1 the Chronicle of John of Nikiu: Historical Writing in Post-Roman
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Chronicle of John of Nikiu: Historical Writing in Post-Roman Egypt Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Felege-Selam Solomon Yirga Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2020 Dissertation Committee David Bernhard Brakke, Advisor Anthony Kaldellis Kristina Marie Sessa 1 Copyrighted by Felege-Selam Solomon Yirga 2020 2 Abstract While there has been a great deal of work on the late seventh-century Chronicle of John, the anti-Chalcedonian Bishop of Nikiu, since its 1883 publication and French translation by Hermann Zotenberg, there have been few modern studies devoted exclusively to the author and his work. What is more, these modern studies primarily engage with the text as a source of data for the reign of Emperor Herakleios, and the Arab conquest of Egypt, meaning that modern historians often read past the author to a layer of sources beneath them. This positivist utilitarian view of the Chornicle often involves reducing John’s worldview to that of a monophysite historian and a Coptic proto-nationalist, and as such interprets the relevant data through this framework. Modern scholarship has further transposed this world view onto the author’s world, creating the impression that the Chronicle presents a narrative which reflects the development of a Coptic identity characterized primarily by hostility towards the Chalcedonian church, and the Roman state which had previously supported it. Anything in the text which challenges this view is dismissed as the product of John of Nikiu’s method of compiling sources and inverting pro-Chalcedonian and pro-Roman sentiments where they appear. This dissertation moves beyond the heretofore utilitarian-positivist approaches. It instead argues that the entire Chronicle must be viewed as a complete work which, while compiled from a variety of identifiable and unidentifiable sources, still reveals a coherent ii and distinct historical narrative and theory of history, and one that does not neatly align with the theological and historical positions of the Egyptian Severan Church. This dissertation examines John of Nikiu’s theory of history and prescriptive guidelines through a series of challenges to established scholarly views of the Chronicle. The first chapter challenges the notion that the Chronicle reflects a parochial view of world history centered primarily on Egypt and its monophysite Christian population and as such represents a break from the Byzantine world, which had left an indelible mark on the education and worldview of the bishop of Nikiu. It argues that John’s theory of history, as it applies to the realm of politics, focuses primarily on the effects of individual actors on the broader safety and stability of the entire Christian oikoumene, rather than the Egyptian Christian population alone. The third and fourth chapters challenge the image of John as a mere compiler of data. Chapter 3reveals one dimension of his theory of history by demonstrating the presence of a coherent mechanism of God’s interaction with humanity in human history. It studies God’s dynamic interactions with the Roman state, the Christian church, and the citizens of the empire more broadly, by focusing primarily on the depiction of natural disasters and floods. I argue that John used natural disasters as a narrative tool that demonstrated the precise mechanical outcomes of individual moral and ethical failures and successes. Rather than explaining how one ought to live a morally and ethically upright life (according to the guidelines prescribed by John himself), the Chronicle answers the question of why one ought to live in this manner. Chapter 4 reveals a second important dimension of the bishop of Nikiu’s theory of history, the role of Satan and his iii demonic army. The outsized role of demonic forces on the plot of the narrative reveals the text’s monastic outlook, which ultimately serves to further highlight the way in which lapses in moral and religious discipline invite the destructive influence of the demonic and diabolic forces that threaten the security of the Christian oikoumene. The final chapter seeks to understand how John of Nikiu conceived of his own doctrinal and theological position.. The Chronicle provides a history of the Egyptian Severan Church not as an independent institution, but as a community of true orthodox believers within a universal church that was besieged by heretics—Chalcedonians, pagans, Arians, and non-Severan anti-Chalcedonians—who used the state and Church to persecute the community of true believers. Together the four chapters reveal that John used as his framework the Byzantine genre of the universal chronicle to present an ethically prescriptive metanarrative of world history, which explains the long-term consequences of the ethical successes and shortcomings of individual actors. This ethical approach enabled him to connect the community of Egyptian Christians to a long, and universal Christian tradition. In other words, John sought to remind his Coptic-reading audience that they were still part of a universal Christian community by showing how their own actions had a significant impact on the well-being of all Christians, despite the fact that by his own time, doctrinal disputes and half a century of alienation from the Roman empire had substantially separated Egypt from Rome. iv Dedication For my Mother and Father v Acknowledgments This dissertation is the product of the input, advice, editing, and influence of many dear friends and mentors. First, my advisor, David Brakke, was infinitely patient with me for the duration of my time engaged in research and writing and acted as an endless source of references and kind, thoughtful, and productive comments on draft after draft. Anthony Kaldellis’s depth of knowledge and brilliant insights while commenting on drafts of the present work can only be matched by his generosity: Anthony was the first person to contact me when my graduate studies began, and was endlessly supportive even when this project seemed hopelessly incoherent. Tina Sessa’s comments and encouragement through the later stages of the process were invaluable. Tina introduced me to the world of Late Antiquity as a young graduate student interested in the political history of Byzantium and Aksum. Without her this dissertation could not have been conceived. But beyond the members of my committee, many have been key influences to the articulation of ideas in this work. Chief among these is Kevin Van Bladel, who first introduced me to John of Nikiu, and whose language instruction truly opened my eyes to the world of Late Antiquity beyond the borders of the Byzantine Empire and its Greek- speakers. Eyob Derillo assisted me with access to Or. 818 at the British Library in London, and Solomon Gebreyes Beyene’s comments and published writings have been most helpful to me in understanding Ethiopian historiography. vi This dissertation was completed with the support of a Junior Fellowship from Dumbarton Oaks Research Collection and Library, where I stayed for the academic year 2019-2020. The community of scholars I met there had a tremendous impact on me intellectually and personally, and I would like to thank in particular Anna Stavrakopoulou, Dimiter Angelov, Elizabeth Bolman, Derek Krueger, Claudia Rapp, Warren Woodfin, John Duffy, Savvas Kyriakides, Joshua Robinson, Alyson Williams, Jakub Kabala, Arianna Gullo, Kostas Konstantinidis, Alisdair Grant, Flavia Vanni, and Héléna Rochard. To the above I must add those who sat with me either online or at cafes and bars throughout Columbus and Washington, D.C., to talk with me about my Egyptian bishop. Chief among these are Verena Krebs, Michael Beshay, Kyle Shimoda, Isacar Bolanos, Reyna Esquivel-King, Joel Dowlingsoka, Augustine Dickinson, Matthew Kinloch, Mikael Muehlbauer, Sarah Porter, Ammanuel Gashaw, and Jonathan Hsieh, who shared the burden of talking me through emotional lows and highs through the writing processes, and were just as key to my intellectual development as my committee. Finally, my sister Fanaye Solomon Yirga never shied away from lending me her considerable talents as a philologist and thinker. The main arguments of my research emerged in conversation with her, and she devoted much time to convincing me that not everything I had produced was totally irreparable. Kevin Diep and Nick Smith also bore more than their fair share of conversation about ancient historiography and in many ways this work is a response to the many insightful questions they posed to me about the ancient and medieval worlds since we first met in 2008. If the reader finds anything of vii merit in this work, they may credit it to the good cheer, outstanding intellect, and endless patience of friends, mentors, and family, named and unnamed. The rest is my fault. viii Vita 2008: International Community School of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2012: B.A. History, Minor in Classics and Medieval and Renaissance Studies, Brandeis University Autumn 2015: M.A., History, The Ohio State University Autumn 2013 to present: Graduate Teaching Associate, Department of History, The Ohio State University Fields of Study Major Field: History ix Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................... ii Dedication ..........................................................................................................................