Rescue on El Diente -- Contributed by Jean Aschenbrenner Handful of Easy 14Ers
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico
Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico William H. Romme, M. Lisa Floyd, David Hanna with contributions by Elisabeth J. Bartlett, Michele Crist, Dan Green, Henri D. Grissino-Mayer, J. Page Lindsey, Kevin McGarigal, & Jeffery S.Redders Produced by the Colorado Forest Restoration Institute at Colorado State University, and Region 2 of the U.S. Forest Service May 12, 2009 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY … p 5 AUTHORS’ AFFILIATIONS … p 16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS … p 16 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION A. Objectives and Organization of This Report … p 17 B. Overview of Physical Geography and Vegetation … p 19 C. Climate Variability in Space and Time … p 21 1. Geographic Patterns in Climate 2. Long-Term Variability in Climate D. Reference Conditions: Concept and Application … p 25 1. Historical Range of Variability (HRV) Concept 2. The Reference Period for this Analysis 3. Human Residents and Influences during the Reference Period E. Overview of Integrated Ecosystem Management … p 30 F. Literature Cited … p 34 CHAPTER II. PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS A. Vegetation Structure and Composition … p 39 B. Reference Conditions … p 40 1. Reference Period Fire Regimes 2. Other agents of disturbance 3. Pre-1870 stand structures C. Legacies of Euro-American Settlement and Current Conditions … p 67 1. Logging (“High-Grading”) in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 2. Excessive Livestock Grazing in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 3. Fire Exclusion Since the Late 1800s 4. Interactions: Logging, Grazing, Fire, Climate, and the Forests of Today D. Summary … p 83 E. Literature Cited … p 84 CHAPTER III. -
Colorado Fourteeners Checklist
Colorado Fourteeners Checklist Rank Mountain Peak Mountain Range Elevation Date Climbed 1 Mount Elbert Sawatch Range 14,440 ft 2 Mount Massive Sawatch Range 14,428 ft 3 Mount Harvard Sawatch Range 14,421 ft 4 Blanca Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,351 ft 5 La Plata Peak Sawatch Range 14,343 ft 6 Uncompahgre Peak San Juan Mountains 14,321 ft 7 Crestone Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,300 ft 8 Mount Lincoln Mosquito Range 14,293 ft 9 Castle Peak Elk Mountains 14,279 ft 10 Grays Peak Front Range 14,278 ft 11 Mount Antero Sawatch Range 14,276 ft 12 Torreys Peak Front Range 14,275 ft 13 Quandary Peak Mosquito Range 14,271 ft 14 Mount Evans Front Range 14,271 ft 15 Longs Peak Front Range 14,259 ft 16 Mount Wilson San Miguel Mountains 14,252 ft 17 Mount Shavano Sawatch Range 14,231 ft 18 Mount Princeton Sawatch Range 14,204 ft 19 Mount Belford Sawatch Range 14,203 ft 20 Crestone Needle Sangre de Cristo Range 14,203 ft 21 Mount Yale Sawatch Range 14,200 ft 22 Mount Bross Mosquito Range 14,178 ft 23 Kit Carson Mountain Sangre de Cristo Range 14,171 ft 24 Maroon Peak Elk Mountains 14,163 ft 25 Tabeguache Peak Sawatch Range 14,162 ft 26 Mount Oxford Collegiate Peaks 14,160 ft 27 Mount Sneffels Sneffels Range 14,158 ft 28 Mount Democrat Mosquito Range 14,155 ft 29 Capitol Peak Elk Mountains 14,137 ft 30 Pikes Peak Front Range 14,115 ft 31 Snowmass Mountain Elk Mountains 14,099 ft 32 Windom Peak Needle Mountains 14,093 ft 33 Mount Eolus San Juan Mountains 14,090 ft 34 Challenger Point Sangre de Cristo Range 14,087 ft 35 Mount Columbia Sawatch Range -
Climate on the Blanca Massif, Sangre De Cristo Mountains, Colorado, USA, During the Last Glacial Maximum
quaternary Article Climate on the Blanca Massif, Sangre de Cristo Mountains, Colorado, USA, during the Last Glacial Maximum Keith A. Brugger 1,* , Eric M. Leonard 2, Kurt A. Refsnider 3 and Peter Dolan 4 1 Geology Discipline, University of Minnesota, Morris, MN 56267, USA 2 Department of Geology, Colorado College, Colorado Springs, CO 80903, USA; [email protected] 3 101 W Goodwin St #3849, Prescott, AZ 86302, USA; [email protected] 4 Statistics and Computer Science Disciplines, University of Minnesota, Morris, MN 56267, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Temperature-index modeling is used to determine the magnitude of temperature de- pression on the Blanca Massif, Colorado, required to maintain steady-state mass balances of nine reconstructed glaciers at their extent during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). The mean temperature depression thus determined is ~8.6 +0.7/−0.9 ◦C where the uncertainties account for those inherent in the glacier reconstructions, in model parameters (e.g., melt factors), and possible modest changes in LGM precipitation. Associated equilibrium-line altitudes (ELAs) exhibit a statistically significant directional dependency being lower toward the north and east. Under the assumption that regional temperature change was uniform, required changes in precipitation vary systematically—also exhibit- ing a directional dependency coinciding with that in ELAs—and indicate increases (over modern) occurred on the eastern side of the massif while decreases occurred on the western side. This disparity represents a strengthening of a precipitation asymmetry, particularly winter precipitation, which Citation: Brugger, K.A.; Leonard, E.M.; Refsnider, K.A.; Dolan, P. -
James Peak Wilderness Lakes
James Peak Wilderness Lakes FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT DATA Benjamin Swigle - Aquatic Biologist (Fort Collins/Boulder) [email protected] / 970-472-4364 General Information: The James Peak Wilderness encompasses 17,000 acres on the east side of the Continental Divide in Boulder, Gilpin, and Clear Creek Counties of Colorado. There is approximately 20 miles of trail. The area's elevation ranges from 9,200 to 13,294 feet. Stocking the lakes is primarily completed by CPW pilots that deliver 1 inch native cutthroat trout. Location: Nearby Towns: Nederland, Rollinsville, Tolland, Winter Park. Recreational Management: United States Forest Service Purchase a fishing license: https://www.co.wildlifelicense.com/start.php Fishery Management: Coldwater angling Amenities Sportfishing Notes Previous Stocking High Mountain Hiking 2014 Cutthroat Camping sites available Native Cutthroat Trout Following ice off, trout enter a Backcountry camping 2-3 month feeding frenzy to available with permit June 1 – 2012 fuel themselves over long September 15. Native Cutthroat Trout winters. Consult a quality map for Scuds make up a large portion further information. 2010 of their diet. Primitive restrooms at some Native Cutthroat Trout Fly anglers and spinning rigs trailheads generally offer equal success. 2008 Regulations Native Cutthroat Trout Brook Trout Possession or use of live fish In some James Peak for bait is not permitted. 2006 Wilderness Lakes brook trout Statewide bag/possession Native Cutthroat Trout severely outcompete native limits apply (see -
Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21 -
All Grants Awarded Through Fiscal Year 2020 INTRODUCTION and KEY
All Grants Awarded Through Fiscal Year 2020 INTRODUCTION AND KEY This report is a list of all grants awarded by the Colorado Historical Society’s State Historical Fund (SHF) since its inception in 1992 (state Fiscal Year 1993) through the end of Fiscal Year 2020. The amounts listed are the original award amounts. If for some reason the entire grant amount was not used (i.e. a project was terminated or was completed under budget) the full amount awarded will appear. In other instances grant awards were increased either to enable project completion or to cover the costs of easements. In these instances, the additional award amount is shown in a separate entry as an increase. In those cases where no work was accomplished and the funds were either declined by the grant recipient or were required to be returned to the SHF through rescissions, no entry will appear. For this reason, projects listed in one version of this report may not appear in later versions, and the financial information shown in this report may not be comparable to other revenue reports issued by the SHF. Grants listed in this report are identified by project ID number. The first two characters in the project ID number represent the fiscal year from which the grant was scheduled to be paid. The state is on a July 1 – June 30 fiscal year. So, for example, all grants made between July 1, 2006 and June 30, 2007 will be coded “07”. The next two characters identify the type of grant. In the case of grants that are awarded based on specific application due dates, the grant round in which the project was funded will be paired with either a letter or number. -
The Geologic Story of Colorado's Sangre De Cristo Range
The Geologic Story of Colorado’s Sangre de Cristo Range Circular 1349 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover shows a landscape carved by glaciers. Front cover, Crestone Peak on left and the three summits of Kit Carson Mountain on right. Back cover, Humboldt Peak on left and Crestone Needle on right. Photograph by the author looking south from Mt. Adams. The Geologic Story of Colorado’s Sangre de Cristo Range By David A. Lindsey A description of the rocks and landscapes of the Sangre de Cristo Range and the forces that formed them. Circular 1349 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 This and other USGS information products are available at http://store.usgs.gov/ U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 To learn about the USGS and its information products visit http://www.usgs.gov/ 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Lindsey, D.A., 2010, The geologic story of Colorado’s Sangre de Cristo Range: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1349, 14 p. iii Contents The Oldest Rocks ...........................................................................................................................................1 -
Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017 -
Sangre De Cristo Salida and San Carlos Wet Mountains San Carlos Spanish Peaks San Carlos
Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District -
ROADLESS AREA CONSERVATION: NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LANDS in COLORADO, Proposed Rule
ROADLESS AREA CONSERVATION: NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LANDS IN COLORADO, Proposed Rule Regulatory Impact Analysis And Cost-Benefit Analysis USDA Forest Service July 16, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................................................4 BACKGROUND........................................................................................................................................................25 PURPOSE AND NEED.............................................................................................................................................26 PROPOSED RULE AND ALTERNATIVES .........................................................................................................28 ROADLESS AREA BOUNDARIES ...............................................................................................................................28 ALTERNATIVES........................................................................................................................................................31 IMPLICATIONS OF RELATED PLANNING EFFORTS AND FEDERAL DIRECTION (DONE) ..............38 METHODOLOGY, DATA, AND ASSUMPTIONS...............................................................................................41 SCOPE OF ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................................41 Benefits and Costs..............................................................................................................................................42 -
Gilpin County Brochure
RECREATIONAL INFORMATION GILPIN COUNTY Colorado Golden Gate Canyon State Park: Gilpin County Administration GILPIN COUNTY parks.state.co.us/Parks/goldengatecanyon 203 Eureka Street 303-582-3707 Post Office Box 366 a rural mountain community Central City, Colorado, 80427 303-582-5214 phone USDA Forest Service 303-582-5440 fax Arapaho & Roosevelt National Forest: www.fs.fed.us/r2/arnf/ Gilpincounty.org 970-295-6600 Photographs courtesy of the Forest Service, (local) Clear Creek District: Gilpin Historical Society, J. Simpson, 303-567-2901 J. Sturenberg, C. Takahashi, N. West, J. West. Cover Photographs: Gilpin Historical Society Museum: Gilpin County view of James Peak www.gilpinhistory.org Winter scene 303-582-5283 Autumn aspen Local Indian paintbrush Central City Opera: www.centralcityopera.org 303-292-6500 Gilpin County Community Recreation Center and pools: Gilpincounty.org / 303-582-1453 Gilpin County Administration: Gilpincounty.org / 303-582-5214 co.gilpin.co.us 303-582-5214 10/2018 Life in the High Country Gilpin County is a rural Residents community in Colorado’s high country, Gilpin residents enjoy a quality of life Events neighboring the continental divide, yet enhanced by rural neighborhoods nestled Our recreation center and fairgrounds are host less than an hour west of downtown amongst scenic natural beauty, low taxes, and to many fun and educational programs for Denver. Gilpin County is host to vast a financially secure local government. The children, adults and families. Annual events, recreational opportunities offered by county’s close proximity to the Denver metro such as the Golden Gate State Park, the Arapaho and area adds relative convenience to a rural county fair, flea Roosevelt National Forests, the limited mountain life, and the variety of community market, fall and stakes gaming in the cities events and winter festivals of Black Hawk and Central, programs, the new not only add to and a recreation center, the the excitement, state-of-the-art local school systems, but are free to recreation public library and the public. -
Hello, Planner and Planning Commission: I Would
From: Suzanne Webel To: #LandUsePlanner Subject: Eldora Parking Docket SU-19-0006 BATCO Response Date: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 12:16:27 PM Attachments: EMR Parking Access Recommendation.doc Hello, Planner and Planning Commission: I would like the attached material and recommendation from BATCO to be sent to the Planning Commission with regard to the proposed expansion of the parking area at Eldorado Mountain Resort, prior to their Dec. 18 meeting. We have been trying to get trail access and trailhead parking utilizing existing trails and their parking lot for 40 years (!). Now is the time to get it done, and we would appreciate YOUR support. As indicated at the end of the letter, I will be unable to attend the meeting because I am getting my life in order for some major surgery this week. Please let me know that you have received this document and will include it for the Planning Commission's consideration for tomorrow's meeting, and if you need any additional information. I would also appreciate being included in further communications regarding this project, and would be happy to talk further by phone now and to meet in person in early January. Thanks Suzanne Webel President, Boulder Area Trails Coalition (BATCO) 303-485-2162 Eldora Mountain Resort Summer Parking Request Docket SU-19-0006 December 18, 2019 Boulder County Planning Commission Arapaho Roosevelt National Forest Boulder Ranger District Boulder County Parks & Open Space Boulder County Commissioners These could be exciting times for public land managers to execute a spectacular vision for non-motorized trails in Boulder County west of Nederland; indeed, now is the ONLY time you will be able to do so.