DOCSLIB.ORG

Best Practices for Developing Ecotourism in Support of National Parks in Slovakia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Best Practices for Developing Ecotourism in Support of National Parks in Slovakia BEST PRACTICES FOR DEVELOPING ECOTOURISM IN SUPPORT OF NATIONAL PARKS IN SLOVAKIA On behalf of Aevis n.o., Rybnická 3951, 06901 Snina, Slovakia LT&C is a Non-Profit Organisation registered in Norway Kystveien 2 N-4841 Arendal (Reg.No 813 329 972) 0 BEST PRACTICES FOR DEVELOPING ECOTOURISM IN SUPPORT OF NATIONAL PARKS IN SLOVAKIA Contents BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OF THIS HANDBOOK 3 CURRENT TOURISM TRENDS OF RELEVANCE FOR PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT 4 METHODOLOGY 9 ECOTOURISM BEST PRACTICES SUPPORTING NATIONAL PARKS 10 CHAPTER 1: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT FOR PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT 11 CHAPTER 2: FINANCIAL MECHANISMS TO SUPPORT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 18 CHAPTER 3: TOOLS FOR ECOTOURISM PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT 24 CHAPTER 4: CERTIFICATION IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERNATIONAL STANDARDISATION ON REGIONAL AND DESTINATION LEVEL 30 CHAPTER 5: VISITOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY NATIONAL PARK AND NGOS AND COOPERATION SCHEMES WITH TOURIST GUIDES 36 BIBLIOGRAPHY 43 ANNEX 48 Stakeholder Map 48 Interview Participants 49 This Handbook is realized within the project Fewer barriers for more benefits in utilising nature and is supported by a program ACF – Slovakia, which is financed from the EEA Financial Mechanism 2014-2021. An administrator of the program is Ekopolis Foundation in partnership with Open Society Foundation Bratislava and Carpathian Foundation. 1 BEST PRACTICES FOR DEVELOPING ECOTOURISM IN SUPPORT OF NATIONAL PARKS IN SLOVAKIA Executive Summary This practical handbook was put together target area in a national park. It was by Linking Tourism & Conservation (LT&C) highlighted that a people centered outlook, on behalf of Aevis n.o. as part of the project where ecotourism is seen as an integral “fewer barriers for more benefits in utilizing part of rural development is crucial. nature” funded by EEA Norway grants Inventories, baseline assessments and under the Active Citizens Fund – Slovakia market segmentation form the basis of grant programme, to support the project product development, together with component on “data & research”. The careful planning, consideration of handbook aims to provide stakeholders sustainability, health and safety standards from Slovakia, specifically from the and constant monitoring. It was found that Poloniny national park, with arguments tourism and conservation can work hand in from different international LT&C examples hand, but often it requires thinking outside and the wider LT&C network on how of the box and finding ways that provide ecotourism can directly benefit benefits for all parties. conservation in protected areas. Interviews The handbook aimed at collecting relevant were conducted with key conservation and practices, policies and guidelines in the tourism professionals in the areas of: available scope, to set the base for further ● Stakeholder engagement for cooperation between LT&C, Aevis n.o. and protected area management, its partners. ● Financial mechanisms to support environmental protection, ● Tools for ecotourism product development and ● Visitor services and cooperation schemes. Main findings include the need to create a joint participatory approach to sustainable ecotourism development within the protected area and the wider destination. Tourism being a possible tool for protected area financing, management and income generation for local communities, supporting already existing local economies and environments through a diversified ecotourism offer. A staged approach to ecotourism development, as part of a multi-land use approach, was described, which is based on a selected 2 BEST PRACTICES FOR DEVELOPING ECOTOURISM IN SUPPORT OF NATIONAL PARKS IN SLOVAKIA BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Example” in detail, with the aim to share knowledge that makes replication at OF THIS HANDBOOK (an)other protected area(s) possible. As part of the project “fewer barriers for Thereby the importance lies on showcasing more benefits in utilizing nature” funded by examples that provide either financial or EEA Norway grants under the Active political support to a protected area or Citizens Fund – Slovakia grant programme, facilitate educational activities. Linking Tourism and Conservation (LT&C) has been commissioned by the Aevis n.o. to As part of the cooperation and in order to support the project component on “data & provide an understanding of the research” by developing a practical destination and the challenges faced by the handbook which provides stakeholders Aevis n.o. and their partners, a 5-day study from Slovakia with arguments and tour to Slovakia was organised for LT&C in international best practice examples from September 2019, visiting the Poloniny the LT&C network on how tourism can National Park, Slovak Paradise National directly benefit conservation in protected Park, Tatra National Park and Poľana areas. protected landscape area and respective stakeholders from public and private Aim of handbook: sector. Based on the guided visits, interviews, discussions and participation in ● Present best practice examples of the inception workshop in Zvolen, jointly ecotourism and conservation in key with the local stakeholders, LT&C members areas of concern that are relevant to were able to identify the main key areas of Slovakia concern for ecotourism development in the ● Provide practical testimonies and protected areas, which needed to be experience addressed in this handbook. ● Highlight approaches, tools and recommendations for Slovakia. The best practices of this handbook were selected based on the experience of LT&C LT&C is a global network of members from in Slovakia. Relevant LT&C members, the fields of both tourism and conservation, partners and other contacts were working towards a global complete subsequently contacted, to present network of protected areas, for which the examples that are of relevance for Slovak organisation profiles so called “LT&C- partners. Each of the following chapters Examples”, where tourism is leading and the highlighted case studies aim to be conservation. For this, LT&C searches and as relevant as possible for Slovak partners. promotes initiatives, projects or businesses However, the feasibility can only be judged globally, that represent an outstanding by Slovak partners themselves, as LT&C has example of tourism supporting the only a limited understanding of all the establishment, management or the further problems and opportunities in the Slovak development of (a) protected area(s). The areas of concern. members or partners of LT&C are encouraged to describe such an “LT&C- 3 BEST PRACTICES FOR DEVELOPING ECOTOURISM IN SUPPORT OF NATIONAL PARKS IN SLOVAKIA CURRENT TOURISM TRENDS the atmosphere since three million years, with increasingly severe impacts of climate OF RELEVANCE FOR change, including rising temperatures, PROTECTED AREA more extreme weather, water stress, sea MANAGEMENT level rise and disruption to marine and land ecosystems. Nature-based travel International tourist arrivals have reached 1,4 billion in 2019, the number of The tourism industry has been estimated to international air passengers is 130% higher account for about 10% of the gross than in 2004 (WTM, 2019). Transport domestic product (GDP) worldwide (WTTC, accounting for 75% of emissions related to 2019). And within the sector nature-based tourism. With its close connection to the tourism, including wildlife watching and environment and climate itself, tourism is a outdoor recreation, often in protected highly climate-sensitive sector (Cabrini, areas, has been gaining the most popularity 2019). In the climate change debate, amongst travellers all over the world since tourism is victim and offender at the same the 1990s (Balmford, Beresford, Green, et time. Destinations around the world are al. 2009). Whereas in more recent years it gathering data on the implications of has picked up momentum due to climate change for their business (New increasing rediscovered public awareness Zealand recognizing the threat of of our natural surroundings and our role environmental impact of travel on its within global ecosystems. industry (1 News, 2019)), experiencing first- These statistics underline widespread hand the increasing negative effects that recognition that nature-based tourism is natural disasters can have on destinations indeed capable of generating substantial (flooding in Venice, bush fires in Western resources for both conservation and local Australia). economic development (Chen & Prebensen, 2017; Gössling, 1999; Boo, With the science and noticeable growing 1990). It is predicted that nature-based impacts of climate change comes an tourism is going to continue growing in its increasing global awareness of climate many forms (Balmford, Beresford, Green, et change and through activists such as Greta al. 2009). Some of these are thought of Thunberg, the perception and needs of being especially relevant not just in the travellers has shifted towards climate coming years, but for this handbook friendly holidays. Ecotourism is naturally a (UNWTO, 2019). part of tourism that is in line with this mindset. Especially remote natural areas Climate aware travel and wildlife experiences are attracting travellers that have become aware of the According to the World Meteorological fragile ecosystems affected by climate Organisation (2019), 2019 recorded the change, or those who would like to escape highest concentration of carbon dioxide in modern routines to reconnect with nature 4 BEST PRACTICES FOR DEVELOPING ECOTOURISM IN SUPPORT OF NATIONAL PARKS IN SLOVAKIA (Joyner, Lackey, & Bricker, 2018; Weaver, 2008).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reviewing the Coherence and Effectiveness of Implementation of Multilateral Biodiversity Agreements in Estonia
    Stockholm Environment Institute Tallinn Centre, Publication No 25, Project Report – 2014 Reviewing the coherence and effectiveness of implementation of multilateral biodiversity agreements in Estonia Kaja Peterson, Piret Kuldna, Plamen Peev, Meelis Uustal Reviewing the coherence and effectiveness of implementation of multilateral biodiversity agreements in Estonia Kaja Peterson, Piret Kuldna, Plamen Peev, Meelis Uustal Reference: Peterson, K., Kuldna, P., Peev, P. and Uustal, M. 2014. Reviewing the coherence and effectiveness of implementation of multilateral biodiversity agreements in Estonia. Project Report, SEI Tallinn, Tallinn: 70 p. Project no 41064 Stockholm Environment Institute Tallinn Centre Lai Str 34 Tallinn 10133 Estonia www.seit.ee January–December 2013 Language editor: Stacey Noel, SEI Africa Lay-out: Tiina Salumäe, SEI Tallinn Photos: Kaja Peterson, SEI Tallinn ISBN: 978-9949-9501-4-0 ISSN: 1406-6637 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of acronyms and abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................................7 List of figures .............................................................................................................................................................................................8 List of tables ..............................................................................................................................................................................................8 Executive summary
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPARC NBS Newsletter 1/2014
    EUROPARC NBS Newsletter 1/2014 http://us4.campaign-archive1.com/?u=5108bdfadcd892894bfe63be6&... Subscribe Share Past Issues Translate Use this area to offer a short preview of your email's content. View this email in your browser Final countdown Ongoing year is the last presidency year for Estonia and Environmental Board. We are making our best to negotiate with possible next host of Nordic-Baltic Section secretariat. Many activities lie still ahead, such as interesting seminars about wooded grasslands and health issues. We rely on your good collaborations for the upcoming newsletters and other activities! Section secretariat 1 of 10 10.04.2014 9:34 EUROPARC NBS Newsletter 1/2014 http://us4.campaign-archive1.com/?u=5108bdfadcd892894bfe63be6&... Subscribe Share Past Issues Translate President´s corner Winter in Matsalu National Park was cold, Following species are getting special but very short. Spring migration has begun attention in Estonia this year having been with first grey-lag geese, lapwings and elected so called species of the year: sky-larks here; first hundreds of whooper Ringed Seal (Pusa hispida), Common and bewick's swans have started their Kingfisher (Alcedo atthis) and Alder song festival on Matsalu bay. Some of the Buckthorn (Rhamnus frangula). spring can be seen from home via internet - the "seal camera" of Vilsandi National In spite of good weather the mood is not Park is located in the grey-seals' kinder- very much so, the thoughts being held by garden: www.looduskalender.ee/node the tense situation in Ukraine. Who knows /19354 and "owl camera" of Matsalu how far the conflict can go, and there National Park is inside a tawny owl's nest: would be then losses both among people www.looduskalender.ee/node/19372 .
    [Show full text]
  • Wetland Tourism: Estonia - Soomaa National Park
    A Ramsar Case Study on Tourism and Wetlands Wetland Tourism: Estonia - Soomaa National Park Estonia, Soomaa. Fifth Season in a Soomaa Boat. © Mati Kose Estonia’s Soomaa National Park is a Soomaa National Park is the most popular land of peat bogs, naturally meandering rivers, wilderness tourism destination of the Baltic swamp forests and meadows on the rivers’ countries. Its tourism products are based on floodplains. Its bogs and rivers began to develop wilderness experiences, the uniqueness of around 10,000 years ago when the last of the Soomaa and its cultural heritage, and the quality European ice sheets retreated northwards. Today services that are offered by the local tourism the area contains some of the best preserved and entrepreneurs and stakeholders. most extensive raised bogs in Europe. Each spring, it is subject to spectacular floods over a vast area – The Park was established under Estonian a time of the year that is known locally as the ‘fifth legislation in 1993, and joined the PAN Parks season’. Soomaa also has rich wildlife which Network of European wilderness areas in 2009. It includes golden eagles, black storks, woodpeckers, also received an EDEN (European Destinations of owls, various kinds of bog waders such as golden Excellence) award from the European Commission plovers, wood sandpipers, whimbrel, curlew, great in 2009 for promoting sustainable tourism in and snipe, and corn crake, as well as elk, wild boar, around a protected area. The site has been listed beaver, wolf, lynx, and brown bear. as a Ramsar Wetland of International Importance since 1997. The Ramsar Secretariat selected 14 case studies for a publication on wetlands and sustainable tourism, to be launched at the 11th Conference of Parties, July 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Raised Bogs* (7110) – Estonia
    Active raised bogs* (7110) – Estonia Conservation EU28: Endangered (EUNIS D1.11) status EE: U2 (+) Protection HD: Annex I (priority habitat) status Area (2007-12) EU: 10,200 km2 EE: 1,580 km2 MS with EE (sub-reporting level), DK, BE (CON) genuine improvement Other MS AT, BE (ATL), CZ, DE, DK, ES, FI, FR, HU, IE, IT, LT, LV, NL, PL, PT, RO, SE, SI, SK, UK Photo © Herdis Fridolin Summary: Active raised bogs are a highly endangered habitat in the EU, with an estimated 90% of the original habitat lost, and the current area in unfavourable condition due to drainage, peat extraction, and afforestation. Estonia, reported an unfavourable-inadequate conservation status for the habitat in both the 2001-06 and 2007-12 periods, but a sub-reporting level improvement in the last period. This improvement resulted from strategic planning and government target setting, protection in Natura 2000 areas, and restoration projects both inside and outside conservation areas. Estonia carried out a comprehensive national inventory of mires, which was used to define the list of disturbed sites where peat extraction and drainage may still be permitted. Since 2012, the national nature conservation plan and the mire action plan set targets for peat bog restoration. Most of the active raised bog habitat is on state land, and the responsible government agency has undertaken an increasing number of large scale restoration projects. ERDF funding was used for 1,916 ha of habitat between 2007-13, and Cohesion funding has restored 369 ha since 2014, with restoration of another 4,990 ha ongoing.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolves Recolonizing Islands: Genetic Consequences and Implications for Conservation and Management
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Wolves Recolonizing Islands: Genetic Consequences and Implications for Conservation and Management Liivi Plumer1☯, Marju Keis1☯, Jaanus Remm1, Maris Hindrikson1, Inga Jõgisalu2, Peep Männil2, Marko Kübarsepp2, Urmas Saarma1* 1 Department of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia, 2 Estonian Environment Agency, Tartu, Estonia a11111 ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. * [email protected] Abstract After a long and deliberate persecution, the grey wolf (Canis lupus) is slowly recolonizing its OPEN ACCESS former areas in Europe, and the genetic consequences of this process are of particular Citation: Plumer L, Keis M, Remm J, Hindrikson M, interest. Wolves, though present in mainland Estonia for a long time, have only recently Jõgisalu I, Männil P, et al. (2016) Wolves started to recolonize the country’s two largest islands, Saaremaa and Hiiumaa. The main Recolonizing Islands: Genetic Consequences and Implications for Conservation and Management. objective of this study was to analyse wolf population structure and processes in Estonia, PLoS ONE 11(7): e0158911. doi:10.1371/journal. with particular attention to the recolonization of islands. Fifteen microsatellite loci were gen- pone.0158911 otyped for 185 individuals across Estonia. As a methodological novelty, all putative wolf- Editor: Sergios-Orestis Kolokotronis, Fordham dog hybrids were identified and removed (n = 17) from the dataset beforehand to avoid University, UNITED STATES interference of dog alleles in wolf population analysis. After the preliminary filtering, our final Received: December 16, 2015 dataset comprised of 168 “pure” wolves. We recommend using hybrid-removal step as a Accepted: June 23, 2016 standard precautionary procedure not only for wolf population studies, but also for other taxa prone to hybridization.
    [Show full text]
  • Last of the Wild
    as nature intended – best practice examples of wilderness management in the Natura 2000 network last of the wild OVERVIEW OF STATUS AND MONITORING OF SOME WILDERNESS RELATED SPECIES IN THE NATURA 2000 NETWORK last of the wild OVERVIEW OF STATUS AND MONITORING OF SOME WILDERNESS RELATED SPECIES IN THE NATURA 2000 NETWORK Published by PAN Parks Foundation 2009 supported by The sole responsibility lies with the author and the Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained here. contents contents 2 2 foreword 4 introduction 6 background 6 wilderness and wildlife 6 large spaces – large species 7 wilderness conservation in the EU 7 impetus behind further re-wilding 8 species depending on wilderness 9 large herbivores chamois 10 CENTRAL BALKAN AND RILA NATIONAL PARKS, BULGARIA MAJELLA NATIONAL PARK, ITALY ibex 14 TRIGLAV NATIONAL PARK, SLOVENIA large carnivores brown bear 17 FULUFJÄLLET NATIONAL PARK, SWEDEN RILA NATIONAL PARK, BULGARIA MAJELLA NATIONAL PARK, ITALY wolf 22 MAJELLA NATIONAL PARK, ITALY FULUFJÄLLET NATIONAL PARK, SWEDEN SOOMAA NATIONAL PARK, ESTONIA eurasian lynx 26 FULUFJÄLLET NATIONAL PARK, SWEDEN SOOMAA NATIONAL PARK, ESTONIA TRIGLAV NATIONAL PARK, SLOVENIA birds of prey white-tailed eagle 31 ARCHIPELAGO NATIONAL PARK, FINLAND conclusion 34 last of the wild – overview of status and monitoring of some wilderness related species in the natura 2000 network There are many reasons why Europe should pay more attention to its wilderness areas. Most importantly, these territories are an invaluable refuge for many species such as large mammals like the brown bear, wolf or lynx - Photo: Tamas Gereczi/gt-photo.hu foreword 4 by Hans Kampf Executive Director Large Herbivore Foundation It is more than 40 years since I realised that I wanted Secondly, at a time when they wandered and migrated to work in the field of nature conservation, preservation in enormous numbers across our regions, they influenced and development.
    [Show full text]
  • Estonia - Birds and Bears
    Estonia - Birds and Bears Dates: 20th – 27th May 2017 Estonia is situated on the Eastern coast of the Baltic Sea and is bordered by Russia to the East and Latvia to the South. The country is generally sparsely populated and once away from the major cities like Tallinn the roads are almost empty. The landscape is very flat with extensive wild bogs and rich forests, home to an abundance of wildlife. This relatively unspoilt corner of Europe contains a superb network of national parks with many tower hides scattered throughout the country making wildlife viewing easier and a real joy. Large concentrations of migratory waterfowl pass through during April and May with many species still in abundance late into spring. A trip at this time of year provides us with a very good chance of picking up a diverse variety of wildfowl including Barnacle and Brent Geese as well as Common Scoter, Velvet Scoter and Long-tailed Ducks. Other species such as White-fronted Geese, Goldeneye, Scaup, Wigeon, Pintail and Garganey are all, also likely to be encountered. It's also a great time for good numbers of passage waders, resplendent in their summer plumage including Ruff, Wood and Green Sandpipers, Temminck's Stints, Spotted Redshanks and maybe something a little more unusual such as a Broad-billed Sandpiper, Terek Sandpiper or Red-necked Phalarope. Raptors feature well with White- tailed Eagles being a daily sight along the coast whilst Montagu's, Marsh and Hen Harriers; Hobby, Honey Buzzard and Lesser-spotted Eagle are almost guaranteed. Add to this the expansive stretches of forest found throughout the country supporting a rich array of birds, animals and flowering plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Status and Conservation of Wild Land in Europe
    REVIEW OF STATUS AND CONSERVATION OF WILD LAND IN EUROPE FINAL REPORT TENDER REF: CR/2009/31 PROJECT NO: WRI/001/09 Mark Fisher1 Steve Carver1 Zoltan Kun2 Rob McMorran3 Katherine Arrell4 Gordon Mitchell4 1 Wildland Research Institute, School of Geography, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK 2 PAN Parks Foundation, PF 264, 9002 Györ, Hungary 3 Centre for Mountain Studies, Perth College UHI, Perth PH1 2BR, UK 4 School of Geography, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK 3.11.2010 Suggested citation Fisher, M., Carver, S. Kun, Z., McMorran, R., Arrell, K. and Mitchell, G. (2010). Review of Status and Conservation of Wild Land in Europe. Project commissioned by the Scottish Government. Report details This report is for the project TENDER REF: CR/2009/31 - REVIEW OF STATUS AND CONSERVATION OF WILD LAND IN EUROPE. Project commissioned by the Scottish Government Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the Steering Group for their support and comments. In addition, the authors greatly appreciate the information freely given by the following people: Toby Aykroyd, Wild Europe Initiative Dr Mike Daniels, Chief Scientific Officer, JMT Dr Torbjørn Ergon, Associate Professor Department of Biology, University of Oslo and Director of Finse Alpine Research Center. Dr Norman Henderson, Executive Director of Prairie Adaptation Research Collaborative, University of Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada Dr Keith Kirby, Natural England Chris Mahon, Chair IUCN-UK National Committee Murel Merivee, Conservation planner, Environmental Protection Agency Pärnu-Viljandi, Estonia Eleanor Newson, Grazing Advice Partnership Diana Reynolds, Head of Nature Conservation & Biodiversity Policy, Nature Conservation and Biodiversity Branch, Welsh Assembly Government Vlado Vancura PAN Parks Conservation Manager, Slovakia About the Wildland Research Institute The Wildland Research Institute is a unique UK-based research group specializing in research and policy development relating to wilderness and wildland.
    [Show full text]
  • Estonian Nature Conservation in 2007
    Diversity of Nature in Estonia Estonian Nature Conservation in 2007 Diversity of Nature in Estonia ESTONIAN NATURE CONSERVATION IN 2007 Estonian Environment Information Centre Tallinn 2008 Published as 3rd book within series “Diversity of Nature in Estonia” Editor: Lauri Klein Compiled by: Taimo Aasma, Marika Arro, Lauri Klein, Reigo Roasto, Kaire Sirel, Margit Tennokene, Rene Volt, Hanno Zingel Photographs: Arne Ader, Mati Kose, Toomas Tuul, Lauri Klein, Heiko Kruusi, Reigo Roasto, Uudo Timm, Tiina Napp, Ingmar Muusikus Cover photo: Floodplain meadow at Suitsu. Matsalu National Park. Author: Mati Kose. Design by: Tõnis Kipper Printed by: Tallinna Raamatutrükikoja OÜ, Publisher: Laki 26, 12915 Tallinn, Estonia, www.trt.ee Printed on 100% recycled paper Cyclus Off set with environmentally friendly colours Copyright: Estonian Environment Estonian Environment Information Centre Information Centre, 2008 Mustmäe tee 33, 10616 Tallinn, Estonia Phone: +372 673 7577 Fax: +372 673 7599 ISSN 1406-2399 [email protected] ISBN 978-9985-881-54-5 (hard copy) www.keskkonnainfo.ee ISBN 978-9985-881-56-9 (online) 2 Foreword Dear reader, Th e book you are holding is an overview of Es- Th e purpose of this book is to provide a com- tonian nature conservation management in 2007 pact overview of Estonian nature conserva- – 16 years after the restoration of independence tion in its current state. Following accession to and three years after accession to the European international conventions, membership of the Union. It is in these most recent years of rapid European Union and updates to legal acts on economic development that nature conservation nature conservation, many innovations have been has become one of the top topics of discussion introduced in Estonian nature conservation, and a in Estonian society.
    [Show full text]
  • Latvia and Estonia February 2013 Frans De Schamphelaere and Jasmina Malevé
    Latvia and Estonia February 2013 Frans De Schamphelaere and Jasmina Malevé Introduction After hearing about stable populations of Wolf as well as Lynx in the Baltic region, we decided to spend our week off in some of the wilder areas of Latvia and Estonia. A week is short to find (one of) both species but we gave it a try anyway, with a possible prospective of a future visit and a better background on the possibilities here. We visited Kemeru National Park near Riga in Latvia and then drove further to Estonia where we spent most of our time in and around Soomaa NP, Matsalu NP and Viimsi near Tallinn. No Lynx or Wolf was seen but we got quite close and the experience of visiting this region in a quiet moment of the year (most birdwatchers go in spring) with only short days and desolate, snowy landscapes was certainly rewarding. We learned a lot about Wolf and Lynx populations in this region (both not doing too well this winter) and about how local people look upon them. Both Lynx and Wolf are still managed as game species in Estonia, leading to some sad stories during our visit. Locals told us about Wolves being shot illegally on quite a big scale, rather high hunting quota on Lynx (when a map was shown of a not so big forest area near Matsalu where 7 Lynxes were shot during winter until now, we were quite shocked...). Wolf populations are descending fastly. On the other hand, the incredibly high forested area and low densities of inhabitants provide an ecosystem which is probably unseen in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Set out to Discover the European Wild Nature HOHE TAUERN AUSTRIA 04-05
    WILDeRNEsS Set out to discover the european wild nature HOHE TAUERN AUSTRIA 04-05 GESÄUSE AUSTRIA 06-07 WOODSMOKE ENGLAND 08-09 MAJELLA ITALIA 10-11 VERCORS FRANCE 12-13 WOLF SLOVAKIA 14-15 BERESINSKY BELARUS 16-17 KALKAPEN AUSTRIA 18-19 SAREK SWEDEN 20-21 SOOMAA ESTONIA 22-23 ADULA SWITZERLAND 24-25 ŠUMAVA CZECH REPUBLIC 26-27 LES ÉCRINS FRANCE 28-29 LIVE THE WILDERNESS IN YOUR DAILY LIFE 30-31 Whether it is the power be individually smaller and more Mountain Wilderness / france of high mountains, the fragmented than wilderness areas, For over 20 years, MW France has been promoting a global gigantic desert or the old although they often cover extensive approach of mountain in which “preservation of natural forests, the nature allows tracts. The condition of their natural environment”, “social equity” and “local economy” us to be amazed and offers us the habitat, processes and relevant species constitute the same aim. feeling of loneliness, freedom and is however often partially or substan- www.mountainwilderness.fr adventure. But if Nature gives us a tially modified by human activities lot, the artificialization of natural such as livestock herding, hunting, spaces and urbanization threaten fishing, forestry, sport activities or it. Indeed, the human impact general imprint of human artifacts.” EWS / Austria increases, jeopardizing the natural The European Wilderness Society is the only Pan-European, balance. The wilderness concept has wilderness and environmental advocacy non-profit organi- gained considerable momentum zation with a dedicated multi-cultural and very experienced To cope with this situation, a large in Europe during the last 15 years.
    [Show full text]
  • LEGEND Tourist Information National Park More Details Overleaf
    LEGEND Tourist information National park More details overleaf KM Võru Virtsu Viljandi Valga Tartu Tallinn Rapla Rakvere Pärnu Põlva Petseri Paide Otepää Narva Luhamaa Kärdla Kuressaare Jõhvi Jõgeva Ikla Harbor Beach E 67 2 Road number Haapsalu 310 77 199 254 258 101 91 203 111 314 378 155 300 314 344 34 155 266 226 176 Ikla 208 147 110 137 197 194 149 248 65 216 268 164 174 340 233 210 217 302 189 KEHRA Town Village (over 2500 inhabitants) Hamlet (400 – 2500 inhabitants) Jõgeva 119 242 79 138 51 159 136 78 171 102 150 72 93 161 153 262 320 113 Jõhvi 206 300 197 223 136 165 216 68 251 184 234 152 178 48 240 300 381 1 Sagadi manor 12 Kuremäe monastery 22 Panga cliff 2 Kuressaare castle 13 Setu museum 23 Saka cliff Kuressaare 351 76 249 295 330 216 184 315 152 355 409 248 313 429 385 189 3 Narva castle 14 Põlva peasant museum 24 Ehalkivi boulder 344 111 233 288 292 135 125 234 145 340 402 189 306 348 378 Kärdla 4 Rakvere castle 15 Mõniste open air museum 25 Jägala waterfall Luhamaa 34 307 162 104 102 291 266 227 233 59 29 205 78 286 5 Haapsalu castle 16 Mihkli farm museum 26 Keila-Joa waterfall Narva 252 351 265 271 184 213 264 116 299 192 282 200 226 6 Koguva village 17 A. H. Tammsaare museum 27 Devil’s Grave crater 7 Vormsi church in Vargamae 28 The Pit crater Otepää 44 235 84 47 42 231 192 167 161 42 109 145 8 Ruhnu church 18 Kaali crater 29 Sipa basswood Paide 171 170 72 163 103 93 64 84 99 151 201 9 Muhu church 19 Kõpu lighthouse 30 Suur-Munamägi Petseri 65 331 179 136 98 287 262 223 257 54 10 Pöide church 20 Valaste waterfall observation
    [Show full text]