Making a Difference Beyond Numbers
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
05 June 2013 EALA
05 June 2013 EALA Wednesday, 05 June 2013 The Assembly met at 2.30 p.m. in Parliament House, Kampala, Uganda The National Anthem The East African Community Anthem PRAYERS (The Speaker, Ms Margret Nantongo Zziiwa, in the Chair.) The Assembly was called to order. PROCLAMATION The Speaker: Hon. Members, amidst us today is H.E, Yoweri Kaguta Museveni, the President of the Republic of Uganda. (Applause) I have, in accordance with the provisions of Article 54 of the Treaty, invited him to address this Assembly. I now would like to make the following proclamation to welcome his presence to the Presence; “WHEREAS Clause 1 of Article 54 of the Treaty provides that the Speaker of the Assembly can invite any person to attend the Assembly, notwithstanding that he/she is not a Member of the Assembly, if in his/her opinion, the business of the Assembly renders his/her presence desirable; AND WHEREAS, in the opinion of the Speaker, the attendance and presence in the Assembly of the President of the Republic of Uganda and the Chairperson of the Summit of the EAC Heads of State is desirable in accordance with the business now before us as the Assembly; NOW THEREFORE, it is with great pleasure and honour, on your behalf, honourable members, to welcome H. E, Yoweri Kaguta Museveni in this Assembly. ADDRESS BY H. E YOWERI KAGUTA MUSEVENI, THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA WELCOME REMARKS BY THE SPEAKER OF EALA The Speaker: Your Excellence, Yoweri Kaguta Museveni, the President of the Republic of Uganda and Chairperson of the Summit of the EAC Heads of State, Rt Hon. -
Uganda Date: 30 October 2008
Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: UGA33919 Country: Uganda Date: 30 October 2008 Keywords: Uganda – Uganda People’s Defence Force – Intelligence agencies – Chieftaincy Military Intelligence (CMI) – Politicians This response was prepared by the Research & Information Services Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. This research response may not, under any circumstance, be cited in a decision or any other document. Anyone wishing to use this information may only cite the primary source material contained herein. Questions 1. Please provide information on the Uganda Peoples Defence Force (Ugandan Army)/Intelligence Agencies and a branch of the Army called Chieftaincy Military Intelligence, especially its history, structure, key officers. Please provide any information on the following people: 2. Noble Mayombo (Director of Intelligence). 3. Leo Kyanda (Deputy Director of CMI). 4. General Mugisha Muntu. 5. Jack Sabit. 6. Ben Wacha. 7. Dr Okungu (People’s Redemption Army). 8. Mr Samson Monday. 9. Mr Kyakabale. 10. Deleted. RESPONSE 1. Please provide information on the Uganda Peoples Defence Force (Ugandan Army)/Intelligence Agencies and a branch of the Army called Chieftaincy Military Intelligence, especially its history, structure, key officers. The Uganda Peoples Defence Force UPDF is headed by General Y Museveni and the Commander of the Defence Force is General Aronda Nyakairima; the Deputy Chief of the Defence Forces is Lt General Ivan Koreta and the Joint Chief of staff Brigadier Robert Rusoke. -
Rule by Law: Discriminatory Legislation and Legitimized Abuses in Uganda
RULE BY LAW DIscRImInAtORy legIslAtIOn AnD legItImIzeD Abuses In ugAnDA Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 3 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. First published in 2014 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW United Kingdom © Amnesty International 2014 Index: AFR 59/06/2014 Original language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom All rights reserved. This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. The copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. For copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. To request permission, or for any other inquiries, please contact [email protected] Cover photo: Ugandan activists demonstrate in Kampala on 26 February 2014 against the Anti-Pornography Act. © Isaac Kasamani amnesty.org CONTENTS 1. Introduction -
Uganda Joint Statement
JOINT STATEMENT ON THE OCCASION OF THE VISIT TO UGANDA OF THE VICE PRESIDENT OF INDIA, Mr MOHAMMAD HAMID ANSARI FROM 21 – 23 FEBRUARY 2017 The Vice President of India, Mr Mohammad Hamid Ansari paid an official visit to Uganda from 21st to 23rd February 2017. The Vice President was accompanied by his spouse Mrs Salma Ansari and a delegation comprising Minister of State, Mr Vijay Sampla, four Members of Parliament, other Senior Government Officials and a business delegation. 2. Vice President Ansari met and held bilateral discussions with President of the Republic of Uganda Mr Yoweri Museveni, at State House, Entebbe on Wednesday 22nd February 2017. Vice President Ansari also met the Vice President of Uganda Mr Edward Ssekandi, Speaker of Uganda Ms Rebecca Alitwala Kadaga and Prime Minister Mr Ruhakana Rugunda. The Vice President addressed a business event jointly organised by the Private Sector Foundation of Uganda and Federation of India Chambers of Commerce and Industry. VP Ansari visited the Source of the Nile in Jinja and paid floral tribute at the bust of Mahatma Gandhi. VP also interacted with the Indian Community in Uganda. 3. During the discussions, Vice President Ansari and President Museveni acknowledged the long-standing excellent historical relations that exist between Uganda and India. Both sides acknowledged the huge potential in India-Uganda bilateral relations and re-affirmed the mutual desire to strengthen economic, diplomatic, military, technical, educational, scientific and cultural cooperation between India and Uganda. In this regard, it was acknowledged that there were an estimated over 26000 persons of Indian origin in Uganda who contribute immensely towards Uganda’s national economy. -
Decentralisation and Conflict in Uganda
Elliott D. Green Decentralisation and conflict in Uganda Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Green, Elliott D. (2008) Decentralisation and conflict in Uganda. Conflict, Security and Development, 8 (4). pp. 427-450. ISSN 1478-1174 DOI: 10.1080/14678800802539317 © 2008 Taylor & Francis This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21927/ Available in LSE Research Online: June 2010 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final manuscript accepted version of the journal article, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer review process. Some differences between this version and the published version may remain. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Decentralization and Conflict in Uganda Elliott D. Green1 Development Studies Institute London School of Economics [email protected] Forthcoming in Conflict, Security and Development 8, 4 (December, 2008) Abstract: Political economists have long debated the relationship between decentralization and conflict. There has been little discussion, however, about two key aspects of decentralization: first, to which levels of local government power should be decentralized, and second, on what basis new decentralized districts should be created. -
2014 Dec. Vol. 7 No. 2
AFRICA PEACE AND Geoffrey Thomas Harris, Durban University of Technology CONFLICT JOURNAL Monica Kathina Juma, Kenyan Ministry of Defense Tony Karbo, University for Peace Executive Editor Marion Keim Lees, University of Western Cape Jean-Bosco Butera, Director, UPEACE Africa Gilbert Khadiagala, University of the Witwatersrand Programme Mary E. King, University for Peace Managing Editor Terrence Lyons, George Mason University Samuel Kale Ewusi, Research Coordinator, Pamela Machakanja, Africa University UPEACE Africa Programme Guy Martin, Winston-Salem State University Guest Editor Erin McCandless, Journal of Peacebuilding and Dr. Samuel Bwalya, UNDP Country Director, Development Ethiopia Christopher Mitchell, George Mason University Tim Murithi, Institute for Transitional Justice and Assistant Managing Editor Reconciliation, Cape Town Agnes Asele Susan Allen Nan, George Mason University EDITORIAL BOARD Edith Natukunda, Makerere University Amr Abdalla, Salam Institute for Peace and Justice, Sulayman Nyang, Howard University Washington, D.C. Jan Pronk, Institute for Social Studies, Hizkias Assefa, Eastern Mennonite University The Netherlands Elham Atashi, Goucher College Martin Rupiya, Africa Public Policy and Johannes Botes, University of Baltimore Research Institute Benjamin Broome, Arizona State University Mary Hope Schoewbel, United States Institute Kevin Clements, University of Otago of Peace Alyson Frendak, George Mason University Craig Zelizer, Georgetown University ISSN 1659–3944 Copyright © 2014 University for Peace University for -
Adminstrative Law and Governance Project Kenya, Malawi and Uganda
LOCAL GOVERNANCE IN UGANDA By Rose Nakayi ADMINSTRATIVE LAW AND GOVERNANCE PROJECT KENYA, MALAWI AND UGANDA The researcher acknowledges the research assistance offered by James Nkuubi and Brian Kibirango 1 Contents I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 3 II. LOCAL GOVERNANCE IN THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT............................................................. 6 A. Local Governance in the Pre-Independence Period ........................................................................... 6 B. Rule Making, Public Participation and Accountability in Pre independence Uganda ....................... 10 C. The Post-Independence Period........................................................................................................ 11 D. Post 1986 Period ............................................................................................................................ 12 III. LOCAL GOVERNANCE IN THE POST 1995 CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL REGIME ...... 12 A. Local Governance Under the 1995 Constitution and the Local Governments Act ................................ 12 B. Kampala Capital City: A Unique Position........................................................................................... 14 C. Public Participation in Rule Making in Local Governments and KCCA .............................................. 19 IV. ADJUDICATION OF DISPUTES AND IMPACT OF JUDICIAL REVIEW ................................. 24 D. Adjudication -
Janmyr Civil Militias in Uganda NJHR Aug 2014.Pdf (150.8Kb)
Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 2014 Vol. 32, No. 3, 199–219, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2014.937203 Recruiting Internally Displaced Persons into Civil Militias: The Case of Northern Uganda Maja Janmyr* Researcher, Faculty of Law, University of Bergen, Norway This article explores the state-sanctioned recruitment of internally displaced persons (IDPs) into civil militias in northern Uganda between 1996 and 2006. Drawing upon international and Ugandan domestic law, as well as empirical research in Uganda, it provides an illustrative case study of the circumstances in which IDPs were mobilised into an array of civil militias. By applying a framework elaborated by the UN Commission on Human Rights, it discusses, and subsequently determines, the lawfulness of this mobilisation. When doing so, the article highlights how, in Uganda, civil militias were dealt with completely outside of domestic law, despite repeated calls from Ugandan MPs to establish their lawfulness. It finds that government authorities long denied any liability for the conduct of the militias, and argues that the uncertain position of the civil militias created plenty of room for unmonitored conduct and substantial human rights abuse. Keywords: Military recruitment; forced recruitment; civil militia; civil defence forces; auxiliary forces; internally displaced persons; Uganda 1. Introduction Military recruitment in the context of displacement has taken place on almost every continent and constitutes one of the most problematic security issues within refugee and internally displaced persons (IDP) camps.1 Refugees and IDPs have long been recruited by both state and non-state actors, forced or otherwise. At the same time, from the perspective of international law, one form of recruitment – recruitment into civil militias – is particularly understudied. -
An Analysis of Uganda's Truth Commission
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by YorkSpace The Politics of Acknowledgement: An Analysis of Uganda’s Truth Commission Joanna R. Quinn1 Doctoral Candidate Department of Political Science McMaster University YCISS Working Paper Number 19 March 2003 The YCISS Working Paper Series is designed to stimulate feedback from other experts in the field. The series explores topical themes that reflect work being undertaken at the Centre. 1 I wish to thank Dr. Rhoda Howard-Hassmann of McMaster University for our on-going dialogue on this subject. I also gratefully acknowledge the support of Dr. William Coleman and the Institute on Globalization and the Human Condition of McMaster University, and of the International Development Research Centre in Ottawa, Canada. In the aftermath of a period of gross atrocity at the hands of the state, the restoration of the political and social fabric of a country is a pressing need. In the case of Uganda from the mid-1960s forward, this need was particularly real. Almost since the country had gained independence from Britain in 1962, a series of brutal governmental regimes had ransacked the country, and had viciously dealt with its inhabitants. Nearly thirty years of mind-numbing violence, perpetrated under the regimes of Idi Amin and Milton Obote, culminated in a broken society. Where once had stood a capable people, able to provide for themselves on every level, now was found a country whose economic, political, and social systems were seriously fractured. Under both Obote and Amin, as well as the transitional governments in place between and immediately following these regimes, democracy and the rule of law had been suspended. -
Museveni, Mbabazi, Barya Nominated
2 NEW VISION, Wednesday, November 4, 2015 ELECTION 2016 Mbabazi shaking hands with Kiggundu during nomination Baryamureeba hands documents to Kiggundu at Namboole Museveni, Mbabazi, Barya nominated By Moses Walubiri Baryamureeba nominated and Pascal Kwesiga At 10:55am, 17 minutes after making his entrance, Baryamureeba too got The faces of candidates to appear nominated. on the ballot paper for next year’s The academic-turned-politician presidential elections became clearer said he intends to revamp Uganda’s yesterday, following the nomination health and education sectors an of President Yoweri Museveni and integral component of his campaign. former premier, Amama Mbabazi. “You cannot think of development The other candidate nominated when you have an ailing health by the Electoral Commission (EC) sector, and broken education sector,” was former Makerere University Baryamureeba noted, saying Mbabazi vice-chancellor, Prof. Venansius and Museveni are the same. Baryamureeba. “If Mbabazi and Museveni were Although the EC expected five of bishops, they would be retired clerics the 10 candidates that had satisfied now. I am just 46 years. This country the requirement of collecting needs someone of my energy and signatures of not less than 100 calibre,” he added. voters in at least two thirds of all the Mbabazi and Baryamureeba districts in Uganda, only four turned picked the signs of a chair and a up. clock respectively which they will “By the powers entrusted in me use during their campaigns since by the Electoral Commissions Act, they are contesting as independent I declare Yoweri Kaguta Museveni candidates. a duly nominated candidate,” EC However, Charles Bbale Lwanga of chairman, Dr. -
REALITY CHECK Multiparty Politics in Uganda Assoc
REALITY CHECK Multiparty Politics in Uganda Assoc. Prof. Yasin Olum (PhD) The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung but rather those of the author. MULTIPARTY POLITICS IN UGANDA i REALITY CHECK Multiparty Politics in Uganda Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung 51A, Prince Charles Drive, Kololo P. O. Box 647, Kampala Tel. +256 414 25 46 11 www.kas.de ISBN: 978 - 9970 - 153 - 09 - 1 Author Assoc. Prof. Yasin Olum (PhD) © Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be produced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without prior written permission of Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung ii MULTIPARTY POLITICS IN UGANDA Table of Contents Foreword ..................................................................................................... 1 List of Tables ................................................................................................. 3 Acronyms/Abbreviations ................................................................................. 4 Introduction .................................................................................................. 7 PART 1: THE MULTIPARTY ENVIRONMENT: HISTORICAL BACKGROUND, LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND INSTITUTIONS ........................... 11 Chapter One: ‘Democratic’ Transition in Africa and the Case of Uganda ........................... 12 Introduction ................................................................................................... 12 Defining Democracy -
Democracy Or Fallacy: Discourses Shaping Multi-Party Politics and Development in Uganda
Journal of African Democracy and Development Vol. 1, Issue 2, 2017, 109-127, www.kas.de/Uganda/en/ Democracy or Fallacy: Discourses Shaping Multi-Party Politics and Development in Uganda Jacqueline Adongo Masengoa Abstract This paper examines the discourses shaping the introduction of multi-party politics in Uganda and how it is linked to democracy and development. The paper shows that most Ugandans prefer multi-party politics because they link it to democracy and development. This is why when the National Resistance Army/Movement (NRA/M) captured power in 1986 and multi-party politics was abolished, there was pressure from the public to reinstate it through the 2005 referendum in which the people voted in favour of a multi- party system. The paper also examines the role played by Ugandan politicians and professional middle class such as writers and literary critics (local agency) in the return of multi-party politics in Uganda. It explores their contribution of in re-democratising the Ugandan state and argues that despite the common belief that multi-party politics aids democracy and development, it might not be the case in Uganda. Multi-party politics in Uganda has turned out not to necessarily mean democracy, and eventually development. The paper grapples with the question of what democracy is in Uganda and/ or to Ugandans, and the extent to which the Ugandan political arena can be considered democratic, and as a fertile ground for development. Did the return to multi- party politics in Uganda guarantee democracy or is it just a fallacy? What is the relationship between democracy and development in Uganda? Keywords: Multi-party politics, democracy, Fallacy, Uganda 1.