DOCSLIB.ORG

Florida Rail System Plan: Policy Element

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Florida Rail System Plan: Policy Element Final Report The Florida Rail System Plan: Policy Element prepared for the Florida Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics With support from Planning Innovations, Inc Quandel Consultants March, 2009 Policy Element of the 2009 Florida Rail System Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1-1 The Vision of Rail in 2030 ............................................................................................ 1-1 The Rebirth of Railroading .......................................................................................... 1-1 The Purpose and Role of the Florida Rail System Plan ........................................... 1-2 The Rail Stakeholder Advisory Committee .............................................................. 1-4 What are the Transportation Challenges? ................................................................. 1-4 How has Florida Responded? ..................................................................................... 1-6 2.0 Overview of Florida’s Rail System ............................................................................ 2-1 Roles and Responsibilities ........................................................................................... 2-1 Freight Rail ..................................................................................................................... 2-1 Passenger Rail ................................................................................................................ 2-3 Future Needs Assessment............................................................................................ 2-4 3.0 Goals, Objectives, and Strategies ............................................................................... 3-1 Safety and Security ....................................................................................................... 3-3 Quality of Life and Environmental Stewardship ..................................................... 3-4 Maintenance and Preservation .................................................................................... 3-6 Mobility and Economic Competitiveness .................................................................. 3-7 Sustainable Investments ............................................................................................... 3-8 Goal: Safety and Security ............................................................................................ 3-9 Goal: Quality of Life and Environmental Stewardship .......................................... 3-11 Goal: Maintenance and Preservation ........................................................................ 3-13 Goal: Mobility and Economic Competitiveness ...................................................... 3-15 Goal: Sustainable Investments ................................................................................... 3-19 Appendices Appendix A: 2008 Florida Rail Stakeholder Advisory Committee Report........... A-1 Appendix B: Enabling Legislation for the Florida Rail System Plan ..................... B-1 Appendix C: Glossary and Acronym Guide ............................................................ C-1 ii Policy Element of the 2009 Florida Rail System Plan Executive Summary The 2009 Florida Rail System Plan is one of the various statewide modal planning efforts of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) conducted under the policy guidance of the 2025 Florida Transportation Plan. By law, the Florida Rail System Plan is to include an identification of priorities, programs, and funding levels required to meet statewide needs. Further, the plan must be updated every two years and cover both passenger rail service and freight rail service. Throughout the summer and fall of 2008, the Florida Rail Stakeholder Advisory Committee, which represented the public and private sector, modes of transportation, economic development, and environmental interests, and a citizen representative worked to develop consensus recommendations to the Secretary of the Florida Department of Transportation for consideration in the development of the Florida Rail System Plan. The goals, objectives, and strategies in this plan are based upon a review of trends, conditions, and social issues that will influence future investments in Florida’s rail transportation system. These include: the role of rail transportation in increasing the state’s economic competitiveness; projected increases in population and the impact of this population increase on the demand for passenger and freight rail services; ensuring the safety of the rail system in light of increasing demand for mobility; the need to enhance security of the rail system and support the critical role rail plays in emergency preparedness and response efforts; the need to maintain rail infrastructure and corridors and plan for the preservation of rights of way for future appropriate use; the physical, environmental, and financial constraints associated with adding capacity to the transportation system; the balance between adding capacity to the transportation system while supporting community livability goals such as compact growth and transit-oriented development; and, the role that rail can play in support of Florida’s environmental initiatives, including the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, increased energy efficiency, and land conservation. Chapter 1 of this plan includes a statewide vision for Florida’s rail transportation system that recognizes the vital role that passenger and freight rail will play as part of a multimodal, interconnected transportation system if Florida is to be well positioned to compete globally in the 21st century. The vision also lays the foundation for rail ES-1 Policy Element of the 2009 Florida Rail System Plan investments to support community values, improve the quality of life for Florida’s residents and visitors, and ensures the sustainability of the state’s environment and natural resources. This chapter also describes several key events that have lead to a rebirth of railroading in Florida and reviews the purpose and role of the Florida Rail System Plan. Further, the chapter describes the purpose of the Rail Stakeholder Advisory Committee and provides a summary of key societal and demographic trends that were considered by the committee in developing their recommendations for the development of this plan. Chapter 2 provides an overview description of Florida’s rail system and services and summarizes the roles and responsibilities of the Florida Department of Transportation and privately–owned rail companies to provide rail service in Florida. Chapter 3 documents the goals, objectives, and strategies of this plan which together form a policy framework for the investment of scarce state resources in our rail system in partnership with private rail interests and other public entities. This policy framework is organized around the five goals of the 2025 Florida Transportation Plan and is summarized as follows: Safety and Security: FDOT should continue to identify and support rail and rail- highway safety improvements and coordinate with appropriate partners to identify and implement security and emergency response plans; Quality of Life and Environmental Stewardship: Rail and land use planning should be integrated at the state, regional, and local levels. Further, the environmental benefits of rail should be evaluated and transportation and environmental decisions should be integrated into the statewide, regional, and local planning processes. Maintenance and Preservation: Maintenance and preservation of rail infrastructure and service and modernization of the rail system should remain a high priority. Mobility and Economic Competitiveness: Investments in Florida’s rail system should support and spur desired economic growth. Florida should invest in rail system capacity improvements to enhance the interstate and intrastate movement of people and goods when public benefit can be demonstrated, and capacity should be preserved for future needs, including the evaluation of all abandoned rail corridors for future rail use. Sustainable Investments: Public awareness of the need for state and regional investments in rail is an important component of Florida’s goal to become increasingly competitive economically and its ability to keep pace with investments in both passenger and freight rail occurring elsewhere in the nation. Opportunities for funding rail projects should be aggressively pursued in cooperation with leaders at the local, regional, state, and national levels. Specifically, o The state should capitalize on opportunities at the local, regional, and state levels to capture federal dollars for rail projects; o New and innovative revenue sources and financial tools to fund rail improvements should be identified; o Public-private partnerships should be considered when in the public interest; and, ES-2 Policy Element of the 2009 Florida Rail System Plan o Funds should be made available to rapidly respond to opportunities. The 2009 Florida Rail System Plan consists of two elements: The Policy Element: This document, the Policy Element, establishes a vision for passenger and freight rail transportation in Florida and a policy framework of goals, policies, and strategies to guide future state rail
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2.0 Current Freight Rail System and Services in Florida
    Investment Element of the 2010 Florida Rail System Plan 2.0 Current Freight Rail System and Services in Florida 2.1 Overview The Florida rail system is comprised of 2,786 miles of mainline track, which are owned by 15 operating line-haul railroads and terminal or switching companies, as well as 81 miles owned by the State of Florida. Florida’s rail system includes 2 Class I Railroads (CSX Transportation and Norfolk Southern Corporation), 1 Class II (Florida East Coast Railway), 11 Class III (Alabama and Gulf Coast Railway AN Railway, Bay Line Railroad, First Coast Railroad, Florida West Coast Railroad, Florida Central Railroad, Florida Midland Railroad, Florida Northern Railroad, Georgia and Florida Railway, Seminole Gulf Railway, and South Central Florida Express) and 1 railroad specializing in switching and terminals (Talleyrand Terminal).9 The largest operator in the State is CSX Transportation, which owns more than 53 percent of the statewide track mileage. In 2008, Florida’s railroads carried nearly 1.6 million carloads – 19 percent less than in 2006 – and approximately 83 million tons of freight, representing a 25 million ton (23 percent) decrease from 2006.10 During that year, railroads handled freight equivalent to roughly 5.0 million heavy trucks.11 Nonetheless, railroads continue to support thousands of jobs throughout the State and assist Florida’s industries to remain competitive with international and domestic markets for fertilizer, construction rock, consumer goods, paper products, processed 9 U.S. Class I Railroads are line-haul freight railroads with 2007 operating revenue in excess of $359.6 million (2006 operating revenues exceeding $346.7 million).
    [Show full text]
  • Interchange Winter 2014 CSX Transportation and America’S Short Lines: Connecting for Growth
    INTERCHANGE Winter 2014 CSX Transportation and America’s Short Lines: Connecting For Growth AWARDS AND RECOGNITION OPPORTUNITIES FOR GROWTH NEWS AND NOTES 2014 – A Year of Strong Growth At the end of May, CSX interline volumes caused congestion and network service 300 new locomotives on order, with with the short line industry were 2.5 challenges for almost all the Class I 200 being delivered throughout 2015. percent favorable to 2013, or 8,540 railroads. Working with our short line Strategic infrastructure projects aimed at carloads. At the end of October, volume partners, CSX strove to mitigate network reducing congestion and enabling future gains reached almost 24,000 carloads, service issues through focus on its growth are almost finished. or a 3.5 percent improvement. interchange service at short line interchanges. This effort will continue as part of our Our business outlook remains favorable, Strength in Agricultural Products, Chemicals, Total Service Integration – Carload Initiative with over 90 percent of the markets stable Minerals, Metals, and Paper and Forest (“TSI – Carload”). or improving for the foreseeable future. Products drove these results, with all of Crude oil, frac sand, LPG, metals, and these business units delivering greater than As we close 2014, we need our short line domestic coal should all continue to grow. four percent interline growth with our short partners to stay focused on interchange With ongoing commercial and operating line partners. Domestic utility coal has also service efficiency, and continue to focus from our short line partners, the end experienced a huge turnaround since earlier focus on turning equipment as quickly of 2014 and beginning of 2015 look very this year, and has helped produce an almost as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • UTU News. June2008
    Volume 4 0 June 2008 N u m b e r 6 www.utuia.org www.utu.org The Official Publication of the United Transportation Union News and Notes U.S. rail members ratify Accidents take members Three UTU members – Eli A. Locklear, James Wilson, and David C. Goolsby – have U T U national agre e m e n t been killed in separate incidents. By overwhelming margins within each craft, “ A d d i t i o n a l l y,” said Futhey, “the UTU was L o c k l e a r, 46, a CSX conductor and member of Local 1011 at Hamlet, N.C., was killed May members of the United Transportation Union the only union to gain continuation of a COLA, 26 when he was crushed by tons of coal while have ratified a new national rail agreement beginning in 2010, while a new agreement is unloading a train. He was part of a two-person covering wages, rules and being negotiated. The COLA put crew that was unloading a 97-car train at working conditions. some $7 more per day in members’ Progress Energ y ’s Weatherspoon Plant when he The ratified agreement is pockets while we were at the nego- either fell or was pulled down into the coal. retroactive to Jan. 1, 2005, tiating table this round. Wilson, 35, a UP conductor and member and remains in force through “ We also retained, undis- of Local 923 in Dalhart, Texas, was riding on Dec. 31, 2009. turbed, our locally negotiat- top of a train car that was being pushed in an Amarillo, Texas, yard when he fell and was “In the face of recurring ed crew-consist agreements, hit by the train.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report
    Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report Genesee & Wyoming Inc.*owns or leases 122 freight railroads worldwide that are organized into 10 operating regions with approximately 7,300 employees and 3,000 customers. * The terms “Genesee & Wyoming,” “G&W,” “the company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer collectively to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies. Financial Highlights Years Ended December 31 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Statement of Operations Data Operating revenues $874,916 $1,568,643 $1,639,012 $2,000,401 $2,001,527 Operating income 190,322 380,188 421,571 384,261 289,612 Net income 52,433 271,296 261,006 225,037 141,096 Net income attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 48,058 269,157 260,755 225,037 141,137 Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. common stockholders: Diluted earnings per common share (EPS) $1.02 $4.79 $4.58 $3.89 $2.42 Weighted average shares - Diluted 51,316 56,679 56,972 57,848 58,256 Balance Sheet Data as of Period End Total assets $5,226,115 $5,319,821 $5,595,753 $6,703,082 $7,634,958 Total debt 1,858,135 1,624,712 1,615,449 2,281,751 2,359,453 Total equity 1,500,462 2,149,070 2,357,980 2,519,461 3,187,121 Operating Revenues Operating Income Net Income Diluted Earnings ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) 421.61,2 Per Common Share 2 2,001.5 401.6 1 $2,000 2,000.4 $400 394.12 $275 271.3 $5.00 1 2 4.79 1 374.3 1 380.21 384.3 261.0 4.581 1,800 250 4.50 350 1,639.0 225.01 225 2 1 1,600 233.5 4.00 2 3.89 1,568.6 4.10 2 300 2 200 213.9 213.3 2 3.78 2 1,400 1 3.50 3.69 289.6 183.32 3.142 250 175 1,200 3.00 211.
    [Show full text]
  • CS/HB 489 Railroad Police Officers SPONSOR(S): Criminal Justice Subcommittee; Stone and Others TIED BILLS: IDEN./SIM
    HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS BILL #: CS/HB 489 Railroad Police Officers SPONSOR(S): Criminal Justice Subcommittee; Stone and others TIED BILLS: IDEN./SIM. BILLS: REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF 1) Criminal Justice Subcommittee 11 Y, 0 N, As Cunningham Cunningham CS 2) Justice Appropriations Subcommittee 13 Y, 0 N McAuliffe Jones Darity 3) Judiciary Committee SUMMARY ANALYSIS The Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission (CJSTC) establishes uniform minimum standards for the employment and training of law enforcement officers (LEOs). Currently, CJSTC certifies a person for employment as an LEO if: The person complies with s. 943.13(1)-(10), F.S.; and The employing agency complies with s. 943.133(2) and (3), F.S. Section 943.10, F.S., defines the term “law enforcement officer” to include only those elected, appointed, or employed full time by any municipality, the state, or any political subdivision of the state. Similarly, the definition of the term “employing agency” only includes agencies or units of government, municipalities, the state, or any political subdivision of the state that has the authority to employ officers. Section 354.01, F.S., authorizes the Governor to appoint “special officers,” which are persons employed by railroads for the protection of the railroad’s employees, passengers, freight, equipment, and properties. Special officers are required to meet the law enforcement qualifications and training requirements of s. 943.13(1)-(10), F.S., but they are not certified law enforcement officers because they do not work for an “employing agency.” Railroads and common carriers that employ special officers are not considered employing agencies because they are not governmental entities.
    [Show full text]
  • The FLORIDA HISTORICAL QUARTERLY
    Volume XXXII October, 1953 Number 2 The FLORIDA HISTORICAL QUARTERLY CONTENTS The Florida, Atlantic and Gulf Central Railroad Paul E. Fenlon The Election of 1876 in Florida Gov. Marcellus L. Stearns (ed. by) Edward C. Williamson Spanish Interest in British Florida Mark F. Boyd & Jose N. Latorre Book Reviews: Pettingill, “Story of the Florida Railroads” Dorothy Dodd Graff, “Mandarin on the St. Johns” Dena Snodgrass Sitterson, “Sugar Country” J. E. Dovell Wilgus (ed.) “The Caribbean” Ione S. Wright Aguilera (ed.) “Handbook of Latin American Studies” Marshall K. Powers Newman, “Indian River History” Southern Historical Association in Jacksonville Historical Association of Southern Florida The Florida Historical Society New members SUBSCRIPTION FOUR DOLLARS SINGLE COPIES ONE DOLLAR (Copyright, 1953, by the Florida Historical Society. Reentered as second class matter November 21, 1947, at the post office at Tallahassee, Florida, under the Act of August 24, 1912.) Office of publication, Tallahassee, Florida Published quarterly by THE FLORIDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Gainesville, Florida THE FLORIDA, ATLANTIC AND GULF CENTRAL R. R. THE FIRST RAILROAD IN JACKSONVILLE by PAUL E. FENLON Though the factors responsible for the failure of Florida to ex- perience the rapid economic development which took place in the vast western areas of the United States during the latter half of the nineteenth century are numerous and diverse, lack of ade- quate railroad transportation, certainly until the 1880’s, stands out as one of the most important. Midway in the nineteenth century there was not in operation a single mile of railroad in the entire State of Florida. 1 Further- more, the development of railroad transportation facilities that did take place during most of the remainder of the century was spo- radic and relatively unplanned.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Freight Rail Component of the Florida Rail Plan
    final report 2004 Freight Rail Component of the Florida Rail Plan prepared for Florida Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 4445 Willard Avenue, Suite 300 Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815 with Charles River Associates June 2005 final report 2004 Freight Rail Component of the Florida Rail Plan prepared for Florida Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 4445 Willard Avenue, Suite 300 Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815 with Charles River Associates Inc. June 2005 2004 Freight Rail Component of the Florida Rail Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 Purpose........................................................................................................................... ES-1 Florida’s Rail System.................................................................................................... ES-2 Freight Rail and the Florida Economy ....................................................................... ES-7 Trends and Issues.......................................................................................................... ES-15 Future Rail Investment Needs .................................................................................... ES-17 Strategies and Funding Opportunities ...................................................................... ES-19 Recommendations........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Index to Volume 77
    INDEX TO VOLUME 77 Reproduction of any part of this volume for commercial pur poses is not allowed without the specific permission of the publishers. All contents © 2016 and 2017 by Kalmbach Publishing Co., Wau kesha, Wis. JANUARY 2017 THROUGH DECEMBER 2017 – 910 PAGES HOW TO USE THIS INDEX: Feature material has been indexed three or more times—once by the title under which it was published, again under the author’s last name, and finally under one or more of the subject categories or railroads. Photographs standing alone are indexed (usually by railroad), but photo graphs within a feature article are not separately indexed. Brief news items are indexed under the appropriate railroad and/or category; news stories are indexed under the appro- priate railroad and/or category and under the author’s last name. Most references to people are indexed under the company with which they are easily identified; if there is no easy identification, they may be indexed under the person’s last name (for deaths, see “Obi t uaries”). Maps, museums, radio frequencies, railroad historical societies, rosters of locomotives and equipment, product reviews, and stations are indexed under these categories. Items from countries other than the U.S. and Canada are indexed under the appropriate country. A Amtrak Capitol Limited at Point of Rocks, Md., Gallery, 10 minutes at Fassifern, In My Own Words, Jan 56-57 Mar 69 Aberdeen & Asheboro: Amtrak consists, Ask TRAINS, Nov 65 Sleepy short line to busy unit train host, Jun 24-31 (correc) Amtrak diners enter service,
    [Show full text]
  • Pullman Company Archives
    PULLMAN COMPANY ARCHIVES THE NEWBERRY LIBRARY Guide to the Pullman Company Archives by Martha T. Briggs and Cynthia H. Peters Funded in Part by a Grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities Chicago The Newberry Library 1995 ISBN 0-911028-55-2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................. v - xii ... Access Statement ............................................ xiii Record Group Structure ..................................... xiv-xx Record Group No . 01 President .............................................. 1 - 42 Subgroup No . 01 Office of the President ...................... 2 - 34 Subgroup No . 02 Office of the Vice President .................. 35 - 39 Subgroup No . 03 Personal Papers ......................... 40 - 42 Record Group No . 02 Secretary and Treasurer ........................................ 43 - 153 Subgroup No . 01 Office of the Secretary and Treasurer ............ 44 - 151 Subgroup No . 02 Personal Papers ........................... 152 - 153 Record Group No . 03 Office of Finance and Accounts .................................. 155 - 197 Subgroup No . 01 Vice President and Comptroller . 156 - 158 Subgroup No. 02 General Auditor ............................ 159 - 191 Subgroup No . 03 Auditor of Disbursements ........................ 192 Subgroup No . 04 Auditor of Receipts ......................... 193 - 197 Record Group No . 04 Law Department ........................................ 199 - 237 Subgroup No . 01 General Counsel .......................... 200 - 225 Subgroup No . 02
    [Show full text]
  • Mr. Keith T. Borman Vice President and General Counsel American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association 50 F Street NW, Suite 7020 Washington, DC 20001
    U.S. Department 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE of Transportation Washington, DC 20590 Federal Railroad Administration AUG 2 9 2018 Mr. Keith T. Borman Vice President and General Counsel American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association 50 F Street NW, Suite 7020 Washington, DC 20001 Re: Docket Number FRA-2009-0078 Dear Mr. Borman: This letter is in response to the American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association's (ASLRRA) August 7. 2018, petition to the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). ASLRRA requested that FRA expand the regulatory relief granted in Docket Number FRA-2009-0078 to include two additional ASLRRA member railroads as parties to the waiver. The ASLRRA member railroads that seek to become parties to the subject waiver are the Regional Rail — Tyburn Railroad L.L.C. and the South Plains Lamesa Railroad, Ltd. The existing waiver provides ASLRRA member railroads relief from the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 21103(a)(4), which, in part, requires a train employee to receive 48 hours off-duty after initiating an on-duty period, each day, for 6 consecutive days. The existing waiver allows employees, working for railroads that are subject to the waiver, to receive 24 hours off-duty after initiating an on-duty period, each day, for 6 consecutive days. FRA notes that ASLRRA expressed in its request that the two above-referenced railroads sought employee input concerning the waiver request, and that the affected employees at each railroad support the waiver. ASLRRA also expressed that employee input concerning the waiver had been documented and will be made available to FRA upon request.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2012 Annual Report
    Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2012 Annual Report Genesee & Wyoming Inc. (G&W) owns and operates short line and regional freight railroads in the United States, Australia, Canada, the Netherlands and Belgium. In addition, G&W operates the 1,400-mile Tarcoola to Darwin rail line, which links the Port of Darwin with the Australian interstate rail network in South Australia. Operations currently include 111 railroads organized in 11 regions, with nearly 15,000 miles of owned and leased track, 4,600 employees and over 2,000 customers. We provide rail service at 35 ports in North America, Australia and Europe and perform contract coal loading and railcar switching for industrial customers. Australia Region North Sea NETHERLANDS Rotterdam Maas River Betuweroute to Germany Kijfhoek Rail Yard Rail Feeding Headquarters Europe Rotterdam Rail Feeding, B.V. Region Belgium Rail Feeding BVBA BELGIUM Antwerp Port Operations On the Cover: A newly re-branded New England Central “mother-slug” locomotive set Shunting Contracts transports wood chips to fuel a power plant in Burlington, Vermont. Genesee & Wyoming Inc. Pacific Region Mountain West Region Central Region Rail Link Region North American Operations Canada Region Northeast Region Midwest Region Ohio Valley Region Rail Link Region G&W Railroads Port Operations Industrial Switching Southern Contract Coal Loading Region Dashed line indicates Trackage Rights; gray line indicates Out of Service. www.gwrr.com Financial Highlights (In thousands, except per share amounts) Years Ended December 31 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 Income Statement Data Operating revenues $874,916 $829,096 $630,195 $544,866 $601,984 Income from operations 190,322 191,779 130,410 99,322 115,931 Income from continuing operations, net of tax 52,551 119,493 78,669 60,075 72,975 Net income available to common stockholders 48,058 119,484 81,260 61,327 72,231 Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 172/Wednesday, September 5
    Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 5, 2012 / Notices 54655 identified and considered early in the determination, and its finding may be FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Section 106 review process. rebutted by filings and evidence Jonathon Binet, (202) 245–0368. submitted into the record for this [Assistance for the hearing impaired is VII. Definitions proceeding. The Board will give careful available through the Federal If not specifically addressed below, consideration to any claims that the Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1– terms used within this Program Transaction would have anticompetitive 800–877–8339.] Comment shall be defined consistent effects that are not apparent from the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: GWI is a application itself. with the definitions provided in 36 CFR publicly traded, noncarrier holding part 800. DATES: The effective date of this company. RailAmerica is a publicly Common Bridge is, for purposes of decision is September 5, 2012. Any traded, noncarrier holding company. this Program Comment, a common post- person who wishes to participate in this See Appendix B for a complete list of 1945 bridge or culvert of a type proceeding as a party of record (POR) each company’s relevant holdings. identified in Section V. must file, no later than September 19, Program Comment is an alternative to 2012, a notice of intent to participate. Applicants state that, pursuant to an Section 106 review that allows a Federal All comments, protests, requests for agreement and plan of merger agency to request the ACHP to comment conditions, and any other evidence and (Agreement), Jaguar Acquisition Sub, on a category of undertakings in lieu of argument in opposition to the primary Inc., a newly formed, wholly owned conducting individual reviews under application and related filings, noncarrier subsidiary of GWI, would Sections 800.4 through 800.6 of the including filings by the U.S.
    [Show full text]