DOCSLIB.ORG

An Exploration of Pedagogical Citizenship. (2010) Directed by H

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Exploration of Pedagogical Citizenship. (2010) Directed by H GRIGGS, CHARLES BRADFORD, Ph.D. Positive Freedom: An Exploration of Pedagogical Citizenship. (2010) Directed By H. Svi Shapiro. 216pp. The purpose of this dissertation is to explore the pedagogical attempt to teach for citizenship in the public school setting. Using the tools of critical/ liberatory pedagogy the critical scholar embarked on a discovery of the foundations of his pedagogical practice, by exploring his subject stance while teaching with a democratic mindset. This dissertation proposes that there is a crisis of democratic citizenship in this country. The crisis is due to forces of oppression and is exacerbated by the lack of democratic practice in schools and society. By uncovering the techniques inherent in critical pedagogy and the free school movement the dissertation seeks to place the subject/ researcher within the mental context of liberation while engaged in a systematic autobiographical record of his teaching practices. From this autobiographic stance the researcher will reflect upon his own teaching and understandings as they are presented. The findings indicate that liberatory/ critical pedagogy is a difficult practice and creates tensions within the authoritarian bodies that control schooling. The research also suggests that democracy is only an abstract concept in schooling and cannot be practiced in traditional public school settings. The original premise of the research, that there is a “crisis of democratic citizenship” and part of that crisis is due to the lack of practice in schools, is advanced by this dissertation. POSITIVE FREEDOM: AN EXPLORATION OF PEDAGOGICAL CITIZENSHIP by Charles Bradford Griggs A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Greensboro 2010 Approved by ____________________________________ Committee Chair APPROVAL PAGE This dissertation has been approved by the following committee of the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. Committee Chair __________________________________ Committee Members __________________________________ __________________________________ __________________________________ ____________________________ Date of Acceptance by Committee ____________________________ Date of Final Oral Examination ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………... 1 II. CRITICAL PEDAGOGY…………………………………………………... 34 III. FREE SCHOOL TEACHING……………………………………………… 67 IV. AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL REFLECTIVE PROCESS…………………….... 99 V. CONCLUSION……………………………………………………………. 178 REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………....... 195 APPENDIX A. METHODOLOGY………………………………………………….. 201 iii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION There is a prominent educational tradition in the United States in which the future of secondary education is premised on the recognition that in order for freedom to flourish in the worldly space of the public realm, citizens had to be educated for the task of self-government. Education in this context was linked to public life through democratic values such as equality, justice, and freedom, rather than as an adjunct of the corporation whose knowledge and values were defined largely through the prism of commercial interests (Giroux, 2003, p. 5-6). Every man and every body of men on earth possess the right of self government (Jefferson, 1790). …a teacher in search of his/her own freedom may be the only kind of teacher who can arouse young persons to go in search of their own (Greene, 1988, p. 14). When I think of democracy, I think of open spaces, ideas flying back and forth carried by the winds of conversation and debate. When I think of democracy, I think of multiple faces all different colors all singing different tunes with the same chorus. When I think of democracy, I hear the bell tolls of heroes whose voices ring across the dawning age. When I think of democracy, I think of invention and sacrifice for the greater good. When I think of democracy, I see people communing with agreed principles called laws. When I think of democracy, I see a work of art. When I think of democracy…..(untitled, Griggs, 2009). When I was a child I had this dynamic view of democracy and the United States. The view was vast and free, like an unending landscape or the shores of an endless ocean. I saw all that possibility, all that talent just waiting, yearning to be freed. The freedom that encased the idea of democracy in my mind was powerful, it was not defeatable; it was everything and everyone. The vision that I had allowed for no subordinates; it was 1 equality. I saw our founding fathers, farmers and merchants, just trying to make a living and, in doing so, stumbling on a government, that provided much more than a space to make a living. It provided a space for all the contrasting pictures. I saw no divisions, pain, hate, or suffering, just love and acceptance of everyone and everything. This naive view of our culture does not ring true, but in my mind I cannot seem to give it up. I cannot remove the picture in my mind of the statue of liberty rising over our shores and beckoning everyone, to come for any reason, to take part in our democratic experiment. This cultural view fuels the fire of what could be, in my mind. From this perspective I refuse to give up the idea of functioning democracy. I feel that as a society we can move closer to this vision if we embrace the ability of the human mind to learn, converse, and love. I came to teaching to further this goal, to entice this proposition that democracy can be practiced on a practical scale. There are in existence many philosophies and constructs that are acceptable to such an expansion. The two that I have chosen to explore within the bounds of my teaching and learning are Liberatory Pedagogy and the Democratic Schools Movement. In doing so I would like to understand the democratic space, subjecthood and the tension these ideas create if practiced by myself and others in a public school setting. In essence, I would like to facilitate pedagogical citizenship. CONCERN There are several major factors that have influenced the democratic culture negatively, especially within schools but also within society. Three of these factors that warrant notice are consumerism, militarism and the privatization of public space. These 2 factors have limited the subjectivity of citizens and curtailed the application of democracy thereby producing a sublime pressure on the practice of education. The influence of these ideas provides the contextual demand for an investigation into schools as a nexus of the clash between these negative factors and democratic culture. This contextual demand crystallized interest in exploring the topic of liberatory pedagogy and the free school movement as a means of equalizing or combating this assault on freedom and citizenship happening within the confines of a supposed democratic institution and culture. Consumerism One of the greatest assaults on democratic culture comes from the subtle process of taught consumerism. It has come to my attention over the last few years that school children have not been taught the process of citizenship; instead in its place, they have been exposed mainly to the ideas of themselves as consumers (Giroux, 2003; DeGraff, 2005). Within this structure, students are overwhelmed with the idea of “invidious comparison”; they are constantly being compared to each other. This tactic advances the cause of consumerism and makes the students wary of each other’s advances and successes. The powers of the marketplace have become the standard of education. Consumerism is constantly being used as a tacit guide to move the students where they should be going. Statements such as: “If you want to get a good job…..”, “Don’t you want to be able to drive a car like that?”, “You better finish your homework, or do well on this test so you can get into a good college, and get a great job.” All these statements lead a student to believe that an individual’s worth is based on what he/ she 3 can purchase/ consume. The repetition presupposes; that there are only so many good jobs to go around, just like there are only so many fast cars and that if a person doesn’t get the best job and the fastest car, then that person’s worth will be less than someone who does. This type of thinking, however, is extremely dangerous. It does not allow the student to see into their own creativity; they simply do not have time because they are constantly in invidious comparison with each other. Bell curve The grading system based on the bell curve is another example of how teachers have to make market-based type comparisons of students. The very idea of the curve tends to create itself, because, if everyone became proficient at a standard then the standard, would be changed to create the bell curve again. All these comparisons teach the students that they individually are everything and there is no “we” only “I” and this “I” is always in competition with other “I’s”. Patriotic Consumer Built into this notion of the citizen is the cast of the consumer. “The invitation to the public was to view consumption not just as a matter of private expenditure, self- styling and gratification, but as an act of political identification through which the ‘patriotic’ consumer signals support for the Western way of life” (Soper, 2008, p. 568). Casting ourselves and our students as consumers/ citizens we make a political statement about how we as a society are supposed to function. Therefore this whole premise promotes neoliberalism as a function of the school system. “Most generally neoliberalism is a philosophy viewing market exchange as a guide for all human action. 4 Redefining social and ethical life in accordance with economic criterion and expectations, neoliberalism holds that human freedom is best achieved through the operation of the markets” (Dean, 2008, p.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Education Revolution DOUBLE ISSUE
    The Magazine of Alternative Education Education Revolution DOUBLE ISSUE I s s u e N u m b e r T h i r t y S e v e n SUMMER 2003 $4.95 USA/5.95 CDN SAY NO TO HIGH STAKES TESTING FOR KIDS Don’t Miss the IDEC! DETAILS INSIDE! w w w . e d u c a t i o n r e v o l u t i o n . o r g Education Revolution The Magazine of Alternative Educatuion Summer 2003 - Issue Number Thirty Seven - www.educationrevolution.org News What’s an IDEC? The mission of The Education Revolution magazine is based Dana Bennis................................................ 6 on that of the Alternative Education Resource Organization A Harsh Agenda (AERO): “Building the critical mass for the education Paul Wellstone..............................................7 revolution by providing resources which support self- It’s Happening All Over The World............... 7 determination in learning and the natural genius in everyone.” Towards this end, this magazine includes the latest news and David Gribble communications regarding the broad spectrum of educational alternatives: public alternatives, independent and private Being There alternatives, home education, international alternatives, and On the Bounce…………..........................9 more. The common feature in all these educational options is Street Kids……………….........................11 that they are learner-centered, focused on the interest of the child rather than on an arbitrary curriculum. Mail & Communication AERO, which produces this magazine quarterly, is firmly Main Section…………………………....... 15 established as a leader in the field of educational alternatives. News of Schools…………………………. 19 Founded in 1989 in an effort to promote learner-centered High Stakes Testing……………………..
    [Show full text]
  • Unschooling and Social Justice/Multicultural Education: (Un)Realized Potential Kristan Morrison Radford University, US
    Other Education: The Journal of Educational Alternatives ISSN 2049-2162 Volume 7(2018), Issue 2 · pp. 97-117 Unschooling and Social Justice/Multicultural Education: (Un)Realized Potential Kristan Morrison Radford University, US. Abstract An online survey of unschooling families (student-directed form of homeschooling) sought to discover whether and how unschooled children experience a social justice curriculum (one that seeks equity between cultures, ethnicities, genders, classes, and sexualities). The 2016 survey asked about unschooled children’s relationships with/recognition of people different from themselves, their degree of critical analysis of systems and institutions in society which created, maintain, and perpetuate inequities, and whether they had opportunities to envision and work for a just and equitable society. The philosophical tenets of unschooling complicate this query, and are explored. Findings illustrate that unschooling’s educational philosophy of “curriculum-as- lived” (as opposed to “curriculum-as-plan”) (Aoki, 2004) has the potential (though not realized by all unschooling families) to provide a unique approach to social justice/multicultural education, allowing unschooled children to learn about minoritized cultures, systems that led to the minoritization, and the possibilities and pathways to a more equitable society. Keywords unschooling, multicultural education, social justice, student-directed learning, homeschooling Introduction Unschooling defined Student-directed learning in the home, termed unschooling (Farenga, 1999), is a form of education in which parents eschew a formal or standardized curriculum and instead allow their children curricular freedom. In unschooling, “the learner’s freedom and autonomy [is] limited as little as possible, ...learning always starts with the individual’s needs, goals, and desires, and not with any supposed body of knowledge or societal demands” (Miller, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 ISETL Conference Proceedings
    The Thirty-Ninth Annual Conference of the International Society for Exploring Teaching and Learning (ISETL) October 8-10, 2009 Philadelphia, PA Proceedings ISETL is dedicated to the study of instruction and principles of learning in order to implement practical, effective methods of teaching and learning; promote the application, development and evaluation of such methods; and foster the scholarship of teaching and learning among practicing post-secondary educators. Edited by Susan E. Copeland Clayton State University Copyright 2009 by the International Society for Exploring Teaching & Learning 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Angela Humphrey Brown, President, Piedmont College Peter E. Doolittle, President, Past President, Virginia Tech Susan E. Copeland, Clayton State University Jill L, Lane, Clayton State University Jerry W. Samples, University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown CORPORATE MEMBERS Diane Aschenbrenner, Johns-Hopkins University Miriam Diaz-Gilbert, University of the Sciences in Philadelphia Mominka Fileva, Davenport University Jill L. Lane, Clayton State University Mary Mattson, Georgia Perimeter College Julie Schrock, Meredith College Christina P. Shorall, Carlow University Marilyn Simon, University of Cincinnati OFFICERS Angela Humphrey Brown, President, Piedmont College Bruce Saulnier, Treasurer, Quinnipiac University Christina P. Shorall, Secretary, Carlow University DISTINGUISHED FELLOWS OF THE SOCIETY Samuel Postlethwait, Professor Emeritus, Purdue University Joseph E. J. Habowsky, Professor Emeritus, University of Windsor Charles Wales, West Virginian University Kenneth Klopfenstein, Colorado State University Jean E. Wold, California State University Donald Borchardt, Rutgers University Robert A. Stager, University of Windsor A. Jeanne Miller, University of Central Florida Eunice L. Krinsky, California State University – Dominguez Hills Anne H. Nardi, West Virginia University Bruce Saulnier, Quinnipiac University Jerry W. Samples, University of Pittsburgh – Johnstown Susan E.
    [Show full text]
  • AERO 26 Copy
    Formerly AERO-gramme With special CHANGING SCHOOLS section The Magazine of the Alternative Education Resource Organization 417 Roslyn Rd., Roslyn Heights, NY 11577 ISSN # 10679219 phone: 516-621-2195 or 800-769-4171 fax: 516-625-3257 e-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.edrev.org Winter 1999 #26 DOUBLE ISSUE With this double issue we celebrate the beginning of AERO's tenth year with a name change for our magazine. Our publication has made a gradual transformation from an letter to friends, to a newsletter, an in-house magazine, and now to a magazine with a more general audience. With our incorporation of Changing Schools into AERO-Gramme, we began to run longer and more in-depth articles. Finally, we have decided to rename AERO-Gramme with the name of our two radio shows, the Education Revolution, reflecting our mission, and the reality of the changes for which we hopes to be both a reporter and catalyst. HOMESCHOOL RESOURCE CENTERS, LEARNING CENTERS Within the next 20 years community learning centers will become increasingly important as educational sources, often replacing what we now refer to as "schools." We now see the beginnings of this movement. Almost every day, AERO is contacted by people who are interested in starting such a center, or for whom this is an answer. AERO is developing a kind of kit for people who want to start such programs. This issue features three of these cutting edge centers: Puget Sound Community School and Clearwater School, in Seattle, and Pathfinder Learning Center, in Amherst, MA.
    [Show full text]
  • INSIDE an Appeal to Texas Legislature: End the Tyranny of Standardized Testing! L Education in the News Has Pioneering a Future? by A.S
    The Magazine of Alternative Education EEducationE RRevolutionR Volume 19, Number 2 EESummer 2007 * $4.95 / $5.95 CDN RR Issue Number Forty Nine Rocket Day at Marietta Johnson School of Organic Education (see page 10) INSIDE An Appeal to Texas Legislature: End the Tyranny of Standardized Testing! l Education in the News Has Pioneering a Future? by A.S. Neill Marietta Johnson School of Organic Education Being There l From the Editor’s Desk l Plus Much More! Education Revolution The Magazine of Alternative Education Summer 2007 - Issue Number Forty Nine - www.educationrevolution.org Alternative Education Resource Organization (AERO) The Mission of Education Revolution Magazine is based on AERO, which produces this magazine quarterly, is firmly that of the Alternative Education Resource Organization (AERO): established as a leader in the field of educational alternatives. Founded in 1989 in an effort to promote learner-centered “Building the critical mass for the education revolution by education and influence change in the education system, AERO providing resources which support self-determination in is an arm of the School of Living, a non-profit organization. learning and the natural genius in everyone.” AERO provides information, resources and guidance to students, parents, schools and organizations regarding their educational Towards this end, this magazine includes the latest news and choices. communications regarding the broad spectrum of educational alternatives: public alternatives, independent and private alternatives, home education, international alternatives, and more. The common feature in all these educational options is that they are learner-centered, focused on the interest of the child rather From the Editor’s Desk than on an arbitrary curriculum.
    [Show full text]
  • AERO-Gramme from Jerry
    AERO-GRAMME #3 The Alternative Education Resource Organization Newsletter 417 Roslyn Rd., Roslyn Heights, NY 11577 516 621-2195 April, l990 This is the fifth newsletter that I have put out since September, and the third AERO-GRAMME. It was born of a need for interaction with people I had met all around the United States and in other countries, not long after I had resigned as Executive Director and National Coordinator of the National Coalition of Alternative Community Schools. Specifically, I needed help from people to match the grant from the Bay Foundation for the Kee Way Win Project, to help the tribe start a school on their ancestral land where there had been no school before. You, my friends, came through. The grant was matched, through cash donations, material and supplies. I went to Kee Way Way, and they have started a school. I hope to go again. I left the NCACS for a combination of political and personal reasons, yet I am still a member, and continue to help the people that I trained at their national office in Tennessee. I went to the Eastern Regional Caucus at the Free School in Albany, and I plan to go to the national conference near Washington this week. The NCACS still has some serious internal problems to wrestle with, and I will help to the extent that is seems mutually useful. But I think it is good that I now do the work that I am doing independently. So what is AERO-GRAMME? Everyone on the mailing list is a person or group that I know personally, at least through mail or phone, with those I have met on the Prodigy Network falling between the two.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 IDEC Report Bhubaneshwar, India
    A Report on the 11th International Democratic Education Conference December 3-12, 2004 Bhubaneshwar, Orissa India Sponsored by: IDEC SchoolScape UNICEF John Harris Loflin The Democratic Education Consortium Indianapolis, Indiana United States of America © 2004 [email protected] “Politics is the art of preventing people from taking part in affairs that properly concern them.” Paul Valery Contents Page 1 Introduction Page 2 IDEC 2004: Shanti in Education Israel: Democratic Education Page 4 India Democratic programs with (not for) working and street children The Concerned for Working Children Page 6 Don Bosco Ashalayam: A movement with children in need of care and protection The Butterflies Organization Montessori done the Indian way Page 7 New Zealand: The Tamariki Democratic School England: The Sands School Brazil: Lumiar School: Where students can be responsible in a democratic space Page 8 Germany: Berlin’s “Sudbury Valley” Japan: School Refusers Page 9 South Korea: Alternative schools of choice Page 10 Australia The Booroobin School: Democracy’s finishing school Currambera: Learning as a natural process Page 11 The United States New York Albany Free School: School democracy on call at any time California Gloval Village School: A global school for peace and diversity Indiana A Learner’s Bill of Rights: Preserving curiosity Page 12 Colorado Lowerarchy: Democracy as a challenge to hierarchy Page 14 Summary IDEC 2004: Children’s Participation Page 15 IDEC 2005 Works Cited “Adults, why do you fear children’s participation?” CWC Annual Report 2003 The Democratic Education Consortium would like to thank the following individuals and groups for their support in attending IDEC 2004: The Peace Learning Center, Dean Murtadha of the School of Education at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, The Indianapolis Peace and Justice Center, The Marion County Green Party, and friends and family members.
    [Show full text]
  • SKOLE: the Journal of Alternative Education, 1996. ISSN ISSN-1056-9197 PUB DATE 1996-00-00 NOTE 547P.; Photographs Will Not Reproduce Adequately
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 424 039 RC 021 116 AUTHOR Leue, Mary, Ed. TITLE SKOLE: The Journal of Alternative Education, 1996. ISSN ISSN-1056-9197 PUB DATE 1996-00-00 NOTE 547p.; Photographs will not reproduce adequately. For volume 12, see ED 399 099. AVAILABLE FROM Down-to-Earth Books, P.O. Box 163, Goshen, MA 01032; Tel: 413-628-0227 (1-year subscription, $24; 2-year subscription, $34; institutions; $28 per year). PUB TYPE Collected Works Serials (022) JOURNAL CIT SKOLE: The Journal of Alternativo. Education; v13 n1-4 1996 EDRS PRICE MF02/PC22 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Book Reviews; Childrens Writing; Compulsory Education; Conferences; *Educational Philosophy; Educational Practices; Elementary Secondary Education; *Free Schools; *Home Schooling; Interviews; *Nontraditional Education; Public Education; Small Schools ABSTRACT The four issues of "SKOLE" published in 1996 include articles about alternatives to public education, the value of free schools and home-schooling, and children's learning experiences. Feature articles include profiles of alternative schools and educational programs; descriptions of learning experiences and teaching practices; a study of full inclusion; discussions of the renewal of education and culture, the power of nonviolence, and Japanese education; suggestions on child rearing; a history of how the current system of compulsory "factory schooling" came about; criticism of the growing use of Ritalin and other drugs with children; interviews with educators and social scientists; and descriptions of three alternative education conferences. Two of the journal issues are devoted to children's poems, writings, and artwo:7k produced by students at free schools and other small alternative schools. Also included al:e reviews of books, movies, magazines, and audiotapes; commentaries; and photographs.
    [Show full text]
  • Unschooling, Then and Now
    Journal of Unschooling and Alternative Learning 2013 Vol. 7 Issue 14. Unschooling, Then and Now By: Kellie ROLSTAD & Kathleen KESSON Abstract While the accountability and standardization movement continues to narrow curriculum in the US, unschooling families are redefining learning and recreating community in an atmosphere of love and trust. As professors of education and unschooling mothers, Rolstad and Kesson compare their unschooling experiences in two different eras, one in the early days of unschooling (1980s), and the other in the first decade of the 21st century. Kathleen Kesson was an unschooling pioneer when her children were unschooled in the early 1980s, and her children are now adults. She describes what it was like to unschool then, to do what she terms ‘old school unschooling.’ Only a generation later, Kellie Rolstad began unschooling her three children, in a world transformed by the Internet and ease of access to both information and social networking, key components of unschooling today. Rolstad describes how her unschooling children connected play in real and virtual worlds, exploring ideas differently in many aspects from how Kesson’s children played and explored, and yet fundamentally and remarkably the same. In this article, Rolstad and Kesson share their experiences of trusting children, of giving them the space and the resources to learn and grow in the ways that are best for them, comparing along the way what it was like to unschool then and what it is like to unschool now, in this era when our society has come to distrust children more than ever. ISSN:1916-8128 Journal of Unschooling and Alternative Learning 2013 Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Desegregation and Educational Reform in Albany’S Schools
    University at Albany, State University of New York Scholars Archive History Honors Program History 2019 A Good Education for All? Desegregation and Educational Reform in Albany’s Schools Joshua Levine University at Albany, State University of New York Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/history_honors Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Levine, Joshua, "A Good Education for All? Desegregation and Educational Reform in Albany’s Schools" (2019). History Honors Program. 15. https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/history_honors/15 This Undergraduate Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the History at Scholars Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Honors Program by an authorized administrator of Scholars Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 A Good Education for All? Desegregation and Educational Reform in Albany’s Schools Joshua Levine An honors thesis presented to the Department of History, University at Albany, State University of New York in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with Honors in History Advisors: Professor Richard F. Hamm & Professor Mitch Aso May 10, 2019 2 Abstract Public and private schools throughout American history have been segregated due to policies crafted and implemented by local school boards. The Supreme Court decision in the Brown v. Board of Education case said segregated public schools were inherently flawed and that the idea of separate-but-equal had no place in public education. But how were school boards to integrate the schools? Cities such as Albany had neighborhoods that had a majority black proportion, meaning that the schools within these neighborhoods were going to be segregated.
    [Show full text]
  • Alicia Richard Master's Thesis
    What Happened to the Free Schools?: The Free Schools Movement in the United States 1967-1972 Alicia Richard A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Education University of Washington 2021 Committee: Nancy Beadie Tomas de Rezende Rocha Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Education ©Copyright 2021 Alicia Richard University of Washington Abstract What Happened to the Free Schools?: The Free Schools Movement in the United States 1967-1972 Alicia Richard Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Nancy Beadie College of Education: Educational Foundations, Leadership & Policy What happened to the Free Schools movement in the United States, and why has it been so little examined by historians of education? What legacies were left by these bold experiments in education? The Free Schools movement was a grassroots educational movement involving hundreds of small schools throughout the United States and Canada during the late 1960s and early 1970s. The key inspirational educational figures of the movement were A.S. Neill, George Dennison, John Holt and Jonathan Kozol, all of whom promoted more freedom for students and more humane practices in education. The primary newsletter of the movement, The New Schools Exchange, provides a first-hand glimpse into what was happening on the ground. This thesis shows that the free schools encountered a wide variety of practical obstacles to success which the majority could not overcome. Philosophical differences also splintered the movement and prohibited them from developing a united front to promote their educational alternatives. Only a small handful of free schools were able to become sustainable over the long haul, including two schools that are still active— Albany Free School and Sudbury Valley School.
    [Show full text]
  • The Morning Meeting: Fostering a Participatory Democracy Begins with Youth in Public Education
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Teaching & Learning Faculty Publications Teaching & Learning 2020 The Morning Meeting: Fostering a Participatory Democracy Begins with Youth in Public Education Rebecca C. Tilhou Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/teachinglearning_fac_pubs Part of the Curriculum and Social Inquiry Commons, Educational Leadership Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Political Theory Commons, and the Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education Commons Original Publication Citation Tilhou, R. C. (2020). The morning meeting: Fostering a participatory democracy begins with youth in public education. Democracy & Education, 28(2), 1-11. Retrieved from https://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol28/iss2/5/ This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Teaching & Learning at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Teaching & Learning Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Morning Meeting Fostering a Participatory Democracy Begins with Youth in Public Education Rebecca C. Tilhou (Old Dominion University) Abstract There is a faltering sense of democracy in America’s current political climate due to polarized opin- ions about leadership’s decisions and antagonistic political parties. John Dewey (1916) proposed that education is the place to foster democracy, as schools can provide a platform to actively engage stu- dents in authentic democratic experiences that will empower them to act democratically beyond the walls of the school. The democratic schools that emerged during the Free School Movement of the 1960s and 1970s embody Dewey’s philosophy, specifically with the shared governance occurring in their School Meetings.
    [Show full text]