Green Social Europe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Green Social Europe Thoughts on Social Policy from the European Greens Foreword by Jean Lambert, Green MEP for London Jean Lambert MEP Green Party, London www.jeanlambertmep.org.uk Every day, newspapers from around has stopped decision-makers from equality and strengthened welfare the world dedicate untold column seeing society as a whole and rights across Europe. The essays inches to the global economic crisis from realising that for many, this is contained in this pamphlet, contri- that has gripped much of the inter- a social crisis, brought to life by buted by Green/EFA Members of national community. Buried deep the fear of losing their jobs or their the European Parliament Employ- beneath the jargon, you could ability to house and feed their ment and Social Affairs Committee, almost be forgiven for thinking that families. For the Greens, this is a offer just a taste of this vision and social concerns have disappeared problem — austerity measures give examples of the work in which from the political agenda. must never come at the expense the Green/EFA Group is currently of social investment. engaged in. It is clear that for some governments the crisis is being used as an excuse There is no doubt that the crisis The response to the current economic to attack long established rights, presents a real challenge, but it is climate can also be the beginning such as the right to strike, collective also an opportunity to make the of a more inclusive society, where agreements and social security transition to the green, sustainable market rules are never allowed to systems. Across Europe, govern- society that we so urgently need: override fundamental social rights. ments are implementing draconian a future which guarantees equal Quite simply, no other approach spending cuts; gutting essential opportunities, equal rights and will do. services, increasing unemployment robust social protection for all. and disproportionately hitting those A future which guarantees invest- most in need in a vain attempt to ment in both people and society. satisfy the markets that they were unwilling to control. The Green New Deal sets out a strategy to overcome the crisis We are running the risk of developing whilst transforming the economic a severe case of tunnel vision. Our and industrial framework to pro- overwhelming preoccupation with vide decent employment, high the financial dimension of the crisis quality public services, gender Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Social Funds — tackling poverty and exclusion 2 Article 9: “…That in defining and implementing its Elisabeth Schroedter MEP policies and activities, the Union shall take into account Securing Europe’s future —why young people matter 4 requirements linked to the promotion of a high level of Emilie Turunen MEP employment, the guarantee of adequate social protection, A minimum income for all 6 the fight against social exclusion, and a high level of Jean Lambert MEP education, training and protection Making homelessness a priority 8 of human health.” Karima Delli MEP National Reform Plans —wanted: audience for 10 a greener and more social Europe Marije Cornelissen MEP Women in the economic crisis— 12 progress not setbacks for gender equality Raül Romeva i Rueda MEP Strengthening the social economy— 14 a vital role for co–ops, mutuals and Fair Trade Sven Giegold MEP Linking bailouts to social guarantees 16 Tatjana Ždanoka MEP Social Funds— tackling poverty and exclusion Elisabeth Schroedter MEP Bündnis 90/Die Grünen, Germany [email protected] 2 The number of people at risk of the financing of new and integrated Social Entrepreneurship Programme’ However, if we are to take the fight poverty in the EU is on the rise, strategies which reach beyond which provides micro-credit to against social exclusion and poverty currently amounting to 84 million traditional labour market policies and people who want to set up a small in the EU seriously, we must back people or 17 per cent of the EU help prevent the passing down of business but would not be granted up these warm words with funding population. Austerity measures poverty from generation to generation. credit in the traditional banking and action. adopted throughout the EU are sector; ‘Progress’, which finances disproportionately hitting the most The proposal also states that 20 per EU-wide pilot projects in the area of deprived, yet the EU 2020 strategy cent of the ESF should be earmark- employment and social policy; and sets the target of lifting 20 million ed for the fight against poverty. Over EURES, which promotes workers’ people out of poverty by 2020. the last few years, Member States mobility to better match job opportu- What action is the EU taking to reduced the share of the ESF in the nities and job seekers across the EU. ensure that Member States live Structural Funds budget from 40 The draft of the EPSCI programme, up to this commitment? per cent to 22 per cent. Therefore, however, over-emphasises employ- the Greens in the European Parlia- ment as the primary answer to social The regulations governing the ment welcome the Commission’s exclusion and poverty. ¹ The EU Structural Funds are designed to narrow the Structural Funds¹ set out eleven proposal to introduce a minimum gap between the rich and poor parts of Europe priorities, including the fight against share for the ESF of the overall The Greens in the European Parlia- by reducing the differences in development between poverty. Two instruments are budget, namely 52 per cent for more ment will take a clear line in the regions. The majority of spending is allocated to three funds: The European Regional Development Fund, particularly important in achieving developed regions, 40 per cent for negotiations on the Structural Funds the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund. this goal. transition regions and 25 per cent and the ESF. Some Member States, for deprived regions. as well as other Groups in the Euro- The European Social Fund (ESF) is pean Parliament, have already crucial in bringing about investment The European Programme for voiced their opposition against the in people. For the funding period Social Change and Social Innovation courageous Commission proposal 2014—2020, the Commission added (EPSCI) is the second programme, to earmark 20 per cent of the ESF two priorities to the ESF, namely consisting of three strands aimed at for the fight against poverty, stating the fight against poverty and early helping people out of social exclus- that they will not accept such inter- school drop–out. This allows for ion: the ‘Microfinance Facility and ference by the Commission. Securing Europe’s future— why young people matter Emilie Turunen MEP Socialistisk Folkeparti, Denmark [email protected] 4 Youth unemployment is one of the bargaining power. The trend is simi- which gives every young person in major challenges for Europe. It is lar across Europe: labour market the EU the right to a job, an appren- not without reason that the current organisation is falling apart, as well ticeship, further training or employ- generation of young Europeans are as wages and working conditions ment if they have been out of work known as the “the lost generation”. for the newcomers. for four months. Other measures in the Youth on the Move initiative The economic crisis has triggered There is an urgent need to act. We include a call for better regulation of a sudden and dramatic increase in need to find solutions that not only apprenticeships and internships and unemployment, particularly amongst provide more jobs for young people, EU funding for young entrepreneurs. the young. More than one in five but which also ensure that those young Europeans are unemployed, jobs are secure and long–term. The EU has shown willing in coming creating tremendous pressure on together to combat youth unemploy- wages and working conditions. In A report adopted by the European ment. What we need now is for Spain, for example, young people Parliament in July 2010 proposed governments to take action. Member often end up in temporary positions a number of suggestions on how to States must make youth unemploy- ¹ ‘On promoting youth access to the labour with little protection, while millions tackle youth unemployment.¹ Fortu- ment a political priority. Austerity market, strengthening trainee, internship and of young graduates in Italy, France, nately, it seems that the work of alone cannot save Europe alone apprenticeship status’ Emilie Turunen MEP, 14th June 2010: Germany and the UK are working the Parliament has had an impact. — it is time to stand up for Europe’s for free as interns. young people. The Commission has included a http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc. number of the Parliament’s sugg- do?pubRef=–//EP//TEXT+REPORT+A7–2010– It is also a fact that young people estions in its flagship initiative 0197+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN don’t tend to join trade unions, ‘Youth on the Move’,² which aims ²‘Youth on the Move: An initiative to unleash which is not only a crisis for the at equipping Europe’s youth for the potential of young people to achieve unions but a crisis for the new the future. smart, sustainable and inclusive growth in generation in the labour market, the European Union’ too. Without organisation, young European Commission, 15th September 2010: Most notably, the scheme includes people are left alone with no strong the European Youth Guarantee, http://ec.europa.eu/education/yom/com_en.pdf A minimum income for all Jean Lambert MEP Green Party, UK [email protected] 6 Currently, 24 out of 27 countries in The European Greens want to see people into poverty, not least when Human dignity is inviolable.
Recommended publications
  • (CAL) Calls for Caroline Spelman MP to Be Held
    19 March 2012 ‘Clean Air in London’ (CAL) calls for Caroline Spelman MP to be held accountable and resign for the UK misleading the European Commission (Commission) over its Plans and Programmes for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and other serious public health failings Commission will be asking the UK authorities to comment on CAL’s claim that the UK unlawfully obtained a time extension until 2011 to comply with the PM10 daily limit value in London because the public was not consulted on time on the updated air quality plan UK set to be fast-tracked to the Court of Justice of the European Union if breaches of PM10 air quality laws are confirmed in London i.e. just two steps short of £300m per annum fines Three cheers for Jean Lambert MEP, Keith Taylor MEP, Darren Johnson AM, Jenny Jones AM, Caroline Lucas MP and the Green Party for their effective teamwork and action to protect public health. We now need others to act urgently Clean Air in London (CAL) lodged a formal complaint in two parts with the European Commission (Commission) on 15 January 2012 over the UK’s failure to comply with air quality laws in London and elsewhere (the Complaint). Details can be seen at: http://cleanairinlondon.org/legal/clean-air-in-london-lodges-complaint-over-breaches-of-air-pollution- laws-in-london/ Jean Lambert and Keith Taylor, Green Party MEPs for London and the South East of England, wrote to Commissioner Potočnik, European Commissioner for the Environment, in support of CAL’s Complaint and have now received a formal response.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament 2014-2019
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Transport and Tourism TRAN_PV(2018)0524_1 MINUTES Meeting of 24 May 2018, 09.00-12.00 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 09.05 on Thursday, 24 May 2018, with Karima Delli (Chair) presiding. 24 May 2018, 9.00 – 12.30 1. Adoption of agenda Decision: The draft agenda was adopted. 2. Chair’s announcements *** Electronic vote *** 3. Common rules for the operation of air services in the Community TRAN/8/08880 ***I 2016/0411(COD) COM(2016)0818 – C8-0531/2016 Rapporteur: Claudia Țapardel (S&D) Responsible: TRAN Vote on the decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations Decision: Adopted.: 35 votes to 1, with 0 abstentions Mobility package vote: 4. Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures TRAN/8/10069 ***I 2017/0114(COD) COM(2017)0275 – C8-0171/2017 Rapporteur: Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy (S&D) PR – PE615.363v03-00 Responsible: TRAN* Opinions: ECON – Decision: no opinion PV\1154028EN.docx PE622.227v01-00 EN United in diversity EN ENVI* – Seb Dance (S&D) AD – PE613.289v03-00 AM – PE618.020v01-00 AM – PE618.021v01-00 Adoption of draft report Amendments Comp 1, Comp 2, AM 26, Envi AM 27, AM 227, AM 262, AM 28, adopted: Comp 3,Comp 4, Comp 4A, Comp 5A, Comp 6, Comp 7, Comp 7A, AM 39, Comp 8, AM342, AM 152, Comp 9, Comp 10, AM 407, AM 413, AM 53, AM 414, Comp 11, AM 57, Comp 12, AM 58, Envi AM 52, Comp 14, AM 470,AM 480, AM 63, AM 77, AM 81, Envi AM 1, Envi AM 2, Envi AM 4, Envi AM 5, Comp 15, AM 2, AM 3, Envi AM 10, Comp 16, AM 103, AM 107, AM 104, AM 4, Envi AM 8, AM 5, Comp 17, AM 112, AM 7, AM 8, Comp 18, Comp 19, AM 10, Envi AM 16, Comp 20, Comp 21, AM 148, AM 12, AM 13, AM 171, AM 174,Comp 22, AM 180, Comp 23,AM 195, AM 196 Decision: Adopted.: 35 votes to 2, with 3 abstentions Correction of MEP Schmidt meant to vote against in the final vote vote: Vote on the decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations Decision: Adopted.: 38 votes to 1, with 1 abstentions 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the UK-EU Relationship in Post-Brexit Britain
    Rethinking the UK-EU Relationship in Post-Brexit Britain Article by Beatrice White November 27, 2020 Over four years since the controversial Brexit referendum, the prospect of a no- deal exit from the EU seems increasingly likely for the UK. Amid this uncertainty, the Green Party of England and Wales must adopt a clear position on the future UK-EU relationship, tackling key questions about the role of the UK in today’s world. While the challenges of operating as a small party in a Conservative- dominated political landscape cannot be underestimated, opportunities also emerge to strengthen old collaborations and build new ones with allies across Europe. With the end of the transition period fast approaching, time is running out for Britain and the EU to ratify a Brexit deal. The European Parliament has announced plans to hold an additional plenary between Christmas and New Year, to have chance to vote on a potential deal which has still failed to materialise as deadlines pass one after the other. A no-deal exit for the United Kingdom seems increasingly likely, thanks to the rhetoric and actions of Prime Minister Boris Johnson and his Conservative Government, despite the continued attempts of Members of Parliament to take this option off the table. In this context, it might seem surprising that Brexit was not a topic high on the agenda at the Autumn Conference of the Green Party of England and Wales, which took place online in October, particularly given the impact that a deal, or lack thereof, will have on a wide range of areas from trade and the economy to fisheries and the future of the UK as a union.
    [Show full text]
  • Timetable for Green Party Spring Conference 2007 Brangwyn Hall, Swansea March 22Nd to 25Th 2007
    Timetable for Green Party Spring Conference 2007 Brangwyn Hall, Swansea March 22nd to 25th 2007 BH1 = Brangwyn Hall, Main Stage CRm 3, 3a, 3b, 4, 5, 6 = Committee Rooms BH2 = Brangwyn Hall, opposite end to stage MAIN = Brangwyn Hall (for plenaries and panel sessions) Time Rooms Thursday 22nd March 1200 - 1900 Registration 1145 - 1415 Lunch 1745 - 2015 Dinner 1230 - 1350 BH1 Workshop on motion A1 (SOC report) 1300 - 1350 BH2 Towards an Education DVP, 1 of 2, Democracy and the running of schools, Rachel Fryer, Education Working Group CRm3 Workshop on motion C2 (Tidal generation in estuaries) CRm5 Basic Media Training, Jim Killock, External Comms Co-ordinator 1400 – 1430 MAIN Opening Remarks (Rhodri Griffiths); followed by the GREEN PARTY’s Response to the Budget 1430 – 1550 MAIN PANEL DISCUSSION ON SWANSEA LAGOON AND SEVERN BARRAGE, with Peter Ullman (Tidal Electric), John Redman (Balfour Beatty), Peter Jones (RSPB) and Mark Phillips (Swansea Inst of Higher Education) 1600 - 1650 BH1 Workshop on motions C5 and C6 (1600Climate Change, rain forests and peat and 1625C/C policy simplification) BH2 Workshop on motions C1 and C3 (1600Environmental Education and 1620Food in Schools) CRm3 Fringe by panel speaker; Peter Ullman, MD of Tidal Electric, who are backing the Swansea Lagoon CRm5 SOS - exploration for oil and gas in Cardigan Bay, Leila Kiersch CRm6 Fringe by panel speaker 1700 - 1820 MAIN PLENARY – SOC REPORT, Emergency Motions 1830 - 1920 BH1 Workshop on motion B1 – International Voting Paper – 1 of 2 BH2 Workshop on motions C10and C11
    [Show full text]
  • 19.11.2020 A9-0211/48 Amendment 48 Damian Boeselager, François
    19.11.2020 A9-0211/48 Amendment 48 Damian Boeselager, François Alfonsi, Diana Riba i Giner, Mounir Satouri, Caroline Roose, Ernest Urtasun, Marie Toussaint, Damien Carême, Reinhard Bütikofer, Tatjana Ždanoka, Yannick Jadot, Ciarán Cuffe, Jordi Solé, Monika Vana, Claude Gruffat, Sergey Lagodinsky, Thomas Waitz, David Cormand, Francisco Guerreiro, Karima Delli on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó, Antoni Comín i Oliveres, Clara Ponsatí Obiols, Milan Brglez, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Kateřina Konečná, Leila Chaibi Report A9-0211/2020 Pascal Durand Stocktaking of European elections (2020/2088(INI)) Motion for a resolution Citation 16 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment – having regard to the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2019 on Case C-502/19 (preliminary ruling on Junqueras i Vies case), Or. en AM\1218753EN.docx PE658.420v01-00 EN United in diversityEN 19.11.2020 A9-0211/49 Amendment 49 Damian Boeselager, François Alfonsi, Diana Riba i Giner, Mounir Satouri, Caroline Roose, Ernest Urtasun, Marie Toussaint, Damien Carême, Reinhard Bütikofer, Tatjana Ždanoka, Yannick Jadot, Ciarán Cuffe, Jordi Solé, Monika Vana, Claude Gruffat, Sergey Lagodinsky, Thomas Waitz, David Cormand, Francisco Guerreiro, Karima Delli on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó, Antoni Comín i Oliveres, Clara Ponsatí Obiols, Milan Brglez, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Kateřina Konečná, Leila Chaibi Report A9-0211/2020 Pascal Durand Stocktaking of European elections (2020/2088(INI)) Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment 3a.
    [Show full text]
  • To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula Von Der Leyen, Rue De La Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels
    To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula von der Leyen, Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels To the Executive Vice-President of the European Commission Mr. Vladis Dombrovskis Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels Brussels, 22 October 2020, Subject: the EU must impose an import ban on Chinese companies using forced labour Dear President von der Leyen, Dear Vice-President Dombrovskis, For years, the Chinese regime has been detaining millions of human beings in camps, just because they were born Uyghurs. For years, Europe and the world have been witnessing a crime against humanity without opposing any resistance to it. In recent months, several studies have reported the use of Uyghur forced labour for the benefit of major European companies. Indeed, many Chinese factories, directly supplying EU brands exploit the Uyghurs and benefit from their forced labour. Facing this abjection, Europe must act to protect the lives and fundamental rights of Uyghurs. The EU should use its trade and market power to safeguards the founding principles enrichened in our Treaties and guiding our external policies. As the US did lately through an imports ban passed almost unanimously in the US House of Representatives, Europe urgently needs to establish a blacklist of Chinese companies implicated in Uyghur forced labour. We look forward to your response. Yours sincerely, 1. Raphaël Glucksmann, S&D 2. Dietmar Köster, S&D 3. Francisco Guerreiro, Greens 4. Sylvie Guillaume, S&D 5. Aurore Lalucq, S&D 6. Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Renew 7. Anna Cavazzini, Greens 8. Nora Mebarek, S&D 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Parties and Elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Green Par Elections
    Chapter 1 Green Parties and Elections, 1979–2019 Green parties and elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Wolfgang Rüdig Introduction The history of green parties in Europe is closely intertwined with the history of elections to the European Parliament. When the first direct elections to the European Parliament took place in June 1979, the development of green parties in Europe was still in its infancy. Only in Belgium and the UK had green parties been formed that took part in these elections; but ecological lists, which were the pre- decessors of green parties, competed in other countries. Despite not winning representation, the German Greens were particularly influ- enced by the 1979 European elections. Five years later, most partic- ipating countries had seen the formation of national green parties, and the first Green MEPs from Belgium and Germany were elected. Green parties have been represented continuously in the European Parliament since 1984. Subsequent years saw Greens from many other countries joining their Belgian and German colleagues in the Euro- pean Parliament. European elections continued to be important for party formation in new EU member countries. In the 1980s it was the South European countries (Greece, Portugal and Spain), following 4 GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE their successful transition to democracies, that became members. Green parties did not have a strong role in their national party systems, and European elections became an important focus for party develop- ment. In the 1990s it was the turn of Austria, Finland and Sweden to join; green parties were already well established in all three nations and provided ongoing support for Greens in the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2014
    European Parliament Elections 2014 Updated 12 March 2014 Overview of Candidates in the United Kingdom Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 CANDIDATE SELECTION PROCESS ............................................................................................. 2 3.0 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS: VOTING METHOD IN THE UK ................................................................ 3 4.0 PRELIMINARY OVERVIEW OF CANDIDATES BY UK CONSTITUENCY ............................................ 3 5.0 ANNEX: LIST OF SITTING UK MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ................................ 16 6.0 ABOUT US ............................................................................................................................. 17 All images used in this briefing are © Barryob / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-3.0 / GFDL © DeHavilland EU Ltd 2014. All rights reserved. 1 | 18 European Parliament Elections 2014 1.0 Introduction This briefing is part of DeHavilland EU’s Foresight Report series on the 2014 European elections and provides a preliminary overview of the candidates standing in the UK for election to the European Parliament in 2014. In the United Kingdom, the election for the country’s 73 Members of the European Parliament will be held on Thursday 22 May 2014. The elections come at a crucial junction for UK-EU relations, and are likely to have far-reaching consequences for the UK’s relationship with the rest of Europe: a surge in support for the UK Independence Party (UKIP) could lead to a Britain that is increasingly dis-engaged from the EU policy-making process. In parallel, the current UK Government is also conducting a review of the EU’s powers and Prime Minister David Cameron has repeatedly pushed for a ‘repatriation’ of powers from the European to the national level. These long-term political developments aside, the elections will also have more direct and tangible consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the European Parliament Mr Janusz
    Members of the European Parliament Mr Janusz Wojciechowski Commissioner for Agriculture European Commission Rue de la Loi 200 B-1049 Bruxelles Mr Virginijus Sinkevičius Commissioner for Environment, Oceans and Fisheries European Commission Rue de la Loi 200 B-1049 Bruxelles Brussels, 11 November 2020 Subject: Deforestation and illegal logging of Romania’s primary forests Dear Commissioners, we, the undersigned Members of the European Parliament, are addressing you to express our deep concerns about massive violations of the protection of Natura 2000 areas, primary and ancient forests and UNESCO World Heritage Sites in Romania. In Romania, deforestation caused by illegal logging is continuing on an alarming scale. It threatens the last and irreplaceable primary forests in the EU, which are more crucial than ever in the fight against climate change and for the preservation of biodiversity. According to expert estimates, up to two thirds of the EU’s remaining primary forests are located in Romania. Largely untouched areas in the Romanian Carpathian Mountains and the Făgăraș Mountains have survived until today – a European if not global heritage of invaluable ecological value. Some of these forests are also included in the List of World Heritage Sites UNESCO.1 Now, ruthless greed and large-scale corruption are seriously endangering these European natural treasures and the time for protective measures is running out. If no immediate action is taken, the still existing forests will soon be lost forever. Since the launch of the European Commission’s infringement procedure against Romania on 12 February 2020 for failing to establish effective measures against illegal logging2, thousands more hectares were destroyed.
    [Show full text]
  • Onderzoek Stemgedrag
    Colofon Auteur: Iris van Hulsenbeek Begeleider: Anna Domingo Amsterdam, april 2011 Instituut voor Publiek en Politiek (onderdeel van het Huis voor democratie en rechtsstaat) Prinsengracht 915 1017 KD Amsterdam 020-521 76 00 [email protected] www.publiek-politiek.nl 2 Inleiding 3 H.1. Werking van het Europees Parlement 5 H.2. Partijcohesie 8 H.3. Convergentie tussen de partijen 13 H.4. Beleidsonderwerpen 17 Conclusie 22 Bijlage 1 24 Bronvermelding 25 3 Inleiding Het eerste jaar van de zevende zitting van het Europees Parlement is afgerond. Een mooi moment om terug te blikken en conclusies te trekken. In juni 2009 vonden de verkiezingen voor het Europees Parlement plaats en werden 25 Nederlandse Europarlementariërs gekozen om de komende vijf jaar plaats te nemen in het Parlement. Het Instituut voor Publiek en Politiek (IPP)1 beschikt over data van de hoofdelijke stemmingen van de Nederlandse parlementsleden en hierdoor ligt de mogelijkheid vrij om deze gegevens te analyseren. Door deze informatie te interpreteren kan er onderzoek gedaan worden naar het stemgedrag van de Nederlandse parlementariërs. In 2009 is namens het IPP al onderzoek gedaan naar het stemgedrag van de Nederlandse Europarlementariërs in de periode oktober 2007 tot en met september 2008. Belangrijke conclusies van dat onderzoek waren: • Het stemgedrag van Europarlementariërs is vooral te verklaren vanuit een links/rechts ideologie en niet vanuit nationale belangen. In slechts 9,5% van de gevallen stemmen alle Nederlandse Europarlementariërs hetzelfde. • Het gemeenschappelijk stemgedrag binnen de delegaties ligt veel hoger. De cohesie binnen de verschillende politieke partijen ligt tussen de 0,94 en 0,99, waarbij 1 maximale cohesie is.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Party
    Royaume-Uni 73 élus Parti pour Démocrates libéraux Une indépendance de Parti conservateur ECR Parti travailliste PSE l’indépendance du Les Verts PVE ALDE l'Europe NI Royaume-Uni MELD 1. Vicky Ford MEP 1. Richard Howitt MEP 1. Andrew Duff MEP 1. Patrick O’Flynn 1. Paul Wiffen 1. Rupert Read 2. Geoffrey Van Orden 2. Alex Mayer 2. Josephine Hayes 2. Stuart Agnew MEP 2. Karl Davies 2. Mark Ereira-Guyer MEP 3. Sandy Martin 3. Belinda Brooks-Gordon 3. Tim Aker 3. Raymond Spalding 3. Jill Mills 3. David Campbell 4. Bhavna Joshi 4. Stephen Robinson 4. Michael Heaver 4. Edmond Rosenthal 4. Ash Haynes East of England Bannerman MEP 5. Paul Bishop 5. Michael Green 5. Andrew Smith 5. Rupert Smith 5. Marc Scheimann 4. John Flack 6. Naseem Ayub 6. Linda Jack 6. Mick McGough 6. Dennis Wiffen 6. Robert Lindsay 5. Tom Hunt 7. Chris Ostrowski 7. Hugh Annand 7. Andy Monk 7. Betty Wiffen 7. Fiona Radic 6. Margaret Simons 7. Jonathan Collett 1. Ashley Fox MEP 1. Clare Moody 1. Sir Graham Watson 1. William Dartmouth 1. David Smith 1. Molly Scott Cato 2. Julie Girling MEP 2. Glyn Ford MEP MEP 2. Helen Webster 2. Emily McIvor 3. James Cracknell 3. Ann Reeder 2. Kay Barnard 2. Julia Reid 3. Mike Camp 3. Ricky Knight 4. Georgina Butler 4. Hadleigh Roberts 3. Brian Mathew 3. Gawain Towler 4. Andrew Edwards 4. Audaye Elesady South West 5. Sophia Swire 5. Jude Robinson 4. Andrew Wigley 4. Tony McIntyre 5. Phil Dunn 5.
    [Show full text]