Minerva Connecticut Navy Brig [Hall]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Minerva Connecticut Navy Brig [Hall] Minerva Captain Giles Hall Armed Brig 3 August 1775-26 January 1776 Connecticut Navy Brig Commissioned/First Date: 3 August 1775 Out of Service/Cause: []26 December 1775/decommissioned and returned to owner Tonnage: 108, 113 Battery: Date Reported: Number/Caliber Weight Broadside Total: Broadside: Crew: (1) 2 August 1775: 1 []total (2) 1 September 1775: 42 []total (3) 1 October 1775: 62 []total (4) 1 November 1775: 64 []total (5) 1 December 1775: 50 []total (6) 1 January 1776: 3 []total Description: Officers: (1) First Lieutenant Thomas Horsey, 3 August 1775-8 September 1775; (2) First Lieutenant James Hopkins, 8 September 1775-19 December 1775;(3) Second Lieutenant James Hopkins, 3 August 1775-8 September 1775; (4) Second Lieutenant Jehiel Tinker, 8 September 1775-14 September 1775; (5) Second Lieutenant Thompson Phillips, 14 September 1775-19 December 1775; (6) Master William Plummert [ Plymert, Pluymort] , 22 August 1775-17 December 1775; (7) First Mate William Warner, 24 August 1775-26 December 1775; (8) Second Mate John Cotton, 12 August 1775-26 December 1775; (9) Pilot Richard Dickerson, 16 September 1775-25 December 1775 Cruises: (1) Rocky Hill, Connecticut to Middletown, Connecticut Comment on this or any page at our ©awiatsea.com-posted December 2020 --1-- (2) Middletown, Connecticut to New Haven, Connecticut, []7 December 1775-13 December 1775 (3) New Haven Connecticut to Rocky Hill, Connecticut, - []25 December 1775 Prizes: Actions: Comments: On 1 July the Connecticut General Assembly resolved “that two vessels of a suitable burthen be immediately fitted out and armed with a proper number of cannon, swivel guns & small arms and furnished with necessary warlike stores and well officered and manned for the defence of the sea coasts in this colony under the care and direction of his Honr the Governor and Committee of Council appointed to assist him in the recess of the General Assembly, who are hereby authorized and directed to procure, furnish and employ the same accordingly.”1 The governor and “Committee of Council” constituted the Connecticut Committee of Safety. On 2 August the Committee of Safety selected a 108-ton brig belonging to Captain William Griswold of Weathersfield as the first vessel approved by the Assembly. 2 The Governor and Council met again the following day. They determined that “a certain brig called the “Minerva ” belonging to Capt. Griswold and now lying in Connecticut River at Rocky Hill, is one proper vessel to be employed for the service aforesaid, and do therefore agree and resolve to take up and employ sd Brig in the service of this Colony as aforesaid during such term as sd Assembly or this committee shall find needful to employ her in sd service; and do hereby appoint Titus Hosmer & Ezekiel Williams Esqr and Capt. Giles Hall a committee to take up and retain said brig in the service aforesaid, to finish the contract for the hire and charter of sd brig and execute proper writings, to cause the same to be justly approved with all her furniture and tackle proper to be retained and used as an armed vessel and make a proper inventory thereof.” Hosmer, Williams and Hall were to “furnish, prepare and provide all necessary additional sails, rigging and furniture and also all proper & necessary ship stores and provisions, and furnish from the Colony stores as far as may be, the necessary cannon, swivels, small arms, pistols, shot, powder, &&c. c…” 1 Middlebrook, History of Maritime Connecticut , 1:15-16 2 Middlebrook, History of Maritime Connecticut , 1:17 Comment on this or any page at our ©awiatsea.com-posted December 2020 --2-- They were to be given further directions from time to time by the Governor and Council. The Committee of the Pay Table was directed to draw on the Treasurer for the “sums of money as they shall find necessary to enable them to accomplish the service aforesaid ; and they to render their account of their disposition and disbursement thereof to the General Assembly, or to the Governor and Committee.”3 Giles Hall was appointed as “Captain and commander” of the Minerva , at the pay rate of £7 per month. Thomas Horsey of Derby, Connecticut was selected as the Minerva ’s First Lieutenant, at £5 per month. James Hopkins was appointed as Second Lieutenant, at £4 per month. A steward and a cook were appointed and the brig was authorized a carpenter and a pilot. The complement was established at forty sailors and forty “soldiers or marines” exclusive of officers. Hall was to enlist the crew as volunteers, allowing one month’s advance pay. He was also appointed as pay master for the crew. The Governor and Council agreed to pay 4 shillings per month per ton for the charter of the Minerva , and that the colony would “risque the vessel . .,” in other words, reimburse the owner if she was lost or damaged in service. The committee fitting out the Minerva was also to seek the rest of the warrant officers and recommend them to the Governor and Council. 4 The brig was soon moved to Middletown to be fitted out, and when examined proved to be a 113 ton vessel, and thus, the flagship of the Connecticut Navy. 5 Connecticut was also fitting out a smaller vessel, the Spy . On 24 August, to further the fitting out of the two vessels, the Governor and Council ordered Deshon “be directed forthwith to put the cannon, small arms, pistols, and every warlike implement now at N. London, suitable and proper for armed vessels, into proper order and condition for immediate use, and on receiving advice from Capt Hall of the larger armed vessel fitting at Middletown, shall be at or near Saybrook ready to receive them, to send them to him there and deliver on board his Brig. But if it shall appear there is not a sufficient quantity for both vessels, that they be properly proportioned between them.”6 The Committee of Safety received a letter from Hosmer, Williams and Hall on 24 August. They nominated various officers for the Minerva , including the bearer, William Warner (as First Mate). They had been unable to find a Gunner, and “praying that the bearer (Warner) going to Providence may inlist a Gunner there, as they cannot obtain one, and also sailors &c. It is agreed that he may do so if not disagreeable to Governor Cooke to whom the Governor is desired to write 3 Middlebrook, History of Maritime Connecticut , 1:17-18 4 Middlebrook, History of Maritime Connecticut , 1:18-19 5 NDAR, “Jonathan Trumbull, Governor of Connecticut, to Nicholas Cooke, Deputy Governor of Rhode Island,” 1:1220 6 Middlebrook, History of Maritime Connecticut , 1:20 Comment on this or any page at our ©awiatsea.com-posted December 2020 --3-- by sd Warner proposing it to him &c., which was done.”7 Trumbull wrote to Cooke the same day, explaining Warner’s mission. Trumbull noted that the fitting out of armed vessels could be a common good to both colonies and noted that the Minerva measured 113 tons. He also mentioned that another vessel, of 42 tons, was being fitted out. Trumbull wanted to know Cooke’s thoughts about recruiting Rhode Island sailors for the Connecticut crews. 8 On 8 September 1775 Horsey declined his appointment, so Hopkins was promoted from Second to First Lieutenant and Jehiel Tinker was appointed to be Second Lieutenant along with other officers. The Council of Safety approved these changes on the recommendation of Minerva ’s fitting out committee and also approved the issue of supplies. 9 A number of warrant officers were appointed, including William Plummet []Plymert as Master, and William Warner as First Mate. Benjamin Cranston of Providence, Rhode Island, was warranted as the Gunner. The Council also ordered that the Minerva be “supplied with 5 bbs. of powder and ball suitable from N. London to be delivered at Saybrook, and 300 weight of lead from Weathersfield.”10 It is clear that the Minerva was nearing the end of her conversion and fitting out process. As of 13 September 1775, the expense of fitting out was £530. 11 On 14 September the officers were commissioned. Tinker had declined to serve, so Thompson Phillips was appointed Second Lieutenant. 12 Plummert was warranted as Master, with Warner as First Mate. All the other warrants were also issued. 13 Powder for the vessel was received on 19 September 1775. 14 The muster roll of the Minerva reveals much information. The first entry is for Captain Giles Hall, dated 2 August 1775. One man enlisted on 10 August, and Second Mate John Cotton came aboard on 12 August. First Lieutenant James Hopkins joined on 14 August, along with two other men. Over the next week seven men enlisted in the crew. On 22 August Master William Pluymort came aboard, and on 24 August First Mate William Warner came aboard. Twenty-seven other men had 7 Middlebrook, History of Maritime Connecticut , 1:21 8 NDAR, “Jonathan Trumbull, Governor of Connecticut, to Nicolas Cooke, Deputy Governor of Rhode Island,” 1:1220 9 NDAR, “Minutes of the Connecticut Council of Safety,” 2:48 10 Middlebrook, History of Maritime Connecticut , 1:21 11 NDAR, “Ezekiel Williams to Thomas Seymour and Oliver Ellsworth,” 2:88 12 NDAR, “Minutes of the Connecticut Council of Safety,” 2:97 13 Middlebrook, History of Maritime Connecticut , 1:21 14 NDAR, “Lieutenant James Hopkins * Receipt for Powder for the Connecticut Brigantine Minerva ,” 2:150 Comment on this or any page at our ©awiatsea.com-posted December 2020 --4-- enlisted by 31 August, for a total crew of forty-two. 15 In September 1775 twenty-one men joined the Minerva , including Second Lieutenant Thomas Phillips on 14 September and Pilot Richard Dickerson two days later.
Recommended publications
  • Hosmer Family
    GENEALOGY OF THE HOSMER FAMILY. BY JAMES B. HOSMER. HARTFORD. STEAM PRESS OF ELIHU GEER. 1861. GENEALOGY CONNECTICUT BRA.NCH. THOMAS HOSMER, son of Stephen and Dorothy Hosmer of Hawhhurst, County of Kent, England, settled in Newtown, now Cambridge, Mass., as early as 1632, and was admitted freeman in 1635. He removed to Hartford, Conn., in June, 1636. He was one of the original settlers of Hartford, and in the first record of Town proprietors of land, January 14th, 1639, there is set to him tiO acres. His first wife, Frances, died February 15th, 1675, aged 73 years. He married for his second wife Mrs. Katherine Wilton, (now spelt Wilson) widow of Lieut. David Wilton of Northamp­ ton, formerly of Windsor. The record of the minister of Windsor at that time, is as follows: May 6th, '79, Goodman Osmer of Hartford, and the widow Wilton, that had been wife to David Wilton, were to be married at Hartford. Mr. Hosmer died at Northampton and was buried there ; his tombstone has this inscrip­ tion upon it:- THOMAS HOSMER, AGED 83 YEARS. HE DYED APRIL 12. 1687. Mr. Hosmer's daughter, Clemence, married Dea. Jonathan Hunt of Northampton. Graves of the Hunt family are on each side of his. 4 FIRST GENERATION. THOMAS HOSMER, born December 1603, died April 12th, 1687. FRANCES, his wife, born 1602, died February 15th, 1675. CHILDREN. Stephen, b. 1645, d. Nov. 4th, 1693. Clemence mar. Dea. Jonathan Hunt of Northampton, Mass.; died in 1698. Hannah mar. first Josiah Willard, March 20th, 1657; second Mr. Maltby; died July 167 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The CONSTITUTIONS of CALIFORNIA and the UNITED STATES with Related Documents
    The CONSTITUTIONS of CALIFORNIA and THE UNITED STATES with Related Documents 2017–18 Edition Cover: Spring Flowers (Poppies and Lupine, Goleta Point), n.d. John Marshall Gamble Crocker Art Museum, Melza and Ted Barr Collection, 2008.102 CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 1879 As Last Amended November 8, 2016 and Related Documents 2017–18 CALIFORNIA STATE LEGISLATURE LT. GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM HON. ANTHONY RENDON President of the Senate Speaker of the Assembly HON. KEVIN DE LEÓN HON. KEVIN MULLIN President pro Tempore of the Senate Speaker pro Tempore JEAN FULLER HON. CHAD MAYES Minority Floor Leader Republican Leader DANIEL ALVAREZ E. DOTSON WILSON Secretary of the Senate Chief Clerk of the Assembly THE STATE FLAG The Bear Flag was designated California’s State Flag by legislative enactment in 1911. It is patterned after the historic flag flown at Sonoma on June 14, 1846, by a group of American settlers in revolt against Mexican rule in California. This short-lived revolution ended on July 9, 1846. The general design and details of the Bear Flag are set forth in Section 420 of the Government Code. FOREWORD The California Legislature is privileged to present this compilation of historic documents. Taken together, these compacts, treaties, and charters embody the ongoing evolution of our core principles of representative democracy. It is important to note that our state Constitution is a living document. It has been amended over 500 times since its adoption in 1879. Some recent amendments have included a change to California’s Term Limits law through the passage of Proposition 28 (2012), the California Legislature Transparency Act enacted by Proposition 54 (2016) enhances public access to the legislative process, and with the adoption of Proposition 25 (2010), the vote threshold to pass the state budget is now a majority vote.
    [Show full text]
  • NEW JERSEY and the UNITED STATES
    a HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS of NEW JERSEY and the UNITED STATES INCLUDING The Declaration of Independence, The Articles of Confederation, The U.S. Constitution and The New Jersey Constitution a A New Jersey State Bar Foundation publication The New Jersey State Bar Foundation hopes that this booklet, Historic Documents of New Jersey and the United States, will inspire teachers and students alike to delve into America’s rich history to debate the fundamentals of democracy and what these documents mean in today’s society. Other civic publications offered by the Foundation that may be of interest include Educational Guide for Trial Jurors (second edition), which outlines New Jersey’s jury system, and the Bill of Rights Bulletin, a 24-page newsletter that contains articles related to federal constitutional issues, as well as constitutional trivia and puzzles. Also available from the Foundation is Constitutionally New Jersey, a newsletter about the New Jersey Constitution. Meant to complement the Bill of Rights Bulletin, this publication contains articles and puzzles related directly to New Jersey’s Constitution. Founded in 1958, the New Jersey State Bar Foundation is the educational and philanthropic arm of the New Jersey State Bar Association. The Bar Foundation’s mission is to promote public understanding of the law through a free, comprehensive public education program. Among its activities, the Foundation conducts conflict resolution and peer mediation trainings and teasing and bullying trainings for educators and administrators, publishes materials, operates a videotape loan library and speakers bureau, and coordinates elementary, middle and high school mock trial competitions. For more information about the Foundation’s programs and publications, visit us online at www.njsbf.org or call 1-800-FREE-LAW.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Doc. 108-222
    34 Biographical Directory DELEGATES IN THE CONTINENTAL CONGRESS CONNECTICUT Dates of Attendance Andrew Adams............................ 1778 Benjamin Huntington................ 1780, Joseph Spencer ........................... 1779 Joseph P. Cooke ............... 1784–1785, 1782–1783, 1788 Jonathan Sturges........................ 1786 1787–1788 Samuel Huntington ................... 1776, James Wadsworth....................... 1784 Silas Deane ....................... 1774–1776 1778–1781, 1783 Jeremiah Wadsworth.................. 1788 Eliphalet Dyer.................. 1774–1779, William S. Johnson........... 1785–1787 William Williams .............. 1776–1777 1782–1783 Richard Law............ 1777, 1781–1782 Oliver Wolcott .................. 1776–1778, Pierpont Edwards ....................... 1788 Stephen M. Mitchell ......... 1785–1788 1780–1783 Oliver Ellsworth................ 1778–1783 Jesse Root.......................... 1778–1782 Titus Hosmer .............................. 1778 Roger Sherman ....... 1774–1781, 1784 Delegates Who Did Not Attend and Dates of Election John Canfield .............................. 1786 William Hillhouse............. 1783, 1785 Joseph Trumbull......................... 1774 Charles C. Chandler................... 1784 William Pitkin............................. 1784 Erastus Wolcott ...... 1774, 1787, 1788 John Chester..................... 1787, 1788 Jedediah Strong...... 1782, 1783, 1784 James Hillhouse ............... 1786, 1788 John Treadwell ....... 1784, 1785, 1787 DELAWARE Dates of Attendance Gunning Bedford,
    [Show full text]
  • The Harvard Classics Eboxed
    QQig BUS THE HARVARD CLASSICS The Five-Foot Shelf of Books 1 THE HARVARD CLASSICS EDITED BY CHARLES W. ELIOT, LL.D. American Historical Documents 1000-1904 "^ith Introductions and Notes Yolume 43 P. F. Collier & Son Corporation NEW YORK Copyright, ipro By p. F. Collier & Son manufactured in u. s. a. CONTENTS PAGE The Voyages to Vinland (c. iogo) 5 The Letter of Columbus to Luis de Sant Angel Announcing His Discovery (1493) 21 Amerigo Vespucci's Account of His First Voyage (1497) . 28 John Cabot's Discovery of North America (1497) 45 First Charter of Virginia (1606) 49 The Mayflower Compact (1620) 59 The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut (1639) 60 The Massachusetts Body of Liberties (1641) 66 Arbitrary Government Described and the Government of the . Massachusetts Vindicated from that Aspersion, by John Winthrop (1644) 85 The Instrument of Government (1653) 106 A Healing Question, by Sir Henry Vane (1656) 118 John Eliot's Brief Narrative (1670) 138 Declaration OF Rights (1765) 147 The Declaration of Independence (1776) 150 The Mecklenburg Declaration OF Independence (1775) . 156 Articles of Confederation (1777) 158 Articles of Capitulation, Yorktown (1781) 169 Treaty with Great Britain (1783) 174 Constitution of the United States (1787) 180 The Federalist, Nos. i and 2 (1787) . 199 Opinion of Chief Justice Marshall, in the Case of McCulloch vs. THE State OF Maryland (1819) 208 Washington's First Inaugural Address (1789) 225 Treaty with the Six Nations (1794) 229 Washington's Farewell Address (1796) 233 Treaty with France (Louisiana Purchase) (1803) 250 Treaty with Great Britain (End of War ofi8i2)(i8i4) .
    [Show full text]
  • A File in the Online Version of the Kouroo Contexture (Approximately
    THE FAMILIES OF CONCORD: HOSMER HOSMER.1 Two of this name, Thomas and James, supposed to be brothers, from Hockhurst, County of Kent, came to America. Thomas was of Cambridge, 1632, and probably removed to Connecticut, and was ancestor of Reverend Stephen, Harvard College 1699, the Honorable Titus, and Honorable Stephen Titus Hosmer, all distinguished men in that state. James came to Concord among the first settlers; died February 7, 1685; his first wife died 1641 and second wife, Ellen, 1665. They had James, John (a petitioner for Chelmsford, who died, according to tradition, in Ireland), Hannah, married Joseph Hayward, Mary, married Thomas Smith, and Stephen, born 1642. James, the eldest son, married Sarah White 1658, and was killed at Sudbury fight; his widow married Samuel Rice. He had James of Woodstock, Mary, married Samuel Wight, Dorothy, Hannah, married Colonel How of Marlborough, and Thomas, who married Hannah Hartwell 1696, and was father to Hannah, Sarah, Thomas, Mary, and James, of whom Thomas, the third child, married Prudence Hosmer 1731, and had Lucy, Honorable Joseph, Perses, Dinah, Lydia, and Benjamin, whose united ages were 465, or 78 each, nearly. James, the brother of Thomas last mentioned, married Elizabeth Davis of Bedford, and had Samuel, James, Elizabeth, Bulah, Ruth, and Elijah. Stephen, youngest child of the first James, married Abigail Wood 1667, and had Mary, Abigail, married George Wheeler, John, Bridget, Dorothy, Stephen, and James. Of whom Stephen married Prudence Billings 1707, and had children, Prudence, married Thomas Hosmer, above mentioned; Captain Stephen, the distinguished surveyor; Jonathan, grandfather to Simon, Esquire of Acton; Josiah, father to John and Jesse, Abel and Josiah of Templeton; Jane, and Ephraim of Acton, father to Samuel.
    [Show full text]
  • See Hosmer of CT
    Copyright by CLP Research Partial Genealogy of the Hosmers Stephen Hosmer Main Political Affiliation: (of Connecticut & New York) (1570-1633) 1763-83 Whig/Revolutionary Katherine Iddenden = = Dorothy Selden (1578-1606) (1580-1640) 1789-1823 Federalist 1824-33 National Republican 1834-53 Whig 1854- Republican Thomas Hosmer or Horsmer 2 Sons James Hosmer I 4 Children 1600 (1603-87) (1605-65) (Emigrated from Hawkhurst, Kent, England to Massachusetts, 1632) = Mary Willard (helped found Hartford, Connecticut, 1636) (1608-41) = Frances Maynard Bushnell (1602-75) Hannah Hosmer 4 Others Stephen Hosmer Hester Hosmer Clemence Hosmer (Hunt) James Hosmer II 3 Others (1639-74) (1645-93) (1647-1702) (1648-95) (1637-76) = Sarah White = Josiah Willard = Hannah = Rev. Thomas Buckingham II = John Smith (1643-1711) (1636-74); (schoolmaster) Bushnell (1646-1709) (1647-1704) 1650See Willard of VA (1645-93) See Buckingham of CT (of Milford, New Haven CT) Genealogy Genealogy See Smith of CT James Hosmer III 4 Others Sarah Hosmer Genealogy (1660-1728) (1662-1724) 10 Others Cpt. Thomas Hosmer Part II (1675-1732) See Sawyer of NH = Elizabeth Sawyer = Thomas Howe I = Ann Prentice Genealogy (1663-1745) (1656-1733) (1674-1753) Part I See Howe of WI Genealogy Zerivah Hosmer 8 Others (1695-at least 1737) 1700 6 Others Rev. Stephen Hosmer = Hezekiah Sabin (1704-58) (1692-1762) = Deliverance Graves (1713-61) See Sabin of MN Genealogy 11 Others Titus Hosmer Dr. Timothy Hosmer (1736-80) (1740-1820) (CT house, 1773-78; speaker, 1776, 1778); (CT council of safety, 1776-77); (CT senate, 1778-80) (moved to New York) (US Continental Congress, 1778-80; Signer Articles of Confederation); (US Maritime Court Judge, 1780) (Ontario co.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew Adams (1736–1797) Married Eunice Buel, and They Would Have One Child, a Son, Also Named Andrew Adams
    A Andrew Adams (1736–1797) married Eunice Buel, and they would have one child, a son, also named Andrew Adams. Adams served in numerous elected and appointed positions in Connecticut. He also served as a member of the Connecticut Council of Safety for two years. When the war against Britain broke out in 1775, he volunteered for service in the Connecticut militia, seeing action and rising to the rank of Colonel. He then returned to Connecticut, where he was elected to the state House of Representatives, serving from 1776 to 1781, and serving as the Speaker of that body in 1779 and 1780. More importantly, Adams served as a delegate to the Continental Congress in 1778. And while he did not sign the Declaration of Independence, he was a signatory to the Articles of Confederation in 1778. In his history of the men and correspondence of those delegates who served in the Continental Congress, historian Edmund Cody Burnett explains that Andrew Adams served as a delegate to the Adams was elected on 11 October 1777 but Continental Congress from Connecticut (1778), “did not attend in 1777.” [3] According to the was a signer of the Articles of Confederation “Biographical Directory of the United States (1778), and, just prior to his death, served as Congress, 1774-2005,” Adams is listed as a a member of the Connecticut Supreme Court member of the Continental Congress, having (1789-97), rising to serve as chief justice of that served, according to the directory, in 1778, body (1793-97) [1]. the same year that he signed the Articles of Born in Stratford, Connecticut, on 7 January 1736, Confederation, the first official governmental Adams was, according to the small biography of blueprint of the new American nation that him put together in an 1856 work, “[b]eing of came into existence in 1783.
    [Show full text]
  • Charters of Freedom History/Social Studies Contents
    Charters of Freedom History/Social Studies Contents 1 Wikijunior:United States Charters of Freedom 1 1.1 Important Documents ........................................... 1 1.2 Other Concepts .............................................. 2 2 Declaration of Independence 4 2.1 Background ................................................ 4 2.2 Draft and adoption ............................................. 4 2.3 Distribution and copies .......................................... 5 2.4 Text and analysis .............................................. 6 2.4.1 Introduction ............................................ 6 2.4.2 Preamble ............................................. 6 2.4.3 Indictment ............................................. 7 2.4.4 Denunciation ........................................... 8 2.4.5 Conclusion ............................................ 8 2.5 Text on the back of the document ..................................... 9 2.6 Differences between draft and final versions ................................ 9 2.7 Myths ................................................... 10 2.8 Questions ................................................. 10 2.9 Source ................................................... 11 3 Constitution 19 3.1 Background ................................................ 19 3.2 Text of the Constitution .......................................... 19 3.2.1 Preamble ............................................. 20 3.2.2 Article I .............................................. 21 3.2.3 Article II ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seedtime of an American Judiciary: from Independence to the Constitution
    William & Mary Law Review Volume 17 (1975-1976) Issue 3 Bicentennial Symposium: Constitutional Article 5 Government - Strengths, Weaknesses, Future March 1976 Seedtime of an American Judiciary: From Independence to the Constitution William F. Swindler William & Mary Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr Part of the President/Executive Department Commons Repository Citation William F. Swindler, Seedtime of an American Judiciary: From Independence to the Constitution, 17 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 503 (1976), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol17/iss3/5 Copyright c 1976 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr SEEDTIME OF AN AMERICAN JUDICIARY: FROM INDEPENDENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION WmLAm F. SWInDLER* THE CLOSiNG OF THE ROYAL COu-RTS In the increasing disputes between the colonies and the mother coun- try preceding the war for independence, the nature of law and of the courts in British North America periodically came into question. Colonial leaders pointed retrospectively to the assumption, embodied in the earliest colonial charters, that the common law, modified to apply to the local needs of each settlement or "plantation," was the root stock of American jurisprudence.1 Once the issue of the authority of the common law in the colonies was belatedly raised, English authorities countered with the declaration that neither the common law nor the English Constitu- tion followed the flag except as England decreed.2 Essentiallv, this was the impasse on which the hope of avoiding revolution ultimately perished. Although their authority to do so might be called into question, the colonies proceeded to adopt or adapt the common law, setting up sys- tems of courts resembling the judicial structure remembered from Eng- * John Marshall Professor of Law, College of William and Mary.
    [Show full text]
  • High School | 9Th–12Th Grade
    High School | 9th–12th Grade American History 1776The Hillsdale Curriculum The Hillsdale 1776 Curriculum 9th–12th Grade HIGH SCHOOL American History 2 units | 45–50-minute classes OVERVIEW Unit 1 | The American Founding 15–19 classes LESSON 1 1763–1776 Self–Government or Tyranny LESSON 2 1776 The Declaration of Independence LESSON 3 1776–1783 The War of Independence LESSON 4 1783–1789 The United States Constitution Unit 2 | The American Civil War 14–18 classes LESSON 1 1848–1854 The Expansion of Slavery LESSON 2 1854–1861 Toward Civil War LESSON 3 1861–1865 The Civil War LESSON 4 1865–1877 Reconstruction 1 Copyright © 2021 Hillsdale College. All Rights Reserved. The Hillsdale 1776 Curriculum American History High School UNIT 1 The American Founding 1763–1789 45–50-minute classes | 15–19 classes UNIT PREVIEW Structure LESSON 1 1763–1776 Self-Government or Tyranny 4–5 classes p. 7 LESSON 2 1776 The Declaration of Independence 2–3 classes p. 14 LESSON 3 1776–1783 The War of Independence 3–4 classes p. 23 LESSON 4 1783–1789 The United States Constitution 4–5 classes p. 29 APPENDIX A Study Guide, Test, and Writing Assignment p. 41 APPENDIX B Primary Sources p. 59 Why Teach the American Founding The beginning is the most important part of any endeavor, for a small change at the beginning will result in a very different end. How much truer this is of the most expansive of human endeavors: founding and sustaining a free country. The United States of America has achieved the greatest degree of freedom and prosperity for the greatest proportion of any country’s population in the history of humankind.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Founding Fathers -- Who Are They? Thumbnail Sketches of 164 Patriots
    AMERICA’S FOUNDING FATHERS Who are they? Thumbnail sketches of 164 patriots JACK STANFIELD Universal Publishers USA • 2001 America's Founding Fathers -- Who are they? Thumbnail sketches of 164 patriots Copyright © 2001 Jack R. Stanfield All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except in case of review, without the prior written permission of the author. Author’s Note: The information is accurate to the extent the author could confirm it from readily available sources. Neither the author nor the publisher can assume any responsibility for any action taken based on information contained in this book. Universal Publishers/uPUBLISH.com USA • 2001 ISBN: 1-58112-668-9 www.uPUBLISH.com/books/stanfield.htm To my wife Barbara who inspired this book, and without whose patience and encouragement, it would not have been completed. Content INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1 SETTING THE STAGE 10 SKETCHES OF THE FOUNDING FATHERS 23 CHAPTER 2 FOUNDING FATHERS FROM CONNECTICUT 24 Andrew Adams, Oliver Ellsworth, Titus Hosmer, Samuel Huntington, William Samuel Johnson, Roger Sherman, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott CHAPTER 3 FOUNDING FATHERS FROM DELAWARE 32 Richard Bassett, Gunning Bedford, Jacob Broom, John Dickinson, Thomas McKean, George Read, Caesar Rodney, Nicolas Van Dyke CHAPTER 4 FOUNDING FATHERS FROM GEORGIA 39 Abraham Baldwin, William Few, Button Gwinnett, Layman Hall,William Houstoun,
    [Show full text]