DOCSLIB.ORG

Norfolk Boreas Limited Document Reference: 5.3.5.2 Pursuant To: APFP Regulation 5(2)(G) Date: June 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Norfolk Boreas Limited Document Reference: 5.3.5.2 Pursuant To: APFP Regulation 5(2)(G) Date: June 2019 Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Appendix 5.2 Habitats Regulations Assessment Onshore Screening Author: Royal HaskoningDHV Applicant: Norfolk Boreas Limited Document Reference: 5.3.5.2 Pursuant to: APFP Regulation 5(2)(g) Date: June 2019 Photo: Ormonde Offshore Wind Farm Date Issue Remarks / Reason for Issue Author Checked Approved No. 14/02/2019 01D First draft for Norfolk Boreas Limited review GC, DT PP JKL/ VR/JT 22/03/2019 02D Second Draft for Consultee review GC, DT BH DT JL 17/05/2019 01F Final for DCO submission KC DT JL Norfolk Boreas Onshore HRA Screening Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm 5.3.5.2 June 2019 Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of this document ....................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Background................................................................................................. 2 1.3 HRA Legislation, Policy and Guidance ...................................................................... 5 1.4 The HRA Process ..................................................................................................... 7 1.5 Process for the Identification of European and Ramsar Sites and Features Potentially Affected by the Project ........................................................................................... 9 1.6 HRA Stage 1 Screening Process .............................................................................. 10 2 Designated Sites Potentially Affected by the Project .............................................. 12 2.1 European and Ramsar sites included in the Screening Assessment ......................... 12 3 Baseline Environment ........................................................................................... 19 3.1 Data sources ......................................................................................................... 19 3.2 Desk study data .................................................................................................... 26 3.3 Field survey data .................................................................................................. 29 4 Screening Assessment ........................................................................................... 38 4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 38 4.2 River Wensum SAC ............................................................................................... 38 4.3 Paston Great Barn SAC .......................................................................................... 41 4.4 Norfolk Valley Fens SAC ........................................................................................ 42 4.5 The Broads SAC .................................................................................................... 44 4.6 Broadland SPA ...................................................................................................... 46 4.7 Broadland Ramsar site .......................................................................................... 47 5 Summary .............................................................................................................. 49 6 References ........................................................................................................... 53 7 Annex 1 Bewick Swan, Whooper Swan and Pink footed Geese Sensitivity maps ..... 54 7.1 Bewicks Swan ....................................................................................................... 54 7.2 Whooper Swan ..................................................................................................... 55 7.3 Pink Footed Geese Sensitivity maps – Broadland SPA ............................................ 56 8 Annex 2 Paston Great Barn SAC barbastelle core foraging areas ............................. 59 9 Annex 3 Figures .................................................................................................... 70 Norfolk Boreas Onshore HR Screening Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm 5.3.5.2 June 2019 Page ii Tables Table 1.1 Suggested tiers for undertaking a staged cumulative impact assessment (JNCC and Natural England, 2013a) 8 Table 1.2 The ZOI of potential effects for relevant environmental parameters 11 Table 2.1 European and Ramsar sites within 5km of the onshore infrastructure 12 Table 2.2 River Wensum SAC qualifying features 13 Table 2.3 Paston Great Barn SAC qualifying features 14 Table 2.4 Norfolk Valley Fens SAC qualifying features 14 Table 2.5 The Broads SAC qualifying features 15 Table 2.6 Qualifying features of the Broadland SPA (population counts are derived from the SPA citation) 16 Table 2.7 Qualifying features of the Broadland Ramsar site (population counts are derived from the Ramsar Information Sheet) 17 Table 3.1 Data sources 20 Table 3.2 National Fish Population Database records for bullhead, brook lamprey and brown trout 26 Table 3.3 Barbastelle records for all transects located within 5km of Paston Great Barn 32 Table 3.4 Agricultural fields in North Walsham District: peak count of waterbird species across six visits 34 Table 3.5 Habitats along the Hundred Stream: peak count5 of waterbird species across six visits 34 Table 3.6 North Norfolk Coast between Eccles-on-Sea and Paston: peak count5 of waterbird species across six visits 35 Table 3.7 Habitat footprints within the onshore project area within 5km of Paston Great Barn SAC 36 Table 4.1 The ZOI of potential indirect effects on the River Wensum SAC boundary 40 Table 4.2 The ZOI of potential indirect effects on the River Wensum SAC ex-situ habitats 40 Table 4.3 The ZOI of potential indirect effects on the Paston Great Barn SAC boundary 41 Table 4.4 Norfolk Valley Fens SAC component SSSIs 42 Table 4.5 The ZOI of potential indirect effects on the Norfolk Valley Fens SAC boundary 43 Table 5.1 Screening summary 50 Plates Plate 7.1 Sensitivity map for the Bewick’s Swan for the Broadland SPA (Natural England) 54 Plate 7.2 Sensitivity map for the Whooper Swan for the Broadland SPA (Natural England) 55 Norfolk Boreas Onshore HRA Screening Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm 5.3.5.2 June 2019 Page iii Plate 8.1 Feeding distribution (1986/87 to 2012/13 - all records) of Pink-footed Geese in relation to the Broadland SPA. For key see Section 8.1.1. 57 Plate 8.2 Feeding distribution (2008/09 to 2012/13 - new records) of Pink-footed Geese in relation to the Broadland SPA. For key see Section 8.1.1. 58 Figures (Annex 3) Figure 9.1 Norfolk Boreas onshore project area (1:60,000) Figure 9.2 Designated sites and 5km buffer (1:60,000) Figure 9.3 Agricultural habitats within 5km of Broadland SPA (1:30,000) Figure 9.4 Coastal and wetland habitats within 5km of Broadland SPA (1:25,000) Figure 9.5 Paston Great Barn SAC - Norfolk Barbastelle Study Group Core foraging areas (1:10,000) Norfolk Boreas Onshore HRA Screening Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm 5.3.5.2 June 2019 Page iv Glossary of Acronyms HRA Habitats Regulations Assessment AA Appropriate Assessment AfL Agreement for Lease BCT Bat Conservation Trust cSAC Candidate SAC DCLG Department for Communities and Local Government DCO Development Consent Order Defra Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs EAOW East Anglia Offshore Wind Limited EC European Commission EEC European Economic Community EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ES Environmental Statement EU European Union HDD Horizontal Directional Drilling HRA Habitats Regulations Assessment HRGN Habitats Regulations Guidance Note IROPI Imperative Reasons of Overriding Public Interest JNCC Joint Nature Conservation Committee LSE Likely Significant Effect NBIS Norfolk Biodiversity Information Service NBSG Norfolk Barbastelle Study Group NSER No Significant Effects Report NVC National Vegetation Classification O&M Operational and Maintenance ODPM Office of the Deputy Prime Minister pSAC Possible SACs pSPA Possible SPA SAC Special Area of Conservation SCI Sites of Community Importance SNCB Statutory Nature Conservation Bodies SPA Special Protection Area SPR Scottish Power Renewables (UK) Limited SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest TEU Treaty of the European Union VWPL Vattenfall Wind Power Ltd ZAP Zone Appraisal and Planning ZDA Zone Development Agreement ZOI Zone of Influence Norfolk Boreas Onshore HRA Screening Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm 5.3.5.2 June 2019 Page v Glossary of Terminology Landfall Where the offshore cables come ashore at Happisburgh South Link boxes Underground chambers or above ground cabinets next to the cable trench housing low voltage electrical earthing links. Mobilisation zone Area within which a mobilisation area will be located. National Grid Area within which the work will be undertaken to complete the necessary overhead line modification to the existing 400kV overhead lines. temporary works National Grid The permanent footprint of the National Grid substation extension. substation extension Natura 2000 site / A network of nature protection areas in the territory of the European Union. It is European site made up of Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) and Special Protection Areas (SPAs) designated under the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive, respectively. Necton National Grid The grid connection location for Norfolk Boreas and Norfolk Vanguard substation Onshore cables The cables which take power and communications from landfall to the onshore project substation Onshore
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
    Appendix A Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Consultation Draft March 2015 1 Blank 2 Part One - Flooding and Flood Risk Management Contents PART ONE – FLOODING AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT ..................... 5 1. Introduction ..................................................................................... 5 2 What Is Flooding? ........................................................................... 8 3. What is Flood Risk? ...................................................................... 10 4. What are the sources of flooding? ................................................ 13 5. Sources of Local Flood Risk ......................................................... 14 6. Sources of Strategic Flood Risk .................................................... 17 7. Flood Risk Management ............................................................... 19 8. Flood Risk Management Authorities ............................................. 22 PART TWO – FLOOD RISK IN NORFOLK .................................................. 30 9. Flood Risk in Norfolk ..................................................................... 30 Flood Risk in Your Area ................................................................ 39 10. Broadland District .......................................................................... 39 11. Breckland District .......................................................................... 45 12. Great Yarmouth Borough .............................................................. 51 13. Borough of King’s
    [Show full text]
  • Appropriate Assessment (Submission)
    June 2007 North Norfolk District Council Planning Policy Team Telephone: 01263 516318 E-Mail: [email protected] Write to: Jill Fisher, Planning Policy Manager, North Norfolk District Council, Holt Road, Cromer, NR27 9EN www.northnorfolk.org/ldf All of the LDF Documents can be made available in Braille, large print or in other languages. Please contact 01263 516321 to discuss your requirements. Core Strategy Appropriate Assessment (Submission) Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 The Appropriate Assessment Process 4 3 Consultation and Preparation 5 4 Evidence gathering for the Appropriate Assessment 6 European sites that may be affected 6 Characteristics and conservation objectives of the European sites 8 Other relevant plans or projects 25 5 Appropriate Assessment and Plan analysis 28 Tables Table 4.1 - Broadland SPA/SAC qualifying features 9 Table 4.2 - Great Yarmouth North Denes SPA/SAC 12 Table 4.3 - North Norfolk Coast SPA/SAC qualifying features 15 Table 4.4 - Norfolk Valley Fens SAC qualifying features 19 Table 4.5 - Overstrand Cliffs SAC qualifying features 21 Table 4.6 - Paston Great Barn SAC qualifying features 23 Table 4.7 - River Wensum SAC qualifying features 24 Table 4.8 - Neighbouring districts Core Strategy progress table 27 Table 5.1 - Screening for likely significant effects 29 Table 5.2 - Details of Settlements in policies SS1, SS3, SS5 and SS7 to SS14 and how policy amendments have resulted in no likely significant effects being identified 35 Maps Map 4.1 - Environmental Designations 7 Map 4.2 - Broadland Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Boreas Limited Document Reference: 5.1.9.17 Pursuant to APFP Regulation: 5(2)(Q)
    Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Consultation Report Appendix 9.17 Norfolk Boreas Onshore Ecology and Ornithology outgoing documents Applicant: Norfolk Boreas Limited Document Reference: 5.1.9.17 Pursuant to APFP Regulation: 5(2)(q) Date: June 2019 Revision: Version 1 Author: Copper Consultancy Photo: Ormonde Offshore Wind Farm This page is intentionally blank. Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Appendices Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Environmental Impact Assessment Onshore Ecology and Ornithology Method Statement Document Reference: PB5640-004-005 Author: Royal HaskoningDHV Date: January 2018 Applicant: Norfolk Boreas Ltd Date Issue Remarks / Reason for Issue Author Checked Approved No. 10/11/2017 01D Internal draft for review GC DT AD 13/11/2017 02D Second Draft GC DT 20/11/2017 03D Draft provided to Vattenfall for review GC DT JL 19/02/2018 01F Issue to consultees GC CD JL 30/01/2018 02F Removed reference to agreement on odonata GC CD CD surveys in section 1.2.3. This method statement has been prepared by Royal HaskoningDHV on behalf of Norfolk Boreas Limited in order to build upon the information provided within the Norfolk Boreas Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Scoping Report. It has been produced following a full review of the Scoping Opinion provided by the Planning Inspectorate. All content and material within this document is draft for stakeholder consultation purposes, within the Evidence Plan Process. Many participants of the Norfolk Boreas Evidence Plan Process will also have participated in the Norfolk Vanguard Evidence Plan Process. This document is presented as a complete standalone document however in order to maximise resource and save duplication of effort, the main areas of deviation from what has already been presented through the Norfolk Vanguard Evidence Plan Process and PEIR or in the Norfolk Boreas Scoping Report are presented in orange text throughout this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Regulations Assessment: Breckland Council Submission Core Strategy and Development Control Policies
    Habitats Regulation Assessment of the Site Specific Allocations & Policies Document, Wymondham Area Action Plan, Long Stratton Area Action Plan and Cringleford Neighbourhood Development Plan, undertaken for South Norfolk Council October 2013 Natural Environment Team HRA of Site Allocations Document, Wymondham AAP, Long Stratton AAP and Cringleford Neighbourhood Plan for South Norfolk Council October 2013 Habitats Regulation Assessment of the Site Specific Allocations and Policies Document, the Wymondham Area Action Plan, the Long Stratton Area Action Plan and the Cringleford Neighbourhood Development Plan Executive Summary As required by the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, before deciding to give consent or permission for a plan or project which is likely to have a significant effect on a European site, either alone or in combination with other plans or projects, the competent authority is required to make an appropriate assessment of the implications for that site in view of that site’s conservation objectives. This document is a record of the Habitats Regulation Assessment of the Sites Allocation Document, undertaken for South Norfolk Council. Additionally, proposed development at Wymondham, as described in the emerging Wymondham Area Action Plan, at Long Stratton, as described in the emerging Long Stratton Area Action Plan and proposed housing in the parish of Cringleford, guided by the emerging Cringleford Draft Neighbourhood Plan, are assessed Three groups of plans are reviewed with respect to their conclusions with respect to potential in-combination effects. These are plans for The Greater Norwich Development Partnership, Great Yarmouth Borough Council, Breckland District Council, and The Broads Authority including local development plans and the Tourism Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Rights of Way Improvement Plan 2007-2017
    Norfolk County Council at your service Rights of Way Improvement Plan 2007-2017 Foreword by Cabinet Member with responsibility for Public Rights of Way Foreword I am pleased to be able to introduce There were an estimated 3.6 billion this Rights of Way Improvement Plan leisure trips to the countryside in for Norfolk 2007 - 2017. It heralds a 2005, with the average spend per trip new era extending opportunities to being £13.38. The estimated total visit the Norfolk countryside to all of value to the rural economy was £9.4 our community. billion. The Norfolk Local Access Forum, the Broads Local Access Forum, and County I see great benefit in the Council aligning Council Officers have contributed to this its major statutory transport planning plan. Significant public involvement was documents on walking, cycling, horse- secured through a consultation campaign; riding, soft-road driving, transport planning Citizens’ Panel research, and direct and health. Again, treating statutory and approaches made to disability, elderly, permissive countryside access like public ethnic, and Sure Start groups. On 20 transport, as part of the wider transport October 2004, a public conference of network, will make opportunities for interested parties discussed both the getting out and about more useful and assessment and proposed objectives. enjoyable. Enhanced management and Norfolk County Council’s countryside awareness should result from more access work has long recognised the people getting involved and sharing breadth of benefits that the service can responsibility. Understanding of the bring. Just three examples:- scope of the Council’s work, and satisfaction with it, should be boosted as Half-an-hour’s walking a day helps to the public gets directly involved in prevent high blood pressure and planning and monitoring progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Accounting for National Nature Reserves
    Natural England Research Report NERR078 Accounting for National Nature Reserves: A Natural Capital Account of the National Nature Reserves managed by Natural England www.gov.uk/naturalACCOUNTING FOR-england NATIONAL NATURE RESERVES Natural England Research Report NERR078 Accounting for National Nature Reserves: A Natural Capital Account of the National Nature Reserves managed by Natural England Tim Sunderland1, Ruth Waters1, Dan Marsh2, Cat Hudson1 and Jane Lusardi1 Published 21st February 2019 1 Natural England 2 University of Waikato, New Zealand This report is published by Natural England under the Open Government Licence - OGLv3.0 for public sector information. You are encouraged to use, and reuse, information subject to certain conditions. For details of the licence visit Copyright. Natural England photographs are only available for non commercial purposes. If any other information such as maps or data cannot be used commercially this will be made clear within the report. ISBN 978-1-78354-518-6 © Natural England 2018 ACCOUNTING FOR NATIONAL NATURE RESERVES Project details This report should be cited as: SUNDERLAND, T., WATERS, R.D., MARSH, D. V. K., HUDSON, C., AND LUSARDI, J. (2018). Accounting for National Nature Reserves: A natural capital account of the National Nature Reserves managed by Natural England. Natural England Research Report, Number 078 Project manager Tim Sunderland Principal Specialist in Economics Horizon House Bristol BS1 5TL [email protected] Acknowledgements We would like to thank everyone who contributed to this report both within Natural England and externally. ii Natural England Research Report 078 Foreword England’s National Nature Reserves (NNRs) are the crown jewels of our natural heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan
    Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report May 2021 Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report LC- 654 Document Control Box Client South Norfolk Council Habitats Regulations Assessment Report Title Regulation 18 – HRA Report Status FINAL Filename LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Date May 2021 Author SC Reviewed ND Approved ND Photo: Female broad bodied chaser by Shutterstock Regulation 18 – HRA Report May 2021 LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of this report ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 The South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................... 3 2.1 Greater Norwich Local Plan .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................................ 3 2.3 Village Clusters ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Circular Walks East Norfolk Coast Introduction
    National Trail 20 Circular Walks East Norfolk Coast Introduction The walks in this guide are designed to make the most of the please be mindful to keep dogs under control and leave gates as natural beauty and cultural heritage of the Norfolk coast. As you find them. companions to stretch one and two of the Norfolk Coast Path (part of the England Coast Path), they are a great way to delve Equipment deeper into this historically and naturally rich area. A wonderful Depending on the weather, some sections of these walks can array of landscapes and habitats await, many of which are be muddy. Even in dry weather, a good pair of walking boots or home to rare wildlife. The architectural landscape is expansive shoes is essential for the longer routes. Norfolk’s climate is drier too. Churches dominate, rarely beaten for height and grandeur than much of the country but unfortunately we can’t guarantee among the peaceful countryside of the coastal region, but sunshine, so packing a waterproof is always a good idea. If you there’s much more to discover. are lucky enough to have the weather on your side, don’t forget From one mile to nine there’s a walk for everyone here, whether sun cream and a hat. you’ve never walked in the countryside before or you’re a Other considerations seasoned rambler. Many of these routes lend themselves well to The walks described in these pages are well signposted on the trail running too. With the Cromer ridge providing the greatest ground, and detailed downloadable maps are available for elevation of anywhere in East Anglia, it’s a great way to get fit as each at www.norfolktrails.co.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Appendix 22.14 Norfolk Vanguard Onshore Ecology Consultation Responses
    Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Appendix 22.14 Norfolk Vanguard Onshore Ecology Consultation Responses Preliminary Environmental Information Report Volume 3 Author: Royal HaskoningDHV Applicant: Norfolk Boreas Limited Document Reference: PB5640-005-2214 Date: October 2018 Photo: Ormonde Offshore Wind Farm Date Issue Remarks / Reason for Issue Author Checked Approved No. 20/07/18 01D First draft for Norfolk Boreas Limited review GC CD DT 20/09/18 01F Final for PEIR submission GC CD AD/JL Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page i Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 2 Consultation responses Norfolk Vanguard ............................................................... 1 3 References ........................................................................................................... 27 Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page ii Tables Table 2.1 Norfolk Vanguard Consultation Responses 2 Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page iii Glossary of Acronyms CoCP Code of Construction Practice DCO Development Consent Order EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ES Environmental Statement ETG Expert Topic Group HVAC High Voltage Alternating Current HVDC High Voltage Direct Current PEIR Preliminary Environmental Information Report SoS Secretary of State Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page iv This page is intentionally blank. Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page v 1 Introduction 1. Consultation is a key driver of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process, and throughout the lifecycle of the project, from the initial stages through to consent and post-consent. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Improvement Plan Norfolk Valley Fens
    Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 Sites (IPENS) Planning for the Future Site Improvement Plan Norfolk Valley Fens Site Improvement Plans (SIPs) have been developed for each Natura 2000 site in England as part of the Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 sites (IPENS). Natura 2000 sites is the combined term for sites designated as Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Special Protected Areas (SPA). This work has been financially supported by LIFE, a financial instrument of the European Community. The plan provides a high level overview of the issues (both current and predicted) affecting the condition of the Natura 2000 features on the site(s) and outlines the priority measures required to improve the condition of the features. It does not cover issues where remedial actions are already in place or ongoing management activities which are required for maintenance. The SIP consists of three parts: a Summary table, which sets out the priority Issues and Measures; a detailed Actions table, which sets out who needs to do what, when and how much it is estimated to cost; and a set of tables containing contextual information and links. Once this current programme ends, it is anticipated that Natural England and others, working with landowners and managers, will all play a role in delivering the priority measures to improve the condition of the features on these sites. The SIPs are based on Natural England's current evidence and knowledge. The SIPs are not legal documents, they are live documents that will be updated to reflect changes in our evidence/knowledge and as actions get underway.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Action Plan
    BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN April 2018 BROADS IDB – BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN Front cover images (L-R) Marsh Harrier ©Artur Rydzewski; Norfolk Hawker © Milo Bostock; Water Soldier; Water Vole; Berney Marshes ©Mike Page; BIDB Digger BROADS IDB – BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN FOREWORD This Biodiversity Action Plan (Second Edition) has been prepared by the Broads Internal Drainage Board in accordance with the commitment in the Implementation Plan of the DEFRA Internal Drainage Board Review for IDB’s, to produce their own Biodiversity Action Plans by April 2010. As such, the original version was published in January 2010. This revised version aims to continue to align the Broads IDB with biodiversity policy and more specifically, the Biodiversity document for England, “Biodiversity 2020: A strategy for Englands’ Wildlife and Ecosystem Services” and build on the Government’s 25 Year Environmental Plan; A Green Future. In doing so, the document strives to demonstrate the Board’s commitment to fulfilling its duty as a public body under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006 to conserve biodiversity. Many of the Board’s activities have benefits and opportunities for biodiversity, not least its water level management and watercourse maintenance work. It is hoped that this Biodiversity Action Plan will help the Board to maximise the biodiversity benefits from its activities and demonstrate its contribution to the targets as part of the Biodiversity 2020 strategy and achieve wider environmental improvement within its catchments. The Board has adopted the Biodiversity Action Plan as one of its policies and subject to available resources is committed to its implementation. It will review the plan periodically and update it as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment: Draft Scoping Report
    North Norfolk 2016 - 2036 HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT Draft Scoping Report May 2017 North Norfolk District Council Planning Policy Team Telephone: 01263 516318 E-Mail: [email protected] Write to: Planning Policy Manager, North Norfolk District Council, Holt Road, Cromer, NR27 9EN www.north-norfolk.gov.uk/localplan All documents can be made available in Braille, audio, large print or in other languages. Please contact 01263 516318 to discuss your requirements. Draft HRA Scoping - North Norfolk District Council – Emerging Local Plan Executive Summary Habitats Regulations Assessment is required in accordance with the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, (amended 2012); in order to ensure that plans and projects do not have a likely significant effect on any European designated sites for nature conservation. Such plans or projects can only proceed if the competent authority is convinced they will not have an “adverse effect on the integrity of a European site”. Where there is uncertainty over the effects then the competent authority will need to demonstrate how these can be avoided and what mitigation can be put in place. A Local Plan is the subject of Habitats Regulations Assessment, which is the responsibility of the plan-making body (in this case North Norfolk District Council) to produce. This scoping report provides the background and review of evidence to support the commencement of screening and the final Habitats Regulations Assessment of the North Norfolk Core Strategy and Site Allocations documents. This report considers: • The European designated sites within and outside the plan area affected. • The characteristics of these sites and their conservation objectives.
    [Show full text]