The Native Plant Press
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Food Forests: Their Services and Sustainability
Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development ISSN: 2152-0801 online https://foodsystemsjournal.org Food forests: Their services and sustainability Stefanie Albrecht a * Leuphana University Lüneburg Arnim Wiek b Arizona State University Submitted July 29, 2020 / Revised October 22, 2020, and February 8, 2021 / Accepted Febuary 8, 2021 / Published online July 10, 2021 Citation: Albrecht, S., & Wiek, A (2021). Food forests: Their services and sustainability. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 10(3), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2021.103.014 Copyright © 2021 by the Authors. Published by the Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems. Open access under CC-BY license. Abstract detailed insights on 14 exemplary food forests in Industrialized food systems use unsustainable Europe, North America, and South America, practices leading to climate change, natural gained through site visits and interviews. We resource depletion, economic disparities across the present and illustrate the main services that food value chain, and detrimental impacts on public forests provide and assess their sustainability. The health. In contrast, alternative food solutions such findings indicate that the majority of food forests as food forests have the potential to provide perform well on social-cultural and environmental healthy food, sufficient livelihoods, environmental criteria by building capacity, providing food, services, and spaces for recreation, education, and enhancing biodiversity, and regenerating soil, community building. This study compiles evidence among others. However, for broader impact, food from more than 200 food forests worldwide, with forests need to go beyond the provision of social- cultural and environmental services and enhance a * Corresponding author: Stefanie Albrecht, Doctoral student, their economic viability. -
City of Seattle Edward B
City of Seattle Edward B. Murray, Mayor Finance and Administrative Services Fred Podesta, Director July 25, 2016 The Honorable Tim Burgess Seattle City Hall 501 5th Ave. Seattle, WA 98124 Councilmember Burgess, Attached is an annual report of all real property under City ownership. The annual review supports strategic management of the City’s real estate holdings. Because City needs change over time, the annual review helps create opportunities to find the best municipal use of each property or put it back into the private sector to avoid holding properties without an adopted municipal purpose. Each January, FAS initiates the annual review process. City departments with jurisdiction over real property assure that all recent acquisitions and/or dispositions are accurately represented, and provide current information about each property’s current use, and future use, if identified. Each property is classified based on its level of utilization -- from Fully Utilized Municipal Use to Surplus. In addition, in 2015 and 2016, in conjunction with CBO, OPI, and OH, FAS has been reviewing properties with the HALA recommendation on using surplus property for housing. The attached list has a new column that groups excess, surplus, underutilized and interim use properties into categories to help differentiate the potential for various sites. Below is a matrix which explains the categorization: Category Description Difficult building site Small, steep and/or irregular parcels with limited development opportunity Future Use Identified use in the future -
The Cape Verde Project: Teaching Ecologically Sensitive and Socially
University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations August 2014 The aC pe Verde Project: Teaching Ecologically Sensitive and Socially Responsive Design N Jonathan Unaka University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the Architecture Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, and the Science and Mathematics Education Commons Recommended Citation Unaka, N Jonathan, "The aC pe Verde Project: Teaching Ecologically Sensitive and Socially Responsive Design" (2014). Theses and Dissertations. 572. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/572 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TEACHING ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE AND SOCIALLY RESPONSIVE DESIGN THE CAPE VERDE PROJECT by N Jonathan Unaka A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee August, 2014 Abstract TEACHING ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE AND SOCIALLY RESPONSIVE DESIGN THE CAPE VERDE PROJECT by N Jonathan Unaka The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, August, 2014 Under the Supervision of Professor D Michael Utzinger This dissertation chronicles an evolving teaching philosophy. It was an attempt to develop a way to teach ecological design in architecture informed by ethical responses to ecological devastation and social injustice. The world faces numerous social and ecological challenges at global scales. Recent Industrialization has brought about improved life expectancies and human comforts, coinciding with expanded civic rights and personal freedom, and increased wealth and opportunities. -
Every Drop Counts: Water-Saving Contest Results
Published by the P-Patch Trust WINTER/SPRING 2012 Every drop counts: Water-saving contest results Article and photos by Nate Moxley Second place: Hazel Heights water gurus provided an adequate supply of watering cans and added signage encouraging gardeners to use water from the underground Contest? What contest? water cistern. Last year’s water-saving contest, running between June and October, was a worthwhile effort for the P-Patch Program. The impetus was to promote innovative approaches to water conservation with the goal of saving both water and money. Results varied from site to site with a variety of factors that affect water consumption, including weather, leaks, garden expansion and participation levels. The contest encompassed two approaches: water savings and innovative ideas for water conservation. In each category, the top three gardens received a prize. First prize in each category was a $100 gift certificate to Greenwood Hardware. Second-place gardens got a variety pack of new tools, and third-place winners received a copy of Seattle Tilth’s Maritime Northwest Garden Guide. Thanks to all of the sites that participated in the contest. You not only spread water conservation awareness but also reduced the P-Patch Program’s water costs. Contest results Category 1: Overall water savings In all, 30 gardens decreased their water consumption as compared to last year. Even though the P-Patch program brought new gardens online during the contest period, we achieved an overall reduction in water use of nearly 20,000 gallons from the year before. This outcome shows that when gardeners take an active role in water conservation, results can be significant. -
Institutional Politics, Power Constellations, and Urban Social Sustainability: a Comparative-Historical Analysis Jason M
Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2014 Institutional Politics, Power Constellations, and Urban Social Sustainability: A Comparative-Historical Analysis Jason M. Laguna Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTIONAL POLITICS, POWER CONSTELLATIONS, AND URBAN SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY: A COMPARATIVE-HISTORICAL ANALYSIS By JASON M. LAGUNA A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Sociology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Summer Semester, 2014 Jason M. Laguna defended this dissertation on May 30, 2014. The members of the supervisory committee were: Douglas Schrock Professor Directing Dissertation Andy Opel University Representative Jill Quadagno Committee Member Daniel Tope Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii This is dedicated to all the friends, family members, and colleagues whose help and support made this possible. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. vi Abstract ....................................................................................................................................... -
Producing Edible Landscapes in Seattle's Urban Forest Rebecca J
Ursinus College Digital Commons @ Ursinus College Environmental Studies Faculty Publications Environmental Studies Department 2012 Producing Edible Landscapes in Seattle's Urban Forest Rebecca J. McLain Portland State University Melissa R. Poe Northwest Sustainability Institute Patrick T. Hurley Ursinus College, [email protected] Joyce LeCompte University of Washington Marla R. Emery USDA Forest Service Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/environment_fac Part of the Environmental Studies Commons, Food Security Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, Other Political Science Commons, Place and Environment Commons, Sustainability Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits oy u. Recommended Citation McLain, Rebecca J.; Poe, Melissa R.; Hurley, Patrick T.; LeCompte, Joyce; and Emery, Marla R., "Producing Edible Landscapes in Seattle's Urban Forest" (2012). Environmental Studies Faculty Publications. 7. https://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/environment_fac/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Environmental Studies Department at Digital Commons @ Ursinus College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Environmental Studies Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Ursinus College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 11 (2012) 187–194 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect -
Locally Sourcedsourced
InsideAgroforestryVOLUME 22 ISSUE 2 LocallyLocally SourcedSourced When we think about agroforestry, the production side of agroforestry – the trees, crops, and livestock that make up agroforestry systems – Inside is often what we think of first, not the economics or products. Plant a Many publications address the ecology The articles in this newsletter aren’t meant Tree of Life and management of agroforestry systems or to be comprehensive. There are many 4 their ecological benefits. Others focus on agroforestry systems not mentioned here the ecological benefits of these agroforestry that produce important food products, like FOOD HUB FACTS Food hubs manage the aggregation, practices, such as improved water, soils, meat from silvopasture systems and grain distribution and marketing of source-identified products primarily from local and regional = 5 producers producers to strengthen their ability to satisfy and wildlife habitat. Food sometimes gets from fields protected by windbreaks. Instead, wholesale, retail, and institutional demand. overlooked, even though its production is this newsletter tries to get us thinking about often a primary driver for landowners. emerging agroforestry markets and systems. Median number of producers The Emerging Role or suppliers per food hub This newsletter seeks to highlight the It addresses agroforestry in places where of Food Hubs 6 62% of food hubs FOOD HUB surveyed began foods that agroforestry producers grow. It we don’t traditionally think of them, like operations within also addresses how agroforestry producers backyards, and discusses new species that the last 5 years 62% Customers are usually within fit into food systems at different scales. can be grown in more traditional agroforestry 400 miles of the food hub In addition to being a component of the systems, like hazelnuts in windbreaks. -
2012 City Fruit Annual Report
2012 Annual Report Introduction Seattle boasted a bumper crop of fruit in 2012. Weather. Community support. Experienced harvesters. All conspired to ensure that more fruit was harvested in Seattle than ever before. City Fruit brought in 18,000 pounds from three Seattle neighborhoods. This good news represents one side of the equation. On the other side, lines at Seattle food banks grew longer than ever. One of our recipients, the Rainier Valley Food Bank, is one of Seattle’s busiest, serving 11,000 people a month. Nearly 25 percent of the children in Washington don’t get enough to eat. The statistics go on and on, drilling home the fact that fruit doesn’t belong on the ground: Seattle-grown plums, apples, pears, grapes and crabapples belong in boxes -- on a delivery route – to people who are hungry. While harvesting and distributing urban fruit remained at the core of our mission, City Fruit continued to develop the infrastructure and services needed for a viable urban food system. Specifically, we have: developed a range of revenue streams, including an expanding member base, community sponsors and partners, product sales, classes, events, and donations, in addition to grants; maintained a roster of active orchard stewards who ultimately harvested hundreds of pounds of fruit from community trees -- trees that few knew existed just three years ago; developed a state-of-the art CRM system (Salesforce) that generates harvest histories of fruit trees going back four years and allows us to manage data on fruit trees, harvests, tree owners, classes, community contacts – you name it – efficiently and accurately; planted dozens of fruit trees and berry bushes in the Rainier Valley. -
King Conservation District Funding Invested in the City of Seattle
KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT FUNDING INVESTED IN THE CITY OF SEATTLE GRANT AWARDS KCD awards grants to local governments, nonprofit organizations, tribes, and other agencies to improve natural resources and increase regional conservation. KCD funds for projects listed below were collected from an annual, per-parcel assessment or rate and charge for projects in partnership with Member Jurisdictions and/or the three watershed forums. These monies support high-impact projects in both urban and rural areas and often leverage funding from state, federal, and other sources. For more information on these projects or about the grant programs, please contact Jessica Saavedra at 425-282-1906 or e-mail [email protected]. www.kingcd.org Social icon Rounded square Only use blue and/or white. For more details check out our SERVICES In addition to the conservation services and cost share awards listed below, KCD also provides services to cities Brand Guidelines. and residents in shoreline restoration, community agriculture and urban forestry. Summary of KCD–Seattle Member Jurisdiction Funding Available for Grants or Services 2014-2017 Rates and Charges Collections $1,493,899.67 2018 Rates and Charges Collections $375,940.52 Total Collections $1,869,840.19 Total Utilized to Date (since 1994) $6,704,689.92 Estimated 2019 Rates and Charges Collections $374,000.00 Estimated Total Amount Available to Utilize for Grants or Services (including estimated 2019 collections, subject to change) $379,776.60 King ConservationKing District Conservation • 1107 SW District Grady • Way, Renton, Suite WA 130 98057 • Renton, • 425-282-1900 WA 98057 • 425-282-1900www.kingcd.org • www.kingcd.org \\king-fs1\admin\Assessment\Seattle\City Outreach Information\2019_SeattleCityOutreachDoc_Stapled.indd January 23, 2019 5:26 PM KCD–Seattle Member Jurisdiction Grants Awarded In partnership with the City of Seattle’s Office of Sustainability and Environment, KCD accepts proposals from community organizations each year. -
Food Is Medicine
Published by the P-Patch Trust SUMMER 2013 Food is Medicine Article by Ilene S. Ruhoy, M.D., Ph.D., indoles; orange represents carotenes and pressure but my love of cabbage is due tomatoes contain key vitamins such a B1, Photos by Grete Martinson xanthophylls; red represents lycopene and to its ability to stimulate glutathione. B2, B3, B5, B6, K and minerals such as anthocyanins; blue represents resveratrol Glutathione is an important antioxidant potassium, manganese and iron. Twelve Most of us look around at our garden and anthocyanins; and white represents that plays a role in liver detoxification. percent of the calories in a tomato are from and rejoice at the wonderful vegetables and allyl sulfides and anthoxanthins. So if A detoxed liver is a healthy liver and is protein content. Tomatoes are important fruits the soil brings us. Perhaps we think your daily diet has many colors you are better equipped to remove fat-soluble to reduce cancer risk, cardiovascular risk of the delectable additions to our meals sure to be getting a variety of nutrients toxins. Cabbage can also be useful in acute and overall inflammation but also regulate this bounty will provide. But I invite you and vitamins. But knowing the impact of treatments of migraines. neurotransmitters such as dopamine, to redefine your paradigm on our fruits and specific foods on our health is important so serotonin and norepinephrine. vegetables and instead view them as the let’s briefly review some that are popular LETTUCE Lettuce gets a bad rap as medicinal foods they are. amongst the P-Patch gardens. -
Developing an Ecological Sanitation Transect
University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses Dissertations and Theses March 2016 Developing An Ecological Sanitation Transect Ian Kolesinskas University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/masters_theses_2 Part of the Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Commons, Environmental Design Commons, Environmental Engineering Commons, Food Security Commons, Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Kolesinskas, Ian, "Developing An Ecological Sanitation Transect" (2016). Masters Theses. 327. https://doi.org/10.7275/7975054 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/masters_theses_2/327 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEVELOPING AN ECOLOGICAL SANITATION TRANSECT A Thesis Presented By IAN JAMES KOLESINSKAS Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF REGIONAL PLANNING February 2016 Master of Regional Planning Program DEVELOPING AN ECOLOGICAL SANITATION TRANSECT A Thesis Presented By IAN JAMES KOLESINSKAS Approved as to style and content by: Robert Ryan, Chair Wayne Feiden, Member Mark Hamin, Member Elisabeth Hamin, Department Head Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning DEDICATION For my grandmother, Audrey Schurmann. Rest in peace. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee chair, Robert Ryan, for his guidance and interest in my research. Thank you to Wayne Feiden for being a member of my committee as well as a planner to look up to. -
Matilda Cresswell-Cox
A Study Tour of The Pacific Northwest: Horticulture’s Role in the Health and Wellbeing of Plants and People Matilda Cresswell Cox July - August 2019 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 2 Aims & Objectives ........................................................................................................................ 2 Itinerary ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Sites Visited.................................................................................................................................. 4 Nurseries & Ecological Restoration ......................................................................................... 4 Society for Ecological Restoration- UW Native Plant Nursery ............................................ 4 Matt Albright Native Plant Centre & Elwah Dam Restoration ........................................... 6 Oxbow Farm & Conservation Centre.................................................................................. 8 Natural Areas......................................................................................................................... 10 Hoh Rainforest ................................................................................................................. 10 Mount St Helen National Volcanic Monument ...............................................................