DOCSLIB.ORG

Governance-06Mb.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Governance-06Mb.Pdf Governance Governance Corporate governance statement 58 Board of Directors 60 Governance framework 62 Audit Committee report 72 Nominations Committee report 76 Risk & CSR Committee reports 79 Directors’ remuneration report 82 Remuneration at a glance 84 Directors’ remuneration policy 88 Annual Report on Remuneration 97 Directors’ report 110 Independent auditors’ report 114 57 Corporate governance statement An introduction from our Chairman “ I believe that as a Board we have a wide ranging combination of diversity, skills, experience and knowledge, required to steer the Company through the next years.” Dear Shareholder, We considered several ways of protecting the Company and all our stakeholders, and by way of example decided to postpone the I am pleased to present this year’s corporate governance decision to propose a dividend until later in the year. You can read statement. As in previous years, this report should be read in more about this in the CFO’s section on page 27. conjunction with the section on how we have complied with the UK Corporate Governance Code on pages 62 to 109. Our CEO and CFO immediately agreed a temporary salary reduction of around 33%, and in addition, the Global Leadership Response to COVID-19 Team and senior leaders volunteered temporary salary reductions In dealing with the fast developing COVID-19 pandemic of up to 25%. The Non-Executive Directors and I also volunteered emergency, the Board and I ensured we took swift actions to to temporarily reduce our fees by 25%. protect the health and wellbeing of our employees and their In order to limit the spread of COVID-19 through public gatherings, families, (further information can be found on page 11), to ensure we also took the difficult decision to not allow shareholders to that we continued to deliver critical work for our customers and attend this year’s AGM in person. However, we want to ensure in doing so maintaining the strength of QinetiQ for the long-term that shareholders are able to exercise their rights to vote and to and protecting our stakeholders. ask questions on the business of the meeting. The details of how One of our first actions as a Board, was to call an additional Risk this will be facilitated are described further on page 67. & CSR Committee meeting, of which further information can be found on page 79. We used this meeting to test and confirm a strategy of necessary actions to be taken going forward. Further information of the Code can be found on www.frc.org.uk QinetiQ Group plc 58 Annual Report & Accounts 2020 Governance Purpose, Values and Strategy The Nominations Committee continues to review the skills that we need whilst always considering diversity and the need for The 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code (the Code) became independent thinking and challenge. The Committee will also effective for us from 1 April 2019. The Board and its Committees continue to review the size of the Board and confirm that it is have spent considerable time reviewing the 2018 Code to ensure appropriate with a good mix of skills, experience and knowledge our compliance. This has proved invaluable during the year in and the ability to maintain appropriate oversight of the Executive, considering our purpose and values and progressing with the including providing constructive challenge and support. delivery of our strategy, and in testing and supporting the Board’s and our Executives’ decision making, a process which is further described in the Section 172 Statement on pages 50 to 53. Culture During my time at QinetiQ, my initial very positive impressions of Understanding our Stakeholders its culture and values have been further confirmed. By spending time with the business and its people I have seen that the culture The Board continues to take account of the impact of its and values of QinetiQ; integrity, collaboration and performance decisions on all our stakeholders, as set out in the 172 Statement are clearly embedded and genuinely lived. In QinetiQ, I have on pages 50 to 53 and the examples of our Stakeholder found a culture that is grounded, responsible and humble, where engagement on pages 48 to 49 and 66 to 67. The 2018 UK people have confidence in their capabilities and our strategy, Corporate Governance Code emphasises the need for boards to and with a strong desire to learn and develop. A priority for my develop effective relationships with all stakeholders, including Chairmanship is to see that the Board continues to help sustain understanding their views. In particular, boards are encouraged and evolve this positive culture by having the right capability to ensure they find ways to hear the voice of employees. My around the table and the right engagement with stakeholders fellow Directors and I have worked extensively on our approach outside the boardroom. to these important matters, to ensure that all voices – those of shareholders, employees, customers and communities – find their way to the Boardroom. More information about how the Remuneration Board and the Company considers stakeholders, can be found on At the 2020 AGM we are bringing a new and continued robust pages 66 and 67 and a deep-dive into the interaction between the Remuneration Policy to the vote of the shareholders. Susan Board and the Group’s workforce can be found on pages 64 to 66. Searle has been working tirelessly with the Remuneration Committee over the year to develop a fair, flexible, stretching and Management Changes aligned Remuneration Policy, of which further information can be found on pages 88 to 108. It is now 13 months since I joined QinetiQ, initially as a Non- Executive Director. It has been a pleasure to get to know my new colleagues on the Board and I believe that as a Board we Conclusion have a wide ranging combination of diversity, skills, experience I would especially like to thank the CEO, his Executive team and and knowledge, required to steer the Company through the next my fellow Directors for their work during the year. QinetiQ has an years. At the AGM in July we will be saying good bye to Paul exciting future ahead and I believe that the right team is in place to Murray. Paul has made valuable contributions during his tenure take the Company forward and transition into a global business. through his leadership of the Audit Committee. In May 2020 we welcomed Shonaid Jemmet-Page to the Board. Shonaid is an experienced Non-Executive Director in the energy and financial sectors and will be taking on the role as Audit Committee Chair Neil Johnson when Paul Murray steps down in July. Non-Executive Chairman In July 2019, Michael Harper stepped down as the Chair of the Remuneration Committee, and I would like to take this opportunity to thank him for his work and dedication to this role. Michael continues to serve as the Deputy Chairman and Senior Independent Director on the Board and its Committees. Susan Searle, who has been a valuable member of the Board as a Non-executive Director since 2014, took on the responsibility as the Chair of the Remuneration Committee when Michael stepped down. In addition to her experience from the QinetiQ Board, Susan also brings to this challenging role previous and current experience as the Remuneration Committee Chair of other listed companies. 59 Board of Directors The Chairman considers all of the Directors to contribute valuably, and to continue to be paramount to the Company’s long-term sustainable success. Neil Johnson Steve Wadey David Smith Chairman Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Skills, competence and experience: Neil’s former Skills, competence and experience: Steve’s proven Skills, competence and experience: David provides CEO experience and current roles as a plc Chairman track record of driving growth, and his in-depth significant expertise to the Group from his broad and and Non-Executive Director brings to the Board experience of defence and technology industries is of comprehensive executive experience in blue-chip relevant knowledge, challenge and leadership. essential importance and benefit to the Board. companies and work in the aerospace and defence, Starting his career at Sandhurst and the Army, Neil Steve is a Fellow of the Institution of Engineering and technology, and automotive sectors. spent much of his early career in the automotive and Technology, the Royal Aeronautical Society, and the David is an Associate of the Chartered Institute engineering industries. He was worldwide Sales and Royal Academy of Engineering. He was previously of Management Accountants and a member of Marketing Director at Jaguar before being seconded Co-Chair of the UK Defence Growth Partnership, a its Advisory Panel. He was previously the CFO of to the UK Ministry of Defence to command 4th member of the Prime Minister’s Business Advisory Rolls-Royce Holdings plc, having joined as CFO of its Battalion The Royal Green Jackets. He returned to Group, Co-Chair of the National Defence Industries Aerospace Division. Prior to that, David was CFO of the industry with British Aerospace, initially running Council Research and Development Group, and a Edwards Group and CEO of Jaguar Land Rover, having Land Rover and then all of its European automotive Non-Executive Director of the UK MOD Research and previously been its CFO. He has also held a variety of operations. Neil was later CEO of the RAC, and former Development Board. Steve has held various roles roles with the Ford Motor Company. Director General of the EEF and a Home Office with MBDA, including as Managing Director, MBDA Other appointments: Motability Operations Group plc. appointed Independent Member of the Metropolitan UK. Previously he held various roles with Matra BAe Police Authority.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • British Aerospace Jetstream 3102, G-CCPW.Pdf
    AAIB Bulletin: 9/2006 G-CCPW EW/C2006/03/06 INCIDENT Aircraft Type and Registration: British Aerospace Jetstream 3102, G-CCPW No & Type of Engines: 2 Garrett AiResearch TPE331-10UGR-516H turboprop engnes Year of Manufacture: 987 Date & Time (UTC): 7 March 2006 at 905 hrs Location: Belfast Cty Arport Type of Flight: Publc Transport (Passenger) Persons on Board: Crew - 2 Passengers - 6 Injuries: Crew - None Passengers - None Nature of Damage: Damage to propellers and three runway lghts Commander’s Licence: Arlne Transport Plot’s Lcence Commander’s Age: 34 years Commander’s Flying Experience: 2,600 hours (of whch 370 were on type) Last 90 days - 110 hours Last 28 days - 40 hours Information Source: Aircraft Accident Report Form submitted by the pilot and further enqures by the AAIB Synopsis While taxiing along Runway 04 to line up on Runway 22 up, the arcraft was cleared by ATC to enter, back track the arcraft’s nose wheel left the paved surface at the and line up on Runway 22. He planned to use the turning end of the runway. Damage was caused to the aircraft’s circle at the threshold of Runway 22 to turn the aircraft propellers and three runway lights. around. Due to the weather, he was using the windscreen wipers intermittently. History of the flight The crew were operatng ther thrd sector of the day from The commander taxied the aircraft slowly down the Belfast City Airport to Ronaldsway, Isle of Man. The centre of Runway 04 towards the threshold of Runway 22 commander was the PF for this sector and taxied the and he could see contnuously the red stop-end lghts aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • The Connection
    The Connection ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. Copyright 2011: Royal Air Force Historical Society First published in the UK in 2011 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. ISBN 978-0-,010120-2-1 Printed by 3indrush 4roup 3indrush House Avenue Two Station 5ane 3itney O72. 273 1 ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY President 8arshal of the Royal Air Force Sir 8ichael Beetham 4CB CBE DFC AFC Vice-President Air 8arshal Sir Frederick Sowrey KCB CBE AFC Committee Chairman Air Vice-8arshal N B Baldwin CB CBE FRAeS Vice-Chairman 4roup Captain J D Heron OBE Secretary 4roup Captain K J Dearman 8embership Secretary Dr Jack Dunham PhD CPsychol A8RAeS Treasurer J Boyes TD CA 8embers Air Commodore 4 R Pitchfork 8BE BA FRAes 3ing Commander C Cummings *J S Cox Esq BA 8A *AV8 P Dye OBE BSc(Eng) CEng AC4I 8RAeS *4roup Captain A J Byford 8A 8A RAF *3ing Commander C Hunter 88DS RAF Editor A Publications 3ing Commander C 4 Jefford 8BE BA 8anager *Ex Officio 2 CONTENTS THE BE4INNIN4 B THE 3HITE FA8I5C by Sir 4eorge 10 3hite BEFORE AND DURIN4 THE FIRST 3OR5D 3AR by Prof 1D Duncan 4reenman THE BRISTO5 F5CIN4 SCHOO5S by Bill 8organ 2, BRISTO5ES
    [Show full text]
  • Qinetiq Group Plc – Notice of Annual General Meeting Ordinary
    This document is important and requires your immediate attention. If you are in any doubt as to the action you should take, you should immediately consult your stockbroker, solicitor, accountant or other professional advisor duly authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. If you have sold or otherwise transferred all your shares in the Company, please send this document, and the accompanying form of proxy, to the purchaser or transferee or the stockbroker, bank or other agent through whom the sale or transfer was effected for onward transmission to the purchaser or transferee. QinetiQ Group plc – Notice of Annual General Meeting NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual General Meeting of QinetiQ Group plc (the Company) will be held at the offices of Ashurst LLP, Fruit and Wool Exchange, 1 Duval Square, London E1 6PW on Wednesday 24 July 2019 at 11.00am, or at any adjournment thereof, to consider and, if thought fit, to pass the following 21 resolutions. Resolutions 1 to 16 (inclusive) will be proposed as ordinary resolutions and will be passed if more than 50% of the total votes cast are in favour of each such resolution. Resolutions 17 to 21 (inclusive) will be proposed as special resolutions and will be passed if not less than 75% of the total votes cast are in favour of each such resolution. Voting on all resolutions will be conducted by way of poll rather than a show of hands. Ordinary Resolutions Resolution 1 – Report and Accounts a) to make political donations to political parties and/or independent To receive the accounts and the reports of the Directors and the auditor election candidates not exceeding £100,000 in total; thereon for the financial year ended 31 March 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • BAE Undertakings of the Merger Between British Aerospace Plc And
    ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS BUSINESS OF THE GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANYPLC UNDERTAKINGS GIVEN TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRADE AND INDUSTRY BY BRITISH AEROSPACE PLC PURSUANT TO S75G(l) OF THE FAIR TRADING ACT 1973 WHEREAS: (a) On 27 April 1999 British Aerospace pic ("BAE SYSTEMS") agreed with The General Electric Company pic ("GEC") the proposed merger ("the merger") of GEC's defence electronics business Marconi Electronic Systems ("MES") with BAE SYSTEMS; (b) The merger came within the jurisdiction of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 4064/89 on the control of concentrations between undertakings ("the EC Merger Regulation"); (c) Article 296 (ex Article 223) of the EC Treaty permits any Member State to take such measures as it considers necessary to protect its essential security interests which are connected with the production of or trade in arms, munitions and war material; (d) BAE SYSTEMS was requested, under the former Article 223(I)(b) of the EC Treaty, not to notify the military aspects of the merger to the European Commission under the EC Merger Regulation; (e) The military aspects of the merger were consequently considered by Her Majesty's Government under national merger control law; (f) The Secretary of State has power under section 75(1) of the Fair Trading Act 1973 to make a merger reference to the Competition Commission and, under section 7SG(l), to accept undertakings as an alternative to making such a reference; (g) The Secretary of State has requested that the Director General of Fair Trading seek undertakings from BAE SYSTEMS in order to remedy or prevent the adverse effects ofthe merger.
    [Show full text]
  • Government and British Civil Aerospace 1945-64.Pdf
    Journal of Aeronautical History Paper No. 2018/04 Government and British Civil Aerospace 1945-64 Professor Keith Hayward Preface This paper is something of a trip down an academic memory lane. My first book, published in the early 1980s, carried a similar title, albeit with a longer time span. While it had the irreplaceable benefit of some first hand memories of the period, the official record was closed. A later history of the UK aircraft industry did refer in part to such material dating from the 1940s, but access to the ‘secret’ historical material of the 1950s and beyond was still blocked by the then “Thirty Year” rule. By the time the restrictions were relaxed to a “Twenty Year” rule or even more by the liberality offered by “Freedom of Information” legislation, I had moved on to the more pressing demands of analysing the world aerospace industry for the SBAC. 1 My years at the Royal Aeronautical Society afforded a bit more scope. Discovery of an archive on the formation of the British Aircraft Corporation, and published by the Royal Aeronautical Society’s Journal of Aeronautical History 2, stimulated a hankering to open more musty files on the 1950s. This led to a series of articles published in the Aviation Historian. However much this satisfied an initial hankering to look back to a critical period in UK aerospace, there were gaps to be filled in the narrative and the analysis. With the encouragement of the Editorial Board of the Journal of Aeronautical History, I have endeavoured to provide a more coherent overview of government policy towards the civil sector.
    [Show full text]
  • GKN Aerospace-A Global First Tier Provider
    GKN Aerospace-A global First Tier Provider SW Regional Development Agency & Japanese Aerospace Mission – Great Nagoya 23rd March 2010 1 Agenda Presentations • GKN Aerospace & Composite Capability • Filton • Research & Technology Initiatives Q&A, Open Discussion & Lunch Site Tour • Manufacturing • A380 FTE Assembly • Systems 2 GKN plc GKN can trace its roots directly to the origins of the industrial revolution Once the world leader in iron and steel production The business changed its focus over the last 25 years of the Dowlais Ironworks, Mid 19th Century 20th century Now a leading supplier to the world's automotive and aerospace primes Strategic focus on high growth and high technology 3 GKN: leadership in four specialist, global sectors $7616M- 2008 Revenue Automotive – sales $4032m Powder Metallurgy – sales $1019m OffHighway – sales $912m Aerospace – sales $1653m 4 GKN Global Footprint Zimbabwe Argentina USA Australia United Kingdom Austria Thailand Belgium Taiwan Brazil Switzerland Canada Sweden Czech Republic Spain Chile South Africa China Slovenia Colombia Singapore Denmark Portugal France Poland Finland Philippines Operating in over 30 countries Norway Germany Namibia 35,500 people in subsidiaries Greece Netherlands and Hong Kong Mexico joint ventures India Malaysia Republic of Ireland Korea Israel Japan Italy 5 GKN Aerospace $2.4Bn 2009 Market Business Mix Sector Customer Base 6 GKN Aerospace Organisation Integrated Aerostructures Propulsion Systems Special Products $1.6BN $500M $300M • Focussed business sector groups • Coordinated
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Family Concept for High Performance Transport Aircrafts
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICS Aircraft Family Concept for High Performance Transport Aircrafts Prasetyo Edi Boeing-MD-95-20/-30/-50, IPTN's N-2130, Fairchild Abstract— The objective of this research is to make a feasibility Dornier's 728JET and Bombardier's Canadair Regional Jet study of the aircraft family concepts using a combined Hybrid Laminar (CRJ) Series 700 programmed. Flow Control - Variable Camber Wing (HLFC-VCW) for a high Only three models of the above aircrafts are smaller than performance Advanced Technology Regional Aircraft (ATRA). The 120-seats, the Avro RJ-70/-85/-100/-115, the Fokker-70/-100 prediction of ATRA’s performance used computational fluid dynamic and empirical methods. The aircraft family concept using a combined and the Boeing 737-500/-600. The Avro RJ and the Boeing HLFC–VCW is feasible for ATRA aircraft family from aerodynamic 737 family are 6 abreast seating, while the Fokker family is 5 point of view. abreast seating. In order to increase their profit, many Aircraft Keywords— Aircraft family concept, high performance transport manufacturers , i.e. : Airbus, Boeing, McDonnell Douglas, aircraft, hybrid laminar flow control, variable camber wing, Fokker, British Aerospace, IPTN/IAe, etc., have developed aerodynamics, aircraft design, advanced technology, regional aircraft. their aircraft family based on one wing and one fuselage cross section to reduce development costs. For one fuselage cross I. INTRODUCTION section aircraft family, alternatives concepts for Regional PPROXIMATELY 65% of the world's commercial jet Airliner family are : Afleet consists of narrow-body, single-aisle aircraft with a 1. fixed wing geometry on mid-size, then direct operating cost capacity of 70 to 170 seats.
    [Show full text]
  • International Customer Approvals
    JULY 2021 International Customer Approvals This document reflects the approvals our products conform to, for which we have been made aware of. This is not a definitive list and we welcome you to contact us for further details of the specifications you are looking for. • AS9100 (Rev D) NQA Cert 50981 • BS EN ISO 9001-2015 NQA Cert 50981 • BS EN IS0 14001-2015 ISOQAR 8145 • Cage Code K3504 (UK) – Indestructible Paint Ltd • Cage Code 00B6 (USA) – Indestructible Inc. Manufacturing & MRO’s A list of some of the companies we have dealt with historically and currently, some of whom we have gained approvals from. • Airbus UK Ltd / Airbus SAS: 204492 • Honeywell – Normalair Garrett Ltd • Airbus Helicopters Deutschland • Honeywell, Phoenix Arizona PCS 5022 • Airbus Helicopters Marignane • Hychrome (Europe) Ltd • Airfoil Services OSL-006/06 • ITP, Spain E-200060-SA • Allison (RR INC) PMI 200 • IHI, Japan • British Aerospace PLC, Aircraft Group (BAE/AG/30539/2004) • Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Japan • British Aerospace PLC, Civil Aircraft, Air Weapons & Airbus • Lucas Western Divisions (BAE/2256, BAE/CHE/2006) • BAE Evaluated Supplier ACO/I/LT/JJH/3244 • Marconi Communications • Agusta-Westland Aerospace UK: V02007 (040/92/S) • Meggitt (Dunlop) Ltd – Aviation & Precision Rubbers Divisions • Agusta-Westland Spa • Meggitt Aerospace Braking Systems, Coventry • Allied Signal • Meggitt Thermal Systems • Avions Marcel Dassault • M.T.U Aeroengines • Boeing – McDonnell Douglas Helicopters • Pratt & Whitney Canada • Bombardier – Supplier Ref: 0000109995 • Pratt
    [Show full text]
  • Hawker Siddeley and British Aerospace in Kingston
    HAWKER SIDDELEY AND BRITISH AEROSPACE IN KINGSTON Export Hawk variants have been continuously developed to deliver the pilot training needed for the latest combat aircraft The initial 50 series export Hawks were similar to the RAF TMk1 but with external fuel tanks. The 60 series were more powerful and the 100 series had avionics and cockpit systems representative of 21st century fighters. The versatility of the Hawk added greatly to its value, most export Hawks fulfilled the dual role of advanced trainer and ground attack fighter. The biggest overseas customer for Hawks was the United States Navy with their standard advanced trainer, the T-45 Goshawk To satisfy the requirement for carrier operations the airframe and undercarriage were strengthened and a tail hook and catapult facility were added. Design and manufacture was shared with McDonnell-Douglas in the USA. The single seat 200 series Hawk offered customers a high performance air combat and ground attack fighter at a bargain price Hawk variants remained in production at BAe and BAE Systems for over 35 years with almost 1,000 sold to 18 countries The 1978 Hawker Siddeley/BAe Sea Harrier FRSMk1 with its nose mounted radar, raised cockpit and Sidewinder missiles was a potent fleet defence fighter retaining the Harrier’s full ground attack capability Sea Harrier returned air power to the Royal Navy who for several years had only operated helicopters. It was ideally suited to the small (15000 ton) Invincible class through-deck cruisers and came into its own during the 1982 Falkland Islands war with Argentina. Without the Harriers and their carriers it would not have been possible to defeat the invaders.
    [Show full text]
  • British Aerospace Face of Adversity
    Up Front By Antoine Gelain Contributing columnist Antoine Gelain is the managing director of Paragon European Partners. He is based in London. COMMENTARY war effort—“Work until it hurts!” exhorted the company’s chief execu- tive to its workers—it became the symbol of British resilience in the British Aerospace face of adversity. Thus, Rolls-Royce’s current troubles feel like the British A proud past but an uncertain future aerospace industry being wounded in its heart. n less than a month, Meanwhile, the part of the industry British, Irish and that does work well is the one that I builds aircraft parts but does not de- Commonwealth citizens sign them: Tens of small- and medi- living in the U.K. will vote um-size manufacturers of “build-to- to decide whether the U.K. Rolls-Royce workers assembling should remain in the cylinder blocks on the Hillington European Union or not. Merlin production line in 1942. While the stakes are high, print” aerostructure and detail parts this is really business as are today the industrial backbone of usual for the British, as this U.K. aerospace. But very few of them, June 23 “Brexit” referendum if any, design their own products. As an illustration, only one British is just the latest episode in company today—GKN—is qualified by the country’s longstanding WIKIMEDIA/FROM THE COLLECTIONS OF THE IMPERIAL WAR MUSEUMS Airbus as a tier-1 supplier of “design ambivalence toward Europe. and build” aerostructures. through a merger with EADS, which Without strong domestic design In many ways, the recent history ultimately fell through.
    [Show full text]
  • F/A-18 / AIM-132 ASRAAM Integration, Test and Clearance Program
    UNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED F/A-18 / AIM-132 ASRAAM Integration, Test and Clearance Program David A. Pierens Aircraft Stores Compatibility Engineering Agency Aerospace Operational Support Group RAAF Base EDINBURGH SA 5111 Australia [email protected] ABSTRACT In 1998 the Australia Government decided to acquire the UK AIM-132 ASRAAM as a replacement for the US AIM-9M Sidewinder currently in inventory for F/A-18 Hornet aircraft. Australian Defence Force (ADF) policy on the acquisition of new technical equipment is to perform Test and Evaluation (T&E) if an aircraft stores clearance or certification with sufficient testing has not already been carried out by recognised test agencies iaw MIL-HDBK-1763. The total T&E effort required to integrate this weapon onto the F/A-18 Hornet and introduce it into service was broken down into phases, which culminated in live firings at instrumented ranges in the US and Australia. This paper includes details of the ADF aircraft stores separation clearance process and test program undertaken by the Aerospace Operational Support Group (AOSG) that has lead to the successful weapon system integration clearance and introduction into service of the AIM-132 ASRAAM with the RAAF. The paper also contains a summary of test results and how the developing capabilities such as the Aircraft Stores Compatibility Engineering Agency (ASCENG) Weapon Separation Analysis System (WSAS) and the Defence Science and Technology Organisation (DSTO) Hazards of Electromagnetic Radiation to Ordnance (HERO) test facilities were used to minimise certification costs and provide an eventual clearance envelope second to none off the F/A-18 aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Europeantransatlanticarmscoope
    ISB?: 960-8124-26-3 © 2003 Defence Analysis Institute 17, Valtetsiou Street 10680 Athens, Greece Tel.: (210) 3632902 Fax: (210) 3632634 web-site: www.iaa.gr e-mail: [email protected] Preface Introduction The European Defence Industrial Base and ESDP RESTRUCTURING OF THE EUROPEAN DEFENCE INDUSTRY THE INDUSTRY-LED RESTRUCTURING PROCESS. 1997-1999: the European defence industry under pressure 13 Firms seek economies of scale and enlargement of the market State/industry consensus on the need for industrial consolidation From international cooperation to transnational integration 18 The first cooperative programmes, common subsidiaries and joint ventures Privatisation Concentration Groups with diversified activities Appraisal by sector of activities 27 Defence aerospace and electronics: a strategy of segment consolidation The land and naval armaments sectors: an industrial scene divided along national lines Trends in European defence industrial direct employment 37 Overview Situation by country THE OPERATING ENVIRONMENT 41 The permanence of the Europe/United States imbalance 43 Unfavourable conditions... …in the face of the American strategy of expansion in Europe First initiatives aimed at creating a favourable environment for European defence industries 48 Creation of ad hoc structures by the principal armaments producing countries (Germany, United Kingdom, France, Italy, Spain and Sweden) First steps towards an institutional strategy for the EU in the field of armaments ALL-UNION INITIATIVES, ENHANCED COOPERATION AND CONVERGENCE OBJECTIVES
    [Show full text]