DOCSLIB.ORG

Hello, Planner and Planning Commission: I Would

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hello, Planner and Planning Commission: I Would From: Suzanne Webel To: #LandUsePlanner Subject: Eldora Parking Docket SU-19-0006 BATCO Response Date: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 12:16:27 PM Attachments: EMR Parking Access Recommendation.doc Hello, Planner and Planning Commission: I would like the attached material and recommendation from BATCO to be sent to the Planning Commission with regard to the proposed expansion of the parking area at Eldorado Mountain Resort, prior to their Dec. 18 meeting. We have been trying to get trail access and trailhead parking utilizing existing trails and their parking lot for 40 years (!). Now is the time to get it done, and we would appreciate YOUR support. As indicated at the end of the letter, I will be unable to attend the meeting because I am getting my life in order for some major surgery this week. Please let me know that you have received this document and will include it for the Planning Commission's consideration for tomorrow's meeting, and if you need any additional information. I would also appreciate being included in further communications regarding this project, and would be happy to talk further by phone now and to meet in person in early January. Thanks Suzanne Webel President, Boulder Area Trails Coalition (BATCO) 303-485-2162 Eldora Mountain Resort Summer Parking Request Docket SU-19-0006 December 18, 2019 Boulder County Planning Commission Arapaho Roosevelt National Forest Boulder Ranger District Boulder County Parks & Open Space Boulder County Commissioners These could be exciting times for public land managers to execute a spectacular vision for non-motorized trails in Boulder County west of Nederland; indeed, now is the ONLY time you will be able to do so. It is within your grasp to create the true crown jewel of a trail system in the Eldora-Tolland area. You can do it with just a few bold strokes! Please don’t let this once-in-many-lifetimes opportunity slip away. You can get this process started now by approving the Eldorado Mountain Resort’s request for expanded winter parking ONLY if they agree to allow summer parking for non-motorized recreationists at their enormous parking lot. We urge you to step back and look at the big picture – not just at the Eldora Mountain Resort in isolation. The map attached offers you that opportunity. Look, please, really look, at how all the key elements are already there. The Ski Resort and the Toll Ranch offer unprecedented opportunities for new regional trails. It is literally a matter of connecting the dots. But recreationists have long been stymied by a lack of public access and parking. If we could get both by working with EMR, the Forest Service, and Boulder County we’d be able to accomplish the dream. BATCO ♦ P.O. Box 19726 ♦ Boulder, CO 80308-2726 www.bouldertrails.org Regional Context. The map attached, on the USGS topographic base, shows Forest Service lands and the key parcels that are in play as of this date, as well as existing and proposed trails, trailheads and other amenities. 1) Peterson Lake to Lost Lake / Hessie Bypass. The Hessie Townsite has always been a popular starting point for people wanting to access the Indian Peaks Wilderness. However, limited parking has made this a frustrating experience for almost everyone and an impossibility for equestrians. Residents of the Town of Eldora have become annoyed by the traffic through their neighborhood. Eldora Mountain Resort wants to expand its ski runs and lifts, but has been blocking summer trail access for years. Establishing a summer trailhead in the current very large winter ski area parking lot (“P), as well as a building a new few trails (mostly along ski runs, old roads, and a gas pipeline) to connect that area with the Lost Lake area, would bypass Eldora and Hessie entirely, could be implemented at very low cost and low environmental impact, and would solve all the above problems with one new stroke. 2) West Magnolia to Tolland, Eldora, and Rollins Pass. The West Magnolia trail system has just been restructured into a series of tightly-stacked loop trails that don’t really go anywhere. Just next door, however, is the vast Toll Ranch, which consists of more than 4,000 acres of forests, meadows, mines, and roads. The recent acquisition of the Toll Ranch contains an approved east-west trail that will allow people to get seamlessly from West Magnolia all the way to the Indian Peaks, and from West Magnolia to the Jenny Creek Trail, the Rollins Pass Road, and the James Peak Wilderness. Assuming the Zarlengo Property is also in play, a second stage of trail access along an old road there would create an outstanding long-distance loop for a full-day experience from EMR, East Portal, or West Magnolia. Recommendations. Nonmotorized recreationists desperately need summer parking and access to the trails in this area. The EMR request to expand their already-huge parking facility offers an excellent opportunity to accomplish this objective. BATCO ♦ P.O. Box 19726 ♦ Boulder, CO 80308-2726 www.bouldertrails.org Now is the time to do this right. Please approve their request for more winter parking, but link it with our request to use part of it for summer parking and trail access. The Boulder Area Trails Coalition (BATCO) promotes non-motorized, multi-use, environmentally-responsible trail systems in Boulder County. We were founded in 1996 and are a 501©3 non-profit corporation. Our Trails & Recreation Map of Boulder County is a major fundraiser for trails, and we may provide some funding in 2020 for trail construction on the nearby Toll property. We often make trail funding grants and provide volunteers for trailbuilding, trail maintenance, and trail advocacy on public lands around the county. Please consider BATCO as a resource for multi-use trail and public land management issues. Suzanne Webel President, Boulder Area Trails Coalition (BATCO) PS I apologize for the hand-drawn map and for the fact that I will be unable to attend the Dec. 18 hearing but I am about to undergo major surgery and just can’t do more right now. I would be very happy to explore this topic with you all early in the new year! BATCO ♦ P.O. Box 19726 ♦ Boulder, CO 80308-2726 www.bouldertrails.org BATCO ♦ P.O. Box 19726 ♦ Boulder, CO 80308-2726 www.bouldertrails.org BATCO ♦ P.O. Box 19726 ♦ Boulder, CO 80308-2726 www.bouldertrails.org .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • James Peak Wilderness Lakes
    James Peak Wilderness Lakes FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT DATA Benjamin Swigle - Aquatic Biologist (Fort Collins/Boulder) [email protected] / 970-472-4364 General Information: The James Peak Wilderness encompasses 17,000 acres on the east side of the Continental Divide in Boulder, Gilpin, and Clear Creek Counties of Colorado. There is approximately 20 miles of trail. The area's elevation ranges from 9,200 to 13,294 feet. Stocking the lakes is primarily completed by CPW pilots that deliver 1 inch native cutthroat trout. Location: Nearby Towns: Nederland, Rollinsville, Tolland, Winter Park. Recreational Management: United States Forest Service Purchase a fishing license: https://www.co.wildlifelicense.com/start.php Fishery Management: Coldwater angling Amenities Sportfishing Notes Previous Stocking High Mountain Hiking 2014 Cutthroat Camping sites available Native Cutthroat Trout Following ice off, trout enter a Backcountry camping 2-3 month feeding frenzy to available with permit June 1 – 2012 fuel themselves over long September 15. Native Cutthroat Trout winters. Consult a quality map for Scuds make up a large portion further information. 2010 of their diet. Primitive restrooms at some Native Cutthroat Trout Fly anglers and spinning rigs trailheads generally offer equal success. 2008 Regulations Native Cutthroat Trout Brook Trout Possession or use of live fish In some James Peak for bait is not permitted. 2006 Wilderness Lakes brook trout Statewide bag/possession Native Cutthroat Trout severely outcompete native limits apply (see
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • All Grants Awarded Through Fiscal Year 2020 INTRODUCTION and KEY
    All Grants Awarded Through Fiscal Year 2020 INTRODUCTION AND KEY This report is a list of all grants awarded by the Colorado Historical Society’s State Historical Fund (SHF) since its inception in 1992 (state Fiscal Year 1993) through the end of Fiscal Year 2020. The amounts listed are the original award amounts. If for some reason the entire grant amount was not used (i.e. a project was terminated or was completed under budget) the full amount awarded will appear. In other instances grant awards were increased either to enable project completion or to cover the costs of easements. In these instances, the additional award amount is shown in a separate entry as an increase. In those cases where no work was accomplished and the funds were either declined by the grant recipient or were required to be returned to the SHF through rescissions, no entry will appear. For this reason, projects listed in one version of this report may not appear in later versions, and the financial information shown in this report may not be comparable to other revenue reports issued by the SHF. Grants listed in this report are identified by project ID number. The first two characters in the project ID number represent the fiscal year from which the grant was scheduled to be paid. The state is on a July 1 – June 30 fiscal year. So, for example, all grants made between July 1, 2006 and June 30, 2007 will be coded “07”. The next two characters identify the type of grant. In the case of grants that are awarded based on specific application due dates, the grant round in which the project was funded will be paired with either a letter or number.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017
    [Show full text]
  • ROADLESS AREA CONSERVATION: NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LANDS in COLORADO, Proposed Rule
    ROADLESS AREA CONSERVATION: NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LANDS IN COLORADO, Proposed Rule Regulatory Impact Analysis And Cost-Benefit Analysis USDA Forest Service July 16, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................................................4 BACKGROUND........................................................................................................................................................25 PURPOSE AND NEED.............................................................................................................................................26 PROPOSED RULE AND ALTERNATIVES .........................................................................................................28 ROADLESS AREA BOUNDARIES ...............................................................................................................................28 ALTERNATIVES........................................................................................................................................................31 IMPLICATIONS OF RELATED PLANNING EFFORTS AND FEDERAL DIRECTION (DONE) ..............38 METHODOLOGY, DATA, AND ASSUMPTIONS...............................................................................................41 SCOPE OF ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................................41 Benefits and Costs..............................................................................................................................................42
    [Show full text]
  • Gilpin County Brochure
    RECREATIONAL INFORMATION GILPIN COUNTY Colorado Golden Gate Canyon State Park: Gilpin County Administration GILPIN COUNTY parks.state.co.us/Parks/goldengatecanyon 203 Eureka Street 303-582-3707 Post Office Box 366 a rural mountain community Central City, Colorado, 80427 303-582-5214 phone USDA Forest Service 303-582-5440 fax Arapaho & Roosevelt National Forest: www.fs.fed.us/r2/arnf/ Gilpincounty.org 970-295-6600 Photographs courtesy of the Forest Service, (local) Clear Creek District: Gilpin Historical Society, J. Simpson, 303-567-2901 J. Sturenberg, C. Takahashi, N. West, J. West. Cover Photographs: Gilpin Historical Society Museum: Gilpin County view of James Peak www.gilpinhistory.org Winter scene 303-582-5283 Autumn aspen Local Indian paintbrush Central City Opera: www.centralcityopera.org 303-292-6500 Gilpin County Community Recreation Center and pools: Gilpincounty.org / 303-582-1453 Gilpin County Administration: Gilpincounty.org / 303-582-5214 co.gilpin.co.us 303-582-5214 10/2018 Life in the High Country Gilpin County is a rural Residents community in Colorado’s high country, Gilpin residents enjoy a quality of life Events neighboring the continental divide, yet enhanced by rural neighborhoods nestled Our recreation center and fairgrounds are host less than an hour west of downtown amongst scenic natural beauty, low taxes, and to many fun and educational programs for Denver. Gilpin County is host to vast a financially secure local government. The children, adults and families. Annual events, recreational opportunities offered by county’s close proximity to the Denver metro such as the Golden Gate State Park, the Arapaho and area adds relative convenience to a rural county fair, flea Roosevelt National Forests, the limited mountain life, and the variety of community market, fall and stakes gaming in the cities events and winter festivals of Black Hawk and Central, programs, the new not only add to and a recreation center, the the excitement, state-of-the-art local school systems, but are free to recreation public library and the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L
    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) Sec. 1132. Extent of System. § 1110. Liability 1133. Use of wilderness areas. 1134. State and private lands within wilderness (a) United States areas. The United States Government shall not be 1135. Gifts, bequests, and contributions. liable for any act or omission of the Commission 1136. Annual reports to Congress. or of any person employed by, or assigned or de- § 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System tailed to, the Commission. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of (b) Payment; exemption of property from attach- policy; wilderness areas; administration for ment, execution, etc. public use and enjoyment, protection, preser- Any liability of the Commission shall be met vation, and gathering and dissemination of from funds of the Commission to the extent that information; provisions for designation as it is not covered by insurance, or otherwise. wilderness areas Property belonging to the Commission shall be In order to assure that an increasing popu- exempt from attachment, execution, or other lation, accompanied by expanding settlement process for satisfaction of claims, debts, or judg- and growing mechanization, does not occupy ments. and modify all areas within the United States (c) Individual members of Commission and its possessions, leaving no lands designated No liability of the Commission shall be im- for preservation and protection in their natural puted to any member of the Commission solely condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy on the basis that he occupies the position of of the Congress to secure for the American peo- member of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Tolland Ranch Trail Boulder County Application for the Colorado The
    Tolland Ranch Trail Boulder County Application for the Colorado the Beautiful Grant Construction Projects August 1, 2019 EXHIBIT A GRANT APPLICATION CHECK LIST MANDATORY: ☐ Signed letter of resolution from Governing Body ☐ Exhibit A – Application ☐ Exhibit B – Budget (Unprotected Excel CPW form) ☐ Environmental Forms (not required for Regional Trails Planning grants) ☐ Maps/Photographs/Graphics (5 page max, pdf, letter sized pages) ☐ Letters of Support (maximum of 5). No letters from clubs or groups specifically working on the project ☐ Project can be completed within 2.5 years from receiving grant ☐ Required MATCH funding is secured, including CASH match funds ☐ CPW Area Wildlife Manager has been contacted and informed of construction projects by July 1st. Note that ALL projects will be reviewed by CPW for wildlife impacts ☐ (Construction only) Project area is owned by public land agency or has easement that designates the area to be open to public outdoor recreation for at least 25 years ☐ (Construction Only) Formal Environmental Assessment (EA) or NEPA has been completed with final approval for the project area (federal lands only). ADDITIONAL PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS: ☐ Youth Corps or youth organization will be used on the project (TBD: Likely Rocky Mountain Youth Corp. Trail location distance could prohibit Boulder County Youth Corp. We're awaiting final determination). ☐ Volunteers will be utilized on the project (TBD: Likely Volunteers for Outdoor Colorado. The organization has expressed interest in being involved. We have a letter of support, but excluded from the application per instructions). DocuSign Envelope ID: 3578063E-C94C-4DF0-8B13-9BCCFCE1687D Resolution No. 2019-69 A Resolution Supporting the Colorado the Beautiful Grant Application for Construction Projects, a partnership between the Colorado Parks and Wildlife and Great Outdoors Colorado (GOCO) for the Tolland Ranch Trail Construction Project in Boulder County and Gilpin County, Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 107–216—Aug
    PUBLIC LAW 107–216—AUG. 21, 2002 116 STAT. 1055 Public Law 107–216 107th Congress An Act To designate the James Peak Wilderness and Protection Area in the Arapaho Aug. 21, 2002 and Roosevelt National Forests in the State of Colorado, and for other purposes. [H.R. 1576] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, James Peak Wilderness and SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. Protection Act. This Act may be cited as the ‘‘James Peak Wilderness and 16 USC 539l. Protection Area Act’’. SEC. 2. WILDERNESS DESIGNATION. (a) INCLUSION WITH OTHER COLORADO WILDERNESS AREAS.— Section 2(a) of the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 (Public Law 103–77; 107 Stat. 756; 16 U.S.C. 1132 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ‘‘(21) Certain lands in the Arapaho/Roosevelt National Forest which comprise approximately 14,000 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled ‘Proposed James Peak Wilderness’, dated September 2001, and which shall be known as the James Peak Wilderness.’’. (b) ADDITION TO THE INDIAN PEAKS WILDERNESS AREA.—Section 3 of the Indian Peaks Wilderness Area and Arapaho National Recreation Area and the Oregon Islands Wilderness Area Act (Public Law 95–450; 92 Stat. 1095; 16 U.S.C. 1132 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections: ‘‘(c) The approximately 2,232 acres of Federal lands in the Arapaho/Roosevelt National Forest generally depicted on the map entitled ‘Ranch Creek Addition to Indian Peaks Wilderness’ dated September 2001, are hereby added to the Indian Peaks Wilderness Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Books, Reports, and Studies Resources, Energy, and the Environment 2004 Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation University of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/books_reports_studies Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Citation Information Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School. SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION Natural Resources Law Center University of Colorado School of Law 401 UCB Boulder, Colorado 80309-0401 2004 Table of Contents SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION ........................................................... 1 I. Overview ................................................................................................................................. 1 II. Specific Special Use Provisions............................................................................................. 1 A. Water Rights ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • "Backcountry Cache" Bpx Gear Checks
    "BACKCOUNTRY CACHE" A Newsletter for Members of CMC Backpacking Section March 2020 Issue 06-2020 KICKOFF SUCCES Within 18 hours of the 2020 Season BPX Trips Rollout 55% were "sold out" Trips over-subscribed - 23% Trips with 1 eligible sign-up spot left - 13% Trips with 2-3 eligible sign-up spots left, (trip is likely 50% or more full) - 18% Trips with more than 3 eligible sign-up spots left - 14% Statistics compiled by Uwe Sartori THANK YOU BPX LEADERS AND MEMBERS FOR ENTHUSIASTICALLY EMBRACING THESE OFFERINGS "JOIN THE PACK" TRIPS WITH REMAINING OPENINGS: May 23 - Lost Creek Wilderness 3 Day Loop - 4 Slots June 2 - Lost Creek Wilderness Goose Creek - 1 Slot 10 - Sandbeach Lake Fly Fishing & Hiking - 2 Slots 24 - Ute Trail Gunnison Gorge Wilderness - 1 Slot July 11 - Commanche Venable Lakes Sangre de Cristo Wilderness - 3 Slots 23 - Avalanche Lake MaroonBells Wilderness - 2 Slots 27 - Devils Causeway Flattops Wilderness - 1 Slot 28 - Rogers Pass Lake James Peak Wilderness - 5 Slots 29 - Nolan Lake Holy Cross Wilderness - 2 Slots August 3 - Turquoise Lake Holy Cross Wilderness - 5 Slots 5 - Upper Cataract Lake Eagles Nest Wilderness - 5 Slots 10 - Spring Creek LaGarita Wilderness - 4 Slots 12 - Half Moon Pass Collegiate Peaks Wilderness - 3 Slots 25 - Powderhorn Lakes Powderhorn Wilderness - 4 Slots 25 - McCurdy Park Lost Creek Wilderness- 6 Slots September 3 - Blue Lakes San Juan Wilderness - 4 Slots 4 - Lost Lake Rocky Mountain National Park - 2 Slots 5 - Devils Causeway Flattops Wilderness - 2 Slots 8 - Trapers Traverse Flattops Wilderness - 2 Slots 16 - Willow & Salmon Lakes Eagles Nest Wilderness - 4 Slots Coming Soon Grover Cleveland, Trails Committee Chair, is joining with BPX to offer three Conservation Mapping trips in Lost Creek Wilderness.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Open Lands and Colorado Conservation Trust Merge to Create Future of Land Conservation in Colorado
    Our Land Our Water Our Future COLORADO OPEN L ANDSCAPES A NEWSLETTER OF COLORADO OPEN LANDS On a retreat at the Trinchera Ranch, the Board and staff of COL and CCT work out the details of merging together to form a stronger organization to ensure the protection of conserved lands in perpetuity. Photo by Catherine Austin. What’s Inside President’s Letter Colorado Open Lands and Page 3 Colorado Conservation Trust Meet COL’s Expanded Board and Staff Page 6 Merge to Create Future of Land With the merger complete, get a glimpse of the new people Conservation in Colorado energizing our work! Two of the most significant forces in land protection in Colorado, Colorado Open Lands Steve Wooten and Ken and the Colorado Conservation Trust merged effective October 1 of this year. Colorado Salazar, Award Recipients Open Lands will be the name of the successor organization, which incorporates all of the Page 5 staff and functions of the two previous organizations. In spite of torrential downpours, Two years ago, charged by the COL board to assess the future of land conservation over 300 people gathered together in the face of changing social and political priorities, Colorado Open Lands initiated to celebrate our awardees and a strategic planning process. While the effort was intended to create a course for hear about the merger! OPEN LANDS Colorado Open Lands, it evolved as a strategic plan for the land conservation industry. The framework became a serious analysis of perpetuity – what it means, what it takes, and how to get there. Our First Farm to Colorado Open Lands and the Colorado Conservation Trust have enjoyed a close Table Dinner working relationship since CCT’s inception.
    [Show full text]