people Limits: Field awareness campaigns Policy reform: Integrating the Human organization based in Geneva, Switzerland. It is a UN- do not use an improved sanitation and advocacy actions are Rights to Water and Sanitation Water Partner with UN ECOSOC special consultative status. facility, and about 1 billion people encouraged to improve and monitor into policies and regulations, Its mission is to develop sustainable solutions based on practise open defaecation which is water quality and hygiene practices; including for service providers and human rights to improve water governance worldwide, one of the main causes of drinking because wastewater, even when regulators, could therefore be used particularly in regard to consistent water law and policy water pollution and diarrhoea treated, is highly enriched in to increase the access to safely frameworks. It works with an alliance of interested parties incidences. There is an urgent hazardous pollutants. Wastewater managed sanitation services and to improve water-governance frameworks, bringing them need to increase the access to recycling, safe water reclamation achievement of SDG 6. Local and in line with country obligations under international human safely managed sanitation services, and reuse must therefore be national governments therefore rights law. It is an official member of the UN Environment and a need for a paradigm shift regulated and aligned with national need to integrate their national Global Wastewater Initiative. towards affordable technological quality standards or international and international commitments for alternatives; tailored to local and guidelines; for example, FAO improving access to sanitation into WMO Building, 2nd Floor, specific environmental, political and guidelines for the safe reuse of policies, action plans and budgets. 7 bis avenue de la Paix, socio-economic contexts. wastewater in agriculture. 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Strategy: Governments need to T +41 22 900 16 64 Solutions: An option for low income Method: SDG 6 and the human ensure that no-one is left behind, in E [email protected] countries and rural areas, is to rights framework. The Sustainable particular, the most vulnerable and promote wastewater treatment Development Agenda stresses the marginalised communities. States in artificial ponds and lagoons, as importance of “leaving no one also need to assess environmental well as the utilisation of the treated behind”, which is grounded in the impacts on human rights and to effluents for crop irrigation and human rights framework. SDG 6 make environmental information aquaculture. The improvement of for drinking water, sanitation and public, to facilitate participation in sanitation systems is therefore not hygiene furthermore addresses environmental decision-making, and only important for public health, but some normative criteria and to provide access to remedies for also for climate change mitigation principles of the Human Rights environmental harm. Sustainable and adaptation. Moreover, the to Water and Sanitation. In fact, sanitation services should therefore valuation of faecal sludge-derived ensuring that everyone has access to be part of a holistic approach products can offset treatment cost adequate sanitation facilities is not to Integrated Water Resource and act as an incentive to create only fundamental for human dignity Management. Safe wastewater sustainable wastewater treatment and privacy, but also for protecting reuse, and the consideration of The Global Wastewater Initiative and services. Developing market- the quality of drinking water sources; minimum water quantity needed based approaches with business with significant benefits for human for domestic uses and subsistence models can also provide long- health and economic development, agriculture, should all be encouraged The Global Wastewater Initiative is a voluntary multi- term social benefit and profit in a as well as for the protection of at watershed level and from a long- stakeholders platform aiming to provide the foundations sustainable manner. water-related ecosystems (services). term perspective. (including information, tools and policy mechanisms) for partnerships to initiate comprehensive, effective and sustained programmes addressing wastewater management. The Initiative intends to bring a paradigm shift in world water politics; to prevent further pollution and damage and emphasize that wastewater is a valuable resource for future water security. The Secretariat for the Global Wastewater Initiative is provided by the Global Programme of Action for the Protection of the Marine Environment from Land-Based Activities, a UN Environment-administered intergovernmental mechanism. P. O. Box 30552 (00100), Nairobi, Kenya T +254 20 762 5187 E [email protected] © Florian Thevenon © Florian Thevenon List of abbreviations Foreword BOOT Build–Own–Operate–Transfer In 2015, WaterLex published with United BOT Build–Operate–Transfer Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Global Programme of Action for the Protection of the CFU Colony Forming Units Marine Environment from Land-based Activities CLTS Community Led Total Sanitation (GPA), a report providing information about CO2 Carbon Dioxide the good practices for regulating wastewater CSO Civil Society Organisation treatment (UNEP, 2015a). Many reports have been published by international agencies with EAWAG Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology regard to the new 2030 Agenda; and some ECOSAN Ecological Sanitation technical reports exist on low-cost technological EU European Union alternatives to centralised sewers and wastewater FAO Food and Agriculture Organization treatment. However, to date, there is a crucial lack GEMI Global Enhanced Monitoring Initiative on water of international guidelines and public knowledge concerning (i) the technological alternatives to GLASS UN-Water Global Analysis and Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water conventional sewer-based sanitation systems that GPA Global Programme of Action for the Protection of the Marine Environment from require lots of water and are expensive to build, Land-based Activities operate and maintain; and about (ii) the impacts GW2I Global Wastewater Initiative of (partially treated) wastewater effluents on © Scott Harrison(Photoshare) HCES Household-Centred Environmental Sanitation public health, environments and ecosystems functioning. Comprehensive and standardized monitoring methodologies are therefore urgently needed HRWS Human Rights to Water and Sanitation to better evaluate the quality of water and wastewater; as well as for understanding the complex and IWQGES International Water Quality Guidelines for Ecosystems dynamic responses of (aquatic) ecosystems to climate change and environmental degradation. IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ISO International Organization for Standardization The 2030 Agenda which was one of the outcomes from the Rio +20 conference of 2012, and the adoption IWRM Integrated Water Resources Management of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by all member states of the United Nations in 2015, dedicated JMP WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation a goal to water and sanitation (SDG 6: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all) with eight targets, not only focusing on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene; but also MDG Millennium Development Goal on integrated water resources management, water and wastewater quality, and ecosystems protection. NHRI National Human Rights Institutions However, the successful realisation of SDG 6 requires some major and urgent improvements in wastewater OHCHR Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and sanitation (and solid waste) management in many countries, including in institutional capacity and PPP Private Public Partnership effectiveness. There is an imperative need for a paradigm shift towards consideration of technological alternatives which have to be tailored to local and specific environmental, political and socio-economic SDG Sustainable Development Goal contexts. The operation and maintenance approaches need to ensure the management of sanitation UDDT Urine Diverting Dry Toilet infrastructures and services; whereas municipalities should facilitate private sanitation suppliers and UN United Nations installation. The underlying vision of the 2030 Agenda on eliminating inequalities (“Leave no one UNEP United Nations Environment Programme behind”) features the realisation of human rights to safe water and sanitation, with special consideration for the poorest and marginalised communities such as the residents of informal settlements, women UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and children. There is therefore a crucial need of (1) information campaigns to raise sanitation and UN-HABITAT United Nations Human Settlements Programme hygiene awareness, (2) training programs on water and sanitation governance, (3) business solutions for UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund managing faecal waste, and for (4) incorporating the human rights to water and sanitation into policies, VIP Ventilated Improved Pit (VIP) regulations and institutional framework,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reducing the Food Wastage Footprint
    toolkit.xps:Layout 1 13/06/13 11.44 Pagina 3 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-107741-2 (print) E-ISBN 978-92-5-107743-6 (PDF) © FAO 2013 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact- us/licence-request or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/publications) and can be purchased through publications- [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Improved Water and Sanitation on Diarrhea: Evidence from Pooled Ethiopia Demographic and Health Surveys – a Multilevel Mixed-Effects Analysis
    Original Article The effect of improved water and sanitation on diarrhea: Evidence from pooled Ethiopia Demographic and Health Surveys – A multilevel mixed-effects analysis Abera Kumie Abstract Background: In Ethiopia, diarrhoea is the leading cause of illness and hospital admissions among children, and the persistence of diarrheal epidemics in urban and rural areas warrants an exploration of the impact of WASH facilities over recent years. Objective: The study aimed to assess the effect of improved water sources and sanitation on the occurrence of diarrhea in Ethiopia, while controlling for household and child-related factors and accounting for higher-level variables. Methods: A total of 42,282 study subjects were pooled from the four rounds of the Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey. A multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression model was run to identify the effect of water and sanitation on diarrhea, after adjusting for higher-level and confounding factors. SPSS version 24 was used for data management, while Stata version 15.1 was used for descriptive and multilevel analysis. Results: An improved water source was strongly associated with the occurrence of diarrhea in the final model, (AOR 95% CI: 1.02-1.2), while improved sanitation had a marginal association, (AOR 95% CI: 0.87-1.20). The interaction between improved water sources and improved sanitation has maintained the relevance of improved water sources, but not for improved sanitation, on diarrhea. Conclusions and recommendations: Improved water source was a strong predictor of diarrhea. Improved water sources and improved sanitation are both required to get the maximum benefit of reducing diarrhea among children.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping a Healthier Future
    Health Planning Department, Ministry of Health, Uganda Directorate of Water Development, Ministry of Water and Environment, Uganda Uganda Bureau of Statistics International Livestock Research Institute World Resources Institute The Republic of Uganda Health Planning Department MINISTRY OF HEALTH, UGANDA Directorate of Water Development MINISTRY OF WATER AND ENVIRONMENT, UGANDA Uganda Bureau of Statistics Mapping a Healthier Future ISBN: 978-1-56973-728-6 How Spatial Analysis Can Guide Pro-Poor Water and Sanitation Planning in Uganda HEALTH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MINISTRY OF HEALTH, UGANDA Plot 6 Lourdel Road P.O. Box 7272 AUTHORS AND CONTRIBUTORS Kampala, Uganda http://www.health.go.ug/ This publication was prepared by a core team from fi ve institutions: The Health Planning Department at the Ministry of Health (MoH) leads eff orts to provide strategic support Health Planning Department, Ministry of Health, Uganda to the Health Sector in achieving sector goals and objectives. Specifi cally, the Planning Department guides Paul Luyima sector planning; appraises and monitors programmes and projects; formulates, appraises and monitors Edward Mukooyo national policies and plans; and appraises regional and international policies and plans to advise the sector Didacus Namanya Bambaiha accordingly. Francis Runumi Mwesigye Directorate of Water Development, Ministry of Water and Environment, Uganda DIRECTORATE OF WATER DEVELOPMENT Richard Cong MINISTRY OF WATER AND ENVIRONMENT, UGANDA Plot 21/28 Port Bell Road, Luzira Clara Rudholm P.O. Box 20026 Disan Ssozi Kampala, Uganda Wycliff e Tumwebaze http://www.mwe.go.ug/MoWE/13/Overview Uganda Bureau of Statistics The Directorate of Water Development (DWD) is the lead government agency for the water and sanitation Thomas Emwanu sector under the Ministry of Water and Environment (MWE) with the mandate to promote and ensure the rational and sustainable utilization, development and safeguard of water resources for social and economic Bernard Justus Muhwezi development, as well as for regional and international peace.
    [Show full text]
  • “Sustainable” Sanitation: Challenges and Opportunities in Urban Areas
    sustainability Review Towards “Sustainable” Sanitation: Challenges and Opportunities in Urban Areas Kim Andersson *, Sarah Dickin and Arno Rosemarin Stockholm Environment Institute, Linnégatan 87D, 115 23 Stockholm, Sweden; [email protected] (S.D.); [email protected] (A.R.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +46-73-707-8609 Academic Editors: Philipp Aerni and Amy Glasmeier Received: 8 June 2016; Accepted: 2 December 2016; Published: 8 December 2016 Abstract: While sanitation is fundamental for health and wellbeing, cities of all sizes face growing challenges in providing safe, affordable and functional sanitation systems that are also sustainable. Factors such as limited political will, inadequate technical, financial and institutional capacities and failure to integrate safe sanitation systems into broader urban development have led to a persistence of unsustainable systems and missed opportunities to tackle overlapping and interacting urban challenges. This paper reviews challenges associated with providing sanitation systems in urban areas and explores ways to promote sustainable sanitation in cities. It focuses on opportunities to stimulate sustainable sanitation approaches from a resource recovery perspective, generating added value to society while protecting human and ecosystem health. We show how, if integrated within urban development, sustainable sanitation has great potential to catalyse action and contribute to multiple sustainable development goals. Keywords: urbanization; sustainable sanitation; resource recovery; urban planning and development; public health 1. Introduction Sanitation is fundamental to healthy and productive urban life, and the provision of sanitation services for fast-growing urban populations is one of the world’s most urgent challenges. Currently, more than 700 million urban residents lack improved sanitation access globally, including 80 million who practise open defecation [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing the Ecological Sanitation: a Review on Technology and Methods
    Journal of Cleaner Production 125 (2016) 1e21 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Cleaner Production journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jclepro Review Constructing the ecological sanitation: a review on technology and methods * Ming Hu, Bin Fan , Hongliang Wang, Bo Qu, Shikun Zhu State Key Laboratory of Environmental Aquatic Chemistry, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China article info abstract Article history: Wastewater often contains valuable resources (e.g. organic matter and nutrients). Different from con- Received 29 April 2014 ventional sanitation approaches, the ecological sanitation (Eco-San) system is based on the closure of Received in revised form material flow cycles to recover resources with minimized demands on other resources. The review 29 February 2016 comprehensively summarized the main components of the Eco-San system (user interface, collection Accepted 2 March 2016 and conveyance, storage and primary treatment, and reuse/disposal), the frequently-used evaluation Available online 15 March 2016 methods, and the framework of evaluation index system. Some typical practical cases were discussed to demonstrate the managerial implications and popularize the applications of the Eco-San system. The Keywords: fi fi Ecological sanitation results show that the Eco-San systems are bene cial to resource ef ciency, agricultural use of the organic Evaluation matters and nutrients, and energy recovery although some shortages exist (e.g. high cost, cultural Wastewater treatment constraints, and complex operation and management). The evaluation methods can help to identify the Sustainability restriction factors, contributing factors and measures to improve the efficiency of the future Eco-San Rural system.
    [Show full text]
  • Aid-Savory-3Rd
    The Animal Improved Dung (AID) plus seeds treatment. Managing livestock, dung beetles and earthworms to disperse rock dusts, fertilizers, beneficial micro- organisms, biochar and seeds to grow forests and food, improve soils and fix carbon and climate. Summary The AID plus seeds treatment is a system of innovations which hastens and enhances succession, increases soil carbon and fertility and grows high biomass vegetation. Soil improvers such as rock dusts, spores of beneficial micro-organisms, mineral fertilizers, biochar and burnt bone (from home-made fuel-efficient stoves) and seeds of fast- growing, deep-rooted plants can be fed to livestock to disperse in their manure. Dung beetles, earthworms and termites further disperse and incorporate the improved dung into the soil and increase the availability of nutrients, while their tunnels improve soil structure including air and water infiltration and root growth. Livestock in a planned grazing system can be used to treat/seed areas such as pastures, orchards, plantations, vegetable garden fallows and to reafforest degraded land. The resulting vegetation produces food and fodder, timber (carbon stored for hundreds of years), and fuel wood which produces charcoal (carbon stored in soil for possibly thousands of years), improves soil by promoting the growth of soil life and adding carbon, reduces erosion, as well as increasing transpiration, cloud formation and precipitation. “...increasing agricultural productivity would not only reduce conversion of wild land to new cropland, but it could return existing cropland back to nature. Increasing agricultural productivity is the single most effective method of preventing habitat loss and fragmentation, and conserving global forests, terrestrial biodiversity and carbon stocks and sinks”.
    [Show full text]
  • Valuing Wastes an Integrated System Analysis of Bioenergy, Ecological Sanitation, and Soil Fertility Management in Smallholder Farming in Karagwe, Tanzania
    Valuing wastes An Integrated System Analysis of Bioenergy, Ecological Sanitation, and Soil Fertility Management in Smallholder Farming in Karagwe, Tanzania vorgelegt von Dipl.-Ing. Ariane Krause geb. in Freiburg i. Brsg. von der Fakult¨at VI – Planen Bauen Umwelt der Technischen Universit¨at Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktorin der Ingenieurwissenschaften - Dr.-Ing. - genehmigte Dissertation Promotionsausschuss: Vorsitzende: Prof. Dr. Eva Nora Paton Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Johann K¨oppel Gutachterin: Prof. Dr. Vera Susanne Rotter (Fak. III) Gutachterin: Prof. Dr. Friederike Lang (Albert-Ludwigs-Universit¨at Freiburg) Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 26. Januar 2018 Berlin 2019 make compost not war Abstract My dissertation had as its starting point the intention of two Tanzanian farmer’s initiatives and their German partners to disseminate sustainable cooking and sanitation technologies to smallholder households in Karagwe District, in northwest Tanzania (TZ). These locally developed and adapted technologies include improved cook stoves (ICS), such as microgasifiers, and a system combining biogas digesters and burners for cooking, as well as urine-diverting dry toilets and thermal sterilization/pasteurization for ecological sanitation (EcoSan). Currently, the most common combination of technologies used for cooking and sanitation in Karagwe smallholdings is a three-stone fire and pit latrine. Switching to the new alternatives could potentially lead to (i) optimized resource consumption, (ii) lower environmental emissions, and (iii) a higher availability of domestic residues for soil fertility management. The latter include biogas slurry from anaerobic digestion, powdery biochar from microgasifiers, and sanitized human excreta from EcoSan facilities. These residues are ‘locally available resources’ that can be used for on-farm material cycling.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Mechanisms for Sustainable Sanitation: Learning from Successful Case Studies 3 Wastewater Management System Arising out of Such Ordinance
    policy brief No. 2018-3 (December) Key Points • Despite improvements Institutional Mechanisms for in access to improved sanitation facilities, improper decentralized Sustainable Sanitation: Learning wastewater management still causes water pollution. • The majority of septic tanks from Successful Case Studies are improperly installed, and the “on-demand” desludging system is proving inefficient. KE Seetha Ram, Senior Consulting Specialist, ADBI • Japan has successfully Kazushi Hashimoto, Advisor, Yachiyo Engineering implemented an effective Nikhil Bugalia, Intern, ADBI and robust institutional framework to test and approve new technologies as well as ensure the proper Even though access to improved sanitation facilities has improved, progress in access installation of decentralized to safely managed sanitation services is still slow. Globally, 4.5 billion people still lack wastewater treatment access to safely managed sanitation (UNICEF and WHO 2017). Such inappropriate facilities. management of excreta is a main source of pollution of public water bodies, • The experiences of Japan, Malaysia, and Indonesia rivers, canals, and ponds, particularly in the urban areas of many Asian developing show that mandatory countries. According to a survey conducted by the Japan International Cooperation desludging is effective. The Agency (2012), in Jakarta, Indonesia, although the share of residents with access case of Dumaguete in the to improved sanitation facilities has reached 87% (85% to septic tanks and 2% to Philippines demonstrates sewerage systems), the rivers in the city are seriously polluted. that highlighting the benefits of an efficiently working sanitation One of the causes of water pollution may be attributed to improper decentralized value chain can improve wastewater management. According to the United Nations Children’s Fund and willingness to pay.
    [Show full text]
  • (JMP) Indicators for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene and Their Association with Linear Growth in Children 6 to 23 Months in East Africa
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article The WHO and UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) Indicators for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene and Their Association with Linear Growth in Children 6 to 23 Months in East Africa Hasina Rakotomanana * , Joel J. Komakech, Christine N. Walters and Barbara J. Stoecker Department of Nutritional Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA; [email protected] (J.J.K.); [email protected] (C.N.W.); [email protected] (B.J.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-(405)-338-5898 Received: 7 August 2020; Accepted: 26 August 2020; Published: 28 August 2020 Abstract: The slow decrease in child stunting rates in East Africa warrants further research to identify the influence of contributing factors such as water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH). This study investigated the association between child length and WASH conditions using the recently revised WHO and UNICEF (United Nations Children’s Fund) Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) indicators. Data from households with infants and young children aged 6–23 months from the Demographic and Health Surveys in Burundi, Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia were used. Associations for each country between WASH conditions and length-for-age z-scores (LAZ) were analyzed using linear regression. Stunting rates were high (>20%) reaching 45% in Burundi. At the time of the most recent Demographic and Health Survey (DHS), more than half of the households in most countries did not have basic or safely managed WASH indicators. Models predicted significantly higher LAZ for children living in households with safely managed drinking water compared to those living in households drinking from surface water in Kenya (β = 0.13, p < 0.01) and Tanzania (β = 0.08, p < 0.05) after adjustment with child, maternal, and household covariates.
    [Show full text]
  • REFERENCE LIST Status Report: Focus on Staple Crops
    AGRA (Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa). 2013. Africa Agriculture REFERENCE LIST Status Report: Focus on Staple Crops. Nairobi: AGRA. http://agra-alliance.org/ AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science). 2012. download/533977a50dbc7/. “Statement by the AAAS Board of Directors on Labeling of Genetically AgResearch. 2016. “Shortlist of Five Holds Key to Reduced Methane Modified Foods.” Emissions from Livestock.” AgResearch News Release. http://www. Abalos, D., S. Jeffery, A. Sanz-Cobena, G. Guardia, and A. Vallejo. 2014. agresearch.co.nz/news/shortlist-of-five-holds-key-to-reduced-methane- “Meta-analysis of the Effect of Urease and Nitrification Inhibitors on Crop emissions-from-livestock/. Productivity and Nitrogen Use Efficiency.” Agriculture, Ecosystems, and AHDB (Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board). 2017. “Average Milk Environment 189: 136–144. Yield.” Farming Data. https://dairy.ahdb.org.uk/resources-library/market- Abalos, D., S. Jeffery, C.F. Drury, and C. Wagner-Riddle. 2016. “Improving information/farming-data/average-milk-yield/#.WV0_N4jyu70. Fertilizer Management in the U.S. and Canada for N O Mitigation: 2 Ahmed, S.E., A.C. Lees, N.G. Moura, T.A. Gardner, J. Barlow, J. Ferreira, and R.M. Understanding Potential Positive and Negative Side-Effects on Corn Yields.” Ewers. 2014. “Road Networks Predict Human Influence on Amazonian Bird Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 221: 214–221. Communities.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 281 (1795): 20141742. Abbott, P. 2012. “Biofuels, Binding Constraints and Agricultural Commodity Ahrends, A., P.M. Hollingsworth, P. Beckschäfer, H. Chen, R.J. Zomer, L. Zhang, Price Volatility.” Paper presented at the National Bureau of Economic M.
    [Show full text]
  • OPHI Country Briefing 2017: Albania
    Albania OPHI Country Briefing June 2017 Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI) www.ophi.org.uk Oxford Department of International Development Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford OPHI Country Briefing 2017: Albania Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) At a Glance This Country Briefing presents the results of the Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) and explains key findings graphically. For a full explanation of the MPI, along with more information, international comparisons and details of the resources available in the MPI Databank, please see www.ophi.org.uk/multidimensional-poverty-index/ Please cite this document as: Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (2017). “Albania Country Briefing”, Multidimensional Poverty Index Data Bank. OPHI, University of Oxford. Available at: www.ophi.org.uk/multidimensional-poverty-index/mpi-country-briefings/. For information on updates to the MPI methodology, see Alkire, S. and Robles, G. (2017), “Multidimensional Poverty Index 2017: Brief Methodological Note and Results”. Available at: www.ophi.org.uk/multidimensional-poverty-index /. For information on the original MPI methodology, see Alkire, S. and Santos, M.E. (2014), “Measuring Acute Poverty in the Developing World: Robustness and Scope of the Multidimensional Poverty Index”, World Development 59 (2014) 251-274. A free version of this paper is available at http://www.ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/ophi-wp-591.pdf Inside the MPI The Global MPI has three dimensions and 10 indicators, which are shown in the box below. Each dimension is equally weighted, each indicator within a dimension is also equally weighted, and these weights are shown in brackets within the diagram. Details of the indicators can be found at the back of this briefing.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrients Dynamics and Uptake/Remobilisation in Sediment
    UNESCO-IHE INSTITUTE FOR WATER EDUCATION Multi-criteria analysis of options for urban sanitation and urban agriculture -Case study in Accra (Ghana) and in Lima (Peru)- N.K. De Silva MSc Thesis MWI 2007-01 April 2007 Multi-criteria analysis of options for urban sanitation and urban agriculture -Case study in Accra (Ghana) and in Lima (Peru)- Master of Science research by N.K. De Silva Supervisor Prof. Gary Amy Mentors Dr. Elisabeth von Münch Dr. Adriaan Mels Examinations Committee Prof. Gary Army Dr. Elisabeth von Münch Dr. Adriaan Mels This research is done for the partial fulfillment of requirements for the Master of Science degree at the UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, the Netherlands Delft April 2007 The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this research study do neither necessarily reflect the views of the UNESCO-IHE, Institution for Water Education, nor of the individual members of the MSc committee, nor of their respective employers. Dedication to My loving parents Abstract The Millennium Development Goal 7 (Ensure environmental sustainability), target number 10 (halve, by 2015, the proportion of people without sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation) was introduced to encourage better solutions for water and sanitation problems in developing countries. The SWITCH (Sustainable Water management Improves Tomorrows Cities’ Health) project, funded by the European Union, aims to provide a sustainable, healthy, and safe urban water system to the people. This research was conducted under sub-theme 4.1 of the SWITCH project (eco-sanitation and decentralised wastewater management in an urban context). Accra in Ghana is a “demonstration city” in the SWITCH project; Lima in Peru is a “study city”.
    [Show full text]