56 Ingham Brack President G

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

56 Ingham Brack President G REVIEws Anti-Corn Law League in the This book is twenty-first century Liberal and But there is a very able article 1840s to the Institute of Eco- Liberal Democrat practice, and on ‘Nonconformity’ (by Keith nomic Affairs, the Rowntree not only a one of the differences between Robbins), which goes a long Trust and the Tawney Society Liberal and Thatcherite concep- way towards addressing the in the twentieth century. goldmine as tions of freedom, as Conrad Liberal approach in these mat- This book is not only a gold- a reference Russell stressed in his An Intel- ters. For, as Robbins points out, mine as a reference work, but ligent Person’s Guide to Liberalism ‘“Nonconformity”, in any era, also a pleasure to read. Many work, but (London: Gerald Duckworth presents itself in opposition to entries are authored by leading & Co Ltd, 1999, p. 66). Indeed, a prevailing “Establishment”’ specialists in the field – such as also a pleas- participatory citizenship was an (p. 304), whether religious, eco- Jon Parry on ‘Lord John Rus- important component of Lord nomic or political. This comes sell’ and John A. Thompson on ure to read. Russell’s strategy regarding ‘the together with the maxim that ‘Woodrow Wilson’ – and all use and dispersal of power’, as ‘whatever was morally wrong are stimulating and sometimes Duncan Brack shows in his Dic- [can]not be politically right’ controversial in a thought- tionary entry on the late Liberal (p.305) – a maxim certainly provoking and challenging Democrat peer: for, ultimately, difficult to interpret, and yet way. ‘Hobhouse’ and ‘Rawls’ there can be no security from essential to the integrity and the – spanning, between them, state oppression in the private coherence of British Liberalism twentieth-century Anglo- sphere without citizens’ active since Gladstone. American thought on justice involvement in, and control I can recommend this book and liberty – are discussed over, the running of the state. wholeheartedly to readers of by David Howarth, a scholar Unfortunately there is no this Journal. and a Liberal Democrat MP. entry on ‘Citizenship’. Neither He examines clearly both the is there one on ‘Religion’ – Dr Eugenio F. Biagini is Reviews established and classical priori- although the latter must be a Editor of the Journal of Liberal ties of liberalism, and some of major concern for the friends of History and a Fellow of Robinson its present-day concerns (such liberty in the present century. College, Cambridge. as sectarianism, highlighted by Rawls’ concept of ‘public reason’, which excludes ‘the use in politics of references to holy texts and religious reasons that Things that never happened not all participants in the debate would recognise as authorita- Duncan Brack (ed.), President Gore … and other things that tive. [Rawls] wanted political never happened (London: Politico’s Publishing, 2006) actors to confine themselves to reasons that could count as Reviewed by Robert Ingham reasons for all participants in the debate’, p. 339). The entry on ‘Freedom’ ounterfactual history at each of these key points both is penned by Ralf Dahren- – the study of ‘what ifs?’ of individual choices and of dorf (himself the subject of an C– is fun; but does it tell us broader socio-economic forces.’ elegant entry by Julie Smith), anything about the individual In seeking to explain why and is an incisive treatment of decisions and choices, and wider things turned out as they did, a highly complex subject in socio-economic factors, which historians consider the relative 3,600 words. However, it is shape our existence? Historians importance of different potential also a one-sided view which are divided on this question, causal factors. One aspect of this will leave many Liberal Demo- as Duncan Brack’s excellent process is to ponder the circum- crats perplexed. Dahrendorf introduction to this volume – stances in which different out- defines freedom as ‘absence of the successor to Prime Minister comes would have been likely, constraints’ (in the Hobbesian Portillo … and other things that and to think about the conse- tradition) and neglects the never happened (Politico’s, 2003) quences of such differences for ‘republican’ notion of liberty – makes clear. Unsurprisingly, the broader sweep of history. For as participatory citizenship Brack is himself convinced of example, if Frank Byers had held and civic obligation. The lat- the value of counterfactual his- his North Dorset seat in 1950 ter is not only central to British tory: ‘It can reinforce the analy- (and subsequently) might he liberal thought – from John sis of what actually happened by have been elected Liberal Leader Milton to J. S. Mill and the identifying the points at which in preference to Jo Grimond in New Liberals – but is also a vital things could have happened 1956? Would the Liberal Party dimension of twentieth and differently, and the relevance have revived under Byers, or Journal of Liberal History 56 Autumn 2007 41 REVIEws revived in the same sort of way Commissioner and winning the 1924 and thereby revived his as it did under Grimond? And Charlemagne Prize for achiev- party, although it seems a little would this have made any dif- ing ‘legendary success … in implausible to suggest that the ference to British politics in the implementing the single market bulk of the cabinet of 1914 could 1960s and beyond? programme’. R. J. Briand, writ- have returned ten years on. These sorts of questions ing about the British political There are only a handful of should always be at the back of a scene in the 1990s, cleverly sug- nineteenth-century counter- historian’s mind but is it worth gests that the real events of the factuals, but these essays are bringing such debates to the decade featured in a brilliantly amongst the best in the volume. forefront? Careful consideration counter-intuitive essay in a Tony Little tackles perhaps the of routes not taken can quickly volume entitled Prime Minister greatest ‘what if?’ in British develop into whimsical flights Blair … and other things that never politics – the failure to secure of fancy – the ‘parlour games’ happened. Mark Garnett imag- Home Rule for Ireland in 1886. dismissed by E. H. Carr. Brack ines Michael Howard becoming His account of how things argues for the policing of coun- Tory leader in 1997, using crates could have gone differently is terfactual history to ensure that of ale from Rotherham to win entirely convincing and raises its results are analytically useful. William Hague’s support. fresh questions about who was His book provides an oppor- Several authors examine to blame for an outcome the tunity to assess whether this is alternatives to the realignment ramifications of which continue achievable. of British politics which mar- to be felt well over one hundred Firstly, however, President ginalised the Liberal Party in years later. Mark Pack and Matt Gore is a highly entertaining the early decades of the twen- Cole look at the alignment of read. All of the essays are inter- tieth century. David Boyle parties in the mid-nineteenth esting and there are some excel- questions the reasons why the century. Pack takes as his start- lent jokes intermingled with the Labour Party emerged commit- ing point the very narrow vote weightier points. In discussing ted to the bureaucratic social- in the Commons in favour of what might have happened had ism of the Webbs rather than, the 1832 Reform Bill and sug- the UK joined the Common for example, the co-operative gests that the Peelites would Market in 1957, Peter Riddell movement, which would have have been in the ascendant had imagines Margaret Thatcher been more congenial to the the vote gone the other way, being dispatched to Brussels as a Liberals. His suggestion that a largely at the expense of the different outcome could have ultra-Tories. In this scenario, resulted from Beatrice Potter the Liberal Party might never marrying Joseph Chamberlain, have come into existence. Cole rather than Sidney Webb, seems suggests that the fortunes of preposterous at first but is plau- the Liberal Party would have sibly argued. Robert Waller’s been marred if Robert Peel had look at the 1903 pact between lived beyond 1850, leading to the Liberal and Labour Par- the earlier emergence of Labour ties is a succinct analysis of the – ‘seeking to preserve the eight- arguments for and against the eenth century, [Peel] had has- inevitability of Labour’s rise. tened on the twentieth’. The complex political situation Some of the chapters on for- of the early 1920s is well suited eign issues are also very strong. to counterfactual speculation Richard Grayson suggests that and Jaime Reynolds and David the premature death of the Hughes do not disappoint. Rey- moderate but popular German nolds, in arguing against the politician Gustav Stresemann inevitability of a Liberal decline, may have been a crucial moment makes some telling points about in the story of Hitler’s rise to the resilience of the established power. Helen Szamuely makes party system. His suggestion the case for Czechoslovakia that Ramsay MacDonald’s elec- initiating the Second World tion as Labour Leader in 1922 War by standing up to Hitler in was a key turning-point in the 1938, although her suggestion Liberal Party’s history deserves that this could have exposed further investigation. Hughes weaknesses in Hitler’s posi- uses fictitious diary entries and tion seems ambitious given memoirs to show how Asquith the events of 1939–40. Byron could have taken power in Criddle and John Gittings offer 42 Journal of Liberal History 56 Autumn 2007 REVIEws expert views on developments the different personalities and President professional careers independ- in French politics since the 1980s perceptions of the two party ent of their partners.) The forty and an attempt by Mao Zedong leaders.
Recommended publications
  • Society Welcomes Its New President, Ian Huddleston
    Journal of the LSNI 11 January-March 2017 Since delivering the CPD Seminar on Charity benefit statement and find it hard to articulate THELaw for the Law Society in February 2015 and demonstrate their public benefit. On So far as the Charity Tribunal is concerned Jenny Ebbage, Partner and Head of the occasion the registration application has acted there have been a number of decisions Charities Team at Edwards & Co. Solicitors, as a catalyst for a wide-ranging governance published. Many of these have arisen from writes on some recent developments. review and also an opportunity for upskilling the institution of statutory inquiries and the Over the year it has been a fast moving boards and those who work with them. From removal of charity trustees. environment for charities in Northern Ireland Friday, 3 June 2016 an updated version of the and it is important for practitioners to keep up online charity registration application form is The Court of Appeal decision in Charity to date so as to provide accurate and timely expected to go live. This is to be a more user Commission for Northern Ireland and Bangor WRITadvice to charity clients or to better inform friendly and intuitive version of the online Provident Trust and the Attorney General for THE JOURNAL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OFthemselves NORTHERN should theyIRELAND sit on a charity board. application process, with a change to the look Northern Ireland, seems to have now settled and flow and format of the questions being the question that Bangor Provident Trust was It would be impossible to cover everything ISSUE 226 January-March 2017 asked.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossing the Floor Roy Douglas a Failure of Leadership Liberal Defections 1918–29 Senator Jerry Grafstein Winston Churchill As a Liberal J
    Journal of Issue 25 / Winter 1999–2000 / £5.00 Liberal DemocratHISTORY Crossing the Floor Roy Douglas A Failure of Leadership Liberal Defections 1918–29 Senator Jerry Grafstein Winston Churchill as a Liberal J. Graham Jones A Breach in the Family Megan and Gwilym Lloyd George Nick Cott The Case of the Liberal Nationals A re-evaluation Robert Maclennan MP Breaking the Mould? The SDP Liberal Democrat History Group Issue 25: Winter 1999–2000 Journal of Liberal Democrat History Political Defections Special issue: Political Defections The Journal of Liberal Democrat History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group 3 Crossing the floor ISSN 1463-6557 Graham Lippiatt Liberal Democrat History Group Editorial The Liberal Democrat History Group promotes the discussion and research of 5 Out from under the umbrella historical topics, particularly those relating to the histories of the Liberal Democrats, Liberal Tony Little Party and the SDP. The Group organises The defection of the Liberal Unionists discussion meetings and publishes the Journal and other occasional publications. 15 Winston Churchill as a Liberal For more information, including details of publications, back issues of the Journal, tape Senator Jerry S. Grafstein records of meetings and archive and other Churchill’s career in the Liberal Party research sources, see our web site: www.dbrack.dircon.co.uk/ldhg. 18 A failure of leadership Hon President: Earl Russell. Chair: Graham Lippiatt. Roy Douglas Liberal defections 1918–29 Editorial/Correspondence Contributions to the Journal – letters, 24 Tory cuckoos in the Liberal nest? articles, and book reviews – are invited. The Journal is a refereed publication; all articles Nick Cott submitted will be reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Gladstone and the Bank of England: a Study in Mid-Victorian Finance, 1833-1866
    GLADSTONE AND THE BANK OF ENGLAND: A STUDY IN MID-VICTORIAN FINANCE, 1833-1866 Patricia Caernarv en-Smith, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2007 APPROVED: Denis Paz, Major Professor Adrian Lewis, Committee Member and Chair of the Department of History Laura Stern, Committee Member Sandra L. Terrell, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Caernarven-Smith, Patricia. Gladstone and the Bank of England: A Study in Mid- Victorian Finance, 1833-1866. Master of Arts (History), May 2007, 378 pp., 11 tables, bibliography, 275 titles. The topic of this thesis is the confrontations between William Gladstone and the Bank of England. These confrontations have remained a mystery to authors who noted them, but have generally been ignored by others. This thesis demonstrates that Gladstone’s measures taken against the Bank were reasonable, intelligent, and important for the development of nineteenth-century British government finance. To accomplish this task, this thesis refutes the opinions of three twentieth-century authors who have claimed that many of Gladstone’s measures, as well as his reading, were irrational, ridiculous, and impolitic. My primary sources include the Gladstone Diaries, with special attention to a little-used source, Volume 14, the indexes to the Diaries. The day-to-day Diaries and the indexes show how much Gladstone read about financial matters, and suggest that his actions were based to a large extent upon his reading. In addition, I have used Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates and nineteenth-century periodicals and books on banking and finance to understand the political and economic debates of the time.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 Baines Reforming the Lords
    met and half-heartedly agreed to a proposal whereby whilst all peers would remain members, there would Reports be a specific voting section and the independent peers would have a de- cisive influence. The delaying pow- ers would be reduced to six months. Reforming the Lords This had been talked out in the Evening meeting, 19 January, Commons by an unholy alliance of Michael Foot and Enoch Powell. with Vernon Bogdanor and Lord Carrington Carrington went on to look at the Lords today. The Lords currently Report by Malcolm Baines suffered from a lack of credibility which made using what powers it has impossible. Whilst it was effec- House of Lords reform proved a stimulating topic for a tive as a revising chamber, it could crowded meeting at the National Liberal Club in January. not act as a check on the Commons (and through it the executive) be- The speakers were Professor Vernon Bogdanor of Brasenose cause it had no credible basis of College, Oxford, and Lord Carrington, former Conservative membership. However, electing a Foreign Secretary and one-time leader of the Conservatives second chamber would give rise to different problems, depending on the in the House of Lords. extent of the second chamber’s pow- ers. If it had considerable powers, it Professor Bogdanor began by ment’s manifesto. In , the Lords’ would inevitably challenge the looking at the background to the delaying power was further reduced Commons on policy, leading to pa- Parliament Act, which intro- to one year. In the s, life peers ralysis of government; if too little, duced the two-year suspending were introduced and these had origi- then no quality candidates would power of the Lords (as opposed to nally worked well but more latterly apply.
    [Show full text]
  • 62 Cole Yellow Glass Ceiling
    ThE YEllow GLAss CEiliNG THE MYSTERY of THE disAppEARING LIBERAL woMEN MPS After women became he 1950 Liberal mani- in promoting women into Par- festo boasted proudly liament and government, the eligible to stand for that ‘the part played Liberal Party managed to do election to Parliament by women in the so again only two years before in 1918, the first councils of the Liberal its own disappearance in the TParty is shown by our unani- merger of 1988. The reasons woman Liberal MP mous adoption of a programme for this striking famine are in for women drawn up by women some ways a familiar story from was elected in 1921. Yet Liberals.’1 Certainly, the two the experience of other parties; only six women ever main parties at that time gave a but there is a dimension to the lower profile to women’s status causes which is distinctively Lib- sat as Liberal MPs, and as an issue, and Liberal policy eral, and which persists today. half of them won only demanding equal pay entitled the party to regard its propos- one election, half were als as, in one reviewer’s assess- Women Liberal MPs elected at by-elections, ment, ‘more Radical than the Only six women ever sat as Lib- Labour Party’s.’2 These pro- eral MPs, and they had an unu- and all but one were posals were, as the manifesto sual profile: half of them won directly related acknowledged, in part the only one election, half were result of the efforts of an almost elected at by-elections, and all to Liberal leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Churchill and the Historians
    Canadian Military History Volume 2 Issue 2 Article 20 1993 Churchill and the Historians Robert Vogel Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Vogel, Robert "Churchill and the Historians." Canadian Military History 2, 2 (1993) This Feature is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Vogel: Churchill and the Historians More seriously but not Copp's First (of which Lord Balfour so aptly fault there is a major problem with Churchill said; "I hear that he has written a the transcription of French names. big book about himself and called it Major Leon Brosseau, D Company and the 'The World Crisis."'). Apparently commander, killed in action, is everyone whoever talked to him or referred to as Lucien. Killed in the saw him in the distance has left same action is the mortar platoon Historians behind some clever entry in his commander, Captain Orieux, diary or memoirs. Consequently referred to in the book as Oriens. A Robert Vogel there exists an absolute treasure friend of this reviewer, Major Alex trove of material from which to Angers, shot through the throat, is mine endless quotations by which referred to as Alexander not as Robert Blake & Roger Louis, eds. one can prove a variety of likely Alexandre, which is his real name. Churchill: A Major Reassessment of his and not so likely interpretations of These may seem small errors.but Life in Peace and War.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: “Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament”
    Appendix: \Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament" August 8, 2017 Appendix Table of Contents • Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology • Appendix B: MP Membership in Ideological Groups • Appendix C: Rebellion on Different Types of Divisions • Appendix D: Models of Rebellion on Government Sponsored Bills Only • Appendix E: Differences in Labour Party Rebellion Following Leadership Change • Appendix F: List of Party Switchers • Appendix G: Discussion of Empirical Model Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology This Appendix describes our method for ideologically scaling British MPs using their speeches on the welfare state, which were originally produced for a separate study on welfare reform (O'Grady, 2017). We cover (i) data collection, (ii) estimation, (iii) raw results, and (iv) validity checks. The resulting scales turn out to be highly valid, and provide an excellent guide to MPs' ideologies using data that is completely separate to the voting data that forms the bulk of the evidence in our paper. A1: Collection of Speech Data Speeches come from an original collection of every speech made about issues related to welfare in the House of Commons from 1987-2007, covering the period over which the Labour party moved 1 to the center under Tony Blair, adopted and enacted policies of welfare reform, and won office at the expense of the Conservatives. Restricting the speeches to a single issue area is useful for estimating ideologies because with multiple topics there is a danger of conflating genuine extremism (a tendency to speak in extreme ways) with a tendency or requirement to talk a lot about topics that are relatively extreme to begin with (Lauderdale and Herzog, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • 67 Summer 2010
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 67 / Summer 2010 / £10.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y Liberals and the left Matthew Roberts Out of Chartism, into Liberalism Popular radicals and the Liberal Party Michael Freeden The Liberal Party and the New Liberalism John Shepherd The flight from the Liberal PartyLiberals who joined Labour, 1914–31 Matt Cole ‘An out-of-date word’ Jo Grimond and the left Peter Hellyer The Young Liberals and the left, 1965–70 Liberal Democrat History Group Liberal Leaders The latest publication from the Liberal Democrat History Group is Liberal Leaders: Leaders of the Liberal Party, SDP and Liberal Democrats since 1900. The sixty-page booklet contains concise biographies of every Liberal, Social Democrat and Liberal Democrat leader since 1900. The total of sixteen biographies stretches from Henry Campbell-Bannerman to Nick Clegg, including such figures as H. H. Asquith, David Lloyd George, Jo Grimond, David Steel, David Owen and Paddy Ashdown. Liberal Leaders is available to Journal of Liberal History subscribers for the special price of £5 (normal price £6) with free p&p. To order, please send a cheque for £5.00 (made out to ‘Liberal Democrat History Group’) to LDHG, 38 Salford Road, London SW2 4BQ. RESEARCH IN PROGRESS If you can help any of the individuals listed below with sources, contacts, or any other information — or if you know anyone who can — please pass on details to them. Details of other research projects in progress should be sent to the Editor (see page 3) for inclusion here.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ghost of Neville Chamberlain’ Guilty Men and the 1945 Election
    The journal of the Conservative History Group | Autumn 2005 | £7.50 Conservative History Journal HARSHAN KUMARASINGHAM “HOME SWEET HOME”: THE PROBLEMATIC LEADERSHIP OF ALEC DOUGLASHOME SCOTT KELLY ‘THE GHOST OF NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN’ GUILTY MEN AND THE 1945 ELECTION IAN PENDLINGHAM “PUT UP OR SHUT UP”: THE 1995 LEADERSHIP CONTEST SIR EDWARD HEATH 1916–2005 John Barnes, Ronald Porter and Helen Szamuely examine the legacy of a controversial Conservative leader Plus: Nicholas Hillman reviews The Welfare State We’re In; Mark Garnett reviews Giles Radice’s Diaries 1980–2001; Ronald Porter reviews Reggie: The Life of Reginald Maudling Contents Conservative History Journal The Conservative History Journal is published twice Contents yearly by the Conservative History Group ISSN 14798026 Editorial 1 Helen Szamuely Advertisements To advertise in the next issue A Conservative historian speaks: John Charmley 2 call Helen Szamuely on 07733 018999 Helen Szamuely Editorial/Correspondence So what are we to make of Edward Heath? 7 Contributions to the Journal – letters, articles and Helen Szamuely book reviews are invited. The Journal is a refereed publication; all articles submitted will be reviewed Heath should have got a life and never hung around the green room 9 and publication is not guaranteed. Contributions Ronald Porter should be emailed or posted to the addresses below. All articles remain copyright © their authors Edward Heath: a personal recollection and appraisal 11 John Barnes Subscriptions/Membership An annual subscription to the Conservative History “Home Sweet Home”: the problematic leadership of Alec Douglas Home 13 Group costs £15. Copies of the Journal are included Harshan Kumarasingham in the membership fee.
    [Show full text]
  • Best of Benn
    CHAPTER ONE Yout h By the age of twenty-five, Tony Benn was a Member of Parliament – the youngest MP in the House in 1950 – and a married man. Politically precocious, as you would expect of someone with two grandfathers and a father as MPs, he was also shy and somewhat naïve socially, having been brought up in a family of boys and educated in all-male institutions. In later years he reflected on the effect of these experiences on his character. Commenting on the 1950s, he described himself as a ‘middle-of-the-road’ Labour MP; but many of the concerns that came to define his later years as a radical – security vetting, internationalism, the honours system, the ‘Europe’ question (long before the UK had become a member of the then Common Market) – were being developed in his first ten years in Parliament and in articles written during 1960–63, when he was banned from the Commons, fighting the peerage case. The earliest diary entries here come from the Tony Benn journals kept during his training as a pilot. He, along with many other young recruits, was sent to Rhodesia to undergo basic flying instruction; his father and brother were both also RAF pilots. At the time of this entry Tony was nineteen. 1 The Best of Benn Tuesday 6 June 1944 I went up for over an hour and a half, during which time I finished spins and started on my final and crucial task – finding out whether I will ever be able to land an aircraft. It was not until breakfast time that I heard the great news.
    [Show full text]
  • Final List of Signers of the Declaration of Atlantic Unity, September 29, 195^
    FINAL LIST OF SIGNERS OF THE DECLARATION OF ATLANTIC UNITY, SEPTEMBER 29, 195^ FROM CANADA; Rev. J. M. Belanger, Director, School of Political, Economic & Social Sciences, University of Ottawa Percy Bengough, President, Trades and Labor Congress of Canada Georgjr Burt, Canadian Director, United Automobile Workers, C.I.O. Colonel Gordon Churchill, D.S.O., M.P. John Diefenbaker, Q.C., M.P,, Foreign Affairs Spokesman, Conservative Party Senator William D. Euler, P.C. George Ferguson, Editor, Montreal Star Mrs. M. McQ. Fergusson, Senator Charles D. Gonthier, Canadian Institute of International Affairs Senator L. M. Gouin, Chairman, Senate Foreign Affairs Committee Right Rev. Dr* Wasyl Kushner, Winnipeg Professor A.R.M. Lower, Queens University; Historian Dr. N.A.M, MacKenzie, President, University of British Columbia Senator A. N. McLean, Chairman, Senate Committee on NATO Trade Relations A. R. Mosher, President, Canadian Congress of Labour Patrick Nicholson, Political Columnist and Broadcaster Professor Frank Scott, McGill University Dr. Sidney Smith, President, University of Toronto Alistair Stewart, M.P., Manitoba, Foreign Affairs Spokesman, C.C.F. Party Willson Woodside, Foreign Editor, "Saturday Night" FROM THE UNITED STATES: Herbert Agar, Historian, author, "A Time for Greatness", etc. Elliott V. Bell, Chairman of the Executive Committee, McGraw-Hill Publishing Co. Robert Woods Bliss, former Ambassador to Argentina; former Assistant Secretary of State Chester Bowles, former Ambassador to India; former Governor of Connecticut Sevellon Brown, Editor and Publisher, Providence Journal and Evening Bulletin Harry A. Bullis, Chairman of the Board, General Mills, Inc. Ellsworth Bunker, President, American Red Cross; former Ambassador to Italy, etc. Vanevar Bush, President, Carnegie Institution of Washington Honorable James F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Rights Act: Bastion of Freedom Or Bane of Good Government?
    The Human Rights Act: Bastion of Freedom or Bane of Good Government? Rt Hon Lord Howard of Lympne CH QC PC With Edward Garnier QC MP Policy Exchange is an independent think tank whose mission is to develop and promote new policy ideas which will foster a free society based on strong communities, personal freedom, limited government, national self-confidence and an enterprise culture. Registered charity no: 1096300. Policy Exchange is committed to an evidence-based approach to policy development. We work in partnership with academics and other experts and commission major studies involving thorough empirical research of alternative policy outcomes. We believe that the policy experience of other countries offers important lessons for government in the UK. We also believe that government has much to learn from business and the voluntary sector. Trustees Daniel Finkelstein (Chairman of the Board), Richard Ehrman (Deputy Chair), Theodore Agnew, Richard Briance, Simon Brocklebank-Fowler, Robin Edwards, Virginia Fraser, Edward Heathcoat Amory, David Meller, George Robinson, Robert Rosenkranz, Andrew Sells, Tim Steel, Rachel Whetstone, Simon Wolfson. © Policy Exchange 2012 Published by Policy Exchange, Clutha House, 10 Storey’s Gate, London SW1P 3AY www.policyexchange.org.uk Printed by Heron, Dawson and Sawyer Designed by SoapBox, www.soapbox.co.uk Contents About the Authors 4 About Christopher Kingsland 6 Acknowledgements 8 1 Introduction 9 Edward Garnier 2 Kingsland Memorial Lecture – The Human Rights Act: 12 Bastion of Freedom or Bane of Good Government? Lord Howard 3 Further Reading 24 About the Authors The Rt. Hon. Lord (Michael) Howard of Lympne QC (Conservative) is a former leader of the Conservative Party, having served as a Member of Parliament in the House of Commons for nearly three decades.
    [Show full text]