DOCSLIB.ORG

Macedonia: Guns, Policing and Ethnic Division

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Macedonia: Guns, Policing and Ethnic Division REPORT Small arms and security in South Eastern Europe Saferworld and Bonn International Center for Conversion Macedonia: Guns, policing and ethnic division Anna Matveeva with Duncan Hiscock, Wolf-Christian Paes and Hans Risser October 2003 Macedonia: Guns, policing and ethnic division Anna Matveeva with Duncan Hiscock, Wolf-Christian Paes and Hans Risser SAFERWORLD AND BONN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR CONVERSION OCTOBER 2003 Macedonia International boundary Autonomous province boundary Republic boundary Montenegro Sofia Prisˇtina KOSOVO Vranje SERBIA Prizen BULGARIA Kriva Palanka Lipkovo Vratnica Kumanovo Tearce Kratovo Blagoevgrad Aracˇinovo Tetovo SKOPJE Probistip Delcˇevo Kocˇani Sveti Nikole Gostivar Sˇtip Titov Veles Berovo ALBANIA MACEDONIA Radovisˇ Debar Brod Kicˇevo Negotino Kavadarci Strumica Novo Selo Krusˇevo Prilep Valandovo Murgasˇevo Struga Gevgelija Elbasan Ohrid Resen Bitola GREECE Thessaloníki Contents Acronyms 4 Preface 5 Executive summary 7 1. Recent history of Macedonia 12 2. Security challenges in the new state 15 3. Prospects and obstacles for disarmament 43 4. Disarmament options in a multi-ethnic state 58 APPENDIX 1: Report from the Skopje roundtable meeting 64 ‘Small arms and light weapons in Macedonia: priorities for action’, March 2003 APPENDIX 2: Skopje roundtable agenda and list of participants 69 Acknowledgements This report was produced as part of Saferworld’s small arms project in South Eastern Europe. Saferworld is grateful to the UK Government for funding their small arms programme. Saferworld would like to thank Larry Attree, Chrissie Hirst, Zoran Jachev, Aleksandar Matovski, Dana Plavcova and Trpe Stojanovski for their respective contributions to the report. Thanks also go to Henry Bolton, Kim Benedict Johnsen, Edward Joseph, Ann Rogers and Simon Rynn for their comments and feedback. Acronyms ABB Army Border Brigade ANA Albanian National Army (Armata Kombëtare Shqiptare – AKSh in Albanian) APC Armoured personnel carrier ARI Army of the Republic of Ilirida ARM Armija na Republika Makedonija (the Armed Forces of the Republic of Macedonia) BCP Border check point BCPR UNDP Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery BICC Bonn International Center for Conversion DDR Disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration DPA Democratic Party of Albanians DUI Democratic Union for Integration (Bashkimi Demokratik për Integrim – BDI in Albanian). EAR EU European Agency for Reconstruction EUFOR European Union Force FRY Former Republic of Yugoslavia FYROM Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia HCNM High Commissioner on National Minorities ICRC International Committee of the Red Cross IMF International Monetary Fund IOM International Organisation for Migration IWPR Institute for War and Peace Reporting JNA Jugoslovenska Narodna Armija (Yugoslav Peoples’ Army) KFOR Kosovo Force KLA Kosovo Liberation Army (Ushtria Çlirimtare e Kosovës – UÇK in Albanian) KPC Kosovo Protection Corps MoD Ministry of Defence MoI Ministry of the Interior (Ministerstvo za vnatreshni raboti – MVR in Macedonian) MPRI Military Professional Resources Incorporated NCB National Co-ordination Body NDP National Democratic Party NLA National Liberation Army (Ushtria Çlirimtare Kombëtare – UÇK in Albanian) OSCE Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe PDP Party of Democratic Prosperity PfP NATO Partnership for Peace RPG Rocket propelled grenade SACIM Small Arms Control in Macedonia SADU UNDP Small Arms and Demobilisation Unit SALW Small arms and light weapons SAM Surface-to-air missile SDSM Socijaldemokratski Sojuz na Makedonija (Social Democratic Union of Macedonia) SECI Center Southeast European Cooperative Initiative Center for Combating Cross- Border Crime SEE South Eastern Europe SEESAC South Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons SFRY Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia UÇPMB Ushtria Çlirimtare e Preshevës, Medvegjës dhe Bujanocit (Liberation Army of Presevo, Medvedja and Bujanovac) UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNHCR The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UNMIK United Nations Mission in Kosovo UNPREDEP United Nations Preventive Deployment Force VMRO- Vnatreshnata makedonska revolucionerna organizacija – Demokratska DPMNE partija za makedonsko nacionalno edinstvo (Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organisation-Democratic Party of Macedonian National Unity) Preface THROUGHOUT THE 1990S, Macedonia was held up as an oasis of peace and stability whilst conflict affected most of South Eastern Europe, although by 1999 the conse- quences of the conflict in Kosovo were beginning to exacerbate tensions between the two communities in Macedonia. However, overt armed conflict did not appear until 2001, when Macedonia became the next link in a chain of conflicts that had accom- panied the break-up of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY). The easy availability of arms contributed to instability and created a strong temptation to use violence to settle political scores.In an impoverished and poorly functioning economy, the line between political and criminal activity became increasingly blurred. When fighting broke out in 2001 between rival Macedonian and Albanian communities, the international community machine that was engaged in nearby Kosovo was again galvanised into action to broker a peace agreement and help plot the way forward. Despite continued instability, the peace process has been gaining momentum, and the country’s prospects for developing a viable state and a functioning economy have improved with a return to comparatively stable and responsible governance in September 2002, in contrast to the political adventurism of the previous administra- tion. However, the proliferation of small arms and light weapons (SALW) inside the country and the high level of smuggling across Macedonia’s borders remain significant problems and continue to endanger peace. The political crisis in 2001 broke the taboo against the use of violence, and today arms are more visible, and more likely to be used than before the conflict. In such circumstances, collecting weapons and introducing effective gun control measures form an important pillar of the conflict prevention agenda. Now that there is a new government in office and the political tension has lessened, this is an opportune moment to address the issue of SALW in Macedonia, both by exploring the dimensions of the SALW problem itself, and by assessing national and international policies in the field of human security. The report seeks to explore the prospects for weapons collection programmes and the introduction of effective gun control measures in the current security environment in Macedonia. With the government weapons amnesty due to start on 1 November 2003, the report takes a timely look at its chances for success – and considers the possible implications if the amnesty does not go as planned. The chapter on ‘Sources and Scale of Arms Proliferation’ was written with valuable input from Zoran Jachev, Trpe Stojanovski and Aleksandar Matovski.1 The report is based on two fact-finding missions undertaken in July 2002 and January 2003, surveys of openly available sources, and conclusions and observations drawn from 1 In January 2002 Saferworld commissioned Forum – Center for Strategic Research and Documentation to produce a background research report on SALW in Macedonia. Parts of the report were used to prepare the current publication. 6 MACEDONIA: GUNS, POLICING AND ETHNIC DIVISION Saferworld’s and BICC’s other activities in the region. The report first analyses the nature of the problem of SALW proliferation by asking the following questions: how was the present situation arrived at? How did the initial armament take place? Who are the groups holding weapons and how do they operate? Why does the population continue to hold on to their guns? It then goes on to assess national and international measures that have so far been undertaken to tackle the problem, i.e. political commit- ments to disarmament, police reform, steps to revise the law and address cross-border crime, and public attitudes and the role of civil society. It concludes with an outline of the pros and cons of various disarmament options, and the implications that their implementation might have in Macedonia. The main argument of the paper is that the problem of SALW proliferation in Macedonia is a question of both politics and policing, resulting both from internal challenges and from the country’s vulnerability to outside influence within its turbulent neighbourhood. Therefore, measures to tackle the problem have to combine increased confidence among citizens in the political process with building public support for disarmament without letting criminal groups benefit from more humane approaches. The international community has expressed its willingness to help. The question now is how this willingness will be utilised by political forces in Macedonia. Executive summary THIS REPORT IS CONCERNED with the issue of small arms and light weapons (SALW) proliferation in Macedonia. Before the 2001 crisis, when fighting broke out between ethnic Macedonians and ethnic Albanians, most people in the country did not consider SALW proliferation to be a serious problem. This has now changed, and the government that was elected in September 2002, made up of the Social Democratic Union of Macedonia (SDSM) and the Democratic Union for Integration (DUI), con- cerned that the large number of illegally-held guns could act as a further catalyst for violence, has placed measures
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia in 2018
    ENERGY AND WATER SERVICES REGULATORY COMMISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA APRIL 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 201 8 Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia in 2018 ENERGY AND WATER SERVICES REGULATORY COMMISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA ___________________________________________________________________ The Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia for 2018 has been prepared in accordance with Article 36 from the Energy Law, which establishes the obligation of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission to submit the Annual Report for its operation during the previous year to the Assembly of the Republic of North Macedonia, not later than 30th of April of the current year. The Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission for 2018 contains detailed information on the performance of the competences according to the Energy Law and the Law on Setting Prices of Water Services, as well as information on the material-financial operation. The Energy Law also determines that the Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission needs to be submitted to the Government of the Republic of North Macedonia and the Ministry competent for the performance of the assignments within the energy area, so that they could be informed, as well as to the Energy Community Secretariat. The Report contains overview of the activities performed by the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission during 2018, with special review of: − State of the energy markets, − State of the prices and tariffs regulation, − Preparing regulatory acts, − International activities and − Financial Statement of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Makedonische Frage Von
    Geschichte und Politik / Südosteuropa Die makedonische Frage von Andreas Schwarz Stand: 06.08.2020 1 Inhaltsverzeichnis 0 Vorwort....................................................................................................................11 1 Einleitung – Das antike und das heutige Makedonien........................................14 1.1 Das antike Makedonien und die antiken Makedonier.....................................................14 1.2 Das heutige Makedonien....................................................................................................15 1.3 Die heutigen Makedonier...................................................................................................16 1.4 Die ethnischen bzw. slawischen Makedonier....................................................................16 1.5 Die Sprache der ethnischen bzw. slawischen Makedonier..............................................17 1.6 Die griechischen Makedonier.............................................................................................17 1.7 Fazit………………………………......................................................................................17 2 Der Frieden von San Stefano und Makedonien...................................................18 2.1 Hintergrund – Die Balkankrise........................................................................................18 2.2 Der Frieden von San Stefano............................................................................................18 2.3 Auszüge aus dem Friedensvertrag von San Stefano......................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Policy Yearbook 2008.Pdf
    Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs Minoritenplatz 8 A-1014 Vienna Tel: During office hours on work days between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. 0 50 11 50-0 / international: +43 50 11 50-0 or: (01) 90 115-0 / int.: (+43-1) 90 115-0 For general information: 0800 234 888 (toll free number, cannot be dialled from outside Austria) Fax: 0 50 11 59-0 / international: +43 50 11 59-0 or: (01) 904 20 16-0 / international: (+43-1) 904 20 16-0 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.bmeia.gv.at Citizens’ Help Desk In case of emergency abroad the Citizens’ Help Desk can be reached 24 hours a day: Tel: 0 50 11 50-4411 / international: +43 50 11 50-4411 or: (01) 90 115-4411 / international: +43 1 90 115-4411 Fax: 0 50 11 59-4411 / international: +43 50 11 59-4411 or: 0 50 11 59-245 / international: +43 50 11 59-245 or: (01) 904 20 16-245 / international: (+43-1) 904 20 16-245 E-Mail: [email protected] Assistance services available to Austrian citizens abroad are detailed on the homepage of the Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs at www.bmeia.gv.at under “Service”.  Austrian Foreign Policy Yearbook 2008 Report by the Federal Minister for European and International Affairs  Proprietor and Publisher: Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs A-1014 Vienna, Minoritenplatz 8 Austria Edited and Coordinated by: Thomas Schlesinger Christoph Weidinger Clemens Geelhaar Monika Lemmerer English translation coordinated by: Sabine Hübler Printed by: Manz Crossmedia GmbH & Co KG A-1051 Vienna, Stolberggasse 26 Austria The original German version is available at: www.bmeia.gv.at, or in printed form in the Information Management, Documentation, Knowledge Management Department at the Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs Preface In 2008, the international community faced a number of very special challenges, ranging from the global economic crisis and the problems of the European energy supply at the beginning of the year to the conflicts in Georgia and Gaza.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Systems Practice (Lsp) Activity Local Works Macedonia | Civil Society Organizational Network Analysis (Ona)
    LOCAL SYSTEMS PRACTICE (LSP) ACTIVITY LOCAL WORKS MACEDONIA | CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONAL NETWORK ANALYSIS (ONA) JUNE 2018 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by LINC LLC and local partner, the Macedonian Center for International Cooperation (MCIC). USAID Local Systems Practice June 2018 Prepared by: Craig Hempfling, LINC; Megan McDermott, LINC; Jenna White, LINC; Patrick Sommerville, LINC; Aleksandar Krzalovski, MCIC; Emina Nuredinoska, MCIC; Aleksandra Savevska, MCIC; Boris Ristovski, MCIC; Monika Bozinoska, MCIC; and Jasmina Ristovska, MCIC Front cover: Network map of Macedonian CSOs. Acknowledgements: The author(s) would like to acknowledge all of our LSP consortium partners for their input throughout the process, the valuable assistance of MCIC support staff in ensuring a thorough and timely analysis, as well as all of the organizations who took the time to participate in the Network Analysis survey. These contributions are crucial for advancing our mutual efforts towards improved local development in Macedonia. About Local Systems Practice: Local Systems Practice is a USAID-funded activity that directly assists multiple Missions, partners, and constituents to design and adaptively manage systems-based programs in complex environments. The concept has been designed to aid Missions and partners to overcome four specific challenges to effective Local Systems Practice through: a) Listening; b) Engagement; c) Discovery; and d) Adaptation. The Theory of Change underpinning the activity asserts that the application of systems tools to complex local challenges at multiple intervals throughout the program cycle will enhance the sustainability of programming, resulting in better-informed, measurable interventions that complement and reinforce the systems they seek to strengthen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kosovo Protection Corps. a Critical Study of Its De
    The Kosovo Protection Corps A Critical Study of its De-activation as a Transition Ade Clewlow Department of Security and Conflict Management Affairs International of Institute Norwegian Security in Practice 4 · 2010 [NUPI Report] Publisher: The Norwegian Institute of International Affairs Copyright: © Norwegian Institute of International Affairs 2010 ISBN: 978-82-7002-273-1 Any views expressed in this publication are those of the author. They should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. The text may not be printed in part or in full without the permission of the author. Visiting address: C.J. Hambros plass 2 d Address: P.O. Box 8159 Dep. 0033 Oslo Norway Internet: www.nupi.no E-mail: [email protected] Fax: [+ 47] 22 36 21 82 Tel: [+ 47] 22 99 40 00 The Kosovo Protection Corps A Critical Study of its De-activation as a Transition Ade Clewlow Lieutenant Colonel, MBE, Former KFOR Liaison Officer to the KPC The final KPC parade before De-Activation This report is part of the Norwegian engagement in the Multinational Experiment 6 (MNE-6). The project is financed by the Norwegian Ministry of Defence and is managed by the Innovation, Network Capabilities and Information Infrastructure Command (INI). Besides NUPI, the Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI) and the Defence Staff College are also engaged in the programme. Further information can be found at: http://mne.oslo.mil.no Context This paper has been written from a practitioner’s perspective. The author spent 6 months embedded with the Kosovo Protection Corps (KPC) command team, spending hours in their company during its de-activation.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonian Project,”
    PUBLISHED VERSION Tubilewicz, Czeslaw Taiwan's “Macedonian Project,” 1999–2001 The China Quarterly, 2004; 179:782-803 © The China Quarterly, 2004 Originally Published at: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=ISH PERMISSIONS http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displaySpecialPage?pageId=4676 Institutional repositories 2.4. The author may post the VoR version of the article (in PDF or HTML form) in the Institutional Repository of the institution in which the author worked at the time the article was first submitted, or (for appropriate journals) in PubMed Central or UK PubMed Central or arXiv, no sooner than one year after first publication of the article in the Journal, subject to file availability and provided the posting includes a prominent statement of the full bibliographical details, a copyright notice in the name of the copyright holder (Cambridge University Press or the sponsoring Society, as appropriate), and a link to the online edition of the Journal at Cambridge Journals Online. 23 April 2014 http://hdl.handle.net/2440/46919 Research Report Taiwan’s “Macedonian Project,” 1999–2001 Czeslaw Tubilewicz ABSTRACT Since 1989, Taipei has attempted to capitalize on the systemic changes in East Central Europe. It achieved its goal of winning diplomatic allies among the post-communist states only in 1999, when Macedonia recognized the Republic of China (ROC) hoping that Taipei’s generosity would resolve its economic problems. In order to showcase the effectiveness of its assistance, Taipei resorted to economic diplomacy and offered Skopje loans, humanitarian and technical assistance. Yet, the Macedonian–Taiwanese partnership ended in 2001. This report will argue that Taipei failed to become a viable alternative to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as Skopje’s economic and diplomatic partner because of China’s clout in international affairs and its own reluctance to shower Macedonia with developmental assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century
    US Army TRADOC TRADOC G2 Handbook No. 1 AA MilitaryMilitary GuideGuide toto TerrorismTerrorism in the Twenty-First Century US Army Training and Doctrine Command TRADOC G2 TRADOC Intelligence Support Activity - Threats Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 15 August 2007 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. 1 Summary of Change U.S. Army TRADOC G2 Handbook No. 1 (Version 5.0) A Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century Specifically, this handbook dated 15 August 2007 • Provides an information update since the DCSINT Handbook No. 1, A Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century, publication dated 10 August 2006 (Version 4.0). • References the U.S. Department of State, Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism, Country Reports on Terrorism 2006 dated April 2007. • References the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), Reports on Terrorist Incidents - 2006, dated 30 April 2007. • Deletes Appendix A, Terrorist Threat to Combatant Commands. By country assessments are available in U.S. Department of State, Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism, Country Reports on Terrorism 2006 dated April 2007. • Deletes Appendix C, Terrorist Operations and Tactics. These topics are covered in chapter 4 of the 2007 handbook. Emerging patterns and trends are addressed in chapter 5 of the 2007 handbook. • Deletes Appendix F, Weapons of Mass Destruction. See TRADOC G2 Handbook No.1.04. • Refers to updated 2007 Supplemental TRADOC G2 Handbook No.1.01, Terror Operations: Case Studies in Terror, dated 25 July 2007. • Refers to Supplemental DCSINT Handbook No. 1.02, Critical Infrastructure Threats and Terrorism, dated 10 August 2006. • Refers to Supplemental DCSINT Handbook No.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Macedonian Textile
    OCCASIONAL PAPER N. 8 TTHHEE HHIISSTTOORRYY OOFF TTHHEE MMAACCEEDDOONNIIAANN TTEEXXTTIILLEE IINNDDUUSSTTRRYY WWIITTHH AA FFOOCCUUSS OONN SSHHTTIIPP Date: November 29th, 2005 Place: Skopje, Macedonia Introduction- the Early Beginnings and Developments Until 1945 The growth of the Macedonian textile sector underwent diverse historical and economic phases. This industry is among the oldest on the territory of Macedonia, and passed through all the stages of development. At the end of the 19th century, Macedonia was a territory with numerous small towns with a developed trade, especially in craftsmanship (zanaetchistvo). The majority of the population lived in rural areas, Macedonia characterized as an agricultural country, where most of the inhabitants satisfied their needs through own production of food. The introduction and the further development of the textile industry in Macedonia were mainly induced by the needs of the Ottoman army for various kinds of clothing and uniforms. Another reason for the emerging of the textile sector was to satisfy the needs of the citizens in the urban areas. An important factor for the advancement of this industry at that time was the developed farming, cattle breeding in particular. (stocharstvo). The first textile enterprises were established in the 1880‟s in the villages in the region of Bitola – Dihovo, Magarevo, Trnovo, and their main activity was production of woolen products. Only a small number of cotton products were produced in (zanaetciski) craftsmen workshops. The growth of textiles in this region was natural as Bitola, at that time also known as Manastir, was an important economic and cultural center in the European part of Turkey.[i] At that time the owners and managers of the textile industry were businessmen with sufficient capital to invest their money in industrial production.
    [Show full text]
  • English and INTRODACTION
    CHANGES AND CONTINUITY IN EVERYDAY LIFE IN ALBANIA, BULGARIA AND MACEDONIA 1945-2000 UNDERSTANDING A SHARED PAST LEARNING FOR THE FUTURE 1 This Teacher Resource Book has been published in the framework of the Stability Pact for South East Europe CONTENTS with financial support from the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It is available in Albanian, Bulgarian, English and INTRODACTION..............................................3 Macedonian language. POLITICAL LIFE...........................................17 CONSTITUTION.....................................................20 Title: Changes and Continuity in everyday life in Albania, ELECTIONS...........................................................39 Bulgaria and Macedonia POLITICAL PERSONS..............................................50 HUMAN RIGHTS....................................................65 Author’s team: Terms.................................................................91 ALBANIA: Chronology........................................................92 Adrian Papajani, Fatmiroshe Xhemali (coordinators), Agron Nishku, Bedri Kola, Liljana Guga, Marie Brozi. Biographies........................................................96 BULGARIA: Bibliography.......................................................98 Rumyana Kusheva, Milena Platnikova (coordinators), Teaching approches..........................................101 Bistra Stoimenova, Tatyana Tzvetkova,Violeta Stoycheva. ECONOMIC LIFE........................................103 MACEDONIA: CHANGES IN PROPERTY.......................................104
    [Show full text]
  • Parties and Elections Macedonia November 2004 ZA4326
    ZA-Archiv Nummer 4326 Parties and Elections Macedonia November 2004 ZA4326 POLL - November 2004 1. If parliamentary elections were held next week, which party would you vote for? (DO NOT READ OUT OPTIONS) 1.Social-Democratic Union of Macedonia 2. VMRO-DPMNE 3. Liberal Democratic Party 4. Liberal Party 5. Democratic Union for Integration 6. The third way 7. VMRO-Peoples party 8. Democratic Party of Albanians 9. Party for Democratic Prosperity 10. other 11. no one 12. do not know 13. no answer 2. Which politician do you trust the most? (DO NOT READ OUT OPTIONS) 1. no one 2. do not know 3. no answer 4. Hari Kostov 5. Vlado Buchkovski 6. Nikola Gruevski 7. Arben Xaferi 8. Ali Ahmeti 9. Radmila Shekerinska 10. Tito Petkovski 11. Nikola Popovski 12. Stevcho Jakimovski 13. Branko Crvenkovski 14. Trifun Kostovski 15. Vasil Tupurkovski 16. Abdulafman Bexeti 17. Rufi Osmani 18. Sashko Kedev 19. Stojan Andov 20. Risto Penov 21. Qubisav Ivanov-Yingo 22. Ganka Samoilova Cvetanovska 23. Ilinka Mitreva 24. Dosta Dimovska 25. Marijan Gjorchev 26. Ljubcho Georgievski 27. Ljupcho Jordanovski 28. Pavle Trajanov 29. other (write who) _______________ 1 ZA4326 3. According to you, who will be the new president of the Social-Democratic Union? 1. Radmila Shekerinska 2. Vlado Buchkovski 3. Nikola Popovski 4. Tito Petkovski 5. Ilinka Mitreva 6. do not know (DO NOT READ OUT) 7. no answer (DO NOT READ OUT) 4. Do you consider that the present Government is corrupted? 1. yes 2. no 3. do not know 4. no answer (DO NOT READ OUT) 2 ZA4326 DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RESPONDENT (5) Gender 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Roma in the Republic of Macedonia: Challenges and Inequalities in Housing, Education and Health
    briefing Roma in the Republic of Macedonia: Challenges and Inequalities in Housing, Education and Health Andrea Spitálszky Young girl in Roma settlement, Republic of Macedonia. Andrea Spitalszky, April 2018. Acknowledgements Project: From action to equal rights for Roma. IPA/2015/382006. This project is funded by the European Union. This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of Roma Democratic Development Association SONCE and Minority Rights Group International and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Roma Democratic Development Association SONCE Minority Rights Group International The Roma Democratic Development Association SONCE is a Minority Rights Group International (MRG) is a non-governmental organization working at the local, national non-governmental organization (NGO) working to secure and international levels to promote civil integration, democratic the rights of ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities and rights and equal opportunities for Roma in the Republic of indigenous peoples worldwide, and to promote cooperation Macedonia. Founded in 1996 as an informal self-help group for and understanding between communities. Our activities are the Roma community in the Municipality of Tetovo and officially focused on international advocacy, training, publishing and registered in 1999 as a non-profit organization, SONCE has outreach. We are guided by the needs expressed by our implemented more than 50 projects over the past two decades worldwide partner network of organizations, which represent in a range of areas including education, health and social care, minority and indigenous peoples. employment and democratic participation of Roma.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    E2120 EMP Checklist for Construction and Rehabilitation Activities General Guidelines for use of EMP checklist: For low-risk topologies, such as school and hospital rehabilitation activities, the ECA Public Disclosure Authorized safeguards team developed an alternative to the current EMP format to provide an opportunity for a more streamlined approach to preparing EMPs for minor rehabilitation or small-scale works in building construction, in the health, education and public services sectors. The checklist-type format has been developed to provide “example good practices” and designed to be user friendly and compatible with safeguard requirements. The EMP checklist-type format attempts to cover typical core mitigation approaches to civil works contracts with small, localized impacts. It is accepted that this format provides the key elements of an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) or Environmental Management Framework (EMF) to meet World Bank Environmental Assessment requirements under OP 4.01. The intention of this checklist is that it would be applicable as guidelines for the small works contractors and constitute an Public Disclosure Authorized integral part of bidding documents for contractors carrying out small civil works under Bank-financed projects. The checklist has three sections: Part 1 includes a descriptive part that characterizes the project and specifies in terms the institutional and legislative aspects, the technical project content, the potential need for capacity building program and description of the public consultation process. This section could be up to two pages long. Attachments for additional information can be supplemented when needed. Part 2 includes an environmental and social screening checklist, where activities and potential environmental issues can be checked in a simple Yes/No format.
    [Show full text]